Study Questions for Examination #4 Class #24: Transition to Pragmatism 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. What is constructive alternativism? How is it related to the following quote by Einstein: “the whole of science is nothing more than the refinement of everyday thinking.” What is the correspondence theory of truth? What is realism? Is science a search for the truth? What are the three basic components of unrepresentative realism? What is Pierce’s pragmatic maxim? How is it related to the story from William James concerning the squirrel going round the tree? Write a short essay summarizing and interpreting the following passage: “We can appraise our theories from the point of view of the extent to which they successfully come to grips with some aspect of the world, but we cannot go further to appraise them from the point of view of the extent to which they describe the world as it really is, simply because we do not have access to the world independently of our theories in a way that would enable us to assess the adequacy of those descriptions.” Class #25: Introduction to Pragmatism 1. What does it mean to say that a text deconstructs? Provide an example. 2. Why does Cherryholmes believe that readings are always contested? How are such “contests” related to equivocality? 3. Discuss the following statement from Cherryholmes: “tracing consequences is a cognitive, social, political, and artistic enterprise.” In the course of your discussion, please address each of the four characteristics of the enterprise (e.g., cognitive, social, etc.). 4. What does it mean to say that pragmatism is characterized by the following features: fallibilistic, contextual, contingent, and holistic? 5. Why is pragmatism anti-foundational according to Cherryholmes? Class #26: Truth, Meaning and Pragmatism 1. Discuss the relationship between truth and meaning posited by Cherryholmes. 2. What is the difference between truth and Truth according to Cherryholmes? What does it mean for a pragmatist to pursue truth rather than Truth? 3. Provide an interpretation of Figure 1.1 from Cherryholmes. 4. Interpret the following: To read at all, we must read the book of ourselves in the texts in front of us, and we must bring the text home, into our thoughts and lives, into our judgments and deeds. We cannot enter the texts we read, but they can enter us. . . reading requires us to make the text our own in thought, word, and deed. 5. What are the basic tenets of the modernist’s foundational epistemology? Relate these tenets to the basic characteristics of the Enlightenment. Class #27: The Linguistic Turn [20 points] 1. What is the linguistic turn? Why is it important to the scientific study of politics? 2. Identify and discuss three issues that must be resolved in order to speak correctly about the world. 3. Rorty says that it is possible to view social science as continuous with literature (fiction). What implications follow from viewing social science research as a story? 4. According to Cherryholmes, how do we become better artists of ordinary experience? Class #28: Correct Inductive Inference 1. What are the premises of the inductively correct argument? 2. What is the conclusion of the inductively correct argument? 3. Compare and contrast Type 1 and Type 2 errors.What is validity? 4. How does the correct inductive inference differ from the “affirming the consequent” argument? 5. Discuss the pragmatist approach to truth Overall Questions 1. W. V. O. Quine observes: “Each man is given a scientific heritage plus a continuing barrage of sensory stimulation; and the considerations which guide him in warping his scientific heritage to fit his continuing sensory promptings are, where rational, pragmatic.” What follows are a series of questions related to various portions of his observation. 1. “Each person is given a scientific heritage” a. What is the heritage? b. Where does it come from? c. How is it spread? (meme) 2. “Each person has a continuing barrage of sensory stimulation” a. How much sensory stimulation is actually received? b. What is the process of perception? c. How does the perceptual “excerpt” fit into the construction of the analog world? 3. “Considerations that guide a person in warping his scientific heritage to fit his sensory promptings” a. How does this fit into the construction of a narrative? b. How do we attach meaning? c. What role does the tree of talking play in creating a text? 4. “Where rational, pragmatic” a. Tracing the consequences – how is it related to rational choice? b. What does it mean to be a pragmatic realist? c. What sorts of arguments are persuasive? . 2. Using the following quotation as a point of departure, “The scientist who supposes that he is single-mindedly dedicated to the search for truth deceives himself . . . He seeks system, simplicity, scope; and when satisfied on these scores, he tailors truth to fit. He as much decrees and discovers the laws he sets forth, as much designs and discerns the patterns he delineates.” write a six paragraph essay that focuses on the following topics: Paragraph #1 – [Focus: “scientist . . . search for truth”] Possible topics include: purpose of science Paragraph #2 – [Focus: “system, simplicity, scope] Possible topics include: nature of real world (i.e., complexity, cause and effect), theory. Paragraph #3 – [Focus: “when satisfied . . . tailors truth to fit”] Possible topics include: the real world/theory connection (e.g., realism, relativism, unrepresentative realism) Paragraph #4 – [Focus: “decree and discover laws”] Possible topics include: systems thinking, templates. Paragraph #5 – [Focus: “discern patterns”] Possible topics include: problem of induction, Hume’s paradox, theory dependence of observation. Paragraph #6 – [Focus: “deceives him/herself”] Conclusion – to what extent is the traditional conception of science based upon self-deception?