WRITING FRAME To what extent was the Scottish Reformation in 1560 a radical break with the past? Change Continuity Scotland was a Protestant country A lack of leadership from the Catholic hierarchy meant that the old faith put up little resistance to the reformers – the Archbishop of Glasgow fled to France, and three bishops joined the Protestants Scotland had a Catholic queen The First Book of Discipline was never officially approved At this early stage nothing was done to endow the new Protestant Church or disendow the old Catholic Church A practical difficulty was the possession of most monastic lands and revenues by the nobility Some Catholics remained firm to their faith and maintained their beliefs The destruction of religious houses was not in most cases due to the Protestant reformers but mainly due to English military operations, neglect in the preReformation period and indifference in the postReformation period It was not practical to dispossess Catholic clergy of their benefices and they were allowed to retain two-thirds of their revenues for life Monks and friars were allotted pensions and allowed to utilise their quarters for life Change or Continuity? This list of points can be edited and points can be pasted under change and/or continuity The policy of the Protestants was to purge churches of all signs of idolatry but it was their intention to preserve and utilise existing buildings; while Catholic ornaments were destroyed or sold, the proceeds of such activities were frequently used to repair churches or aid the poor. THE AGE OF THE REFORMATION, 1542–1603 (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 1 WRITING FRAME The reformers’ ambitious plans for the provision of educational facilities were delayed when the funds that they had earmarked for education fell into other hands. The reformers’ plans to provide for the poor were thwarted by vested interests. The First Book of Discipline said little of any body comparable to a General Assembly; Knox and his supporters would have accepted a ‘Godly prince’ as head of the church had it not been for the impracticality of having a Catholic queen as head of the church in Scotland. Any other relevant factors? 2 THE AGE OF THE REFORMATION, 1542–1603 (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 WRITING FRAME How far was the death of Mary of Guise the main reason for the success of the Protestant Reformation in Scotland? Mary of Guise’s death Other factors Her unexpected death in June 1560, created a ‘political vacuum’ and thus an opportunity for the Protestants to take control English intervention – English sent a fleet to the Forth – aim to cut French supply lines. Army sent into south east Scotland, spring 1560 Mary of Guise’s death or other factors? This list of points can be edited and points can be pasted under Mary of Guise’s death and/or other factors She was regent of Scotland from 1554, during which time she promoted a pro-French and pro-Catholic policy. She was an extremely able ruler who gover ned and looked after Scotland for her absent daughter. She had managed to win many Scots over, partly through lavish gifts. Mary of Guise had maintained French troops in Scotland. Despite a Protestant rebellion she was regaining control prior to her death. The Reformation was by no means a certainty when Mary of Guise died. The Catholic Church’s failure to reform itself: it failed to deal sufficiently with the challenge from Protestant ideas. It failed to deal with pluralism and other corruptions in the system. Increased confidence amongst Protestant Scots after 1558 due to a number of factors: Protestant Queen in England; Knox returned, and preached in Perth; Perth and Dundee declared as Protestant towns; increasing numbers of nobles now prepared to show their true allegiances; Lords of the Congregation took up arms. The Protestants were organised and able to take advantage of the situation. There was no leadership from the Catholic Church – the Archbishop of Glasgow fled to France. Three bishops joined the Protestants. The Treaty of Edinburgh removed French and English troops from Scotland and the Reformation Parliament declared Scotland to have accepted the reformed faith. Any other relevant factors? THE AGE OF THE REFORMATION, 1542–1603 (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 3 WRITING FRAME To what extent were the efforts of the reformers res ponsible for the success of the Protestant Reformation in 1560? Reformers’ efforts Other factors The Protestants were organised and able to take advantage of the situation The Catholic Church’s failure to reform itself: it failed to deal sufficiently with the challenge from Protestant ideas. It failed to deal with pluralism and other corruptions in the system Reformers’ efforts or other factors? This list of points can be edited and points can be pasted under reformers’ efforts and/or other factors Mary of Guise was Regent of Scotland from 1554, during which time she promoted a pro-French and pro-Catholic policy that was unpopular with many Scots. Despite a Protestant rebellion Mary of Guise was regaining control prior to her death; her death in June 1560 created a ‘political vacuum’ and an opportunity for the Protestants to seize control. English intervention: the English sent a fleet to the Forth – aim to cut French supply lines. Army sent into south-east Scotland, spring 1560. Increased confidence amongst Protestant Scots after 1558 due to a number of factors: a Protestant Queen in England; Knox returned, and preached in Perth; Perth and Dundee declared as Protestant towns; increasing numbers of nobles now prepared to show their true allegiances; Lord s of the Congregation took up arms. The Treaty of Edinburgh removed French and English troops from Scotland and the Reformation Parliament declared Scotland to have accepted the Reformed or Protestant faith. There was no leadership from the Catholic Church – the Archbishop of Glasgow fled to France. Three bishops joined the Protestants. Any other relevant factors? 4 THE AGE OF THE REFORMATION, 1542–1603 (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 WRITING FRAME To what extent was Mary, Queen of Scots responsible for the loss of her throne? Mary’s actions Other factors Mary’s poor choice of husbands alienated many of her nobles Mary pardoned Riccio’s murderers, perhaps knowing that they might join a conspiracy against her husband, Darnley The birth of a male heir to the throne revived the old issue of a male heir who could be manipulated by discontented nobles Riccio’s murder stemmed largely from Darnley’s jealousy caused by the birth of a son who was a potential alternative monarch Mary’s actions or other factors? This list of points can be edited and points can be pasted under Mary’s actions and/or other factors Mary was believed to have had a poor record of attending her Council meetings. Mary isolated herself from her nobles and surrounded herself with French servants. Mary suffered from depression on a number of occasions, leaving a power vacuum. Mary’s marriage to Darnley resulted in the Chase-About Raid which, although an unsuccessful rebellion, lost her the support of the Earl of Moray, her half-brother. Darnley proved to be an unsuitable character who demanded the crown matrimonial. Darnley’s murder at Kirk o’ Field was a crime that was reported throughout Europe and the main suspect was the Earl of Bothwell, who was protected by his friendship with the queen. Mary failed to mourn Darnley and very soon after married Bothwell. Bothwell was not a popular choice for a husband, and Mary’s Protestant wedding alienated many Catholics in Scotland and England. Mary’s half-brother, the Earl of Moray, forced her to abdicate; he had her imprisoned in Loch Leven Castle and her son was declared King, w ith Moray as regent. Any other relevant factors? THE AGE OF THE REFORMATION, 1542–1603 (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 5 WRITING FRAME How successful was James VI in his efforts to alter the Kirk by 1603? Successes Obstacles Increasingly, James would have the General Assemblies meeting in the north east where he could rely on more support for the crown New Presbyterian movement in the Kirk referred to as ‘Melvillians’ – conflict had already developed during Morton’s regency Extent of James VI’s success in his efforts to alter the Protestant Church by 1603? This list of points can be edited and points can be pasted under successes and/or obstacles. Second Book of Discipline was seen as a challenge to royal authority. ‘Black Acts’ (1584) subjected the Kirk to authority of the crown – ministers are asked to subscribe and a number go int o exile, including Andrew Melville. 1592 – ‘Golden Acts’ reaffirmed the privileges of the Kirk, General Assembly and Presbyteries, but the General Assembly could only meet with the consent of the king. After Huntly’s surrender in 1594 James VI no longer ne eded support from the Presbyterian faction. In 1596 Melville famously reminded James VI that he was but ‘God’s silly (ie simple) vassal’. A religious riot in December 1596 forced James VI to flee from Edinburgh but the radical insurrection collapsed without backing from the nobility. In 1597 Melville was deposed as rector of St Andrews. In 1600 James appointed Bishops to Parliament. He had clearly gone far in his attempts to control the Kirk and thus help to control the state. Any other relevant factors? 6 THE AGE OF THE REFORMATION, 1542–1603 (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009