IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Project
IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16>
Title
Proposal for multi-hop relay simulation test scenario in Relay Evaluation Methodology
Date
Submitted
2009-01-07
Source(s)
Young-il Kim, Perumal Ramesh Babu,
Jisoo Park, Khishigjargal
ETRI
161 Gajeong-dong Yuseong-gu, Taejeon
305-700, Korea
Kyu Ha Lee
Samsung Thales
San-14, Nongseo-Dong, Giheung-Gu,
Yongin , Gyeonggi-Do, Korea 446-712
Suk Chan Kim, Dong Heon Lee
Pusan National University
Jangjeon-dong, Geumjeong-gu, Busan,
Voice: +82 42 860 5399 (Young-il Kim)
+82 42 860 1755 (Perumal Ramesh Babu)
+82 42 860 5748 (Jisoo Park)
+82 42 860 1779 (Khishigjargal)
E-mail: yikim@etri.re.kr (Young-il Kim)
ramesh.babu@etri.re.kr(Perumal Ramesh
Babu)
jsp@etri.re.kr (Jisoo Park)
khishig@etri.re.kr (Khishigjargal)
Voice: +82-31-280-9917
Fax : +82-31-280-1620
E-mail: kyuha.lee@samsung.com
Voice: +82 51 510 2380 (Suk Chan Kim)
+82 51 515 5190
E-mail: sckim@pusan.ac.kr(Suk Chan Kim)
leedheon@pusan.ac.kr(Dong Heon Lee)
609-735, Korea
Re:
Change Request for 16m EMD
Abstract
Relay evaluation methodology was accepted in #57 meeting. In this evaluation methodology,
throughput enhancement scenario was included without the test scenario for cell coverage
extension evaluation. In this document we define the scenario for cell coverage extension
evaluation.
Purpose
For consideration and adoption into the 16m EMD document.
Notice
Release
This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It
represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for
discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material
contained herein.
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution,
and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name
any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole
discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The
contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Patent
Policy
The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures:
<http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and
<http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>.
Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and
<http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat>.
Proposal for multi-hop relay simulation test scenario in Relay
Evaluation Methodology
Young-il Kim, Perumal Ramesh Babu, Jisoo Park, Khishigjargal
ETRI
Kyu Ha Lee
Samsung Thales
Suk Chan Kim, Dong Heon Lee
Pusan National University
Introduction
Relay evaluation methodology was accepted within 16m EMD in #57 meeting. In this evaluation
methodology, test scenario was included for ART(Above Rooftop) RS. The test scenario mainly was focused on
the evaluation of throughput enhancement. The goal of Relay is for cell throughput enhancement and cell
coverage extension. Therefore the test scenario for cell coverage extension has to be included. The test
scenarios had been evaluated in [2]. In this document we define the scenario for cell coverage extension
evaluation.
Text Proposal
[Insert the following text as section 14 of the 16m EMD document:]
14.1. Test Scenarios
Two basic scenarios with Relay Stations (RS) are defined for the purpose of system level simulations:
 Above Rooftop (ART) RS scenario
o Two relays per sector
 Below Rooftop (BRT) RS scenario
o Six relays per sector (1.5 km BS site-to-site distance)
o TBD relays per sector (3.0 km BS site-to-site distance)
 Manhattan deployment scenario (Optional)
 Scenarios according to the purpose of RS deployments (Optional)
o Throughput enhancement scenario
 Two relays per sector
o Coverage extension scenario
 Cell edge and outside scenario
 Artificial Shadow Region (ASR) scenario
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
o Mobile vehicle usage scenario
14.1.1.
14.1.1.1.
Above Rooftop RS Scenario
Two Relays per Sector
In this scenario two RSs are deployed in each sector. The positions of the relays are determined by
the BS-RS distance r and the angle  between the boresight direction of the BS sector antenna and
the LOS to the RS (refer to Figure 28). By default the distance r is equal to 3/8 of the site-to-site
distance and the angle  is 26º. A value of 30º may optionally be used. Note that specified
recommended values of r and  are currently aligned for DL spatial multiplexing of relay links
assuming that the BS is equipped with 4 antenna elements and antenna spacing equals 4
wavelengths. The values of r and  for the BS equipped with 2 antenna elements are TBD. The
optional parameters are aligned with the case when no beamforming and spatial multiplexing
techniques are applied. The defined values for r and  are not obligatory and may be changed for
other simulation scenarios, but in this case their values must be specified by the proponents. The
particular choice may be justified by specific BS antenna system parameters (i.e., antenna spacing
and number of antenna elements) and used signal processing techniques. For instance, the angles
may be selected to reduce the amount of interference from neighboring cells or to increase the
performance of spatially multiplexed relay links for a given BS antenna configuration.
14.1.2.
Below Rooftop RS Scenario
14.1.3.
Manhattan deployment scenario
14.1.4.
Scenarios according to the purpose of RS deployment (Optional)
Relay Stations (RSs) may be deployed to provide improved coverage and/or capacity. It is necessary
to evaluate the system performance based on the purpose of RS deployment. The 802.16j provided
harmonized contribution on multi-hop relay usage models [4] and the purpose of usage models is to
define different deployment scenarios. Some examples of RS deployment are illustrated in Figure 36.
This section provides three scenarios from the purpose of RS deployment based on usage models
and channel models by using the previous ART or BRT scenario.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Cell Outside
Multihop Relay
RS
RS
Coverage
Hole
Shadow of
buildings
RS
RS
RS
BS
Penetration into
inside building
Mobile RS
RS
RS
Cell Edge
Valley between
buildings
Figure 36: RS Usage Model
14.1.4.1.
Throughput Enhancement Scenario
Fixed RSs are deployed to enhance throughputs and to improve capacity. In this scenario, RS
allocation and the assumptions are same with ART RS and BRT RS scenario as described in the
Section 14.1.1.
14.1.4.2.
Coverage Extension Scenario
14.1.4.2.1.
Cell Edge and Outside Scenario
For the evaluation of cell coverage extension, two or three RSs in each sector to configure multi hop
link are deployed. Distances between BSs are widened and RSs are positioned at the edge and
outside of the BS coverage as shown in figure 36. Figure 37 illustrates the deployment scenario with
ART RSs placement more specifically. First and second sector has three RSs but third sector has two
RSs. In this topology, rcell denotes the cell radius covered by the BS and R is the site-to-site distance.
The positions of bth relay of ath sector are determined by the distance rab and the angle ab between
the boresight direction of the BS sector antenna and the LOS to the RS. By default, distances r11, r21,
and r31 is 3/8 of R and r12, r22, and r32 is 4/8 of site-to-site distance, and r13, and r23 is 1 3 of site-tosite distance.
Angles 11, 12, 21, 22, 31, and 32 are 0 º, 13 is 30 º, and 23 is -30º. (refer to Figure
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
37). We find that this topology can cover whole outside of BS coverage as shown in the centre cell.
The defined values for rab and ab are not obligatory and may be changed for other simulation
scenarios, but in this case their values must be specified by the proponents and be able to cover
whole outside of BS coverage.
BS
ART RSs
Figure 37: Scenario with RS deployments at the edge and the outside of the cell (19 cell)
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Rcell
r22
φ23
φ13
r32
r11
r23
R
BS
ART RSs in the sector 1
2nd sector ART RSs
3rd sector ART RSs
Figure 38: Three RSs in the first and second sector and two RSs in the third sector
14.1.4.2.2.
Artificial Shadow Region (ASR) Scenario
This scenario is also for the evaluation of coverage extension. The RS can provide service for users
in coverage holes that exist due to deep-shadow fading and in valleys between buildings. Shadow
fading values for MSs, located in the ASR, are artificially raised above the threshold, which depends
on the shadow fading model. Positions of ASR are determined by the same as the way described in
Section 14.1.1.1 and RSs are located in that region. Figure 39 and Figure 40 illustrates the
deployment scenario with two ASRs and two ART RSs per sector. The radius rASR of ASR may be
calculated by
A R 
1
  rASR 2
N
where, A is the cell area(km2), R is the constant that can be determined from the threshold value of
the magnitude of shadow fading, and N denotes the number of ASR per cell.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
BS
ART RSs
Figure 39: Two ASR and ART deployment scenario (19 cell)
BS – RS distance
r
Angle between RS location and
BS antenna boresight direction
φ
φ
BS antenna boresight direction
r
Artificial shadow region
BS
rASR
ART RSs
Artificial shadow region
Figure 40: Two ASR and ART deployment scenario
Figure 41 (a) shows the example of shadow fading generated by spatial correlation model [3], and (b)
is the CDF of shadow fading. R can be obtained by determining the threshold in the CDF. If the
magnitude of shadow fading of ASR is higher than the threshold value of 15dB, then R is 3 %.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Empirical CDF
1
X: 15
Y: 0.9706
0.9
0.8
0.7
F(x)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-30
(a)
Figure 41:
-20
-10
0
10
shadow fading (dB)
20
30
(b)
shadow fading (a) magnitude(dB) (b) CDF (standard deviation : 8dB)
14.1.4.3.
Mobile Vehicle Usage Scenario
In the urban environment, signal to MSs on a mobile vehicle are suffered from time varying channel
and handovers between adjacent cells are often failed. A mobile RS (MRS) mounted on the vehicle
can provide more reliable link to those MSs. In Figure 42, one MRS is randomly dropped in each
sector and their locations are uniformly distributed. MRSs are given a random trajectory and speed.
Handover must be supported for MRS during the simulation time and the performance of MRS
handover can be evaluated as described in the Section 8. The combination of channel type and
velocity for MRS must be defined like MS case as defined in Table 3, but proportion of higher speed
must be increased. It is defined in Table 62. While MSs served by MRS can received a sufficient
signal, MRS transmission may be an interference signal to MSs served by BS or fixed RS. Hence,
effect of MRS interference can be analyzed and the number of MRS may be adjusted. Transmission
power, frequency reuse, and scheduling scheme may also be adjusted to reduce interference, but in
this case their values must be specified by the proponents. Fixed infrastructure of two relays per
sector scenario is used for the performance evaluation of MRS in Figure 42, but any other scenario
can be used for other simulation.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
BS
ART RSs
Mobile RSs
Figure 42: Example : One MRS per sector in the two fixed relays per sector scenario
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
14.2.
Basic Parameters
Scenario/ parameters
ART RS
scenario
BRT RS
scenario
Refer to Baseline configuration
Carrier Frequency
(Table 3)
Refer to Baseline configuration
Operating Bandwidth
(Table 3)
Frequency Reuse
Number of RS per sector
Manhattan
deployment
scenario
1x3x1 (required)*
6 (1.5 km site-to-site
distance)
2**
1,2,3
6-12 (3.0 km site-tosite distance)
1.5km (mandatory)
1.5 km
(mandatory)
3.0km (optional)
3.0 km
(optional)
RS placement distance (r)
2 RSs per sector –
3/8 of site-to-site
distance
6 RSs per
sector –
symmetrical
positioning
(hexagonal)
TBD
RS placement angle ( )
2 RSs per sector 26° (Default); 30°
(Optional)
6 RSs per
sector –
symmetrical
positioning
(hexagonal)
TBD
BS Site-to-site distance
Refer to Baseline configuration
MS mobility
Scenario/ parameters
TBD
(Table 3)
Cell Edge and
Outside
Scenario
ASR Scenario
Mobile
Vehicle Usage
Scenario
(optional)
(optional)
Carrier Frequency
Operating Bandwidth
(optional)
Refer to Baseline configuration
(Table 3)
Refer to Baseline configuration
(Table 3)
Frequency Reuse
Number of RS per sector
BS Site-to-site distance
RS placement distance (r)
1x3x1 (required)*
3 (2.0 km site-to-site
distance), 3 hops
1 MRS per sector
2**
Fixed RS –
according to other
scenario
2.0km (mandatory)
1.5km (mandatory)
3.0km (optional)
3.0km (optional)
According to other
scenario
3/8, 4/8, 1/ 3 of
site-to-site
distance(2.0 km
site-to-site distance)
2 RSs per sector –
3/8 of site-to-site
distance
Fixed RS –
according to other
scenario
5 (3.0 km site-to-site
distance), 4 hops
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
2/8, 3/8, 4/8,
1 3 , 3 3 4 , of
site-to-site
distance(3.0 km
site-to-site distance)
RS placement angle ( )
MS mobility
0°, 30°, -30°
2 RSs per sector 26° (Default); 30°
(Optional)
Fixed RS –
according to other
scenario
Refer to Baseline configuration
(Table 3)
Table 46: Test Scenarios
* In a frequency reuse pattern of NxSxK, the network is divided into clusters of N cells (each cell in the cluster has a different frequency allocations),
S sectors per cell, and K different frequency allocations per cell.
**Two RSs per sector are recommend here because the other parameters(e.g. RS placement distance, RS placement angle) are dependant on the
number of RS.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Parameter
Value
ART RS and BRT RS scenario
BS Tx Power per sector
Refer to Table 4
Base station antenna height
Refer to Table 4
Manhattan deployment scenario
(optional)
46 dBm (Refer to Table 4)
36 dBm (optional)
12.5m
Number of transmit antennas
per sector
2 (Mandatory)
Number of receive antennas per
sector
2 (Mandatory)
4 (Optional)
4 (Optional)
Number of sectors
Refer to Table 4
4 (oriented along the streets)
Antenna gain (boresight)
Refer to Table 4
TBD
Antenna 3-dB beamwidth
Refer to Table 4
TBD
Antenna front-to-back power
ratio
Antenna spacing
30 dB (Mandatory)
TBD
20 dB (Optional)
(Refer to Table 4 )
4λ (Mandatory) (Refer to Table 4)
0.5λ (Optional)
Noise figure
Refer to Table 4
Cable loss
Refer to Table 4
Parameter
Value
Cell Edge and Outside, ASR Scenario, and Mobile Vehicle Usage (optional)
BS Tx Power per sector
Refer to Table 4
Base station antenna height
Refer to Table 4
Number of transmit antennas
per sector
2 (Mandatory)
Number of receive antennas per
sector
2 (Mandatory)
Number of sectors
Refer to Table 4
Antenna gain (boresight)
Antenna 3-dB beamwidth
Antenna front-to-back power
ratio
Antenna spacing
4 (Optional)
4 (Optional)
Refer to Table 4
TBD
Refer to Table 4
TBD
30 dB (Mandatory)
20 dB (Optional)
(Refer to Table 4 )
4λ (Mandatory) (Refer to Table 4)
0.5λ (Optional)
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Noise figure
Refer to Table 4
Cable loss
Refer to Table 4
Table 47: BS Equipment Model
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Value
Parameter
ART RS scenario
BRT RS scenario
Manhattan deployment
scenario (optional)
Relay Link
36 dBm per antenna
(Mandatory)
RS Tx Power
36 dBm per antenna
27 dBm per antenna
Relay station antenna height
32 m
10m
10 m
Number of transmit antennas
1
2
1
Number of receive antennas
1
2
1
Antenna type
Directional
Omni in horizontal plane
Directional
Antenna gain (boresight)
20 dBi
7 dBi
20 dBi
Antenna 3-dB beamwidth
200
N/A
200
Antenna front-to-back power ratio
23 dB
N/A
23 dB
Antenna spacing
N/A
2λ
N/A
Antenna orientation
Antenna array broadside
pointed to BS direction
Antenna array broadside
pointed to BS direction
27 dBm per antenna
(Optional)
Antenna array broadside
Noise figure
5 dB
Cable loss
2 dB
pointed to the link’s source
direction (BS or another
RS)
Access Link
RS Tx Power
36 dBm per antenna
27 dBm per antenna
36 dBm per antenna
(Mandatory)
27 dBm per antenna
(Optional)
Relay station antenna height
32m
10m
10 m
Number of transmit antennas
2 baseline/ 4 optional
TBD
Number of receive antennas
2 baseline/ 4 optional
TBD
Number of sectors
1
4 oriented along the
streets (or less)
Antenna type
Omni in horizontal plane
Directional
Antenna gain (boresight)
7 dBi
TBD
Antenna 3-dB beamwidth
N/A
N/A
TBD
Antenna front-to-back power ratio
N/A
N/A
TBD
Antenna spacing
4λ
2λ
TBD
Antenna orientation
Antenna array broadside
pointed to BS direction
Antenna array broadside
pointed to BS direction
TBD
Noise figure
5 dB
Cable loss
2 dB
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Value
Parameter
Cell Edge and
Outside Scenario
ASR Scenario
*Mobile Vehicle
Usage Scenario
Relay Link
RS Tx Power
36 dBm per antenna
27 dBm per antenna
Relay station antenna height
32 m
3m
Number of transmit antennas
1
2
2 baseline/ 4 optional
Number of receive antennas
1
2
2 baseline/ 4 optional
Antenna type
Directional
Omni directional
Antenna gain (boresight)
20 dBi
7 dBi
Antenna 3-dB beamwidth
200
N/A
Antenna front-to-back power ratio
23 dB
N/A
Antenna spacing
N/A
N/A
Antenna orientation
Antenna array broadside pointed to BS direction
N/A
Noise figure
5 dB
7 dB
Cable loss
2 dB
0 dB
Access Link
RS Tx Power
36 dBm per antenna
23 dBm per antenna
Relay station antenna height
32m
3m
Number of transmit antennas
2 baseline/ 4 optional
2
Number of receive antennas
2 baseline/ 4 optional
2
Number of sectors
1
1
Antenna type
Omni in horizontal plane
Omni directional
Antenna gain (boresight)
7 dBi
7 dBi
Antenna 3-dB beamwidth
N/A
N/A
Antenna front-to-back power ratio
N/A
N/A
4λ
Antenna spacing
2λ
2λ
Antenna orientation
Antenna array broadside pointed to BS direction
N/A
Noise figure
5 dB
5 dB
Cable loss
2 dB
0 dB
Table 48: RS Equipment Model
*Parameters for mobile vehicle usage scenario are MRS’s.
14.3. Channel Models
This section describes the channel models used to model propagation conditions between BS, RS,
and MS for two the different RS deployment scenarios – ART RS and BRT RS. Note that whole of the
channel models for optional Throughput Enhancement Scenario are same with those of ART RS
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
scenario.
14.3.1.
Pathloss Models
14.3.1.1.
ART RS Scenario
14.3.1.2.
BRT RS Scenario
14.3.1.3.
Manhattan deployment scenario (optional)
14.3.1.4.
Scenarios according to the purpose of RS deployment (optional)
14.3.1.4.1.
Throughput enhancement and Cell Edge and Outside scenario
The pathloss models for the Throughput Enhancement and Cell Edge and Outside scenario are
same with those of ART RS scenario.
14.3.1.4.2.
ASR scenario
Pathloss models for the ASR scenario are defined in TableX1.
Link
BS-MS
Pathloss model
Baseline test scenario (Mandatory) (Refer to Section Error! Reference source not found.)
Urban Macrocell test scenario (Optional) (Refer to Section Error! Reference source not found.).
MSs which are not
in the ASR
Baseline test scenario (Mandatory) (Refer to Section Error! Reference source
not found.)
Urban Macrocell test scenario (Optional) (Refer to Section Error! Reference
source not found.).
Urban Microcell propagation :
Urban Microcell COST-Walfish-Ikegami pathloss model (Mandatory) Error!
Reference source not found.Error! Reference source not found.
RS-MS
MSs in the ASR
Urban Microcell test scenario pathloss model (Optional) (Refer to Section Error!
Reference source not found.)
Outdoor to Indoor propagation : Outdoor to Indoor test scenario pathloss model
(Optional) (Refer to Section Error! Reference source not found.)
BS-RS and
RS-RS
802.16j EVM Type H (Mandatory) [81]
Table X1: Path loss models for ASR Scenario
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
14.3.1.4.3.
BS-MS and RS-MS links
The BS-MS link for the ASR scenario is typical ART to BRT links of the ART RS scenario. The RSMS links for the MSs which are not in the ASR is also typical ART to BRT link. In this scenario, we
assume that RS provides service for MSs in coverage holes, shadow of buildings, and valleys
between buildings or for MSs in buildings. For MSs in the ASR, two propagation sub-scenarios for
RS-MS links are considered as those of the BRT RS scenario. The Urban Microcell propagation
scenario is used where MSs are located outdoors, and the Outdoor to Indoor propagation scenario is
used where MSs are located inside the buildings.
14.3.1.4.4.
BS-RS and RS-RS links
BS-RS and RS-RS links are assumed to be Urban LOS ART to ART links. RS is assumed to be
located above rooftop and at the region suffered from deep shadow fading in the urban. Since there
are no suitable channel model scenarios defined in Section Error! Reference source not found.,
the pathloss models described in the 802.16j EVM Error! Reference source not found. is used.
IEEE 802.16j EVM Type H model is detremind by the COST 231 Walfish-Ikegami pathloss model
Error! Reference source not found., Error! Reference source not found., but excluding the
rooftop-to-MS diffraction loss term and modifying the multiscreen diffraction loss term [81].
14.3.1.4.5.
Mobile vehicle usage scenario
Pathloss models for the mobile vehicle usage scenario are defined in Table X2.
Link
Pathloss model
WINNER C4 [82] with urban macrocell (Mandatory) (Refer to Section Error! Reference source
not found.3.2.3.6)
BS-MRS and RS-MRS
WINNER D1 and D2a, rural macrocell (Optional) [82]
802.16j EVM Type J (Optional) [83]
MRS-MS
Indoor small office (Mandatory) (Refer to Section Error! Reference source not found.3.2.3.4)
WINNER D2b (Optional) [82]
Table X2: Pathloss models for the Mobile vehicle usage scenario
14.3.1.4.6.
BS-MRS and RS-MRS links
When MRS is mounted in the ceiling of a mobile vehicle, BS-MRS and RS-MRS links are
considered – the outdoor to Indoor propagation in the urban macrocell environment which is defined
in the WINNER C4 model [83]. The outdoor propagation of the C4 model can be modeled by
mandatory pathloss models for the baseline and optional Urban Macrocell. When a mobile vehicle
moves in high speed (~350 km/h) in the optional rural macrocell test scenario, WINNER D1 and D2a
can be used for the BS-MRS and RS-MRS links. For simplicity, the pathloss models described in the
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
802.16j EVM[81] can be optionally used.
14.3.1.4.7.
MRS-MS links
When MRS is mounted to the ceiling in the vehicle, MRS-MS links is assumed to be Indoor small
office described in Section 3.2.3.4. Optionally, WINNER D2b (Same as WINNER A1 NLOS) [82]
which is applicable in the high speed environment inside the fast train carriage can be used.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
14.3.2.
Spatial channel models
14.3.2.1.
ART RS scenario
14.3.2.2.
BRT RS scenario
14.3.2.3.
Manhattan deployment scenario (optional)
14.3.2.4.
Scenarios according to the purpose of RS deployment (optional)
14.3.2.4.1.
Throughput enhancement and Cell Edge and Outside scenario
The spatial channel models for the Throughput Enhancement and Cell Edge and Outside scenario
are same with that of scenario.
14.3.2.4.2.
ASR scenario
Link
BS-MS
Spatial Channel Models
MSs which are not in
the ASR
MSs in the ASR
BS-RS and
RS-RS
Baseline test scenario model (Mandatory) (Refer to Section Error! Reference
source not found.)
Urban Macrocell test scenario model (Optional) (Refer to Section Error!
Reference source not found.).
Bad Urban Macrocell (Mandatory) (Refer to Section 3.2.5.1)
WINNER B5a model Error! Reference source not found.Error! Reference source not found.
MSs which are not in
the ASR
RS-MS
MSs in the ASR
Baseline test scenario model (Mandatory) (Refer to Section Error! Reference
source not found.)
Urban Macrocell test scenario model (Optional) (Refer to Section Error!
Reference source not found.).
Urban Microcell propagation : Bad Urban Microcell (Mandatory) (Refer to
Section 3.2.5.3)
Outdoor to Indoor propagation : Outdoor to Indoor test scenario model
(Optional) (Refer to Section Error! Reference source not found.)
Table X3: Spatial channel models for ASR Scenario
14.3.2.4.3.
BS-MS link
The mandatory baseline and optional Urban Macrocell and Suburban Macrocell test scenario spatial
channel models described in Section Error! Reference source not found. are used for BS-MS link
simulations in which MSs are not in the ASR. For the MSs in the ASR, the Bad Urban Macrocell CDL
model is used for BS-MS links, and the CDL parameters are given in Table 11.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
14.3.2.4.4.
BS-RS and RS-RS links
The WINNER B5a CDL model is used as the spatial channel model for BS-RS and RS-RS links.
Error! Reference source not found. and Table provide a short summary of the parameters
associated with this channel model.
14.3.2.4.5.
RS-MS links
The mandatory baseline and optional Urban Macrocell and Suburban Macrocell test scenario spatial
channel models described in Section Error! Reference source not found. are used for BS-MS link
simulations in which MSs are not in the ASR. For the MSs in the ASR, the mandatory Bad Urban
Microcell CDL model and the optional Outdoor to Indoor spatial channel models described in Section
Error! Reference source not found. can be used for RS-MS link simulations without any
modifications. The CDL parameters are given in Table 15.
14.3.2.4.6.
Mobile vehicle usage scenario
Link
Spatial Channel Models
BS-MRS and RS-MRS
WINNER C4, outdoor to indoor macrocell [82] (Mandatory) (Refer to Section Error! Reference
source not found.3.2.3.6)
WINNER D1 and D2a, rural macrocell (Optional) [82]
MRS-MS
Indoor small office (Mandatory) (Refer to Section Error! Reference source not found.3.2.3.4)
WINNER D2b (Optional)
Table X4: Spatial channel models for Mobile vehicle usage scenario
14.3.2.4.6.1.
BS-MRS and MRS-MS links
The WINNER C4 NLOS CDL model is used as the spatial channel model for BS-MRS and RS-MRS
links for the the outdoor to Indoor propagation in the urban macrocell environment. The CDL
parameters of this model are given in the Table X5. For the high speed rural environment test
scenario, The WINNER D1(0-200 km/h), D2a(0-350km/h) CDL model is used as the spatial channel
model for BS-MRS and RS-MRS links. Table X6 , Table X7, and Table X8 provide a short summary
of the parameters associated with this channel model.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
5
10
-3.0
-5.2
-16.8
AoD [°]
AoA [º]
0
0
Ray power [dB]
-0.23
-22.8
2
15
-20.6
17
44
-28.5
3
95
-26.8
17
-45
-29.2
4
145
18
-48
-25.3
5
195
-20.5
-19
50
-33.5
6
65
-18.9
18
-48
-31.9
7
65
-21.1
-19
51
-34.2
8
90
-23.6
-20
-54
-36.6
9
125
-26.1
-22
57
-39.1
10
180
-29.4
23
60
-42.4
11
190
-28.3
-22
59
-41.3
-24.2
-17.5
-19.2
XPR = 12dB
0
Power [dB]
Cluster ASA= 3°
1
Delay [ns]
Cluster ASD= 2°
Cluster #
Table X5: WINNER C4 NLOS CDL channel model, outdoor to indoor (urban) macro-cell
5
10
AoD [°]
AoA [º]
-15.0
0
0
0.0
-16.8
Ray power [dB]
-0.23
-22.8
2
20
-20.6
17
44
-28.5
3
20
-26.8
17
-45
-29.2
18
-48
-25.3
4
25
30
35
-24.2
-17.5
-19.2
5
45
-20.5
-19
50
-33.5
6
65
-18.9
18
-48
-31.9
7
65
-21.1
-19
51
-34.2
8
90
-23.6
-20
-54
-36.6
9
125
-26.1
-22
57
-39.1
10
180
-29.4
23
60
-42.4
11
190
-28.3
-22
59
-41.3
Table X6: WINNER D1 LOS CDL channel model, rural environment
XPR = 12dB
0
Power [dB]
Cluster ASA= 3°
1
Delay [ns]
Cluster ASD= 2°
Cluster #
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
0
5
10
-3.0
-5.2
AoD [°]
AoA [º]
Ray power [dB]
0
0
-13.0
-7.0
2
0
-1.8
-8
28
-14.8
3
5
-3.3
-10
38
-16.3
15
-55
-14.8
4
10
15
20
-4.8
-7.0
-8.8
5
20
-5.3
13
48
-18.3
6
25
-7.1
15
-55
-20.1
7
55
-9.0
-17
62
-22.0
8
100
-4.2
-12
42
-17.2
9
170
-12.4
20
-73
-25.4
10
420
-26.5
29
107
-39.5
XPR = 7 dB
1
Power [dB]
Cluster ASA= 3°
Delay [ns]
Cluster ASD= 2°
Cluster #
Table X7: WINNER D1 NLOS CDL channel model for clusters, rural environment
Cluster #
Delay [ns]
Power [dB]
AoD [°]
AoA [º]
1
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.7
-80.0
-27.8
55
-17.8
-20.1
-21.8
5
60
-17.2
-13.6
86.0
-30.2
6
85
-16.5
13.4
84.4
-29.5
-13.9
87.5
-28.1
7
100
105
110
-18.1
-20.4
-22.1
8
115
-15.7
-13.0
-82.2
-28.7
9
130
-17.7
-13.9
87.5
-30.8
10
210
-17.3
13.7
86.2
-30.3
XPR = 12 dB
50
-28.8
Cluster ASA= 3°
45
-0.12
Cluster ASD= 2°
4
Ray power [dB]
Table X8: WINNER D2 LOS CDL channel model, rural environment
14.3.2.4.6.2.
MRS-MS links
Indoor small office described in Section 3.2.3.4 can be used for MRS-MS link simulations. If the
MRS is assumed to be located in the ceiling of the carriage and it is assumed that there are chairs
and tables densely as usual in train carriages, this makes that typically there is NLOS connection
between the MRS and MSs. In this case, WINNER D2b (Same as WINNER A1 NLOS) can be used
optionally.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
14.3.3.
Shadowing models
The shadowing factor (SF) has a log-normal distribution with a standard deviation that is different for
different scenarios as shown in Table. The values specified in Table have been derived based on the
baseline model in this document, 802.16j EVM Error! Reference source not found., SCM, and
WINNER models.
In the ART RS scenario for BS-MS and RS-MS links, the shadowing standard deviation is 8 dB
according to Section Error! Reference source not found.. For BS-RS and RS-RS links, the
shadowing standard deviation is 3.4 dB according to the 802.16j EVM Type D Error! Reference
source not found. and WINNER B5a channel models Error! Reference source not found..
In the BRT RS scenario for the BS-MS link the shadowing standard deviation is 8 dB according to
Section Error! Reference source not found.. For the BS-RS link “pre-planned” RS placement by
operators is assumed so the shadowing standard deviation is set to 6 dB and the mean value of the
shadowing factor is set to 2 dB providing a positive shift in log-normal curve. This ensures better
propagation conditions than for typical BS-MS links in which MSs are assumed to be randomly
located. For the RS-MS (in the Urban Microcell scenario) and RS-RS links, the shadowing standard
deviation is 4 dB for NLOS and 3 dB for LOS propagation according to Section Error! Reference
source not found. and the WINNER Urban Microcell channel models Error! Reference source not
found.. For the Outdoor-to-Indoor test scenario RS-MS link shadowing standard deviation is 7 dB
according to Section Error! Reference source not found..
In the Manhattan deployment scenario for the BS-MS, RS-MS links with Urban Microcell propagation
conditions and BS-RS, RS-RS links, the shadowing standard deviation is 4 dB for NLOS and 3 dB for
LOS propagation according to Section Error! Reference source not found..and the WINNER
models Error! Reference source not found.. For the BS-MS and RS-MS links with Outdoor-toIndoor propagation conditions shadowing standard deviation is 7 dB according to Section Error!
Reference source not found..
In the Cell Edge and Outside scenario and ASR scenario for all of links, shadowing standard
deviations are same with those of ART RS scenario.
In the Mobile Vehicle Usage scenario for BS-RS, BS-MS, and RS-MS links, assuming that the fixed
infrastructure is composed of ART RS scenario, then shadowing standard deviations are same with
those of ART RS scenario. If the fixed infrastructure is chosen to BRT RS or Manhattan deployment
scenario, shadowing standard deviations should be changed to shadowing standard deviations of
those scenarios. For the BS-MRS and RS-MRS links, the shadowing standard deviation is 7 dB
according to the WINNER C4
model Error! Reference source not found.. For the MRS-MS link
with Indoor Small Office scenario, the shadowing standard deviation is 4dB according to Section
3.2.4. In Table 57, the fixed infrastructure is assumed to be the ART RS scenario.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
ART RS
BRT RS
BS-RS
BS-MS
RS-RS
RS-MS
3.4 dB
8 dB
3.4 dB
8 dB
NLOS: 4 dB
6 dB and 2 dB mean
value positive shift
8 dB
LOS: 3 dB
Urban Microcell
propagation:
Manhattan
deployment
scenario
Urban Microcell
propagation:
NLOS: 4 dB
LOS: 3 dB
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation
(Optional): 7 dB
Urban Microcell
propagation:
NLOS: 4 dB
NLOS: 4 dB
NLOS: 4 dB
NLOS: 4 dB
LOS: 3 dB
LOS: 3 dB
LOS: 3 dB
LOS: 3 dB
(optional)
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation
(Optional): 7 dB
Cell Edge and
Outside
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation
(Optional): 7 dB
BS-RS
BS-MS
RS-RS
RS-MS
3.4 dB
8 dB
3.4 dB
8 dB
3.4 dB
8 dB
3.4 dB
8 dB
RS-MRS
MRS-MS
7 dB
NLOS (Room to
Corridor) 4 dB
(optional)
ASR
(optional)
BS-RS
Mobile Vehicle
Usage Scenario
ART RS
(optional)
3.4 dB
BS-MRS
BS-MS
7 dB
8 dB
RS-MS
ART RS
8 dB
Table 57: Shadowing standard deviation
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
The correlation model for shadow fading is the same as the one described in this document, but the
correlation distance for shadowing is corrected according to Table. The parameters in Table have
been derived based on the baseline model in this document, 802.16j EVM Error! Reference source
not found., SCM, and WINNER models.
In the ART RS scenario for BS-MS and RS-MS links, the shadowing correlation distance is chosen to
be 50 m according to Section Error! Reference source not found.. For the BS-RS and RS-RS links,
the shadowing correlation distance is chosen to be 100 m according to typical values of the LOS
channel correlation distance.
In the BRT RS scenario for the BS-MS and BS-RS links, the shadowing correlation distance is
chosen to be 50 m according to Section 3.2.4. For the RS-RS and RS-MS links, the shadowing
correlation distance is chosen to be 12 m for NLOS and 14 m for LOS conditions according to typical
values of correlation distance given in WINNER Error! Reference source not found. for Urban
Microcell scenarios. For the RS-MS links in Outdoor to Indoor propagation conditions the shadowing
correlation distance is chosen to be 7 m according to WINNER Error! Reference source not
found..
In the Manhattan deployment scenario, for the BS-RS, RS-RS links and BS-MS, RS-MS links with
Urban Microcell propagation conditions, the shadowing correlation distance is chosen to be 12 m for
NLOS and 14 m for LOS conditions according to typical values of correlation distance given in
WINNER Error! Reference source not found.. For the BS-MS, RS-MS links with Outdoor to Indoor
propagation conditions the shadowing correlation distance is chosen to be 7 m according to WINNER
Error! Reference source not found..
In the Cell Edge and Outside scenario and ASR scenario for all of links, shadowing standard
deviations are same with those of ART RS scenario.
In the Mobile Vehicle Usage scenario for BS-RS, BS-MS, and RS-MS links, shadowing correlation
distances are same with those of ART RS scenario. If the fixed infrastructure is chosen to BRT RS or
Manhattan deployment scenario, shadowing standard deviations should be changed to shadowing
correlation distances of those scenarios. For the BS-MRS and RS-MRS links with urban macrocell
scenario, the shadowing correlation distance is 10 m according to the WINNER C4 model Error!
Reference source not found.. For the MRS-MS link with Indoor Small Office scenario, the
shadowing correlation distance is 4 m according to the WINNER A1 NLOS model [13]. In Table 58,
the fixed infrastructure is assumed to be the ART RS scenario.
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
ART RS
BS-RS
BS-MS
RS-RS
RS-MS
100 m
50 m
40 m
50 m
Urban Microcell
propagation
NLOS: 12 m
BRT RS
50 m
50 m
LOS: 14 m
Urban Microcell
propagation:
Manhattan
deployment
scenario (optional)
NLOS: 12 m
LOS: 14 m
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation
(Optional): 7 m
Cell Edge and
Outside
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation
(Optional): 7 m
Urban Microcell
propagation:
NLOS: 12 m
LOS: 14 m
NLOS: 12 m
LOS: 14 m
NLOS: 12 m
LOS: 14 m
NLOS: 12 m
LOS: 14 m
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation
(Optional): 7 m
BS-RS
BS-MS
RS-RS
RS-MS
100 m
50 m
40 m
50 m
100 m
50 m
40 m
50 m
RS-MRS
MRS-MS
(optional)
ASR
(optional)
BS-RS
Mobile Vehicle
Usage Scenario
(optional)
BS-MRS
BS-MS
RS-MS
50 m
50 m
10 m (urban)
100 m
64 m
(suburban)
10 m
64 m (suburban)
Table 58: Correlation distance for shadowing
4m
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
14.3.4.
Summary
BS-RS link
ART RS scenario
BRT RS scenario
Manhattan deployment
scenario
Penetration Loss
0dB
0 dB
0 dB
Modified Baseline Model
(Mandatory)
Urban Microcell pathloss
model (Mandatory) (To
be further modified)
Pathloss Model
IEEE 802.16j EVM
Type D pathloss model
(Mandatory)
Lognormal
Shadowing
Standard Deviation
3.4dB
Correlation
Distance for
Shadowing
100m
Channel Mix
Single static channel
Spatial Channel
Model
Modified Urban and
Suburban Macrocell
(Optional)
WINNER B1 Urban
Microcell pathloss model
(Optional) (To be further
modified)
6 dB and 2 dB mean
value positive shift
NLOS: 4dB
LOS: 3dB
NLOS: 12m
50m
LOS: 14m
Single static channel
Single static channel
Baseline Model
(Mandatory)
WINNER B5a
Modified Urban Microcell
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
RS-RS link
Penetration Loss
Pathloss Model
0dB
IEEE 802.16j EVM
Type D pathloss model
(Mandatory)
0 dB
0 dB
Walfish-Ikegami LOS
and NLOS pathloss
models (Mandatory) (To
be further modified)
Urban Microcell pathloss
model (Mandatory) (To
be further modified)
Urban Microcell
(Optional) (To be further
modified)
WINNER B1 Urban
Microcell pathloss model
(Optional) (To be further
modified)
NLOS: 4dB
NLOS: 4dB
LOS: 3dB
LOS: 3dB
NLOS: 12m
NLOS: 12m
LOS: 14m
LOS: 14m
Lognormal
Shadowing
Standard Deviation
3.4dB
De-correlation
Distance for
Shadowing
40m
Channel Mix
Single static channel
Single static channel
Single static channel
Spatial Channel
Model
WINNER B5a
Modified Urban Microcell
Modified Urban Microcell
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
RS-MS link
Penetration Loss
Urban Microcell
propagation:
Urban Microcell
propagation:
LOS: 0 dB
LOS: 0 dB
NLOS: 10 dB
NLOS: 10 dB
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 0 dB
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 0 dB
10dB
Urban Microcell pathloss
model (Mandatory)
Baseline Model
(Mandatory)
Pathloss Model
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
COST Walfish-Ikegami
LOS and NLOS pathloss
models (Mandatory)
Urban Microcell
(Optional)
Outdoor to Indoor
(Optional)
Lognormal
Shadowing
Standard Deviation
50% BSs, RSs
correlation
ITU Pedestrian B and
Vehicular A channel
models
Channel Mix
Outdoor to Indoor
pathloss model
(Optional)
Urban Microcell
propagation:
Urban Microcell
propagation:
NLOS: 4dB
NLOS: 4dB
LOS: 3dB
LOS: 3dB
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 7 dB
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 7 dB
Urban Microcell
propagation:
Urban Microcell
propagation:
NLOS: 12m
NLOS: 12m
LOS: 14m
LOS: 14m
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 7 m
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 7 m
Urban Microcell
propagation:
Urban Microcell
propagation:
3kmph – 60%
3kmph – 60%
60kmph – 30%
60kmph – 30%
120kmph – 10%
120kmph – 10%
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation:
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation:
TBD
TBD
8dB
50m
Correlation
Distance for
Shadowing
WINNER B1 Urban
Microcell pathloss model
(Optional)
ITU PB 3kmph - 60%
ITU VA 30kmph - 30%
ITU VA 120kmph –
10%
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Spatial Channel
Model
802.16m EMD Urban
and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Urban Microcell
(Mandatory)
Urban Microcell
(Mandatory)
Outdoor to Indoor
(Optional)
Outdoor to Indoor
(Optional)
BS-MS link
Urban Microcell
propagation:
LOS: 0 dB
Penetration Loss
10dB
10dB
NLOS: 10 dB
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 0 dB
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Pathloss Model
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Urban Microcell pathloss
model (Mandatory)
WINNER B1 Urban
Microcell pathloss model
(Optional)
Outdoor to Indoor
pathloss model
(Optional)
Urban Microcell
propagation:
Lognormal
Shadowing
Standard Deviation
NLOS: 4dB
8dB
8dB
LOS: 3dB
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 7 dB
Urban Microcell
propagation:
Correlation
Distance for
Shadowing
50m
50m
NLOS: 12m
50% BSs correlation
50% BSs correlation
LOS: 14m
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 7 m
Channel Mix
802.16m ITU
Pedestrian B and
Vehicular A channel
models
802.16m ITU Pedestrian
B and Vehicular A
channel models
Urban Microcell
propagation:
ITU PB 3kmph - 60%
60kmph – 30%
ITU PB 3kmph - 60%
ITU VA 30kmph - 30%
120kmph – 10%
ITU VA 30kmph - 30%
ITU VA 120kmph – 10%
Outdoor to Indoor
3kmph – 60%
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
propagation:
ITU VA 120kmph –
10%
Spatial Channel
Model
Error Vector
Magnitude (EVM)
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
TBD
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Urban Microcell
(Mandatory)
Outdoor to Indoor
(Optional)
Ideal
Ideal
Ideal
BS-RS link
Cell Edge and
Outside scenario
ASR scenario
Mobile Vehicle Usage
scenario
Penetration Loss
0dB
0 dB
0 dB
BS-MRS link :
Pathloss Model
IEEE 802.16j EVM
Type D pathloss model
(Mandatory)
WINNER C4 [82] with
urban macrocell
(Mandatory)
802.16j EVM Type H
(Mandatory)
WINNER D1 and D2a,
rural macrocell
(Optional)
802.16j EVM Type J
(Optional)
Lognormal
Shadowing
Standard Deviation
3.4dB
3.4dB
Correlation
Distance for
Shadowing
100m
100m
BS-MRS : 7 dB
10 m (urban)
64 m (rural)
MRS (urban) :
3kmph – 10%
60kmph – 60%
120kmph – 30%
Channel Mix
Single static channel
Single static channel
MRS (rural) :
60kmph – 10%
120kmph – 60%
350kmph – 30%
BS-MRS link :
Spatial Channel
Model
WINNER B5a
WINNER B5a
WINNER C4 with urban
macrocell (Mandatory)
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
WINNER D1 and D2a,
rural macrocell
(Optional)
RS-RS link
Penetration Loss
Pathloss Model
0dB
IEEE 802.16j EVM
Type D pathloss model
(Mandatory)
0 dB
802.16j EVM Type H
pathloss model
(Mandatory)
0 dB
RS-MRS link :
WINNER C4 [82] with
urban macrocell
(Mandatory)
WINNER D1 and D2a,
rural macrocell
(Optional)
802.16j EVM Type J
(Optional)
Lognormal
Shadowing
Standard Deviation
3.4dB
3.4dB
De-correlation
Distance for
Shadowing
40m
40m
RS-MRS : 7 dB
10 m (urban)
64 m (rural)
MRS (urban) :
3kmph – 10%
60kmph – 60%
120kmph – 30%
Channel Mix
Single static channel
Single static channel
MRS (rural) :
60kmph – 10%
120kmph – 60%
350kmph – 30%
RS-MRS link :
Spatial Channel
Model
WINNER C4 with urban
macrocell (Mandatory)
WINNER B5a
WINNER B5a
10dB
10dB
WINNER D1 and D2a,
rural macrocell
(Optional)
RS-MS link
RS-MRS : 10dB
Penetration Loss
MRS-MS : 0 dB
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
MSs which are not in the
ASR :
Baseline Model
(Mandatory)
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
MSs in the ASR
Urban Microcell
propagation :
Baseline Model
(Mandatory)
Pathloss Model
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
MRS-MS link:
Urban Microcell COSTWalfish-Ikegami
pathloss model
(Mandatory)
Indoor small office
(Mandatory)
WINNER D2b (Optional)
Urban Microcell test
scenario pathloss model
(Optional)
MSs in the ASR
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation : Outdoor to
Indoor test scenario
pathloss model
(Optional)
Lognormal
Shadowing
Standard Deviation
Correlation
Distance for
Shadowing
8dB
8dB
50m
50m
50% BSs, RSs
correlation
50% BSs, RSs
correlation
ITU Pedestrian B and
Vehicular A channel
models
Channel Mix
ITU PB 3kmph - 60%
ITU VA 30kmph - 30%
ITU VA 120kmph –
10%
MRS-MS : NLOS (Room
to Corridor) 4 dB
MRS-MS :
4m
ITU Pedestrian B and
Vehicular A channel
models
ITU PB 3kmph - 60%
ITU VA 30kmph - 30%
ITU VA 120kmph – 10%
Single static channel
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
MSs which are not in the
ASR :
Baseline test scenario
model (Mandatory)
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Spatial Channel
Model
802.16m EMD Urban
and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Urban Macrocell test
scenario model
(Optional)
MSs in the ASR :
Urban Microcell
propagation : Bad Urban
Microcell model
(Mandatory)
MRS-MS link :
Indoor small office
(Mandatory)
WINNER D2b (Optional)
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation : Outdoor to
Indoor test scenario
model (Optional)
BS-MS link
Urban Microcell
propagation:
LOS: 0 dB
Penetration Loss
10dB
10dB
NLOS: 10 dB
Outdoor to Indoor
propagation: 0 dB
MSs which are not in the
ASR :
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Pathloss Model
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
MSs in the ASR :
Bad Urban Macrocell
model (Mandatory)
Lognormal
Shadowing
Standard Deviation
Correlation
Distance for
Shadowing
Urban Microcell pathloss
model (Mandatory)
WINNER B1 Urban
Microcell pathloss model
(Optional)
Outdoor to Indoor
pathloss model
(Optional)
8dB
8dB
8dB
50m
50m
50m
50% BSs correlation
50% BSs correlation
50% BSs correlation
IEEE C802.16m-09/0217
802.16m ITU
Pedestrian B and
Vehicular A channel
models
Channel Mix
802.16m ITU Pedestrian
B and Vehicular A
channel models
802.16m ITU Pedestrian
B and Vehicular A
channel models
ITU PB 3kmph - 60%
ITU PB 3kmph - 60%
ITU PB 3kmph - 60%
ITU VA 30kmph - 30%
ITU VA 30kmph - 30%
ITU VA 120kmph –
10%
Spatial Channel
Model
Error Vector
Magnitude (EVM)
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Ideal
ITU VA 120kmph – 10%
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Ideal
ITU VA 30kmph - 30%
ITU VA 120kmph – 10%
Baseline model
(Mandatory)
Urban and Suburban
Macrocell (Optional)
Ideal
Table 62: Summary of pathloss and channel models
------------------------------------------------------------End of the text----------------------------------------------------------
References
[1] R. Srinivasan, J. Zhuang, L. Jalloul, R. Novak, J. Park, “Project 802.16m Evaluation Methodology
Document (EMD),” IEEE C80216m-08-004/r3, Oct. 2, 2008.
[2] D.H. Lee, S.C. Kim, D.C. Park, S.S. Hwang, and Y.-I. Kim "Performance Evaluation of Multi-hop Relay
System with Deployment Scenarios," in proc. MIL. Commun. Conf. , San Diego, USA, Nov. 2008.
[3] IEEE 802.16j-06/013r3, “Multi-hop Relay System Evaluation Methodology [Channel Model and
Performance Metric],” IEEE 802.16's Relay Task Group, Feb. 2007.
[4] IEEE 802.16j-06/015, “Harmonized Contribution on 802.16j (Mobile Multihop Relay) Usage Models,”
IEEE 802.16's Relay Task Group, Sep. 2006.