YORK COLLEGE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM SCWK 470/SOC 321: SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODS II Semester: Day and Time: Office Hours and Room: Instructor: Phone: Email: Bulletin description: Prereq: SCWK 350. Prereq or Coreq: SCWK 400, SCWK 410. Application of the scientific method, the logic of experimentation, and rules of evidence to social data, with particular attention to experimental and quasi-experimental research designs, including single-case designs; measurement problems; and sampling designs and the use of inferential statistics. Course Overview: The Research Sequence This is the second course in a two-course sequence in social research. The purpose of the research sequence is to contribute to the preparation of generalist social workers who: 1) appreciate a scientific, analytic approach to knowledge building; 2) understand the concepts and procedures that are employed in the formal development of social work’s knowledge base; 3) are able to use findings of social research to guide the development of evidence-based principles of professional practice so as to be able to provide high-quality services, initiate change, and improve practice, policy, and social service delivery; 4) are able to communicate about empirically based knowledge, including evidence-based interventions; and 5) are able to participate meaningfully in the research process to expand the professional knowledge base, including evaluation of their own practice. In light of the missions of the Social Work Program and York College, special attention is given to concepts and procedures that are commonly used in describing, analyzing and understanding oppressed groups, diverse cultures, urban settings and global perspectives. Examples of social work research are drawn largely from these domains; as well as from York Social Work faculty and student publications. In considering empirical research as a means of developing the knowledge base of professional social work, the courses stress issues related to the conduct of research in a practice profession, the relationship between research and practice, the application of principles of critical thinking to both research and practice, and the ethical considerations crucial in research. The two courses in research form an integrated and articulated sequence within the concept of a spiral curriculum. That is, some of the material is presented at least twice – once in SW 350 and 1 again, in SW 470 – the second time at a higher level of conceptualization, specificity, and with a greater level of understanding. The first course is a foundation course taken in the junior year. The second course is taken in the senior year, either subsequent to, or concomitant with, field placement. The second course builds upon the content of the first course, and demonstration of mastery of the content of the foundation course is a prerequisite for registering for the second course. SOCIAL WORK 470 completes the presentation, begun in SCWK 350, of the basic content related to the research enterprise, in general, and evidence based practice, in particular: propositions and variables in social work; conceptual and operational definitions of variables; causal inference in social work research; univariate and bivariate frequency distributions; central tendency, dispersion and shape as descriptors of a univariate frequency distribution; and ethical issues in the research enterprise. Social Work 470 also presents content related to: validity, reliability and error in measurement; sampling; external validity and internal validity of research design; experiments and quasi-experiments in social work research; and sampling distributions and probability. Finally, the course focuses on the application of these concepts to the reading of research reports that inform evidence based practice. Course Objectives Upon completion of the course, the student should be able to demonstrate: 1. understanding of measurement in social work, both qualitative and quantitative 2. understanding of research designs especially adapted to conducting evidence based research on social work practice 3. understanding of the conditions that are required for the valid interpretation of social work research findings - especially regarding findings for evidence based practice 4. ability to read and comprehend inferential statistical data in professional journals; particular attention will be paid to data relevant to oppressed groups, diverse cultures, urban settings and global perspectives 5. understanding of the integration of measurement, research design and data analysis in the research enterprise 6. ability to apply measurement concepts in the evaluation of assessment procedures in evidence based practice 7. ability to apply research procedures in the evaluation of programs in the delivery of professional services 8. ability to apply the basic concepts of research in the reading of research reports – especially reports of evidence based practice 9. ability to apply the basic concepts of research in the analysis and evaluation of research reports – especially reports of evidence based practice 10. ability to use research findings in professional practice, i.e., to use research findings as a basis for evidence based practice (including micro and macro practice, the initiation of change, and the improvement of practice, policy, and social service delivery) 11. proficiency in the use of the scientific method in situations outside research activities, per se, e.g., case assessments 12. intermediate understanding of the ethical issues in the research enterprise 2 13. beginning ability to design (and possibly implement) an ethically sound research project; this project may be single subject design; and it may be an evaluation of the student’s own practice 14. intermediate ability to search the literature for evidence based knowledge 15. intermediate ability to use the technology of electronic databases, including Psychological Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts, Medline, CINAHL, and UNESCO Bibliography of the Social Sciences. Evaluation of Student Performance 1. Quizzes (6-8) 2. Research project 3. Midterm examination 4. Final examination (this is a departmental exam that is given in class during Finals Week; it is an objective-type exam and is cumulative) 5. Submission of all assignments on time; knowledgeable class participation; punctuality and attendance 15% 25% 25% 25% 10% Instructional Methods 1. Presentation by instructor 2. Class exercises, e.g., small group work on reading research reports – especially evidencebased reports; presentation by small groups to whole class; interactive mock research conferences 3. Class discussions 4. Reading assignments 5. Writing assignments with instructor feedback 6. Examinations 7. Design of an evidence based research project 8. Reading of research reports 9. Searching databases for evidence based knowledge 10. Computer exercises 11. Opportunity to attend (and possibly present at) a professional research conference Policy on Attendance and Participation Students are expected to attend all classes and to be on time. Absence and lateness for class will be incorporated into the final grade. Participation includes preparing for class by completing assigned readings, participating in class discussions in an informed manner, moving the class forward by asking questions or making comments, and actively completing in-class exercises. Policy on Assignments Written and oral assignments must be submitted on the due date. Final assignment and designated preliminary assignments must be submitted on time. The penalty for lateness in submission of preliminary assignments may be refusal of instructor to 3 provide feedback; the penalty for lateness in submission of final assignment will be the reduction of grade by 3 points for each day late. Policy on Academic Integrity Academic honesty means that other’s work is given attribution. References used to prepare student papers or presentations must be appropriately cited. Any collaborative efforts among students must be cleared with the instructor. Students must assume responsibility for maintaining honesty in all work submitted for credit. Violations to academic integrity include cheating, plagiarism, fabrication, purchasing other’s work and submitting it as one’s own, allowing one’s work to be used by others, multiple submission of work, and misuse of computers. Violations of academic integrity will be addressed in accordance with The City University of New York policy on academic integrity, as described in the York College Bulletin. To avoid plagiarism, give credit whenever you use: another person’s idea, opinion, or theory; any facts, statistics, graphs, drawings that are not common knowledge; quotations of another person’s actual spoken or written words; a paraphrase of another person’s spoken or written words. 4 Primary Learning Sources General Sources: *American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. *Ginsberg, L. (1995). Social work almanac (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers. *Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research methods for social work (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. *Weinbach, R. W., & Grinnell, R. M. (2004). Statistics for social workers (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. *Wilson, W. C. (n.d.). The psychological impact of the experience of unemployment. Unpublished manuscript. (Handout) York College Student Sources: *Baboolal, T. (2003, May). World Trade Center Attack and dysphoria: Comparison of two matched groups (exposed and not exposed). Paper presented at Hunter College Psychology Convention, New York. *Brown, D., Nish, L., Park, M., & Evola, M., (2003, May). Emotional attachment to the World Trade Center and stress. Paper presented at Hunter College Psychology Convention, New York . York College Faculty Sources: *Acker, G. M. (2003). Role conflict and ambiguity: Do they predict burnout among mental health service providers? Social Work in Mental Health, 1, 63-80. *Ashton, V. (2001). The relationship between attitudes toward corporal punishment and the perception and reporting of child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 389-399. *Rosenthal, B. S. (1986). Predictors of American social workers’ interest in working in the Developing World. (Doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1882A. (On reserve in library) *Required reading 5 COURSE OUTLINE 1.0 Introduction (1 hour) 1.1 Administrative matters 1.2 Overview of course 1.2.1. The importance of social research for social workers: evidence based practice 1.2.2 Foundations of evidence based practice: the distinction between values and knowledge 1.2.3. Structure of the research enterprise (and the course): research problem (problem formulation, justification, conceptual analysis), measurement, research design, statistics, data analysis 1.2.4 Similarities between research and practice 1.2.5 Nature of the course focuses on concepts and logical thinking, not mathematics statistics are a tool of research 1.3 The nature and purpose of social research: the basis for evidence-based practice 1.3.1 Errors in human inquiry 1.3.2 The basis of social science 1.3.3 The creation of social science knowledge and of evidence based practice knowledge 1.3.4 Empirically substantiated social science theory Readings** *Rubin & Babbie, Chapters 1, 2, 3 2.0 Using the Library and APA bibliographic style: Intermediate Level (2 hours) 2.1 Databases 2.1.1 York, CUNY holdings; Inter Library Loan system 2.1.2 Useful databases for social workers: Psychological Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts, ERIC, Medline, CINAHL, UNESCO Bibliography of the Social Sciences 2.1.3 Searching databases, using technology and key words, for evidence based practice 2.2 APA Style 2.2.1 In the text and in references 2.2.2 Differences in style for print (book, journal, newspaper), non-print, and electronic sources 2.3 Reading research reports: APA style *Rubin & Babbie, Appendix A *APA Manual, Skim entire book *Handouts: Clarifying Grade Expectations What Is a Professional Journal? Social Work Journals Inter-Library Loan Requests CUNY libraries *Required reading **Note: Readings due on first date of topic, unless otherwise specified. 6 3.0 Ethical Issues in research: Intermediate Level (2 hours) 3.1 Similarities between ethical issues in research and in practice 3.2 NASW Code of Ethics as applied to practice and to research 3.3 Ethical requirement to use evidence based practice; and unethical nature of using interventions that are not evidence based 3.4 Anonymity and confidentiality 3.5 Informed consent 3.6 Voluntary participation 3.7 Institutional Review Board 3.8 Bias and insensitivity 3.9 Reading research reports: ethical issues Readings** *Rubin & Babbie, Chapter 4 *NASW Code of Ethics: http://www.naswdc.org/code.htm *APA Manual, “Guidelines to reduce bias in language,” pp. 46-60 *Application to Institutional Review Board for approval of a research project 4.0 Descriptive Statistics - Intermediate Level: Organizing the evidence as a basis for evidence based practice; reading reports of descriptive statistics (3 hours) 4.1 Statistics: Overview 4.2 Characteristics of Arabic numbering system 4.3 Application of characteristics of Arabic numbering system to levels of measurement 4.4 Application of levels of measurement to social work research 4.5 Organizing data: frequency distribution 4.6 Application to social work research 4.7 Reducing data: measures of central tendency measures of dispersion shape 4.8 Reading research reports: descriptive statistics a. Reading reports of evidence based research in the lay press b. Reading tables/figures/charts/graphs c. Reading evidence based reports in journal articles and books Readings** *Weinbach and Grinnell, Chapters 1-3 *Ashton, 1999, p. 544 *Beckerman, Letteney, & Lorber, 2000, Figures 1-6 *New York Times, Ginsberg Selected readings Greenstein, 2001, Chapter 5 *Required reading **Note: Readings due on first date of topic, unless otherwise specified. 7 5.0 The Research Report (2 hours) 5.1 How the research report reflects the research enterprise: [research problem (problem formulation, justification, conceptual analysis), measurement, research design, statistics, data analysis] 5.2 Reading research reports: identifying components Readings** *Idealized model outline of a research report (handout) *Rubin & Babbie, Appendix C *Rosenthal (1986), skim entire book *Rosenthal & Schreiner, 2000 *Baboolal, 2003 6.0 Problem Formulation: An essential component of evidence-based practice (3 hours) 6.1 Stages in problem formulation 6.1.1 Knowledge propositions 6.1.2 Social work knowledge propositions 6.2 Literature review: searching the literature for evidence-based knowledge 6.3 Feasibility 6.4 Units of analysis 6.5 Reading research reports: problem formulation Readings** *Rubin & Babbie, Chapter 5 *Rosenthal (1986), Chapters 1, 2 *Wilson, n.d., pp. 1-2, up to “Method” *Baboolal, 2003, Introduction *Brown, Nish, Park, & Evola, 2003, Introduction *Wilson and Rosenthal, 2003, Introduction *Required reading **Note: Readings due on first date of topic, unless otherwise specified. 8 7.0 Measurement - Intermediate Level: Key Ingredients in Evidence Based Practice: (3 hours) 7.1 Variables 7.2 Hypotheses 7.3 Conceptualization of variables 7.3.1 Understanding the concept 7.3.2 Application of the concept to social work variables 7.3.3 Identification of conceptual definitions of variables in research reports 7.4 Identification of hypotheses in research reports 7.5 Student development of hypotheses 7.6 Operationalization of variables 7.6.1 Difference between qualitative and quantitative research 7.6.2 Understanding the concept 7.6.3 Application of the concept to social work variables 7.6.4 Identification of operational definitions of variables in research reports 7.7 Reading research reports: identifying variables, conceptual definitions, operational definitions, hypotheses Readings** *Rubin and Babbie, Chapters 6, 7, 13 *Wilson, n.d., “Method” *Baboolal, 2003 “Method” *Barnes, 1999, “Method” 8.0 Empirical Status of A Knowledge Proposition: The Degree to which a Knowledge Proposition is Evidence Based (4 hours) 8.1 Explanation of the concept 8.2 Importance to social work practitioners 8.3 Determining the empirical status of a knowledge proposition 8.4 Application of the concept to actual studies 8.5 Student development of a knowledge proposition 8.6 Application of the concept to student’s knowledge proposition 8.7 Use of computerized databases to determine the empirical status of a knowledge proposition Determining “key words” Using the thesaurus 8.8 Application of the use of computerized databases to student’s knowledge proposition 8.9 Reading research reports: Empirical Status of a knowledge proposition Readings** *Rosenthal (1986), Chapter 3 *McCullough, 1999 *Wilson and Rosenthal, 2003 *Required reading **Note: Readings due on first date of topic, unless otherwise specified. 9 9.0 Measurement - Technical Adequacy of Operational Definitions of Variables: (5 hours) 9.1 Reliability 9.1.1 Understanding the concept 9.1.2 Application of the concept to social work variables Identification of reliability of operational definitions of variables in research reports 9.2 Validity 9.2.1 Understanding the concept 9.2.2 Application of the concept to social work variables 9.2.3 Identification of validity of operational definitions of variables in research reports 9.3 Feasibility 9.3.1 Understanding the concept 9.3.2 Application of the concept to social work variables 9.3.3 Recognition of feasibility as an issue for the researcher (not the consumer) 9.4 Reading research reports: Technical adequacy of operational definitions Readings** *Rubin & Babbie, Chapters 7-8, Appendix D *Rosenthal (1986), pp. 84-100 *Ashton, 1999, “Method” *Wilson, n.d., pp. 2-3, “Method” *Baboolal, 2003, “Method” *Brown, Nish, Park, & Evola, 2003, “Method” *Required reading **Note: Readings due on first date of topic, unless otherwise stated. 10 10.0 Research Design: Another Key Ingredient in Evidence Based Practice (9 hours) 10.1 External Validity 10.1.1 Representative Sampling Random Simple random sampling Stratified random sampling Matching 10.1.2 Non-representative sampling Convenience Single Subject 10.1.3. Determining the type of sampling used in a social work study 10.1.4. Determining the type of sampling used in studies of the student’s knowledge proposition 10.1.5. Reading research reports: External validity Readings** *Rubin & Babbie, Chapter 9 *Rosenthal (1986), pp. 101-110 *Acker, 2003, “Methods: Respondents” *Rosenthal & Hutton, 2001, pp. 368-373 *Required reading **Note: Readings due on first date of topic, unless otherwise stated. 11 10.0 Research Design (continued) 10.2 Internal Validity 10.2.1 Covariation Understanding the concept Application of the concept to social work hypotheses Identification of covariation in research reports Identification of covariation in research reports on student’s knowledge proposition 10.2.2 Control of potentially contaminating variables Understanding the concept Application of the concept to social work hypotheses Identification of potentially contaminating variables in research reports Identification of potentially contaminating variables in research reports on student’s knowledge proposition 10.2.3 Temporal priority Understanding the concept Application of the concept to social work hypotheses Identification of temporal priority in research reports Identification of temporal priority in research reports on student’s knowledge proposition 10.2.4 Reading research reports: Internal validity Readings** *Rubin & Babbie, Chapters 10, 11 *Rosenthal (1986), pp. 101-110 *Ashton, 2001, pp. 394-395 *Wilson, n.d., pp. 1-3, “Method” *Baboolal, 2003, “Method” * Brown, Nish, Park, & Evola, 2003, “Method” 10.3 Paradigms of Research Design 10.3.1 Experimental Design 10.3.2 Quasi-Experimental Design 10.2.3 Single Subject Design *Rubin & Babbie, Chapters 12-14 *Required reading **Note: Readings due on first date of topic, unless otherwise specified. 12 11.0 Inferential Statistics: Essential to Understanding Evidence Based Knowledge (6 hours) 11.1 Sampling Distributions 11.1.1 Understanding the concept 11.1.2 Application of the concept to social work research 11.2 Probability 11.2.1 Understanding the concept 11.2.2 Application of the concept to social work research 11.2.3 Identification of probability in the text of research reports 11.2.4 Identification of probability in tables of research reports 11.2.5 Identification of probability in research reports on student’s knowledge proposition 11.3 Statistical Decision Making Process 11.3.1 Understanding the concept 11.3.2 Application of the concept to social work research 11.3.3 Identification of the process in the text of research reports 11.3.4 Identification of the process in tables of research reports 11.3.5 Identification of the statistical decision making process in research reports on student’s knowledge proposition 11.3.6 Reading research reports: inferential statistics Readings** *Weinbach and Grinnell, Chapters 5, 6, 10, 11 *Rubin & Babbie, Chapter 17 *Research articles (to be chosen from among those in Bibliography, pp. 14-15) *Wilson, n.d. pp. 3-5, “Findings” *McCullough, 1999 *Baboolal, 2003, “Findings” *Barnes, 1999, “Findings” *Brooks, Nackerud, & Risler, 2001, “Results” *Required reading **Note: Readings due on first date of topic, unless otherwise specified. 13 12.0 Data Analysis and Interpretation (3 hours) 12.1 Processing Data 12.1.1 Coding (using a codebook) 12.1.2 Data cleaning 12.2 Interpreting Data 12.2.1 Differentiating between interpretation and findings 12.2.2 Interpreting research reports 12.2.3 Interpreting research reports on student’s knowledge proposition Readings** *Rubin & Babbie, Chapters 15-16 *Rosenthal, 1986, Chapters 5-6 *Wilson & Rosenthal, 2003, pp. 337-352 *Wilson n.d., pp. 3-6 *Baboolal, 2003, “Implications” * Brown, Nish, Park, & Evola, 2003, Implications” *Research articles (to be chosen from among those in Bibliography, pp. 14-15) 13.0 Final Exam (2 hours) 14 Bibliography: Learning to Read Research Focusing on: oppressed groups, diverse cultures, urban settings and global perspectives and including York Social Work faculty and student research *Acker, G. M. (2003). Role conflict and ambiguity: Do they predict burnout among mental health service providers? Social Work in Mental Health, 1, 63-80. Albert, V., & Catlin, S. N. (2002). Strategic interaction among the states: An in-depth look at the welfare “race to the bottom.” Social Work Research, 26, 199-216. *Ashton, V. (1999). Worker judgements of seriousness about and reporting of suspected child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 539-548. *Ashton, V. (2001). The relationship between attitudes toward corporal punishment and the perception and reporting of child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 389-399. *Baboolal, T. (2003, May). World Trade Center Attack and dysphoria: Comparison of two matched groups (exposed and not exposed). Paper presented at Hunter College Psychology Convention, New York. *Barnes, F. (1999, April). Income and social support among adolescents. Paper presented at Hunter College Psychology Convention, New York. *Beckerman, N. L., Letteney, S., & Lorber, K. (2000). Key emotional issues for couples of mixed HIV status. Social Work in Health Care, 31 (4), 25-41. *Brooks, F., Nackerud, L., & Risler, E. (2001). Evaluation of a job-finding club for TANF recipients: Psychosocial impacts. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 79-92. *Brown, D., Nish, L., Park, M., & Evola, M. (2003, May). Emotional attachment to the World Trade Center and stress. Paper presented at Hunter College Psychology Convention, New York. Cheng, T. (2002). Welfare recipients: How do they become independent? Social Work Research, 26, 159-170. Elze, D. E. (2002). Risk factors for internalizing and externalizing problems among gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents. Social Work Research, 26, 89-9100. Kaplan, B. (2003). “I want to read stuff on boys”: White, Latina, and Black girls reading seventeen magazine and encountering adolescence. Adolescence, 38, 141-159. Kosberg, J. I., Lowenstein, a., Garcia, J. L., & Biggs, S. (2002). Challenges to the cross-cultural and cross-national study of elder abuse. Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation, 3, 19-31. *McCullough, M. E. (1999). Research on religion-accommodative counseling: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 92-98. *National Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of Ethics. Retrieved October 17, 2003, from http://www.naswdc.org/code.htm *Rosenthal, B. S., & Hutton, E. M. (2001). Exposure to community violence and trauma symptoms in late adolescence: Comparison of a college sample and a noncollege community sample. Psychological Reports, 88, 367-374. *Rosenthal, B. S., & Schreiner, A. C. (2000). Prevalence of psychological symptoms among undergraduate students in an ethnically diverse urban public college. Journal of American College Health, 49, 12-18. *Rosenthal, B. S. (1986). Predictors of American social workers’ interest in working in the Developing World. (Doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1882A. (On reserve in library) 15 Schiff, M., Witte, S. S., & El-Bassel, N. (2003). Client satisfaction and perceived helping components of an HIV/AIDS preventive intervention for urban couples. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 468-492. Simoni, J. M., & Ortiz, M. Z. (2003). Mediational models of spirituality and depressive symptomatology among HIV-positive Puerto Rican women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 9, 3-15. Springer, D. W., Abell, N., & Hudson, W. W. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 1. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 408-439. Springer, D. W., Abell, N., & Nugent, W. R. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 2. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 768-795. Weisz, A. N., & Black, B. M. (2001). Evaluating a sexual assault and dating violence prevention program for urban youths. Social Work Research, 25, 89-100. Wilson, S. J., Lipsey, M. W., & Soydan, H. (2003). Are mainstream programs for juvenile delinquency less effective with minority youth than majority youth? A meta-analysis of outcomes research. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 3-26. *Wilson, W. C. (n.d.). The psychological impact of the experience of unemployment. *Wilson, W. C., & Rosenthal, B. S. (2003). The relationship between exposure to community violence and psychological distress among adolescents: A meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 18, 335-352. *Required reading Bibliography: Supplementary Textbooks Bloom, M. (1994). Single-system designs in the social services. Binghamton, NY: Haworth. Bloom, M. Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2003). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (4th ed.). Boston: Allan and Bacon/Pearson. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally. Corcoran, K., & Fischer, J. (1987). Measures for clinical practice. New York: Free Press. Corcoran, J. (2003). Clinical applications of evidence-based family interventions. New York: Oxford. Craft, J. L. (1990). Statistics and data analysis for social workers (2nd ed.). Itasca, IL: F. E. . DePoy, E., & Gilson, S. F. (2003). Evaluation practice: Thinking and action principles for social work practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson. Greenstein, T. N. (2001). Methods of family research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Grinnell, R. M. (2001). Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (6th ed.). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock. Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2004). Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice. New York: Oxford. Huck, S. W. (2004). Reading statistics and research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Levin, J., & Fox, J. A. (2004). Elementary statistics in social research: The essentials. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Marlow, C. (2001). Research methods for generalist social work 3rd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. 16 Padgett, D. K. (2004). The qualitative research experience. Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. W. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Richards, S. B., Taylor, R. L., Ramasamy, R., & Richards, R. Y. (1999). Single subject research: Applications in educational and clinical settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson. Royse, D. (2004). Research methods in social work (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. Weinbach, R. W., Grinnell, R. M., Taylor, L. M., & Unrau, Y. A. (1999). Applying research knowledge: A workbook for social work students (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Westerfelt, A., & Dietz, T. J. (2001). Planning and conducting agency-based research: A workbook for social work students in field placements. Needham Heights, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Yegidis, B. L. (2002). Research methods for social workers 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Bibliography: Relevant Journals and Websites Journals: American Journal of Orthopsychiatry Developmental Psychology Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation: An International Publication Research on Social Work Practice Social Work Social Work Abstracts Social Work Research Social Service Review Websites: American Psychological Association http://www.apa.org Centers for Disease Control and Prevention http://www.cdc.gov/scientific.htm#data Institute for the Advancement of Social Work Research http://www.iaswr.org NASW Code of Ethics http://www.naswdc.org/code.htm Society for Social Work and Research http://www.sswr.org The City University of New York Office of Library Services www.cuny.libraries.com Rosenthal 2/04 17