NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS CURRICULUM SUPPORT History A Guide to Higher History: For teachers and lecturers [HIGHER] The Scottish Qualifications Authority regularly reviews the arrangements for National Qualifications (NQ). Users of all NQ support materials, whether published by Learning and Teaching Scotland or others, are reminded that it is their responsibility to check that the support materials correspond to the requirements of the current arrangements. Please note that this resource currently refers to the old Higher History qualification first offered in 2010 and NOT the new National Qualifications which have been developed to meet the aims of Curriculum for Excellence. Acknowledgement Learning and Teaching Scotland gratefully acknowledges this contribution to the National Qualifications support programme for History. © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 This resource may be reproduced in whole or in part for educational purposes by educational establishments in Scotland provided that no profit accrues at any stage. 2 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 Contents Introduction 4 Section 1: A quick guide to the arrangements 5 Section 2: Essay writing 18 Section 3: Extended essay 26 Section 4: Sources 30 Appendices 31 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 3 INTRODUCTION Introduction Higher History has undergone significant change. In 2007, a more explicit marking approach for the extended essay was introduced, while the introduction of a 20-mark essay in Paper 1 was implemented for the 2008 examination. The success of the more rigorous marking approach for the extended essay led to the introduction of marking guidelines for Paper 1 for the 2009 examination. For the 2011 examination diet onwards, Scottish History will become a compulsory element of the Higher. This guide to Higher History has been envisaged as a supportive tool, to provide additional guidance for the revised arrangements document (effective from 2010 onwards with the first examination in 2011), while drawing together existing knowledge and practice into one document. The guide fully reflects Curriculum for Excellence, as well as the role of assessment. It is recognised that this guide cannot prescribe; rather it is intended as a tool to aid both teachers and students. It aims to be a working document for the practitioner, providing the crucial preparatory support in the delivery of Higher History. It offers a platform for continued professional and curricular development that would ultimately hone what is being delivered as well as how it is being delivered. In addition, this guide has been written as part of a series of support materials produced by Learning and Teaching Scotland to support the all -encompassing nature of change that has taken place in Higher History. 4 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Section 1: A guide to the arrangements Higher History: British & European and World Introduction Both units have identical learning outcomes and both are assessed in Paper 1 of the final examination. The units require students to: apply knowledge and demonstrate understanding of a hist orical issue in a selected context evaluate a historical issue in a selected context. The contexts cover the broad periods of medieval, early modern and later modern history. In terms of Paper 1, the questions answered may relate to any historical period. There is a free choice of contexts within each section. The units are specifically designed to encourage students to explain and comment on historical developments and events; to respond to historical issues by way of reasoned argument; and to come to a conclusion that has been reached using valid historical evidence. Emphasis is placed on the skills of communication and independent thinking. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 5 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Contexts British European and World Medieval Church, State and Feudal Society The Crusades, 1071–1204 Early modern The Century of Revolutions, 1603–1702 The American Revolution, 1763–1787 or or or The Atlantic Slave Trade The French Revolution to 1799 Britain, 1851–1951 Germany, 1815–1939 or Italy, 1815–1939 or Russia, 1881–1921 or USA, 1919–1968 or Appeasement and the Road to War to 1939 or The Cold War, 1945–1989 or Later modern or Britain and Ireland, 1900– 1985 6 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Higher History: Scottish History Introduction The Scottish History unit seeks to build knowledge and understanding of historical themes on a chosen context. It also seeks to develop the skills of historical-source handling and independent thinking. Students will become skilled in source handling, requiring them to analyse sources by interpreting them, comparing them and by placing them int o their historical context. Students will further hone their source-handling skills by explaining historical developments surrounding the sources and evaluating the reliability and usefulness of the sources. This unit will be assessed in Paper 2 of the fi nal examination and requires the student to: evaluate sources with reference to their provenance and content evaluate sources with reference to their wider historical context. Scottish History units Students will have the opportunity to learn one of the following units: 1. The Wars of Independence, 1286–1328 2. The Age of the Reformation, 1542–1603 3. The Treaty of Union, 1689–1740 4. Migration and Empire, 1830–1939 5. The Impact of the Great War, 1914–1928 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 7 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Assessment Unit assessments (NABs) Unit Assessment Total number of marks Pass mark Time allowed Historical study: British One essay (from a choice of three) 20 10 1 hour Historical study: European and World One essay (from a choice of three) 20 10 1 hour Scottish History Three questions (from four) based on four (out of five) sources 20 10 1 hour External assessment Unit Paper Task Marks Time allowed 1 hour and 20 minutes Historical study: British 1 Answer one essay from a choice of three 20 Historical study: European and World 1 Answer one essay from a choice of three 20 Scottish History 2 Answer four questions based on five sources 30 1 hour and 25 minutes Extended essay – Answer one question of student’s own choice in extended piece of writing 30 2 hours 8 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Learning and teaching Essential learning and teaching approaches The following approaches are in line with the arrangements document and fully reflect the aims and rationale behind Higher History. Students should engaged in wide-ranging, independent reading, relevant to their historical studies. Students should analyse primary and secondary source material. They should: – interpret historical source material – evaluate historical source material. Students should record information in a systematic fashion from a variety of sources: – – – – books lectures/teacher exposition electronic media audio-visual materials. Students will become acquainted with relevant historical terms and concepts. Students should participate in formal and informal discussion and debate based on and informed by historical evidence and knowledge. Students will develop the ability to think independently and make informed judgements. Exercises should take the form of: – informal discussion in groups or as a class – formal, prepared debate. Students should develop the skills for extended writing, encompassing descriptive and analytical essays or equivalent responses of differing lengths. Teachers should employ formative assessment strategies. Students should exercise critical thinking. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 9 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Learning outcomes Historical studies: British & European and World Outcome 1 Apply knowledge and demonstrate understanding of a historical issue in a selected context. Performance criteria: Students must: (a) (a) (b) (c) The knowledge selected from recall is relevant. The knowledge selected demonstrates accurate understanding of the issue. The knowledge is applied to address a specific historical issue. (b) (c) have a good knowledge and understanding of the topics and issues studied be able to select relevant, accurate and appropriate recalled knowledge apply knowledge and understanding to address a specific historical event/issue or theme. Outcome 2 Evaluate a historical issue in a selected context. Performance criteria: Students must: (a) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 10 The historical issue is placed in context. The explanation is valid in terms of the historical issue being addressed. The response is appropriately structured. The evaluation makes use of historical evidence. The conclusion is relevant to the issue and is supported by the evidence presented. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 (b) (c) (d) use their knowledge and understanding to place a specific event/issue/development in its correct historical context be able to explain and analyse the event/issue or theme be able to clearly structure their answer, ensuring good use of comprehensive and robust evidence use relevant evidence to back up their explanation/analysis. SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Scottish History Outcome 1 Evaluate sources with reference to their provenance and content. Performance criteria: Students must use their knowledge and understanding of the topic to: (a) (a) (b) (c) The evaluation of one source takes account of its origin and purpose. The evaluations interpret the content of the sources. The comparison of two sources demonstrates understanding of their content. (b) (c) evaluate a range of primary and secondary sources, taking into account their origin and purpose correctly interpret the content of the source(s) make comparisons between sources, both overall and in detail. Outcome 2 Evaluate sources with reference to their wider historical context. Performance criteria: Students should use their own knowledge and understanding of the period to: (a) (a) (b) (c) The evaluations of the sources relate to the historical developments and events through recall. The evaluations present balanced views of the sources. The evaluations of the sources demonstrate understanding of the wider context. (b) (c) place source(s) in their wider context and assess possible contextual implications present a balanced view of the source(s) consider the wider contextual background to which the sources relate. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 11 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Articulation with Curriculum for Excellence ‘The purpose of...Curriculum for Excellence is to improve the learning attainment and achievement of children and young people living in Scotland … and acquire the full range of skills and abilities for growing, living and working in the contemporary world.’ Successful learners with: enthusiasm and motivation for learning determination to reach high standards of achievement openness to new thinking and ideas Communication: Extended writing – essay and extended essay. Use of relevant historical terms and concepts. Development of debate and discursive skills. and able to: use literacy, communication and numeracy skills use technology for learning think creatively and independently learn independently and as part of a group make reasoned evaluations link and apply different kinds of learning to new situations. Numeracy: Understanding of time and historical sequence. Analysis of statistical data. Thinking creatively: Forming opinions/conclusions. Debate and discussion – lines of relevant argument. Extended essay. Independent learning: Increasing responsibility for own learning as course progresses. Evidence of independent research in preparing for the extended essay. Make reasoned arguments: Making informed judgements/conclusions. Interpreting source material. Link and apply learning: Many of the skills in history are transferable. Tangible links to skills for learning, skills for life and skills for work. 12 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Confident individuals with: self-respect a sense of physical, mental and emotional wellbeing secure values and beliefs ambition Relate to others: Developing skills of empathy to inform judgement. and able to: relate to others and manage themselves pursue a healthy and active lifestyle be self-aware develop and communicate their own beliefs and view of the world live independently as they can assess risk and make informed decisions achieve success in different areas of activity. Manage themselves: Students have to take responsibility for their own learning. Communicate own beliefs and views: Forming and communicating argument in debate and discussion. Make informed decisions: Interpretation and evaluation of historical sources. Achieve success in different areas of activity: Key skills of planning and organising, critical thinking and communication are transferable skills. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 13 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Responsible citizens with: respect for others commitment to participate responsibly in political, economic, social and cultural life and able to: develop knowledge and understanding of the world and Scotland’s place in it understand different beliefs and cultures make informed choices and decisions evaluate environmental, scientific and technological issues develop informed, ethical views of complex issues. Develop knowledge and understanding of the world: Knowledge and understanding is developed by studying human activity and development, and its contribution to shaping the modern world. Understand different cultures and beliefs: Study the way of life of the people of Scotland, Britain, Europe and the world at times in the past. Scottish History unit will facilitate a greater understanding of Scotland’s place within the world. Make informed choices and decisions: Analysis of the effect of human activity on the world and in society in the past. Develop informed ethical views of complex issues: Debate, discussion and personal reflection on issues raised by historical content. 14 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Effective contributors with: an enterprising attitude resilience self-reliance Communicate in different ways: informally and formally as an individual and as part of a group. and able to: communicate in different ways and work in different settings work in partnership and in teams take the initiative and lead apply critical thinking in new contexts create and develop solve problems. Work in partnership and in teams: to complete course tasks to discuss and debate historical issues. Apply critical thinking in new contexts: Apply historical knowledge and understanding to analyse current world problems or issues. Create and develop: new ideas/analysis of historical concepts. Problem solving: using evidence to support historical judgements by applying knowledge and understanding to consider current world problems or issues. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 15 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Articulation with Assessment Assessment is an integral part of learning and teaching in Curriculum for Excellence. It can provide an overarching picture of a young person's progress and achievements as they develop the knowledge, skills and attributes needed for learning, life and work. Further support on the role of assessment, implicitly reflecting the purposes and principles of Curriculum for Excellence, can be found in ‘Building the Curriculum 5: A Framework for Assessment’. This was designed to help those with a responsibility for learning and teaching. A streamlined and coherent system of assessment is required to ensure students, parents, teachers and other professionals have the necessary feedback regarding students’ learning and development needs. The underlying principles of assessment have, to a large extent, been borne out of Assessment is for Learning (AifL), which was founded on a research evidence base that emphasised four big ideas about learning. Students learn best when they: understand clearly what they are trying to learn, and what is expected of them are given feedback about the quality of their work, and what they can do to make it better are given advice about how to make improvements are fully involved in deciding what needs to be done next, and who can give them help if they need it. The AifL Programme applies a bottom-up approach to developing a streamlined and coherent system of assessment, through action research undertaken by teachers in schools, to provide parents, teachers and other professionals with the feedback they need on students’ learning and development needs. The list below shows various ways in which teachers and lecturers may cover some of the key elements in assessment. Sharing learning/assessment criteria Use of essay marking sheet (Appendix 2: Higher History extended essay feedback sheet) Clear learning outcomes for each lesson or topic shared with students. Students involved in identifying and agreeing task success criteria, eg for debate. 16 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 1: A GUIDE TO THE ARRANGEMENTS Feedback Making use of both verbal and written feedback to inform next steps. This will perhaps be based mostly on performance in debate and discussion as well as submitted essays and source responses. Feedback is clear and builds on previous advice. Retaining a copy of individual student’s essay marking sheets would be a helpful way to achieve this. Peer and self-assessment Students should judge their own performance against the learning intentions and success criteria. Students can keep a record of their own comments on assessed work in their jotters. Students could pair up with a ‘critical friend’ who can provide positive feedback and suggestions for development. Questioning Current practice of higher-order questioning to provoke debate and discussion. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 17 SECTION 2: ESSAY WRITING Section 2: Essay writing Introduction The assessment for Paper 1 in Higher History focuses on essay writing. Students are required to answer two questions worth 20 marks each. From 2009 onwards, detailed marking instructions will be provided for Paper 1 on the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) website. Key areas SQA have highlighted three key areas in Paper 1. Students need to: address clearly the questions set demonstrate understanding/deployment of historical analysis – rather than a narrative/descriptive approach structure answers, particularly with regard to introductions and conclusions. Types of essay question Students must recognise what is expected of them in each question. It is imperative they do not ‘shoe-horn’ prepared set answers into examination questions. Instead, students must have a clearer understanding of how to analyse questions. A better knowledge of question stems would help them achieve this. 18 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 2: ESSAY WRITING There are two main types of question. 1. Evaluating factors to explain historical developments In the Arrangements document these issues are identified in the detailed unit descriptors as beginning ‘An evaluation of the reasons for…’ These questions will always have an isolated factor, the importance of which candidates are expected to evaluate in relation to the other causes of a historical development. Examples of this type of question (The isolated factor is italicised) To what extent was the growth of democracy in Britain after 1860 due to social and economic change? How far can Robespierre alone be blamed for the Reign of Terror in France from 1793 to 1794? How important a part did the First World War play in the decision to grant votes to women? How far was the growth of Irish nationalism the main reason for the increasing tension in Ireland up to 1914? Answers to these essay titles require a careful weighing up of the various pieces of evidence involved in order to come to a balanced conclusion. Students may want to compare the importance of various factors. A balanced judgement should be given in weighing up a ll key pieces of evidence. Students must support their main points with robust evidence. On occasion this type of question may be introduced by a quotation, but the style of answer is exactly the same. ‘The need for labour on West Indian plantations was the sole reason for the development of the Atlantic Slave Trade’. How valid is this view? ‘Simply part of the post-war desire to isolate America from the outside world.’ How far does this explain changing attitudes towards immigration in the USA during the 1920’s? A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 19 SECTION 2: ESSAY WRITING 2. Making an assessment (judgement) In the Arrangements document these issues are identified in the detailed unit descriptors as beginning ‘An assessment of …’ This type of essay asks for a balancing of the evidence and arguments for and against the success, effectiveness or nature of a development. Examples of this type of question How justified is the view that the American War of Independence was a global conflict? How successfully did British governments achieve their aims in foreign policy before the outbreak of the Czechoslovakian crisis in 1938? To what extent was there a real growth in Italian nationalism between 1815 and 1850? How effective were the increased powers of the federal government, as adopted in the New Deal, in solving the social and economic problems of the1930s? On occasion this type of question may be introduced by a quotation, but the style of answer is exactly the same. ‘Poor, brutal and without hope.’ How accurate is this view of the lives of peasants in the middle ages? ‘The main role of the Church in medieval society was more political than religious.’ How valid is this statement? ‘Bullying and bluff.’ How accurate is this description of the methods used by the fascist powers to pursue their foreign policy aims in the years after 1933? In these essays, students have to answer the question by showing their understanding of the question and by presenting a balanced assessment and a valid conclusion which results from their presented evidence. Students should come to an overall judgement based on the arguments presented in the body of the essay. 20 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 2: ESSAY WRITING Differentiating types of question It is crucial that candidates are able to tell which type of question is which. It is possible that both an evaluation and an ass essment of a development may appear in the same question paper, for example: To what extent was the growth of democracy in Britain after 1860 due to social and economic change? ‘By 1928, Britain was a fully democratic country.’ How accurate is this view? Although both questions are on the growth of democracy, an answer to the former which recites the stages of the growth with little or no explanation of their causes may not merit any marks whatsoever. It is also worth noting that using stems to identi fy types of question may not be helpful to candidates. ‘To what extent…’ or ‘How far…’ may introduce either an evaluation of causes or an assessment of effectiveness or success. Structure of an essay The 20 mark essay should consist of four key elements . 1. Introduction Sets out the issue clearly in its wider context. Identifies the relevant factors – pointing the reader/examiner in the direction the essay is going to take. Demonstrates a solid line of argument. Captures the reader’s interest and attention. Links up with the main, development section. Should not answer the question. Should not present any information that is not addressed in main body. 2. Knowledge and understanding/evidence (in the development) There is a coherent development focused directly on the question. Short paragraph for each relevant point/theme made. Written factually, using information as evidence. Knowledge should be accurate, relevant and full; used to address the question. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 21 SECTION 2: ESSAY WRITING The argument flows in a logical, continuous fashion, for example arranging paragraphs chronologically or thematically from weakest to strongest argument. Each paragraph links to the next one so that the theme is maintained. Does not jump about. Paragraphs should not be too short or too long. Should not use quotations to present basic points of knowledge. 3. Argument (in the development) Quality of thought should be revealed by the arguments and evaluations demonstrated in answering the question. The argument is relevant to the question and relates explicitly to the terms of the question. A case is argued. It makes the various distinctions required by the question. All elements of the question are responded to, particularly any isolated factors. Explains, analyses, debates and assesses. Evidence is integrated into a sustained analysis. Provides a sustained, balanced argument. Awareness is shown of alternative interpretations and historical debate. Clarity and fluency of argument are apparent. Sophistication of language. Does not simply describe or narrate. 4. Conclusion A balanced conclusion is achieved Summarises the arguments and reinforces them. Directly answers the question or addresses the issue, providing a valid, balanced explanation and conclusion. An overall judgement should be made direct ly related to the question. Does not simply summarise main ‘facts’. 22 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 2: ESSAY WRITING How essays are marked in Paper 1 In marking Paper 1 essays a student will be rewarded according to the following: 1. Knowledge and understanding Up to 6 marks can be allocated when relevant knowledge is used to address an essay question. Marks are credited for each accurate, full point of knowledge made. Each point in turn should be substantial and relevant. Extended development (whereby a student develops a point of knowledge further) can also be credited. 2. Argument/evaluation Up to 10 marks can be allocated for the quality of thought revealed in the answer, exemplified by the arguments and evaluation conveyed in the essay. Argument/evaluation is marked holistically, with clearly identifiable criteria employed: 0–1 marks The style is narrative and descriptive. There is little or no clear attempt to answer the question set. 2–3 marks A mainly narrative and descriptive style is employed. There are brief attempts to answer the question. 4–5 marks The style demonstrates some analysis, although elements of narration may prevail. 6–7 marks The style is analytical, with evidence used to develop and support a line of argument. The line of argument is focused directly on the question. 8–10 marks The evidence is integrated into a sustained analysis. The argument is sustained and balanced, with some awareness of alternative interpretations and/or historical debate. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 23 SECTION 2: ESSAY WRITING 3. Structure Up to 4 marks can be allocated for the appropriateness and organisation of the answer. Structure is marked holistically, with clearly identifiable criteria employed: 24 0 marks There is no identifiable attempt to establish context or relevant factor. The development is unstructured or random. There is no attempt to provide an answer in terms of the question. 1 mark There is some attempt to establish context or relevant factors. There is an attempt to develop an answer, although there may be some significant omissions. The conclusion may be implicit. 2 marks The introduction establishes the context and indicates relevant factors and outlines a line of argument. There is an identifiable development of the answer. The conclusion is a summary linked to the question. 3 marks The introduction establishes the context, indicates relevant factors and outlines a line of argument. There is a coherent development related directly to the question. The conclusion is clearly based on the evidence presented, and is directly linked to the question. 4 marks The introduction clearly sets the issue in its wider context, indicates relevant factors and demonstrates a solid line of argument. There is a coherent development focused directly on the question. The conclusion is balanced, summarising the arguments and coming to an overall judgement related directly to the question. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 2: ESSAY WRITING Exemplification To support teachers in marking activities, examples of student work are available on the SQA Understanding Standards website at http://www.understandingstandards.org.uk . You may consider accessing this website as part of a continuing professional development activity as it provides opportunities for teachers to mark a broad range of answers. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 25 SECTION 3: EXTENDED ESSAY Section 3: Extended essay Introduction The extended essay is the coursework element of Higher History and counts for nearly one-third of the overall grade – 30 marks out of a total of 100. It is really just a longer and more in -depth version of a Paper 1 essay. Students choose an essay title themselves from a context studied, research it, draw up a 200 -word plan (which may be word-processed) and then formally write the essay under examination conditions within 2 hours with only the help of their plan. Both the plan and the essay are submitted to SQA. Purpose The extended essay allows students to: develop their interest in a particular area of the syllabus further develop and hone their research skills provide an opportunity for students to work independently demonstrate their ability with fewer constraints being placed on time and memory retention. Timing Most schools and colleges will begin work on the extended essay in the spring term. Although there is no reason why preparation for the extended essay cannot begin earlier, it is probably more advisable to wait until students have a better grasp of the course content and historical skills before starting preparations. 26 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 3: EXTENDED ESSAY SQA advise that a total of 8 hours of class time should be allocated to the extended essay to allow students to plan and research. Schools and colleges should check the extended essay submission deadline and plan carefully, especially since many of them will also be undertaking their preliminary examinations in the spring term. Choosing an essay title Students can choose either an essay title they have tackled as part of their classwork or an issue of their own choosing. Beware Essay titles must relate to the Higher syllabus. Schools and colleges should check the arrangements carefully. Titles must be a question and should address an issue. Essay titles should be kept relatively straightforward, otherwise they will be too difficult to answer. Whole classes should not tackle the same two or three issues – this may lead to a compromise in originality. The student should work independently as far as possible. It is recognised that some students may require more support. However, schools and colleges should remember that the work should be the student’s own. It is not permissible to have worked from a group/class plan or a plan produced by the teacher/lecturer. Similarly, it is not permissible to use as a plan a marking scheme for a past SQA question paper. While it is recognised that several students within a school or college may tackle a particular topic, the essay titles should be different (eg by varying an isolated factor) and the order of paragraphs and the quotes used are expected to differ. Where the above practices are detected, they will deemed plagiarism and may have marks deducted or the marks for the component being disallowed. Students should be informed in advance of any planning of their essay, of the potentially serious consequences of infringement of any of the conditions specified above. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 27 SECTION 3: EXTENDED ESSAY The plan Students are allowed to use a 200-word plan in helping them write their extended essay, as the extended essay is not primarily designed as a memory test. Beware Up to 10 marks can be deducted should a plan go over the word limit. The plan must be words – pictures, codes and text message language are not allowed. However, mind maps and use of colour are allowed. The plan should not simply be a list of ‘facts’, but should also show the organisation and flow of the essay. Preparation In preparing students for the formal extended essay exa mination, it is advisable that they are given the opportunity to write their extended essay first at their leisure and then in the set exam time. This will ensure that they are well prepared, allowing both practitioners and students to gauge the success of the essay structure, argument, deployment of quotes etc. More importantly, a timed class trial will identify any issues with completing the essay in 2 hours. Students must have completed the plan and the flyleaf before writing the extended essay. Writing the extended essay Individual schools and colleges are free to choose the date and time of the formal extended essay examination, as long as it is before the deadline for submission. During the formal examination, the following conditions must be observed: The extended essay must be written on A4 paper supplied by the school/college. The formal extended essay examination must be a single continuous period of up to 2 hours. Students must not take in any materials other than their plan. They must not write on the plan during the writing up. Students must not receive any help during the formal extended essay examination. 28 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 SECTION 3: EXTENDED ESSAY How the extended essay is marked The extended essay (since 2007) is marked on three key elements: Structure Argument Knowledge 6 marks For structure (S), marks are awarded for the overall quality, using criteria statements for the structure, introduction and conclusion. 12 marks Marks are awarded for the overall quality of the argument (A), using criteria statements. There is a higher and a lower mark in each range and these should be used to reflect the degree to which the criteria are met. 12 marks Marks for knowledge (KU) are awarded for each recognisable and relevant point, up to a maximum of 12 marks. Points that are developed may be credited with 2 marks. A full exemplar of a marked extended essay is available on the SQA secure site (http://secure.sqa.org.uk/secure/1624.html). An adapted extended essay marking grid is provided in Appendix 2 to aid teachers in marking practice extended essays before the final writing up session. It is hoped that this is a useful tool in helping teachers to support improving performance. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 29 SECTION 4: SOURCES Section 4: Sources Sources are the basic materials of the historian. From them the historian tries to describe explain and analyse historical events and developments. In Higher History, from 2011 onwards, the source paper (Paper 2) will consist entirely of Scottish topics. There will be a minimum of two primary and two secondary sources within the five sources in the paper. The length of written sources will range from 120 to 180 words. There will be four questions, each of which will relate to a different issue in the unit, so that the whole unit will be examined each year. Between them, the four questions will sample the four issues boxed in the detailed descriptors. The issues and the sub-issues derived from them are laid out in the course assessment specification, which is contained in the specimen question paper. The order of sampling will be the same in all the contexts. The background and perspective will not be examined directly. The source evaluation question will be worth 5 marks; there will up to 2 marks available for evaluating provenance and content and for providing appropriate recall. It will relate to one of the issues directly or indirectly, and have the stem ‘How useful is Source X as evidence of…’ The source comparison question will be worth 5 marks; there will be up to 2 marks available for an overview and up to 4 marks available for comparisons of detail. The latter should be along the lines of the developed comparisons at Standard Grade or Intermediate 2. It will relate to one of the issues directly or indirectly, and have th e stem ‘To what extent do Sources Y and Z agree about…’ The two source-contextualisation questions will each be worth 10 marks. One will have the stem ‘How fully…’ and will relate to the whole issue. The other will have the stem ‘How far…’ and relate to o ne of the three sub-issues within the issue. There will be up to 4 marks available from the source bearing the question, and up to 7 marks for appropriate recall used to support the evaluation. A marking grid is contained in Appendix 3. 30 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 APPENDICES Appendices Appendix 1a: History Higher essay feedback sheet Name Class Essay title Structure (S) Mark as appropriate Criteria No identifiable attempt to establish context or relevant factor. The development is unstructured or random. There is no attempt to provide an answer in terms of the question. There is some attempt to establish context or relevant factors. 1 mark There is an attempt to develop an answer, although there may be some significant omissions. The conclusion may be implicit. 2 marks The introduction establishes the context and indicates relevant factors and outlines a line of argument. There is an identifiable development of the answer. The conclusion is a summary linked to the question. 3 marks The introduction establishes the context, indicates relevant factors and outlines a line of argument. There is a coherent development related directly to the question. The conclusion is clearly based on the evidence presented, and is linked directly to the question. 4 marks The introduction clearly sets the issue in its wider context, indicates relevant factors and demonstrates a solid line of argument. There is a coherent development focused directly on the question. The conclusion is balanced, summarising the arguments and coming to an overall judgement related directly to the question. Comments: 0 marks A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 31 APPENDICES Argument (A) Mark and/or award grade as appropriate Criteria 0–1 marks 2–3 mark 4–5 marks 6–7 marks The style is narrative and descriptive. There is little or no clear attempt to answer the question set. A mainly narrative and descriptive style is employed. There are brief attempts to answer the question. The style demonstrates some analysis, although elements of narration may prevail. The style is analytical, with evidence use d to develop and support a line of argument. The line of argument is focused directly on the question. 8–10 The evidence is integrated into a sustained analysis. marks The argument is sustained and balanced, with some awareness of alternative interpretations and/or historical debate. Comments: Knowledge (K) Mark Criteria 0–6 marks Up to 6 marks are allocated when relevant knowledge is used to address an essay question. Marks are credited for each accurate, full point of knowledge made. Each point should be substantive and relevant. Extended development can also be credited. Comments: 32 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 Award appropriately APPENDICES Target box Completed by the student, to identify – using qualitative feedback – steps for improvement. Total mark K A S Total /6 /10 /4 /20 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 33 APPENDICES Structure Appendix 1b: History Higher essay marking matrix 34 D C B A A+ A++ ≤9 10/11 12/13 14/15 16/17 18–20 There is some organisation of the response. An attempt is made at an introduction, development and conclusion. This may be implicit. A recognisable attempt is made at an introduction, development and conclusion. There is a coherent introduction, development and conclusion. There is a coherent structure with an introduction, development and conclusion. There is a coherent structure directly focused on the issue. There is minimal establishment of context or line of argument. Some attempt is made to establish context and/or line of argument. A recognisable attempt is made to establish context and/or line of argument and/or factors to be developed. There is a clear attempt to address the topic/issue. The introduction establishes the context, demonstrates a solid line of argument and indicates relevant factors to be developed. The introduction clearly establishes the context, demonstrates a solid line of argument and indicates relevant factors to be developed. The introduction is substantial and clearly sets the issue in its wider context, establishing a coherent line of argument and taking into account a range of relevant factors to be developed. A conclusion is linked to the topic/issue. It may be implicit. The conclusion is a summary linked to the topic/issue. It may be implicit throughout the essay. The conclusion is an explicit summary linked to the topic/issue. The conclusion is clearly based on the evidence presented and directly relates to the topic/issue. The conclusion is directly related to the topic/issue and clearly based on the arguments and evidence presented. The conclusion is clear and balanced, summarising the arguments, and coming to an overall judgement directly related to the topic/issue. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 Argument/evaluation Knowledge APPENDICES D C B ≤9 10/11 Knowledge is mostly irrelevant. Relevant knowledge included, but some points are irrelevant. Frequent inaccuracies. A few inaccuracies included. There is some comment that recognises the topic/issue. Some meaningful comment is used that recognises the topic/issue. Some evidence is used with meaningful comments that recognise the topic/issue. The style is narrative and descriptive in approach. The overall style is narrative and descriptive in approach. There is a clear awareness of the topic/issue to be addressed. Knowledge is accurate and relevant. A A+ A++ The knowledge included is relevant and contributes to the main argument. The knowledge included is accurate and relevant, helping drive the analysis of the topic. The knowledge included is accurate and skilfully selected demonstrating an excellent knowledge of topic as well as its historiography. The evidence is used to lead the development of the line of argument. The evidence is integrated into a developed and sustained analysis. There is some awareness of areas of debate. The evidence is integrated into a developed, fluent and sustained analysis. There is awareness of different interpretations. A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 35 APPENDICES Appendix 2: History Higher extended essay feedback sheet Name __________________________________________ Class ___________ Essay title: Structure (including introduction and conclusion)* Argument/evaluation* D C B A A+ A++ 1 2 3 4 5 6 1–2 3–4 5–6 7–8 9–10 11–12 *Based on band descriptions; circle as appropriate. Evidence (up to 12 marks, based on valid points) Additional comments (as appropriate) Evidence: Argument: Structure: General: Mark 36 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 APPENDICES Appendix 3 Marking grid for Paper 2 1. How far does Source A explain … Feature of marking Mark allocation Use of source Up to 4 marks Use of relevant recall Up to 7 marks 10 marks Marks given Overall mark Comments: ……………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………. 2. To what extent do Sources B and C agree about … Feature of marking Mark allocation Overall comparison Up to 2 marks Direct comparisons Up to 4 marks 5 marks Marks given Overall mark Comments: ………………………………..………………………………….………………… …………………………………..…………………………………………………. …………………………………………………………………………………....... A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009 37 APPENDICES 3. How fully does Source D explain … Feature of marking Mark allocation Use of source Up to 4 marks Use of relevant recall Up to 7 marks 10 marks Marks given Overall mark Comments: ……………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………… 4. How useful is Source E as evidence of … Feature of marking Mark allocation Evaluation of provenance Up to 2 marks Evaluation of content Up to 2 marks Evaluation of relevant recall Up to 2 marks 5 marks Mark given Overall mark Comments: ………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………… 38 A GUIDE TO HIGHER HISTORY (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009