A Bidirectional CWDM-PON System with Capacity of 40-Gb/s for Metro/Access Applications Pei-Hao Tseng, and Wood-Hi Cheng Department of Photonics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan No. 70, Lienhai Rd., Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan, R.O.C Tel. (886) 7-525-2000 ext. 4450, Fax (886) 7-525-4499, E-mail: whcheng@mail.nsysu.edu.tw Abstract Using distributed feedback laser diode (DFB-LD) in a high-speed transmission system, the chirp effect in the LD is a factor limiting transmission span length. We discussed the impact of fiber chromatic dispersion on this system performance at 10-Gb/s due to LD chirp effect. For the dispersion range of -3.51 to 2.97 ps/nm·km, negative power penalties have been observed due to the pulse compression effect, which is resulted from a low chirp of DFB-LDs. We evaluated 10-Gb/s directly modulated DFB-LDs wavelengths from 1275-nm to 1350-nm of power penalties versus transmissible standard single-mode fiber (SMF) distance. The calculated power penalties are less than 1 dB for 20-km SMF transmission. Furthermore, we also achieve a bidirectional CWDM-PON system covering a wide wavelength of 1.3-μm and 1.5-μm with an aggregated data rate of 40-Gb/s is proposed and experimented. Four uncooled direct-modulated DFB-LDs with wavelengths of 1275-nm, 1300-nm, 1325-nm, and 1350-nm are adopted for the upstream transmission to lower the installation cost and dispersion effect. Another four external-modulated lasers by LiNbO3 modulators with wavelengths of 1510-nm, 1530-nm, 1550-nm, and 1570-nm are deployed for the downstream transmission to minimize the chirp effect. These lasers are operated at 10-Gb/s simultaneously for transmission over 10-km SMF. Downstream and upstream data of high capacity are operated at 10-Gb/s per channel simultaneously. This CWDM-PON network enables client’s maximum subscribing bit rate to 10Gb/s and the splitting ratio can vary from 1:4 to 1:64. 1. Introduction Passive optical networks (PONs) are attractive for the growth of broadband networks due to the high security, the protocol-independent technology, the low-cost operational feasibility, the capability of handling various services and supporting numerous subscribers [1-3]. However, WDM-PON can support a higher bandwidth, but it needs the careful wavelength control, expensive arrayed waveguide grating (AWG), and numerous optical circulators. Furthermore, the maximum subscribing bit rate of client is limited at gigabit [4 ,5]. To increase the transmission bandwidth and maintain the cost-effective performance, a coarse wavelength division multiplexing PON (CWDM-PON) has been proposed and characterized in this study. In addition, downstream channels will employ light sources consisting of externally modulated narrow-linewidth tunable CW lasers, which should be capable of transmitting hundreds of kilometers unrepeatered even in the presence of large chromatic dispersion. Due to their nearly ideal electrooptic characteristics, externally modulated 1.5-μm lasers are expected to be the technology of choice in these long unrepeatered system [6]. When using 1.5-μm wavelength chirp-free transmitter, the transmission distance at 10-Gb/s is limited to about 100-km of standard SMF due to fiber chromatic dispersion [7]. For upstream channels of 1.3-μm, the transmission distance is mainly limited by DFB-LDs optical fiber loss and chirp power penalty. The former limitation can be overcome with use of 1.3-μm semiconductor laser amplifiers [8, 9]. This proposed CWDM-PON adopts a bidirectional transmission structure with four wavelengths distributed from 1510-nm to 1570-nm for downstream channels and another four wavelengths distributed from 1275-nm to 1350-nm for upstream channels. Every channel is operated at 10-Gb/s and the aggregated data rate is symmetric 40-Gb/s for both directions in a SMF. Due to the huge investment by the industry and the matureness of 0.13-μm CMOS processes, the 10-Gb/s module has been propelled along a steep cost-volume curve. We proposed to transmit a 10-Gb/s signal through every channel to gain the maximum cost-effective benefit. By combining the low-cost CWDM architecture and the matured 10-Gb/s technology, the CWDM-PON access network will be potential to apply at a large bandwidth demanding area in the near future. 2. Characteristics discussion of modulated source In this paper, we will focus our discussion on the importance of power penalty and transmission distance that externally modulated lasers and directly modulated lasers operated at 10-Gb/s in unrepeatered system for operation in the 1.3-μm and 1.5-μm wavelength regions. Usually, a highbit-rate and long-reach transmission presents dispersionrelated impairments. Therefore the downstream signal was designed to be carried by an external modulation source. The client side can not afford the costly external modulation source but must adopt the direct modulation DFB-LD to lower the cost. This trend is especially obvious for the passive optical network (PON) system. 2.1 Dispersion penalties for externally modulated lasers A low-chirp 1.5-μm externally modulated laser source is the most applicable to unrepeatered transmission over 50-km. A CW laser source has high power to compensate for the excess modulator loss and narrow laser linewidths to limit modulated laser sources are easy to accomplish that they install in Metro/Access applications of transmission distance between 10-km and 40-km. For a 2-dB penalty the maximum modulation rate ranges from 5-Gb/s to 10-Gb/s for system operating at 1.55-μm with 15ps/km·nm of chromatic dispersion and 100-km of fiber [10]. 2.2 Dispersion penalties for directly modulated lasers The directly modulated lasers are chirped by virtue of the transient variations in the injected carrier density. Although the standard SMF exhibits a zero dispersion point at the 1.31μm wavelength, the power penalty induced by the chromatic dispersion is a critical issue for the upstream signal around 1.31-μm in the case of optical access network applications running at 10-Gb/s [11]. The design limitations of upstream channels are best seen when the resultant power penalty is evaluated as following analysis. The expressions developed for the dispersion power penalty were applied to examine the limitations imposed on upstream transmission. For the calculation of the group delay difference between wavelengths, the chromatic dispersion coefficient is obtained from the following equation (1) [13]. The behavior of the linear material dispersion coefficient D for a typical singlemode fiber is shown in Fig.1. The wavelength λ0 is approximately 1.314-μm, and the dispersion at 1.5-μm is approximately 13.85 ps/km·nm to 17.2 ps/km·nm. 1 d 2 d (1) D 2 c d d where c and λ are the velocity of light in free space and the wavelength of the LD, respectively. The chromatic dispersion coefficients are calculated to be the values of -3.51105, 1.22359, 0.93428, and 2.97435 ps/km·nm for the wavelengths of 1275-nm, 1300-nm, 1325-nm, 1350-nm, respectively. The dispersion power penalty can be approximated as the following expression. 0.125nm, and the transmitted bit-rate is set at 10-Gb/s. In Fig. 2, the calculated power penalties with different transmission distances at 10-Gb/s are plotted for the DFB-LDs wavelengths distributed from 1275-nm to 1350-nm. It is shown that the dispersion power penalty is less than 1dB for a 20-km SMF transmission. Fig. 2. The calculation of power penalty versus transmission distance for upstream wavelengths. 3. The CWDM-PON architecture and experimental setup 3.1 The proposed CWDM-PON architecture Fig.1. The dispersion coefficient versus wavelengths for a standard single-mode fiber. In order to evaluate the chirp effect, the calculated chirp power penalties due to LD chirp and fiber chromatic dispersion was analyzed by Ymamoto, et al. [12, 14]. When the chirp effect is small, the dispersion power penalty (P) can be approximated as the following expression. 2B 4 2 P 20 log 1 ( 8) Dc t c B 2 L 1 ( Dc L t c ) 3 3 Where the Δλc is the spectrum linewidth of the DFB-LD, tc is the chirp occurrence time of the DFB-LD, B is the transmitted bit-rate, and L is the transmission distance. The chirp occurrence time of the DFB-LD (tc) is assumed to be 50 ps [15], the spectrum linewidth of the DFB-LD is assumed to be The proposed architecture of 4-channel 40-Gb/s bidirectional CWDM-PON system is shown in Fig. 3 The system utilizes CWDM architecture, a precise wavelength control for the transmitter, multiplexer and demultiplexer is not required, and this will greatly reduce the system cost. The system in Fig. 3 can be divided into center office side, remote node, and the client side. Externally modulated technique is adopted for the downstream transmission of four channels to minimize the chirp effect in the single mode fiber. 10-Gb/s directly modulated distributed feedback laser diode (DFB-LD) is built in the optical network unit (ONU) transmitting the upstream signal. The remote node is used to demultiplex the downstream channels, multiplex the upstream channels and split the network to the client side. A 4-channel multiplexer, a 4-channel demultiplexer, and five WDM couplers are needed in the remote node. The network has the flexibility to adjust subscribing bit rate of client from gigabit to 10-Gb/s and the split ratio can vary from 4 to 64. The insertion loss of each channel at the remote node can be controlled easily at 2 to 3 dB with commercial products. A 1:32 optical splitter is installed at the end of each channel. The client side is basically functioned by a 10-Gb/s bidirectional optical transceiver. A 10-Gb/s directly modulated DFB-LD is built in the optical transceiver to transmit the upstream signal [16]. By using a cost-effective CWDM technique, the benefit includes the larger bandwidth and the flexibility of adjusting the maximum bit rate of a client to 10-Gb/s. 3.2 The experimental setup of CWDM-PON system We illustrated the arrangement of the experimental setup. A schematic diagram of the measured system is shown in Fig. 4. Four 1.5-μm tunable lasers with wavelength were setting at 1510nm, 1530nm, 1550nm, and 1570nm modulated by four LiNbO3 modulator with 10-Gb/s NRZ data pseudorandom binary sequences of the pattern length 231-1 and mutiplexed by a CWDM multiplexer to simulate the downstream transmission. Four 10-Gb/s directly modulated DFB-LDs with wavelength of 1275-nm, 1300-nm, 1325-nm, and 1350-nm at an interval of 25-nm were connected with the CWDM multiplexer to simulate the upstream transmission. A 10-Gb/s optical receiver (PIN-TIA) was connected at the CWDM demultiplexer of node C and node D to receive downstream and upstream signals, respectively. The transmission distance between node A and node B is 10-km SMF. The splitting network was not deployed in the experimental setup due to the poor receiving sensitivity of the self-made optical receiver. However, the effect of the splitting network can be estimate easily by calculating the power penalties and power budgets. 4. Measurement results Fig. 3. A schematic diagram of the proposed 40-Gb/s bidirectional CWDM-PON system. 4.1 Downstream transmission results Fig. 5 and Table 1 show the transmission characteristics for downstream channels. The optical powers of the downstream channel were from -3.70 to -3.61 dBm and launched into the network simultaneously. Fig. 5 shows the received and reshaped eye patterns after 10-km SMF transmission by self-made PIN-TIA optical receiver. The OC192 eye mask margins distributed from 25% to 28%, which were improved by the limiting amplifier. The jitters were from 24.3 to 26.0 psec, which were degraded by the dispersion effect in the SMF and the optical receiving circuit. Values of the receiving power, the OC-192 eye mask margin, and the jitter for each channel are summarized in Table1. Fig. 5. (a)1510nm, (b)1530nm, (c)1550nm, (d)1570nm. The measured eye pattern of downstream channels for10-km SMF. Table 1. Measured parameters of eye pattern for 10-km SMF. Fig. 4. The experimental setup of 40-Gb/s bi-directional CWDM-PON system. Channels Power (dBm) Mask margin (%) Jitter p-p (psec) 1510nm -8.64 26 25.9 1530nm -9.17 28 24.3 1550nm -9.74 27 26.0 1570nm -10.41 25 25.15 In the downstream channels, the optical sensitivity was measured by connecting the output port of the CWDM demultiplexer with a variable optical attenuator and a selfmade optical receiver. Optical sensitivities of the back-to-back (BTB) connection were around -17.8dBm and degraded to about -17.6dBm after 10-km SMF transmission by PIN-TIA optical receiver, as shown in Fig. 6. The power penalty distributed from 0.16dB to 0.3dB. This degradation is mainly due to the SMF dispersion effect and has been minimized by the external modulation approach. With -18dBm PIN-TIA optical receiver sensitivity to ensure an error-free operation in practical systems, -4.5dBm average laser module power gives rise to a power budget of 13.5dB, which allows transmission over 10-km of standard SMF without optical amplifiers. In our elementary experiment, the power budget is about 8dB and it’s enough to afford a successive 1:4 splitting network. If input powers are increased and used a commercial APD-TIA receiver, the power budget will be enough and the sensitivities will be increased easily. Therefore, the splitting ratio could achieve to 1:32 for each channel. The related values are summarized in Table 2. 4.2 Upstream transmission results The output optical powers of the upstream channels were controlled at 1.43 to -0.9dBm and operated simultaneously. Fig. 7 shows the received and reshaped eye patterns after 10km SMF transmission by self-made PIN-TIA optical receiver. The measured eye pattern maintained at a clearly open figure and could ensure a good transmission. Values of the receiving power, the OC-192 eye mask margin, and the jitters for every channel are summarized in Table 3. (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 7. (a)1275nm, (b)1300nm, (c)1325nm, (d)1350nm. The measured eye patterns of upstream channels for 10-km SMF. Table 3. Measured parameters of eye patterns for 10-km SMF. Channels Power (dBm) Mask margin (%) Jitter p-p (psec) Fig. 6. The BER measured results of downstream channels for BTB and 10-km SMF. Table2. The measured optical power and sensitivity values. 1510nm 1530nm 1550nm 1570nm Channels Output power at -4.5 -4.35 -4.75 -4.5 node A2 (dBm) BTB sensitivity -17.83 -17.79 -17.95 -17.80 (dBm) Received power at -8.64 -9.17 -9.74 -10.41 node C2 (dBm) 10-km receiving -17.60 -17.62 -17.64 -17.53 sensitivity (dBm) Power penalty (dB) 0.23 0.16 0.30 0.26 Power budget (dB) 8.96 8.45 7.91 7.12 Splitting ratio3 1:4 1:4 1:4 1:4 1. Sensitivity was measured at BER of 10-9. 2. Output power and received power was measured at node A and C for downstream path, respectively. (as shown in Fig.4) 3. The estimated splitting-ratio was based on experimental results. 1275nm -3.66 1300nm 1325nm 1350nm -6.16 -5.43 -7.73 31 14.7 32 31 30 15.36 14.83 15.17 In the upstream channels, the optical sensitivity was measured by connecting the output port of the CWDM demultiplexer with a variable optical attenuator and a selfmade optical receiver, as shown in Fig. 8. As summarized in Table 4. The BTB receiving sensitivity of upstream channels distributed from -13.53dBm to -14.21dBm. The received sensitivity after a 10-km SMF transmission was from -13.01 to -13.80dBm. The BTB receiving sensitivity of longer wavelength channel was better due to higher quantum efficiency of the photodiode used in the self-made optical receiver. Because of the lower output power of 1300-nm and 1350-nm channel, the power budgets were only 5.40dB and 4.73dB which could not afford a succeeding splitting network. The power penalty was only several tenth dB for all four channels and was slightly larger than the downstream channels due to the direct modulation scheme. This is due to a larger dispersion of fiber from the larger spectral bandwidth of direct modulation sources. Although the dispersion coefficient is larger at the longer wavelength, since the downstream signal is external modulated, so the dispersion is smaller and results a negligible power penalty compared with upstream signals. The receiving sensitivity of this CWDM-PON system could be improved further if the output power of DFB-LDs were increased several dB or a commercial APD-TIA receiver was used. Additionally, we have observed the pulse compression effect which gives rise to a negative dispersion penalty due to a low chirp of the laser. Therefore, we have evaluated approximately power penalties due to LD chirp with 10-Gb/s data rate in DFB-LDs wavelengths from 1275-nm to 1350-nm for SMF transmission. The computed power penalties of the upstream channels could fit them to the measured results. Therefore, it would be possible to construct the proposed network. Fig. 8. The BER measurement results of upstream channels for BTB and 10-km transmission. Table 4. The measured optical power and sensitivity values. 1275nm 1300nm 1325nm 1350nm Channels Output power at 1.43 0.53 1.59 -0.9 node B2 (dBm) BTB sensitivity -13.73 -13.53 -14.09 -14.21 (dBm) Received power at -4.68 -5.4 -4.49 -6.05 node D2 (dBm) 10-km receiving -13.16 -13.01 -13.80 -13.54 sensitivity (dBm) Power penalty (dB) 0.57 0.52 0.29 0.66 Power budget (dB) 8.48 7.61 9.31 7.49 Splitting ratio3 1:4 1:4 1:4 1:4 1. Sensitivity was measured at BER of 10-9. 2. Output power and received power was measured at node B and D for upstream path, respectively. (as shown in Fig.4) 3. The estimated splitting-ratio was based on experimental results. 5. Conclusions In conclusion, a bi-directional CWDM-PON system covers a wide wavelength of 1.3-μm and 1.5-μm with a symmetric 40-Gb/s data rate for 10-km SMF transmission has been demonstrated. The maximum subscribing bit rate of each client could be adjusted from gigabit to 10-Gb/s and the splitting ratio could reach to 1:32. Four downstream channels with externally modulated light sources emitting at wavelengths from 1510-nm to 1570-nm and four upstream channels with directly modulated DFB-LD emitting at wavelengths from 1275-nm to 1350-nm were adopted to minimize the dispersion effect of SMF transmission. All the downstream and upstream channels were operated at 10-Gb/s simultaneously to experiment the 40-Gb/s transmission system. Furthermore, we have evaluated approximately power penalties due to LD chirp with 10-Gb/s data rate in DFB-LDs wavelengths from 1275-nm to 1350-nm for SMF transmission. Finally, the analysis of the power penalty and the system experiments confirm that DFB-LDs at 10-Gb/s are negligible power penalty in this proposed CWDM-PON system. Although the dispersion coefficient is larger at the longer wavelength, since the downstream signal is external modulated, the dispersion is smaller and results a negligible power penalty compared with upstream signals for 10-km SMF transmission. We experimentally identify the values of the modulation chirp effect that minimizes the transmission power penalty caused by fiber chromatic dispersion. Therefore, utilizing the low-cost CWDM architecture, the matured 10-Gb/s module technology, and the potential for a large splitting ratio, this bidirectional CWDM-PON system can meet with the high subscribing bandwidth and flexible requirement of next level high-speed fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) access networks. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by the National Science Council, Taiwan under Contract NSC96-2221-E-151-024MY3 and by the MOE Program of the Aim for the Top University Plan. References 1. Soo-Jin Park, Chang-Hee Lee, Ki-Tae Jeong, Hyung-Jin Park, Jeong-Gyun Ahn, and Kil-Ho Song, “Fiber-to-theHome Services Based on Wavelength-DivisionMultiplexing Passive Optical Network,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 22, no. 11 (2004), pp. 2582–2590. 2. S. M. Lee, M. H. Kim, and C. H. Lee, “Access and metro networks based on WDM technologies,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2623-2629, 2004. 3. Oladeji Akanbi, Jianjun Yu, and Gee-Kung Chang, “A New Scheme for Bidirectional WDM-PON Using Upstream and Downstream Channels Generated by Optical Carrier Suppression and Separation Technique,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 18, no. 2 (2006), pp. 340-342. 4. W. Yue, J.V. Mocerino, “Broadband Access Technologies for FTTx Deployment,” in Proc. of OFC, Mar. 2007, JthA86. 5. Mark Abrams, Philippe C. Becker, Y. Fujimoto, Vincent O’Byrne, and David Piehler, “FTTP Deployments in the United States and Japan—Equipment Choices and Service Provider Imperatives,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 23, no. 1 (2005), pp. 236-246. 6. S. M. Lee, M. H. Kim, and C. H. Lee, “Demonstration of a Bidirectional 80-km-Reach DWDM-PON with 8-Gb/s Capacity,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 19, no. 6 (2007), pp. 405-407. 7. G. C. Gupta, M. Kashima, H. Iwamura, H. Tamai, T. Ushikubo, and T. Kamijoh, “A Simple One-System Solution COF-PON for Metro/Access Networks,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 25, no. 1 (2007), pp. 193-199. 8. A. F. Elrefaie, R. E. Wagner, D. A. Atlas, and D. G. Daut, “Chromatic dispersion limitations in coherent lightwave transmission systems,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 6, no. 5 (1988), pp. 704–709. 9. I. Kim, T. J. Miller, and Y. K. Park, “10-Gb/s Transmission Using 1.3-μm Low-chirp High-Power Directly Modulated, Package DFB Laser Module for Short Distance (<50km) Applications,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Letters, vol. 9 (1997), pp. 1167-1169. 10. K. Morito, R. Sahara, K. Sato, and Y. Kotaki, “PenaltyFree 10 Gb/s NRZTransmission over 100 km of Standard Fiber at 1.55-μm with a Blue-Chirp Modulator Integrated DFB Laser,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 8, no. 3, Mar. 1996. 11. Wei-Ping Huang, Xun Li, Chang-Qing Xu, Xiaobin Hong, Chenglin Xu, and Wanguo Liang, “Optical Transceivers for Fiber-to-the-Premises Applications: System Requirements and Enabling Technologies,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 25 (2007), pp. 11-24. 12. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 3rd ed. 13. A. Sugimura, K. Daikoku, N. Imoto, and T. Miya, “Wavelength dispersion characteristics of single-mode fibers in low-loss region,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. QE-16 (1980), pp. 215-225. 14. Shu Yamamoto, Masakuni Kuwazuru, Hiroharu Wakabayashi, and Yoshinao Iwamoto, “Analysis of Chirp Power Penalty in 1.55-μm DFB-LD High-speed Optical Fiber Transmission System,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 5 (1987), pp. 1518-1523 15. Richard A. Linke, “Modulation induced transient chirping in single frequency lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electronics, vol. 21 (1985), pp. 593-597. 16. T. T. Shih, M. C. Lin, and W. H. Cheng, “HighPerformance Low-Cost 10 Gb/s Coaxial DFB Laser Module Packaging by Conventional TO-Can Materials and Processes,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron., vol. 12, no. 5 (2006), pp. 1009-1015.