Waste Minimisation
Supplementary Planning Document
Draft For Informal
Consultation
Sept – Dec 2005
Prepared in partnership with:
Draft
Gloucestershire County Council
Environment Agency
Minerals & Waste Planning Policy:
Nick Croft
nicholas.croft@gloucestershire.gov.uk
Tel: 01452 425682
Lower Severn Area Office
Riversmeet House
Newtown Industrial Estate
Northway Lane
Tewkesbury GL20 8JG
Waste Management Unit:
Tel: 01452 426601
Tel: 08708 506506
Fax: 01684 293599
Waste Contractor (Cory Environmental) Helpline:
Tel: 01242 680010
Cheltenham Borough Council
Cotswold District Council
Forward Planning:
Holly Jones
holly.jones@cheltenham.gov.uk
Forward Planning:
Chris Vickery
chris.vickery@cotswold.gov.uk
Planning Reception:
Tel: 01242 264328
Development Control:
Tel: 01285 623001 planning@cotswold.gov.uk
Commercial Waste Collection:
Tel: 01242 264385
Commercial Waste Collection:
Tel: 01285 868057
Waste enquiries & Recycling:
Tel: 01242 264244 or 0800 163134.
cleansing@cheltenham.gov.uk
Waste management:
Tel: 01285 623613
Environmental Health:
Tel: 01242 264204
envhealth@cheltenham.gov.uk
Environmental Health:
Cirencester office Tel: 01285 623000
Moreton-in-Marsh Office Tel: 01608 650881
health@cotswold.gov.uk
Gloucester City Council
Forest of Dean District Council
Forward Planning:
Meyrick Brentnal
Forward Planning:
Nigel Gibbons
meyrickb@glos-city.gov.uk
Development Control:
Tel: 01452 396013
Fax: 01452 396779
Development.Control@gloucester.gov.uk
nigel.gibbons@fdean.gov.uk
Development Control:
Tel: 01594 812340
Waste Helpline:
Tel: 01594 812444
Domestic Waste Collection:
Tel: 01452 396396
Environmental Health:
Tel: 01594 812 442
Fax: 01594 812 500.
environmental.health@fdean.gov.uk
Commercial/Trade Waste Collection:
Tel: 01452 396255
Environmental Health:
Tel: 01452 396396
Fax: 01452 396340
enviro@gloucester.gov.uk
Stroud District Council
Tewkesbury Borough Council
Forward Planning:
Mark Newcombe
mark.newcombe@stroud.gov.uk
Forward Planning:
Toby Clempson
clempsont@tewkesburybc.gov.uk
Development Control:
Tel: 01453 754518
Fax: 01453 754511
Planning Reception:
Tel: 01684 272151
Building Control:
buildingcontrol@tewkesbury.gov.uk
Household Waste Collection:
Tel: 01453 754412
Trade Waste Collection:
Tel: 01285 760726
Commercial Waste Collection:
Tel: 01684 272192 or 272228
commercialservices@tewkesbury.gov.uk
Recycling:
Tel: 01453 754424
recycling@stroud.gov.uk
Recycling:
Tel: 01684 272185
recycling@tewkesbury.gov.uk
Environmental Health:
Tel: 01453 754478
Environmental Health:
Tel: 01684 272191
ehenquiries@tewkesbury.gov.uk
2
Contents
Introduction
Why minimise waste?
Who is this SPD for?
What types of development does it apply to?
2
2
2
2
Planning Context
Sustainable waste Management
National
Regional
Local Level
Supplementary Planning Document Status
Community Strategy Linkage
Municipal Waste Management Strategy
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
Preparing the SPD
Sustainability Appraisal & Strategic Environmental Appraisal
8
8
As an applicant/developer, what am I required to do?
What if the details of the scheme are undecided?
Use of planning conditions and legal agreements
9
10
10
During Design of the Proposal
12
During Demolition and Construction
On-site crushing and screening
15
17
During Habitation of Buildings
Household Waste Collection
Commercial Waste Collection
18
18
19
Checklist for Preparing a Waste Minimisation Statement (WMS)
20
Appendices
A
Regional Waste Strategy Policy on Waste Minimisation
21
B
Gloucestershire Waste Local Plan Policy 36 – Waste Minimisation
22
C
Expert Group Composition
24
D
Timetable for preparing the SPD
25
E
DTI SWMP Nine Step Process
26
F
Provision for Waste Recycling/Composting in Developments
27
G
Form for Preparing a SWMP
29
H
List of Useful Documents
30
I
Glossary and Abbreviations
31
J
PPS10 Planning for Sustainable Waste Management [excerpt]
33
K
Non-Technical Summary of the Interim SEA/SA Results
34
L
Minutes of Waste Minimisation Expert Group Discussion
35
Draft
Introduction
1.1
The aim of this supplementary planning document (SPD) is to minimise the
production of waste during demolition, construction 1 and occupation of buildings. This
is to be achieved through developers preparing and submitting a Waste Minimisation
Statement (WMS) as part of their planning application, and then committing to
implement it through their permission.
1.2
SPDs are planning documents that sit alongside development plans (see section 2).
They are an important consideration to take into account when planning applications
are decided. This SPD provides additional detail about how Policy 36 ‘Waste
Minimisation’2 of the Gloucestershire Waste Local Plan (WLP)3 is to be implemented.
The WLP is a statutory land-use document that provides the detailed policy
framework for determining planning applications for waste management development
in Gloucestershire. It’s aim is to progress the County towards sustainable waste
management practices over the next 10 years.
To do an SPD, or not to do?
1.3
To date the implementation of WLP policy 36 has been inconsistent. The ‘do nothing’
option in terms of preparing this SPD will serve to perpetuate the lack of action on this
important issue. Therefore, although the requirement to submit a WMS is already in
place, this SPD seeks to make that requirement more explicit and easier for all
concerned to implement.
Why Minimise Waste?
1.4
Waste minimisation means not producing waste in the first place. This requires the
reduction of waste at source. To do this the waste implications of a proposal need to
be considered at the earliest possible stage. In the context of this SPD, waste
minimisation also means making the best use of that waste which is produced. Waste
should be managed in accordance with the ‘waste hierarchy’ (Prevent, Reduce,
Reuse, Recycle, Dispose – see diagram overleaf) unless it can be demonstrated that
an alternative approach is more environmentally sound.
1.5
Minimising or re-using waste generated through site development (including
demolition waste) will reduce the amount of waste that has to be managed and
ultimately disposed of, which in turn will contribute to reducing the production of
greenhouse gas emissions. In addition it will reduce the amount of primary
construction materials that have to be processed, purchased, and transported. This
1
2
3
For the purposes of this SPD ‘construction’ includes the fitting-out of buildings.
Policy 36 is set out in Appendix B of this SPD.
Gloucestershire Waste Local Plan adopted October 2004.
2
Draft
can result in considerable financial savings 4 for developers by avoiding landfill
charges and precluding the need to pay aggregates tax for primary materials. This is
over and above the benefits to the environment. However, to be most effective, waste
generation needs to be considered at the outset.
Reduce the amount produced;
Re-use as much as possible;
Recycle as much as possible;
Recover value from what is left;
Dispose as a last resort.
Who is this SPD for?
1.6
When preparing, assessing and determining planning applications, this SPD is
intended to assist:

Applicants and Developers (including planning/technical consultants);

Local Planning Authorities;

Waste Collection Authorities;

Waste Planning Authority;

Members of the public;

Other interested parties.
What types of development does this SPD apply to?
1.7
The principles of waste minimisation apply to all development. This includes newbuild, refurbishment (including demolition), conversion, extensions or change of use
(see box overleaf).
4
A Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) study suggests that the costs of producing and disposing of
waste amounts to around 4% of turnover.
3
Draft
Waste Minimisation Principles
1.8

To design proposals sustainably;

To reduce the amount of waste generated from development;

To conserve natural resources through re-using waste arising as a result
of construction;

To re-use waste materials on-site to reduce transportation.
It is generally true that the larger the development the greater its implications for
using resources and generating waste. This however does not mean that smaller
projects should not apply and abide by the principles of waste minimisation. The
implementation of these principles are best undertaken through the planning
application process. The majority of applications to which this SPD relates will be
determined by District Councils. During 2004 there were over 11,500 planning
applications determined in the six Gloucestershire Districts. To require submission of
a WMS with each of these would require considerable resources. To make the
implementation of this SPD more effective a working threshold for submitting a WMS
is intended to be introduced to target ‘major’ development.
1.9
To provide a threshold of planning application size for requiring submission of a WMS
a number of cut-off levels can be considered. For example, the Department of Trade
and Industry (DTI) guide looks at projects in excess of £200,000. The Demolition
Protocol looks at projects over 500m² using more than 1000 tonnes of material in the
new build. Neither of these preclude other development likely to produce a significant
amount of waste. Wiltshire and Swindon Waste Planning Authorities have prepared a
Waste Minimisation SPG using the thresholds below.
Case Study 1 - Wiltshire & Swindon Waste Minimisation Thresholds

10+ dwelling units;

500m²+ of retail floor space;

300m²+ of business/industrial floor space;

transport, leisure, recreation, tourist or community facilities;

car parks, including park and ride facilities;

other developments likely to generate significant amounts of waste.
4
1.10
Draft
Another option is to use the ODPM's Development Control (DC) Statistics for England
definition of 'major' development. For residential developments, a major site is one
where 10 or more dwellings are to be constructed or, if this is not known, where the
site area is 0.5 hectares or more. For other types of development a major site is one
where the floorspace to be built is 1,000 square metres or more, or the site area is 1
hectare or more. As an example of the numbers of applications captured by utilising
this threshold, Cheltenham BC determined 66 ‘major’ applications in 2004. The
benefit of using this threshold is that monitoring data would be relatively easy to
collect and it would be simpler for the individual planning authorities to implement.
1.11
Other options include: developments that require an EIA are potentially of a scale that
could generate significant waste. Whilst it is likely that the majority of these would be
captured by thresholds such as those used by the ODPM DC definition. It could be of
benefit to incorporate the requirement to submit a WMS as part of an environmental
statement under the EIA regulations. A further option would be to use a ‘three tier’
approach whereby ‘major’ development and any other application that falls to be
determined by planning committee are included.
1.12
Applicants of developments that fall below the chosen threshold would be advised of
the financial and environmental benefits of following the principles of waste
minimisation. This would take the form of an informative leaflet (to be prepared) in
which brief case study examples would highlight potential cost savings and practical
solutions. Persuasion for undertakers of these smaller projects (mostly householder
extensions) could be the most appropriate way forward. In addition the EA provide
guidance on pollution prevention5 to assist developers in undertaking their projects.
Question 1
What should the threshold size of planning application be for requiring an
applicant to submit a waste minimisation statement?
Environment Agency ‘Pollution Prevention Guidance Notes’ can be found at http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/business/444251/444731/ppg/
5
5
2
Draft
Planning Context
Sustainable Waste Management
2.1
Effectively managing waste is a key element of sustainable development, which is the
core principle underpinning land-use planning. A key objective is to drive waste
management up the waste hierarchy. Where waste is produced it should be seen as
a potential resource to be put to good use in place of primary materials. The
requirement to minimise the production of waste is supported in land-use planning at
national, regional, and local policy level. Waste reduction also contributes to reducing
greenhouse gas emissions during the production, use and disposal of these
materials.
National
2.2
National planning guidance on waste minimisation is primarily contained in Planning
Policy Statement 10 ‘Planning for Sustainable Waste Management’ (PPS10) (see
Appendix J of this SPD) and the amended National Waste Strategy 'Waste Strategy
2000' (DETR).
Regional
2.3
The Regional Waste Strategy (RWS) Policy P10.8 on Waste Minimisation requires
new development to be designed to minimise the production of waste (see Appendix
A). In determining planning applications the RWS6 states that developers should be
encouraged to provide information on how they will minimise the production of waste
and maximise the re-use and recycling of that which is produced.
Local Level
2.4
WLP Policy 36 requires waste to be minimised when development is undertaken and
when buildings are occupied (see Appendix B). The WLP comprises part of the
development plan for Gloucestershire. Under the ‘old style’ planning system, the
development plan comprises adopted district local plans, the minerals and waste
local plans and the structure plan. However, the development plan under the ‘new’
planning system consists of local development frameworks (including minerals and
waste development frameworks) and the Regional Spatial Strategy. Planning
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. This SPD comprises a material
consideration in the determination of planning applications that sets out how Policy 36
is to operate.
6
This is to be translated into the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS), due to be adopted in 2007.
6
Supplementary Planning Document Status
2.5
Draft
Whilst the SPD does not have full development plan status it still comprises an
important part (a material consideration) of considering the acceptability of a
development proposal. This SPD will largely be implemented through district council
development control functions. It has therefore been prepared in consultation and
partnership with Gloucestershire’s six Districts.
Community Strategy Linkage
2.6
The ‘Community Strategy for Gloucestershire’ states that to ensure a better
environment we will minimise the amount of waste produced and increase recycling
(P4, page 21). The six District’s community strategies also embrace the notion of
minimising waste.
District
Cheltenham
To explicitly seek to reduce waste and increase recycling
Cotswolds
Aim to minimise waste production and finite natural resource usage
Gloucester
To ensure that new developments are sustainable
Forest of Dean
Aim to develop a sustainable environment
Stroud
Aim to develop a sustainable environment
Tewkesbury
2.7
Community Strategy Aims
To seek additional recycling schemes
This SPD represents a significant step in actioning these aims through the land-use
planning system.
Municipal Waste Management Strategy
2.8
A revised joint municipal waste management strategy (MWMS) is being developed by
the Waste Disposal Authority and consultation on this is due to begin in Autumn
2005. The MWMS sets out future waste management in Gloucestershire reflecting
current and future legislation, for example the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme
(LATS). This document may have implications for developers in terms of planning for
future waste management practices during the occupation phase of the development.
2.9
The different practices adopted by Waste Collection Authorities in terms of the
methods, receptacles and materials segregation is an issue that has been identified
as one that may require tailored solutions for each District (see Section 7 and
Appendix F).
7
Draft
3
Preparing the SPD
3.1
The community will be actively involved in preparing this waste minimisation SPD in a
variety of ways. Public participation will be tailored to the particular stage of
preparation. Initially, informal District and County Council Officer input was sought.
This was followed by an ‘expert group’ of 21 invitees (listed in Appendix C) to discuss
the SPD’s content. The culmination of the group’s deliberations is this draft
document, which is currently being subject to an extended period of informal
stakeholder consultation (from Sept – Dec 2005). Formal consultation on the SPD will
be undertaken in March 2006 for a statutory period of 6 weeks. Approval by elected
members will be sought at two key stages (Spring and Summer 2006). It is intended
that the final SPD will be adopted in August 2006.
3.2
To make all parties aware of the timetable for preparing this SPD, it is proposed to
follow the framework set out in Appendix D.
Question 2
Is this document easy for developers, planners and members of the public to
understand and use?
Sustainability Appraisal (SA) & Strategic Environmental Appraisal (SEA)
3.3
This SPD is required to undergo a Sustainability Appraisal (SA), which incorporates
the requirements of the SEA Directive (2001/42/EC). This process provides a
framework for assessing the SPD’s sustainability credentials. A copy of the Interim
SA Report is also available for people to comment on, with the non-technical
summary reproduced in Appendix K.
8
Draft
4
As an applicant/developer, what am I required to do?
4.1
Applicants/developers for ‘major’ development 7 are required to prepare and submit a
waste minimisation statement (WMS) to accompany their planning application. The
WMS needs to set out how waste arising during the demolition, construction and
occupation of the development is to be minimised/managed. The WMS must include:

the types and quantities of waste likely to be generated (including hazardous
wastes);

the range of waste management options to be utilised (paying particular
attention to the waste hierarchy and demonstrating how off-site disposal will be
minimised);

a commitment to re-use and recover materials where possible on-site;

a statement setting out how the proposal has been designed to incorporate
recycling/composting facilities (where appropriate); and

a method for monitoring/recording the amount of waste actually produced &
recycled, including corrective actions if non-compliance is detected.
4.2
A checklist is provided on page 18 to assist in preparing a WMS. In addition, further
guidance is set out in the DTI voluntary code of practice 8, which encourages the
preparation of a Site Waste Management Plan [SWMP] (see Appendix E). This
approach is supported by the Environment Agency (EA) 9. To avoid confusion, for the
purposes of this SPD the term Waste Minimisation Statement (WMS) is taken to
include other derivations such as SWMPs.
To be most effective, waste minimisation issues need to be
considered during the formative stages of proposal design.
4.3
It is not acceptable for applicants or planning authorities to defer submission of the
WMS to a later date through the use of a planning condition. This information must be
provided in support of an application from the outset in order for decision makers to
take waste issues into account when determining the acceptability of the proposal.
Under the ODPM ‘Best Practice Guidance on the validity of planning applications’
(March 2005) consideration is being given to following a practice whereby planning
applications for ‘major’ development10 that are not accompanied by a WMS will not be
7
As defined in Section 1 of this SDP.
DTI voluntary code of practice for construction contractors and clients (8th July 2004).
9 EA Sustainable Construction: Position Statement (http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/aboutus/512398/289428/654938/?version=1&lang=_e)
10
As defined in Section 1 of the SPD.
8
9
Draft
registered as valid. This though will require the six district councils to adopt such an
approach in order to gain consistency across the County.
Question 3
Consideration is being given to following a practice whereby planning
applications for ‘major’ development11 that are not accompanied by a WMS will
not be registered as valid. What are your views on this approach?
What if the details of the development are undecided?
4.4
Where the precise details of a development are undecided, for example when an
outline planning application is submitted, a broad WMS should be submitted setting
down the principles for managing waste on site. This should contain a clear
commitment to action and achieving high standards, which will provide the framework
for a more detailed WMS setting out tonnages, destinations and timescales to be
submitted as part of the reserved matters applications. Both elements of the WMS in
such cases need to conform with the requirements set out in this SPD.
Use of planning conditions and legal agreements
4.5
The enforceability of planning conditions in respect of requiring submission of a WMS
is potentially a concern. However, if this SPD is followed then the WMS will be
submitted as part of the application package. Therefore planning conditions can be
used to require adherence with the approved WMS. Three standard conditions are
set out below, which provide the basis for LPAs to work with in formulating their
decision notices.
4.6
In accordance with Waste Local Plan paragraphs 5.130 & 5.131, where particular
requirements are made (for example the provision of regular waste audit statements
during construction works), it may be that the use of legal agreements provides a
better approach. This will be determined on a case by case basis as appropriate.
Question 4
Do you consider that the standard conditions below are fit for purpose? What
other standard conditions should be included in this SPD?
Standard decision notice condition requiring the applicant/developer to adhere
to WMS:
The development hereby permitted shall be undertaken in accordance with the
approved waste minimisation statement (Reference………….). The areas allocated
on Plan/Drawing No. …….. for recyclate and/or compostable material storage shall
11
As defined in Section 1 of the SPD.
10
Draft
only be used for that purpose. There shall be no deviation from this WMS unless with
prior written consent from the local planning authority.
Reason: to ensure that dedicate storage areas for waste materials are maintained as
such and that the development conforms with waste minimisation requirements.
Standard condition for outline applications to set out what needs to be
submitted at reserved matters stage:
No development shall commence until a Detailed Waste Management Strategy
(DWMS) for the treatment, recycling and re-use of waste arising from the construction
of the development has been submitted to and approved in writing by the LPA. This
DWMS shall be in accordance with the approved Waste Management Strategy
(WMS) (ref:....). The DWMS must set out details of volumes and types of waste
anticipated to be generated during the construction stage (including anticipated
wastage of primary construction materials). The DWMS must also include details of
the amount of waste expected to be generated by engineering/landscaping of the
site. All such materials must be re-used on-site unless it can be demonstrated to the
satisfaction of the LPA that this is not the most sustainable option. In such
circumstances details must be provided of where it is to be taken, how much and the
timescales for final disposal or recycling. Waste shall thereafter be dealt with in
accordance with the WMS and DWMS unless the LPA gives written consent to any
variation.
Reason: to ensure that the development conforms with waste minimisation
requirements.
Standard condition to ensure submission of a completion report for monitoring
purposes:
Prior to occupation of the approved development a statement shall be submitted to
the LPA demonstrating how the elements contained in the approved WMS (ref……)
have been implemented. The development hereby permitted shall not be occupied
until LPA approval for that statement has been given.
Reason: to ensure compliance with the WMS and to facilitate monitoring of waste
arisings/management from this development.
11
Draft
5
During Design of the Proposal
5.1
Good design and layout in new development can help to secure opportunities for
sustainable waste management; for example, storage areas for bins, facilitating
kerbside collections, and locations for secure community recycling. This is supported
by the Government’s latest Planning Policy Statement on “Planning for Sustainable
Waste Management” [PPS10] (see Appendix J).
5.2
The design section of this SPD is intended to provide informative guidance rather
than a prescriptive ‘must do’ list. The solution to designing-in recycling facilities (and
storage for them) will depend on the type/nature of scheme being developed. This
SPD consequently does not seek to impose solutions upon developers, rather it
encourages innovation through considering and adapting the ideas from the case
studies set out below. The overarching aim is to give people the means and
opportunities for recycling at their home, work and during recreation. Further advice
can be obtained from the Envirowise Helpline (0800 585794).
INSERT case studies from Envirowise when available
12
5.3
Draft
Designing-in good waste minimisation practice from the outset can save time and
expense later in the process. The design stage encompasses all of the formative
work undertaken prior to a planning application being submitted, including how, and
with what, the development is intended to be built. For example, consideration should
be given to pre-fabricating and pre-treating construction materials at the point of
production. This reduces the need to have excess materials on-site. Other options
include designing buildings to last multiple generations (build quality), or for ease of
disassembly (for example using bolts instead of welds).
5.4
Consideration also needs to be given to reducing hazardous waste generation. By
substituting hazardous materials for non-hazardous ones at the design stage, this will
make the management of waste easier during both the construction phase and then
any future demolition operations. Where materials are used that could cause
environmental harm, measures must be put in place to minimise the pollution
potential. District Environmental Health Officers should be able to advise on best
practice, and the Environment Agency has prepared pollution prevention guidance for
developers (contact details are provided at the front of this SPD).
5.5
Planning authorities should ensure that new development makes sufficient provision
for waste management. Applicants should consider the following issues:

space for recycling boxes (homes/work places);

home composting provision;

communal/purpose built areas12;

deposit points and ‘bring’ facilities.
Further examples are given in Appendix F.
5.6
Where internal storage areas for recycling boxes are not practical (for example
dwellings with small kitchens) the use of multiple ‘under-sink bins’ for segregating
waste could provide the solution (see Case Study 2 below). As a minimum,
residential developments should incorporate external provision for storing recycling
boxes / wheeled bins.
12
These may require a license from the Environment Agency (contact details are provided at the front of this SPD).
13
Case Study 2 - Segregated Under-Sink Bins
Draft
Green Lifestyles at BedZED Eco Village
Each BedZED home incorporates a colour coded, segregated under-sink bin. The
colours relate to the type of waste – green for compostable vegetable waste, two
grey sections - for glass, plastics, paper and tins and brown for non-recyclables.
This makes separating and transporting the materials to the corresponding
outside bins easy.
5.7
It is recognised that the retention of recyclate storage areas, identified to be set-aside
as a requirement of planning permission, is not necessarily easy to enforce. However,
this should not be used as a reason for not allocating recycling areas. If a space is
identified, and put to an alternative use which leads to problems (for example with
materials proximate to the public highway), then enforcement action can be taken and
the space called upon. If such an area had not been identified at the planning stage
then retrospectively finding sufficient space could be difficult.
5.8
A statement should be included in the WMS setting out precisely how the proposal
has been designed to incorporate these storage areas.
Question 5
Are the requirements set out in Appendix F helpful, overly restrictive or not
explicit enough?
14
Draft
6
During Demolition and Construction
6.1
Construction and demolition (C&D) waste accounts for 19% of all UK waste, of which
13 million tonnes comprise materials delivered to sites but never used 13. Not overordering materials is therefore the staring point in minimising waste.
6.2
The recycling of C&D waste has been largely market driven for a number of years.
The imposition of the Landfill Tax and Aggregates Tax have made utilising recycled
aggregates a commercially attractive option. Consequently many construction firms
are likely to be already implementing part of the requirements of this SPD.
Nevertheless, the best use of the material should be encouraged, as some recycled
aggregates may be suitable for high-grade applications. It is also worth bearing in
mind that some recycled aggregates such as recycled planings contain hazardous
materials such as tar and will need to be stored as hazardous waste as per the EA’s
recommendations until it can be recycled into an appropriate end product.
6.3
To assist in understanding and planning for the wastes that are likely to arise a
standard audit form can be used (set out in Appendix G). Key methods for reducing
waste are:

Avoid over-ordering materials (in terms of quantity and specification);

Pre-fabricate off-site to reduce off-cuts and treatment product surplus;

Segregate waste materials to avoid cross contamination and facilitate easier
recovery;

Re-use waste materials on site

Re-use off site, as a preference to landfilling.
The main contractor should take a lead role in managing the waste arising during
construction.
6.3
The EA are seeking the Government to introduce specific targets for recycling
construction waste including a requirement to use a fixed percentage of reclaimed
materials in construction. This would help make construction and demolition waste
more valuable and hence less likely to be purchased or disposed of in a careless
way. It would also help to create a ‘level playing field’ for developers across the
Country. However, individual site characteristics, difficulties with determining
appropriate
quantities
(not
least
the
expertise
required),
rapidly changing
technologies and subsequently enforcing targets, mean that setting percentages for
developers to achieve may not always be applicable or realistic.
13
EA Sustainable Construction: Position Statement (August 2003)
15
Draft
Question 6
Do you consider that setting targets for on-site recycling/re-use of C&D waste
is the most practical way of implementing waste minimisation principles? If so
what should these targets be
6.4
Best practice examples for different developments (below) offer ideas and practical
solutions for minimising waste and saving money. It is intended that these will
stimulate innovation whilst providing challenging yet realistic guidance. This approach
is intended to engender continuous improvement rather than provide a target ceiling
for applicants to meet.
INSERT best practice examples of recycling/minimising C&D waste when
available
Question 7
Are you aware of any best practice examples for minimising waste in different
developments that could be included in this SPD?
16
6.5
Draft
Various documents put forward ideas for good practice and possible methodologies
to follow. Examples include: the Demolition Protocol 14; the CEEQUAL Manual15; and
the BREEAM16 website. However, the SPD does not delegate responsibility to these
documents, it merely identifies them as sources of information that may be of use.
6.6
The sorting of waste at source is deemed to be more appropriate than off site sorting,
provided there is sufficient space in which to do so. Managing wastes, in particular
material segregation can be improved by staff training and awareness raising. For
example, introducing systems and signage to help prevent contamination of one
material (e.g. timber sorted in a skip) by another (e.g. paint discarded in that same
receptacle). This is also important during the fitting-out of buildings when it is likely
that a significant amount of packaging waste will be generated.
6.7
Disposal is the last option. However, if disposal is the only viable option (for example
with contaminated soils), the reasons for this must be clearly demonstrated in the
WMS, and its final destination justified in respect of proximity to the source of arising.
The EA would be able to advise of specific disposal requirements.
Question 8
What specific methods for minimising C&D waste should be included in this
SPD?
On-Site Crushing and Screening
6.8
Mobile plant operation requires a waste management license, though some small
scale recovery may be exempt from licensing (they would still require registering).
The Mobile Plant Licensing regime is currently in the process of being amended
(Environment Agency, July 2005).
6.9
Government guidance (though it is unclear what) cited in the Demolition Protocol
suggests that on-site crushing/screening is not appropriate on sites smaller than
0.1ha (1000m²) for environmental/amenity reasons 17. The Environment Agency will
be able to advise applicants on the appropriateness of such activities (see inside
cover of this SPD for local EA contact details).
14
Demolition Protocol Implementation Document (date unknown) commissioned by London Remade
CEEQUAL Manual, Version 3, 30th June 2004
16
BRE’s environmental assessment method for new and existing buildings – www.breeam.org
17
LAPC + LAPPC Risk Method, Revised April 2004
15
17
Draft
7
During Habitation of Buildings
7.1
Once a building is being occupied waste will be generated. This should be managed
using the same waste minimisation principles as for its design and construction.
Applicants therefore need to address the likely types, quantities and sources of waste
generation during the habitation of new or refurbished dwellings.
7.2
People will recycle more if the infrastructure is in place to make it easy for them to do
so18. Consequently, applicants will be required to provide (where appropriate):

Recycling boxes and appropriate storage areas (for example segregated undersink recycling bins);
7.3

Composting bins and segregated storage areas;

Communal facilities;

Areas at non-residential development for recycling skips etc.
Boxes/bins being provided should be appropriate to the size/nature of the
development proposed and the waste collection regime in operation (see section
below). To assist in making this provision, Section 106 legal agreements may be
sought from developers in accordance with the adopted WLP (paragraph 5.130).
Household Waste Collection
7.4
District Councils undertake the collection of waste from homes. They are referred to
as Waste Collection Authorities (WCA). Providing the means to facilitate this
collection will greatly assist authorities to meet their recycling targets. However, due
to historical contracts there are different collection schemes in operation in each of
the county’s six districts. Although the Gloucestershire Waste Partnership19 is working
towards a more coordinated approach it will take time. It is therefore imperative that
applicants/developers discuss the issue of household waste collection with the
appropriate District Waste Collection Officer (contact phone numbers are provided
on the inside front cover).
7.5
Detailed discussions must be held with the WCA and the Waste Disposal Authority
(WDA – the County Council), prior to submission of the WMS to secure the correct
type of provision for the scheme being proposed. This will help to:
18
19

reflect existing waste management provision;

avoid conflict with waste management systems currently in operation;
Regional Waste Strategy for the South West 2004 – 2020 (page 45)
The Gloucestershire Waste Partnership consists of representatives from the six Districts and the County Council.
18
Draft

determine collection arrangements for the waste;

influence transportation methods, distances and routes to waste disposal
facilities;

take account of the needs of recycling/residual waste collection vehicles in road
layouts.
Commercial Waste Collection
7.6
The size of waste/recyclate collection vehicles is increasing. The practicalities of
waste collection from commercial premises therefore need to be considered as part
of the WMS. This includes both materials for recycling as well as residual waste for
disposal.
19
Draft
8
Checklist for Preparing a Waste Minimisation Statement (WMS)
8.1
The following criteria provide a checklist for both planning officers and applicants to
use to assist in the production of a WMS (also see Appendix E). The WMS’s content
is not limited to these issues, which are intended only as a guide:
The scheme has been designed to minimise waste production
Recycled materials are specified where practicable
Tonnage of each type of demolition waste likely to be produced is given
On-site re-use of waste materials wherever possible
Off-site re-use of waste materials
Tonnage of construction waste (including volume of packaging) likely to arise
Provision made for waste material segregation
Suitable provision for hazardous waste arising on-site
Measures for raising on-site awareness of waste minimisation
Justification provided for any waste going to landfill
WDA / WCA advice obtained on box/bin provision
Space provided for recycling boxes
Segregated garden space provided for home composting bins
Area for communal facilities set aside where appropriate
Recycling boxes / composting bins provided by developer
Communal ‘bring’ scheme facilities provided
Method set out for auditing waste to be managed
Monitoring scheme to include corrective measures if failures occur
Question 9
Are there any other matters that should be included in this checklist?
20
Draft
Appendix A
Regional Waste Strategy Policy on Waste Minimisation
Policy P10.8 – Design Quality
Local and regional authorities and agencies and others should promote sustainable
construction and demolition in accordance with the regional sustainable construction charter
by:
(i)
requiring that new development should be designed and planned so as to
minimise the production of waste - development plans should encourage
development proposals to minimise the use of raw materials and, reuse and
recycle waste generated during construction and demolition;
(ii)
before granting planning permission for major development involving demolition
or the production of waste materials, encouraging developers to provide
information on the proposed method of dealing with waste so as to minimize its
production and maximise reuse and recycling.
21
Draft
Appendix B
Gloucestershire Waste Local Plan Policy 36 – Waste Minimisation
PROPOSALS FOR DEVELOPMENT REQUIRING PLANNING PERMISSION SHALL INCLUDE A
SCHEME
FOR
SUSTAINABLE
MANAGEMENT
OF
THE
WASTE
GENERATED
BY
THE
DEVELOPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DURING SUBSEQUENT OCCUPATION.
THE
SCHEME SHALL INCLUDE MEASURES TO:
I.
MINIMISE, RE-USE AND RECYCLE WASTE; AND
II.
MINIMISE THE USE OF RAW MATERIALS; AND
III.
MINIMISE THE POLLUTION POTENTIAL OF UNAVOIDABLE WASTE; AND
IV.
DISPOSE OF UNAVOIDABLE WASTE IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY ACCEPTABLE
MANNER;
INITIATIVES TO REDUCE WASTE GENERATION WILL BE ENCOURAGED THROUGHOUT THE
COUNTY.
5.128
The waste implications of all development should be considered at the earliest
possible stage. As local planning authorities, the County and the District Councils
have a role to play in ensuring that new development contributes to the objectives of
the Waste Strategy for Gloucestershire (June 1997) 20. This policy is not just
applicable to development by the County Council but to all development, as indicated
in the National Waste Strategy (Waste Strategy 2000). The policy is part of the set of
policies that make up the Development Plan as applied through Section 54A of the
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended). Waste is not restricted by
administrative boundaries and neither should consideration of it as part of any
proposed development.
5.129
Waste generation and disposal implications of new development is a legitimate
planning consideration. Planning Applications should contain a statement outlining
waste generation and arrangements for minimisation, re-use, recycling, processing
and disposal. For development requiring an Environmental Statement, the statement
should include a detailed evaluation of the waste generation impact of the proposals.
5.130
This policy should be used in combination with other policies of the Development
Plan. Waste minimisation does have a practical land use element to it. In relation to
20
Please note that this document has since been replaced by the Municipal Waste Management Strategy 2002,
which in itself is currently in the process of being revised.
22
Draft
household waste, it is proposed that through conditions or a section 106 agreement
all new housing developments where appropriate should be supplied with home
composting bins and booklets on how to use them by the developer.
5.131
In relation to commercial and industrial wastes, developers should provide facilities
within: business parks; industrial estates; retail parks; and science and technology
parks; that treat and manage the majority of the waste produced internal to the site.
This is intended to encourage the use of waste locally, stimulate new businesses,
reduce traffic and is in line with the proximity principle. These facilities should be
secured through condition or a section 106 agreement with the developer wherever
possible, if not included in the original development proposal.
5.132
The Gloucestershire Waste Management Strategy (1997)14 promotes beneficial use
of recyclable materials. Without adequate markets for the substantial volumes of
recycled materials the strategy would be jeopardised. This partly depends on the
private sector creating and marketing new and innovative products and clearly
demonstrating that these recyclable materials can meet the standards and
specifications achieved by established materials. This is particularly important for the
construction industry. It also depends on developing a different attitude to using
recycled materials and almost involves an element of ‘positive discrimination’ in
favour of recycled products.
5.133
Minimising the volumes of waste we produce is the other half of the waste
minimisation equation. It will mean that consumers will have to review issues such as
manufacturing processes and purchasing policies. On the face of it this appears to
have limited specific land use implications but it may create the need to modify or
change the layout and design of existing or new development. In such cases, Local
Planning Authorities should take a positive and sympathetic approach to such needs.
14
Please note that this document has since been replaced by the Municipal Waste Management Strategy 2002,
which in itself is currently in the process of being revised.
23
Draft
Appendix C
Expert Discussion Group
On the 7th September 2005 an invited group of 21 individuals, representing a wide variety of
organisations, convened at Gloucester City Council Offices to discuss the content of this
SPD. A roundtable discussion was interspersed with a couple of short presentations to
introduce topics. A copy of the minutes of that meeting have been posted on the
Gloucestershire County Council website.
The attendees were:
Martin Chandler
Cheltenham Borough Council (Development Control Officer)
Meyrick Brentnal
Gloucester City Council (Planning)
Cat Phelps
Gloucester City Council (Recycling)
Carlos Novoth
Representing Waste Collection Authorities (Stroud District Council)
Martin Everett
Environment Agency
Laura Hackwood
Environment Agency
Verity Small
Smiths Plant Hire
Paul Wormald
Grundons
Simon Ford
All Stone Sand & Gravel
David Maslen
Moreton C Cullimore Ltd
David Glenn
Huntsmans Quarries
Andy Jackson
Westbury Homes Ltd
Carole Bond
Envirowise
Frances Robertson
Friends of the Earth
Peter King
Halcrow
Kevin Phillips
Team Leader, Gloucestershire County Council
Nick Croft
Principal Planning Officer, Gloucestershire County Council
Nigel Overal
Highway Operations Manager, Gloucestershire County Council
Chris Brown
Estate Roads Manager, Gloucestershire County Council
Charlotte Weeks
Planning Officer, Gloucestershire County Council
David Ingleby
Planning Officer, Gloucestershire County Council
24
Draft
Appendix D
Timetable for Preparing the SPD
To make all parties aware of the intended timetable for preparing this SPD, it is proposed to
follow the framework set out below.
Year
2005
Month
J
Key Milestones (from M&WDS)
C
Consultation Stages
J
2006
A
S
D
L
D
S
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
2
A
A
P
E
1
N
O
Stakeholder Events
Document Preparation
O
R
F
3
4
5
6
7
8
C
Commence preparation
D
Rough draft of initial ideas to be sent to District partners for informal comments
L
Letters sent inviting selected key members to form an expert group
E
Convene Expert group to discuss what should be included in the SPD
S
Wider informal Stakeholder consultation (similar to Reg25) including Newsletter No.3
F
Stakeholder Forum to discuss expert group’s suggestions (if enough interest)
O
Formal 6 week consultation on preferred Options
P
County and District Council approval of Preferred option
R
District Council Ratification of final SPD
A
Adopt SPD
1
initial rough draft prepared based on previous operation of WLP Policy 36
2
amend draft following initial informal District officer comments
3
re-write following expert group discussions/suggestions
4
re-write after wider stakeholder involvement to generate preferred option document
5
amend following County and District Council approval of preferred option document
6
re-write as a result of formal 6 week consultation responses – prepare final version
7
amend if necessary following final County and District Council ratification
8
arrange for printing/publishing of final adopted SPD
25
Draft
Appendix E
DTI Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) Nine Step Process
The DTI guide sets out a nine step strategy for preparing a SWMP for projects worth in
excess of £200,000.
Step 1 – Identify who is responsible for producing the SWMP and ensuring that it is followed
– and make sure that they know who they are! Different individuals may be responsible during
the planning stages and the site-work stages. They must know that they are responsible and
what they are responsible for. They must have sufficient authority to ensure that others
comply with the SWMP.
Step 2 – Identify the types and quantities of waste that will be produced at all stages of the
work programme/plan. (See Annex A: Checklist and Annex B: Data Sheet).
Step 3 – Identify waste management options including reference to the waste hierarchy, onand off-site options and pay particular attention to arrangements for identifying and managing
any hazardous wastes produced.
Step 4 – Identify waste management sites and contractors for all wastes that require them
and ensure that the contracts are in place, emphasising compliance with legal responsibilities
such as the Duty of Care. (See Site Data Form).
Step 5 - Carry out any necessary training of in-house and sub-contract staff so that everyone
understands the requirements of your Site Waste Management Plan.
Step 6 – Plan for efficient materials and waste handling and do this early enough bearing in
mind any constraints imposed by the site and it’s location. Based upon steps 2-6 develop
indicative percentage targets for each disposal or waste stream and record on datasheet.
Step 7 – Measure how much waste and what types of waste are produced and compare
these against your SWMP to make sure your are on track to manage all wastes properly and
to learn lessons for next time you have to produce an SWMP. These figures should be
recorded on the datasheet.
Step 8 – Monitor the implementation of the SWMP to make sure that all is going according to
plan, be prepared to update your plan if circumstances change or instigate corrective
measures if failures are identified. Learn lessons for next time from good practice and
benchmarking.
Step 9 – Review how the SWMP worked at the end of the project and identify learning points
for next time – share these with colleagues who may be involved in preparing or using
SWMPs so that they can benefit from your experiences also.
You may wish to compare your achieved percentages against your SWMP targets
on the datasheet and identify learning points.
26
Draft
Appendix F
Provision for Waste Recycling/Composting in Developments
Housing
Specific provision needs to be guided by the number of dwellings provided and location of
existing provisions in the surrounding area. Specific percentages for recycling/composting
space per dwelling have not been proposed due to the different requirements of occupants,
however the following provides a useful guide.
Individual Dwellings (houses)
• Space for recyclables should take account of standard dimensions of recycling boxes (insert
dimensions for each District’s boxes and standard wheelie bins, reflecting also different
collection regimes);
• Utility rooms, designed-in kitchen space, garages, or adjacent to exterior walls provide the
most common solutions;
• Home composting bin provision encourages separation and diversion of organic kitchen and
garden wastes. Such provision requires discussion between LPA and developer at the preapplication stage to assess viability;
Individual Dwellings (flats / apartments)
• Where space allows, initiatives such as those listed above could be included, especially
where gardens/garages are provided;
• Storage areas or a chute system could be provided on each floor or level of blocks of flats /
apartments – storage could be lockable / covered and located close to lifts. Chutes would
need to meet relevant design standards to ensure health and safety of residents and
operatives and to avoid hazard. Regular collection and maintenance would be essential to
avoid attracting vermin.
Groups of Dwellings (houses, flats and/or apartments)
• Provision of a ‘bring’ facility such a recycling banks for glass, paper, cans etc;
• Provision of community composting scheme where there is a nearby use for the product;
• Where community composting is to be provided, operations must be 250 metres from
sensitive land uses and will need to be designed, located, operated and managed to avoid
odour and vermin impacts. Consultation with the Environment Agency on location and
controls will be essential. Such requirements are likely to impinge on the viability of
community schemes;
• Any communal storage facilities must be designed to ensure security of storage to avoid
vandalism / fly tipping.
27
Draft
Commercial, Transport, Leisure, Community, Tourism Development
The exact nature of the development in question will influence the type of waste materials to
be produced by the premise occupier(s). This can be assessed by the applicant when
drawing up details of the development prior to the submission of an application for planning
permission.
Individual Premises
• Provision of purpose built storage areas for both waste materials (for disposal) and
recyclables such as packaging materials;
• Where appropriate, provision of space for the storage of organic waste, where this
is specified as collectable by an identified waste collection / management contractor. Storage
for such materials must be designed to minimise odour and vermin (the EA and
Environmental Health Officers would need to advise on the appropriateness of particular
facilities);
• Provision of deposit points within premises for workers/visitors/customers to place
recyclables.
Groups of premises
• Provision of purpose built storage areas for both waste materials and recyclables that can
be used and jointly serviced by all occupiers of the development;
• Where appropriate, provision of jointly serviced space for the storage of organic waste,
where this is specified as collectable by an identified waste collection / management
contractor. Storage for such materials must be designed to minimise odour and vermin (the
EA and Environmental Health Officers would need to advise on the appropriateness of
particular facilities);
• Communal storage will need to be designed to ensure security;
• Provision of deposit points within premises (inside and outside of buildings) for
workers/visitors/customers to place recyclables.
Car Parking Facilities
• Provision of ‘bring’ facility such as a collection of recycling banks for glass, paper, cans etc
where appropriate;
• Specific provision needs to be guided by the likely number of users of the car park and its
location in terms of transport access for vehicles servicing the facility (e.g. proximity and ease
of access).
28
Draft
Appendix G
Form for preparing a SWMP
(Source: DTI voluntary code of practice for construction contractors and clients, 8/7/04)
29
Draft
Appendix H
List of Useful Documents
BREEAM website www.breeam.co.uk
CEEQUAL - The Civil Engineering Environmental Quality and Assessment Scheme –
Scheme Manual Version 3 (30th June 2004)
Wiltshire and Swindon Waste Minimisation SPG (March 2005)
ODPM Strategic planning for sustainable waste management (Jan 2004)
National Waste Strategy for England and Wales (2002)
English Nature Sector Analysis Construction and Development (Jan 2004)
Environment Agency Position Statement on Sustainable Construction (Jan 2004)
Environment Agency ‘Pollution Prevention Guidance Note 6’ “Working at Construction and
Demolition Sites” (undated)
DETR Building a better quality of Life (Jan 2004)
Welsh Assembly - Waste Minimisation, Good Practice Guide (Jan 2004)
Eco-Recycle Victoria Australia Guidelines for Preparing a Waste Reduction Strategy for
Construction (date?)
CIRA Demonstrating waste minimisation benefits in construction
Resource Venture (Seattle, USA) Contractors guide to recycling
DTI Site Waste Management Plans Guidance for Construction Contractors and Clients (July
2004)
Institute of Civil Engineers (London Remade, Cory Environmental) Demolition Protocol
Implementation Document
Managing Construction and Demolition Debris (North Carolina)
Government of Australia Dept of Environment and Heritage - Waste Reduction Guidelines for
the Construction and Demolition Industry (Nov 2002)
New South Wales Government - Code of best practice for construction and demolition waste
WRAP, The Demolition Protocol: Aggregates Resource Efficiency in Demolition and
Construction - Volume 1 for Policy-makers and Planners (undated)
30
Draft
Appendix I
Glossary & Abbreviations
BREEAM
BRE’s Environmental
Assessment Method
This is used to assess the environmental performance of both
new and existing buildings. It is regarded by the UK's
construction and property sectors as the measure of best
practice in environmental design and management.
DTI
Department of Trade and
Industry
This is a Government Department with the aim to create the best
environment for business success in the UK.
EA
Environment Agency
The body responsible for regulating waste management and
pollution control in England.
ES
Environmental Statement
A systematic and comprehensive analysis of the environmental
impact of a proposed development presented in non-technical
form for public scrutiny.
GCC
Gloucestershire County Council
The Waste Planning Authority for Gloucestershire
LATS
Landfill Allowance Trading
Scheme
LAPC
Local Air Pollution Control
This is Part I of the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) 1990
(The EPA 1990) as the framework for controlling industrial
pollution now replaced by the LAPPC.
LAPPC
Local Authority Pollution
Prevention and Control
LAPPC is part B of the Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC)
Act 1999 and the PPC Regulations 2000 which is the framework
for controlling industrial pollution, replacing the LAPC. LAPPC
focuses on controlling emissions to air only.
MWMS
Municipal Waste Management
Strategy
A statutory document setting out a mainly technical strategy (i.e.
future requirements for waste management facilities, the nature
of those facilities, favourable locations etc.) for municipal waste
management in the County.
PPG
Planning Policy Guidance Note
These set out the Governments policies on different aspects of
planning. They range from key objectives, operational principles
to guidance and advice on more specific issues. Local planning
authorities must take their content into account in preparing
structure and local plans. Currently being superseded by PPS’s.
PPS
Planning Policy Statement
PPS’s replace PPG’s and are prepared by the government after
public consultation to explain statutory provisions and provide
guidance to local authorities and others on planning policy and
the operation of the planning system. Local authorities must take
their contents into account in preparing their Local Development
Frameworks.
RSS
Regional Spatial Strategy
Sets out the region’s policies in relation to the development and
use of land and forms part of the development plan for local
planning authorities. Planning Policy Statement 11 ‘Regional
Spatial Strategies provides detailed guidance on the function and
preparation of Regional Spatial Strategies.
SA
Sustainability Appraisal
A tool for appraising policies to ensure they reflect sustainable
development objectives (i.e. social, environmental and economic
factors) and required in the Act to be undertaken for all local
Local authorities are allocated ‘allowances’ for the amount of
biodegradable municipal waste they can landfill each year until
2020. They can trade allowances with each other, sell
allowances if they have diverted more waste from landfill (e.g.
recycling) or buy more if they are likely to exceed their own
allocation.
31
Draft
development documents.
SEA
Strategic Environmental
Appraisal
A process for testing that environmental concerns are integrated
into the policy appraisal of development plan preparation.
SEPA
Scottish Environment Protection
Agency
The Scottish equivalent of the Environment Agency.
SPD
Supplementary Planning
Document
Provide supplementary information in respect of the policies in
Development Plan Documents. They do not form part of the
Development Plan and are not subject to independent
examination.
SPG
Supplementary Planning
Guidance
Replaced by SPDs, these were prepared under the previous
planning system and fulfilled a similar function to the new style
SPDs.
SWMP
Site Waste Management Plan
It is a document that identifies the waste minimisation that all
onsite personnel are required to follow.
WCA
Waste Collection Authority
Authority responsible for the collection of household and
preparation of Waste Recycling Plans.
WDA
Waste Disposal Authority
Authority responsible for the disposal of local authority collected
waste, and the disposal of waste delivered to Civic Amenity Sites
or Household Waste Recycling Centres.
WLP
Gloucestershire Waste Local
Plan
A statutory land-use plan forming part of the Development Plan
for Gloucestershire. Its purpose is to set out detailed land-use
policies in relation to waste management development in
Gloucestershire.
WMS
Waste Minimisation Statement
A document stating the methods for minimising and managing
waste deriving from a development proposal during its design,
construction and occupation.
32
Draft
Appendix J
Planning Policy Statement 10: Planning for Sustainable Management, July 2005
34. Proposed new development should be supported by site waste management plans of the
type encouraged by the code of practice published by the DTI14. These do not require
formal approval by planning authorities, but are encouraged to identify the volume and
type of material to be demolished and/or excavated, opportunities for the reuse and
recovery of materials and to demonstrate how off-site disposal of waste will be minimised
and managed.
Good Design
35. Good Design and layout in new development can help to secure opportunities for
sustainable waste management, including for kerbside collection and community
recycling as well as for larger waste facilities. Planning authorities should ensure that new
development makes sufficient provision for waste management and promote designs and
layouts that secure the integration of waste management facilities without adverse impact
on the street scene or, in less developed areas, the local landscape.
36. Waste management facilities in themselves should be well designed, so that they
contribute positively to the character and quality of the area in which they are located.
Poor deign is in itself undesirable, undermines community acceptance of waste facilities
and should be rejected.
33
Draft
Appendix K
Non technical summary of the Interim SEA/SA Results
1.1
Under new planning legislation, Gloucestershire’s Waste Local Plan and Minerals
Local Plan are being replaced by the Gloucestershire Minerals and Waste
Development Framework (MWDF). The MWDF will contain a suite of documents
containing policies relating to minerals and waste development in the county. Work
on these documents will continue over a 10-year period. The South West Regional
Spatial Strategy (RSS) is due to be adopted in 2007 and the MWDF should be in
general conformity with it. There is a requirement to minimise waste in the Regional
Waste Management Strategy for the South West 2004 – 2020.
1.2
It is a statutory requirement for the MWDF to undergo a Sustainability Appraisal (SA)
whereby potential social, economic and environmental impacts are identified and
carefully considered. The SA should inform and influence plans early in the process
with the aim of making them more sustainable. This appraisal incorporates the
rigorous requirements of European law, (the SEA Directive), which ensures that
certain plans and programmes are scrutinised for their potential environmental
impact. The initial stages of SA involve gathering evidence and building a framework
against which relevant plans within the suite of the MWDF can be tested.
Gloucestershire County Council has completed these initial stages with the
publication of a Context Report and a Scoping Report. These are available to be
viewed on the Council’s website at the following address:
http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=1405
1.3
The Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) on Waste Minimisation is required to
be tested against this framework. Initially the SPD objectives where tested against
the SA framework objectives and judged to be compatible. (See Table 2). The
appraisal process required consideration of alternative options i.e.:
1. Without the SPD (Business as usual).
2. An SPD based on best practice examples.
3. An SPD based on targets.
Option 2 emerged most favourably with the most positive effects indicated against the
SA objectives (See Paragraph 4.4 and Appendix 1)
1.4
Apart from the testing of options, the purpose of the SA process is to test the potential
social, economic and environmental effects of the SPD. The SEA Directive requires
that a very wide range of possible effects are considered and that recommendations
be made as to how these will be addressed and monitored. The detailed appraisal is
provided in Appendix 2. The SA report also indicates a proposed approach to
monitoring the effects once the SPD is implemented. (See paragraph 5.2)
1.5
This is a draft Interim SA Report for the SPD and is subject to changes. The full SA
report on the SPD will be issued for public consultation with the draft SPD in March /
April of 2006.
34
Draft
Appendix L
Minutes of Expert Group Discussions
Gloucestershire County Council (in partnership with the Six District Councils)
Waste Minimisation Supplementary Planning Document
Expert Group Discussion
9:30am – 13:00pm Wednesday 7th September 2005 at Gloucester City Council
(Committee Room 1, ground floor of North Warehouse)
Agenda
9:30am
Coffee and Registration
9:40am
Welcome and Introductions
9:45am
Agenda Item 1: Presentation (Nick Croft) - Waste Minimisation: The Planning Issue

10:15am
Discussion on thresholds for requiring submission of a waste minimisation
statement (Draft SPD Section 1)
Agenda Item 2: Presentation (Nigel Overall) - Using Recycled Materials in Developments:
Gloucestershire County Council Road Maintenance case study
10:30am
Agenda Item 3: Discussion on managing C&D waste:

What materials can/can’t be used (Draft SPD Section 6)

Target percentages for re-used/recycled material in developments (Draft SPD
Section 6)

Any examples of good practice that could be included in the SPD?
11:30am
Coffee Break
11:45am
Agenda Item 4: Discussion on incorporating recycling schemes into developments (Draft SPD
Sections 5 and 7):
12:50pm
Summing up
13:00pm
Close

Design solutions for storing recycling boxes (internal & external) (Draft SPD Section
5 and Appendix F)

Collection requirements (external storage/operatives/vehicles) (Draft SPD Section
7)

Use of Section 106 agreements and planning conditions (Draft SPD Section 4)

What requirements should the SPD contain (Draft SPD Section 8)?
35
Draft
List of Attendees to Expert Group (7th September 2005) to discuss the Waste Minimisation SPD
Meyrick Brentnal
Gloucester City Council
Frances Robertson
Friends of the Earth (Gloucestershire)
Chris Brown
Gloucestershire County Council
Martin Chandler
Cheltenham Borough Council
Verity Small
Smiths Plant Hire
Martin Everett
Environment Agency
Laura Hackwood
Environment Agency
Carole Bond
Envirowise
Carlos Novoth
Representing Gloucestershire’s Waste Collection Authorities
Cat Phelps
Gloucester City Council
Paul Wormald
Grundon Waste Management Ltd
Andrew Jackson
Westbury Plc
Simon Ford
All Stone Sand & Gravel Aggregates Trading Co Ltd
David Maslen
Moreton C Cullimore and Son Ltd
David Glenn
Huntsmans Quarries
Peter King
Halcrow
Nigel Overall
Gloucestershire County Council
Kevin Phillips
Gloucestershire County Council
Nick Croft
Gloucestershire County Council
Charlotte Weeks
Gloucestershire County Council
David Ingleby
Gloucestershire County Council
36
Draft
Name
Comments
Kevin Phillips
Welcome and introduction. KP to chair the meeting.
Nick Croft
Presentation on supplementary planning documents (SPDs), waste minimisation principles & issues.
Kevin Phillips
Agenda Item 1 on Thresholds for Submitting a Waste Minimisation Statement.
Frances Robertson
The SPD needs to be applied to every development or else the Districts will not meet their targets. We might want certain aspects to apply to every
household. Major applications should have a waste minimisation statement (WMS) and smaller applications could carry out a checklist? Information leaflets
would also be useful.
If there is an application for development of 9 houses then the threshold of >10 houses for a major application would mean that a 9 house development would
fall out of the loop and not have to carry out a waste minimisation statement (WMS) even though this development could be deemed equally major.
There is a problem with the whole concept of demolition particularly in Conservation Areas. Developers in Conservation Areas have to have an application to
demolish. In these cases you would dismantle a building and re-use the materials, which is therefore more sophisticated protocol for a demolition audit.
Paul Wormald
Are you talking about sash windows, cornice pieces etc.?
Frances Robertson
Also old bricks for example. Developers creating new builds could use these old reclaimed materials as these are now becoming more appealing to property
buyers.
Paul Wormald
There is a lot of material out there that can be recovered.
Frances Robertson
I agree. Dismantling rather than demolition is useful and developers should audit old buildings pre-demolition to evaluate what value in terms of reusable
materials could be gained from the building.
Nick Croft
Good point, but this is a lot of work that is ultimately to be implemented by the Districts.
Kevin Phillips
Do the Districts have any comments on this?
Meyrick Brentnal
Development Control (DC) officers will maintain that they are overwhelmed with applications and will be reluctant for extra work. The SPD needs to be clear
and not over complicate matters. Although agree with Frances principles, it is not possible for every application to be caught by this SPD.
Kevin Phillips
For a lot of developments this document will provide enough information for DC officers. It is an important point though as there is a resource issue if WMS’s
are required for all developments.
Carlos Novoth
The whole infrastructure may be too complicated for DC officers to look at? Even the basics of waste storage can be ignored by developers so it may be that
just highlighting the need to think about waste issues early on is enough.
Frances Robertson
Cheltenham Borough Council has a Sustainable Construction SPG. It would be useful if this SPD were linked to it.
Paul Wormald
The SPD should target the people who produce the waste in the first place such as the site managers.
Andrew Jackson
We have found that different District Council’s have different requirements for example South Gloucestershire demand a waste minimisation statement
regardless of the size of the development.
Kevin Phillips
We are aware that they use different policies covering this.
Draft
Nick Croft
Is there a development control officer opinion on implementing this SPD?
Martin Chandler
I think using the ODPM thresholds (cut off points) for large developments is sensible. Developers and DC officers are both aware of them. Imposing further
requirements for developers (including small scale) would be very difficult. The issues are less significant for small developments so I would prefer to only
make the requirement for WMS on large developments defined by the ODPM threshold.
Frances Robertson
If you make the threshold black and white some developments may be missed that are important or controversial, but just don’t fit into the threshold.
Nick Croft
It appears therefore that we agree to use thresholds, but potentially with a caveat that developments likely to produce a lot of waste are proposed that they
too are captured. This though would require an element of case officer judgement when an application is submitted.
Martin Chandler
We need to get consistency around the County so that developers know what is required of them.
Meyrick Brentnal
This SPD could be a safety net and will create consistency across the County in terms of what is required from developers. DC is overstretched and is a
production line.
Simon Ford
Could conditions be used to state these requirements, as this would seem easier?
Nick Croft
In the past, a condition was used requiring a waste management stage to be submitted. However, the problem with this method is that the planning decision
has already been made. This SPD seeks to make developers think about ways to deal with waste early on from the design stage otherwise waste
management becomes an add on and is often too late to make the best design decisions.
Kevin Phillips
The adopted SPD will be used as part of the planning application stage. The development proposal along with a waste minimisation statement should be
submitted together.
Simon Ford
I have recently been involved in a housing demolition project where I could have burnt all the waste produced on site, as there was no planning condition
preventing me from doing so. I did not burn the material but there was nothing to stop me.
Nick Croft
As part of the negotiations with developers, a discussion around what to do with the waste should be included.
Chris Brown
Good point, need to make waste important and worthwhile to developers.
Paul Wormald
Doesn’t the market have the lead in encouraging developers to use waste more efficiently anyway?
Nick Croft
Yes, it has been found during the evidence gathering stage of the SPD that most developers already optimise the use of waste on site as common practice
because it is cost effective and makes financial sense to do so.
Paul Wormald
In that case do we need to target mid tier developers rather than large developers who do it anyway?
Frances Robertson
Currently there are no restrictions on burning on site. Could there be a condition applied to the waste during and post development, as the design stage
would only affect large developments anyway?
Kevin Phillips
Due to time restrictions, we should move on to the next presentation.
Nigel Overal
Agenda Item 2: Presentation on using recycled materials in developments: Gloucestershire County Council Road Maintenance case study.
Kevin Phillips
In terms of proposals on state roads (private developers), they presumably acquire their own materials from private suppliers and not from the County
Council?
38
Draft
Nigel Overal
Part of the new contract/tender has asked contractors how to open up the market for supplying material to external sources. Currently, we only deal with inhouse waste.
Chris Brown
For example, a lot of waste generated from GCHQ has gone into state roads e.g. in Tewkesbury and Cheltenham.
Kevin Phillips
What tonnages per annum are recycled?
Nigel Overal
These figures can be misleading. Need to be specific when recording & quoting these figures. At present only materials that we produce in house and reuse/recycle in our own works are recorded. Therefore if the material goes out to an external source then it currently isn’t included in the figures. Last year we
recycled 40,000 tonnes. This is a significant proportion of all the waste generated. We are looking at new targets for example for imported materials.
Kevin Phillips
Agenda Item 3: Managing C&D Waste. Firstly, what materials can/can’t be used?
Andrew Jackson
On contaminated sites (such as an old landfill site) permission may be given to allow material for capping the top of the landfill, but if the landfill needs to be
dug into for some reason, such as installing services then the material (waste) extracted is not permitted to be replaced into the ground where it originated.
This causes a lot of problems in terms of how to deal with this extra waste generated such as transportation of the waste off site to an appropriate facility.
Martin Everett
We acknowledge that this is a significant issue. Work is on-going within the EA looking at this. Often there is a serious environmental risk in these cases and
so legislation kicks in. These sorts of cases will increase in the future with new legislation encouraging development on brown field sites. The industry should
lobby DEFRA on these issues.
Kevin Phillips
Are there cost issues involved in treating the waste on site?
Martin Everett
Yes, legislation does not address this problem but work is going on to change this.
Frances Robertson
Hazardous waste in the County is a big issue – we are still waiting for the relevant chapter in the Regional Waste Strategy. Hazardous waste could be
reduced in the design stage. For example some paints that are used may become a hazardous waste source going to landfill when the building is demolished
in the future. Paints could be water based reducing hazardous waste in the future.
Paul Wormald
Another example is aluminium being coated or galvanised being more difficult to recycle in the future due to added energy costs removing the galvanisation
or paint etc.
Peter King
Recycled aggregates are currently judged against primary aggregate specifications.
Verity Small
Have you had any problems with specifications of recycled aggregates?
Peter King
Some recycled aggregate products still have tar on them e.g. planings. This creates storage problems as it is classed as hazardous waste even though the
tar is usually ingrained and unlikely to come off. It is currently only acceptable to recycle planings back into a bitumen end product such as foam base.
Paul Wormald
Do you come across any other contaminants?
Peter King
No not really. In 1985, it was found that actually only a little demolition waste went to landfill, most was re-used as inferior aggregates. In the last 20 years the
industry has tried to highlight that recycled aggregates can be used for higher-grade applications and used in the best way that they can. For example,
crushed concrete can be re-cycled back into concrete. Ideally we need to make the best use of the material as much as possible not just recycling for the
sake of meeting recycling targets.
Frances Robertson
For individual developments it is not worth taking the material offsite, it may be the best environmental option to re-use the material at the source in a nothing
39
on – nothing off policy.
Draft
David Glenn
The issue of sufficient space may make it difficult to achieve this in every development. Recycling of materials requires a large amount of space in order for
materials to be placed in storage piles. The piles may be stored for different periods of time in case there is no current market for that particular product
(seasonality). Therefore it may not be practical to store materials where they originated.
Peter King
Agreed, this is an area of planning that some people are unsure about how to treat, handle and store material.
Martin Everett
Large-scale industrial operators have far greater capacity but there are issues in identifying sufficient land for large-scale industrial operations that can satisfy
the demand.
Nigel Overal
If we use our own material instead of selling it to external sources then you don’t have to worry about where it came from.
Carole Bond
Is there a case for a resource (waste) exchange in Gloucestershire? It may be worth investigating the economic opportunities for small operators in using a
resource exchange at a forum.
Verity Small
We do have small operators already selling material to us.
David Maslen
The Government is pushing for recycling anyway through various taxes e.g. the aggregates tax.
Peter King
There are very few materials that can’t be recycled. Blacktop (top layer) is a problem, as it needs to have a certain skid resistance and other stringent
specifications. We need to get away from selling waste out to external recyclers.
David Glenn
The County Council may be doing a disservice in not selling waste to recyclers.
Nigel Overal
In our targets, we have found that it may be cost effective to share recycled materials than only using our own waste. The whole design element is thought
through for example using thinner amounts of bitumen.
Verity Small
Back to the issue of planings, I was under the impression that this was good aggregate, but it is now classed as waste.
Peter King
We are not allowed to use planings as high quality aggregate as it is difficult to compact in some cases. However, the main problem is in concrete as it is
usually visible.
Verity Small
It can be used on tracks (haul roads) though.
Peter King
In that case then it’s no problem.
Verity Small
It is still a grey area though.
Martin Everett
We need to be pragmatic on where to draw a line on what to allow exemptions on. I don’t want to stop a local farmer mending his track with a couple of
tonnes, but it can then get more complex with bigger possibly contaminated loads and potential issues with floodplains etc.
Frances Robertson
There are other waste arisings other than C & D waste from residential developments, which we have mainly been talking about. Different types of waste
arisings are produced in different stages of development. There was a recent study by Cardiff University on the significance of packaging of building
materials e.g. single trip pallets. Packaging waste is a large proportion of the waste arisings. In the past people were paid for the pallets used on site, now
they are thrown away and not recycled.
Simon Ford
We work with builders and skips are used for all packaging waste etc. and are sent to us to sort.
Frances Robertson
But this waste would be better sorted at the source to prevent cross contamination.
40
Draft
Simon Ford
Why if we do it for them?
Verity Small
It does happen on sites where it can be done.
Frances Robertson
Not only could developers reduce over ordering, but they also need to look at the end use of materials. The people around this table know about how to deal
with waste but the large majority of small operators may not.
Paul Wormald
Small operators generally have small amounts of waste and would send the material to waste management sites for sorting as there may not be enough room
on site.
Simon Ford
We took waste from the GCHQ site and we specified that waste should not be mixed but put in separate skips. It turned out that when the skips were brought
back the materials were mixed and we had to sort it.
Chris Brown
Developers need to do it but maybe need to promote the work they are doing?
Paul Wormald
As devil’s advocate, if developers are already doing it then why do we need an SPD that creates extra paperwork?
Simon Ford
Because we still need to deal with small developers.
Martin Everett
There are ways to reduce the amount of packaging that you buy, for example B & Q offer a low rate lower packaging product, so you pay for less packaging
and less waste.
Meyrick Brentnal
The market is driving this anyway. What the SPD needs to do is stimulate the market and should be used as a guide show to the requirements.
David Maslen
Surely the developers would use the cheapest option available.
Meyrick Brentnal
If all developers use recycled materials then it would bring the price down.
David Glenn
It is the smaller developers, which need to think about waste management, but unfortunately it may mean that we end up with more waste minimisation
statements and more work.
Carole Bond
Envirowise is a government programme to provide advice to developers in reducing waste. It has researched the waste horizons for all developers. We have
case studies of small and medium developers, which may be useful for the SPD. Research has demonstrated that there is something for everyone to gain.
There is a helpline for people needing advice for all developments and local visits can be arranged to provide individual sites advice on how to improve waste
management and reduce costs. There is a need to stress to developers that money can be made from recycling. There is an advantage of smaller
companies becoming more involved. They could look to the SPD for advice.
Frances Robertson
A lot of developers are architects and they could be another area targeted by the SPD. Anything that makes the architect think about waste in the design
stage is a good thing. Not just developers need to look at reducing waste.
Verity Small
We must not force too much onto small operators or they will be reluctant to recycle and may be unable to keep up economically. We need to educate them
instead. The reason construction packaging is done is to protect the products. If the products are damaged then you could end up with a lot more waste to
dispose of.
Kevin Phillips
Lets go over targets – do we need any and what sort? (Section 6 of the SPD)
Meyrick Brentnal
An inspector would never have accepted targets in the past. However now targets are more acceptable e.g. renewable energy plans. From a planning
41
Draft
viewpoint it is now important to have targets.
Frances Robertson
How do you tackle where the material was sourced? What percentages would you use? How do you make sure that waste is minimised in the first place and
then deal with left over waste? Maybe you could use sliding target? What happens when the targets are not met? I don’t have the answers I’m just asking the
questions. There are clear problems with targets e.g. if they are set too low – it may stifle innovation etc.
David Glenn
What are you going to be measuring? Will it be on tonnage or value of the material? For example how do you measure plastics against builder’s rubble?
Martin Chandler
DC officers don’t have the expertise to go through the demolition phase. It would be better to have a best practice guide rather than use actual targets.
Frances Robertson
Could you set a minimum target to achieve?
Nick Croft
We could use aspirational targets and then you are not stifling progression in the industry.
Carlos Novoth
There is a significant problem in that the data on waste and tonnages is very poor. We just don’t know the tonnages. Could we use best practice as a
starting point until we know and understand what sort of targets are needed.
Chris Brown
It depends on the development type & what’s being recycled. Bearing this in mind, a lack of targets is better.
Kevin Phillips
It will vary on a case-by-case basis and there appears to be consensus that the use of targets is not the best way forward. OK, after the coffee break lets
move onto how we can incorporate recycling schemes into development, including design and collection requirements.
10 minute coffee break taken
Carlos Novoth
Gloucestershire Waste Partnership consists of the County and all 6 Districts. All six districts vary in their methods and schemes for collecting waste. Some
may use wheelie bins and some may collect garden waste and some may not. There is a large amount of difference between all 6 districts. Gloucestershire
waste partnership has been working for 6 months and important decisions are being made on source separation on individual materials or whether to use a
mixture of materials. Targets have been given to the County by Central Government in which to meet, but not sure how we don’t have the money to do it. The
LATS targets are the main driver in the County but face huge fines if we don’t meet the targets – in the millions of pounds.
We are trying to find a level playing field and systems, which all the districts can all fit into. It may take 5 -10 years to achieve. Like householders, developers
need to know what methods of collection are being employed in the particular District. In order for the SPD to work we need to get developers to contact the
correct district in order to get the proper advice on design and specifics etc.
Kevin Phillips
The issue of targets are highlighted again.
Martin Everett
Large sheds are needed to deal with the waste as part of the infrastructure.
Kevin Phillips
How do we ensure that the right mechanisms are designed in to deal with the waste? Take for example a development of 100 houses. How do we ensure the
most effective use of recycling?
Paul Wormald
Aren’t we required to do this anyway?
Martin Chandler
This should be dealt with in the pre-application stage. The developers should be told to talk to the correct district waste collection authority. It needs to be
flagged up that recycling and collection are important and should be designed in. We need mechanisms in place to make sure that they are included and
direct them to the various bodies. Then we don’t need legal agreements and conditions. We could invalidate schemes that don’t have the recycling element.
Kevin Phillips
This links in to the next topic for discussion.
42
Draft
Agenda Item 4: Incorporating Recycling Schemes into Developments
Frances Robertson
It is recognised that communal buildings are not well serviced in terms of recycling collections/facilities. We don’t want to direct developers to provide understorage bins if the WCA cannot deal with it. Storage for wheelie bins and boxes is a problem for communal buildings. There needs to be something explicit in
the SPD and appropriate for a particular area. So far we have concentrated on residential properties, but we should also target commercial developments as
they also produce waste and may have more space to allow for waste separation.
Paul Wormald
Agreed, tonnages are greater from commercial developments than municipal household ones. We need to deal with waste on industrial sites that generally
have enough space to do so.
Nick Croft
In Appendix F, I have tried to encompass these issues, but should it be more explicit or not?
Carlos Novoth
It gives good guidance as it covers virtually every situation, but there is still the issue of differences between the districts. It is ridiculous how waste collection
has been forgotten in urban design. For example, in Stroud town centre where recently bins were being placed on the highway because there was a lack of
space for storage. We need to look at the life cycle of buildings.
Nick Croft
It is an important issue. Do the districts feel confident to give the expertise or point to the relevant people?
Carlos Novoth
Gloucester City Council have produced a Section 106 agreement which is very comprehensive, but there needs to be consistency across the districts.
Meyrick Brentnal
In the last presentation training of staff was suggested and this should be an integral part of the process. It may not be for the SPD but it may be useful to
start training sessions in each local authority to DC staff in order to make them aware of the SPD and members could also be included.
Kevin Phillips
Meyrick, have you had any problems with multiple occupancy builds?
Meyrick Brentnal
Listed building constraints have been an issue.
Frances Robertson
Need to think about possible future waste collection facilities and requirements with room for expansion. For example, more boxes may be introduced in the
future and this needs to be provided for. Can you require that an agreement be made with the developers?
Martin Chandler
We could make developers aware of future changes and work these things in to the development in order to be flexible enough to change with the times.
Kevin Phillips
How should we deal with the development of an industrial or commercial site? The advice from a WCA may highlight very different issues.
Frances Robertson
Need to have stringent conditions.
Martin Chandler
But how would you enforce it? How would you know if a storage area to the rear of a building was being used in accordance with its planning permission?
Frances Robertson
The public will be the first to highlight it if things are not done correctly!
Paul Wormald
Could an area be allocated solely for the use of recycling? Then stop them using the area for anything other than for waste storage. There is a need to
educate the commercial sector as well as the household sector.
Nigel Overal
The problem is you have to make the space available for recycling. Some people have garages, which aren’t used this space should be made available.
Soon it will become the culture to recycle and provide space for boxes etc. The important thing is that if you have set aside an area for recycling as part of
the permission, and it is subsequently used for other purposes, if there is deemed to be a problem enforcement measures can be taken to return that area to
waste/recycling use. If the area is not there then it may be difficult to find sufficient space at a later date.
Carlos Novoth
Presumably the SPD will be regularly reviewed so that we can change things gradually. So we can learn from our mistakes in the future.
43
Draft
Kevin Phillips
The Waste Local Plan (WLP) will be replaced with 3 or 4 documents. This is one of the first documents that will be adopted under the new regulations. Once
the whole framework is finished then we will have a better idea of how to deal with it.
Frances Robertson
Have Wiltshire finished their SPD? It would be useful to see what has happened on the ground in terms of planning applications.
Nick Croft
Yes, it was adopted in March 2005. Appendix F is to some extent lifted from their SPD. It is a culmination of a lot of people’s opinions. They now want to
move it on and take on board what they have learnt. Some feedback on the SPD has been that there are problems enforcing it.
Frances Robertson
It will be useful to see what is proposed and how they coped with it. I’m all for advice and guidance but if it is not used then it is not any good.
Kevin Phillips
If the SPD is complete then the policy framework is in place. I think I am right in saying that the RTPI gave Wiltshire an award for their SPD.
Frances Robertson
There are plans to build 30,000 new dwellings in Gloucestershire in the near future in the Joint Study Area (JSA). We need to think about this in terms of
waste arisings. It is a case of development mania. The SPD needs to be something that people can use and the planning officers are willing to work with.
Nick Croft
As with targets, would a few examples of best practice case studies be of use?
Frances Robertson
Yes, we need good examples of best practice. These would be useful.
Carlos Novoth
With regard to collection requirements, collection vehicles are getting bigger for example some 21 tonne vehicles are being replaced with 26 tonne vehicles
and are also getting longer. Some vehicles are 4 or 5ft longer. Therefore, adequate turning space is required. There is also the issue of providing collections
in developments that are part finished and part inhabited. There needs to be a system in place where the developer makes the WCA aware of progress on
the development particularly when homes are inhabited and producing waste. Later on, collections have to be shuffled around and it is usually at the last
minute. This makes the Council look bad to the public if waste is not collected when expected.
Another issue for collection vehicles are areas of adopted or soon to be adopted roads. There is no indication whether a road is adopted or not and if
damage is caused to non-adopted roads and potentially the services beneath it such as private driveways, then the WCA is faced with a claim for
compensation if damage is caused.
Chris Brown
In order for developers to recognise the size of collection vehicles they should ask the responsible WCA. It is the developer’s responsibility to make the road
up to scratch before it can be adopted. Ask the developers to tell the WCA if any buildings are occupied. The argument to make with the developer should
be that if they don’t indemnify the WCA against any damage then the WCA will not collect their waste.
Carlos Novoth
The customer is the most important person, but they have no connection with the planning stage.
Meyrick Brentnal
It is equally the WCA’s job to communicate with the planners.
Frances Robertson
It is also about access to collect waste as well as providing space for it.
Martin Chandler
You could ask for notices to be put out to the occupants of the half finished development asking them to inform the WCA when their house is occupied.
Nick Croft
Is section 8 of the document useful for DC officers?
Frances Robertson
The checklist in the SPD should refer to all those issues dealt with in Policy 36.
Martin Chandler
The checklist is useful, we use checklists a lot. There is no reason why this wouldn’t work. With experience the DC officers would know what to look for, but
initially expert advice is useful.
Nick Croft
An example of a site waste management plan taken from the DTI guide is in Appendix G of the SPD.
44
Draft
Paul Wormald
Agree that this is a good practical solution. How complex is the SPD going to be? Anything more than a couple of sides is not going to be useable for the
average small operator.
Frances Robertson
Along with this SPG what would help is if the planning application forms were updated and the amount of space on the forms should be increased in order to
provide sufficient detail.
Martin Chandler
One form for all applications is going to be brought out soon.
Martin Everett
The fitting out of homes/premises is a significant issue. These can be large sources of waste and fly tipping. This transitional phase between building and
occupation is a difficult one. If facilities are in place as early as possible, the occupants get into the habit of using them and then this behaviour gets fixed in.
Chris Brown
Isn’t this a bit complicated for the SPD?
Nick Croft
Yes, possibly, but it is still useful to know for background information.
Kevin Phillips
Thanks to all for coming. If there are any issues that have been raised that need further attention there is a possibility of other meetings in the future. We will
incorporate the comments made in this meeting into the revised draft of the SPD, which will go to informal consultation during the Autumn.
45