PA Syllabus Articles
To Be Requested
Personnel Psychology
Banks, C. G, & Murphy, K. R. (1985). Toward narrowing the research practice gap in
performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology, 38, 335-345.
Jawahar, I. M., & Williams, C. R. (1997). Where all the children are above average: The
performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50, 905-925.
Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer,
and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.
Werner, J.M., & Bolino, M.C. (1997). Explaining U.S. Courts of Appeals decisions
involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness, and validation. Personnel
Psychology, 50, 1-24.
Bobko, P., & Colella, A. (1994). Employee reactions to performance standards: A review
and research propositions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 1-29.
Werner, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (1997). Explaining U.S. courts of appeals decisions
involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness, and validation. Personnel
Psychology, 50, 1-24.
Johnson, J. W. & Ferstl, K. L. (1999). The effects of interrrater and self-other agreement
on performance improvement following upward feedback. Personnel Psychology,
52, 271-303.
Walker, A. G., & Smither, J. W. (1999). A five year study of upward feedback: What
managers do with their results matter. Personnel Psychology, 52, 393-423.
Journal of Applied Psychology
Feldman, J. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance
appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127-148.
Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance
appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130-135.
DeNisi, A. S., & Peters, L. H. (1996). Organization of information in memory and the
performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 81, 717-737.
Sanchez, J.I., & DeLa Torre, P. (1996). A second look at the relationship between rating
and behavioral accuracy in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 81, 3-10.
Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F.
(2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of
performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 86 (5), 965-973.
Cawley, B.D., Keeping, L.M., & Levy, P.E. (1998). Participation in the performance
appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field
investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615-633.
Landy, F.J., Barnes, J.L., & Murphy, K.R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and
accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751-754.
Landy, F.J., Barnes-Ferrell, J., & Cleveland. (1980). Perceived fairness and accuracy of
performance evaluation: A follow-up. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 355356
Facteau, J. D., & Craig, S. B. (2001). Are performance appraisal ratings from different
rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 215-227.
Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effects of the performance appraisal system on
trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology,
84 (1), 123-126.
Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E. (2001). 360 Feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and
perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (5), 930-942.
Book Chapters
Caroll, S. J., & Schneier, C. E., (1982). Performance appraisal and review (PAR)
systems: A human resource management activity in an organizational context. In
S.Caroll, & C. Schneier (Eds.), Performance appraisal and review systems: The
identification, measurement, and development or performance in organizations
(pp. 1-27). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
DeNisi, A. S., & Williams, K. J. (1998). Cognitive approaches to performance appraisal.
In G. Ferris & K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource
management (Vol. 6; pp, 109-155). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1983). Cognitive aspects of the process model of performance
rating: Theory and research. In F. Landy, & J. Farr (Eds.). The measurement of
work performance: Methods, theory, and applications (pp. 217-145). San Diego:
Academic Press.
Mohrman, A.M., & Lawler, E.E. (1983). Motivation and performance appraisal behavior.
In G. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and
theory (pp. 173-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Villanova, P., & Bernhardin, H.J., (1991). Performance appraisal: The means motive, and
opportunity to manage impressions. In R.A. Giacolone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.),
Applied impression management: How image-making affects managerial
decisions (pp. 81-96). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ilgen, D.R. (1993). Performance appraisal accuracy: An illusive or sometimes misguided
goal? In H. Schuler, J.L. Farr, & M. Smith (Eds.), Personnel selection and
assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 235-252). Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for
performance appraisal. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in
Organizational Behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 129-177). JAI Press.
Gilliland, S.W., & Langdon, J.C. (1998). Creating performance management systems that
promote perceptions of fairness. In J.W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal:
State of the art in practice (pp. 209-243). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Balzer, W.K., & Sulsky, L.M. (1990). Performance appraisal effectiveness and
productivity. In K. Murphy & F. Saal (Eds.), Psychology in organizations:
Integrating science and practice. (pp.133-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dickenson, T.L. (1993). Attitudes about performance appraisal. In H. Schiler, J.L. Farr,
& M. Smith (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and
organizational perspectives. (pp.141-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steers, R.R., & Lee, T.W. (1983). Facilitating effective performance appraisals: The role
of employee commitment and organizational climate. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J.
Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 75-88). Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Caroll, S.J., Scneier, C.E. (1982). Implementation, management, and evaluation of
performance appraisal and review (PAR). In S. Caroll, & C. Schneier (Eds.),
Performance appraisal and review systems: The identification, measurement, and
development of performance in organizations (pp. 217-248). Glenview, IL: Scott
Foresman.
Squires, P., & Adler S. (1998). Linking appraisals to individual development and
training. In J.W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in
practice (pp. 445-495). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bernardin, H.J., & Villanova, P. (1986). Performance appraisal. In E.A. Locke (Ed.),
Generalizing from laboratory to field settings: Research findings from industrialorganizational psychology, organizational behavior, and human resource
management (pp. 43-62). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
DeNisi, A. S. (2000). Performance appraisal and performance management: A multilevel
analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research,
and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp.
121-156). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Farr, J. L., (1993). Informal performance feedback: Seeking and giving. In H. Schuler, J.
Farr, & M. Smith (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and
organizational perspectives (pp. 163-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Other
DeCotiis, T., & Petit, A. (1978). The performance appraisal process: A model and some
testable propositions. Academy of Management Review, 3, 635-646.
Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980) Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72-107.
Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions.
Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80-105.
Longenecker, C. O., Sims, H. P., & Gioia, D. A. (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of
employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 183-193.
Meyer, H. H., Kay, E. & French, J. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard
Business Review, 43, 123-129.
Williams, K. J., DeNisi, A. S., Blencoe, A. G., & Cafferty, T. P. (1985). The role of
performance appraisal purpose: Effects of purpose on information acquisition and
utilization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 314339.
Bozeman, D. P. (1997). Interrater agreement in multi-source performance appraisal: A
commentary. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 313-316.
Moses, J., Hollenbeck, G. P., & Sorcer, M. (1993). Other people’s expectations. Human
Resource Management, 32, 283-297.
Klimoski, R., & Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 194-208.
Tziner, A., Kopelman, R.E., Livneh, N. (1993). Effects of performance appraisal format
of perceived goal characteristics, appraisal process satisfaction, and changes in
rated job performance: A field experiment. The Journal of Psychology, 127, 281291.
Giles, W.F., Findley, H.M., & Field, H.S. (1997). Procedural fairness in performance
appraisal: Beyond the review session, Journal of Business and Psychology, 11,
493-506.
Church, A.H. (1995). From both sides now. Performance appraisals: Political tools or
effective measures? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 33, (2) 57-64.
Bretz, R.D., Milkovich, G.T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance
appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of
Management, 18, 321-352.
Ilgen, D.R., Barnes-Farrell, J.L., & McKellin, D.B. (1993). Performance appraisal
process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use?
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 321-368.
Baruch, Y. & Harel, G. (1993) Combining multi-source performance appraisal: An
empirical and methodological note. Public Administration Quarterly, 17 (1), 96111.
DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A.N. (2000). Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy
of Management Executive 14, (1) 129-139.
Waldman,D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Antonioni, D. (1998). Has 360 degree feedback gone
amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12 (2), 86-94.
Kerr, S. (1995). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of
Management Executive, 9 (1) 7-14.
DeMatteo, J.S., Eby, L.T., & Sundstrom, E. (1998). Team-based rewards: Current
empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational
Behavior, 20, 141-183.
TI: Is there a preferred performance rating format?: A non-psychometric perspective
AU: Tziner, Aharon; Kopelman, Richard E
SO: Applied Psychology: An International Review. Vol 51(3), Jul 2002, pp. 479-503
TI: Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals
AU: Erdogan, Berrin
SO: Human Resource Management Review. Special Issue: Papers from the 2nd
Innovative HR/IR Teaching Conference. Vol 12(4), Win 2002, pp. 555-578