Electronic Documentations: Legal Recognition Electronic Communications and Transaction Act 25/2002 ( summary – with compliments to Compliserve ) This summary is intended to provide general guidance and does not constitute advice relating to specific instances. It is important that you also read the full text of the ECT Act 25/2002 The ECT Act does not compel anyone to use or receive information in electronic form, nor does it prohibit anyone specifying requirements for the manner in which they will accept data messages. The ECT Act may therefore not discriminate between papers and electronic documents. Effectively, the ECT Act does not create new ways of doing business; it only facilitates and gives legal recognition to the new ways of doing business i.e. through electronic documentations. Section 11: Legal Recognition of data messages · Provides for the legal recognition of data messages. Information that is wholly or partly in the form of a data message is not without legal force and effect merely because of the fact that it is in the form of a data message. · ‘Data message’ is data that is generated, sent, received or stored by electronic means and includes voice where the voice is used in an automated transaction and a stored record. ‘Data’ means any form of electronic representations of information. · Information can be incorporated by reference, provided that such information is referred to in a way in which a reasonable person would notice such reference and incorporation and provided further that such information is accessible in a form in which it may be retrievable and stored, whether electronically or in the form of a computer printout. Please note: Not all information in the form of data message or referred to in a data message will be given legal force and effect, since section 11 is not intended to CompliNEWS 30 May 2008 15 override any mandatory provisions in South African law relating to data messages. Section 12: Writing A requirement in law that a document or information be in writing is met if the document or information is in electronic format that is accessible in such a manner that the person retrieving it would be able to use it afterwards. Generally, all documents and agreements that previously had to be in writing can be generated electronically, except the following: Agreements for the sale of immovable property A long term lease of immovable property for 20 years or more The execution, retention and presentation of a will or codicil The execution of a bill of exchange Documents/agreements, which by agreement between the parties may not be generated electronically. Le Roux v Hon Magistrate Mr. Viana (2007) SCA 173 (RSA): The Supreme Court of Appeal found that judicial notice should be taken of the technological advancements regarding electronic data creation, recording and storage. The Supreme Court of Appeal also referred to and quoted Section 12 of the ECT Act. Section 13: Signature The effect of this section is to give legal recognition to electronic signatures. However, where the law requires a signature, only an advanced signature shall be used. An advanced electronic signature is an electronic signature that can be authenticated only by an agency that has been accredited by the Department of Communications in terms of section 37 ECT Act. Where contracting parties failed or neglected to agree on the electronic signature to be used, the presumption is that the requirement of a signature is met if a method is used to identify the person (who has purportedly ‘signed’ the electronic communication) and to indicate such person’s approval of the message. Such an expression of intent can be made by any means from which such person’s intent can be inferred. Section 14: Original For purposes of this provision, it should be noted that a computer printout of an ‘original’ electronic document does not constitute an original. An original message remains in electronic form, and it is the first generated copy by the sender or an agent of the sender. Section 16: Retention Information can be retained electronically, provided it is retained in the format in which it was generated, sent or received; or in the format that can be demonstrated to represent accurately the information generated, sent or received. This provision makes retention easier for those institutions required to keep records, either by virtue of the nature of their business or by law. Section 22: Formation and validity of agreements The mere fact that an agreement was concluded wholly or partly through data messages does not imply that such an agreement will be without legal force and effect. The time and place of formation of an agreement, concluded through data messages, will be the time and place where the offer or receives the acceptance of the offer. Section 23: Time & place of communications, dispatch and receipt · There is a presumption that a data message has been sent when it enters an information system outside the control of the originator. If the originator and addressee are using the same information system, the presumption is that the message has been sent when it is capable of being retrieved by the addressee. · A data message must be regarded as having been received by the addressee when the complete data message enters an information system designated and used for that purpose by the addressee and is capable of being retrieved and processed by the addressee. · An electronic transaction is deemed to have been concluded at the time when and the place where the acceptance of the offer is received by the offer or. · Please note: These deeming provisions apply only if parties (to an agreement) have not agreed otherwise. Practical implications of the ECT Act Business needs to make sure that all client communications, online advertisement and notices comply with the requirements for “legal” spamming as per the Act. · Business needs to be mindful of which types of databases the Minister will declare as being a critical database. They will then be required to comply with the requirements specified by the Minister for the storage and management of such databases. They will also be required to register such databases and supply the details of the administrator of the database.(see section 53 & 54) Business who wish to store information or company documents, which are required by law to be stored, in electronic format can do so, provided that they comply with the requirements for storage of electronic data. Business must assess their risk very carefully before they toss out all paper documentation, because (i) It is not clear from the wording of the Act that where an original is paper based and then is converted to an electronic form and such “original” is required to be kept in terms of a law, that the requirements of that law is fulfilled by retaining the electronic version only. (ii) In some cases, such as with cheques or claims forms or the like which require an original signature, where such documents are signed in handwriting, it may be prudent for the business to retain the original paperbased document for use in subsequent litigation proceedings, where it may be necessary to carry out forensic examination of the actual signature for example, to prove forgery. Please note: Information for this summary was sourced from academic writers and various reliable websites. This summary highlights the most important sections around the legal recognition of electronic documentations and the practical implications in terms of the ECT Act. This summary is intended to provide general guidance and does not constitute advice relating to specific instances. It is important that you also read the full text of the ECT Act 25/2002.