EUTHANASIA and PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE CASES: 1. Karen Ann Quinlan: The right to refuse treatment 2. Oregon 1994 Law (in effect 1998) - Physicians prescribe Medications in Lethal Dosage Doctors only (MD's) Protected-1998 only 15 in 29,000 deaths in Oregon 3. Federal Patient Self Determination ActRequires Notice of State Laws for refusal of treatment including Advanced Directives Obstacles Preventing the Observance of the Act and Respect for Self Determination 4. The Cruzan Case(1983): a 25 year old with PVS 1990 US Supreme Court (5-4) Decision- a LIBERTY INTEREST 5. Dr. Jack Kevorkian: Dr. DEATH! Physician Assisted Suicide Michigan Law vs Assisted Suicide; 1998 case, taped for CBS "Sixty(60) Minutes" 6. Elizabeth Bouvia(1983): Demand for Self Determination and Assistance while starving 7. A Canadian Tragedy: 12 year old girl with cerebral Palsy-carbon monoxide poisoning EUTHANASIA Meaning of the term: A good Death! An easy death? Types of Euthanasia? Active / Passive Distinction Killing vs Letting Die Voluntary vs Involuntary Self Administered - Active Self Administered - Passive Other Administered Active and Voluntary Passive and Voluntary Active and Involuntary Passive and Involuntary Active non- voluntary Passive non-voluntary DEFINING DEATH Traditional Heart Lung Criteria Whole Brain Criteria- No Consciousness, No Brain Stem Activity, IRREVERSIBLE COMA Uniform Determination of Death Act - Adopted by > 35 states not by New York Higher Brain - Coma with brain stem activity Personhood- neo cortex- loss of what is essential and characteristic Dutch Experience- 1993 Rules to allow physicians to assist or to kill people at their request 28 point check list 1990 2300 deaths that were voluntary and 400 assisted suicides 1. Patient-initiated request 2. Patient Competence 3. Informed about alternatives 4. Enduring Decision 5. Unbearable Suffering 6. Professional Consultation 7. Government Report 8. Signed and Witnessed Authorization Advanced Directives: Do Not Resuscitate Orders- DNR's Living Wills Proxy Appointments-Legal Agents The Right of Self Determination: 1. Children- guardians make decisions and may not refuse imperative (life saving) procedures 2. Adults A. Incompetent - court appointed guardian makes decisions and may not refuse imperative 9life saving) procedures B. Competent- may refuse any and all treatments: Exceptions: prisoners and those with dependents may not refuse imperative treatments C. Formerly Competent and now incapacitated OPTIONS: Doctor Decides Committee of Doctors Advanced Directives Document: Living Will Surrogate: Durable power of Attorney: PROXY Next of Kin Court ETHICAL THEORIES Natural Law: No direct termination of a life. Indirect is allowed. Pain relief even unto respiratory failure is permitted. No moral obligation to treat the hopeless cases. Allowing to die is permitted allowing nature or God's Will to take their courses. UTILITARIAN: Action or inaction that leads to death is correct when it alleviates suffering and promotes the general welfare and better feelings (utility). Kant: Rational agents have the duty to preserve their lives if possible. No deliberate suicide. When agent is no longer capable of rational thought then there is no longer a duty to preserve that life. Allowing to die is thus permitted and compatible with Kant's principle even if not required as a perfect duty. Ross: Duty to fulfill promise and a duty to act in a person's best interests. Rawls: Maximize Liberty and allow for self-determination. Minimizing the disadvantages allows for terminating treatments and hastening the death of the hopelessly ill and suffering. ARTICLES: James Rachels: Active and Passive Euthanasia No real Distinction Crucial Element is Intention Dan W. Brock: Voluntary Active Euthanasia; a Utilitarian justification J. Gay-Williams: The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia 1. it is against Nature 2. It is against Self Interest mistaken diagnosis chance of cure pessimism- self defeating 3. Practical Effects a. Dr's and RN's are committed to saving lives. They would be corrupted to think that there are occasions when the person (Patient) is better off dead. b. Slippery Slope!! from Self Administered to Other Administered from Voluntary to non-voluntary from for the benefit of the person to the benefit of others, society, humankind Daniel Callahan: When Self Determination Runs Amok US Supreme Court: Karen Quinlan Rebecca Dressen and John A. Robertson: Quality of Life and Non Treatment Decisions Bernard Gert, James L. Bernat, R. Peter Mogielnicki: Distinguishing Between Patients' Refusalas and Requests Sandol Stoddard: Terminal But Not Hopeless DECISION SCENARIOS: 1. Pneumonia and 92 year old male 2. Brain hemorrhage and 81 year old male 3.Five (5) Fatal Diseases in 70 year old male with a Living Will 4. Four deaths of elderly without higher brain functions 5. Shot dead 6.Netherlands Law 1993 7. Female 45 years old with leukemia and an overdose of prescribed medication 8. Flash Fire Victim and surrogate decision making SUICIDE What is suicide? What is required for an act of suicide? actions or omissions actions or intentions outcome or intention Attempted Suicide Committed Suicide How are these to be described? Suicide? Something else? Situations: 1 Socrates 2 Jews at Masada 3 Christians in Coliseum 4 Irish in British Prisons 5 Buddhists in Indochina 6 Woman taken by would- be rapist 7 POW's 8 Spies 9 Slaves in the hold of a slave ship 10 Persons in intractable pain 11 persons with an incurable, life threatening, debilitating 12 Persons with an emotional problem in emotional pain Would you act to prevent any of the acts above if you could? Should family members be permitted to assist in suicides? What conditions or safeguards should exist, if any? Should health care personnel be permitted to assist in suicides? Should doctors, nurses, others? What conditions or safeguards should exist, if any? disease State Intervention to Prevent Suicide State Intervention to Compel Life Saving Treatment Acts of Paternalism! Issues: Self Determination, Autonomy, Individual Liberty, Competency with Dependents and Incompetents, the guardian must decide in favor of treatment if there are such possible that will relieve , rectify or cure. Only Life Saving Medical Treatment can be imposed on another ETHICAL THEORIES: Kant- No St. Augustine- NO Hume-Yes St. Thomas Aquinas- No but maybe yes RATIONAL SUICIDE - When Death is preferable both NOW and in the FUTURE. The Role of others? A. To refrain from interference B. To Assist