TRIM DOC: ISSUE DATE: D10#9571 04/02/2010 WALIS Road Group Landgate Road Centreline with IRIS Data Overlayed Analysis Report CONTENTS Modelling Roads Road and Route Analysis Conclusion This document is owned and authorised by the Manager Asset and Network Information Branch. Please submit all comments and requests to the Senior Spatial Analyst, the delegated custodian. All controlled copies shall be marked accordingly Document Control Date 05/11/2009 31/12/2009 14/01/2010 03/02/2010 Version 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.0 Status Draft Draft Draft Final Description Initial draft Peer review Management review Management Approval Author Daniel Grillo Daniel Grillo Daniel Grillo Daniel Grillo Authorised by Manager Asset and Network Information 03/02/2010 Revision Status Record Section Page No. Version Description Author 1.1 MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 2 Index PREFACE .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT ....................................................................................................................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1 – MODELLING ROADS ................................................................................................................... 6 TYPICAL GIS MODEL .................................................................................................................................................. 6 LINK-NODE MODEL ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 SECTION 2 – ROAD AND ROUTE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 9 ROAD NUMBER ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 ROUTE ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 3 – CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................................................15 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 OTHER ISSUES ............................................................................................................................................................... 16 Digitised Direction of Roads ................................................................................................................................. 16 Spatial Topology ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Roads not assigned a Designated Custodian ........................................................................................................ 16 Road Lengths ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 APPENDIX B: REFERENCE DOCUMENTS .....................................................................................................17 MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 3 Preface For a number of years Landgate have been tagging road centreline managed and maintained within their organization with the Main Roads Western Australia road identification number. At an October 29th 2009 WALIS Road Group (RRCN meeting), the question was posed about the purpose and value of tagging. It was suggested that the value of tagging was to identify management and ownership of each road section. At that meeting, Main Roads representative to the group suggested that the tag could provide a means of adding Main Roads stored road attributes to Landgate road centreline. This report is prepared for members of the WALIS Road Group and is indented to: Assess the completeness of tagging on the Landgate Road Centreline; Report the ‘end benefit’ of tagging beyond identifying ‘management/ownership’; and Make any conclusions/recommendations to the group for further discussion. The work completed in this report used ESRI ArcGIS software (9.3.1). Currency of Landgate centreline used for this report is May 2009. Background Landgate and Main Roads are currently maintaining and updating ‘fit for purpose’ road information (spatial and attributes) for their core business requirements. Landgate are state providers of spatial data and produce various products and services that meet the spatial consumer market in Western Australia. Main Roads Western Australia is the state authority for roads and utilise their spatial data to manage the State Road asset and provide support to Local Government and DEC (other road custodians). Both organisations are looking for opportunities to collaborate and seek ways to remove duplicated processes, enhance the quality of road data and provide a better return on investment to the state. Any comments, suggested changes or modifications to this document are appreciated. All such comments can be addressed via email to roadinfo@mainroads.wa.gov.au Tel (08) 9323 4410 or Fax (08) 9323 4629. How to use this document The document is divided into three main sections: Section 1: Modelling Roads This section provides some background on how Landgate and Main Roads model roads. Section 2: Road and Route Analysis This section provides information on the analytical process used in this document. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 4 Section 3: Conclusion This section provides a conclusion on the process and adds further comments for the WALIS Road Group to consider in light of this report. Abbreviations and Definitions The following definitions and abbreviations are used in this document. Routable Road Centreline Network (RRCN): Road centreline that can be used for navigation that meets the operational requirements of government agencies. Integrated Road Information System (IRIS): Main Roads’ corporate road information management system. SLK Linear Referencing: A referencing system that uses a known measured value for the start and end point of a route and then is used to locate features on the route according to their relative position to the whole length of the route. Link-Node Linear Referencing: A referencing system that uses a known measured value for the start and end node of a link and then is used to locate features on the link according to their relative position to the length of the link. Route: Where one or more road sections are grouped and assigned a unique number. State Road: All highways and main roads under the control of Main Roads Western Australia. Local Road: All roads that are under the control of Local Governments. Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) Road: All roads that are under the control of Department of Environment and Conservation. Private Road: Any other road that is not a State, Local or DEC road. Logical Length: The assigned measure of a road section or route such as SLK. Spatial Length: The absolute 2D measure of a road section or route. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 5 SECTION 1 – Modelling Roads Both Landgate and Main Roads centrelines are modelled and managed in different ways. Landgate use a typical GIS model that is suitable for the creation of high end products whereas Main Roads use a link-node model in line with road asset management principles. Typical GIS Model Traditional GIS logic for roads follows a concept that where the attribute of a feature is contiguous for a section of a road, then this road section is represented by a single part feature (road segment). Where an attribute changes along the road then a new road segment is created. Where; SE = Sealed US = Unsealed Start of new road section In the Landgate example above, where the attribute of the highlighted road changes from ‘SE’ to ‘US’ (Sealed to Unsealed), then a new road segment is created. This method of maintaining road attributes can create a large number of road segmentations. It is useful to note that Landgates’ road attributes are generalised to minimise the number of road segments. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 6 Link-Node Model The link-node model used by Main Roads represents the same piece of road as a continuous road section. This road section starts at the first intersection (node) north of the area of interest and ends at the intersection (node) south of the area. Notice that another section starts at an intersection and represents the last road section for this road. Area of Interest For Main Roads, road sections provide the framework by which road information is managed and reference in a logically connected data base relationship and this represents the physical road network. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 7 In the Main Roads example, the attributes of the highlighted road are stored in an integrated road data base i.e. attributes are referenced to the road by means of linear referencing. 0.00 Where; 0.00 = Start 3.49 = Change 3.49 A product ‘view’ of sealed or unsealed roads is created from the data base using a dynamic segmentation process. This process segments the road sections to the view needed. This view is not managed, just used in mapping products and refreshed when required. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 8 SECTION 2 – Road and Route Analysis The following results are provided from analysis of the Landgate centreline. Road Number The road number is used by Main Roads to associate a road section with an agency responsible by an ‘act’ or ‘obligation’ to manage and maintain that road. It is also used to create routes (see Route Analysis). The following chart compares the number of Landgate road segments without a road number. Number of Landgate Road Segments and Main Roads Road Sections Notes: 1. Main Roads only includes State and Local Government roads that are regularly maintained (funded or unfunded). 2. Landgate includes DEC and other private roads where responsibility may not be clearly defined (65% of road segments not tagged). MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 9 Route Analysis Routes A route can be defined as ‘one or more road sections that are grouped together and assigned a unique number’. Analytical Process The following steps have been used to validate the currency of Landgate tagging and roads found with significant differences have been excluded from further analysis. The following steps were used to complete the analysis: Create Landgate Routes from tagged road segments; Prepare Length Table (Spatial Lengths + Min Max SLK’s of Main Roads Routes); Join Table to Landgate Routes; Eliminate ‘Out of Scope’ Routes; Create Landgate Routes with Main Roads SLK’s; Display ‘Main Roads’ Events on ‘Landgate’ Road Centreline; and Step 1: Using the ArcGIS ‘Create Routes’ tool, it is possible to create routes using the Landgate ‘MRWA_NUMBE’ field that contains the road number that uniquely identifies each route. Roads with null ‘MRWA_NUMBE’ are excluded. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 10 Create Routes Results Step 2: Use the ArcGIS ‘Frequency’ tool to create a table with spatial length, Minimum and Maximum SLK value and Road Name for each unique road. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 11 Step 3: Join the table from Step 2 to the Landgate Routes created in Step 1. Step 4: Eliminate ‘Out of Scope’ Routes. i) Calculate the difference in spatial length of the Main Roads and Landgate routes. ii) Analyse the results and eliminate roads <> +/- 30m length differences. Analysis Results MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 12 Step 5: Create new Landgate Routes with Main Roads SLK’s. Note: Landgates ‘MRWA_NUMBE’ or Main Roads’ ‘ROAD_NO’ field can be used. Step 6: Display ‘Main Roads’ Route Events on ‘Landgate’ Road Centreline. Using a subset of IRIS Local Road Inventory (exclude state roads in this instance) the following attributes are added to Landgate road centreline. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 13 Once a layer of events is created, export the layer to an appropriate spatial data format. The new layer will have roads segmented as per the IRIS Local Road Inventory data. The picture on the right shows the extent of Landgate road segments tagged with road numbers and created as routes and then segmented to have Main Roads stored attributes attached. The black roads are sealed roads, grey are unsealed. A ‘visual’ inspection of the results compared to the May 2009 Landgate sealed/unsealed road found differences. Differences have not been quantified in this report. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 14 SECTION 3 – Conclusion This section provides a summary of the results and some conclusions and suggestions for the WALIS Road Group. Conclusion 1. A process could be created to semi automate the addition of IRIS data directly onto Landgate road centreline using standard ArcGIS tools. Periodically, new ‘views’ could be provided to Landgate to overlay onto their current road centreline to verify such items as: Road Width (Main Roads Source); Seal Information; Road Hierarchy; Road Type (Sealed, Unsealed); and MRWA_TYPE. Other attributes such as LG responsibilities can also be derived (from the LG road number). 2. The process to transfer Main Roads stored attributes to Landgates road centreline is not a tedious task, but verifying the results against current Landgate data was not completed as part of this exercise and could prove to require a large amount of effort. It might be an interesting exercise (a separate project) to verify Landgate and/or Main Roads data. It is understood that Landgates road attributes can sometimes be generalised for the purpose of preparing cartographic products. 3. The Main Roads’ road number can be used as a key to link Main Roads attribute data to the Landgate road centreline. The reverse may also be true. Main Roads may be able to apply the Main Roads ‘Network Element Number’ to each Landgate road section so that a new ‘shape’ can be uploaded into IRIS. This was not tested in this process and could be another interesting project. 4. If updates to Landgate/Main Roads numbers are maintained, this will increase the integrity of any transfer of attributes. Creating a change report of changes to road numbers would benefit Landgates processing and management of Main Roads road numbers. Automating a ‘change’ report directly from IRIS would be ideal, but a manual semi automated process may need to be created as an interim solution. 5. It is recommended that Main Roads and Landgate complete an end to end analysis of the differences in the way their roads a modelled to consider if what is done is ‘best practice’. Bench marking eastern states road authorities (VicRoads) would be of significant benefit. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 15 Other Issues Digitised Direction of Roads It can be expected that some of Landgates’ road sections are digitised in the opposite direction than those of Main Roads. Checking the digitised direction of Landgate roads was not tested and the impact of segments in conflicting directions is unquantified in this analysis. Main Roads has recently adopted, where possible, to store the spatial direction of roads in IRIS in the direction of increasing address range. Spatial Topology The Landgate spatial data set provided to Main Roads did not include spatial topology (because it is provided as a shapefile, a poor cousin to file geodatabases). Landgate road centreline maintains spatial topology but was not essential for this exercise. The output of this process does not maintain spatial topology. Roads not assigned a Designated Custodian Landgates road centreline includes roads that do have a designated custodian. A large number of these are expected to be DEC roads, but other roads that don’t have a custodian would be excluded from this process. The issue of roads without a designated custodian is significant to Main Roads and covers questions about roads being mapped that are not safe for use by the public, road accountability and possibly opens up legal some liability issues. Road Lengths The use of 2D measures (spatial length) to exclude Landgate roads is a crude method of eliminating roads from this process and did not take percentage differences of road lengths into consideration, which I believe would result in more Landgate roads being included in this process. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 16 APPENDIX A: Reference Documents 1 IRIS Road Centreline Representation Model Catalogue. Document describes the link-node model used in Main Roads Western Australia and the way roads a modelled spatially in IRIS. A copy of the latest document can be sourced by contacting Daniel Grillo or please contact roadinfo@mainroads.wa.gov.au . 2 Project Area The following Road Information Services Project Area was used to prepare this report. Server: \\Dacsrv02\ani\RIS\PROJECT\Geodata Directory: YR2009 Folder: J25514 Project area and this report prepared by Senior Spatial Analyst, Daniel Grillo at Main Roads Western Australia. MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 17 This page left blank intentionally MAIN ROADS Western Australia 116101280 Version 1.0 D10#9571 Page 18