Assessment in the IB Diploma Programme Assessment of performance in the IB Diploma Programme is different from that of the German school system in many ways. The IB assessment scheme shows 7 grades: Grade 7 Grade 6 Grade 5 Grade 4 * Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Excellent performance Very good performance Good performance Satisfactory performance * Mediocre performance Poor performance Very poor performance * Grade 4 = Minimum grade required for each subject by the Standing Conference of German Ministers of Education for university recognition of the IB Diploma One subject may be awarded grade three if in a subject at the same or higher level 5 grades are reached. The final grade is composed of External Assessment (EA) (undertaken by especially trained IB examiners) and of Internal Assessment (IA) by the teachers of the school, which can be moderated (altered!) by external examiners. Depending on the different subjects, External Assessment amounts to 70 – 80 %. Thus IA by the teachers carries considerably less weight than in the German system. BUT: Assessment by the teacher is much more significant than these percentages seem to express. First, weeks before the final written exams teachers are required to submit Predicted Grades (PG) to the IB. Second, foreign universities often require PGs, too. Oral grades are of little importance for PGs to both institutions. Mock exams and the subject-specific types of IA are the major basis for calculating the PGs. The main difference between PGs to the IB and to universities is the time at which they must be provided and submitted: to the IB in April before the exams, to universities at times fixed by the universities, mostly already in December. The school must be informed in a written form well before December if students need PGs for university applications. All PGs serve the same purpose: They are supposed to give honest and reliable information on the expected exam results. They may be optimistic up to a justifiable point. One good reason for handing in an EE by the respective deadline is the fact that additional grades earned in an EE and the TOK essay can be included in the total of the Predicted Grades. Teachers are required to submit Predicted Grades to the IB considering all aspects relevant to the final grade. The examiners get these PGs but can arrive at a different assessment (moderation). The same is true for IA. Foreign universities often require PGs for the selection process among applicants. Deadlines for submitting these PGs differ from country to country, even from university to university. It is the responsibility of the student to make sure deadlines can be met and the required information is sent to universities in time. The report cards are solely based on assessment by the teacher. These are mainly a form of feedback to parents and students. When calculating the PGs report card grades are of significance to a minor degree. Report Cards (Zwischengutachten) are issued at the end of the first three semesters respectively and have to be signed by a parent / legal guardian, even in the case when a student is of legal age. Signatures must be shown to the tutor (when classes are resumed) to prove that parents are informed on the student’s state of learning and the level of achievement. For the calculation of the report card grades the following are considered: mock exams, written homework and oral participation. Oral participation amounts to 25 – 50% of the total. Even though oral participation carries little weight for the assessment procedure, its significance is much bigger than becomes obvious at first sight. It would be a total misinterpretation of the assessment process to believe that cramming information into your brains during the last weeks before the written exams could make up for all those things neglected over the previous course time. Firstly, the precious time before the exams is necessary for revision (and relaxation!). Secondly, it is just impossible to simply learn what has not been understood so far. Understanding matters and issues, putting them into a wider context, developing one’s own views and reasoned arguments does not only require knowledge but also practice, lots of practice, and this cannot be obtained by merely listening (if at all). Developing these skills is a very personal and active process over a long period of time. Procrastination and a belief in some fortunate kind of intuition are clear signs of immaturity and naivety. And a final remark: a lot of work done during the course counts to the final grade, i.e. getting knowledgeable, inquisitive, skilled and experienced at the very end is just t o o l a t e !