Report from Special Parish Assembly Meeting held on 8th May 2014 re
site allocations and settlement boundaries as part of the new Local
Plan Core Strategy.
The housing requirements for period 2011 to 2031 that Staffordshire Moorlands District Council
need to fulfil is shown in the table below:
Area
Amount
Required
Completions Commitments
Net Residual
Provision
Requirements.
Leek
30%
1800
425
578
797
Biddulph
20%
1200
115
272
813
Cheadle
22%
1320
154
86
1080
Rural
28%
1680
525
227
928
TOTAL
6000
1219
1163
3618
Blythe Bridge and Forsbrook is identified as a large village and as such had been judged to be able
to accommodate 150 homes – with 33% affordable housing and 60% one or two bedroomed
properties. Officers initially looked at over 2000 sites across the District some of which have been
ruled out because they were not considered suitable. The protection for Green Belt (N7) and
Special Landscape Area (N8 and N9) will be carried forward to the new Core Strategy but allocated
a replacement policy number.
The provision of sites for gypsies is being reviewed separately.
Consultations are now taking place to allow Parish Councils and residents to have their say.
In respect of Blythe Bridge and Forsbrook – 11 possible development sites have been identified
providing a total housing number of 280. Consultees will be asked to put forward the best options
for housing development. The areas and additional information is detailed below:
Blythe Bridge.
Reference: BB010/11/12/13 – Land North of 355/357 Uttoxeter Road, Blythe Bridge.
Site Area: 0.63 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 25 dwellings (at 40 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Brownfield and greenfield vacant and underused land, scout hut within settlement
boundary.
Key Issues: Access constraints to site, requires comprehensive development, retention/relocation of
scout hut required, some trees on site.
Owner/Developer Interest: Multiple ownerships, unknown.
Reference: BB021 – South of 218-234 Uttoxeter Road, Blythe Bridge.
Site Area: 1.04 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing or employment.
Capacity of Site: 30 dwellings (at 30 dwellings per hectare) or B1 employment.
Status of Land: Greenfield within settlement boundary, vacant and underused land.
Key Issues: Access constraints to site, ground conditions uncertain, not in flood zones 2 or 3 but
potentially impacted by flooding adjoining industrial use.
Owner/Developer Interest: Unknown.
Reference: BB087 – Land at 459 Uttoxeter Road, Blythe Bridge.
Site Area: 0.46 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing or employment.
Capacity of Site: 15 dwellings (at 33 dwellings per hectare) or B1/B2/B8.
Status of Land: Brownfield site in use for haulage and storage, outside of settlement boundary in
green belt.
Key Issues: Potential contamination from current use, loss of employment site.
Owner/Developer Interest: Yes.
(Note: The above is also being considered as a suitable permanent site for gypsies).
Reference: BB027/28 – Land west of Caverswall Road, Blythe Bridge.
Site Area: 2.07 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 30 dwellings (at 15 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Greenfield, outside of settlement boundary in green belt, agricultural land.
Key Issues: Need to improve access from Caverswall road, mature woodland nature conservation
area to south, adjoins River Blithe but not in flood zones 2 or 3, suitable for low density
development only.
Owner/Developer Interest: Unknown.
FORSBROOK
Reference: BB040 – junction of Caverswall Road & Caverswall Old Road, Forsbrook.
Site Area: 0.7 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 12 dwellings (at 36 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Vacant unused land, former brickworks site, outside of settlement boundary in
green belt. .
Key Issues: Historic landfill site requiring remediation/mitigation measures, trees along northern
boundary, narrow road access.
Owner/Developer Interest: Yes – supporting information available.
Reference: BB044 – Land off Chapel Street, Forsbrook.
Site Area: 1.25 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 30 dwellings (at 24 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Vacant unused land, former kennels, outside of settlement boundary in green belt
and special landscape area.
Key Issues: Partial flood zone 2 on edge of site, substantial woodland area on eastern half of site,
potential contamination from previous use. .
Owner/Developer Interest: Yes – supporting information available.
Reference: BB045 – North of 38 Dilhorne Road, Forsbook.
Site Area: 0.56 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 15 dwellings (at 30 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Greenfield grazing land, outside of settlement boundary in green belt.
Key Issues: Not in flood zones but watercourse through site, some large mature trees along
southern boundary.
Owner/Developer Interest: Yes – supporting information available.
Reference: BB050/81 – Land south of Draycott Old Road, Forsbrook.
Site Area: 0.59 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 18 dwellings (at 30 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Greenfield grazing land, outside of settlement boundary in green belt.
Key Issues: Flood zones 2 and 3 affect much of site to west (excluded) but some scope along
eastern half, mature trees along boundary, some historic landfill.
Owner/Developer Interest: Unknown.
Reference: BB054 – Land south of Draycott Old Road, Forsbrook.
Site Area: 2.9 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 70 dwellings (at 24 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Greenfield agricultural land outside of settlement boundary in green belt.
Key Issues: Partial flood zones 2 and 3 to west of site to west (excluded), some historic landfill near
to site.
Owner/Developer Interest: Unknown.
Reference: BB086 – Land rear of 71 Caverswall Road, Forsbrook.
Site Area: 0.73 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 15 dwellings (at 20 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Greenfield agricultural land, outside of settlement boundary in green belt.
Key Issues: Poor access – would require improvement or alternative provision.
Owner/Developer Interest: Yes.
Reference: BB062 – Land north of 85-91 Caverswall Road, Forsbrook.
Site Area: 0.94 hectares.
Potential Uses: Housing.
Capacity of Site: 20 dwellings (at 20 dwellings per hectare).
Status of Land: Greenfield agricultural land, outside of settlement boundary in green belt.
Key Issues: Some historic landfill near to site.
Owner/Developer Interest: Unknown.
The following information was not made available to us at the meeting but the Governments NPPF
was referred to several times. I have researched this on the internet and below is extract – 9
Protecting Green Belt land:
“9.
79.
80.
81.
Protecting Green Belt land
The Government attaches great importance to Green Belts. The fundamental
aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land
permanently open; the essential characteristics of Green Belts are their
openness and their permanence.
Green Belt serves five purposes:
● to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas;
● to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another;
● to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment;
● to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and
● to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict
and other urban land.
Once Green Belts have been defined, local planning authorities should plan
positively to enhance the beneficial use of the Green Belt, such as looking for
opportunities to provide access; to provide opportunities for outdoor sport
and recreation; to retain and enhance landscapes, visual amenity and
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
biodiversity; or to improve damaged and derelict land.
The general extent of Green Belts across the country is already established.
New Green Belts should only be established in exceptional circumstances, for
example when planning for larger scale development such as new
settlements or major urban extensions. If proposing a new Green Belt, local
planning authorities should:
● demonstrate why normal planning and development management policies
would not be adequate;
● set out whether any major changes in circumstances have made the
adoption of this exceptional measure necessary;
● show what the consequences of the proposal would be for sustainable
development;
● demonstrate the necessity for the Green Belt and its consistency with Local
Plans for adjoining areas; and
● show how the Green Belt would meet the other objectives of the
Framework.
Local planning authorities with Green Belts in their area should establish
Green Belt boundaries in their Local Plans which set the framework for Green
Belt and settlement policy. Once established, Green Belt boundaries should
only be altered in exceptional circumstances, through the preparation or
review of the Local Plan. At that time, authorities should consider the Green 20 | National
Planning Policy Framework
Belt boundaries having regard to their intended permanence in the long
term, so that they should be capable of enduring beyond the plan period.
When drawing up or reviewing Green Belt boundaries local planning
authorities should take account of the need to promote sustainable patterns
of development. They should consider the consequences for sustainable
development of channelling development towards urban areas inside the
Green Belt boundary, towards towns and villages inset within the Green Belt
or towards locations beyond the outer Green Belt boundary.
When defining boundaries, local planning authorities should:
● ensure consistency with the Local Plan strategy for meeting identified
requirements for sustainable development;
● not include land which it is unnecessary to keep permanently open;
● where necessary, identify in their plans areas of ‘safeguarded land’
between the urban area and the Green Belt, in order to meet longer-term
development needs stretching well beyond the plan period;
● make clear that the safeguarded land is not allocated for development at
the present time. Planning permission for the permanent development of
safeguarded land should only be granted following a Local Plan review
which proposes the development;
● satisfy themselves that Green Belt boundaries will not need to be altered
at the end of the development plan period; and
● define boundaries clearly, using physical features that are readily
recognisable and likely to be permanent.
If it is necessary to prevent development in a village primarily because of the
important contribution which the open character of the village makes to the
openness of the Green Belt, the village should be included in the Green Belt.
If, however, the character of the village needs to be protected for other
reasons, other means should be used, such as conservation area or normal
development management policies, and the village should be excluded from
the Green Belt.
As with previous Green Belt policy, inappropriate development is, by
definition, harmful to the Green Belt and should not be approved except in
very special circumstances.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
When considering any planning application, local planning authorities should
ensure that substantial weight is given to any harm to the Green Belt. ‘Very
special circumstances’ will not exist unless the potential harm to the Green
Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly
outweighed by other considerations.
A local planning authority should regard the construction of new buildings as
inappropriate in Green Belt. Exceptions to this are:
● buildings for agriculture and forestry;Achieving sustainable development | 21
● provision of appropriate facilities for outdoor sport, outdoor recreation
and for cemeteries, as long as it preserves the openness of the Green Belt
and does not conflict with the purposes of including land within it;
● the extension or alteration of a building provided that it does not result in
disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original building;
● the replacement of a building, provided the new building is in the same
use and not materially larger than the one it replaces;
● limited infilling in villages, and limited affordable housing for local
community needs under policies set out in the Local Plan; or
● limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of previously
developed sites (brownfield land), whether redundant or in continuing use
(excluding temporary buildings), which would not have a greater impact
on the openness of the Green Belt and the purpose of including land
within it than the existing development.
Certain other forms of development are also not inappropriate in Green Belt
provided they preserve the openness of the Green Belt and do not conflict
with the purposes of including land in Green Belt. These are:
● mineral extraction;
● engineering operations;
● local transport infrastructure which can demonstrate a requirement for a
Green Belt location;
● the re-use of buildings provided that the buildings are of permanent and
substantial construction; and
● development brought forward under a Community Right to Build Order.
When located in the Green Belt, elements of many renewable energy projects
will comprise inappropriate development. In such cases developers will need
to demonstrate very special circumstances if projects are to proceed. Such
very special circumstances may include the wider environmental benefits
associated with increased production of energy from renewable sources.
Community Forests offer valuable opportunities for improving the
environment around towns, by upgrading the landscape and providing for
recreation and wildlife. An approved Community Forest plan may be a
material consideration in preparing development plans and in deciding
planning applications. Any development proposals within Community Forests
in the Green Belt should be subject to the normal policies controlling
development in Green Belts.”
At the meeting Officers said that a transport assessment would need be carried out.