CONTEXT IN SUPERVISION IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXTUAL FACTORS Gordana Mićović, 2007. CONTEXT IS A MANIFESTATION OF THE FIELD THE FIELD IS UNDIFFERENTIATED, THE SUB-FIELDS/SUB-CONTEXTS DIFFERENTIATE FROM IT For example: I am an event in the field, so I am a sub-field, a field in the hierarchy of other fields. THE FIELD IS CONSTANTLY CREATED AND RE-CREATED- family field, work organization field, therapeutic context, supervisory context… WE MEET ONLY THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE FIELD THE FIELD IS ORGANISED, the organization gives a meaning in the certain context, in other words the meaning depends on the position of the elements in the field (this space is organized as a classroom…the whole event of our encounter is determined by our task or plan) A FIGURAL ELEMENT WILL DETERMINE OUR ACTIVITY We, as therapist or supervisors, are responsible for the continuous awareness of the figure/ground formation and destruction. The figure formation - a possibility that the potentially relevant (the ID) transforms into an event – a activity, so the potentially relevant becomes obvious. We are with those information that are figural.. Regarding some information we have to accept some limitations. Only those information that are received and accepted become a part of the field. It liberate us from judgments, criticism, harshness. The judgmental and critical position breaks the field and doesn’t take into account the field complexity and our limitations, because the field is what it is, and the truth as a total experience is not attainable. ACTUALITY, THE PRESENT – TIMING The present event can be explained only in relation to the constellation of the current influences existing in the field. Influenced by past events the certain elements of the field always become figural… together with client we confirm the clues that enable us to understand the client/supervisee and how he/she chooses elements of the field and creates significant events for himself/herself. (For example: specific way of the field organization…narcissistic…diagnostic clues…as elements of the supervisory process) UNIQUENESS 1 Each situation is unique. This uniqueness reminds us that there is a novelty in the field, adds freshness to things that happened so many times in the similar, but not the same situations. The same event can never happen again. (Freshness of our presentation or what is the novelty in the relation to others) PRINCIPLE OF RELEVANCY EVERYTHING IN THE FIELD IS EQUALLY VALID, all of us are potentially valid and somebody will become a figure. PURPOSEFULNESS – a purpose- an aim present in the field Phenomenology, Field theory and Constructivism make a foundation of integrative relational approach to psychotherapeutic theory and practice Field theory includes a holistic understanding of man who is in interaction with the environment, social world, organizations and cultural milleu. Everything is mutually connected and any change in one part influences all other parts of the field. Phenomena are in interconnected relationship and in a complex process. This is the reason why the client’s illness is not pathologized but perceived in context. Therapist or supervisor must not be interested only in one event but the whole physical, emotional, social and cultural context in which the event took place. Field theory and particularly multicausality minimize the generalization of causes and enables the psychotherapist to take into consideration the client’s whole situation and see how it differs from his/her own. Both field theory and constructivism are potentially liberating concepts that guide the therapists to be aware of all factors that are relevant for a certain client, rather than supposing their relevancy (Parlett,1993). 2 PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHOTHERAPY PROVIDES A SAFE CONTEXT IN WHICH THE CLIENTS CAN CONFIRM VALIDITY OF THE MEANING GIVEN TO THEIR PAST. THERAPIST participant – observer CLIENT Client in the process of contacting the environment -support system -contact functions -cycle of experience -defence mechanisms -self functions -unfinished businesses -polarities Client in the relationship with the therapist -transference -countertransference Client viewed through the field aspects -significant current events -significant historical events in family -relationships in the past -influence of culture OBJECTIVE: Dialogical-interpersonal relationship – genuine meeting Dialectical-intrapsychic – mutual exploration of the client’s inner world 3 SUPERVISION Hyckner (1993) claims that both supervisor and supervisee form a totality that provides a context for individual experience. SUPERVISOR participant-observer SUPERVISEE therapist Co-creation Reflection Supervisee in the process of contacting the client - contract(s) - treatment strategies - specific interventions - ethical issues - diagnostic issues Supervisee in the relationship with the supervisor - transference - counter transference - relational unconscious - parallel process Supervisee viewed through the field aspects - significant current events - influence of culture - ethnicity, race, social status - training programme, training in supervision OBJECTIVES: to help the therapist to plan the therapy, to develop inclusion and multiperspectival view of reality, to attain meta-perspective… Ultimate goal is a welfare of the client. HAWKINS & SHOHET Minimum 4 elements in supervision Supervisor, supervisee, client, work context Only the supervisor and supervisee are directly present Client and work context are brought in the supervisory session, via the conscious and the unconscious of the supervisee (client may be present in the form of audiovisual record) 4 In the background of the client and therapist or supervisor and supervisee there are their ethnicity, race, cultural milleu, relationships to the others’ differences. For example, some clients seek a therapist of the same race and culture. A COMPETENT SUPERVISOR SHOULD HAVE A SENSITIVITY FOR THE WIDER CONTEXT. HIS SENSITIVITY INFLUENCES THE SUPERVISORY PROCESS. WHY? BECAUSE THE SUPERVISOR IS indivisible part of the context in which he works. He is both an observer of and a participant in the supervisory process and in that way he co-creates the meaning. The meaning of some event is understood from the perspective of a subject who experiences it through certain context. In the course of the supervision there is a process of two people who have two different subjective experiential worlds, who share their own different perspectives, negotiate on shared meaning, who respect differences in the other’s frame of reference, culture, personal life, gender, social status, ethnicity. It is very important to know these elements of the context and their influence, because they, in the therapeutic and supervisory context, support the therapist/supervisor to create an intervention in the certain moment. SUPERVISION – CO-CREATION AND NEGOTIATION ON MEANING CREATED BETWEEN THE SUPERVISOR AND THERAPIST. IT FACILITATES THE SIMILAR PROCESS BETWEEN THE PSYCHOTHERAPIST AND CLIENT. SUPERVISOR should carefully attend the conscious and unconscious therapist’s/client’s communication in order to be able to attain meta-perspective on psychotherapeutic alliance and context in which he/she operates. Muller B. (1997) believes that a concept of “total therapeutic context” is a core of theory and practice of Gestalt therapy. Muller B. (1997) Concentration on the individual and uniqueness represents for a gestalt therapist only one side of the coin. The other side is attention that should be paid to total social and political situation linked with development. As therapist we are turned toward an individual, searching for creative solutions, but still we are connected to social conditions and ideologies, not only personally but through the client’s adopted values, hopes and anxiety. Our perspective should involve covert and overt dangers originated from “crazy” people and structures that leads the whole society. SUPERVISOR – SUPERVISEE They create an interactive field bringing in it their own experiences that make a part of the certain context, in the continuous flow of mutual reciprocal influence (Storolow). Psychotherapy or supervision cannot be free of context. Contextual factors may be very clear and obvious (skin colour, gender…setting in our therapy room) or more complex (supervision in England as a part of European union) or hardly visible. All of them must be taken into consideration when working with the supervisee. 5 Contextual factors influence the nature and quality of the supervisory relationship as well as a choice of work focus. Our attention depends on the individual’s needs that organize the field. Context refers to the supervisee’s or supervisor’s present, past and future that in turn are affected by supervision, because in the field everything is connected with everything else. In order to understand the client or supervisee we need to understand all relevant factors of the total field or whole context (interdependence of an individual and the environment that may be internal /sensations, thoughts, feelings, hopes or dreams/ and external /other people, plants, animals, inanimate world/). Lewin (1952) claims that any change in the field influences the whole, so we cannot find any event that is a simple consequence of the previous event. There is a multicasual explanation . Zinker, 1994. Phenomenological approach requires a developed awareness of the relevant factors for a specific client. Of course there is not an assumption of the factors that will be relevant. The whole field or context or “total gestalt” requires to be explained in the multicasual manner. The client’s/supervisee’s progress is a function of the total field. It is not determined only by client’s/supervisee’s strength and motivation, but the therapist’s/supervisor’s skills, their relationship and FACTORS RELATING TO HELPING PROFESSIONAL ORGANISATIONS AND SYSTEMS…CLINICS, HOSPITAL, INSURANCE COMPANIES, FAMILY, FRIENDS (Yontef) Wider context – Psychotherapy/Supervision field in Britain, Europe as a wider context In formal education very little attention is paid to cultural issues. In Britain the crosscultural training in supervision begins to develop and there are not many supervisors educated for multicultural counseling, especially for multicultural supervision. Elefgerido proposes that culture involves common events, practices, roles, values, myths, rules, beliefs, habits, symbols… transcending ethnical and racial boundaries. Definition of culture that recognizes all people in their total complexity, involving their racial and cultural identity, is more suitable for the therapist because it enables them to work with the complex differences existing within one or between cultural groups in the certain context (reference to our group…cultural and religious differences..) We should consider our psychotherapeutic models and their influences on people coming from different culture, time and context. SAMUELS (1993) said that it is impossible to describe a person separated from his/her cultural, social, gender, ethnic and above all economical and ecological context. The western society - cultural pluralism and recognition of multiculturality It is important that the psychotherapist explores that client’s feelings toward the therapist from different race and culture. It is also important to have capacity to accept the client’s distrust or resentment toward majority culture Erfderido proposes that counselors should transcend their cultural differences. It can be done by phenomenological analysis because 6 it acknowledges the client’s and therapist’s unique world view and challenges the therapist’s world view and value system that influence the therapist work. A genuine dialogue needs the appreciation of differences. Supervisors have a moral responsibility to become aware of multicultural issues. The same responsibility belongs to their training organizations. The psychotherapy and supervision context in UK is rich, various, changeable and extremely complex to be understood. Training in the supervision and psychotherapist’s development progressed in last two decades. There is a wide range of trainings in supervision. Development of training in supervision is a new phenomenon in Europe. Attempts to connect the supervisors in Europe. World Association for psychotherapy. Developments in the field of supervision in the whole world. Literature: 1.Perls,F.,Hefferline,R.,Goodman,P.1951(PHG)Gestalt Therapy,interni prevod IItom 2.Maria CGilbert &Kenneth Evans Psychotherapy supervision-An integrative relational approach to psychotherapy supervisin 3.Phil Joyce&Charlotte Sills -Skills in Gestalt Counselling & Psychitherapy 4.Bertram Muller,Gestalt Review,1(2):94-109,1997-The Total theraoeutic Context;The Craft of gestalt therapy:theory and Practice 7