CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER 1. INTRODUCTION. This course lasts for ten lectures and aims to extend your knowledge of techniques such as NMR spectroscopy and to introduce techniques which you will not have encountered to date, such as EXAFS, X-ray crystallography and Electron spin resonance. There is not time to give an in depth treatment of any of the techniques, since each one could easily be the subject of a ten lecture course (or more!). Some background theory will be covered in each case to give an overview of how the technique works and what information it can give, followed by some examples from the literature to illustrate this. Most of the examples will be from a variety of areas of inorganic chemistry. Reading List: 1. 2nd year Identification and Analysis notes. 2. 3rd year spectroscopy notes. 3. “Structural Methods in Inorganic Chemistry” Cradock, E.A.V. Ebsworth and D.W. Rankin, Blackwell Scientific Publishers Ltd. 2nd Edition. 4. Other references to specific examples will be given at the appropriate point. So where are we coming from? Preparative chemistry is all about the reaction of known materials to give novel compounds. Why make novel compounds? a) new structural types give understanding of fundamentals of chemistry while also stimulating the development of..... b) new applications (or improvements on existing applications). So when a reaction is performed we obtain a series of products... A + B C ( + D + E......) The hope is for a single product in quantitative yield, but this is rarely the case! The initial action therefore is separation of the components by well known techniques, crystallisation, distillation (sublimation), chromatography etc. Next on the agenda is identification: knowledge of what the compounds are (structure) and it properties (reactivity). Having produced a compound from a reaction we need to ask a number of questions (in roughly the following order)... 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Does the material contain any known compounds which can be identified? Is the material pure? What is the elemental composition (empirical formula)/molecular weight (molecular formula). What functional groups are present? We know what went in - are the same functionalities present or have they been changed? How are the functional groups linked (connectivity) What is the molecular symmetry? What is the molecular geometry? What is the electronic structure? CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER There is an increasing degree of sophistication as we go down the list of questions. The first four questions can be asked of a mixture of compounds, but questions 5-8 are only meaningful when dealing with a pure compound. There is a whole battery of techniques available to the modern chemist to begin to answer these questions. (See handout 1) and these can also be graded in terms of degrees of sophistication. At the lowest end are fingerprint techniques. These are generally used to compare with known examples of related compounds and don’t give a complete characterisation of the compound. Examples with which you should be familiar include infra-red spectroscopy for organic compounds and UV-visible (electronic) spectroscopy for transition metal compounds. Next we need to determine composition using elemental analyses to establish an empirical formula, and techniques such as cryoscopy and/or mass spectrometry to give a value for the molecular mass of the compound. We can also use techniques such as IR and NMR to give information about functional groups present. Having determined the composition of the compound we ideally wish to know its structure as well. We can find information regarding symmetry from a number of techniques. For instance, the infra-red and Raman activity of various bands is related to molecular symmetry, while in NMR spectroscopy the equivalence of resonances also implies the presence of symmetry. X-ray crystallography also gives symmetry information – the way in which a compound crystallises reflects the symmetry within that molecule. CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER 2. NMR SPECTROSCOPY 2.1 Introduction You will be familiar with the basics of NMR spectroscopy and how to interpret spectra (2nd Year: 13 279 – Identification and Analysis). Dr Dunkin’s 3rd year course Interpretive Spectroscopy also gives extensive treatment of NMR spectroscopy. If you need to refresh your memory, the notes are available in PDF form from SPIDER. The aim in this course is to take your understanding of the technique further and to open up new applications. We will revise the basis of Fourier Transform methods, multipulse operation, multinuclear NMR, and in particular consider the information to be gained from quadrupolar nuclei, coupling, line widths and chemical shifts. 2.2 The Basis of Fourier Transform NMR 2.2.1 Nuclei in a magnetic Field. In order to be NMR active a nucleus must have a nuclear spin, I ≠ 0. Such a nucleus has a magnetic moment, , which can interact with an external magnetic field. Note that is a vector quantity, having both magnitude and direction. Normally these magnetic moment vectors are randomly orientated, but in a homogeneous magnetic field a torque is exerted on the magnetic moment, tending to align it perpendicular to the field, Bo. The result is that the magnetic moment rotates in a cone around the direction of the field. The motion is like that of a gyroscope and is generally referred to as precession, and specifically in this instance is known as Lamor precession (Figure 2.1). Bo Figure 2.1 Lamor Precession We have only referred so far to the effect on single magnetic moments. The resultant of an ensemble of magnetic moments is a random distribution of the magnetic moments around the field direction, Bo. This results in an overall magnetic moment, the Bo vector sum of all the magnetic moments, known as the magnetisation. The magnetisation in this case is along the direction of Bo, since all the components in the directions perpendicular to the field (x, y) mI = +1/2 cancel each other out. We can also include quantisation in this model, by allowing the cone angle to be determined by the quantum number mI, such that cosθ = mI / [I/(I+1)]½. So for an nucleus with I = ½, mI takes values of -½ and +½, giving two cones as shown (Figure 2.2, mI = -1/2 right). Figure 2.2 2.2.2 Pulses and Relaxation In order to observe an NMR spectrum the system must be perturbed from its equilibrium state. This is achieved by irradiating the nuclei with a short pulse of radiofrequency radiation, typically of length 1 – 50 s. The length of the pulse, p, is dependent on the field and the magnetogyric ratio of the nucleus, and pulse lengths of (/2)B (referred to as a 90º pulse) and of length B (referred to as a 180º pulse) are most commonly used. z A 180º pulse results in a net magnetisation M in the opposite direction – ie the populations of the energy levels characterised by mI = ½ and mI = - ½ are inverted. Restoration to the equilibrium state is achieved by a process called spin-lattice relaxation characterised by a relaxation time T1. A 90º pulse is used to observe a standard NMR spectrum. It results in a net Bo Figure 2.3 90º Pulse mI = +1/2 My mI = -1/2 CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER magnetisation in the y-direction, My (Figure 2.3), which arises from a “bunching” of the magnetic moments of the nuclear spins. Most of the spins remain randomly distributed around the precession cones, but a small number bunch together – this is more properly termed phase coherence. The 90º pulse is followed by a relaxation to equilibrium, known as transverse relaxation, which is exponential in nature. The magnetisation in the y-direction at time t (My(t)) is given by the following equation: My(t) = My(0) exp (–t / T1) 2.2.3 The FID and its Fourier Transform The decay is accompanied by an emission of energy which is detected in the receiver coils of the spectrometer. The plot of this signal intensity with time is known as the Free Induction Decay or FID. If all the spins being measured are identical and the energy of the radiofrequency pulse (carrier frequency) is coincident with the energy separating the mI = ½ and – ½ states then a simple exponential decay will be observed. In practice, the carrier frequency is generally off resonance, resulting in a sinusoidal modulation, shown schematically in figure 2.4. The FID contains all the information of a conventional spectrum and it was shown in 1966 that Fourier transformation of an FID indeed does give a spectrum with lines corresponding to the different frequencies represented in the FID. The Fourier transform takes the FID which is in the time domain and converts to it frequency domain equivalent. It is a mathematically simple process, but tedious. It is readily computerised and is routinely used in modern NMR spectrometers. If more than one spin environment is present in the sample the FID is further complicated by the superimposition of the different resonances, giving a complex interferogram (Figure 2.5). Figure 2.5. Left, FID and corresponding Fourier transform. Above, FID for 1H NMR of cholesterol. CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER 2.2.4 Multi-pulse Operation The major advantage of Fourier Transform (FT) NMR is multi-pulse operation. Since the information recorded is digitised multiple scans can be performed and the FIDs summed. The pulse sequence is summarised in the schematic below: The radiofrequency pulse is followed by a short delay after which the FID is acquired. Finally, a second, much longer delay (it should be approximately 10 times T2) allows the system to fully relax to equilibrium before the next pulse is initiated. This prevents saturation of the excited state, which leads to a loss of signal intensity. The result of multi-pulse operation is an improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio. Essentially, the genuine signal due to the resonance of the sample is ever present and is reinforced, while the random noise arising from various sources (mostly instrumental) is gradually cancelled out. Doubling the number of scans improves the signal to noise ratio by a factor of 2, allowing the measurement of dilute samples and samples of nuclei with low natural abundances. 2.3 NMR of Nuclei other than 1H and 13C: 2.3.1 The Spin-½ Nuclei. A very significant number of the elements have one or more NMR active nuclei. Most NMR texts list these nuclei, along with some of their properties. An extract from such a table for some of the more commonly studied I = ½ nuclei is given below… Isotope 1H 13C 15N 19F 29Si 31P 77Se 103Rh 109Ag 119Sn 183W 195Pt 205Tl 207Pb Natural Abundance, C (%) 99.985 1.108 0.37 100 4.70 100 7.58 100 48.18 8.58 14.40 33.8 70.5 22.6 Magnetic Moment, /N 4.83724 1.2166 -0.4903 4.5532 -0.96174 1.9601 0.925 -0.153 -0.2260 -1.8119 0.2025 1.043 2.8187 1.002 Magnetogyric Ratio / 107 rad T-1 s-1 26.7520 6.7283 -2.712 25.181 -5.3188 10.841 5.12 -0.846 -1.250 -10.021 1.120 5.768 15.589 5.540 NMR Frequency / MHz 100.000 000 25.145 004 10.136 783 94.094 003 19.867 184 40.480 737 19.071 523 3.172 310 4.653 623 37.290 662 4.161 733 21.414 376 57.633 833 20.920 597 Standard Dp Dc SiMe4 SiMe4 MeNO2 or NO3CCl3F SiMe4 85% H3PO4 SeMe2 mer-[RhCl3(SMe2)3] Ag+(aq) SnMe4 WF6 [Pt(CN)6]2TlNO3 (aq) PbMe4 1.000 1.76 10-4 3.85 10-6 0.834 3.69 10-4 0.0665 5.3 10-4 3.16 10-5 4.92 10-5 4.51 10-3 1.06 10-5 3.39 10-3 0.140 2.01 10-3 5.670 103 1.000 2.19 10-2 4.73 103 2.10 3.77 10-2 3.01 0.179 0.279 25.6 5.99 10-2 19.2 7.91 102 11.4 The magnetic moment and magnetogyric ratio are intrinsic properties of each nucleus, while the NMR frequency, , is dependent on the magnitude of the applied field, B, and the magnetogyric ratio, , as given by: = ( / 2) B Thus there is a linear relationship between field strength and the resonant f requency. CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER The standard (or reference) chosen for a nucleus should satisfy a number of criteria. It should i) contain only one chemical environment of the nucleus to be studied so that its NMR spectrum contains a single sharp line; ii) give an intense signal for only a small amount of compound; iii) give a resonance in a region of the spectrum away from the signals of most common chemicals; and iv) where possible be stable and chemically inert. The last two columns are the relative receptivities, the sensitivity of a nucleus relative to the 1 H (DP) and 13C (DC) nuclei. The maximum peak height of a resonance is given by the following equation: Smax | 3 Bo2 N (T2 / T T1) | where is the magnetogyric ratio, Bo is the applied field, N is the number of nuclei present, T1 and T2 are the relaxation times and T is the temperature in Kelvin. T1 and T2 are approximately equal for a non-viscous fluid, while Bo and T are essentially constant in the NMR experiment. The equation therefore reduces to: Smax | 3 N | which can be written as: Smax = C | 3 N| The constant, C, can be set using the parameters for the 1H nucleus such that Smax = 1 and then used to give relative values for other nuclei. The number of nuclei, N, is dependent on concentration (which is assumed to be constant) and on the isotopic abundance of the nucleus in question. Thus, for the 1H nucleus: Smax = C (26.7520)3 0.99985 If Smax = 1 then C = 5.224 10-5. Then consider another nucleus, namely 119Sn. The receptivity relative to the proton, DP, may then be calculated using the value obtained for the constant C and the values of and isotopic natural abundance in the table: DP = 5.224 10-5 (10.021)3 0.0858 = 4.51 10-3 Compare the value obtained here with that given in the table above. A similar strategy will also yield values of DC, the receptivity relative to the 13C nucleus. The value of the multipulse operation possible on a Fourier transform spectrometer now becomes apparent, with most nuclei being very significantly less sensitive than the proton. The spin-½ nuclei tend to give sharp resonances. The width of a line is described as the line width at half the height of the line, 1/2, and is given by: CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER 1/2 = 1 / T2 Hz The line width will typically be of the order of a few Hz or less unless chemical exchange between equivalent sites is taking place. The corollary of the narrow linewidths can be very long relaxation times. Thus 109Ag nuclei in silver complexes can have relaxation times of over 100 seconds. This can be a problem in the measurement of the NMR spectrum, since it is necessary to put in a delay of 10 T2 in order to allow equlibration of the spin states prior to the next pulse. This problem can be overcome by adding a chemically inert paramagnetic ion, known as a relaxation agent. The paramagnetism of the compound encourages rapid relaxation via interaction with the unpaired electron spin. The most commonly used relaxation agent is the complex [Cr(acac)3] (acac = acetylacetonate). 2.3.2 The Quadrupolar Nuclei. Quadrupolar nuclei are those which have a nuclear spin, I > ½. At the simplest level they differ from spin-½ nuclei in the distribution of the charge within the nucleus. Spin-½ nuclei have a spherical distribution of charge in the nucleus, whereas quadrupolar nuclei have a nonspherical distribution of electric charge in the nucleus. Consequently their properties are quite different. The sensitivity of the nuclei, for instance, are now also dependent on the nuclear spin of the nucleus, IX, as given by: Smax | 3 N | IX(IX + 1) Again, values relative to the 1H and 13C nuclei (DP and DC) can be calculated. Linewidths are also very significantly influenced by the quadrupolar nature of the nucleus. We define a linewidth factor, ℓ, where ℓ = Q2(2I + 3) / [I2(2I-1)] and Q is the nuclear quadrupole moment and I is the nuclear spin. Both I and Q are intrinsic properties of the nucleus and the linewidth factor gives a direct comparison of the likely linewidths of a resonance, all other things being equal (which of course they rarely are!) and thus an indication of the likely suitability of a nucleus for NMR study). The linewidth is similar to that for spin-½ nuclei, only it is now inversely proportional to the quadrupolar relaxation time, TQ: ½ = 1 / TQ This expression may be expanded as follows: 3 2 I 3 e 2 q Q 10 I 2 (2 I 1) zz 2 c where I = nuclear spin, e = unit charge, qzz = electric field gradient, Q = nuclear quadrupole moment and c is the correlation time, given by: CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER c = V / 6kT where = viscosity and V = molecular volume. There are three main terms which need to be minimised in order to obtain reasonable linewidths in quadrupolar nuclei, namely: the linewidth factor, the electric field gradient and the correlation time. The linewidth factor is dependent only on the intrinsic nuclear properties and so is unaffected by chemical or experimental parameters. Some quadrupolar nuclei are simply better than others for NMR observation. The electric field gradient is dependent on the symmetry around the nucleus being studied. Cubic symmetry (either tetrahedral or octahedral geometry) gives zero electric field gradient – although small local variations in symmetry mean that the linewidth is never zero. (See examples later on). So choice of chemical system can very considerably influence the ability to observe an NMR resonancefor a given nucleus. The correlation time is dependent on experimental conditions, primarily the viscosity and the temperature. It is a measure of molecular tumbling (and thus averaging of nuclear anisotropy) in the magnetic field. The correlation time is approximately the time required for the molecule to turn through 1 radian. Bigger molecules tumble less rapidly, while higher viscosity also results in slower tumbling. Finally temperature also plays a part, since molecules possess higher rotational energy at higher temperatures. So, the ideal situation is to choose a nucleus with a small quadrupole moment in a small molecular compound with the highest possible symmetry at high dilution and elevated temperatures! Despite these apparently stringent conditions, it is often possible to make sufficient compromises to enable spectra to be observed even for quite unfavourable nuclei. 2.3.3 Chemical Shifts It was discovered early in the history of NMR spectroscopy that the exact frequency at which a given nucleus resonates is dependent on the chemical environment. While the proton chemical shift range is fairly restricted (-30 to +20 ppm) in normal circumstances other elements, and particularly the metallic elements are able to give very large chemical shift ranges. For instance 59Co has a chemical shift range of some 18000 ppm. Let us examine the reasons for this. Chemical shifts arise from local variations in the field in the vicinity of the nucleus being studied: Bx = Bo (1 - ) where is the shielding parameter, which in turn may be expressed as: = d + p where d is a diamagnetic contribution to the shielding, arising from electrons in closed shells, and p is a paramagnetic contribution arising from the presence of unpaired electrons. In the majority of organic, s-block and upper p-block compounds the paramagetic term is negligible. However, in compounds which have low energy paramagnetic excited states (eg in CH407/CH507 INTERPRETATIVE SPECTROSCOPY Dr M.D. SPICER the transition metals and lower p-block metals) the paramagnetic term can become very large and dominate the shielding of the nucleus. In the case of 59Co NMR this is well documented and an expression for the paramagnetic term has been derived: 32 B r 3 p E where B is the Bohr magneton, <r-3> is a measure of the mean distance of an electron in the metal p-orbital from the nucleus, is the nephelauxitic parameter (a measure of covalency) and E is the d-orbital splitting, or more properly, the energy of the lowest energy electronic transition. The smaller the value of E, the higher the level of occupation of the first excited state (cf Boltzmann distribution), hence the greater the value of p and thus the greater the chemical shift. The magnitude of E depends very strongly on the ligand donor set around the metal centre (remember the spectrochemical series) and so the chemical shift correlates well with the donor set and can be diagnostic of the coordination environment of the metal.