PHI 223
Topics In Ancient Philosophy
Stephen Makin
Autumn Semester 2010-2011
Course
Information
and
Recommended
Reading
2
Plagiarism
It is plagiarism to present the written work of an author or of another student as your
own. (You are, however, encouraged to discuss your work with others on the course.)
In any essay or exam answer submitted for assessment, all passages taken from other
people’s work, either word for word, or with small changes, must be placed within
quotation marks, with specific reference to author, title and page. There is advice on
referencing at §29 of the Information For Second-Year Students booklet. You
should have a paper copy of this Information booklet, but you can also download a
copy from
http://www.shef.ac.uk/philosophy/currentstudents/currentugs.html
No excuse can be accepted for any failure adequately to reference your sources.
Merely including the source in a bibliography will be not considered an adequate
acknowledgement. Likewise, whenever material is paraphrased, this must be
indicated by specific reference and acknowledgement. Credit should also be given for
the use of someone else’s ideas.
The minimum penalty for plagiarism is ordinarily a mark of zero for the essay.
Serious cases and repeat offences will be referred to the University Disciplinary
Committee, which has the power to expel students from the University Students in the
past have lost their degrees because of plagiarism. Any case of plagiarism will be
recorded in the student’s permanent record.
Use of handouts vs plagiarism from handouts
There has in the past been some scope for confusion on this issue, since many staff
offer the advice that ideas deriving from the lecturer do not need to be cited when
used. But the department has recently agreed that a distinction needs to be drawn
between use of ideas or arguments expounded in lectures, on the one hand (which is
legitimate without citation), and verbatim or near-verbatim reproduction of material
from lecture handouts or lecture notes/transcripts, on the other hand (which is not).
Plagiarism can easily be detected
The University subscribes to an electronic plagiarism detection service. This means
that we can send any piece of writing to a machine that checks it against a database of
millions of web pages, essays available for purchase over the internet, and essays
previously submitted by students worldwide. The machine generates a report
showing which sections of the text match something in the database, and shows
exactly where the matching items are found (e.g. it gives a web address if the text
matches something on the web). This makes it fairly easy to detect plagiarism, as
well as providing hard evidence to back up the claim that a student has cheated. It has
resulted in numerous convictions in the past. So do not be tempted!
If you are in any doubt about what counts as fair and unfair use of other people's
work, ask your tutor or lecturer for advice.
3
Timetable
There will be two lectures each week at the following times.
Tuesday
12.10-1.00
Arts Tower LT8
Wednesday 12.10-1.00
Arts Tower LT8
From week 3 onwards there will also be a weekly discussion class. There are two
alternate hours booked for discussion. Details of discussion classes, and whether there
will be one or two discussion class for this module, will be given once registration for
the module has stabilized. The two alternate discussion slots are
Wednesday 3.00-4.00
Jessop Building SR 117
Thursdays
11.00-12.00
Hicks Building LT 11
Writing week: Week 7 of the Autumn Semester (8-12 November 2010) is a writing
week. There will be no lectures or discussion seminars in the department that week.
Course Outline
Socrates has come to represent the ideal of a life devoted to philosophy. He engaged
in searching discussion with his contemporaries. He was prosecuted for impiety,
condemned to death, and accepted his sentence willingly. The main (but not the only)
source for our knowledge of Socrates is Plato. This module examines the picture of
Socrates that Plato presents in some of his early dialogues.
We start with three short non-Platonic works, intended to provide a background
against which we can view Plato’s presentation of Socrates. These works are
Gorgias
Encomium Of Helen
Gorgias
On What Is Not
Anonymous Dissoi Logoi
We will then read five early Platonic works. Three of these are dialogues representing
Socrates in philosophical discussion
Plato
Laches
Plato
Charmides
Plato
Euthyphro
The fourth is a speech, which Socrates is represented as offering at his trial
Plato
Apology
The final piece is a dialogue set shortly before Socrates’ execution, concerning his
attitude to the verdict passed on him.
Plato
Crito
Finally we look at another of Plato’s dialogues, in which he considers (among other
things) the difference between philosophy as pursued by Socrates and the activity
pursued by (such as) Gorgias (which Plato calls oratory)
Plato
Gorgias
With this dialogue we have an explicit and reflective Platonic presentation of Socratic
enquiry as philosophical. The material studied earlier in the module should help you
to think critically about this presentation.
4
Library Resources
The Library has considerable electronic resources. I intend in this module to make as
much use as possible of material which is electronically available. My reasons for
doing so are to reduce pressure on a limited number of print copies of books; to
reduce paper consumption as much as possible; and to give you valuable experience
in using and searching electronic sources.
For a general overview of the Library’s eResources see
http://www.shef.ac.uk/library/intro/
For a summary of the Philosophy resources available via the Library and online see
http://www.shef.ac.uk/library/subjects/subphil.html
You will find the following particularly useful
The PastMasters eCollection (including the Complete Works of Aristotle)
http://www.shef.ac.uk/library/cdfiles/pastmasters.html
The alphabetical list of Philosophy eBooks held by the Library
http://www.shef.ac.uk/library/ebooks/ebphil.html
The FindIt@Sheffield system which gives you access to the Library’s ejournals
http://librarylinks.shef.ac.uk:3210/sfxlcl3/az
The Philosophy Department website also has a resources page
http://www.shef.ac.uk/philosophy/resources/additional_links.html
This gives a link detailing philosophers who have posted online papers, which
includes a section on ancient philosophy
http://consc.net/people.html
Of course the Library also holds a wide range of printed material. If you are wanting
to borrow books for this module, please note that the Library runs a variable loan
status system. The loan period for a book becomes shorter whenever an item has
multiple reservations, but revert back to standard loan when the level of demand falls.
So, if there are books relevant to this module which you want to borrow from the
library, make sure to reserve them if they are on loan. The Library will continue to
provide reference only copies of key texts as appropriate
For full details of the Library’s borrowing arrangements see
http://www.shef.ac.uk/library/services/lending.html
You may find it helpful, for easy and repeated access, to collect all these links in a
bookmark folder in your web browser.
5
Reading (topic by topic)
There is an electronic version of this topic-by-topic reading list, with direct links to
electronic resources, on the Library’s myResource List for this module. Go to
http://p8080-library.shef.ac.uk.eresources.shef.ac.uk/talislist/index.jsp
Display all the Philosophy modules, and then click on PHI 223 (Topics in Ancient
Philosophy)
I have provided reading information under six headings. Different parts of the module
are best approached in different ways, and your reading strategies should probably be
different depending on which primary texts you are reading.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Primary Texts
Background Reading E-Offprints
Reading on Encomium of Helen, On What is Not and Dissoi Logoi
Socrates: Background Reading
The Early Platonic Dialogues
Plato’s Gorgias
1.
Primary Texts
The Platonic texts
You will be reading six Platonic dialogues (Laches, Euthyphro, Charmides, Apology,
Crito, Gorgias). They are contained in the set texts for the module (details below).
There are some print copies of these books in the Library. But you would be well
advised to purchase your own copies. It will not be possible to follow the module
without easy access to these texts, and the Hackett editions listed below are fairly
cheap
Plato
Plato
and others
Plato
Laches and Charmides translated Rosamond Kent Sprague (Hackett,
Indianapolis, 1992: ISBN 0-87220-134-1); current price £5.45
The Trials Of Socrates: Six Classic Texts translated C.D.C.Reeve
(Hackett, Indianapolis, 2002: ISBN 0-87220-589-4); current price
£7.95
This volume contains three works by Plato (Euthyphro, The Apology,
Crito). In addition it includes an extract from a fourth Platonic work
(Phaedo 115b-118a); a play by Aristophanes (Clouds); and a work by
Xenophon (Socrates’ Defense To The Jury).
Gorgias translated Donald J. Zeyl (Hackett, Indianapolis, 1987: ISBN
0-87220-016-7); current price £5.45
6
The non-Platonic texts
These are all accessible electronically.
Gorgias
Encomium of Helen
For the translation by George Kennedy go to
http://www.phil.vt.edu/MGifford/phil2115/Helen.htm
Gorgias
On What Is Not (On the Non-Existent)
This work has not survived in its original form. Instead we have two
ancient summaries.
One is due to Sextus Empiricus (from Adv Math 7 §§ 65-87). Go to the
Texts and Articles folder on the module MOLE site and click on
‘Gorgias: On What Is Not (Sextus)’
Another is in the pseudo-Aristotelian On Melissus, Xenophanes and
Gorgias (MXG). Go to the Library’s Past Masters eCollection (see link
above). For the MXG go to volume II of the Complete Works of
Aristotle. The material you need (on Gorgias) starts at 979a12 and
continues to the end of the treatise at 980b22
Anonymous
Dissoi Logoi
There is a translation by Rosamund Kent Sprague ‘Dissoi Logoi or
Dialexeis’ in Mind 77 (1968) pp. 155-167 [electronic access via
FindIt@Sheffield]
2.
Background Reading E-offprints
Kerferd G.B. The Sophistic Movement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1981) Chapter 5
Barnes J.
The Presocratic Philosophers (Routledge, London, 1982) pp.516-530
Wardy R.
The Birth Of Rhetoric (Routledge, London, 1996) Chapter 2
Burnyeat M. ‘Virtues In Action’ in G.Vlastos (ed) The Philosophy Of Socrates
Geach P.T.
‘Plato’s Euthyphro’ Logic Matters (Blackwell, Oxford, 1972) 31-44;
originally in Monist 50 (1966) 383-402
Burnyeat M.F. ‘The Impiety of Socrates’ in T.C.Brickhouse and N.D.Smith (eds) The
Trial and Execution of Socrates (OUP 2002) pp.133-145; originally in
Ancient Philosophy 17 (1997) 1-12
7
Santas G.X.
Socrates (Routledge And Kegan Paul, London, 1979) Chapter 2
‘Socrates and the Laws of Athens’
Mourelatos A.‘Gorgias On The Function Of Language’ Philosophical Topics 15
(1987) 135-170
3. Reading on Encomium of Helen, On What is
Not and Dissoi Logoi
These texts are less approachable than the early Platonic dialogues. It is difficult to
find helpful and accessible (ie Greekless) secondary reading.
Background
For background start with Kerferd ‘The Sophistic Movement’ chapter 5 in the
Background Reading E-offprints. Then look at the excellent overview of both the
Sophists and Socrates in
Broadie S
‘The Sophists and Socrates’ in D.Sedley (ed) Cambridge Companion
To Greek And Roman Philosophy (Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2003) pp.73-97
online via http://www.shef.ac.uk/library/cdfiles/cco.html
Encomium of Helen
See the extracts from Barnes (‘Conduct Unbecoming’) and Wardy (‘In Praise of
Fallen Women’) in the Background Reading E-offprints.
There is an article on Gorgias (by Charles Khan) in the Routledge Encyclopedia of
Philosophy: enter ‘Gorgias’ at
http://www.rep.routledge.com.eresources.shef.ac.uk/
On What Is Not
In order to appreciate this text you will need some background knowledge of
Parmenides, Zeno and Melissus. There are three convenient and reliable sources:
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://plato.stanford.edu/
Search for the articles on Parmenides (by John Palmer) and Zeno of Elea (by John
Palmer)
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://www.rep.routledge.com.eresources.shef.ac.uk/
Search for the articles on Parmenides (by David Sedley), Zeno of Elea (by Stephen
Makin) and Melissus (by David Sedley)
8
MOLE site
I have posted a pre-publication version of my ‘Parmenides, Zeno and Melissus’,
forthcoming in the Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy. See the ‘Texts and
Articles’ folder on the MOLE site.
Three items of more specialised (but difficult) reading on On What Is Not are
Caston V.
‘Gorgias On Thought And Its Objects’ in V.Caston,
D.W.Graham (eds) Presocratic Philosophy: Essays In Honour
Of Alexander Mourelatos (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2002) 205-232
Mansfeld J.
‘Historical And Philosophical Aspects Of Gorgias’ “What Is
Not”’ in J.Mansfeld Studies In The Historiography Of Greek
Philosophy (Van Gorcum, Assen, 1990) 97-125
Mourelatos A.
‘Gorgias On The Function Of Language’ Philosophical Topics
15 (1987) 135-170 [available from background reading Eoffprints]
Dissoi Logoi
There is relevant material in the extract from Barnes (‘Conduct Unbecoming’) in the
background reading E-offprints
Search in in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://www.rep.routledge.com.eresources.shef.ac.uk/
for the article on Dissoi Logoi (by Myles Burnyeat)
See also
Levi A.
‘On “Twofold Statements”’ The American Journal Of
Philology 61 (1940) 292-306 [electronic access via
FindIt@Sheffield]
Bailey D.
‘Excavating Dissoi Logoi 4’ Oxford Studies in Ancient
Philosophy 35 (2008) 249-264.
There is an online pdf version accessible via Dominic Bailey’s
University of Colorado homepage
http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/fac_bailey.shtml
4.
Socrates: General Reading
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://plato.stanford.edu/
Search for the articles on Socrates (by Deborah Nails) and on Plato’s Shorter Ethical
Works (by Paul Woodruff)
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
9
http://www.rep.routledge.com.eresources.shef.ac.uk/
Search for articles on Socrates (by John Cooper); Socratic Dialogues (by Charles
Kahn); Plato (by Malcolm Schofield: only sections 1-9 are relevant to this module)
For an overview of Plato’s life and works see
Rowe C
‘Plato’in D.Sedley (ed) Cambridge Companion To Greek And Roman
Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003) pp.98-124
online via http://www.shef.ac.uk/library/cdfiles/cco.html
For a selection of further general background reading there are the following
Beversluis J
Brickhouse T.C
Smith N.D.
Brickhouse, T.C.
Smith N.D.
Cross-examining Socrates : A Defense Of The Interlocutors In
Plato's Early Dialogues (Cambridge : Cambridge University
Press, 2000)
Socrates On Trial (Clarendon Press,
Commentary on Plato's Apology of Socrates
Oxford,
1989).
Routledge Philosophy Guidebook To Plato And The Trial Of
Socrates (Routledge, London, 2004)
Cooper J
‘Socrates and Philosophy as a Way of Life’ in Maieusis ed
Dominic Scott (OUP 2007) pp.20-43 [available via Library
eResources]
Dillon J
The Heirs of Plato (OUP 2003) chapter 1 [available via
Library eResources]
Frede M
‘Plato’s Arguments and the Dialogue Form’ in
Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues eds
N.D.Smith (Oxford Studies in Ancient
Supplementary Volume Clarendon Press, Oxford,
219.
Gulley N
The Philosophy Of Socrates (Macmillan, London, 1968 )
Guthrie, W. K. C
Socrates (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971)
Irwin T
Plato’s Ethics (OUP 1995) Chapters 1-2 [available via
Library eResources]
Methods of
J.C.Klagge,
Philosophy
1992) 201-
10
Irwin T
‘The Virtues: theory and Common Sense in Greek Philosophy’
in Essays on the Virtues ed R.Crisp (OUP 1998) pp.37-51
[available via Library eResources]
Kahn C.K.
Plato and the Socratic Dialogue (Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1996)
Santas, G.X.
Socrates: Philosophy In Plato's Early Dialogues (Routledge and
Kegan Paul, London, 1979)
Taylor C.C.W.
‘Socratic Ethics’ in Pleasure, Mind and Soul (OUP 2008)
pp.134-149 [available via Library eResources]
Vlastos G (ed)
The Philosophy Of Socrates : A Collection Of Critical Essays
(University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, 1980,
c1971: reprint of the ed. published by Anchor Books, Garden
City, N.Y., in series, Modern studies in philosophy)
Vlastos, G.
Socrates: Ironist And Moral Philosopher
University Press, Cambridge, 1991)
Waerdt van der P
The Socratic Movement (Cornell University Press, Ithaca and
London, 1994)
West T.G.
Plato's 'Apology of Socrates': An Interpretation, With A New
Translation (Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1979)
5.
(Cambridge
The Early Platonic Dialogues
Laches, Euthyphro, Charmides, Apology, Crito
Your best advice in reading and writing about these dialogues is to concentrate as
much as possible on the dialogues themselves. I have given additional reading on each
dialogue below. But the dialogues themselves are written in a plain and accessible
style, and presuppose no knowledge of philosophical technicality. If the material they
contain was supposed to be accessible to Socrates’ interlocutors then it should be
accessible also to you.
Laches
Burnyeat M.F ‘Virtues In Action’ in G.Vlastos (ed) The Philosophy Of Socrates
[available from background reading E-offprints]
Devereux D
‘Courage and Wisdom in Plato’s Laches’ Journal of the History of
Philosophy 15 (1977) 129-141 [electronic access via
FindIt@Sheffield]
11
Devereux D
‘The Unity of the Virtues in Plato’s Protagoras and Laches’
Philosophical Review 101 (1992) 765-789 [electronic access via
FindIt@Sheffield]
Irwin T
Plato’s Ethics (OUP 1995) Chapter 3 [available via Library
eResources]
Rabbas O
‘Definitions and Paradigms: Laches’ First Definition’ Phronesis 49
(2004) 143-168 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Santas G.X.
‘Socrates At Work On Virtue And Knowledge in Plato’s Laches’
Review Of Metaphysics 22 (1969) 433-460 [electronic access via
FindIt@Sheffield]
Euthyphro
Anderson A. ‘Socratic Reasoning in the Euthyphro’, Review of Metaphysics 22
(1969) 461-481 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Cohen S.M
‘Socrates On The Definition Of Piety’ Journal Of The History Of
Philosophy 9 (1971) 1-13 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Geach P.T.
‘Plato’s Euthyphro’ Logic Matters (Blackwell, Oxford, 1972) 31-44;
originally in Monist 50 (1966) 383-402 [available from background
reading E-offprints]
Holland
‘Euthyphro’ Proceedings Of The Aristotelian Society 82 (1981-82) 115 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
McPherran M ‘Socratic Piety in the Euthyphro’, Journal of the History of Philosophy
23 (1985), 283-309 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Santas G.X.
‘The Socratic Fallacy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 10 (1972),
127-141 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Taylor C.C.W.‘The End of the Euthyphro’ in Pleasure, Mind and Soul (OUP 2008)
pp.62-72 [available via Library eResources]
Charmides
Burnyeat M.F ‘Virtues In Action’ in G.Vlastos (ed) The Philosophy Of Socrates
[available from background reading E-offprints]
McCabe M
‘Looking Inside Charmides’ Cloak: Seeing Others and Oneself in
Plato’s Charmides’ in Maieusis ed D. Scott (OUP 2007) pp.1-19
[available via Library eResources]
12
McKim R.
‘Socratic Self-Knowledge and “Knowledge Of Knowledge” in Plato’s
Charmides’ Transactions Of The American Philological Association
115 (1985) 59-77 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Santas G.
‘Socrates At Work On Virtue And Knowledge In Plato’s Charmides’
in E.N.Lee et al (eds) Exegesis and Argument (Van Gorcum, Assen,
1973) [available as E-Offprint via Library myResource list]
Apology
Brickhouse T.C
Smith N.D. Socrates On Trial (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989). Commentary on
Plato's Apology of Socrates
Burnyeat M.F. ‘The Impiety of Socrates’ in T.C.Brickhouse and N.D.Smith (eds) The
Trial and Execution of Socrates (OUP 2002) pp.133-145; originally in
Ancient Philosophy 17 (1997) 1-12 [available from background
reading E-offprints]
Danzig G.
‘Apologizing For Socrates: Plato and Xenophon on Socrates’
Behaviour In Court’ Transactions Of The American Philological
Association 133 (2003) 281-321 [electronic access via
FindIt@Sheffield]
Gray V.J.
‘Xenophon’s Defence Of Socrates: The Rhetorical Background To The
Socratic Problem’ Classical Quarterly 39 (1989) 136-140 [electronic
access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Prior W.J.
‘The Historicity Of Plato’s Apology’ Polis 18 (2001) 41-57 [electronic
access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Santas G
Socrates (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1979) Chapter 2
[available from background reading E-offprints]
Crito
The following books concentrate on the issues raised in the Crito
Allen R.E.
Socrates And Legal Obligation (Minneapolis, 1980)
Kraut R.
Socrates And The State (Princeton, 1983)
Weiss R.
Socrates Dissatisfied (New York, 1998) [available via Library
eResources]
Woozley A.D. Law And Obedience (London, 1979)
There are also the following articles
13
Allen R.E.
‘Law And Justice In Plato’s Crito’ Journal of Philosophy 69 (1972)
557-567 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Congleton A. ‘Two Types Of Lawlessness: Plato’s Crito’ Polis 2 (1974) 432-446
[electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Danzig G.
‘Crito And The Socratic Controversy’ Polis 23 (2006) 21-45
[electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Euben J.P.
‘Philosophy And Politics In Plato’s Crito’ Political Theory 6 (1978)
149-172 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Farrell D.M. ‘Illegal Actions, Universal Maxims And The Duty To Obey The Law:
The Case For Civil Authority In The Crito’ Political Theory 6 (1978)
173-189 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Greenberg N. ‘Socrates’ Choice In The Crito’ Harvard Studies In Classical
Philology 70 (1965) 45-82 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Miller M.
‘”The Arguments I Seem To Hear” Argument And Irony In The Crito’
Phronesis
41
(1996)
121-137
[electronic
access
via
FindIt@Sheffield]
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://plato.stanford.edu/
Search for the article on Civil Disobedience (by Kimberley Brownlee)
While it is not clear how relevant the issue of civil disobedience is to the CritoSocrates debate, this article should be of interest in its own right.
6.
Plato’s Gorgias
There is a translation with full commentary (and bibliography) by Terence Irwin in
the Clarendon Plato Series
Irwin T
Plato: Gorgias (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979) [available via
Library eResources]
The Library has multiple print copies, and an electronic edition, of this book. You
would be wise to consult Irwin’s comments on any parts of the Gorgias on which you
plan to write in detail
There are also the following articles
Archie J.
‘Callicles’ Redoubtable Critique of the Polus Argument in Plato’s
‘Gorgias’’ Hermes 112 (1984) 167-176 [electronic access via
FindIt@Sheffield]
14
Doyle J
‘Socrates and Gorgias’ Phronesis 55 (2010) 1-25 [available as Eoffprint via Library PHI 223 myResource list]
Irwin T
Plato’s Ethics (OUP 1995) Chapters 7-8 [available via Library
eResources]
Johnson C.N. ‘Socrates’ Encounter With Polus in Plato’s Gorgias’ Phoenix 43
(1989) 196-216 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Kahn C.H.
‘Drama and Dialectic in Plato’s Gorgias’ Oxford Studies in Ancient
Philosophy 1 (1983) 75-121
Klosko G.
‘The Refutation of Callicles In Plato’s Gorgias’ Greece And Rome 31
(1984) 126-130 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
MacKenzie M.‘A Pyrrhic Victory: Gorgias 474b-477a’ Classical Quarterly 32 (1982)
84-88 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Race W.H.
‘Shame In Plato’s Gorgias’ Classical Journal 74 (1979) 197-202
[electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Rudebusch G Socrates, Pleasure and Value (OUP 2002) chapters 4-5 [available via
Library eResources]
Russell D
Plato on Pleasure and the Good Life (OUP 2005) chapter 2 [available
via Library eResources]
Sharples R.W ‘Plato on Democracy and Expertise’ Greece and Rome 41 (1984) 4956 [electronic access via FindIt@Sheffield]
Warman M.S ‘Plato and Persuasion’ Greece and Rome 30 (1983) 48-54 [electronic
access via FindIt@Sheffield]