www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education Ancient Greece Team Project In a group of 3 you are to select a topic to research. Your group will construct an Information Poster and deliver an Oral Presentation to the class on your selected topic. Topics to choose from: o Government in Athens and Sparta o The Trojan War o The Spartans o Daily Life in Athens o The Golden Age of Greece o The Olympic Games You will be assessed on: o Your ability to effectively work in a team o The research questions that will guide your research o Research skills and synthesis of information gathered o Poster layout o Spelling and grammar o Oral presentation skills Refer to the Assessment Rubric for more information on how you and your team will be assessed. Step 1: Team work To produce a successful project, your team needs to work productively and cooperatively. Therefore, roles and tasks within the team need to be allocated equally and fairly. Furthermore, good team work requires effort and constant evaluation. Use the checklist below to reflect on how well you and your team are progressing throughout the project. Effective team members: Help to direct the team to meet goals Do not prevent the team from meeting goals Care about the goals of the team Participate actively to complete goals Collect information for the project Performs all duties assigned Share ideas with the team Listen attentively to team mates Encourage team mates to share ideas Last updated: 12.06.07 Make fair decisions Involve the whole team in the project Encourage the team to evaluate how well they are working Resolve team conflicts Mentor fellow team members © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education Step 2: Develop research questions Once your team has selected a topic you are required to develop key research questions to guide your research. To help you construct appropriate questions complete the following table. Design questions that specifically relate to your topic What was? What did? Where was? Where did? When was? When did? Who was? Who did? Why was? Why did? How was? How did? How does _______ compare to Ancient Egypt? Extension: How does Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education _______ compare to the present? Extension: How does _______ compare to the Middle Ages? As a team, refine your questions and select 6 questions to research. Your team may decide to research extension questions (this is optional). Complete the table below and show your teacher. Your Topic: Research Question 1: Research Question 2: Research Question 3: Research Question 4: Research Question 5: Research Question 6: Step 3: Gather information Begin researching your topic and collecting information. Ensure you keep a record of all sources used. Your bibliography needs to look like this: Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education For Books Title (underlined) Place of Publication Mastos, Maria (2000) Great Greeks , Longman, Melbourne. UU Authors Name (last name then first name) UU Year of Publication (in brackets) Name of Publisher For Internet Sites UU Ancient Olympics (retrieved via Internet on 3 October 2006) www.ancientgreece.com UU Title (underlined) Date retrieved (in brackets) Web Address Step 4: Synthesis of research Take notes from the sources you have collected. Make sure that you always use your own words. Use a dictionary to help you understand any new terminology you may come across. All members of the team need help each other develop a thorough understanding of the topic and ensure that the research questions are being answered. Step 5: Poster Produce the poster. Make sure that the layout is logical and eye-catching and includes a border, bold heading, sub headings, relevant diagrams and labels. Step 6: Oral presentation Organise the oral presentation. You must prepare cue cards and include relevant visuals to engage the audience. Remember to practice. Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education Step 7: Evaluation Once your team has submitted the poster and presented the oral you need to evaluate the performance of one of your team mates. You must do so by completing the ‘Peer Evaluation of Team Work Skills’. Step 8: Reflection Finally, you need to write a diary entry on how well you worked within your team by answering the following questions: o How did I contribute to the team? o What team work skills did I demonstrate? o How can I improve my team work skills? Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education Ancient Greece Team Project – Peer Evaluation of Team Work Skills Peer Evaluation of ___________________ By ___________________ Never Rarely 0 1 Sometimes 2 Often Always 3 4 Helps to direct the team to meet goals Doesn’t prevent the team from meeting goals Cares about the goals of the team Participates actively to complete goals Collects information for the project Performs all duties assigned Shares ideas with the team Listens attentively to team mates Encourages team mates to share ideas Makes fair decisions Involves the whole team in the project Encourages the team to evaluate their performance Resolves team conflicts Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education Mentors fellow team members Comments Total /56 Assessment Task Title: Ancient Greece Team Project Domains: Humanities – History Interpersonal Development – Working In Teams Levels: 5 Describe the learning and teaching experiences happening in your classroom This assessment task is a part of our study of Ancient Civilizations. During Term 3, I introduced the class to the study of History and to the key concepts related to Ancient Civilisations. We then focused on various aspects of daily life, community life and governance in Ancient Egypt. Through class activities and research tasks students developed their knowledge of primary and secondary sources and their research skills. Prior to beginning the assessment task we had a sequence of lessons that focused on developing the behaviours, attitudes and skills required to work in teams effectively (such as: participating actively, listening attentively, making fair decisions, encouraging team members, resolving conflicts, etc.) This was integral as it ensured that students had an understanding of the behaviours, attitudes and skills required to work in teams productively and cooperatively. Prior to commencing the project the class developed ‘Guidelines for Effective Team Work’ that they all were required to adhere to. Describe the assessment task The assessment task involves students forming a team to research an aspect of Ancient Greece. The team is required to plan their own investigation and report their findings to the class in the form of an oral presentation and poster. Use of the assessment task – Which students? How? When? Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education The task is designed to develop team work, research, writing and oral presentation skills. I used this assessment task in a Year 7 Humanities class. I introduced it during our study of Ancient Civilizations at the beginning of Term 4. I therefore based my assessment criteria on progression points for 4.5. What did you find out about the students? Based on student performance I found out: o that students can work responsibly and effectively within teams with appropriate scaffolding o literacy skills are indelible to effective research o students need to be guided on how to prioritise their work load o students are far too kind when completing peer assessments What was the evidence? I used the following assessment tools/evidence to make an on balanced judgment of student learning: o teacher observation of team work o peer assessment of team work o student self reflection of team work o poster o oral presentation How did you assess your group against the standards at different levels? I created an Assessment Rubric for this task. The Rubric is built around the progression points for Interpersonal Development – Working in Teams and History – Historical Knowledge and Understanding & Historical Reasoning and Interpretation. The Assessment Rubric is broken up into specific skills. From the Domain Interpersonal Development and its Dimension Working in Teams, I developed 3 criteria: ‘behaviour and attitude’, ‘taking responsibility’ and ‘evaluation of team progress’. From the Domain History and its Dimensions Historical Knowledge and Understanding & Historical Reasoning and Interpretation, I developed 4 criteria: ‘research questions’, ‘research’, ‘synthesis of research’ and ‘historical knowledge and content’. These 7 criteria focus on the processes involved in making the final products and are more heavily weighted than the next 5 criteria. The 5 other criteria are ‘poster layout’, ‘spelling and grammar’, ‘eye contact’, ‘vocal skills’ and ‘presentation content and professionalism’. These criteria focus on the final products and are not based on progression points. Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education The expected level for my class was 4.5. The Rubric begins at level 4 (well below the expected level) and progresses up to level 5 (well above the expected level). The descriptors within the Rubric allow students to see what they are required to do to achieve a specific standard. What domains and dimensions are being covered? The domains and dimensions covered are: o Level 5 Interpersonal Development – Working in Teams o Level 5 History – Historical Knowledge and Understanding o Level 5 History –Historical Reasoning and Interpretation Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education Ancient Greece Team Project - Assessment Rubric Level of Well below expected Below expected Achievement level level At the expected level Above the expected level Well above the expected level Supported other team members to share information and explore the ideas of others. Employed strategies to cope with any team difficulties. Collected useful information for the team and completed set tasks on time. Mentored others to do the same. Reflected on and improved the strategies used by the team. Mentored others to do the same. Team independently developed appropriate and well thought out research questions that challenged the team. Gathered relevant information from a variety of sources. Able to identify gaps and evaluate the usefulness of resources. Bibliography includes 6 resources. Written in own words. Research questions are answered with great depth. Described in detail aspects of Ancient Greek society, compared them to other Ancient and Medieval societies and to the Behaviour and Attitude Usually worked cooperatively. Demonstrated an awareness of the factors that can cause team conflicts. Usually supportive and worked cooperatively. Demonstrated knowledge of negotiating skills to resolve any conflicts. Supportive and cooperative member of the team. Used negotiating skills to resolve any conflicts. Encouraged and mentored team members to achieve team goals. Used negotiating skills to resolve any conflicts Taking Responsibility Collected little information for the team and completed a few set tasks. Collected some information for the team and completed most of the set tasks on time. Collected useful information for the team and completed set tasks on time. Evaluation of Team Progress Demonstrated some understanding of criteria for evaluating team performance. Team relied mostly on teacher generated research questions. Demonstrated a good understanding of criteria for evaluating team performance. Team independently developed some appropriate research questions. Monitored the progress of the team against team performance criteria. Collected useful information for the team and completed set tasks on time. Encouraged others to do the same. Reflected on and improved the strategies used by the team. Team independently developed appropriate research questions. Team independently developed appropriate and well thought out research questions. Gathered some relevant information. Bibliography includes 1-2 resources. Gathered some relevant information. Bibliography includes 3 resources. Gathered relevant information from a variety of sources. Bibliography includes 4 resources. Gathered relevant information from a variety of sources. Able to identify gaps in resources. Bibliography includes 5 resources. Written in own words. Responses are limited. Written in own words. Research questions are answered with little depth. Described in detail aspects of Ancient Greek society. Written in own words. Research questions are answered with some depth. Described in detail aspects of Ancient Greek society and compared them to other Ancient societies. Written in own words. Research questions are answered with depth. Described in detail aspects of Ancient Greek society, compared them to other Ancient societies and to the present. Research Questions Research Synthesis of Research Historical Knowledge & Content Described some aspects of Ancient Greek society. Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007 www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/assessment/ Department of Education Level of Achievement Well below expected level Below expected level At the expected level Above the expected level present. Well above the expected level Marks (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Poster Layout Poster did not include two or more features (eg. heading, sub headings, border, relevant diagrams and labels). Poster did not include one feature (eg. heading, sub headings, border, relevant diagrams and labels). Poster was attractive. Included a heading, sub headings, border, relevant diagrams and labels. Spelling and Grammar Poster contained 3-4 spelling or grammatical errors. Poster contained 1-2 spelling or grammatical errors. Poster had no spelling or grammatical errors. Information was well expressed. Poster was very eyecatching. Included a bold heading, sub headings, border, relevant diagrams and labels. Poster had no spelling or grammatical errors. Information was well expressed and fluent. Eye Contact Student had little eye contact with audience and read from cue cards for most of the presentation. Student mumbled, had a low voice and mispronounced some words. Presentation lacked organisation and fell within 1-2 minutes. Presentation was lackluster and did not include visual aids. Student maintained eye contact most of the time and frequently returned to cue cards. Student had a low voice and mispronounced some words. Student maintained eye contact most of the time and sometimes returned to cue cards. Student had a clear voice and pronounced most words correctly. Student maintained eye contact with audience and occasionally returned to cue cards. Student had a clear voice and pronounced all words correctly. Poster was creative and original. Included a bold heading, sub headings, border, relevant diagrams and labels. Poster had no spelling or grammatical errors. Information was very well expressed and fluent. Demonstrated an excellent vocabulary. Student maintained eye contact with audience and rarely needed to return to cue cards. Student had a clear, strong voice and precise pronunciation. Presentation lacked organisation and fell within 2-3 minutes. Presentation did not engage the audience and visual aids added little to the presentation. Presentation was organised and fell within 3-4 minutes. Presentation was interesting and some visual aids were used. Presentation was well organized and fell within 45 minutes. Presentation was interesting and visual aids were appropriate. Presentation was well organized and fell within 45 minutes. Presentation was exciting/engaging and enhanced by visual aids. Vocal Skills Presentation Content and Professionalism Comments Last updated: 12.06.07 © State of Victoria, 2007