A Guided Tour of the Constitution I. A Brief Overview of the Structure: HAVE CLASS LOOK OVER THE CONSTITUTION AS YOU GO Article I – Legislative Branch Pay particular attention to Section 8 (powers of Congress), Section 9 (powers denied to Congress), and Section 10 (powers denied to the states) Article II – Executive Branch Article III – Judicial Branch Article IV – Relations between States (Full Faith and Credit) Article V – Process of Amending the Constitution Article VI – THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE – note that the Constitution proclaims itself the supreme law of the land Article VII – Ratification – Go over this as an introduction to the Federalist/Anti-Federalist Debate II. Comparing the Constitution to the Articles of Confederation Problem in the AOC “Firm League of Friendship” No Executive Branch No Federal Judiciary No power to tax States retain power to coin money No power to regulate trade No unified military Unanimous consent required for amending the Articles Central government not able to act directly on the people Enforcement of federal laws and treaties left to the states Remedy in the Constitution “More Perfect Union” (Preamble) Executive set forth in Article II Supreme Court established and provisions for establishing lower courts set forth in Article III Power granted to Congress in Article I, section 8 Congress granted power in Art. I, sec. 8; States denied that power in sec. 10 Congress given the power to regulate trade in Art. I, sec. 8 Congress can establish army/navy; President is Commander in Chief Rectified by Article V Rectified by the Supremacy Clause of Article VI Congress takes on this responsibility III.Major Compromises in the Constitution REPRESENTATION: Virginia Plan – supported by the larger states with large populations; called for a bicameral legislature in which both houses would be apportioned by population New Jersey Plan – supported by smaller states who were afraid that representation based on population would cause them to lose influence; supported a unicameral Congress in which there would equal representation for each state Result: Connecticut Compromise – put forth by Roger Sherman – bicameral legislature in which the lower house (House of Representatives) is based on population, and the upper house (Senate) would be apportioned equally Since equal representation won out in the upper house, the small states conceded that all bills for raising revenue would originate in the lower house Note also that the states determine the requirements for voting, which will be an integral part of democratization COMMERCE: Northern states wanted to make sure that the national government regulated interstate commerce and provided protection for international trade (since most of the shipping came out of the North); Southern states wanted to make sure that there were no taxes on their exports and wanted to make sure that there was a 2/3 vote on all regulations of trade Result: No taxation of exports (specifically prohibited); Congress retains the ability to regulate interstate trade and to make trade treaties for the whole nation (states are denied that power in Article I, Section 10) SLAVERY: One of the stickiest issues of the convention; a number of antislavery movements had already begun, but northern delegates need the support of southern states in order to make the whole thing work. There is also an issue of whether or not slaves count toward population; Southern states want them to count (because it will give them more representation in Congress), Northern states claim that if they can’t vote and aren’t citizens, they shouldn’t count Results: 1. 3/5 Compromise – 3/5 of all “other persons” will count toward the population of slave-holding states 2. The slave trade – the importation of slaves – was to be phased out after 20 years (1808) 3. The fugitive slave law – Article IV, Section 2 – as an extension of the concept of “full faith and credit” and extradition, slaves that escape to nonslave-holding states are to be returned to their owners in the states in which they were held Probably the biggest complaint against the Constitution in its early phases was its lack of a Bill of Rights; almost all of the states had them, but the Framers claimed that they had built into the document enough restraints to make sure that the federal government would not be able to abuse its citizens. THIS MAY BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE CONCEPTS OF SEPARATION (AND SHARING) OF POWERS, AND THE IDEA OF CHECKS AND BALANCES (I don’t know how in depth you want to go) One of the major focuses of the Federalist papers will be to outline these two ideas and explain how the system prevents abuses from any faction or position SOME ISSUES WITH THE BILL OF RIGHTS: Have students read the first five words of the First Amendment: “Congress shall pass no law…” Be sure to note that the protections set forth in the B.O.R. apply only to the national government, not the states – this will be the basis of states’ ability to regulate behaviors (for example, states can deny rights of slaves, or women, or whomever) Have students read Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 – explain the “elastic clause” and the powers that it gives the government – then have students read the Tenth Amendment Ask students to point out the inherent contradiction here: Loose Construction: relying on the “elastic clause” – claims that the federal government has the ability to do all things “necessary and proper” to function, even if it is not stated in the Constitution Northern states will embrace this because they (and their commerce) will benefit from infrastructure Strict Construction: relying on the Tenth Amendment – the federal government can only do what is explicitly set forth in the enumerated powers of Article I, Section 8 Southern states – and all supporters of states’ rights – will embrace this because it protects them from “tyranny” of the federal government and prevents the government from interfering with slavery AS MUCH AS I HATE TO SAY THIS AT THIS JUNCTURE OF THE SEMESTER, the seeds of the Civil War were planted in the Constitution itself