ECONOMIC-POLITICAL CONTEXT TASK ONE – IMPACT OF ECONOMIC CONTEXT ON BARGAINING Page 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Title Decline in % workers in Private Sector Unions Corps Deny Collective Bargaining Rights Number of Strikes Un/Under Employment Private Sector not Providing Jobs Workers produce more but are paid less % workers with Defined Benefit % Workers who pay no Premiums % Firms offering Retiree Health Labor Union Favorability Business Invests a lot more in politics Supreme Court Supports business interests Times Selected 9 4 3 5 1 3 6 1 The Percent of Private Sector Workers in Unions Union Members as Percentage of Private Sector Workforce (1920-2009) 40% 35.7% 35% 28.5% 30% 25% 20% 17.1% 15% 10% 6.9% 5% 0% 1920 1945 1960 1975 1990 2005 2008 2010 Source: 1933-1982 from Troy and Shiflin, US Union Sourcebook, 1985; all other data from Bureau of Labor Statistics, Union Members, various years. 2 The Number of Major Work Stoppages Fell to Just 5 in 2009 Number of Work Stoppages Idling 1,000 Workers or More (1947-2009) 500 470 450 424 400 350 300 250 200 181 150 100 50 5 0 1947 1951 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Major Work Stoppages 2009, Table 1, released February 2010. 3 2003 2007 0 9 Workers Produce More but Are Paid Less Real Weekly Wages: Actual Compared to Estimated Increases If Tied to Productivity Increases (1947-2008) $1,171 Projected Real Wage if tied to Productivity Gains $778 $746 $443 $612 $443 1947 Actual Real Wage 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2008 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics—Productivity, Average Wage of Non-Supervisory Production Workers, Consumer Price Index; Les Leopold, The Looting of America, 2009 4 The Richest 1% Cornered the Highest Share of National Income Since 1928 Share of Income Held by the Top 1% of U.S. Households (1913-2007) 30% 25% 1928: 23.9% 2007: 23.5% 20% 15% 10% 1975: 8.9% 5% 0% 1913 1923 1933 1943 1953 1963 1973 1983 1993 2003 Source: Emmanuel Saez: Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Update with 2007 estimates), August 5, 2009. 5 TASK TWO – CORPORATE AGENDA The Corporate Agenda What Corporations Did What They Said Would Happen Cut Labor Reduce/Eliminate Unions Cut Labor Costs Increase Productivity Globalize Increased Profits Increased Investment Increased Jobs Increase Wages Cut Government Cut Taxes, Social Spending Deregulate Environment Trade Labor Politics Privatize and Cut Govt Jobs 6 THE CORPORATE AGENDA IN ACTION – your responses Reduce Labor Costs Cut Wages o Reduce Paid hours o Reduce paid time off o Two-Tiering (also applies to benefits) o Shift work to lower paid titles o Increase the number of part-time workers (also applies to benefits) o Force workers to purchase own equipment, boots, etc. Reduce Benefits o Reduce benefits; e.g. health and pension o Limit or eliminate retiree health o Cost Shifting e.g., health premiums, copays, deductibles, out of pocket; pension Reduce Union Workforce o Layoffs o Attrition o Early Retirement o Freeze unfilled positions – no backfilling o Outsourcing + Contract Out o Privatization (in public sector – similar to contracting out, etc). o Consolidation of job titles/positions (consolidate agencies in public sector) o Shift work to management o Double Breasting o Mis-classification Increase Labor Productivity Reduce Labor Force But Same or More Output o Fewer workers to do same or more work o Split shifts – less people working when demand is lower Increase work day/week/year o Reduce vacations, holidays, increase hours of work o Absence control plans Productivity Plans/Measurement Programs with increased discipline o Carrot Use fear to intimidate workers Tie pay to productivity increases (merit pay in public sector) Productivity Incentives o Stick Set unreasonable benchmarks Constantly increasing the objectives Surveillance Programs Micro manage workers Technology/Automation o Software: voice response; automated testing of equipment; customer ordering, trouble reporting, tracking maintenance, self-installation; o Hardware: new switches, fiber optics, machines, etc. 7 Reduce Power of Unions Reduce size/percentage of union represented workers o Reduce size of union workforce; increase size of non-represented o Contract work to non-union o Transfer work to locations with no union or weak union Divide the union workforce and conquer o Two-tiering creates divide among workers, weakens solidarity Weaken the union o Reduce number and/or percentage of represented workers o Constant attack on union, constant assault on contract, constant concessions o Don’t negotiate with the union o Blame union for unpopular policies o Promote union leaders into management o Convince workers that all gains were given by the company, not won by the union o Don’t allow union orientation for new workers o Dis-empower local union leadership Previously, local union leaders and local mgt would solve issues Now it all goes to labor relations Previously, local union and company bargaining teams had authority; Now, it all goes to the top, weakening our elected barg teams o Intentionally violate the contract Keeps stewards busy with individual grievances No time to organize, mobilize, lobby – which weakens unions further o Scare tactics through disciplinary actions o Anti-union organizing tactics and campaigns Aggressive tactics Fire employees who lead organizing efforts Not agreeing to first contracts Politics and Enforcement o Disrupt/halt effective enforcement of labor law and worker rights o Spend a lot on politics and opposing pro-worker politicians o Destroy pro-worker legislation – e.g. collective bargaining rights o Pass anti-worker legislation: right to work, paycheck deception, carrier of last resort o Gut pro-worker regulatory protections o Weakening unions will lead to ability to attack civil rights, environment, etc. 8 QUESTIONS TO ADDRESS 1. Given the attack on workers by the company you will bargain with – what does the local union need to do to increase your leverage (union power) at the bargaining table? 2. What skills are needed for you and your committee to be more effective bargainers? 9