Checklist for PowerPoint Project
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Section
Title page
Identify (5 marks)
Analyse (9 marks)
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Design (9 marks)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Implement (12 marks)
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Evaluate (5 marks)
Documentation
Student name, title of project and type of software
Section title
Background detail
User identified
Statement of the problem
Manual solution considered
Two alternative software solutions considered
Proposed solution justified
At least 3 quantitative objectives identified
Section title
Appropriate hardware identified
Appropriate software identified
Types and source of data explained (e.g. text information from
user, maps, scanned photographs)
Data manipulation explained (e.g. image manipulation in a
Paint package or spreadsheet/chart imported)
User input and navigation (e.g. menu, buttons) explained
Alternative methods of output considered (e.g. screen, printer,
speakers)
Choice of output method justified
Backup strategy identified
Security strategy (e.g. password) explained
Section title
Initial designs showing colour schemes, layout of slides and
navigation between slides
Menu structure diagram
User feedback on initial designs (comments, letter or
questionnaire results)
Final design for slides justified
Subtasks identified
Each slide sketched out, showing content and buttons
Security (e.g. password system) explained
Test plan containing at least 10 tests and expected results
Section title
Brief description of how the design was implemented,
explaining any changes that had to be made to the design
Hard copy of each slide, annotated to explain effects or
animations
Evidence that each test in the test plan was carried out,
comparing actual results with expected results.
When errors occurred, explain how they were corrected
Section title
Each original objective fully evaluated. Comment on how well
the objectives are fulfilled
Comment on any major problems that caused a change in
design
A critical comment on anything that you think could be
improved
User feedback in the form of a letter or questionnaire. User
comment should be critical and relevant
Evidence that you understand the user’s comments by making
suggestions for future improvements
Done