REASONS FOR DECISION TO EXERCISE POWER OF INTERVENTION UNDER SECTION 20(4) OF THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 1987 SURF COAST PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C75 The Planning and Environment Act 1987, the Heritage Act 1995 and the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 provide for the intervention of the Minister for Planning in planning and heritage processes. In exercising the Minister’s powers of intervention, including action taken under delegation from the Minister for Planning, in accordance with the Ministerial Powers of Intervention in Planning and Heritage Matters Practice Note, the Minister has agreed to: Make publicly available written reasons for each decision; and Provide a report to Parliament at least every twelve months detailing the nature of each intervention. REQUEST FOR INTERVENTION 1. The Surf Coast Shire Council has requested the intervention to expedite an amendment to the Surf Coast Planning Scheme to correct zone and overlay mapping anomalies associated with the land encompassing the Torquay Community and Civic Precinct. WHAT POWER OF INTERVENTION IS BEING USED? 2. Under delegated authority from the Minister for Planning I have decided to exercise the power to exempt the Minister from all the requirements of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 and the regulations in respect to Amendment C75 to the Surf Coast Planning Scheme. 3. Section 20(4) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 enables the Minister for Planning to exempt an amendment which the Minister prepares from any of the requirements of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act or the regulations. 4. In seeking to exercise this power, section 20(4) of the Act requires that the Minister must consider that compliance with any of those requirements is not warranted or that the interests of Victoria or any part of Victoria make such an exemption appropriate. BACKGROUND 5. The Surf Coast Shire wrote to the Minister for Planning on 11 November 2011 requesting that he use his powers of intervention to expedite the preparation, adoption and approval of Amendment C75 to the Surf Coast Planning Scheme to make the following changes: Land Current Zone Part 1160 Horseshoe Bend Residential 1 Road (Site A [3 parts] on Map Zone 1) Proposed Zone Public Park and Recreation Zone Other Corrections Delete Design and Development Overlay 1 and Development Plan Overlay 8. Part 1160 Horseshoe Bend Road (Site B on Map 1) Public Park and Residential 1 Recreation Zone Zone Apply Design and Development Overlay 1 and Development Plan Overlay 8. Part 1445 Surf Coast Highway (Site C on Map 1) Public Use Zone Public Park 6 and Recreation Zone Delete Design and Development Overlay 1 Part 1445 Surf Coast Highway (Site D on Map 1) Public Park and Public Use Recreation Zone Zone 6 Apply Design and Development Overlay 1 Part 1445 Surf Coast Highway (Site E on Map 1) Residential 1 Zone Delete Development Plan Overlay 8. Part 1445 Surf Coast Highway (Site F on Map 1) Public Use Zone Residential 1 6 Zone Public Use Zone 6 Apply Development Plan Overlay 8. 6. The changes are required to reflect the existing or designated future use of land within the Torquay Community and Civic Precinct in accordance with the Council’s approved Masterplan. 7. An inconsequential administrative amendment is required to achieve these corrections. BENEFITS OF EXEMPTION 8. The benefits of the exemption are that the Surf Coast Planning Scheme will be corrected and updated in a timely manner so that it can be properly administered to regulate use and development of land with the Torquay Community and Civic Precinct. EFFECTS OF EXEMPTION ON THIRD PARTIES 9. The effects of the exemption will be that third parties will not have the opportunity to make submissions after the preparation of the amendment, nor to be heard by an independent Panel in relation to the amendment. 10. However, as the purpose of the amendment is to apply the correct zone and overlay provisions to the affected land that has already been developed or is committed for future development as part of the Torquay Community and Civic Precinct, the exemption will not have negative effects on third parties. Rather, the effects of the exemption are considered positive as it will ensure that land use and development within the precinct can be properly administered under the Surf Coast Planning Scheme. 11. The Surf Coast Shire Council owns part of the designated Community and Civic Precinct and has advised that it has a contract with a landowner to purchase the balance of the Precinct area which is currently undeveloped land. That landowner has been informed about the proposed amendment and has advised Council of their support for the zoning and overlay changes to be made to reflect the future use and development of land as designated in the Torquay Community and Civic Precinct Masterplan. ASSESSMENT AS TO WHETHER BENEFITS OF EXEMPTIONS OUTWEIGH EFFECTS ON THIRD PARTIES 12. Having regard to the circumstances as a whole, the effects of the exemption on third parties are considered to be positive as the exemption will allow the planning scheme to be corrected in a timely manner which will in turn allow for its proper application and administration. 13. Accordingly I, acting under delegation from the Minister, consider that the benefits of exemption from sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act outweigh any effects of the exemption on third parties. DECISION 14. Under delegated authority from the Minister for Planning I have decided to exercise the power to exempt the Minister from all the requirements of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 and the regulations in respect of Amendment C75 to the Surf Coast Planning Scheme. REASONS FOR INTERVENTION 15. In accordance with the Ministerial Powers of Intervention in Planning and Heritage Matters Practice Note I provide the following reasons for my decision under delegated authority to exercise the power under section 20(4) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. 16. I, acting under delegation from the Minister, am satisfied that Compliance with any of the requirements of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Act and the regulations is not warranted because: the amendment ensures the planning scheme is up-to-date for users and efficient administration purposes by making zone and overlay mapping corrections to reflect the existing or designated future use and development of land within the Torquay Community and Civic Precinct in accordance with the Council’s approved Masterplan. Signed by the Delegate DAVID HODGE Executive Director State Planning Services and Urban Development Date: 1 March 2012