TECHNOLOGICAL SECTOR RESEARCH (2000-2006) STRAND III GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATION Background The principal function of the institutions in the Technological Sector is the provision of vocational and technical education and training for the economic, technological, scientific, commercial, industrial, social and cultural development of the State with particular regard to the requirements of a knowledge-driven economy and the regions served by individual institutions. They are widely dispersed across the country and have a significant regional focus. The objective of this sub-measure is to support and strengthen the research capability of the sector through enabling the institutions to focus on research projects based on the core strengths of the institutions individually or of the sector as a whole. The sub-measure comprises three strands: Strand I Postgraduate R&D Skills Programme Strand II Enterprise Platform Programme Strand III Core Research Strengths Enhancement Strand III: Core Research Strengths Enhancement The institutions in this sector have, over time, developed strengths in particular areas of research activity. The purpose of this strand is to provide support for research, institutionally strategic or, more broadly, sectorally strategic through collaboration within the sector, that will enhance those strengths. It will be a competitive process based on proposals from institutions that are targeted at developing the core research capability of the institutions in the sector through a process of peer review. 1 This strand will be aimed at funding postdoctoral or other experienced researchers in addition to postgraduate students and developing the expertise of existing academic staff in research to build core strengths. Proposals will be judged on three criteria: 1. Strategic Relevance 2. Research Quality 3. Impact on Teaching Quality There are 6 cycles for which Institutions may compete. Institutions are invited to put forward project streams which they wish to develop. The maximum allocation within any cycle to any stream of research within an institution should be €300,000. Applications, therefore, depending on the needs of the institutions should be for amounts up to €300,000 per stream. The adjudication panel will have discretion to fund proposals for amounts up to €300,000 per stream. There is no maximum on the number of streams, which may be submitted by an Institute; but in any competition no Institute may be awarded more than one third of the funds. Objectives of Strand III: (i) To enable a strategic and planned approach by Institutes of Technology to the longterm development of their research capabilities. Of particular importance is the development of areas of core competence, which, while exhibiting some acknowledged strengths, are not yet in a position to compete for funding under the PRTLI initiative. Thus the funding should be seen as complementary to the latter initiative. A key objective is the promotion of teams of researchers who will remain in their institutions; rather than individual researchers who can easily move on and take the totality of their expertise with them. (ii) Promotion and building up of a research ethos appropriate to the differing roles played by individual institutions. (iii) To make a positive contribution to the quality of teaching in the institutions. Guidelines for Funding Proposals might include funding for some of the following: 2 Funding for postdoctoral or other experienced researchers Reduction of lecturing load of key research leader(s) Funding for Researcher to spend significant period in a ‘Centre of Excellence’ in the research area covered by the proposal (i.e. short term sabbaticals) Funding for a specific facility/equipment/technology required to underpin the development of a capability/expertise in a specific research niche or specialisation Collaboration with other research centres/linkage with other research bodies Multidisciplinary Aspect Funding for postgraduate students or research assistants Applications Each stream submitted by an Institution should be submitted as a separate application by the Institution and signed by the Director of that Institution. Each application should not exceed 30 pages for the main section (appendices can be added) and should be accompanied by the attached summary application form (Appendix II). The main application should be divided into six sections. In responding to these sections the Institute should be aware of the proposed marking scheme for proposals which is set out in detail in Appendix I. Seven copies of each application and summary form should be submitted together with original. Section 1. Institute’s Research Strategy and Relevance of Project Stream to this Strategy Including a description of the research planning processes leading to the proposal and evidence that the proposal will build on existing strengths; justification for proposal; extent to which the proposal embraces the institutional capacity for applied Research and Development and or technology transfer activities; evidence to suggest that the proposal will lead to formation of a high quality research group; effectiveness of the proposed strategy in achieving objectives; potential for added value; objective/external indicators (reports etc.) of importance to research area. Section 2. Description of the Proposed Research Including a description of the inherent significance and technical quality of the research itself; the implementation of the work (construction, refitting, equipment purchase, staff and student 3 recruitment, progression of the research work, monitoring, reporting) on a six-monthly phased basis; contribution of collaborators internal to and external to the institute; how the work can strengthen and develop knowledge of the research topic among the staff members involved and other staff members in the discipline through seminars, publications and other means; how it helps to implement the institute’s strategy, develops (a) high quality self-sustaining research team(s) and enhances the institute’s capacity for applied R&D and technology transfer; other benefits of the research and its outcomes to the institute, industry and society. Section 3. Description of the Relevance of the Proposed Research to the Teaching Mission of the Institute Including related courses; quality assurance procedures in teaching programmes to facilitate research techniques and outcomes enriching taught courses including project work, and stimulating the development of new courses dealing with advanced technologies at all levels. Section 4. Achievements of the Researchers Including a brief CV of each researcher involved, giving teaching experience; publications, particularly publications relevant to the proposed research; research grants obtained and research contracts completed; PhD and MPhil/MSc students supervised with dates of completion; patents and technology transfers achieved; collaborative research experiences, including collaborations external to the institute; exhibitions; other highlights. Key information on each researcher should be limited to one page with additional information placed in an appendix. Section 5. Itemised Financial Plan for the Proposed Research Including, by year, capital costs (construction, fees, furniture and fittings, special equipment of over €12,000 per item; recurrent costs (staff replacement, postdoctoral fellows, postgraduate student stipends, equipment of less than €12,000 per item, materials and consumables, travel, publications, institutional overheads and others). Items of expenditure should be clearly linked to a particular activity. All costs should be adequately justified. Section 6 Describe Measurable Outcomes from the Project and Milestones that can be used to measure progress 4 Reporting Each institution must ensure that project streams are properly managed to achieve the stated outcomes. Regular technical and financial reports will be required to ensure a draw down of funds. Institutions Eligible This measure is open to the thirteen Institutions approved under the Regional Technical Colleges Act 1992 and to the Dublin Institute of Technology. 5 Appendix I TECHNOLOGICAL SECTOR RESEARCH STRAND III SCORING SCHEME Strategic Relevance 35 points The quality of the strategic research planning processes in the institute/faculty including evidence of their establishment and evaluation and extent to which they build on existing strengths Justification that the proposal submitted results from a prioritisation process based on the strategy. Extent to which proposal enhances the Institutional capacity for applied R&D and technology transfer activities Evidence to support the case that the proposal will lead to the development of a high quality research group/team (multiplier effect) Likely effectiveness of the proposed strategy in achieving the stated objectives Potential for additional ‘added value’ which might be achieved as result of this funding Objective/external indicators (reports etc.) of importance to research area Research Quality 40 points The technical quality of the research proposal and the ability of the proposal to strengthen and develop the knowledge base of the relevant staff in the core area The achievements of the relevant researchers including consideration of publications, applied research contracts completed, evidence of achievements in technology transfer, previous collaborative experiences, exhibitions, etc. Impact on Teaching Quality 25 points This criterion is concerned with the contribution that the proposal makes to the quality of teaching at all levels in the institution. Specifically the proposal should demonstrate: How it will interact with, inform and support the teaching programme and develop programme quality. (Evidence of formal procedures). 6 Appendix II TECHNOLOGICAL SECTOR RESEARCH: STRAND III CORE RESEARCH STRENGTHS ENHANCEMENT Year 2005 Summary Application Form For Office Use Only Institute: Programme Code CRS/05 Notes: 1. Please read General Guidelines and Conditions on the Core Research Strengths Enhancement Programme prior to completing the Summary Application Form. 2. The Summary Application Form is to be accompanied by a full description of the programme proposed (maximum 30 pages) and divided into six sections as set out in the Guidelines. This application form is available by e-mail from: Kate.wiseman@councilofdirectors.ie Closing date and time for applications for DIT’s internal assessment: Friday, 30th September at 5.00pm. 7 Institute: ______________________________________________________________ Project Stream Contact: _____________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Institute: __________________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Telephone: _________________________ Fax: _________________________________ e-mail: _____________________________________________________________________ Project Stream Title: _________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ I hereby declare that the direct costs detailed in this application are not being funded from any other source. Also, an application for funding for this programme will not be made to any other programme or Institution while it is being evaluated under the Core Research Strengths Enhancement Programme. ______________________________________ Signature of Principal Investigator/Co-ordinator Date: ___________ ______________________________________ Signature of Director Date: ___________ 8 Institute: ___________________________________________________________________ Summary Costs in Respect of Project Stream Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Research Workers Costs of Teaching Relief for Key Researcher(s) Equipment (over €12,000) Materials (including equipment under €12,000) Travel and Maintenance External Consultancy Other (please specify)** Total Annual Cost of Project Stream Total Project Stream Cost: ____________________________ over 3 years Grant requested*: ______________________________ * Note the grant for any project stream in any one application cannot exceed €300,000 ** Please note direct support will not be provided for taught postgraduate courses under this strand. 9 Summary description of proposed project stream not to exceed 400 words. A full description of the proposed Project Stream not exceeding 30 pages, should follow. This proposal should be set out in 6 sections as outlined. Seven copies of this proposal should be submitted together with the original. 10