Agenda Item No.: E.1.e. City of Edmonton Submission to 2006-07 Provincial Budget Recommendation: 1. That the proposed strategy to guide the development of the City of Edmonton’s submission to the Government of Alberta for consideration in the 2006-07 budget process be approved. 2. That the Mayor write to the Premier of Alberta requesting additional funding for allocation to the City of Edmonton’s 2006 budget as outlined in the proposed strategy. Report Summary This report proposes a strategy for Edmonton City Council’s submission to the Government of Alberta for consideration during the 2006 budget process. Previous Council/Committee Action At the November 15, 2005, City Council meeting the following motion was passed: That the report Pillars of Partnership: Maintaining and Expanding Alberta’s Advantage in the 21st Century Global Economy be referred to Executive Committee to develop a strategy to provide a submission to the provincial government that outlines a set of actions to obtain ongoing sustainable funding. Report Background In July 2005, Edmonton City Council agreed to have Administration work with City of Calgary officials on the preparation of a joint submission to the Government of Alberta’s 2006-07 budget process. Routing: Delegation: Written By: November 23, 2005 File: 2005CMO081rev Executive Committee, Council A. B. Maurer/M. Ulmer-Johnston M. Ulmer-Johnston City Manager’s Office (Page 1 of 3) Over the ensuing three months, Administration officials from the two Cities worked together to prepare a draft submission that would meet the approval of their respective City Councils. The draft submission was discussed by Edmonton City Council at their November 15, 2005, meeting. Council members concluded that the draft submission did not adequately reflect their thoughts on what the City’s main concerns are with the Government of Alberta, particularly in relation to the provincial funding of municipal priorities. As a result, the draft was referred to Executive Committee for the development of a strategy for a separate City of Edmonton submission to the provincial budget process. On several occasions over the past few months, Alberta Municipal Affairs Minister Rob Renner has stated his intent to reconvene the Minister’s Provincial/Municipal Council on Roles, Responsibilities and Resources in the 21st Century. Further, the Minister has advised that the Committee will be expanded to consider a fourth “R” – relationships – during its deliberations which are expected to begin in early 2006. Given the intricate relationship between the Province and its municipalities, it is expected the Minister’s Council may take several months, or possibly even a year, to determine and table its results with Cabinet. In the meantime, the City of Edmonton will continue to feel the pressures of growth on the provision of critical services to its citizens. Further, City of Edmonton Submission to 2006-07 Provincial Budget as it stands now, the City will have to absorb the cost increases associated with these pressures. Proposed Strategy Given the direction the Government of Alberta plans to take regarding municipal concerns, it is proposed that Edmonton City Council’s submission recognize both the short-term and the long-term. The short-term is defined as the 2006-07 provincial budget year. The long-term would include the Minister’s Council process and the resulting redefinitions of roles, responsibilities and relationships, and the reallocation of funding. Short-Term: It is suggested the shortterm strategy focus on seeking additional provincial funding for 2006 to be allocated to three Council priorities: ground ambulance services, policing, and affordable housing. The first two priorities are focused on the health and safety of the City’s citizens. The third priority responds to an important quality of life issue for the City’s less fortunate citizens. The City’s request for additional funding for 2006 should be viewed as a short term “bridge” aimed at maintaining the current level of services until the Provincial Cabinet approves the recommendations arising from the Minister’s Council (i.e. the “4R’s”) and funding reallocations have been determined. If the final report of the Minister’s Council is delayed beyond 2006, there may be a requirement for an additional “bridge” for 2007. (Page 2 of 3) Ground Ambulance Services: The Minister of Health has committed to providing the same funding allocation to the City of Edmonton for ground ambulance services in 2006-07 as was provided in 2005-06. Unfortunately, this allocation does not consider the impact of growth on the demand for services or the fact that costs for providing this service have risen over the past year. Further, the Minister’s Advisory Council on Ground Ambulance Services has not yet finalized its recommendations for a long-term funding strategy. Given these factors, it is suggested that the budget submission seek additional funding to offset the impacts of growth and inflation anticipated for 2006. Police Services: In 2005, the Government of Alberta allocated $16 per capita to the City of Edmonton to be used for police services. The total grant of $10.6 million accounts for 5.6 percent of the Edmonton Police Service (EPS) 2005 budget. In comparison, during the 1980-1993 period, the Province provided the City with annual grant funding ranging between $17 and $18.4 per capita. In 1980, this grant (known as the Law Enforcement Grant (LEG)) accounted for 20 percent of the EPS budget but by 1993 had fallen to 10 percent of the EPS budget. In 1994, the Province replaced the LEG with an unconditional municipal grant provided to the City of Edmonton as general revenue rather than specifically toward policing costs. In 2005, this annual grant of $5.3 million for the City of Edmonton was terminated and replaced with the $16 per capita grant. As a result City of Edmonton Submission to 2006-07 Provincial Budget of the removal of the unconditional municipal grant, the net increase to the EPS budget was $5.4 million, which translates into a net increase of $8 per capita. The past 25 years have seen some changes in the kind of challenges faced by the EPS as well as a substantial increase in the cost of providing police services. Unfortunately, the current $16 per capita grant allocation does not adequately respond to these concerns. It is suggested therefore that the City’s budget submission request an increase in per capita funding to help offset at least the inflationary impacts on the provision of police services. Affordable Housing: Edmonton City Council approved Cornerstones: Edmonton’s Plan for Affordable Housing 2006-2011 in July 2005. The plan recommends the City create a new funding pool with an investment of $25 million as leverage to solicit additional amounts from the other governments and non-governmental organizations with the objective of developing a lowinterest/forgivable loan pool for 2,500 additional units of affordable long-term housing in Edmonton. The 2006 recommended budget includes an allocation of $5 million as the beginning of the pool. It is suggested that the City’s budget submission for 2006-07 request the Province provide a proportion of the matching funds sought for the creation of the new funding pool. Long-term: To achieve Edmonton City Council’s long-term objective of attaining financial sustainability, it is suggested that City officials commit to work with the Province to identify and develop long-term solutions to the challenges faced by the City. This will require active participation in the Ministers Provincial/Municipal Council and any related initiatives. Budget/Financial Implications If the budget submission results in additional targeted funding, the total revenues available within the City of Edmonton 2005 budget will increase. This will provide the opportunity for a reallocation of funding among other City priorities. Justification of Recommendation (Page 3 of 3) The strategy herein responds to some of the City’s more important needs in the short-term as well as to the long-term objective of achieving financial sustainability. The Government of Alberta is nearing the end of its 2006-07 budget deliberation process therefore it is imperative that Edmonton City Council communicate its request for additional funding as quickly and effectively as possible. A letter from the Mayor will achieve this objective.