ASSURE Model Instructional Plan Title of Lesson or Unit: Geologic Time Teacher Name: L. Montgomery Grade: 8 Subject: Science Duration: 80 minutes Analyze Learners 1. 2. 3. 4. __ students __ males / __ females Ages __ Mental, Social, Physical, Social Notes such as: o ___ children have ADHD o Visual, Kinesthetic, and Verbal learners in the classroom o ___ children speak English as their second language o ___ child is living in a foster home. 5. Children proficient in reading skills. Strengthening their reading comprehension capabilities, as well as their ability to relate lesson to his/her personal life. 6. Learning Styles (Estimate % of Students) o Visual __ % o Auditory (Aural) __ % o Kinesthetic (Hands On) __ % State Objectives Competency Goal 5 - The learner will conduct investigations and utilize appropriate technologies and information systems to build an understanding of evidence of evolution in organisms and landforms. Objective – 5.01 - Interpret ways in which rocks, fossils, and ice cores record Earth's geologic history and the evolution of life including: Geologic Time Scale Index Fossils Law of Superposition Unconformity Evidence of Climate Change Extinction of Species Catastrophic Events Page 1 of 3 Last Revised: December 11, 2005 Select Media, Materials, and Methods All media and materials needed for the lesson are listed, and are lesson appropriate. Smart Board or overhead-projector for class discussion and brainstorming Computer Lab with SAS Curriculum Pathways Software Geologic Time, InterActivity 951 Software contains online journal for students Utilize Media, Materials, and Methods Smart board/Over-head projector – This will be used as an overview to introduce students to the topic of the Geologic Time Scale. This will also serve as a student introduction to the SAS Curriculum Pathways Software. Computers – Students will work individually, and will complete the assignment embedded within the lesson. Completed Assignment – Students will submit completed work via electronically to the instructor. Require Learner Participation Introduction: Introduce students to the topic of the Geologic Time Scale. Students will investigate relative and absolute dating methods, including the following: Determining the relative ages of exposed layers and features of a canyon wall Analyzing tree-ring patterns to determine the absolute ages of trees and to recognize events in a tree’s history Analyzing isotope data to determine the absolute ages of exposed layers and features of a canyon wall Activity: Begin by introducing students (or give a recap) of the SAS Curriculum Pathways Software in the classroom. Students will then move to the media center computer lab to work individually. Online Simulation This activity will strengthen students’ understanding of the key words: relative dating and absolute dating, as it relates to the Geologic Time Scale. Students will complete the journal by interacting with the online simulation. Analysis After completing the online simulation, students will complete the prepare analysis. This will assure student understanding of key concepts. Wrap-up Students will e-mail their completed work to the instructor. 5 minute review Reinforce what the students should have learned from the lesson. Page 2 of 3 Last Revised: December 11, 2005 Evaluate & Revise Student Performance Students will be evaluated on how well they worked independently in the Geologic Time Scale lesson from SAS Curriculum Pathway. The teacher will move around the room and observe how students work on their assignment. Journals and analyses will be graded on completion, grammar/spelling, and content. Media Effectiveness Was the SmartBoard useful in promoting class discussion? Did it prove useful for visual learners? Did it aid in student understanding of the SAS Curriculum Pathway Software? Did the online simulation activity work well amongst the class? Was it easy to use? Was it helpful for kinesthetic learners? Was the journal / analysis worksheet helpful in focusing student responses’? Instructor Performance Did the lesson run smoothly? Was it well-planned? Did the class respond well to the lesson? Were the learning objectives achieved? Could the lesson be improved in the future? Page 3 of 3 Last Revised: December 11, 2005