RIGA STRADIN'S UNIVERSITY Inese Folkmane INFLUENCE OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY ON - HERPESVIRUSES INFECTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS (SPECIALITY-NEPHROLOGY) A Summary of Doctoral Thesis Supervisors of the research study: Habilitated Doctor of Medicine, Professor Rafail Rosental Habilitated Doctor of Biology Svetlana Chapenko Riga - 2004 Introduction In the last decade several new potent immunosuppressive drugs have been introduced in renal transplantation. Although these drugs work more selectively on the immune system, opportunistic infections continue to produce serious complications. The herpesviruses involved in infectious complications of the posttransplant period represent an important cause of morbidity and even mortality after renal transplantation [Gerna, 2002]. The human -herpesviruses comprise the cytomegalovirus (CMV), and the closely related human herpesviruses 6 and 7 (HHV-6, HHV-7). The viruses are ubiquitous and can be reactivated from latency in a period of immunosuppression. Assessment of the contribution of each virus in posttransplant complications is difficult due to their concurrent infection as well as their possible simultaneous reactivation after organ transplantation. CMV is the known pathogen in posttransplant complications with well-documented clinical spectrum of the active infection. The role of HHV-6 and HHV-7 in the pathogenesis of posttransplant complications was evaluated differently [Osman et al, 1996; Griffits et al. 1997]. The additional investigations are necessary to evaluate the role of new immunosuppressive drugs (and combined drug regimens) on the activation of each virus as well as on the interaction between the viruses in order to make early and exact diagnosis of -herpesvirus infections and to improve the patient and graft survival. The research has been elaborated at the Laboratory of Transplantation, Riga Stradin's University; at the Latvian Transplantation Centre, P. Stradin's Clinical University hospital and August Kirchenstein Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Department of Oncovirology, University of Latvia, within the period of 1999 to 2003. Supervisors of the research study: Habilitated Doctor of Medicine, Professor l Rafail Rosental - Head of the Latvian Transplantation Centre, P. Stradin's Clinical University Hospital, Head of Laboratory of Transplantology, Riga Stradin's University and Habilitated Doctor of Biology, Svetlana Chapenko - senior research worker at the August Kirchenstein Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Department of Oncovirology, University of Latvia. Significance and urgency of the study Renal transplantation (RT) with appropriate immunosuppression is a choice method in the treatment of patients with end-stage renal failure. The clinical development of new immunosuppressive agents represents one of the most significant events in the field of organ transplantation today. Up-to-date immunosuppression has reduced the number and severity of acute rejections and improved the early patients' and graft survival. However, as well as offering many advantages, the potential risk of drug-related over-immunosuppression (immunodeficiency), in the daily practice of IS therapy, continues to be of significant clinical concern. Infections are and still remain the most common complications after RT. Today, serious infectious complications develop in 15-44% of RT recipients within the first year of surgery [Soulilou et al, 2001]. Bacterial infections are no longer the common mortal problem they once were. Rarely is a patient lost from opportunistic bacterial infection, unless the patient has a viral pneumonia with superinfection or has been given excessive antibody or bone marrow toxic immunosuppression. The immunomodulating viruses particularly CMV, but also Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), other human herpes viruses, hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), if present, are still major problems [R.A. Sells, 1998]. CMV has major implications on the outcome of RT due to so called "direct" tissue injury and clinical disease as well as "indirect" effects - as additional opportunistic infections, increased graft rejection, decreased long-term patient survival and finally, increased costs of transplantation [Paya, 2001]. Less is known about the role of the more recently identified HHV-6 and HHV-7 on the posttransplant viral infection complications and the role of these viruses as helper viruses in the development of CMV disease [Kidd et al, 2000; DesJardin et al, 1998 ]. Different forms of immunosuppression used in organ transplantation affect different aspects of viral infection; antilymphocyte antibodies as well as pulse steroids enhance viral activation from latency, whereas corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors and rapamycin promote the persistence and spread of virus by suppressing the host's antiviral immune responses [Rubin, 2001; Jamil et al, 2000]. There have been widely varying results with regard to -herpesvirus infections in subjects given mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and little information about new anti-interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibodies basiliximab (chimeric anti-CD25specific murine antibody) and dclizumab (human lgG1 monoclonal antibody consisting of 90% human and 10% murine amino acid sequences). Latvian Transplantation Centre performs about 60-65 kidney transplantations per year. Postoperative therapy includes almost all combinations of immunosuppressants. One year patient survival is 92% and one year graft survival is 85%. The most patients (54%) experience no rejection episodes; whereas, side-effects and toxicity are common, and the risk of infections, particularly CMV infection (15%), increases with all standard immunosuppressive regimens, -herpesvirus infections are very urgent in Latvia. It has been shown before that latent CMV, HHV-6 and HHV-7 infections are highly prevalent among the healthy blood donors in Latvia [Kozireva et al, 2001]. At the same time the prevalence, activation as well as the influence of -herpesviruses infection on renal transplant patients are studied insufficiently and the observed effects of viral activation against an immunosuppression background differ between the transplantation centres. The additional investigations are necessary to evaluate the role of new immunosuppressive drugs (and combined drug regimens) on the activation of each virus as well as on the interaction between the viruses in order to make early and exact diagnosis of (3-herpesviruses infection and to improve the patient and graft survival. Aim of the study The research aim is to evaluate the influence of different immunosuppressive therapy protocols on -herpesviruses activation in renal transplant recipients in order to improve the outcome of renal transplantation. Tasks of the study: 1. To investigate donors and recipients before and after renal transplantation for 6-herpesvirus infection prevalence. 2. To evaluate the role of latent infection as well as donor factor for the develop ment of CMV disease. 3. To analyze -herpesvirus infection upon different immunosuppressive proto cols accentuating new immunosuppressive drugs like mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, daclizumab. 4. To determine the activation and interaction of -herpesviruses upon antirejection therapy. 5. To analyze the influence of -herpesviruses infection on renal transplant func tion as well as on short -term graft survival. Novelty, scientific and practical importance of the study 1. The first time the activation, interaction and role of recently discovered herpesviruses (HHV-6 and HHV-7) in the development of post-transplant complications were assessed. 2. The first time the activation of -herpesviruses as well as severity of viral disease were studied with regard to application of new immunosuppressive drugs like mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, daclizumab. 3. The new and very sensitive molecular method - nested polymerase chain reaction (n PCR) was used for detection of latent and active CMV, HHV-6 and HHV-7. 4. The obtained results will permit to elaborate optimal immunosuppressive pro tocols, decreasing the rate and severity of viral disease as well as increasing the patient and graft survival thereby improving quality of life. Presentation of the study results The study results were reported: at the European Society for Clinical Virology Winter Meeting in Rotterdam, the Netherlands (1999), International Symposium "MMF in renal transplantation" in Riga, Latvia (1999), XI European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases in Istanbul, Turkey (2001), V Congress of the Polish Transplantation Society in Mikolajki, Poland (2001), II World Latvian Scientists' Congress in Riga, Latvia (2001), International Congress on Transplantology - "A Transplant Odyssey" in Istanbul, Turkey (2001), Conference of Tutors and Researchers of the Riga Stradin's University in Riga, Latvia (2002), Rapamune Baltic Meeting in Vienna, Austria (2002), XXI Congress of the Scandinavian Transplantation Society in Reykjavik, Iceland (2002), Russian Congress on Transplantolagy and artificial organs in Moscow, Russia (2002), The International Rapamune Expierence Meeting in Riga, Latvia (2003). Posters on the subject were demonstrated: at the IV International Conference on New Trends in Clinical and Experimental Immunosuppression in Geneva, Switzerland (2000), XX Congress of the Scandinavian Transplantation Society in Helsinki, Finland (2000), XII International Congress of Virology, Paris, France (2002), Conference of Tutors and Researchers of the Riga Stradin's University in Riga, Latvia (2003), VI International Conference on New Trends in Immunosuppression in Salzburg, Austria (2004). The Thesis volume is 82 pages computer text, containing introduction, description of the topic importance, formulation of the work aim and tasks, literature review, description of material, methods and results, discussion and references. The thesis contains 15 tables and 11 figures. Subjects and Methods A total of 71 patients of both genders who underwent their first or second cadaveric RT in the Transplantation Centre of Latvia during 1997 - 2000 were studied. Mean age of recipients was 43.4±14.2 years (range 15 to 70 years). Cohorts were established with the approval of the local Ethics Committee and, prior to their examination, all participants provided informed consent. EDTA anticoagulated peripheral blood and serum samples from the patients were collected before transplantation and weekly thereafter for a minimum of 12 weeks. Plasma/serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were processed on the day of collection and then stored at - 70° C. Further the characterization of subjects for each clinical study will be given separately. 1. Primary CMV infection and dual (CMV and HHV-7) -herpesviruses infection as an increased risk factor for CMV disease in patients undergoing renal transplantation The study included 49 patients who underwent first RT. Each patient received an intravenous injection of methylprednisolone (Pharmacia&Upjon) up to 500 mg on the day of transplantation (day 0), which was tapered gradually within the four days postoperatively as well as maintenance conventional triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine A (CsA), azathioprine (Aza) and prednisolon (P). Oral CsA (Sandimun Neoral, Novartis) was initiated immediately after the transplant operation and adjusted based on target trough levels (at 150-350 ng/ml during the first four weeks and at 150 to 250 ng/ml for the remainder of the study). Oral steroids (Prednisolon, Gedeon Richter) were started on day 1 at 0.5 mg/kg/ per day and tapered to a minimal dose of 10-5 mg/day until month 12. The maintenance dosage of orally administered azathioprine (Imuran, Glaxo Wellcome) was 1-2 mg/kg/ per day. Acute rejection (AR) episodes were treated with intavenous injection of 500 mg of methylprednisolone for three to five days followed by a return to the preepisode dose of steroids. Steroid-resistant and severe cellular or vascular AR episodes were subsequently treated with policlonal antibodies - anithymocyte globulin (ATG; Fresenius) 4 mg/kg/ per day for 10 to 14 days. 2. Activation of dual -herpesviruses (CMV and HHV-7) after kidney transplantation with MMF-based maintenance immunosuppression The study included 48 patients who underwent first cadaveric kidney transplantation. Kidney recipients were randomized and compared in 2 different maintenance immunosuppressive therapy protocols. The group I (n=24) received conventional triple immunosuppressive therapy (Aza+P+CsA), the group II (n=24) received MMF-based triple therapy (MMF+P+CsA). MMF (CellCept; Hoffman-La Roche) medication was fixed doses of 0.75 -1 g b.i.d. Rejections were treated by i.v. methylprednisolone 5mg/kg for 5 days. No induction therapy with policlonal or monoclonal antibodies was applied. No prophylaxis with ganciclovir was applied for "CMV at risk" recipients. 3. Concurrent -herpesviruses (CMV, HHV-6, HHV-7) infection and antirejection therapy: role in viral disease development in renal transplant recipients 50 patients of both genders who underwent their first cadaveric RT were reviewed retrospectively. To analyze viral infection complications upon antirejection treatment and with regard to type of viral infection (concurrent viral infection or viral infection alone) the recipients were grouped in three groups and compared to receive either conventional therapy (group I, n=20) or MMF-based triple therapy (group II, n=21) or besides maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy received high doses of steroids ("pulse" steroids) and polyclonal antibodies - ATG (group III, n=9) due to AR or as induction therapy. The group I was also control group. Patient demographic characteristics showed no significant differences between the groups. 4. Results of renal transplantation with different immunosuppressive regimens (MMF- based triple therapy and induction with IL-2R monoclonal antibodies) The study included 71 patients of both genders who underwent first or second cadaveric RT. Patients were divided into three groups according treatment after RT. The group I (n=25) received conventional triple CsA-based therapy (CsA, AzA.P), the group II (n=23) received MMF-based triple therapy (CsA, MMF, P) and the group III (n=23) received induction with basiliximab (Simulect; Novartis) or daclizumab (Zenapax; Roche) and background triple immunosuppressive therapy (CsA, P, Aza). The first of the two 20 mg doses of basiliximab was performed immediately before transplant surgery and the second dose was administered on day 4 after RT. The first dose of daclizumab was administered at a dosage 2mg/ kg/d i.v. immediately before transplant surgery and the second dose (1mg/kg/d) at 2-week interval. All the rest immunosuppressants were applied accordingly the above mentioned studies. Methods Hematologic parameters (RBC count and hemoglobin concentration; hematokrit; erythrocyte qualitative parameters) were determined on the hematologic analyser Cell-Dyn 1700 (Abbot Laboratories, USA). Blood biochemical tests (plasma creatinine; plasma urea; plasma phosphorus; plasma potassium; plasma sodium; plasma calcium) was used biochemical analyzer Abbot Spectrum Series II (Abbot Laboratories, USA), where to quantitatively estimate concentrations of various substances in plasma, determination of light absorption level by different length waves was done. The Cyclosporine A through blood level was determined on AxSYM autoanalyzer (Abbot Laboratories, USA) using immune fluorescence polarization technique. The diagnosis of the latent CMV, HHV-6, and HHV-7 infection was based on detection of sequences in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) by nPCR. Latent CMV infection was affirmed by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for anti-CMV IgG and anti-CMV IgM (Imx, Abbot) in serum. The diagnosis of an active CMV infection was based on CMV serology (seroconvertion or 4-fold increase of IgG titer), on the detection of viral DNA sequence in blood plasma by nPCR and identification of the virus in blood by inoculation of PBL onto monolayer MRC-5 cell culture (cytopathic effect [CPE], the presence of CMV antigens detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay [IFA], the presence of specific DNA in cell culture fractions), as well as on clinical signs. The active HHV-6 and HHV-7 infections were determined by the presence of viral DNA in blood plasma using nPCR and by the identification of viruses in cell cocultures of PBMC from recipients with umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells (CPE, IFA, nPCR). Acute rejection episodes were diagnosed on the basis of an otherwise unexplained rise in serum creatinine greater than 25% from baseline together with clinical evidence and improvement within 3 days after the initiation of empiric antirejection therapy. In the vast majority of patients the diagnosis was confirmed on graft biopsy. Histological examination and classification of a core biopsy was done according to the Banff 1993 scheme [Solez K, et al. 1993]. CMV infection and disease were defined as outlined by previous international CMV workshops [Proceedings from the 5th International Cytomegalovirus Conference. 1995]. 10 Statistics The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage. Paired and unpaired Student's f-test for comparisons between and within groups or Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables respectively, were used. Results of Cox proportional analyses were expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. The threshold of statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results and discussion 1. Primary CMV infection and dual (CMV and HHV-7) -herpesviruses infection as an increased risk factor for CMV disease in patients undergoing renal transplantation Before RT latent -herpesviruses infection was detected in 44 of 49 (89.8%) patients and from them CMV infection in 26.5%, HHV-7 - 12.2% and dual (CMV and HHV-7) infection in 51% of patients (Table 1). Tablei. Latent -herpesviruses infection before and at 6 months after RT Only 5 of 49 (10.2%) patients were free of -herpesviruses infection. As shown in Table 1, the latent dual infection was prevalent in patients before RT. After RT, CMV infection alone was determined in 15 out of 49 (30.6%) recipients and 2 of them had primary infection (Table 1). The number of recipients with HHV7 infection alone (12.2%) and with dual infection (51,0%) remained unchanged after RT. Three recipients, who were negative for CMV and HHV-7 infection before and after RT, had no post-transplantation complications. Viral disease was clinically diagnosed in 18 out of 49 (36.7%) recipients. The risk of the viral disease in recipients was calculated depending on the type of latent viral infection (Table 2). The results showed that the risk of disease for recipients with dual infection was 3.6 and 2.2-fold higher in comparison with CMV infection and HHV-7 infection alone, respectively. Table 2. The risk of the viral disease depending on the type of latent viral infection *P< 0,01, the risk of the viral disease in recipients with dual -herpesviruses infection vs. CMV and HHV-7 infection alone. The data, indicating that dual infection is an increased risk factor for the development of viral disease, were confirmed by the results of the investigation of 18 recipients with viral disease after RT. CMV infection alone was revealed in 3 (16.7%), HHV-7 infection alone in 2 (11.1%) and dual infection in 13 (72.2%) recipients (Table 3). Frequency of dual infection in recipients with viral disease was feasibly higher than CMV and HHV-7 infection alone (P<0.025). To determine the time of reactivation of each virus and the association of their reactivation with the development of the disease, 18 recipients with viral disease were divided into 3 groups (A, B, C) depending on the type of the viral infection (CMV, HHV-7, CMV+HHV-7). The results of virological and serological examination for the recipients with viral disease after RT are presented in Table 3. Primary CMV infection and reinfection with donor virus are known predictors for the development of CMV disease in transplant recipients [Chou S, 1986; Grundy et al, 1988]. In the present study, the severe CMV disease had developed in 2 recipients with CMV primary infection and viral syndrome in 1 recipient with latent CMV infection (group A), although these recipients were not treated with ATG. Activation of CMV was detected in all recipients prior to onset of the disease. 13 Table 3. The results of virological and serological examination for the recipients with viral disease after RT D, donor; R, recipient; PBL, peripheral blood leukocytes; VS, viral syndrome; "+", positive result;"-", negative result; +*, 4-fold rise of specific CMV IgG antibody titer increase; ND, not detected 14 Anti-rejection therapy with monoclonal (OKT3) and polyclonal (ATG) antibodies is now recognized as a major risk factor for CMV reactivation and development of CMV disease in the CMV-seropositive recipients [Morris, 1996]. Four recipients treated with ATG had reactivation of -herpesviruses (HHV-7 - in the case of HHV-7 infection alone; CMV and HHV-7 - in the case of dual infection). Reactivation of viruses preceded the development of viral disease, which was diagnosed in all 4 recipients. The significance of HHV-7 in the development of post-transplantation infectious complications is not determined so far. A relationship between identification of HHV-7 DNA in plasma and CMV disease has been shown [Tong et al, 2000] and evidence suggests that this herpesvirus have indirect effect such as contributing to the risk of opportunistic infections. Our study showed the correlation between reactivation of latent HHV-7 after RT and development of febrile syndrome in both recipients with HHV-7 infection alone (group B). The appearance and duration of febrile syndrome coincided with the time when viral DNA was detectable in blood plasma. Thus, our study showed the association of virus reactivation with viral disease in the cases of CMV and HHV-7 infections alone. A total of 51.0% of patients had latent dual (CMV+HHV-7) infection before RT. Our investigation demonstrated that, after RT, the risk of viral disease was 3.6 and 2.2-fold higher in patients with latent dual infection in comparison with latent CMV or latent HHV-7 infection alone, respectively (P<0.025). The virulogical monitoring revealed reactivation of both viruses in 100% of recipients with dual infection and development of viral disease after RT. However, HHV-7 reactivation preceded CMV reactivation in 77.0% cases and was not related to the treatment by ATG. These data coincide with the results of Osman et al [Osman et al, 1996 ], 15 who also noted that HHV-7 reactivation preceded the CMV reactivation in the post-transplantation period. After reactivation, HHV-7 might enhance the state of immunodeficiency due to its selective tropism to CD4+ T lymphocytes [Secchiero et al, 1997], or might alter cytokine profile [Ongradi et al, 1999] and thus create conditions for CMV reactivation. 2. Activation of dual - herpesviruses (CMV and HHV-7) after kidney transplantation with MMF-based maintenance immunosuppression The study included 48 patients. The patients were randomized and compared in 2 different maintenance immunosuppressive therapy protocols. The group I (n=24) received conventional triple immunosuppressive therapy - control group, the group II (n=24) received MMF-based triple immunosuppressive therapy. The 2 groups were matched for age, sex, donor and recipient pretransplant CMV serological status and treatment of steroid-pulse therapy. Before RT the presence of CMV, HHV-7 and CMV+HHV-7 DNA sequences were detected in PBL, but not in the plasma samples of 50.0%, 29.1% and 37.5% of group I patients and of 58.3%, 33.3% and 29.1% of group II patients, respectively, that indicates the presence of latent, but not active virus infection in these patients. After RT number of recipients with latent -herpesviruses infection were higher than before one. It was made 58.3% for CMV infection alone and 41.6% for dual (CMV+HHV-7) infection in group I and 66.6% and 33.3% in group II, respectively. During the 6 - months observation period after RT viral activation as well as the risk of viral activation upon different immunosuppressive protocols was analyzed (Table 4). 16 Table 4. Activation of CMV and dual -herpesviruses (CMV and HHV-7) as well as risk of virus activation in recipients with different immunosuppression at 6 months after RT A considerably higher incidence of CMV and dual infection activation was observed in recipients with MMF-based therapy (62.5% and 75% vs. 28.5% and 30%, P<0.05). The risk of CMV and dual b- herpesviruses activation was 4.0 and 7.5-fold higher, respectively, in group II as compare to group I (P<0.05). The patients were also evaluated in terms of the incidence and severity of viral disease in recipients with CMV infection alone and with dual infection in both groups (Figure 1). 17 Figure 1. The characteristics of viral disease in recipients with CMV infection alone and with dual (CMV+HHV-7) b- herpesviruses infection depending on immunosuppressive therapy. *P<0,01, the frequency of CMV tissue-invasive disease in recipients with CMV infection alone in group II vs. control group; **P<0,001, the frequency of CMV tissue- invasive disease in recipients with dual b- herpesviruses infection in group II vs. control group. Viral disease was clinically diagnosed in 4 of 14 (28.5%) recipients with CMV infection alone and in 3 of 10 (30%) recipients with dual b- herpesviruses infection in control group (Figure 1). Accordingly, viral disease was clinically diagnosed in 10 of 16 (62.5%) recipients with CMV infection alone and in 6 of 8 (75%) recipients with dual (3-herpesviruses infection in MMF-based group. Also the clinical signs of viral disease tended to be more severe in patients treated with MMFbased immunosuppression (incidence of tissue-invasive disease in 37% of 18 recipients with CMV infection alone and in 50% of recipients with dual b- herpesviruses infection ), whereas, in the control group, CMV tissue-invasive disease was not diagnosed at all (P<0.001). There have been widely varying results with regard to viral infectious complications in subjects given MMF. One study [Tricontinental MMF Renal Study group, 1996] showed that a patient group receiving 2 mg/d MMF had no increased incidence of tissue-invasive CMV infection. Our results showed statistically significant increasing of active of CMV infection alone and dual B-herpesviruses infection (62.5% and 75%) in recipients with MMF-based immunosuppression as compare to conventional treatment group (28.5% and 30%), as well as more severe clinical signs of viral disease (tissue invasive disease in 37.5% and in 50% recipients, respectively) in recipients with MMF-based immunosuppression as compare to conventional treatment group (P<0.001). The similar results have receantly been reported by others [Land, 1999; Meulen et al, 2000]. However, more frequently tissue-invasive CMV disease is associated with dose of 3g/d MMF [ Moreso et al, 1998], we found, that even dose of 2g/d of MMF creates conditions for activation of -herpesviruses and promotes recipients to more severe clinical signs of viral disease. A fixed-dose regimen of 2 g/d MMF may be excessive. 3. Concurrent -herpesviruses (CMV, HHV-6, HHV-7) infection and antirejection therapy: role in viral disease development in renal transplant recipients 50 patients of both genders who underwent their first cadaveric RT were reviewed retrospectively. Before RT latent/persistent -herpesviruses infection was disclosed in 44 of 50 (88%) patients (Figure 2). The concurrent latent/persistent 19 -herpesviruses infection was diagnosed in 29 of 50 (58%) patients (dual CMV +HHV-6 infection - 2/50 , 4%, dual CMV +HHV-7 infection - 13/50, 26%, dual HHV-6+HHV-7 infection - 2/50, 4% and triple CMV+HHV-6+HHV-7 infection 12/50, 24%). The concurrent latent/persistent -herpesviruses infection was more prevalent (58%) in comparison with viral infection alone, that was diagnosed in 15 of 50 (30%) patients (CMV -11/50, 22%; HHV-7 - 4/50 8%; HHV-6 - 0/50, 0%) (P=0.008) before RT (Figure 2). Figure 2. Prevalence of latent/persistent 6-herpesviruses infection in the patients before and after RT (nPCR results), *P= 0,008, prevalence of concurrent pherpesviruses infection vs. viral infection alone before RT; #P= 0,0005, prevalence of concurrent -herpesviruses infection vs. viral infection alone after RT. After RT the percent of recipients with latent/persistent -herpesviruses infection increased to 92% (46/50) (Figure 2). Four recipients (8%), who remained free from -herpesviruses infection, the viral disease complications did not develop within the first 6 months after RT. The concurrent latent/persistent -herpesviruses 20 infection was significantly prevalent also after RT as compared to viral infection alone (64% vs. 28%, P=0.005). Viral disease was clinically diagnosed in 22 of 50 recipients (44%). In seventeen recipients with viral disease, concurrent (-herpesviruses infection was diagnosed, in 3 - CMV infection alone and in 2 recipients - HHV-7 alone. The risk of the viral disease was calculated depending on the type of viral infection (Table 5). Our results showed that the risk of viral disease for the recipients with concurrent -herpesviruses infection was feasibly higher, 4.46 (95% Cl: 0.87 - 6.95), in comparison with CMV infection alone, 0.45 (95% Cl: 0.16 -1.27) (P=0.045). Table 5. Risk of the development of viral disease in recipients with either viral infection alone or concurrent -herpesviruses infection *P=0,045, the risk of the development of viral disease in recipients with concurrent -herpesviruses infection in comparison with CMV infection alone To analyze viral disease complications upon antirejection treatment the recipients were compared to receive either conventional therapy (group I) or MMFbased triple therapy (group II) or besides maintenance triple immunosuppressive 21 therapy received high doses of steroids and polyclonal antibodies - ATG (group III) due to AR or as induction therapy. The analysis of post-transplant complications (Table 6) depending on the type of immunosuppressive treatment showed that frequency of viral disease was considerably higher in group II (13/21, 62%) and in group III (7/9, 78%) patients, who received more potent immunosuppressive drugs - MMF and ATG in comparison to patients who received conventional therapy (4/20, 20%) (P=0.01). Also frequency of viral disease complications was 3-fold higher in patients with concurrent -herpesviruses infection (3/4, 75%) in comparison to patients with -herpesviruses infection alone (1/4, 25%) in group I. Statistically significantly higher rate of viral disease complications was disclosed in group II patients with concurrent -herpesviruses infection as compare to viral infections alone (85% vs. 15%, P=0.001) (Table 6). 22 Table 6. The viral disease complications depending on the type of (herpesviruses infection (concurrent -herpesviruses infection or viral infection alone) and immunosuppressive treatment *P=0,01, the frequency of viral disease complications in group II and III patients vs. control group; **P=0,001, the frequency of viral disease complications in group II recipients with concurrent (-herpesviruses infection vs. viral infection alone. The similar tendency was observed in group III where viral disease complications developed in 71.4% of recipients with concurrent herpesviruses infection vs. 28.6% of recipients with viral infection alone (Table 6). CMV is the known pathogen in posttransplant complications with welldocumented clinical spectrum of the active infection. The role of HHV-6 and HHV-7 in the pathogenesis of posttransplant complications was evaluated differently 23 [Paya, 2001; Dockrell et al, 2001]. Our study showed that concurrent herpesviruses infection was prevalent in patients before (58%) and after (64%) RT. The risk of development of viral disease was significantly higher by concurrent infection (4.46) in comparison with CMV infection alone (0.45) (P=0.045). Also higher rate of viral disease complications was disclosed in MMF-treated recipients with concurrent -herpesviruses infection as compared to viral infections alone (85% vs. 15%, P=0.001). Taking into account that concurrent -herpesviruses infection is an increased risk factor for the development of complications in recipients after RT, screening diagnosis should include also testing for CMV, HHV-6, and HHV-7 infections in recipients before and after RT as well as in donors. 4. Results of renal transplantation with different immunosuppressive regimens (MMF- based triple therapy and induction with IL-2R monoclonal antibodies) The study included 71 patients of both genders who underwent their first or second cadaveric RT. To assess the efficacy (graft survival, the incidence of acute rejection and CMV disease rate) of three different immunosuppressive regimens up to 12 months post RT, the patients were divided into three groups according immunosuppressive treatment (group I - conventional therapy, control; group II MMF- based therapy and group III - induction therapy). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between treatment groups with the exception of mean age of patients of the control group - it was 45.1±13.0 and significantly higher than the mean age of MMF and induction therapy groups (40.6±13.2 and 39.8±10.4;P=0.05). The comparative criteria of the efficacy of 3 immunosuppressive treatment regimens are presented in Figure 3. The functional survival rates of the renal 24 allograft up to 12 months after transplantation for 3 treatment regimens groups were similar - 88% in group 1,91% - in group II and III, respectively. Figure 3. The comparative criteria of the efficacy (graft survival, the incidence of acute rejection and CMV disease rate) of three different immunosuppressive regimens up to 12 months post RT. *P<0,05, the incidence of acute rejection in group III vs. control group; #P<0,05, the incidence of CMV disease in group II vs. control group and group III. The incidence of AR within 12 months after RT was 8 of 25 (32%) in the control group; 5 of 23 (21.7%) in the group II and 4 of 23 (17.3%) in the group III, respectively. There were significantly fewer AR episodes in group III than in control group (17.3% vs. 32%, P=0.05) whereas the difference between AR episodes in group II and III was not significant (Figure 3). Further, we concentrate on the CMV results because the rate of CMV infection may be a more sensitive marker for overimmunosuppression than the overall rate of infections. The effect of two immunosuppressive regimens against a 25 background of conventional immunosuppressive therapy on the incidence and nature of CMV infections is depicted in Figure 4. Figure 4. The effect of two immunosuppressive regimens against a background of conventional immunosuppressive therapy on the incidence and nature of CMV infections. *P<0,05, the incidence of CMV disease in group II vs. control group and group III; #P<0,05, tissue invasive CMV disease in group II vs. control group and group III. In MMF group, there were more frequent incidence of CMV disease as well as more severe clinical signs of CMV disease: five (21.7%) cases of tissue invasive CMV disease vs. one (4.3%) case of tissue invasive CMV disease in control group and induction therapy group (P<0.05). CMV syndrome was clinically diagnosed in 2 of 25 patients in control group, in 4 of 23 patients in group II and in group III. There was no significant difference among the groups. The effect of CMV disease on graft function during the early period as well as at 12 months after RT was assessed, as well. The mean serum creatinine of 26 recipients with CMV disease in three immunosuppressive therapy groups at 1, 3, 6,9, and 12 months after RT is given in Figure 5. Figure 5. The mean serum creatinine of recipients with CMV disease in three immunosuppressive therapy groups at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after RT. *P<0,05, the mean serum creatinine in control group vs. group II and III. The mean serum creatinine level in patients with CMV disease during the first 6 months after RT was significantly higher (0,22±0,08 mmol/l) in control group as compared to group II (0,14±0,03 mmol/l) and group III (0,1510,06 mmol/l) patients, P<0.05. At 12 months after RT, no further deterioration of graft function was noted in patients with CMV disease and the mean serum creatinine level was similar in all three groups (group I - 0,17±0,06 mmol/l, group II - 0,11±0,05 mmol/l, group III - 0,13±0,06 mmol/l). Differences in creatinine values among the study groups most likely reflect the fact that the control group experienced more episodes of AR compared to group II and group III. The mean serum creatinine level for patients without previous CMV disease is given in Figure 6. At one month after RT, the mean serum creatinine for patients 27 without previous CMV disease was significantly lawer, particularly in contol group, (0.22±0.07 mmol/l) than those with CMV disease (0.3±0.09 mmol/l). At the same time, the mean serum creatinine for both patients (with CMV disease and without CMV disease) within three treatment groups did not differ at 12 months after RT (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Figure 6. The mean serum creatinine for recipients without CMV disease in three immunosuppressive therapy groups at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after RT. * P<0,05, the mean serum creatinine in control group vs. group II and III. Our data demonstrates that the no deterioration of graft function was observed in patients with CMV disease and the mean serum creatinine was not significantly different from those without CMV disease at 12 months after RT. This suggests that the major effect of CMV disease on graft function occurred during the early period after RT, however our data cannot distinguish between AR increasing the likelihood of subsequent infection, or CMV infection increasing the risk of AR. None of the patients in this study was lost due to CMV disease complications. 28 The balance between AR and infection after transplantation continues to be of significant clinical concern, especially during the early posttransplantation period [Nashan et al, 1999]. The recent introduction of several new and effective immunosuppressive agents may allow the utilization of immunosuppressive regimens that are effective and less broadly toxic. In our study we compared two potent immunosuppressive regimens (MMF-based triple therapy and quadruple induction protocol with new monoclonal antibodies - basiliximab or daclizumab) with conventional triple therapy. The one-year graft survival rate was excellent in all treatment groups. The incidence of AR episodes was significantly lower in group II! recipients than in control group (17% vs. 32%, P<0.05). None of the patients in groups II and III experienced severe, grade III AR or steroid-resistant AR, whereas, 3 vascular type AR episodes occurred in control group. Another situation was with regard to CMV infection complications under different immunosuppressive protocols. Significantly frequent and severe CMV disease complications (P<0.05) were observed in MMF group (39.1%) as compared to the control group (12%) and the induction therapy group (17.3%).This is consistent with a recent studies of association of MMF-based immunosuppressive protocols with higher rate of CMV disease [Kuypers et al, 2002]. 29 Conclusions 1. The concurrent latent -herpesviruses infection is prevalent in patients before and after RT. 2. The clinical signs of the viral disease are more severe in recipients with primary CMV infection (D+/R-) than in recipients with the reactivation of CMV. 3. In recipients with concurrent dual -herpesviruses infection (CMV+HHV7), the HHV-7 reactivation precedes CMV reactivation and this reactivation take place before the onset of the clinical symptoms of the disease. 4. The risk of viral disease for the recipients with concurrent herpesviruses infection is 10-fold higher (4.46), in comparison with CMV infection alone (0.45). 5. The immunosuppressive protocols based on MMF and concurrent 0herpesviruses infection are associated with increased incidence of CMV disease as well as with more severe clinical signs of CMV disease in recipients after RT. 6. Addition of MMF to cyclosporine and prednisolone as well as induction therapy protocols with IL-2R monoclonal antibodies can provide excellent 1-year graft survivals and a low incidence of AR episodes. 7. The combination of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids with IL-2R monoclonal antibodies is a highly effective immunosuppressive protocol that greatly reduces the incidence of AR and does not associate with an increased risk of CMV disease within 12 months after RT. 8. The presence of CMV disease within 6 months after RT does not associate with poor graft function and patients survival at 12 months. 30 Practical recommendations 1. Taking into account that concurrent -herpesviruses infection is an in creased risk factor for the development of complications in recipients after RT, screening diagnosis should include also testing for CMV, HHV-6, and HHV-7 infections in recipients before and after RT as well as in donors. 2. In recipients with latent concurrent -herpesviruses infection prophylactic antiviral therapy with ganciclovir would be advisable, and an immunosuppressive drug regimen that is less prone to viral disease (induction therapy protocols with IL-2R monoclonal antibodies or MMF-based triple immunosuppression with reduced MMF dose) would be chosen. 3. Quadruple induction immunosuppressive protocol with IL-2R monoclonal antibodies (in combination with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids) would be applied for older recipients, and for CMV high risk recipients (D+/R-) 31 The list of publications Original articles 1. I. Folkmane, J. Bicāns, B. Bērziņa, L. Salaka, R. Rozentāls. Post-transplant diabetes melllitus after kidney transplantation. Acta medica Lituanica. 1999. Suppl. 4, pp. 27-29. Vilnius ACADEMIA 1999 2. S.Chapenko, I.Folkmane,V.Tomsone, D.Amerika, M. Murovska, R. Rozental. Co-infection of two betta- herpesviruses (CMV and HHV-7) as a risk factor for CMV disease in patients undergoing renal transplantation. Clinical Transplantation 2000:14:486-492 3. I.Folkmane, S. Chapenko, D. Amerika, J. Bicans, M. Murovska, R. Rosentals. (-herpesvirus activation after kidney transplantation with mycophenolate mofetil - based maintenance immunosuppression. Transplantation Proceedings, Vol 33, No 3, 2001, p. 2384-2385 4. S. Chapenko, I. Folkmane, V. Tomsone, S. Kozireva, J. Bicans, D. Amerika, R. Rozentals, M. Murovska. Infection of p-herpesviruses (CMV, HHV-6, HHV-7): role in post-renal transplantation complications. Transplantation Proceedings, Vol 33, No 4, 2001, p. 2463-2464 5. I.Folkmane, S. Chapenko, M. Murovska, R. Rosentals. Low rate of acute rejection and cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients with basiliximab. Transplantation Proceedings, Vol 33, No 7-8,2001, p. 3209-3210. 6.1.Folkmane, J. Bicans, S. Chapenko, M. Murovska, R. Rozentals. The results of kidney transplantation with different immunosuppressive regimens. Transplantation Proceedings, 34,2002, p. 558-559. 7.1.Folkmane, K. Bernarde, J. Bicans, D. Amerika, R. Rozentals. Benefitial effects of low-toxicity regimens with MMF in renal recipients with late allograft dysfunction.Transplantation Proceedings, 35,2003, p. 789-790 8. M. Mihailova, J. Jansons, I. Sominska, *l. Folkmane, *R. Rozentals, P. Pumpens.Structural features of hepatitis B virus from long-term immunosuppressed patients in Latvia. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B, Vol. 57 (2003). No.5, p. 158-163 32 Abstracts 1. I.Folkmane1, D.Amerika1, LSamoshenkova2, S.Chapenko3, J.Bicans1, R.Rozentals1. "Cytomegaloviais infection in patients after kidney transplantation". International Meeting "Blood borne virus infections". Radisson SAS Hotel, Riga, Latvia, May 26-27,1998. Abstract, p. 18-19. 2. S.Chapenko1, V.Tomsons1, D.Amerika2, I.Folkmane2, R.Rosentals, M.Murovska1. "A prospective study of human -herpesviruses infection in renal transplantation". International Meeting "Blood borne virus infections". Radisson SAS Hotel, Riga, Latvia, May 26-27,1998. Abstract, p. 17 3. S. Chapenko1, V. Tomsons1, I. Folkmane2, D. Amerika2, R. Rozentals2, M. Murovska1. "Activation of CMV and HHV-7 in Patients After Renal Transplantation" . ESCV Winter Meeting 1999, Rotterdam the Netherlands, 7-9 January. Abstract, p.51. 4. I. Folkmane, J. Bicans, B. Berzina, L. Salaka, R. Rozentals. Department of Transplantation, Latvian Medical Academy, Riga, Latvia. "Post-transplant diabetes melllitus after kidney transplantation". 3-rd Baltic meeting on nephrology. 23-25 April 1999, Vilnius, Lithuania. Abstract, p. 6 5. I.Folkmane1, S. Chapenko2, D. Amerika1, J. Bicans1, M. Murovska2, R. Rozental1. "-herpesviruses activation after kidney transplantation with MMFbased maintenance immunosuppression". 4th International Conference on new trends in clinical and experimental immunosuppression. Geneva, Switzerland, February 17-20,2000. Abstract, p. 194. 6. Chapenko S.1, Folkmane I.2, Tomsone V. \ Kozireva S.1,2Bicans J.2, Amerika D.2, Rozentals R.2, Murovska M.1 "Infection of p-herpesviruses (CMV, HHV-6, HHV-7): role in post-renal transplantation complications". Scandinavian Transplantation Society XX Congress. May 11-12,2000, Marina Congress Center, Helsinki, Finland. Abstract p.51. 7. S. Chapenko1, I. Folkmane2, D. Amerika2, R. Rozental2, M. Murovska1. "Importance of concurrent beta-herpesvirus infection in the development of postrenal-transplantation complications upon antirejection therapy". 11 th European Congress of Clinical Mirobiology and Infectious Diseases. Istanbul, Turky, 1-4 April, 2001. Abstract No.0115. Abstract publication in Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 7, Supplement 1, 2001 33 8. I. Folkmane1, S. Chapenko2, M. Murovska2, R. Rosentals1. "Low rate of acute rejection and cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients with basiliximab". A Transplant Odyssey. The scientific and educational congress. Istanbul, Turky, 20-23 August, 2001, Abstract, p.153. 9. I.Folkmane, K. Bemarde, J. Bicans, D. Amerika, R. Rozentals. "Benefitial effects of low-toxicity regimens with MMF in renal recipients with late allograft dysfunction".The Scandinavian Transplantation society XXI congress, May 22-24, 2002, Reykjavik, Iceland. Abstract p. 9. 10. Z. Nora1, I. Folkmane2, A. Fostiropolo1, R. Rozentals2, S. Chapenko1, M. Murovska 1 . "Human herpesvirus 5, 6, 7 and 8 as the risk factors for posttransplant complications". XII th International congress of Virology, 27th to 1st August 2002, Paris, France. Abstract, p.208 11. I.Sominskaya1, J. Jansons1, M. Mikhailova1, U. Dumpis1, I. Folkmane2, R. Rozentals2, P. Pumpens1. "Structural features of HBV and HCV infection in a patients from kidney transplantation centre". XII th International congress of Virology, 27th to 1st August 2002, Paris, France. Abstract, p.200. 12. I. Folkmane1, J. Bicans1, S. Chapenko2, M. Murovska2, K. Bernarde1, R. Rosentals1. "Influence of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive protocols on graft function and CMV infection in renal transplant patients: 12 months results". 6th international conference on new trends in immunosuppression. Salzburg, Austria, February 5-8,2004. Abstract, p.152. 34