1.Impacts of climate change on vulnera
areas
4.Model climate change le
5.Assisting public partic
3.Emissions reporting
2.Emissions trading
5 areas:
•
L
1.
Impacts
of
climate
change
on
o
vulnerable areas
•w
W
•o
l
ry
B
il
•Indigenous
d
o
n
impacts
d
g
ih
ve
c
r
e
o
i
ra
st
ita
tg
a
ye
l
•Submission regarding the Possible
Design
a National Greenhouse
2.forEmissions
trading Gas
Emissions
Trading Scheme-22 December
2006
•Submission on Prime Minister's
Task
Group on Emissions Trading
-Issues
Paper -7
March 2007
www.edo.org.au/edonsw/site/policy.php
•Submission on the National Greenhouse
and
Reportingreporting
Bill 2007
3. Energy
Emissions
•Sena
te
Com
mittee
Heari
ng
•B
•O
4.
Model
climate
change
ro
bj
•E
legislation
•C
ad
ec
mi
•R
o
er
ts
ssi
en
•C
m
•In
la
on
ew
o
•E
pli
de
w
s
ab
m
mi
an
pe
ref
re
le
pr
ssi
ce
nd
or
du
en
eh
on
an
en
m
cti
er
en
s
td
–E
on
gy
siv
tra
en
ad
P
tar
e
di
for
vis
B
ge
co
ng
ce
or
C
ts
ve
m
y
tri
ra
en
bo
gg
ge
t
dy
er
s
5. Assisting public participation
•EDO seminar series on
climate
change to CANA at the next meeting
•Legal Advisors
of the Conference of the parties to the
UNFCCC –Bali, December 2007
“On the day that Justice Jagotfound for the
Minister
for
Planning
developer
in
the
Carlton
Drake Brockman United Breweries (CUB)
Case she highlighted the fact that courts do not
make merit decisions, they simply uphold the law.
Whether or not that law is a donkey’s bottom is
irrelevant, it’s the law.”
v
Chris Harris, Deputy Lord Mayor, City of Sydney.
Humane Society International v
Kyodo SenpakuKaisha
•A
ut
ho
ris
•1958
ed
Inde
vir
nture
tu
Act
all
prote
y
cted
un
form
li
er
mi
oper
te
ator
d
BHP
po
llu
PRE 2000-UNLIMITED
POLLUTION
•10
year
2000
licen
•195
ce
•N
8
grant
ew
Inden
ed to
ow
ture
Ones
ne
Act
teelb
rliftedut
–
Envir
says
O
onme
little
ne
nt
about
st
Prote
fugiti
ee
ction
ve
lAct
dust
appli
emis
es
–FIRST EPA LICENCE
•A
ut
ho
ris
•195
ed
8
vir
Inden
tu
ture
all
Act
y
prote
un
cted
lim
form
ite
er
d
oper
po
ator
llut
BHP
io
PRE 2000-UNLIMITED
POLLUTION
RESIDENTS’ CIVIL
•Sought ENFORCMENT ACTION
compen
•Sec 104 of the Environment Protection
sation
Act
for
damage
to
property
& health
together
with
addition
al
monitori
ng
•R
•D
•One
us JANUARY
steel
esi
t
appe
de
co
aled
nt
ntr
agai
s’
ol
nst
bi
m
the
d
ea
licen
to
su
ce
be
re
–clai
co
s
med
m
for
requi
e
th
reme
a
e
nts
pa
fir
too
rty
st
hars
rej
2005 –SECOND EPA
LICENCE
OCT 2005 –INDENTURE ACT
•Inde
nture
Act
pass
•Replaces the EPA with the mining
ed &
minister
oper
ates
•Replaces new EPA licence with a
from
licence written by the Minister -minimal
3
dust
standards
Nov
2005
•July
•April
2006 OCT 2005
–Judge
–Full
–FURTHER
of
Cour
tSupre
me
refus
Court
es
overtur
resid
ns ERD
ents
Court
appe
-says
al.
residen
Does
ts do
not
not
com
have
ment
“standi
on
TO JULY 2006
LEGAL ACTION
STANDING
•by any
the
person
•by
104(7) An application under this section may
Auth
whosei
any
be made:
ority
nterest
other
orare
s
pers
anot
affecte
on
her
d
with
by
admi
the
the
niste
subject
perm
ring
matter
issio
agen
of
n
ofthe
cy;
applica
the
or
tion;
Cour
or
t.
JUDGEMENT
Interest:
•Greater
than
•Not
general
determined
•Examine each case
public
by
outcome
on
its the
merits
•Link
interest with the orders
sought
•Nee
d not
be
propri
etary
•C
a
•P
m
rot
pa
ec
ig
ts104: “Applicant’s interests are affected by
n
an
subject matter of application”
ag
d
•U
ai
en
nd
Red
ns
ha Dust Action Group objects:
ert
tak
nc
in
e
du
W
co
str
hy
m
ial
all
m
DeBelleJ:
po
a
un
these
objects not linked to subject matter of action
llut
en
ity
–controlling
dust emissions
io
vir
ed
n
on
uc
in
m
ati
W
en
on
hy
t
et
all
c
Judgement (cont)
Judgement (cont)
•Incorporated body does not
suffer environmental harm –its
members
do interest is an intellectual or
•The Group’s
emotional concern (ACF v Commonwealth
(1980) 146 CLR 493) must be more than
that.
MEDIATION
•Some remediation to
homes and properties
•Indepe
ndent
•Confidential
assess
•Does not prevent claim by non Red
ment
Dust person
3 Alcoa
WA alu
su
15% refineries
of the world’s