International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility Haydn Green Institute for Innovation & Entrepreneurship Innovation & Sustainability Conference - 4th/5th September 2014 Radical Change in Governing Natural Resources - Call for Papers There are obvious and increasing pressures on shared natural resources posing challenging questions about how these resources are to be governed. Considering looming crises and the limited action taken to prevent them, we need new and radically innovative ways to govern natural resources for a sustainable future. Business and management studies are in an opportune position to engage with this topic as, although corporations are not the only culprit, it is to business that we turn to find innovative solutions. Businessas-usual is not an option. With this conference we aim to advance the discussion at the intersection of innovation and sustainability. We are interested in themes and papers willing to re-imagine a) policies, practices and technologies, and b) organizing principles, entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurs, in order to innovatively and sustainably govern our natural resources compliance. Corporate Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Resources Professor Simon Mosey Corporate entrepreneurship is defined as the development of new products, services, organizational processes and new ways of doing business. We are interested in research and practice- based examples considering entrepreneurship as an approach to managing resources sustainably including, but not restricted to: Development of radical new technology to replace natural resource usage in manufacturing, energy production/distribution, logistics and retail. Open innovation approaches to developing new methods of doing business that reduce or replace natural resource usage. New partnership models between corporations, universities and/or the public sector to address challengers of sustainable energy, water, waste, food security and land use. Public Sector Innovation for Sustained Futures Dr Hannah Noke With growing pressure on public services, whether in healthcare, education or local government, innovation has become central to a sustained future. With decreasing resources and an increasing demand for services, there is a requirement for new ways of doing things, rather than simply doing things better. We are interested in research and practice that explores innovative approaches to enable a sustainable future including and expanding on: Integration of public services to provide cohesive service delivery, dealing with areas such as ageing population and priority families. Leading cultural change to enable the public sector to deliver a sustainable future, such as creating new partnerships with social enterprise. The role of the public sector in developing a joined-up approach, from policy, strategy, resources and delivery aligned to achieve sustainable development. Private-Public Networks in Service Innovation & Sustainability Dr Paul Windrum Public sector organizations are diverse and play many roles in the innovation process. They are innovators in their own right, whose innovations are used by private, third and public sector organizations. They engage in the co-production of innovations with partners from the private and third sectors. They are standards-setters who provide platforms for profit-making firms and third sector organisations. They are lead users and large purchasers of innovations which are developed in the public and other sectors. We welcome papers that consider network issues such as: Incentives for public-private innovation. Key resources and capabilities for creating and sustaining innovation networks and trust relationships. Barriers/enablers for the diffusion of new service innovations. Differences between technological and nontechnological service innovations. Movement of key personnel across public and private sector organizations. The role of regulation and public sector procurement policies. The role of citizens in demand and innovation networks. International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility Haydn Green Institute for Innovation & Entrepreneurship Sustainability & Marketing Theory Dr Rob Caruana & Dr Robert Cluley It is unsurprising that marketing is often seen as contributing to, rather than alleviating, pressures on the natural environment. Marketing is judged as ‘effective’ when society can consume more, and/or better, commodities. A key market response to climate change discourse has been to seek product innovations that enable a more ‘efficient’ use of natural resources. These kinds of market responses seem plausible in the context of traditional marketing theory, but critics point out that ‘sustainability’ discourse may be used to assuage consumers’ climatic anxieties, reinforce the (neoliberal) status quo and even, paradoxically, promote higher levels of (‘guilt free’) consumption. We invite papers that explore how marketing theory influences our understanding of sustainability including: The role of marketing theory in framing sustainability knowledge. The role of marketing in embedding (un)sustainable practices. Marketplace myths and framing of the natural environment. Sustainable innovation and consumer identity projects. Sustainability and resistance. Global Governance, Multinational Corporations & Sustainability – Professor Jeremy Moon, Dr Glen Whelan & Dr Sareh Pouryousefi Citizens’ use of technology (e.g. social media) to promote the sustainable development performance of MNCs. Sustainability, Impact & Innovation Dr Wendy Chapple The debate around the relationship between sustainability, responsible business practices and competitive advantage has shaped the CSR research agenda for years. More recently, the tide has turned, driven by the obvious and increasing pressure on shared natural resources. Sustainable business practices are now viewed as a necessary condition to do business and survive in the long term. With this drive for sustainable business practice comes the widening of the concept of performance, to include broader societal, environmental and economic impact of companies. Understanding these impacts is essential for sustainable business practice. As essential as innovation and change of behaviour/ technology/ processes/business structures to minimize negative and maximise positive impact on the environment, society and economy. We welcome papers addressing: Theories and Methodologies for corporate impact assessment (CIA) and the assessment of impact pathways. Barriers/enablers/resources required for the shift to corporate impact-orientated approach. Relationships between impact thinking and innovation. Mechanisms to align corporate behaviour and impact to International Sustainability agendas e.g. UN Millennium Development/Sustainable Development Goals. The role of Government/Rating Agencies/Business in developing impact assessment and reporting. The role of Government/Agencies in promoting impact orientated research and development. The role of current systems of governance in developing impact thinking within companies. Finance, Investment and Impact thinking. Others papers addressing Impact, Innovation and Sustainability are welcomed. Sustainability issues evoke global and complex concerns, and the role that different actors play in governing such issues is a contentious subject. Within the business ethics and corporate social responsibility literature, global governance concerns are often discussed in terms of corporations and citizenship, the political perspective of CSR, and the professional responsibilities of MNC managers. We welcome papers that consider such issues as: Academic researchers & practitioners interested in submitting a paper for presentation should submit an abstract of 1000 words (making sure to indicate one of the streams) by 30th April 2014 to karen.maltby@nottingham.ac.uk. Notification of acceptance will be made on 29th May 2014 The appropriate ‘division of labour’ between MNCs, states and non-government organizations. The sustainable development duties of MNC managers. The promotion or undermining of sustainable development global governance initiatives by MNCs. Co-optation, rent-seeking, and the motivations of MNCs in governing sustainability.