The English School: - School of Politics and International Studies

advertisement
The English School:
a Bibliographical Supplement on
International Law, Regime Theory, Constructivism
Version of 27 August 2002
Barry Buzan
International Law and International Relations
1. Abbott, Kenneth W. (1989) 'Modern International Relations
Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers' Yale Journal of
International Law, 14: 335-411.
2. Abbott, Kenneth W. (1992) ‘International law and itnernational
relations theory: building bridges - elements of a joint discipline’.
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 86, 167172.
3. Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik,
Anne-Marie Slaughter, Duncan Snidal (2000) 'The Concept of
Legalization', International Organization, 54:3, 401-19.
4. Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan Snidal (2000) 'Hard and Soft Law
in International Governance', International Organization, 54:3, 42156.
5. Beck, Robert J. (1996) ‘International law and international
relations: the prospects of interdisciponary collaboration’, in: Beck
et al., 3-33.
6. Beck, Robert J., Anthony Clark Arend, and Robert D. Vander Lugt
(eds.) (1996) International Rules. Approaches from International
Law and International Relations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
7. Byers, Michael (1999) Custom, Power and the Power of Rules.
8. Cassese, Antonio, (1986) International Law in a Divided World,
Oxford, Clarendon Press.
9. Coplin, William (1965) ‘International law and assumptions about
the state system’, World Politics 17, 615-634.
10.Cutler, A. Claire (1999) ‘Public meets private: the international
unification and harmonisation of private international trade law’,
Global Society 13:1, 25-48
11.Culter, Claire (2001) ‘Critical reflections on the Westphalian
assumptions of international law and organization: a crisis of
legitimacy?’, Review of International Studies, 27:2, 133-50.
12.Fox, Gregory H. and Brad R. Roth, 'Democracy and International
Law', Review of International Studies, 27:3 (2001) 327-52.
13.Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, Anne-Marie
Slaughter (2000) 'Introduction: Legalization and World Politics',
International Organization, 54:3, 385-99.
14.Greenwood, Christopher 'International law and the "war against
terrorism"', International Affairs, 78:2, 301-17.
15.Hsiung, J.C. (1996) Anarchy and Order: The Interplay of Politics
and Law in International Relations.
16.Keohane, Robert O., (1997) ‘International relations and
international law: two optics’, Harvard International Law Journal
38, 487-502
17.Ku, Charlotte et al. (2001) ‘Exploring International Law:
Opportunities and Challenges for Political Science Research: A
Roundtable’, International Studies Review, 3:1, 3-23
18.Simpson, Gerry (2000) 'The Situation on the International Legal
Theory Front: The Power of Rules and the Rule of Power',
European Journal of International Law, 11:2, 439-64.
19.Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1993) ‘International law and international
relations theory: a dual agenda’, American Journal of International
Law 87, 205-239.
20.Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Andrew S. Tulumello, Stepan Wood,
(1998) ‘International law and international relations theory: a new
generation of interdisciplinary scholarship’, American Journal of
International Law 92, 367-397.
Regime Theory
1. Arts, Bas (2000) ‘Regimes, Non-State Actors and the State System:
A “Structurational” Regime Model’, European Journal of
International Relations, 6:4, 513-42.
2. Cortell, Andrew P. and James W. Davis Jr. (2000) ‘Understanding
the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda’,
International Studies Review, 2:1, 65-87.
3. Evans, Tony and Peter Wilson, (1992) ‘Regime Theory and the
English School of International Relations’, Millennium, 21:3.
4. Goertz, Gary and Paul F. Diehl, (1992) ‘Toward a Theory of
International Norms’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36:4.
5. Gourevitch, Peter, (1978) 'The International System and Regime
Formation: A Critical Review of Anderson and Wallerstein,
Comparative Politics, 10:3, pp. 419-38.
6. Haggard, Stephen and Beth Simmons (1987) ‘Theories of
International Regimes’, International Organization 41:3.
7. Hansenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, Volker Rittberger, (1996)
‘Interests, Power, Knowledge: The Study of International
Regimes’, Mershon International Studies Review, 40:2, 177-228.
8. Hasenclever, Andres, Peter Mayer, Volker Rittberger, (1997)
Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
9. Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer and Volker Rittberger (2000)
‘Integrating theories of international regimes’, Review of
International Studies, 26:1, 3-33.
10.Hurrell, Andrew (1993) ‘International society and the study of
regimes: a reflective approach’, in Volker Rittberger, (ed.) Regime
Theory and International Relations. Oxford, Oxford University
Press. 49-72.
11.Jervis, Robert, (1982) 'Security Regimes', International
Organization, 36:2
12.Keohane, Robert O. (1988) 'International Institutions: Two
Approaches', International Studies Quarterly, 32:4, 379-96.
13.Krasner, Stephen (ed), (1983) International Regimes, , a reprint of
International Organization, 36:2 (1982).
14.Kratochwil, Friedrich, and John Ruggie, (1986) ‘International
organization: a state of the art or an art of the state?’ International
Organization, 40:4, 753-75.
15.Levy, Marc, Oran Young and Michael Zürn, (1995) ‘The Study of
International Regimes’, European Journal of International
Relations,1:3, 267-330.
16.Rittberger, Volker (ed.), (1991) Beyond Anarchy: International
Cooperation and Regimes, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
17.Rittberger, Volker (ed.) (1993) Regime Theory and International
Relations,; and see review of this by Andreas Behnke, ‘Ten Years
After: The State of the Art of Regime Theory’, Cooperation and
Conflict, 30:2 (1995) 179-97.
18.Ruggie, John Gerrard, (1982) ‘International Regimes,
Transactions, and Change: embedded libralism in the postwar
economic order’, International Organization, 36:2, 379-415.
19.Russett, Bruce, (1967) International Regimes and the International
System.
20.Underdahl, Arild, (1995) ‘The Study of International Regimes’,
Journal of Peace Research 32:1.
21.Zacher, Mark, (1990) 'Toward a Theory of International Regimes',
Journal of International Affairs, 44:1.
22.Zacher, Mark W., and Brent A. Sutton, (1995) Governing Global
Networks: International Regimes for Transportation and
Communication, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Constructivism
1. Adler, Emanuel (1997) ‘Seizing the Middle Ground:
Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of
International Relations, 3:3, 319-63.
2. Adler, Emanuel (forthcoming), ‘Constructivism in International
Relations: Sources, Contributions, Debates, and Future Directions’
in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons (eds.)
Handbook of International Relations, Sage, ch. 5.
3. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde, (1998) Security: A
New Framework for Analysis, Boulder CO., Lynne Rienner.
4. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1997) ‘International Norms and Domestic
Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide’, European
Journal of International Relations, 3:4, 473-95.
5. Checkel, Jeffrey (1998) ‘The constructivist turn in international
relations theory’, World Politics 50:1, 324-348.
6. Copeland, Dale C. (2000) ‘The Constructivist Challenge to
Structural Realism: A Review Essay’ (of Wendt), International
Security, 25:2, 187-212.
7. Guzzini, Stefano (2000) ‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism in
International Relations’, European Journal of International
Relations, 6:2, 147-82.
8. Hopf, Ted, (1998) ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International
Relations Theory’, International Security, 23:1, 171-200.
9. Katzenstein, Peter, (ed.), (1996) The Culture of National Security:
Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York, Columbia UP.
10.Kratochwil, Friedrich (2000) ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy?
Wendt’s “Social Theory of International Politics” and the
Constructivist Challenge’, Millennium, 29:1, 1-25.
11.Kubalkova, Vendulka, Nicholas Onuf and Paul Kowert (1998)
International Relations in a Constructed World, New York, M.E.
Sharpe.
12.Onuf, Nicholas (1989) World of Our Own Making, Columbia,
University of South Carolina Press.
13.Palan, Ronan (2000) ‘A world of their making: an evaluation of the
constructivist critique in international relations’ , Review of
International Studies, 26:4, 575- 98.
14.Price, Richard, and Christian Reus-Smit (1998) ‘Dangerous
Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’,
European Journal of International Relations, 4:3, 259-94.
15.Ruggie, John, (1998) Constructing the World Polity, London,
Routledge, esp. Intro.
16.Ruggie, John Gerard (1998) ‘What Makes the World Hang
Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist
Challenge’, International Organization, 52:4, 887-917.
17.Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (2000) ‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of
a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism
Compared’, International Studies Quarterly, 44:1, 97-119.
18.Wendt, Alexander, (1992), ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: the
social construction of power politics’, International Organization,
46:2, 391-425.
19.Wendt, Alexander (1996) ‘Identity and Structural Change in
International Politics’, in Yosef Lapid and Friedrich Kratochwil
(eds.)., The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, Boulder
CO., Lynne Rienner, 47-64.
20.Wendt, Alexander, (1995), ‘Constructing International Politics’,
International Security, 19, 71-81.
21.Wendt, Alexander (1998) Social Theory of International Politics,
New York, Cambridge UP.
22.‘Forum on Alexander Wendt’, Review of International Studies,
26:1, 123-80.
Download