Instructor’s Chapter Evaluation
Programming Language Pragmatics, 2e
Michael L. Scott
Chapter
Reviewer
1.
Were all chapter sections assigned? If not, which sections were omitted
and why?
2.
Are any subjects too lightly or too heavily covered? Are there any glaring
omissions? Are there any terms you think need improvement in definition,
either in placement of the definition or in the content of the definitions?
3.
Are the diagrams/illustrations adequate? If not, what material would be
improved by additional graphical content? If you have specific
suggestions about how the material is presented or illustrated, please feel
free to give as much detail as necessary.
4.
Please comment on the technical accuracy of the material.
Michael L. Scott
Programming Language Pragmatics, 2e
Instructor Evaluation Form
5.
Is the organization of the chapter appropriate?
6.
What is your opinion of the writing style?
7.
Is the level of presentation appropriate for your students? (This is of
particular importance given the new pedagogical features added to this
edition.) Was the chapter accessible?
8.
How well are each of the topics developed?
9.
What are the three greatest strengths of this chapter?
Page 2 of 3
Michael L. Scott
Programming Language Pragmatics, 2e
Instructor Evaluation Form
10. What are the greatest weaknesses of this chapter and what suggestions
can you make for improvement?
11. Which topics did your students have the greatest difficulty in
understanding?
12. Which exercises did you assign?
13. Which exercises proved to be the most valuable? Which exercises were
the least valuable, or were in some way problematic for the students?
14. Please provide any additional feedback or suggestions here.
Page 3 of 3