ENGM 620 Fall 2010 Session Five Homework Solutions Many of these questions do not have a universal answer. Therefore, the answers are written to elicit a range of potential answers based on differing perspectives. When this is true, it is particularly important for the student to concentrate on justifying their selected perspective. Chapter Eight Discussion Questions 2. Provide an example of customer coproduction other than the example provided in the text. What are the advantages and disadvantages of customer coproduction for service providers? The text defines coproduction as a situation where the customer and the service provider work closely to produce the service. The examples used by the text are: A haircut during which the customer is observing the barber while the barber works; a hired consultant who works closely with the company’s personnel; and patrons filling their own drinks at their table. There are a myriad of other examples. The tax accountant and taxpayer going over a tax return come immediately to mind. I am sure that there are more examples than there are students in the class. In a situation like this, the closeness of the customer and provider can yield problems as well. Work habits, sanitation, different perspectives of service requirements all can interfere with providing the service. In a food oriented environment, sanitation and cleanliness become apparent. 14. How can the moment-of-truth concept be used as a training tool in a service setting? On page 247, the text identifies three basic approaches to using the “moment of truth” concept as training. Poka-yoke (or fail-safes) is designed to isolate potential areas for failure and insure that they do not happen. Three classifications are identified: warning methods, physical contact methods, and visual contact methods. Using these procedures, the process is designed not to fail. The Three T’s Identify a further definition of ways of planning not to fail. They offer a set of distinct items that can be observed and focused on. The Kroger Company case (a closer look at Quality 8-2) illustrates a situation where the “moment of truth” concept has been used successfully to improve the service that the company provides. Chapter Eight Problems 8. A state university wants to perform a gap analysis to determine what student traits corporate CEOs find most important. The exercise is to be administered to CEOs and involves two surveys – an expectations survey and a perceptions survey. All questions are answered on a 10-point scale. The attributes the CEOs are asked to rate are propensity for lifelong learning, ability to work in teams, innate ability, and cognitive ability. The results of nine surveys are synopsized in the table in the book. Perform a gap analysis by developing a two-dimensional differencing plane and evaluate the results. Based on the above two-dimensional differencing plane, more emphasis is needed in the area of lifelong learning as the expectations are high while the perceptions are low. Teamwork and innate abilities have about the right amount of emphasis (even though the perception of innate abilities is low, the expectations match). Cognitive abilities has a low expectation and a high perception, thus some of the effort currently going in to this skill may be shifted to the need are of lifelong learning. 7. (the slides said 9, but there is no nine in the book – 7 is a good question) The averages for different dimensions of service quality were computed by averaging the items pertaining to the dimension. Use the following data to determine which dimensions to emphasize. Perceptions Expectations Tangibles = 5.40 1.42 Reliability = 3.20 6.40 Responsiveness = 2.45 2.30 Assurance = 5.60 3.30 Empathy = 1.90 6.40 a. Using simple differencing, determine which dimensions should be emphasized. Simple differencing = perceptions less expectations Tangibles 5.40 – 1.42 = 3.98 Reliability 3.20 – 6.40 = -3.20 Responsiveness 2.45 – 2.30 = 0.15 Assurance 5.60 – 3.30 = 2.30 Empathy 1.90 – 6.40 = -4.50 The dimensions with the greatest negative difference should be emphasized, thus reliability and empathy. b. Use two-dimensional differencing to determine which dimensions should be emphasized. Based on the above two-dimensional differencing plane, the greatest negative mismatches are in empathy and reliability. c. Based on your findings, choose the most important dimension that needs to be improved. Both simple and two-dimensional differencing showed reliability and empathy to be the areas of greatest need. While difficult to see in the simple differencing process, the two-dimensional differencing plane makes it easy to see that while there are no dimensions in the great (i.e. high expectations and high perceptions) area, assurance and tangibles could be slightly de-emphasized in order to address the issues with empathy and reliability. Chapter Nine Discussion Questions 9. How does the contingency perspective apply to supplier partnering? Different companies in the supply chain can have different perspectives of what customers want from their suppliers. Table 9-2 presents these priorities. Assemblers, suppliers, and indirect suppliers all have a different set of importance. Knowledge of these different priorities assists in a better relationship between customers and producers. 11. Describe the concept that is referred to as supplier partnering. How does this concept differ from the traditional form of supplier–customer relationship? The theme of this material has been about improving the communications between the supplier and the customer as well as reducing the number of suppliers. This improved communication enables a better product to be delivered and, potentially, a better product for the end user. This concept is called supplier partnering. The traditional form of supplier-customer relationship has been challenging. There has been a difference in the objectives of the customer and supplier. Frequently communications have been poor, perhaps adversarial. 15. What is acceptance sampling? When is acceptance sampling needed? Acceptance sampling is a statistical procedure in which a predefined number of products are inspected for quality. This number of items can range from 100% to a small sample. There is a fair amount of controversy over this procedure. Deming stated that sampling can be most effective in a controlled number of cases as opposed to inspecting all products. On page 276, the text lists some examples of when sampling might be needed: when dealing with unproven suppliers during start-ups and when building new products when products can be damaged in shipment when dealing with extremely sensitive products that can be damaged easily when products can spoil during shipment when problems with a certain supplier have been noticed in the production processes that bring the supplier’s performance into question Chapter Nine Problems 2. Using Figure 9-5, with a sample size of n=100 and an acceptance number c=2, if a bad shipment has 40% defective, what is the probability of acceptance? What type of risk is this? The probability of acceptance is for 40% defective is practically zero. If, by chance, the book meant 4% defective, than the probability of acceptance would be about 35%. Either way, this is beta, or Consumer’s, risk. 3. Using Figure 9-5, with a sample size of n=100 and an acceptance number of c=3, if a good shipment has no more than .02 defective, what is the probability of acceptance? What type of risk is this? The probability of acceptance is about 85%. This is alpha, or Producer’s, risk. 14. Interpret the following sampling plan in plain English: n1 = 50 c1 = 2 n2 = 100 c2 = 5 r1 = 4 r2 = 6 Fifty items in the incoming lot are drawn at random. If two, one, or zero defective pieces are found, accept the lot. If four or more defective pieces are found, reject the lot. If three pieces are found defective, perform a second sample with 100 pieces. If the combined number of defective pieces in both samples is less than or equal to six, the lot can be accepted.