JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF CNC LATHE HEADSTOCK 1 MR. A.M.JOSHI, 2 PROF. P.M. KUBAVAT, 3MR. R.D.GONDALIYA 1M.E.[Machine Design] Student, Department Of Mechanical Engineering, School Of Engineering, RK Technical Campus, Rajkot ,Gujarat 2 Asst.Professor , Department Of Mechanical Engineering, School Of Engineering, RK Technical Campus, Rajkot ,Gujarat 3 M.E.[Machine Design] Student, Department Of Mechanical Engineering, School Of Engineering, RK Technical Campus, Rajkot ,Gujarat ashutosh1584@yahoo.co.in, pmk0079@gmail.com,gondaliya_rd@yahoo.com ABSTRACT: The machine tool is machine that imparts the required shape to a work piece with the desired accuracy of removing metal from the work piece in the form of chips. Beds, columns, bases, head stock are called “structures” in machine tool. In machine tool 70-80% of the total weight f the machine is due to structure. In this paper FE analysis of headstock is carried out for the specific cutting condition i.e. turning operation. Here, we prepared a headstock model in pro-E 4.0 software. Based on mathematical calculation values of cutting forces, and thrust forces are used in FE analysis. Here, we used ANSYS WORK BENCH 11.0 software for the FE analysis of the head stock (Machine tool structure).Through this analysis we get the result in terms of stresses and deformation and this result are within the allowable limits. Keywords—Machine tool structure, FE Analysis of Machine tool. I: INTRODUCTION The machine tool is a machine that imparts the required shape to a work piece with the desired accuracy of removing metal from the work piece in the form of chips. Machine tool parts, such as beds, bases, columns, box-type housings, carriages, tables, etc. are known as structures of machine tool. Function of the machine tool structure is to support and guide the work piece and cutting tool and to resist the cutting and feed forces encountered during the machining operations. Thus, structure of a machine tool forms the vital link between cutting tool and work piece on a metal cutting machine. The demand for higher accuracy NC lathes has increased dramatically with respect to machining accuracy requirements [3]. Beds, columns, bases and box type housings are called “structures” or “frames” in machine tool. In machine tools 70-80% of the total weight of the machine is due to the structure. [1] Recently, researches have been conducted in the field of improvement of structural design of machine tools by improving stiffness and lightening weight. The arrangement of stiffening ribs in machine tool structures is a key factor for structural stiffness and material consumption. So the lightening design of stiffening ribs is significant for machining performance and energy saving. [4] It is generally accepted that the precision of machine tools is determined by their static, dynamic and thermal characteristics. Especially, the dynamic characteristics play an important role in high speed, precision machine tool structures, because vibration during the machining process results in chatter marks on the machined surface and thus creates a noisy environment. Higher cutting speeds can be facilitated only by structures which have high stiffness and good damping characteristics. The deformation of machine tool structures under cutting forces and structural loads are responsible for the poor quality of products and which in turn is also aggravated by the noise and vibration produced. II: FUNCTION OF MACHINE TOOL STRUCTURE To provide rigid support on which various subassemblies can be mounted i.e. beds, bases, etc. To provide housings for individual units or their assemblies like speed gear box, spindle head, etc. To support and move the work piece and tool relatively, i.e. table, carriage, tail stock, etc. There are two common features, which are fundamental to the satisfactory fulfillment of above requirements for all structures. These are: Proper selection of material. High static and dynamic stiffness.[5] Fig.1 Machine tool structure ISSN 0975 – 668X| NOV 11 TO OCT 12 | VOLUME – 02, ISSUE - 01 Page 134 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING III: MATERIAL USED FOR MACHINETOOL STRUCTURE The commonly used materials for machine tool structures are cast iron and steel. While in some applications Granite and ‘Epoxy Concrete’, newly developed material, is also introduced. Cast iron structures were almost exclusively used in machine tools till a decade or so ago, but lately welded steel structures are finding wider application due to advances in welding technology. Materials for the structure are cast iron, steel weldments, Granite and Epoxy concrete. Also Dai Gil Lee, et al [1] has suggested that, Fiber reinforced composite materials reduces the weight of slides up to 34% and increases damping by 1.5-5.7 times without sacrificing the stiffness and Positional accuracy of 5 micrometer per 300 mm of slide displacement. IV: PROBLEM FORMULATION The main objective of this study is to increase the structural stiffness, reduce the weight and deformation of machine tool structure like bed, head stock etc by using FEA software. With the use of ANSYS software FE analysis of CNC lathe centre head stock (Model Q Plus) is carried out for different operation. V: CUTTING FORCE CALCULATION As it is explained, for analysing the structure loads and constraints are required to specify. Loads should be calculated based on the worst condition that has to be bear by the structure during operation. Again one can still give some design safety by overloading the structure. Constraints also require attention, as they restrict and control the behaviour of component during actual operation and during analysis, itself. Here for our case of Q Plus cutting forces are calculated for two operations done on the machine tool, turning and drilling. Then calculated cutting forces are applied to the models of components of machine tool with constraints and results of analysis are obtained. During the analysis of all components of structure, Grey Cast Iron – G.C.I-25 is specified as the material of the structure and every time material specification is avoided during discussion. Cutting Force Calculation: Turning operation [6] Cutting forces are calculated based on several assumptions, regarding cutting conditions and values of cutting parameters, which will generate maximum cutting force. Assumptions are listed below: Assumptions: Diameter of work piece (D) - 50 mm Material to be cut – Medium carbon steel Cutting speed (v) – 250 m/min Feed per revolution (s )– 0.2 mm/rev Efficiency of transmission is taken 100% from motor to spindle; therefore full power of motor is available at spindle. Cutting speed, v = π D n /1000 So, spindle speed, n = v x 1000 / π D = 250 x 1000 / π x 50 = 1592 rpm Tangential cutting force, P = 6120 N / v z = 6120 x 7 / 250 = 1713.6 N = 1714 N Torque at spindle, T = 975 N / n s = 975 x 7 / 1592 = 42.87 Nm = 43 Nm 0 Take Approach angle: 45 Rack angle: +10 Nose radius: 0.2-0.4 mm Now resolving the cutting forces in two components Px and Py Px = 0.4 to 0.45 Pz = 771.12 N Py = 0.4 to 0.5 Pz = 856.8 N Cutting Force Calculation: Drilling operation [6] In case of drilling, predominant effect is of thrust generated during operation. The thrust force is proportional to the diameter of drill, material to be cut and feed per revolution. By taking 100% efficiency of transmission of power from motor to spindle, for maximum cutting force, power at spindle should be equal to power of motor. But for drilling this condition is having another constraint. Cutting forces are calculated based on several assumptions, regarding cutting conditions and values of cutting parameters, which will generate maximum cutting force. Assumptions are listed below: Assumptions: Diameter of Drill (D) – 20 mm Material to be cut – medium carbon steel Cutting speed (v) – 80 m/min Feed per revolution (s )– 0.1 mm/rev Cutting speed, v = π D n/1000 So, spindle speed, n = v x 1000 / π D = 80 x 1000 / π x 20 = 1274 rpm For this set of values of diameter and spindle speed, calculate power at spindle, 2 -5 N = 1.25 D K n (0.056+1.5 S) x 10 2 -5 = 1.25 x (20) x 1.45 x1274x (0.056+1.5x0.1) x 10 = 1.90 KW, that is much less than power of motor which is= 7 Kw Thrust force, 0.85 T = 1.16 K D (100 x S) h ISSN 0975 – 668X| NOV 11 TO OCT 12 | VOLUME – 02, ISSUE - 01 Page 135 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 0.85 = 1.16 x 1.45 x 20 x (100 x 0.1) = 2381.52 N, Maximum thrust Torque, T = 975 N / n = 975 x 2.37/ 1274 = 18.13 Nm VI: FE ANALYSIS OF HEAD STOCK Dimension of headstock: Length X 0.355 m Length Y 0.412 m Length Z 0.33 m Fig 4 Max. Shear Stresses in headstock Fig 2 Model of Head Stock Applying load for turning operation: Cutting forces in turning operation P x = 771.12 N Py= 856.8 N Fig 5 Total Deformation in headstock VII: CONCLUSION: Parameters Result Allowable value Max. Von misses Stress 7.4136e+005 Pa 8.2e+008 Pa Max. Stress 4.0752e+005 Pa 8.2e+008 Pa 4.1404e-006 m 5.0e-006 m Shear Max. Deformation Fig 3 Von misses stress in headstock As shown from the analysis that the maximum displacement is 4.14 μm which is within the allowable limit .So the performance of the head stock is satisfactory for the Turning operation. Again the stress distribution is uniform except the some cases as shown in figure. ISSN 0975 – 668X| NOV 11 TO OCT 12 | VOLUME – 02, ISSUE - 01 Page 136 JOURNAL OF INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING . REFRENCES [1] J D Suh and D G Lee, “Composite machine tool structures for high speed milling machines”, Advance Institute of Science and technology, Korea.. [2] David Te-Yen Huang, Jyh-Jon Lee, “On obtaining machine tool stiffness by CAE software”, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Research 41, 1149–1163, [2001] [3] M. Mori, H. Mizuguchi, M. Fujishima , Y. Ido , N. Mingkai , K. Konishi, “Design optimization and development of CNC lathe headstock to minimize thermal deformation”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58, 331–334, [2009]. [4] S. Syath Abuthakeer, P.V. Mohanram, G. Mohan Kumar, “Structural redesigning of a cnc lathe bed to improve its static and dynamic characteristics”, Inernational Journal of Engineering, Tome ix [2011]. [5] N.K.Meheta “Machine Tool Design and Numerical Control”, Tata McGraw Hill Publication, page 122-127. [6] CMTI machine tool design handbook, Tata McGraw Hill publication, 26th reprint, [1975]. ISSN 0975 – 668X| NOV 11 TO OCT 12 | VOLUME – 02, ISSUE - 01 Page 137