FLIGHT MISSION CHALLENGE: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Educator’s Guide with Activities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Grades 5-9 Acknowledgements Authors: Victoria B. Costa, Professor, Science Education, California State University, Fullerton, California Shaun Smith, Education Flight Projects Specialist, NASA Dryden/AERO Institute Maria Blue, Elementary Teacher, Santa Clarita, California Julie Bookman, Science Teacher, Palmdale, California Marlene McShea, Science Teacher, Palmdale, California Bobbie Mitchell, Mathematics Teacher, Palmdale, California AREES Master Educators participated in earthquake and soil moisture research missions aboard the Gulfstream-III during summer 2010. Pictured with the team is Michelle Haupt, NASA Engineering Operations Specialist. Special Thanks To: Tim Moes, NASA UAVSAR Project Manager, NASA Tom Mace, Senior Science Advisor, NASA Doug Phelps, Science Teacher, Los Angeles, California Sonja Squires, Science Teacher, Palmdale, California Editor: Michelle Haupt, NASA Engineering Operations Specialist, NASA Randy Albertson, NASA Airborne Science Program Deputy Director, NASA Russell Billings, NASA Dryden Pre-College Manager, NASA Dryden/AERO Institute XXX Katrina Emery, NASA University Research Center Program Manager, NASA Yvonne Campos, Teacher, Palmdale, California Letter to Educators Dear Educators, The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is gaining a better understanding of earthquakes in California thanks to a specially modified jet, the Gulfstream-III. NASA engineers use radar to collect data on how quakes change the Earth’s surface, which may eventually help scientists predict earthquakes. NASA hopes to collect baseline data in critical areas in order to improve our understanding of how quakes affect not only the immediate area of the quake, but also the state of stress in the surrounding faults. This will help them improve their forecast models of quake probability and magnitude. This educator guide is a starting point for middle school students to begin researching and answering the challenge of improving earthquake monitoring across the United States and throughout the world. At this time, baseline data have been collected throughout California and a few other regions, such as Haiti and the Dominican Republic. The primary challenge of the Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring is to identify where, how, and why additional baseline data should be collected. The guide is divided into three major sections. The first section engages students in the study of earthquakes, including the causes and locations of earthquakes; scale and measurement of earthquakes; impact and ways to mitigate earthquakes’ effects. This section leads students to identify new areas where collection of baseline earthquake data is critical. The second section of the guide engages students in the principles of flight and flight planning, including requirements for planning a flight on the G-III, the collection and analysis of UAVSAR data, and use of the NASA online flight planning tool. This section leads students to develop a flight plan that allows for the efficient and comprehensive collection of data. A third section of the guide provides further details on the FMC: IEM rules and requirements, multimedia formats and resources, and evaluation rubrics. In this contest, small teams of students are challenged to design a flight mission to collect baseline earthquake monitoring data. The Flight Mission Careers Corner highlights NASA scientists and engineers involved in the G-III UAVSAR missions. With the goal of assembling the best team possible, student team members will be assigned expert roles. If a team is small, then some members may need to fulfill more than one role. Mission Scientist Flight Engineer: Flight Operations Specialist Find the Flight Mission Challenge: Technology Specialist (UAVSAR) Improving Earthquake Monitoring Mission Director/Project Manager (FMC: IEM) starting on page XX of Pilot this guide. Information about the Technology Specialist (Multimedia) FMC: IEM contest will be found at: Through the activities and independent research, student teams will: Select a site for earthquake monitoring Prepare a flight plan Develop a multimedia proposal to submit to NASA http://XXX.nasa.gov FPC: IEM is a dynamic, standards-based classroom project that provides your students the opportunity to investigate, evaluate, design, and present a solution for a real world problem that will not only contribute to our knowledge of how earthquakes shape the surface of the earth, but also inform our understanding of environmental hazards at the global level. Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements Letter to Educators Introduction for Educators Standards Science Mathematics English/Language Arts Technology Learning Objectives Unit Timeline Teacher Notes Assessment Timeline Strategies for Engaging and Supporting All Students Daily Log Questions Key Vocabulary Section 1: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Introduction The Flight Mission Challenge Establishing Teams Activity 1.1: Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm Earthquakes: From Cause to Impact Activity 1.2: Plate Tectonics and Volcanism Activity 1.3: Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes How Scientists Monitor Earthquakes Mitigating the Impact of Earthquakes Engineering Extension: Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge Activity 1.4: Selecting the Site for the Flight Mission Challenge Section 2: Elements of Flight Planning The G-III UAVSAR Activity 2.1: Swath Geometry Problem Set Activity 2.2: Interpreting Interferograms Components of a Flight Plan Activity 2.3: Flight Planning – Part 1 FMC:IEM Considerations Activity 2.4: Flight Planning – Part 2 The Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Challenge Objectives Challenge Description Assessment Process Extensions Multimedia Options and Resources FMC: IEM Multimedia Presentation Rubric Letter to Students Instructional Materials Student Resources - Improving Earthquake Monitoring Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm (Activity 1.1) Team Members (Activity 1.1) Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes (Activity 1.3) Argument Construction Worksheet (Activity 1.4) Presentation Flow Chart - Site Selection (Activity 1.4) Student Resources - Elements of Flight Planning Swath Geometry Problem Set (Activity 2.1) Interpreting Interferograms (Activity 2.2) Flight Plan Draft (Activity 2.3) Presentation Flow Chart – Flight Plan (Activity 2.4) Teacher Resources Proposal Checklist and Scoring Guide (Activity 2.5) Team Conference Checklist Daily Log Prompts Multiple Choice Test Bank Online Resources Plate Tectonics and Volcanoes (Activity 1.2) Engineering Design Packet (Engineering Extension) Additional Resources Career Corner Summaries Career Corner: Project Manager Engineer Tim Moes Career Corner: Flight Operations Engineer Michelle Haupt Career Corner: Instrument Engineer XXX Career Corner: Pilot XXX Career Corner: Mission Scientist XXX Resources Shaky Table Construction Directions Educator Reply Card SCIENCE Standards Addressed in the FMC:IEM Curriculum National (5-8) Science as Abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry Inquiry Understanding about scientific inquiry Earth and Space Structure of the Earth System Science Science and Abilities of technological design Technology Understanding about science and technology Science in Populations, resources, and environments Personal /Social Natural hazards Perspectives Science and technology in society California (9-12) Students will . . . Earth Science 1 Plate Tectonics and Earth’s Structure (1.a.) Know evidence of plate tectonics is derived from the fit of the continents; the location of earthquakes, volcanoes, and midocean ridges; and the distribution of fossils, rock types, and ancient climatic zones. (1.d.) Know that earthquakes are sudden motions along breaks in the crust called faults and that volcanoes and fissures are locations where magma reaches the surface. (1.e.) Know major geologic events, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and mountain building, result from plate motions. (1.f.) Know how to explain major features of California geology (including mountains, faults, volcanoes) in terms of plate tectonics. (1.g.) Know how to determine the epicenter of an earthquake and know that the effects of an earthquake on any region vary, depending on the size of the earthquake, the distance of the region from the epicenter, the local geology, and the type of construction in the region. 2 Shaping Earth’s Surface (2.d.) Students know earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides, and floods change human and wildlife habitats. Forces and 2. Forces (8th) Motion (2.a.) Students know a force has both direction and magnitude. (2.b). Students know when an object is subject to two or more forces at once, the result is the cumulative effect of all the forces. (2.c.) Students know when the forces on an object are balanced, the motion of the object does not change. (2.d.) Students know how to identify separately the two or more forces that are acting on a single static object, including gravity, elastic forces due to tension or compression in matter, and friction. (2.e.) Students know that when the forces on an object are unbalanced, the object will change its velocity (that is, it will National (9-12) Abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry Understanding about scientific inquiry Energy in the earth system Abilities of technological design Understanding about science and technology Natural and human-induced hazards Science and technology in local, national, and global challenges California (9-12) Students will . . . 6. Processes (6.a) Know features of the ocean floor (magnetic patterns, age, and sea-floor topography) provide evidence of plate tectonics. (6.b.) Know the principal structures that form at the three different kinds of plate boundaries. (6.c.) Know why and how earthquakes occur and the scales used to measure their intensity and magnitude. speed up, slow down, or change direction). (2.f.) Students know the greater the mass of an object, the more force is needed to achieve the same rate of change in motion. Investigation and Experimentation Develop a hypothesis. Select and use appropriate tools and technology (including calculators, computers, balances, spring scales, microscopes, and binoculars) to perform tests, collect data, and display data. Construct appropriate graphs from data and develop qualitative statements about the relationships between variables. Communicate the steps and results from an investigation in written reports and oral presentations. Read a topographic map and a geologic map for evidence provided on the maps and construct and interpret a simple scale map. Identify changes in natural phenomena over time without manipulating the phenomena (e.g., a tree limb, a grove of trees, a stream, a hill slope). Select and use appropriate tools and technology (such as computer-linked probes, spreadsheets, and graphing calculators) to perform tests, collect data, analyze relationships, and display data. Recognize the usefulness and limitations of models and theories as scientific representations of reality. Read and interpret topographic and geologic maps. Recognize the cumulative nature of scientific evidence. Analyze situations and solve problems that require combining and applying concepts from more than one area of science. Investigate a science-based societal issue by researching the literature, analyzing data, and communicating the findings. Examples of issues include irradiation of food, cloning of animals by somatic cell nuclear transfer, choice of energy sources, and land and water use decisions in California. MATHEMATICS Standards Addressed in the FMC:IEM Curriculum National (5-8) Students will . . . Algebra Use symbolic algebra to represent situations and to solve problems, especially those that involve linear relationships Geometry Measurement and Geometry Understand relationships among the angles, side lengths, perimeters, areas, and volumes of similar objects Draw geometric objects with specified properties, such as side lengths or angle measures Recognize and apply geometric ideas and relationships in areas outside the mathematics classroom, such as art, science, and everyday life Measurement Understand, select, and use units of appropriate size and type to measure angles, perimeter, area, surface area, and volume Select and apply techniques and tools to accurately find length, area, volume, and angle measures to appropriate levels of precision Data Analysis Select, create, and use appropriate graphical representations of data, and Probability including histograms, box plots, and scatterplots California (Grades 6-7) Students will . . . Algebra and (2.3) Solve problems involving rates, average speed, distance, Functions and time. (6) Statistics, Data Analysis, and Probability Mathematical Reasoning (1.3) Use measures expressed as rates (e.g., speed, density) and measures expressed as products (e.g., person-days) to solve problems; check the units of the solutions; and use dimensional analysis to check the reasonableness of the answer. (7) (2.1) Use formulas routinely for finding the perimeter and area of basic two-dimensional figures and the surface area and volume of basic three-dimensional figures, including rectangles, parallelograms, trapezoids, squares, triangles, circles, prisms, and cylinders. (7) (2.5) Identify claims based on statistical data and, in simple cases, evaluate the validity of the claims. (6) (1.1) Know various forms of display for data sets, including a stem-andleaf plot or box-and-whisker plot; use the forms to display a single set of data or to compare two sets of data. (7) (1.1) Analyze problems by identifying relationships, distinguishing relevant from irrelevant information, identifying missing information, sequencing and prioritizing information, and observing patterns. (6, 7) (2.5) Use a variety of methods, such as words, numbers, symbols, charts, graphs, tables, diagrams, and models, to explain mathematical reasoning. National (9-12) Students will . . . Use symbolic algebra to represent and explain mathematical relationships Analyze properties and determine attributes of two- and three-dimensional objects Draw and construct representations of two- and three-dimensional geometric objects using a variety of tools Use geometric ideas to solve problems in, and gain insights into, other disciplines and other areas of interest such as art and architecture Make decisions about units and scales that are appropriate for problem situations involving measurement Understand and use formulas for the area, surface area, and volume of geometric figures, including cones, spheres, and cylinders Understand histograms, parallel box plots, and scatterplots and use them to display data California (9-12) Students will . . . Algebra (8-12) (1.0) Identify and use the arithmetic properties of subsets of integers and rational, irrational, and real numbers, including closure properties for the four basic arithmetic operations where applicable: (5.0) Students solve multistep problems, including word problems, involving linear equations and linear inequalities in one variable and provide justification for each step. Geometry (8-12) (10.0) Students compute areas of polygons, including rectangles, scalene triangles, equilateral triangles, rhombi, parallelograms, and trapezoids. (11.0) Students determine how changes in dimensions affect the perimeter, area, and volume of common geometric figures and solids. Probability and Statistics Process (8.0) Students organize and describe distributions of data by using a number of different methods, including frequency tables, histograms, standard line and bar graphs, stem-andleaf displays, scatterplots, and box-and-whisker plots. (6, 7) ENGLISH/LANGUAGE ARTS Standards Addressed in the FMC:IEM Curriculum California (Grade 6 provided as representative of grades 5-8) Reading (2.4) Clarify an understanding of texts by creating outlines, logical notes, summaries, or reports. (2.5) Follow multiple-step instructions for preparing applications (e.g., for a public library card, bank savings account, sports club, league membership). Writing Written and Oral English Language Conventions (1.4) Use organizational features of electronic text (e.g., bulletin boards, databases, keyword searches, e-mail addresses) to locate information. (2.3) Write research reports. (2.5) Write persuasive compositions. (1.1) Use simple, compound, and compound-complex sentences; use effective coordination and subordination of ideas to express complete thoughts. California (9-10) (2.2) Prepare a bibliography of reference materials for a report using a variety of consumer, workplace, and public documents. (2.3) Generate relevant questions about readings on issues that can be researched. (2.4) Synthesize the content from several sources or works by a single author dealing with a single issue; paraphrase the ideas and connect them to other sources and related topics to demonstrate comprehension. (2.5) Extend ideas presented in primary or secondary sources through original analysis, evaluation, and elaboration. (2.6) Demonstrate use of sophisticated learning tools by following technical directions (e.g., those found with graphic calculators and specialized software programs and in access guides to World Wide Web sites on the Internet). 1.3 Use clear research questions and suitable research methods (e.g., library, electronic media, personal interview) to elicit and present evidence from primary and secondary sources. 1.4 Develop the main ideas within the body of the composition through supporting evidence (e.g., scenarios, commonly held beliefs, hypotheses, definitions). 1.5 Synthesize information from multiple sources and identify complexities and discrepancies in the information and the different perspectives found in each medium (e.g., almanacs, microfiche, news sources, in-depth field studies, speeches, journals, technical documents). (2.3) Write expository compositions, including analytical essays and research reports. (2.4) Write persuasive compositions. Listening and Speaking (1.4) Select a focus, an organizational structure, and a point of view, matching the purpose, message, occasion, and vocal modulation to the audience. (1.5) Emphasize salient points to assist the listener in following the main ideas and concepts. (1.6) Support opinions with detailed evidence and with visual or media displays that use appropriate technology. (1.7) Use effective rate, volume, pitch, and tone and align nonverbal elements to sustain audience interest and attention. (2. 1) Deliver informative presentations. (2.4) Deliver persuasive presentations. (2.5) Deliver presentations on problems and solutions. (1.3) Choose logical patterns of organization (e.g., chronological, topical, cause and effect) to inform and to persuade, by soliciting agreement or action, or to unite audiences behind a common belief or cause. (1.4) Choose appropriate techniques for developing the introduction and conclusion (e.g., by using literary quotations, anecdotes, references to authoritative sources). (1.5) Recognize and use elements of classical speech forms (e.g., introduction, first and second transitions, body, conclusion) in formulating rational arguments and applying the art of persuasion and debate. (1.6) Present and advance a clear thesis statement and choose appropriate types of proof (e.g., statistics, testimony, specific instances) that meet standard tests for evidence, including credibility, validity, and relevance. (1.7) Use props, visual aids, graphs, and electronic media to enhance the appeal and accuracy of presentations. (1.8) Produce concise notes for extemporaneous delivery. (1.9) Analyze the occasion and the interests of the audience and choose effective verbal and nonverbal techniques (e.g., voice, gestures, eye contact) for presentations. (2.2) Deliver expository presentations. (2.6) Deliver persuasive presentations. TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS Addressed in the FMC:IEM Curriculum (National Education Technology Standards, ISTE) National (K-12) Students will . . . Apply existing knowledge to generate new ideas, products, or processes. Creativity and Create original works as a means of personal or group expression. Innovation Use models and simulations to explore complex systems and issues. Identify trends and forecast possibilities. Communication and Collaboration Interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing a variety of digital environments and media. Communicate information and ideas effectively to multiple audiences using a variety of media and formats. Contribute to project teams to produce original works or solve problems. Research And Information Fluency Plan strategies to guide inquiry. Locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and media. Evaluate and select information sources and digital tools based on the appropriateness to specific tasks. Process data and report results. Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Decision Making Identify and define authentic problems and significant questions for investigation. Plan and manage activities to develop a solution or complete a project. Collect and analyze data to identify solutions and/or make informed decisions. Use multiple processes and diverse perspectives to explore alternative solutions. Digital Citizenship Exhibit a positive attitude toward using technology that supports collaboration, learning, and productivity. Technology Operations and Concepts Understand and use technology systems. Select and use applications effectively and productively. Troubleshoot systems and applications. Transfer current knowledge to learning of new technologies. Learning Objectives SCIENCE Students will . . . Use scientific terms to explain how earthquakes result from plate motions. Rank regions in terms of the amount, intensity, and magnitude of earthquakes. Use scientific, economic, and sociocultural reasons to argue for the selection of a location for collection of baseline earthquake data. Identify multiple ways that human populations, resources, and environments shape and are shaped by probability and scope of natural hazards. Investigate a science-based societal issue by researching the literature, analyzing data, and communicating the findings. MATHEMATICS Students will . . . Solve problems involving rates, average speed, distance, and time. Compute areas of rectangles. Identify claims based on statistical data. Analyze problems by identifying relationships, distinguishing relevant from irrelevant information, identifying missing information, sequencing and prioritizing information, and observing patterns. Use a variety of methods, such as words, numbers, symbols, charts, graphs, tables, diagrams, and models, to explain mathematical reasoning. ENGLISH/LANGUAGE ARTS Students will . . . Logically organize a digital presentation (e.g., chronological, topical, cause and effect) to inform and to persuade, by soliciting agreement or action, or to unite audiences behind a common belief or cause. Use clear research questions and suitable research methods (e.g., library, electronic media, personal interview) to elicit and present evidence from primary and secondary sources. Use props, visual aids, graphs, and electronic media to enhance the appeal and accuracy of presentations. Create and deliver a persuasive presentation. TECHNOLOGY Students will . . . Interact, collaborate, and publish an original multimedia presentation with peers employing a variety of digital environments and media. Contribute to project teams to produce original works or solve problems. Locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and media. Identify and define authentic problems and significant questions for investigation. ENGINEERING Students will . . . Employ mathematical modeling and consider constraints and limitations in the creation of a flight plan. Explore careers in engineering. Use the engineering design process to develop an earthquake-resistant structure. Unit Timeline Day 1 Day 2 Section 1: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Day 3 OPTIONAL (1-3 days) Students are introduced to the Flight Mission Challenge and are assigned teams and roles. In teams and role-specific groups, students and complete the Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm and Team Members worksheets. In pairs, students complete their study of earthquakes by completing the Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes activity. In pairs, students begin to identify possible site locations. Students consider ways to mitigate earthquake damage. In the Engineering Extension, student teams complete the QuakyShaky Design Challenge. Student teams construct and test an earthquakeresistant structure. Students complete the Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge independently. On a separate date, teams test their structures. In small groups, students begin their study of what causes earthquakes by completing the Plate Tectonics and Volcanoes activity. Day 6 Day 7 Section 2: Elements of Flight Planning Students learn more about the process of collecting and analyzing differential interferometric data. In pairs, students complete the Interpreting Interferograms activity. In pairs, students complete the Fight Plan Draft and share with their teams to reach consensus on the basics of the flight plan. As a class, students view the Online Flight Plan Tutorial and prepare for their day in the computer laboratory. Day 4 Students consider examples of G-III UAVSAR missions that were recently conducted. Teams reach consensus on site selection through sharing their findings (from Day 3) within their teams. Teams construct their argument for their selected site using the Argument Construction Worksheet. Teams draft their Presentation Flowchart – Site Selection. Day 8 Day 9 Day 10 COMPUTER LAB COMPUTER LAB COMPUTER LAB In pairs, students create their team flight plan using the G-III Online Flight Planning Tool. Each pair of students will create the same team plan; this will allow teams to compare plans and choose the best results for reporting. Day 5 Section 2 In the introduction to flight planning, students learn more about the GIII and UAVSAR instruments. Students observe a demonstration on the autopilot (Totally Tubular) and complete the Totally Tubular Algebra Problem Worksheet. Students learn how the UAVSAR takes images and how the area of data collection varies with altitude. In pairs, students complete the Swath Geometry Problem Set. Exam Presentations Culminating Activities Teams present Teams draft their Presentation Flowchart - Flight Plan. Teams work on their multimedia presentation. Teams conference with the teacher. Teams continue work on their multimedia presentation. Team conferences continue as needed. Teams complete their presentations independently. Students complete exam. their multimedia presentations Proposals are judged and top winners are selected for submission to NASA. Teacher Notes TEACHER RESOURCES FMC: IEM Teacher Kit - The FMC: IEM Teacher Kit is available from the NASA Dryden Education Resource Center and includes the following resources: Totally Tubular Demonstration California fault map (2 x 3 ft) U.S. fault map (2 x 3 ft) Sample aeronautical chart (2 x 3 ft) G-III Lithograph (8.5 x 11) Shake Table - For educators local to Palmdale, CA, a shake table may be checked out from the Aerospace Education Research and Operations (AERO) Institute. Non-local educators may purchase or create their own shaky table. We suggest the following possibilities: The AREES Shaky Table (instructions are provided in the appendix to this Educator Guide) o This table has been created and tested by AREES Master Educators. Pitsco EQs Tremor Table (www.pitsco.com) o Includes the Pitsco Earthquake Engineering book to guide students through the structure design and building process. Comes with five of the wood floor plates, five bolts and nuts, and 50 washers – enough to build one earthquake tower. Other Shaky Table models (these have not been tested) o Building a Shake Table, MCEER University of Buffalo (http://mceer.buffalo.edu/infoservice/Education/shaketableLessonPlan.asp) o Shake Table, USGS Emeritus Geophysicist (http://jclahr.com/science/earth_science/shake/) Online Flight Planning Tool –The UAVSAR Flight Planning map is a Google Maps flight planning tool developed specifically for NASA’s airborne radar called Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR), but in the future there are plans to make this a general flight planning tool that can be used by anyone. If you log into the site as a guest however you can already play with the tool and experiment with the interface. Some of the main features of the interface include drawing flight lines on the map, nudging them, adding them to the current flight plan, and reordering them. You can also add ground control points and search and select takeoff, landing, and intermediate airports. As the flight plan is constructed, all of its components are constantly being saved and the estimated flight times are updated on the fly. The tool requires Safari, Foxfire, or Chrome browser. It will not work properly in Internet Explorer. You may access the tool as a Guest or create an account. Once in the system, you should view several of the video tutorials, including: Getting Started Airport & Flight Lines: drag & drop Flight Line: add line using end point method Takeoff Airport: select airport Landing Airport: select airport Flight Plan Report (Generate Plan and View Previous Plans) If you don’t have access to a computer lab for your students, there are paper and pencil alternatives: Draw the flight plan on a fault map of California, the U.S. or other countries. Have students create a set of steps for their flight plan (similar to a MapQuest or Google Maps set of directions) BEFORE THE UNIT BEGINS One-Three Months Before Request FMC: IEM Kit from NASA Dryden Education Resource Center. Reserve your computer lab for a minimum of three days (Days 8-10). Insure that the UAVSR Web Flight Planning Tool (http://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl) is functional on computers in your lab and classroom. Install additional applications as needed. View the Video Tutorial and practice using the site. Insure that the online resources are accessible from computers in the lab and classroom. Install additional applications as needed. Identify tech support (school staff, advanced students, or community volunteers) who can assist with basic troubleshooting, the online flight planning tool, and multimedia production (presentations and podcasts) For Optional Extension Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge, obtain a shake table for testing student earthquake-resistant structures. Determine how students will respond to the Daily Log (i.e., in their Science Notebooks, online via a blog, or on separate sheets of paper) Two Weeks Before For Optional Extension Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge, purchase materials for building the earthquake-resistant structures. We recommend either Popsicle sticks and glue or spaghetti and marshmallows. Send Student Letter home to parents. Select members of student groups. Create a word wall for key vocabulary and terms. Print copies of the Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Student Handbook. For Optional Extension Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge , print copies of the Secondary Design Packet www.nasa.gov/pdf/324206main_Design_Packet_II.pdf OR the Elementary Design Packet http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/324205main_Design_Packet_I.pdf. Obtain permission for use of images and videos of students. One Week Before Receive FMC: IEM Kit from NASA and practice the Totally Tubular Demonstration. Download and review presentations from FMC: IEM CD or Website. Procure digital camera for taking photos and videos of activities. DURING THE UNIT: SECTION 1 IMPROVING EARTHQUAKE MONITORING Day 1: Introduction to Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring On Day 1, students are introduced to the Flight Mission Challenge and are assigned teams and roles. In teams and role-specific groups, students complete the Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm and Team Members worksheets. Prior to Day o Review introductory presentation and Jigsaw cooperative learning process. o Have the video clip ready for viewing. o Print copies of the FMC: IEM Student Workbook. Sequence of Class Activities: o Teacher shows the FMC: IEM Video clip to introduce students to the Flight Mission Challenge. o Teacher reads aloud the Letter to Students. o Students review Day 1 pages in their workbook. o Students are divided into teams and assigned roles. o Students complete Activity 1: Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm, including the Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm and Team Members worksheets. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Day 2: What Causes Earthquakes? In small groups, students begin their study of what causes earthquakes by completing the Plate Tectonics and Volcanoes activity. Prior to Day: o Review Lesson 5: Plate Tectonics and Volcanism of the Astro-Venture Geology Educator Guide (http://astroventure.arc.nasa.gov/teac hers/pdf/AV-Geolesson-5.pdf). This activity is part of a large curriculum unit and is organized in the 5E inquiry model and could easily take 2-3 days, instead of the one day allocated. The teacher’s resource is very detailed and worth a close review. o For a 1-day activity, we recommend the following: Engage, Steps 4-5 (page 7) Explore, Steps 1-6 (page 8-11) Explain, Steps 1-2 (pages 11-12) o Obtain a globe or world map (individual student or classroom size). o Print student copies of Astro-Journal Geology Lesson 5: Plate Tectonics and Volcanism (pages 17-19 if you are following our recommendations above). Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 2 pages in their workbook. o In small groups (size of group depends computer availability), students complete Activity 2: Plate Tectonics and Volcanoes as outlined above. o Students complete pages 17-19 of the Astro-Journal. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Day 3: Mitigating Earthquake Damage Students complete their study of earthquakes and consider how to mitigate earthquake damage. They also begin to identify possible site locations. Prior to Day: o Have NASA’s Electronic Map of the Earth (http://solidearth.jpl.nasa.gov/MEDIA/eq_map.mpg) ready to go. This is an animation of cumulative global earthquake occurrences from 1960 through 1995. Earthquakes are shown as yellow dots. o Consider using the real-time earthquake monitoring add-on tool for Google Earth found on the USGS site at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/catalogs/. You must first have Google Earth installed on your system. o The last Day 3 activity engages students in how to build an earthquake resistant building. It is worth having students read this information, even if you don’t plan to have them build a structure. You could always offer extra credit for the structurebuilding. Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 3 pages in their workbook. o In pairs, students complete their study of earthquakes by completing the Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes activity. Questions 1 and 2 help students make the transition from the theory of where earthquakes occur to what locations might benefit from NASA earthquake monitoring. The table helps students identify possible site locations. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Optional Extension: Quaky-Shaky Engineering Design Challenge In the Engineering Extension, student teams complete the QuakyShaky Design Challenge. Student teams construct and test an earthquake-resistant structure. Students complete the Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge independently. On a separate date, teams test their structures. Prior to Day: o Collect and organize materials for the Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge. We recommend either Popsicle sticks and glue or spaghetti and marshmallows. o Print copies of the Secondary Design Packet www.nasa.gov/pdf/324206main_Design_Packet_II.pd f OR the Elementary Design Packet http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/324205main_Design_Pack et_I.pdf. o Review the steps on the Design Packet of your choice. This is a wonderful way to have your students consider the design of their structure prior to building it. It also allows you to capture their thinking processes. o Make sure that your Shake table is in working condition. Find a place in your classroom where there is plenty of room for the device, and where it can be seen by students. o Obtain digital and video cameras to document student progress. Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review the Design Packet. o o o o o o Teacher demonstrates the Shake table so that students will understand the testing conditions. Students complete the first few steps (Identify the Problem, Identify Criteria and Constraints, Brainstorm Possible Solutions, Select a Design). Students create their model. Teacher tests student models after there has been plenty of drying time. Following the testing, students complete the remaining sections of the Design Packet (Evaluate, Refine the Design, and Share the Solution). During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Day 4: Site Selection Students consider examples of G-III UAVSAR missions that were recently conducted. Teams reach consensus on site selection through sharing their findings and construct their argument for their selected site using the Argument Construction Worksheet. Prior to Day: o Be sure that students with special reading needs have access to the vocabulary (via the glossary, a word wall, or other means) as they read the Digging into Earthquakes article. o You may want to have a large map of California faults available for demonstrating the mission location. (Technology tip: You may also use Google Earth to demonstrate this.) Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 4 pages in their workbook and read the article, Digging into Earthquakes. o Teacher uses a California map or Google Earth to demonstrate the scope of the mission data collection. o In teams, students discuss the two questions posted under Day 4. o In teams, students complete the Argument Construction Worksheet. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Notes: o This concludes the focus on earth and physical science content. o This would be a good point to assess student understanding of the science content in the lesson (i.e., Plate Tectonics, Earth’s Structure, Shaping Earth’s Surface, and Forces). You could choose a set of questions from the Multiple Choice Test Item Bank. DURING THE UNIT: SECTION 2 ELEMENTS OF FLIGHT PLANNING Day 5: The Mathematics of Earthquake Monitoring In this introduction to flight planning, students learn more about the G-III and UAVSAR instruments and how mathematics is involved in flight planning. Students observe a demonstration on the autopilot (Totally Tubular) and complete the Totally Tubular Algebra Problem Worksheet. Students learn how the UAVSAR takes images and how the area of data collection varies with altitude. In pairs, students complete the Swath Geometry Problem Set. Prior to Day: o Insure that the video clip on the Gulfstream-III is working and ready to view. o Prepare the Totally Tubular materials for the demonstration. Practice the demonstration as outlined in the Totally Tubular Demonstration Directions (page XX) Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 5 pages in their workbook. o Students view the Totally Tubular Demonstration. o Students complete the Totally Tubular Volume Problem Set. o Students complete the Swath Geometry Problem Set. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Notes: o Additional math activities on Air Traffic Control and distance-rate-time investigations may be found in the Smart Skies Curriculum (http://smartskies.nasa.gov/). These include Fly by Math and Line Up with Math. o The student workbook includes information about the NASA Future Flight Design (http://futureflight.arc.nasa.gov/), a web-based interactive, problem-based learning environment where students in grades 5-8 learn about forces of flight and design air transportation and aircraft systems of the future. Day 6: Understanding Differential Interferometry Students learn more about the process of collecting and analyzing differential interferometric data. In pairs, students complete the Interpreting Interferograms activity. Prior to Day: Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 6 pages in their workbook. o Students complete the Interpreting Interferograms Activity. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Day 7: Basics of Flight Planning In pairs, students complete the Fight Plan Draft and share with their teams to reach consensus on the basics of the flight plan. As a class, students view the Online Flight Plan Tutorial and prepare for their day in the computer laboratory. Prior to Day: o Insure that the UAVSR Web Flight Planning Tool (http://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/cgibin/login.pl) is accessible and ready for your demonstration. o Have printed copies of or links to maps of California, the U.S. and/or the world. Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 7 pages in their workbook. o Student teams complete the Flight Plan Draft. o Optional: Students plot their flight plan (takeoff airport, departure airport, and estimated locations of three data takes) on a printed map. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Notes o If students do not have access to computers, we recommend that you still demonstrate the online tool. Then students can model the same results on printed maps. Day 8: Web Flight Planning Tool In pairs, students will create their team flight plan using the G-III Online Flight Planning Tool. Each pair of students will create the same team plan; this will allow teams to compare plans and choose the best results for reporting. Prior to Day: o Insure that the UAVSR Web Flight Planning Tool (http://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/cgibin/login.pl) is accessible on the computers in the lab. Recruit some volunteers to assist students. Possibilities include the school/district tech support staff, computer lab aide or instructor, advanced students, or even students who completed the assignment in an earlier period. Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 8 pages in their workbook. o Student pairs complete the flight plan. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Notes: o If the online planning tool is not available, have students create flight plans using a printed map and as a set of directions. You can model this approach using MapQuest or Google Maps. o Students should be sure to save both printed and digital versions of their summary, maps, and configuration files. Day 9: Planning the Multimedia Presentation Teams complete the Creating the Argument for Your Proposal: Defending Your Flight Plan and draft their Multimedia Proposal Flowchart Flight Plan. Teams make decisions on which flight plan to use in their presentation and work on their multimedia proposal. Teams confer with the teacher to receive feedback on strengths and weaknesses. Prior to Day: o Identify rotation for team conferences. One approach is to quickly dispatch the teams who are working effectively, and then focus on the teams with greater needs. An opposite approach is to focus on the teams with greater needs and then meet with more effective teams as time permits. Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 9 pages in their workbook. o As a team, students complete the Creating the Argument for Your Proposal and draft their Multimedia Proposal Flowchart Flight Plan. o Teams review the Proposal Checklist and Scoring Guide and identify strengths and areas of improvement for their multimedia project on their Pre-Conference Form. They conference with the teacher and receive feedback. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Day 10: Creating the Multimedia Presentation Teams work on their multimedia proposals, using whatever applications are available. Team conferences continue as needed. Prior to Day: o Consider whether you’d like to provide a day of training on one or more of the applications available for multimedia. Recruit volunteers to provide training and/or support as needed. Sequence of Class Activities: o Students review Day 10 pages in their workbook. o Students work in teams to create their multimedia proposals. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. Culminating Activities Teams present their multimedia proposals. Proposals are judged and top winners are selected for submission to NASA. Students may also be assed via a multiple choice assessment created from the test bank provided. Prior to Day: o Print copies of the Multimedia Proposal Critique form (4 to a page). o Decide how students will showcase their proposals and plan the rotation schedule if appropriate. Consider these showcase possibilities: Teams present to whole class; entire class critiques each proposal. Teams present to another class; entire class critiques each proposal. Teams load their multimedia proposals on a class wiki. Individually or in pairs, students review and critique proposals. Sequence of Class Activities: o Multimedia proposals are presented and critiqued. o During the last five minutes (or as homework), students respond to the Daily Log. AFTER THE UNIT Make notes for next year’s implementation. Repack and return FMC: IEM Kit to NASA. Assist selected students in completing Challenge paperwork for submission to NASA. Share student projects with school/district administrators and community/family members. Multiple Choice Questions Test Bank Earthquake Monitoring 1. At which type of plate boundary do strike-slip faults occur? a. Divergent b. Convergent c. Dinner d. Transform 2. At which type of plate boundary do normal faults occur? a. Divergent b. Convergent c. Dinner d. Transform 3. At which type of boundary do reverse faults occur? a. Divergent b. Convergent c. Dinner d. Transform 4. What type of plate boundary is involved in the San Andreas Fault? a. Convergent b. Divergent c. Transform d. Tension Flight Planning 5. What is a flight plan? a. Provides a general overview of the flight objectives b. A lesson plan to give to the passengers c. Provides multiple stops that the aircraft will take d. Informs other pilots of your intent 6. Who is in charge of conducting the pre-flight for an aircraft? a. The person who owns the aircraft b. The airport where the plane is located c. The pilot in command is responsible for determining that the airplane is safe for flight d. Palmdale Airport 7. When should you have your flight plan completed? a. Your plan should be completed two weeks before take off b. Your plan should be completed one week before take off c. Your plan should be completed during flight d. Your plan should be completed before takeoff. 8. Why is communication so important for pilots when talking to various towers? a. To avoid in air accidents. b. It is a professional courtesy. c. It is a mandatory process. d. To confirm aircraft policies. 9. To get a complete weather briefing for the planned flight, the pilot should: a. Request a standard briefing b. Request an abbreviated briefing c. Request a general briefing d. Listen to the radio 10. How will you ensure that you will have enough fuel to arrive at your destination? a. You should know how much fuel is in the fuel tanks b. You should know the distance to your destination c. You should know the “fuel burn” data of your aircraft d. All of the above 11. If your aircraft burn 500 gallons per hour and you have 5500 gallons of fuel on board (plus 250 gallons reserve), what is your maximum flight time? a. 11 hours b. 9 hours c. 5 hours d. 4 hours 12. If your aircraft burns an average of 3600 pounds of fuel per hour and you have 23,400 pounds of fuel on board, what is your maximum flight time (with a reserve of 1800 pounds of fuel)? a. 4 hours b. 3 hours c. 6 hours d. 12 hours 13. If you have 6 hours of fuel and your mission requires 2 hours on station for data collection, what is your operating radius? How far can you fly? a. 4 hours round trip b. 2 hours round trip c. 3 hours round trip d. 5 hours round trip 14. If you have 12 hours of fuel and your mission requires 4 hours on station for data collection, what is your operating radius? How far can you fly? a. 5 hours round trip b. 7 hours round trip c. 6 hours round trip d. 4 hours round trip 15. If a G-III flies for 5 hours and covers a distance of approximately 2250 nautical miles, what is the average airspeed? a. 11250 miles per hour b. 450 miles per hour c. 2250 miles per hour d. 400 miles per hour 16. Flying a mission on the G-III, what is the sensor that is on board that will measure fault lines, soil moisture, etc.? a. ABCFGH b. UBAND c. UAVSAR d. Alerion 17. How high can the G-III fly when gathering data? a. Around 40,000 feet b. Around 30,000 feet c. Around 90,000 feet d. Around 60,000 feet 18. What is the full name of the acronym UAVSAR? a. Ultraviolet Acceleration Vehicle Soaring Above Rain b. Useful Antelope Valley System for Attacking Resources c. Unmanned Air Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar d. Another Government Program 19. What does a SAR system do? a. Provide Search And Rescue system for downed pilots b. Search for wildfires in California’s forests c. Search for extraterrestrial life on other planets d. Provide a highly accurate radar system 20. The UAVSAR takes images a. From the front b. To the left c. To the right d. From the back 21. True or False: It does not matter how high the G-III is flying for the UAVSAR to take the images. a. True b. False 22. The UAVSAR is a remote sensor that uses a. Microwaves b. Radio waves c. X-rays d. Infrared waves 23. The UAVSAR is mounted on the G-III’s a. b. c. d. Wings Nose Belly Tail 24. The G-III flies a series of lines to obtain data. These lines are a. Perpendicular b. Zig zag c. Parallel d. Curved 25. When the UAVSAR is working, the G-III is controlled by a. Autopilot b. Copilot c. Pilot on the ground d. None of the above Engineering 26. True or False: Engineering is a branch of science. a. True b. False Match the definition with the step in the design process. 27. The only way to know if your design will work in real-world conditions is to build a model, or prototype, and then see if it works. a. Identify the Challenge b. Research and Brainstorm c. Select the Best Solution d. Test Solution e. Evaluate Solution f. Build Design 28. You need to recognize the heart of any problem before attempting to solve it. You must also know the constraints placed upon you. Are there any size, weight, or budget limitations? a. Identify the Challenge b. Research and Brainstorm c. Select the Best Solution d. Test Solution e. Evaluate Solution f. Build Design 29. Once you've settled on an idea to develop, prepare detailed drawings and engineering plans and solicit feedback. These designs may need to be modified depending on any feedback you receive. a. Identify the Challenge b. Research and Brainstorm c. Select the Best Solution d. Test Solution e. Evaluate Solution f. Build Design 30. This is the last step - where you complete the project by creating the version that should work! a. Identify the Challenge b. Research and Brainstorm c. Select the Best Solution d. Test Solution e. Evaluate Solution f. Build Design 31. If your initial design doesn't fully solve the problem or meet the challenge (or can't do so for the money you have to spend), go back and repeat the above steps. You'll know what doesn't work and be in a better position to develop an idea that does. a. Identify the Challenge b. Research and Brainstorm c. Select the Best Solution d. Test Solution e. Evaluate Solution f. Build Design 32. Explore the problem, requirements, and materials available. Has the challenge been met before? If so, how? If not, why not? Then, because the best solution to a problem is not always the first idea conceived, exchange ideas in an open forum. a. Identify the Challenge b. Research and Brainstorm c. Select the Best Solution d. Test Solution e. Evaluate Solution f. Build Design 33. Why is engineering sometimes referred to as the invisible profession? a. Because there are so few engineers. b. Because many engineers work on top-secret or proprietary projects. c. Because it isn’t officially part of the school curriculum. d. Because often engineers work behind the scenes. Assessment Timeline Assessment can be a tool for understanding what students are learning. Research suggests that ongoing assessment provides critical feedback about learning to students and instructors and increases learning gains. The assessments in this unit include entry level, to progress-monitoring, to summative. Entry level (EL) assessments are designed to assess what students currently know and engage them in the learning. The entry level assessment for this unit is a Quick Write on the Flight Mission Challenge problem. Progress monitoring (PM) activities assess student progress toward learning goals and may also inform teacher and students of need for re-teaching, re-learning, and/or revision. Progress monitoring activities in this unit include demonstration of science and math content knowledge and skills necessary to move forward in the project as well as checklists and daily logs to monitor the progress toward completion of the final product. Summative (S) assessments determine whether learning outcomes have been achieved and provide for the evaluation of a product. The Flight Mission Challenge product (in the form of a multimedia presentation) evaluation is accessed via an analytic or holistic rubric. Student achievement of math, science, language arts, technology, and engineering content and skills may also be assessed via a final examination. The timeline below demonstrates how activities could be distributed among language arts, science, mathematics, and technology teachers. Type Day Assessment Content Areas Science Mathematics Language Arts Technology Section 1: Improving Earthquake Monitoring FMC: IEM Daily Log PM All S Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm (Activity 1.1) EL Day 1 S Team Members (Activity 1.1) EL Day 1 PM Day 2 Plate Tectonics and Volcanoes (Activity 1.2) S PM Day 3 Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes (Activity 1.3) S PM Day 4 Argument Construction (Activity 1.4) S PM Extra Design Packet (Engineering Extension) S Section 2: Elements of Flight Planning PM Day 5 Totally Tubular Volume Problem Set (Activity 2.1) PM Day 5 Swath Geometry Problem Set (Activity 2.2) PM Day 6 Interpreting Interferograms Worksheet (Activity 2.1) S PM Day 7 Flight Plan Draft (Activity 2.3) PM Day 8 Presentation Flowchart – Flight Plan (Activity 2.4) S The Flight Mission Challenge PM Day 9 Pre-Conference Form PM/S Day 9 Proposal Checklist and Scoring Guide Summative Assessments S All FMC: IEM Multimedia Presentation Rubric S S Final Unit Examination S Engineering M LA LA E E LA E M M M M M LA T T LA T LA LA T T E E E Research-Based Instructional Strategies for Engaging and Supporting All Students Several strategies are recommended to insure that all students are engaged and supported in learning: COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: Consider the linguistic, interpersonal, and academic abilities of your students when selecting team members and create teams that maximize success for all students. When possible, avoid “singlets,” which is the accident of placing just one student from a subgroup per team. This can increase feelings of isolation and marginalization. When appropriate, team a student with limited English language ability or special needs with a peer who is willing and able to assist. Given the amount of time students will spend with their team members, you may want to consider assigning rather than allowing students to select specific roles. The Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm will also support your diverse student populations, including English language learners, by allowing all students in the same role to share ideas with and collect ideas from others in their role group. It is important to let students know that they are providing leadership in the activities associated with their role. They are not limited to only completing activities associated with their role. Instead, they are expected to involve other team members. They are also expected to be involved in all of the activities that the team is completing. Point out that the rubric used to assess the final project includes consideration of how the team worked collaboratively and cooperatively. The quality of the multimedia presentation is based in part on the criteria that each team member makes important contributions which are identified in the final version. MAKE IT MULTIDISCIPLINARY: The unit was designed to be implemented by one or multiple teachers. Consider co-teaching this unit with colleagues who have access to technology resources – such as the computer or AVID instructors. Activities could be easily distributed among English/language arts, science, mathematics, and technology teachers. See the Assessment Timeline for ways the activities could be divided. TECHNOLOGY ACCESS: Make the effort to provide access to technology infrastructure, hardware, software, and support. Don’t let the need for multimedia scare you (or your students). Although use of multimedia is critical to the success of the proposal, the evaluation of the proposal will be based mostly on the content of the site selection argument and flight plan. o Students could use video, podcasting, PowerPoint, or a combination of these and more. o At a minimum, most school computer labs include access to PowerPoint, which may include animation and voice narration, be set to run automatically, and saved as a PowerPoint Show that will open automatically. Book your school technology lab so that your students have plenty of time to conduct Internet research, create their flight plan, and develop their multimedia presentation during class (and school hours). This will increase equality for those students who do not have access to a computer or the Internet at home. Equip your classroom computer with the hardware and software needed to create high quality multimedia presentations. Invite student teams to “sign up” during available times. Inform students of technology resources at the local library. Consider building student teams around those students with access to needed technology resources (i.e., Internet-connected computers, video equipment, and multimedia software programs). Provide “training” to students who are not as technologically advanced by offering after school workshops in podcasting, video production, or PowerPoint. Even better—ask advanced students, or those completing advanced technology courses, to provide the training or individualized tutoring before/after school. 21st CENTURY LEARNING: Use Web 2.0 tools to keep your students organized, engaged, and productive. Post project resources on a class wiki to make it easy for students to access checklists, logs, and project requirements. Post updates on NASA missions and resources. Encourage students to maintain a digital log of their progress, including digital images of their activities. This could be facilitated by use of student cell phones, so consider approaching your administrator for special permission to use cell phones for educational purposes ACADEMIC LITERACY: Develop students’ academic literacy through daily strategies that engage students in reading, writing, and speaking academic vocabulary. Model the use of the scientific method and engineering design process by having students maintain a project notebook with Daily Logs. A list of Daily Log suggestions is provided in the following section. Use a variety of vocabulary development strategies to develop students’ academic literacy, such as a word wall, notebook glossary, foldables, and picture flashcards. Try the Science/Non-Science Activity: o In small groups, have students create a set of sentences for the following terms. The first set of sentences use the term as it pertains to science; the second set of sentences use the term in a non-science context. Invite student groups to switch papers and evaluate whether the non-science sentences are really non-science. Example in which the science term isn’t related to the non-science context: Science - The fault ran right under the California freeway. Non-science - It isn’t my fault that the dog ate the burger. Example in which the science term is related to the non-science context: The earthquake registered a 5.1 on the scale. Susan was quaking at the thought of the upcoming exam. o This activity is designed to develop academic literacy as well as help students realize how our common vocabulary is often derived from scientific terms. o Possible terms: quake, fault, engineer, model, probability, baseline, mission, deformation, plate, stress, radar, mitigate, natural, hazard, altitude, swath, pod Daily Log Questions DL 1: How is NASA improving earthquake monitoring and what can you do to help? DL 2: What have you learned about earthquakes? DL 3: How do we mitigate earthquake damage? DL 4: What progress is my team making on its site selection argument? How am I contributing? DL 5: How do the G-III and UAVSAR do their jobs? DL 6: How will UAVSAR interferogram data help us mitigate earthquake damage? DL 7: What does your flight plan include? DL 8: How did the online flight planning tool help you create a flight plan that is accurate and comprehensive? DL 9: How is your multimedia proposal progressing? DL 10: What have you learned about how NASA is improving earthquake monitoring? Multimedia Proposal Critique Quality and Strength of Argument for Site Selection Quality, Accuracy, and Cost Efficiency of Flight Plan Quality of Multimedia Proposal 1 2 3 POOR 1 5 EXCELLENT 2 3 POOR 1 4 4 5 EXCELLENT 2 3 POOR 4 5 EXCELLENT Multimedia Proposal Critique Quality and Strength of Argument for Site Selection Quality, Accuracy, and Cost Efficiency of Flight Plan Quality of Multimedia Proposal Strengths Strengths Improvements Needed Improvements Needed Multimedia Proposal Critique Quality and Strength of Argument for Site Selection Quality, Accuracy, and Cost Efficiency of Flight Plan Quality of Multimedia Proposal 1 2 3 POOR 1 1 5 EXCELLENT 2 3 POOR POOR 4 4 5 EXCELLENT 2 3 4 5 EXCELLENT 1 2 3 POOR 1 2 3 POOR 1 4 5 EXCELLENT 4 5 EXCELLENT 2 3 POOR 4 5 EXCELLENT Multimedia Proposal Critique Quality and Strength of Argument for Site Selection Quality, Accuracy, and Cost Efficiency of Flight Plan Quality of Multimedia Proposal Strengths Strengths Improvements Needed Improvements Needed 1 2 3 POOR 1 2 3 POOR 1 POOR 4 5 EXCELLENT 4 5 EXCELLENT 2 3 4 5 EXCELLENT Totally Tubular Demonstration Directions The Totally Tubular Demonstration allows students to see the differences in how a plane flies through the “tube” of space with and without the autopilot. A video tutorial of this demonstration is found at XXX. Materials from the FMC: IEM Teacher Kit: Acrylic Totally Tubular Demonstration tube set Fishing line filament that stretches the length of one tube, secured to a cross straw at either end. 2 plastic straws for blowing through (more if you want the students to try) Two G-III paper airplanes – 3 inches long, 2 inch wingspan, 1.5 inch end of airplane 1-inch plastic straw piece attached to one of the planes Procedures: 1. Set up the Totally Tubular Demonstration as shown above. Picture of completed airplane 2. Make paper G-III airplanes. A reproducible copy of the G-II model is provided on the following page. You need a paper airplane that is 3 inches long, with a 2 inch wingspan. Most importantly, the back end of the airplane must be about 1.5 inches to allow for creation of the pocket that holds the straw to blow through. 3. Cut out planes, and a back for each plane. Put a thin bead of glue on outside edges, leave bottom edge open, creating a pocket. 4. Place drinking straw into pocket. 5. To demonstrate how the G-III would fly without autopilot, send one airplane through the empty tube. To do this, stick the straw in the pocket of the airplane model and gently blow. The airplane should be blown off the straw with enough force to send it through the tube. 6. To demonstrate how the G-III flies with the autopilot, use the tube with the filament. This represents the autopilot. Tape a 1-inch segment of a plastic straw to the bottom of the paper GIII. This represents the UAVSAR. Thread the autopilot filament through the straw, replace stick brace on outside of tube. Insert the straw again into the pocket and blow with enough force to send the plane through the tube. Discussion: What do each of the following parts of the model represent? o Filament in the tube (answer: autopilot) o 1-inch segement of straw under one of the airplanes (answer: UAVSAR) o Plastic tube (answer: the volume of airspace that the plane must fly within to provide accurate data) Why did one plane flight straighter than the other? What are the important measurements that must be aligned in order for the autopilot to work? o Wingspan of plane o Length of tube o Diameter of tube Follow-Up Activity Students complete the Totally Tubular Volume Worksheet to explore the relationship between the dimensions of the plane and tube. Reproducible model of G-III airplane FLIGHT MISSION CHALLENGE: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Student Workbook Letter to Students Letter to Students The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is gaining a better understanding of earthquakes in California thanks to a specially modified jet, the Gulfstream-III. NASA engineers use radar to collect data on how quakes change the Earth’s surface, which may eventually help scientists predict earthquakes. NASA hopes to collect baseline data in critical areas in order to improve our understanding of how quakes affect not only the immediate area of the quake, but also the state of stress in the surrounding faults. This will help them improve their forecast models of quake probability and magnitude. NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center is in process of identifying several new areas to collect baseline data on earthquake surface distortions. We invite teams of students in grades 5-9 to submit proposals for the site for new science missions. Proposals will be reviewed and ranked by a team of NASA scientists and engineers and the winning team will earn a visit to the Dryden Flight Research Center in Palmdale, California. Proposals will be evaluated in three areas: strength of argument for site selection, accuracy and cost efficiency of flight plan, and quality of digital and oral proposal presentation. With the goal of assembling the best team possible, each team member will be assigned an expert role. You’ll want to include at least one of each of the following experts. If your team is small, then some members may need to fulfill more than one role. Mission Scientist Flight Engineer/Flight Operations Specialist UAVSAR Technology Specialist Mission Director/Project Manager Pilot Multimedia Technology Specialist Through the activities and independent research, student teams will: Select a site for earthquake monitoring Prepare a flight plan Develop a multimedia proposal to submit to NASA NASA hopes that you will consider this opportunity to investigate, evaluate, design, and present a solution for a real world problem that will not only contribute to our knowledge of how earthquakes shape the surface of the earth, but also inform our understanding of environmental hazards at the global level. Section 1: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Day 1 Introduction to Earthquake Monitoring The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is gaining a better understanding of earthquakes in California thanks to a specially modified jet, the Gulfstream-III. NASA engineers use radar to collect data on how quakes change the Earth’s surface, which may eventually help scientists predict earthquakes. NASA hopes to collect baseline data in critical areas in order to improve our understanding of how quakes affect not only the immediate area of the quake, but also the state of stress in the surrounding faults. This will help them improve their forecast models of quake probability and magnitude. NASA’s ongoing mission to improve earthquake monitoring is summarized in Earthquake Imaging Mission Newscast. In this video clip, you will also be introduced to Tim Moes, G-III UAVSAR Project Manager. Introducing the Flight Mission Challenge As of fall 2010, baseline data on earthquake surface distortions has been collected throughout California and a few other regions, such as Haiti and the Dominican Republic. The primary challenge of the Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring is to identify where, how, and why additional baseline data should be collected. This ongoing mission provides an opportunity for you to contribute to the challenge of improving earthquake monitoring across the United States and throughout the world. To begin, read the Letter to Students to learn more about NASA’s earthquake mission challenge. Picture of G-III UAVSAR collecting data or of Newscast Establishing Teams To begin the challenge, you will be grouped into teams. The mission team brings together science and engineering experts responsible for flight planning. The mission director, flight engineers, technology specialists, and scientists will all play a crucial role in the adventure, providing the pilot with data crucial for developing and following his flight plan. Because you are expected to present your proposal with using multimedia, you will also need an expert multimedia technology expert. Each team member will be assigned an expert role, with the goal of assembling the best team possible. You’ll want to include at least one of each of the following experts. If your team is small, then some members may need to fulfill more than one role. Mission Scientist Flight Engineer: Flight Operations Specialist Technology Specialist (UAVSAR) Mission Director/Project Manager Pilot Technology Specialist (Multimedia) Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm YOUR TITLE YOUR PROFESSION Describe your area of expertise and role in flight missions. YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES Record items within the Letter to Students that are related to your role YOUR IDEAS Brainstorm ideas you have for fulfilling the responsibilities of your position. OTHER IDEAS Record ideas of others in your group. YOUR REPORT Identify the top three ways you can support your team in meeting the NASA Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring. Be ready to share with your team. Team Members Title/Student Name Mission Scientist Flight Engineer: Flight Operations Specialist Technology Specialist (UAVSAR) Mission Director/Project Manager Pilot Technology Specialist (Multimedia) Contributions Picture of G-III UAVSAR team Your first activity as a team is to develop familiarity with the Flight Mission Challenge and identify ways that each team member can contribute to the solution. You will begin this process in Activity 1.1 Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm. Activity 1.1 Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm In this activity, you will “jigsaw” out of your team and into your role-specific group, where you will learn more about your areas of expertise and ways you can contribute to your team’s solution to the Challenge. View the video clip on your career field with the members of your group. Take notes on the responsibilities of your job. Then study the Flight Mission Challenge and brainstorm ways you can contribute to the solution of the Challenge. Record ideas and information on the Jigsaw Challenge Brainstorm. Share your ideas with the group and add additional thoughts to your worksheet. Be ready to share your top ideas with your team. When you return to your team, the Project Manager will hold a team briefing to share what everyone has learned. Each team member should complete the list of Team Members. Save your materials in your science notebook and respond to the Daily Log: DL 1: How is NASA improving earthquake monitoring and what can you do to help? CAREERS Day 2 Earthquakes: From Cause to Impact Your first task is to develop a working knowledge of earthquakes. Where do they occur? Which areas are in most danger? Answers to these questions will help you select a site that could benefit from future earthquake monitoring. According to the theory of plate tectonics, the surface of the Earth is composed of many individual plates that move and interact, constantly changing and reshaping Earth's outer layer. Volcanoes and earthquakes both result from the movement of tectonic plates. Earthquakes are the Earth's natural means of releasing stress. When the Earth's plates move against each other, they put forces on themselves and each other. When the force is large enough, the crust is forced to break. When the break occurs, the stress is released as energy which moves through the Earth in the form of waves, which we call an earthquake. Activity 1.2 Plate Tectonics and Volcanism Figure 1 from Astro-Venture: Geology Educator Guide To develop your expertise in earthquakes, you explore the theory of plate tectonics. You will be able to use this theory to predict where earthquakes and volcanoes are most likely to occur. When you have completed the activity, be sure to respond to the Daily Log: DL 2: What have you learned about earthquakes? Picture of Seismometer within a few centimeters, measuring the slow buildup of deformation along faults and mapping ground deformation after earthquakes occur. The Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) is one of their newest Picture of G-III UAVSAR Day 3 How Scientists Monitor Earthquakes Scientists use a broad array of tools to "listen" to the San Andreas and other faults, looking for clues about their past, present and future behavior. These tools include ground-based technologies such as seismometers, creepmeters, and stressmeters. They also employ complex computer models such as QuakeSim. Picture of QuakeSim tools. Activity 1.3 Tectonic Plates and Earthquakes In this activity, you will use NASA’s Electronic Map of the Earth to select three regions that might benefit from earthquake monitoring. This map demonstrates the relationship between earthquakes and volcanoes and the boundaries of tectonic plates. Complete the corresponding worksheet, Tectonic Plates and Earthquakes. In addition to traditional tools, scientists are now using space-based technologies which are capable of imaging minute Earth movements to Tectonic Plates and Earthquakes NASA’s Electronic Map of the Earth demonstrates you the relationship between earthquakes and volcanoes and the boundaries of tectonic plates. Click on play to view the action, and then answer the questions below. Work in pairs or triads to complete this worksheet. Be prepared to share your answers with your team. 1. Compare the distribution of volcanoes to the distribution of earthquakes. How are they similar? How do they differ? 2. There are some volcanoes and earthquakes that are not located at plate boundaries. How might you explain their locations? 3. Use a world map to identify three cities which are situated along plate boundaries where there is significant volcanic and earthquake activity. Consider whether any of these sites would be competitive in the Flight Mission Challenge. In what ways would each of these areas benefit from improved earthquake monitoring data? How is the U.S. partnership with this area important? What resources does this area have for earthquake damage mitigation? City/ Benefit to Area Benefit to U.S. Resources Available Country WHY MONITOR EARTHQUAKES? WHO WANTS TO KNOW? Picture of earthquake damage Mitigating the Impact of Earthquakes Before you make your final decision on site location, there are two further questions to consider. How do we mitigate earthquake damage? Who is involved in decisions regarding response to and resources for dealing with natural hazards such as earthquake damage? Earthquakes are frightening and potentially dangerous because they strike suddenly, often violently, and without warning. Depending on the severity of the earthquake, the results can be devastating in terms of damage to infrastructures and property as well as severe injury and loss of lives. Scientists want to know more about forces that shape the earth. Engineers want to know what causes damage so that they can design earthquake-resistant buildings and structures. State and federal authorities want to evaluate risks so that they can make decisions. For example: The fire department and police want to position resources to be ready for emergencies. City planners want to establish policy on housing zones and building codes. Families want to know the risks before they make decisions where to live and work. WHY DO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHERE EARTHQUAKES ARE MOST LIKELY TO OCCUR? Picture of shaky structure Earthquake mitigation can be structural, locational, or operational. Structural mitigation involves resisting or avoiding earthquake forces via hardware solutions. Improved earthquake monitoring can inform decisions about where to enforce strict building codes such as structural bracing or height of a structure. Locational mitigation typically avoids earthquake effects via alternative land uses. Improved earthquake monitoring can inform decisions about areas to restrict or limit building. Operational mitigation refers to emergency planning and related measures that respond to earthquake effects to reduce the impacts to acceptable levels. The Great California Shake-Out is an example of an operational mitigation measure. This statewide event is designed to increase public knowledge of how to prepare for and what to do in an earthquake emergency. Engineering Extension: Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge Mechanical and civil engineers play a major role in the reduction of damage caused by earthquakes. They design earthquake resistant structures, propose building codes, and recommend the strategic positioning of resources for quick response. In this activity, you will assume the roles of a team of engineers and design and test an earthquake-resistant structure. The goal is to build a structure from limited building materials that can withstand movement on a “shaky table.” To get started, read the article, Earthquake (Worldbook at NASA). The entire article is interesting, but the most important section is called “How to Build,” which is included in the shaded box to the right. You will use the NASA Engineering Design Packet, which includes a five-step design process: Ask, Imagine, Build, Evaluate, and Share. As you plan and develop your structure, you will answer questions about each step of their design process. This open-ended packet can be applied to any design project and can be used to enhance existing curriculum. Additional ideas for creating your structure are found in the activity sheet, Quaky-Shaky Design Challenge. When you have completed the activity, be sure to respond to the Daily Log: DL 3: How do we mitigate earthquake damage? How to Build an Earthquake Resistant Building (from Worldbook at NASA) Engineers have developed a number of ways to build earthquake-resistant structures. Their techniques range from extremely simple to fairly complex. For small- to medium-sized buildings, the simpler reinforcement techniques include bolting buildings to their foundations and providing support walls called shear walls. Shear walls, made of reinforced concrete (concrete with steel rods or bars embedded in it) help strengthen the structure and help resist rocking forces. Shear walls in the center of a building, often around an elevator shaft or stairwell, form what is called a shear core. Walls may also be reinforced with diagonal steel beams in a technique called cross-bracing. Builders also protect medium-sized buildings with devices that act like shock absorbers between the building and its foundation. These devices, called base isolators, are usually bearings made of alternate layers of steel and an elastic material, such as synthetic rubber. Base isolators absorb some of the sideways motion that would otherwise damage a building. Skyscrapers need special construction to make them earthquake-resistant. They must be anchored deeply and securely into the ground. They need a reinforced framework with stronger joints than an ordinary skyscraper has. Such a framework makes the skyscraper strong enough and yet flexible enough to withstand an earthquake. McNally, Karen C. "Earthquake." World Book Online Reference Center. 2005. World Book, Inc. http://www.worldbookonline.com/wb/Article?id=ar171680. Located at Worldbook at NASA http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/earthquake_worldbook.html. Quaky-Shaky Engineering Design Challenge Earthquakes can be exciting to study but they also can be very devastating to a community when they happen. Bridges, roads, houses, and other structures are all vulnerable to earthquakes. In many cases the disaster is the result of poor building practices. In this activity, you will participate in an engineering design experience to observe how sudden acceleration as experienced during an earthquake can lead to structural failure. You will also discover what building characteristics most affect stability. Designing Your Structure You may use whatever materials your teacher provides – Popsicle sticks and glue or spaghetti and small marshmallows work great. Remember that the base of structure should be 35 x 35 cm2 piece of double-layer corrugated cardboard, and the structure itself must be no wider than 30 x 30 cm2. The structure should be attached to the cardboard base using only paper clips, Elmer’s glue, twisty ties, string, and/or rubber bands. During testing, your structure will be shaken at various drill speeds, beginning with the lowest setting first. The structure will not be tested at the next highest drill setting if either: (1) displacement of structure exceeds >2 corners from cardboard base or (2) structure fails (i.e. can no longer support its own weight). Document Your Planning Use the Secondary Design Packet (www.nasa.gov/pdf/3 24206main_Design_Pa cket_II.pdf) to document your design development through the eight-step engineering design process: Identify the Problem; Identify Criteria and Constraints; Brainstorm Possible Solutions; Select a Design; Build a Model or Prototype; Test the Model and Evaluate; Refine the Design; and Share the Solution. You will also want to take plenty of pictures of the process! G-III UAVSAR in Hawaii or Haiti Day 4 and might be in the form of quotes, graphics, images, or audio/video clips. The argument should address the following issues: How the area would benefit from improved earthquake monitoring data. How the U.S. and NASA will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring in this area. How scientists, engineers, state and federal authorities, fire departments, police, and families would benefit. What resources for damage mitigation are available in the area. The impact of the location on flight planning and how you will maximize or minimize the impacts (covered in Section 2). Activity 1.4: Selecting the Site for the Flight Mission Challenge Read the article, Digging into Earthquakes: Radar Track Changes in Earth’s Surface. This article explains how the G-III UAVSAR has been used for earthquake monitoring missions. In your team, discuss these two questions: How does the UAVSAR allows scientists to track changes in the Earth’s surface? What are the responsibilities of each mission flight crew (i.e., pilot, scientist, co-pilot, mission manager)? The Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring requires that you propose a site location that future earthquake monitoring and present an argument that justifies your selection. The persuasiveness of your argument for site location comprises 50% of your score on the evaluation rubric. Review the rubric and highlight the criteria related to this part of the Challenge. Your team’s argument should include multiple reasons that are backed up with evidence. Evidence can include data, logic, and opinions STEPS TO DEVELOPING YOUR ARGUMENT Share your top three locations identified in the Plate Tectonics, Earthquakes, and Volcanoes Worksheet. As a group, reach consensus on which site holds the most promise. Complete the Argument Construction Worksheet. Keep track of references and save supporting evidence (graphics, images, audio/video clips) for use in your multimedia presentation. Complete the Argument Flowchart. Save your work. When you have completed the activity, be sure to respond to the Daily Log: DL 4: What progress is my team making on its site selection argument? How am I contributing? Digging Into Earthquakes: Radar Tracks Changes in Earth’s Surface Cruising along at more than 400 mph and 40,000 feet above the ground may seem an unlikely position for studying earthquakes, but that is exactly what scientists with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory are doing, with the aviation assistance of NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Using radar originally designed for unmanned aerial vehicles but being flown aboard a NASA business jet, scientists are able to take extremely detailed images of the Earth below. The radar, known as the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR), allows scientists to track minute changes in the Earth’s surface— as small as one millimeter—such as those created along a fault line following an earthquake. Data collected by the radar system, which is housed in a pod attached beneath the business jet’s fuselage, may be used to create predictive models by giving scientists a greater understanding of the processes occurring beneath the earth. “What we’re most interested in is what happens to that stress,” said Jay Parker, acting principal investigator for the project at JPL. “But it’s deep within the Earth. We can’t see it.” In repeated passes over an area, the radar is able to measure surface deformities by comparing one pass with another. The data are processed to create highdefinition photography of how things move, Parker said. “The resolution is extra-ordinarily high,” he said. “It’s a very detailed picture.” The picture is overlaid onto maps to see how it corresponds with known faults. The platform that makes this study possible is a business jet equipped with a precision navigation system that enables the aircraft to fly an exact path repeatedly. The Platform Precision Autopilot, developed by Dryden Flight Research Center, ties into the autopilot system on the Gulfstream III jet. “It lies to the airplane that is’ on an approach (for landing)” said NASA pilot Dick Ewers. This keeps the aircraft aligned on a precise path for the required data gathering. The system uses GPS for the highly accurate navigation necessary to repeat the same passes over and over again. Using the PPA, the aircraft flies inside a virtual tube 30 feet in diameter, maintaining that position over 200 miles while flying over 400 mph. A recent data-gathering mission took off from the Dryden Aircraft Operation Facility in Palmdale, where the Gulfstream is based, and spent about six hours crisscrossing a section of Southern California stretching from the Antelope Valley south to roughly Riverside. Each leg of the mission ran east and west, from the eastern deserts roughly in line with Twenty-nine Palms to the Pacific Ocean, making tight turns over the Channel Islands for the eastbound legs. Each of the nine legs of the mission was about 180 to 200 miles long and averaged about 30 minutes of flight time. The area is one that includes the San Andreas Fault, a major area of interest in earthquake study. The flights precisely retrace the lines flown on earlier missions, allowing researchers to compare the measurements of the same exact areas from one flight to the next. Where passenger seats would normally be aligned along the jet’s interior, NASA’s Gulfstream has mental racks of equipment, controlling, monitoring, and recording the navigation and sensor systems. The pilot and co-pilot are in control of the aircraft during takeoff and landing, while positioning the aircraft for the start of a line and while turning from the end of one line to the start of the next. Once in position, however, control switches to the PPA. A Dryden mission manager engages and disengages the system from a station behind the cockpit, where he also monitors it during the line to ensure the aircraft remains within the “tube.” He also monitors the airspeed, as the radar system must maintain airspeed of at least 350 knots in order to function properly. Another station in the rear of the jet is for monitoring the radar system. At the end of each line, the PPA is disengaged and the pilots take control once more. The disengagement is noticeable only from the movement of the aircraft, as it begins to turn; otherwise the transition is seamless. The co-pilot’s seat has a small computer tablet attached to the center of the control yoke, which is tied into the PPA. This allows him to guide the aircraft to the correct starting point before handing off control. In planning these flights, the scientists select which areas they want mapped and select the flight lines, providing the start and end coordinates for each. The flight crew then maps out the mission, adding the turns form one line to the next, calculating the amount of fuel required and arranging for any airspace clearances necessary for the flight paths. Dryden flies the California earthquake missions, studying the San Andreas and Hayward faults, every six months to monitor the changes, said Tim Moes, Dryden’s project manager for the Gulfstream III. This fall’s series of earthquake flights began in October and included some 43hours of flight time, wrapping up with a six-hour flight on December 6. This series was a little longer than the normal biannual missions, which tend to run about 30 hours, Moes said. However, project scientists booked additional flight time to study the continuing changes in the vicinity of the April earthquake in Baja California. Those extra observations have shown the earthquake activated other faults “in ways we’re just learning about,” Parker said. The California earthquake missions began in 2009, and scientists now have four sets of flight data for comparison, said Paul Lundgren, project scientist at JPL. The UAVSAR uses radar technology developed for scientists, which have advantages over aircraft for this kind of study, Lundgren said. Satellites offer regular overflights of the area and can cover a wider swath of territory with each pass. Additionally, satellites provide an image undisturbed by airflow, such as is created by flying the system on an airplane. These disturbances must be compensated for in processing the images, he said. Mounting the system aboard an aircraft, however, carries its own advantages, Lundgren said. It may be sent to cover any area at virtually any time and repeat the passes as desired, instead of the predetermined orbits of a satellite. Most satellites are in orbits that collect information along a north-south route; an aircraft can instead travel east to west and collect a different image. In addition, the United States does not have any satellites with the radar system; scientists here have had to rely on data gathered by foreign satellites. “UAVSAR represents our initial foray into this by NASA,” Lundgren said. The system has also been used to study volcanoes, measuring changes in magma domes and other factors at sites such as Mount St. Helens in Washington and Kilauea in Hawaii. The system was used in June (2010) to map the coastline of the Gulf of Mexico to provide baseline data for a study of the effects of the PB oil spill on the coastal area. The radar system has also been used in studies of the levy system used in the Sacramento Delta region, soil moisture and vegetation studies, all around the world. Although it is being used to collect scientific data, the UAVSAR system is still in the engineering phase. “We have a very good foundation for getting the data, but it’s complicated to produce pictures,” Parker said. “It’s well along in the sense that we’re getting very high-quality data, but the process is still undergoing changes. This story was originally reported in the Antelope Valley Press, 12-11-10. Argument Construction Worksheet Use the table below to construct your argument for site selection. Be sure to save your documentation in digital form so it can be used in your multimedia presentation. City/ Country Issue How the area would benefit from improved earthquake monitoring data. How the U.S. and NASA will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring in this area. How scientists, engineers, state and federal authorities, fire departments, police, and families would benefit. What resources for damage mitigation are available in the area. The impact of the location on flight planning and how you will maximize or minimize the impacts (covered in Section 2). Reason Evidence/Documentation Multimedia Proposal Flow Chart – Site Selection Use the flow chart below to organize the presentation for your argument for site selection. Use additional pages as needed. (Technology Tip: Construct your storyboard digitally using Microsoft Word® and Smart Art Flowchart Design.) Section 2: Elements of Flight Planning Day 5 The Mathematics of Flight Planning Activity 2.1 Totally Tubular Volume Significant mathematics is required to plan a flight for earthquake monitoring. This includes calculating distance, cost, and time of the flight itself; determining the best altitude for data collection, and even comparing the two images for differential interferometry. Problem Set Totally Tubular! View the demonstration, Totally Tubular! which demonstrates the importance of the automatic pilot in collecting data with the UAVSAR. When you have viewed the demonstration, complete the Totally Tubular Volume Problem Set. The G-III and the UAVSAR make repeated passes over an area in order to get exact images to compare. The pilot has an invisible “tube” of airspace that the G-III must line up to. Once lined up, the Flight Operations Specialist will activate the UAVSAR’s autopilot and monitoring system that will take over control of the plane. This set of problems will help you understand the importance of the volume of the virtual tube. What might happen if the tube is too narrow? Too wide? To answer these questions, you will use one of your favorite geometry formulas: v = h · · r² This system precisely guides the plane through the tube of airspace, so exact data can be recorded. When the pass is complete, the aircraft control is switched back to the pilot to make a turn. This process is repeated many times. In the picture to the right, Engineering Operations Specialist Haupt activates the UAVSAR autopilot on the G-III. View the 55-second video clip on Gulfstream-III that includes footage of a G-III checkout flight with the UAVSAR pod and radar imagery over the Mojave Desert. Totally Tubular Volume Problem Set Participate in the Totally Tubular Demonstration and then answer these questions. Be sure to show your work. Volume of a Cylinder = Height x x Radius2 v = h · · r² 1. Summarize what you learned in the Totally Tubular Demonstration. Which G-III flew straighter, the one with UAVSAR autopilot or the one without? 2. Using the formula for the Volume of a Cylinder to determine the volume of the Totally Tubular test cylinder. (You will need to take measurements.) 3. Using the formula for the Volume of a Cylinder to calculate the volume of the airspace for the G-III if h = 20 miles and r = 2 miles. 4. Using the formula for the Volume of a Cylinder, calculate the volume of the airspace for the G-III if the h = 50 miles and r = 10 miles. 5. Why would it be important to limit the radius of the cylinder of the UAVSAR remote pilot? Swath Geometry NASA’s G-III aircraft carries a RADAR system known as a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) that is used for measuring very small changes in the surface of the earth in order for scientists to understand and possibly predict earthquakes. The G-III and the UAVSAR fly predetermined paths with great precision. The UAVSAR only “looks” to the left of the aircraft, so the flight paths have to be flown in such a way that data are collected over the entire selected area. This is represented by the image below. Activity 2.1 Swath Geometry Problem Set The swath area is dependent upon the altitude of the G-III. Complete the Swath Geometry Problem Set and use the Pythagorean Theorem to calculate distance. You’ll need the following facts to help you complete this problem set: The aircraft flies at 40,000 feet (6.6 nautical miles) above the earth and the SAR’s line of sight to the ground below is perpendicular to the G-III’s flight path. The beam width of the SAR is approximately 10o and the center of the beam is angled downward 13o below the horizon. This creates a swath along the ground track that varies in size and position based on the aircraft’s altitude. The aircraft flies in a straight line for 150 nautical miles taking RADAR data, then descends to 20,000 feet (3.3 nm) and flies in a straight line for another 150 nautical miles taking RADAR data. NASA’s G-III aircraft takeoff performance allows it to climb 1 mile in altitude for every 4 miles it travels across the ground. For the Gulfstream III jet that UAVSAR flies on, its maximum flight time is about 6 hours from takeoff to landing. In your Daily Log, summarize what you’ve learned: DL 5: How do the G-III and UAVSAR do their jobs? Swath Geometry Problem Set Complete the following problem set involving the Pythagorean Theorem. Be sure to show your work and be prepared to defend your solution. 1. Solving for Length of Missing Side Using Pythagorean Theorem: NASA’s G-III aircraft takeoff performance allows it to climb 1 mile in altitude for every 4 miles it travels across the ground. If the aircraft levels off for cruise flight at 5 miles above the ground, what was the angular distance (hypotenuse) from the point of takeoff that the G-III flew to get to its cruise altitude? 2. Solving for Length of Missing Side Using Pythagorean Theorem: NASA’s G-III aircraft is flying a mission at 6 miles above the earth’s surface. As the aircraft approaches the end of its orbit, the pilot tunes the Distance Measurement Equipment (DME) of the aircraft’s navigation system to the nearest airport transmitter. The DME indicates a distance of 18 miles from the G-III aircraft. What is the actual distance of the aircraft from the airport below? 3. Solving for Length of Missing Side Using Pythagorean Theorem: NASA’s G-III aircraft carries a RADAR system known as a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) that is used for measuring very small changes in the surface of the earth in order for scientists to understand and possibly predict earthquakes. The distance from the G-III’s flight path to the point on the ground for data collection is 19 miles (b). The distance from the SAR unit on the G-III to the point where the center of SAR’s beam strikes the ground below is 20 miles (c). Find the height above ground that the G-III is flying. 4. Solving for Length of Missing Side Using Pythagorean Theorem: NASA’s G-III aircraft flies west from Midville to Swanson, a distance of 250 miles, then turns south and flies to Cornertown, a distance of another 80 miles, for a total distance of 330 miles. What would the distance be if the G-III had flown directly from Midville to Cornertown? 5. Solving for Angular Distance of Right Triangles Using the Pythagorean Theorem: NASA’s G-III aircraft carries a RADAR system known as a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) that is used for measuring very small changes in the surface of the earth in order for scientists to understand and possibly predict earthquakes. The aircraft flies at 40,000 feet (6.6 nautical miles) above the earth and the SAR’s line of sight to the ground below is perpendicular to the G-III’s flight path. The beamwidth of the SAR is approximately 10 o and the center of the beam is angled downward 13o below the horizon. This creates a swath along the ground track that varies in size and position based on the aircraft’s altitude. Given that the slant range to the farthest edge of the swath at 40,000 feet is 47 miles from the SAR, and the slant range to the closest edge of the swath is 21 miles from the aircraft, what is the width of the swath on the ground (b1 – b2)? Round off distances to whole numbers. 6. Solving for Angular Distance/Right Triangle with One Side and One Angle: NASA’s G-III aircraft carries a RADAR system known as a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) that is used for measuring very small changes in the surface of the earth in order for scientists to understand and possibly predict earthquakes. The aircraft typically flies at 40,000 feet (6.6 nautical miles high) above the earth and the SAR’s line-of-sight to the ground below is perpendicular to the G-III’s flight path. The center of the SAR’s beam has a depression angle of 13o below the horizon, creating a Radar swath along the ground track that varies in size and position based on the aircraft’s altitude. If the G-III descends to 30,000 feet (4.9 nautical miles high), how much closer to the aircraft will the center of the swath be (c 1 – c2)? 7. Solving Area Changes using Right Triangles & Trigonometric Ratios: NASA’s G-III aircraft carries a RADAR system and flies at 40,000 feet (6.6 nautical miles) above the earth and the SAR’s line of sight to the ground below is perpendicular to the G-III’s flight path. The beamwidth of the RADAR is approximately 10o wide and the center of the beam is angled downward 13o below the horizon (depression angle). This creates a swath along the ground track that varies in size and position based on the aircraft’s altitude. The aircraft flies in a straight line for 150 nautical miles taking RADAR data, then descends to 20,000 feet (3.3 nm) and flies in a straight line for another 150 nautical miles taking RADAR data. Determine the area of both data swaths at the different altitudes (round off values to one decimal point). Day 6 Differential Interferometry Differential interferometry (D-InSAR) requires taking at least two images with. The DEM can be either produced by GPS measurements or could be generated by interferometry as long as the time between acquisition of the image pairs is short, which guarantees minimal distortion of the image of the target surface. In principle, three images of the ground area with similar image acquisition geometry are often adequate for D-InSar. The principle for detecting ground movement is quite simple. One interferogram is created from the first two images; this is also called the reference interferogram or topographical interferogram. A second interferogram is created that captures topography plus distortion. Subtracting the latter from the reference interferogram can reveal differential fringes, indicating movement. The described 3 image D-InSAR generation technique is called 3-pass or doubledifference method. Differential fringes which remain as fringes in the differential interferogram are a result of SAR range changes of any displaced point on the ground from one interferogram to the next. In the differential interferogram, each fringe is directly proportional to the SAR wavelength, which is about 5.6 cm for ERS and RADARSAT single phase cycle. Surface displacement away from the satellite look direction causes an increase in path (translating to phase) difference. Since the signal travels from the SAR antenna to target and back again, the measured displacement is twice the unit of wavelength. This means in differential interferometry one fringe cycle -pi to +pi or one wavelength corresponds to a displacement relative to SAR antenna of only half wavelength (2.8 cm). Activity 2.2: Interpreting Interferograms (PLACEHOLDER: UNDER DEVELOPMENT) When you have completed the activity, be sure to respond to the Daily Log: DL 6: How will UAVSAR interferogram data help us mitigate earthquake damage? Interpreting Interferograms (PLACEHOLDER: UNDER DEVELOPMENT) Day 7 Basics of Flight Planning It would be very difficult to build a house without a plan.1 A builder depends on the plan to provide information about the design and size of a house under construction. Plans can also be used to describe an action or sequence of events such as planning for a celebration. The pilot of an airplane depends on a flight plan to provide information to help ensure a successful flight to a destination. The plan may contain the following information: Aircraft number (identification) When the flight will leave (departure time) Where the plane will takeoff from (departure point) How it will get there (route of flight) Where it will land (destination) How long it will take to fly there (estimated time en route) When the flight will land (estimated time of arrival) Abbreviations and codes are used on flight plans to save space and reduce the number of words. For example, the code for San Francisco International Airport in California would appear on the flight plan as SFO. Palmdale International Airport, the departure point for the G-III, is abbreviated PIA. GULFSTREAM-III BY THE NUMBERS 69,700 lbs Maximum Takeoff Weight (with fuel/ passengers/cargo) 38,000 lbs Empty Weight 77 ft Wingspan 83 ft Length of Airplane 24 ft Height of Airplane 495 mph (430 knots) Average Cruising Speed 581 mph (505 knots Mach 0.85) Maximum Speed 45,000 ft 4,000 nautical miles 2 11,400 lbs (5,170 kg) Maximum Operating Altitude Range (when fully loaded) Number of Engines (Rolls-Royce Spey Mark 511-8 turbofan) Thrust produced per Engine The pilot plans the route of flight by connecting a series of points on an aeronautical chart (see example on the left). 1 This section is excerpted from Plan to Fly There, Aeronautics Educator Guide (NASA). Prominent landmarks such as radio towers, race tracks, and mountains are depicted on aeronautical charts to help pilots navigate. Pilots also use landmarks to specify their location when communicating on the radio to flight controllers and air traffic. Be sure to consider the use of landmarks in your flight plan to assist your navigator. Are pilots required to use a flight plan? For most pilots, the answer is yes.. For example, pilots flying commercial airliners are required to use flight plans.Other pilots use flight plans for safety reasons. If a flight is not completed on time, government agencies are notified so search and rescue operations may locate the pilot and airplane filed on the flight plan. To learn more about future flight design and air traffic control, go to http://futureflight.arc.nasa.gov/. In this Pilots use a radio or telephone to communicate or "file" flight plan information with a Flight Service Station. Once the airplane is airborne, Air Traffic Control (ATC) controllers use the information on flight plans to help track airplanes, and to maintain a safe distance between airplanes. designed for air transportation. With more Different airplanes travel at different speeds. Pilots determine the time en route based upon the cruising speed of their airplane. In order to be as economical as possible, the G-III flies at an average cruising speed of 490 mph (430 knots) Activity 2.3: Flight Planning – Part 1 Use the Flight Plan Draft and a map of California, the United States, or the world to record your departure airport, destination airport, route of flight, and estimated flying time in hours. Complete the calculations on your Flight Plan Draft to help your team decide on an appropriate the departure time and subsequent arrival time at the destination airport. If you have to stop to refuel, consider where would be the best site to land. Be sure to include your reasoning in your flight plan proposal. If time and resources permit, plot your takeoff airport, return airport, and three data takes on a printed map. When you feel that your Flight Plan Draft is complete, you’ll be ready to go to NASA’s online flight planning tool and incorporate the UAVSAR data takes into your plan. Be sure to respond to the Daily Log: DL 7: What does your flight plan include? program, you become a NASA researcher and design the air transportation system of the future! When cars were invented, scientists and engineers had to design a ground transportation system with roads and traffic rules. A similar system was people traveling by air than ever before, your challenge is to find ways to improve this air transportation system. Flight Plan Draft Basic Flight Plan Information Aircraft Identification NASA Gulfstream-III Departure Airport Palmdale International Airport (PIA) Departure Time(Military Time) Intermediate Airport Description of Route of Flight Destination Airport Total Distance from Departure to Destination Airports (include Intermediate Airports if appropriate) Nautical Miles Average Speed of G-III 430 Nautical Miles/hour Estimated Time En Route Hours Arrival Time (Military Time) Cost/hour Dollars Estimated Total Cost Dollars UAVSAR Data Take Paths Information Recommended Altitude of Flight Area to be Mapped Nautical Miles2 Width of Swath Nautical Miles Number of Swaths (Data Take Paths) Diagram of Area with Rough Swath Plan Day 8 Activity 2.4: Flight Planning – Part 2 The UAVSAR Flight Planning map is a Google Maps flight planning tool developed specifically for NASA. You will log into the site as a guest and use the tool to plan your flight and estimate the time and distance required. The main features of the flight planning tool include drawing flight lines on the map, nudging them, adding them to the current flight plan, and reordering them. You can also add ground control points and search and select takeoff, landing, and intermediate airports. As the flight plan is constructed, all of its components are constantly being saved and updated. The tool may be accessed from any computer with Safari, Foxfire, or Chrome. It will not work properly in Internet Explorer. Access the tool at http://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/fps Once in the system, click on Video Tutorial (top right) and view the following tutorials. You will also be able to refer back to these tutorials at any time during the flight planning process. Getting Started Airport & Flight Lines: drag & drop Flight Line: add line using end point method Takeoff Airport: select airport Landing Airport: select airport Flight Plan Report (Generate Plan and View Previous Plans) Flight Plan Requirements You should create a flight plan that includes the following: Takeoff Airport Landing Airport Minimum of 3 data take lines Generating Your Flight Plan Report When you have completed your plan, you will generate a report. This report will include three important components of your plan: 1. Summary – this contains all the flight time estimates as well as the estimated cost of the flight plan at the bottom. 2. Flight Plan Maps (terrain and hybrid views) - this displays the full flight plan and each individual swath. It also includes a legend and a list of the data take paths. The map above is in the “hybrid” view and shows two data take paths 3. Configuration File – this file contains more detailed information about the flight plan. Summary In addition to these three documents, you will also need to update your Flight Plan Draft Worksheet. Be sure to respond to the Daily Log: DL 8: How did the online flight planning tool help you create a flight plan that is accurate and comprehensive? Days 9-10 Activity 2.5: Creating the Multimedia The last information you need for your multimedia proposal is to develop your argument for your flight plan. Complete the Defending Your Flight Plan and Presentation Flow Chart: Flight Plan Proposal Map (Hybrid View) To develop your multimedia proposal, you will use all of your resources—Flight Plan Draft, Flight Plan Summary, Flight Plan Maps, Configuration File, Flight Plan Defense—as well as your Argument Construction Worksheet and Argument Flow Chart. Be sure also to use the checklist and rubric to guide your effort. There are many options for multimedia, including the following. Check with your teacher to see which options are available or if you may use one not listed: PowerPoint, KeyNote, Prezy, Camtasia, Audacity, Producer, Movie Maker, Garage Band, Wikis, Glogster, VoiceThread, or Animoto. Configuration File Be sure to respond to the Daily Log: DL 9: How is your multimedia proposal progressing? Creating the Argument for Your Proposal Defending Your Flight Plan Defend your Destination Airport: Why was your choice the best destination airport possible? Defend your Intermediate Airport: Why was your choice the best intermediate airport possible? Defend your Departure Time: Why did you decide to start your flight at that time of day? Defend your Total Cost: What is your flight plan the most cost effective? Defend your Data Take Paths: Why did you choose these data take paths? What other information do you want to provide in your multimedia proposal? Multimedia Proposal Flow Chart – Flight Plan Information Use the flow chart below to organize your presentation on the flight plan you are proposing. Use additional pages as needed. (Technology Tip: Construct your storyboard digitally using Microsoft Word® and Smart Art Flowchart Design.) Pre-Conference Form Use the Proposal Checklist and Scoring Guide to identify strengths and areas of improvement for your multimedia proposal. Complete one form per team and be ready to share your ideas with your teacher. Strengths (2 per category) Quality and Strength of Argument for Site Selection Quality, Accuracy, and Cost Efficiency of Flight Plan Quality of Multimedia Proposal Teacher Feedback Areas for Improvement (2 per category) THE FLIGHT MISSION CHALLENGE The Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring is the culmination of the knowledge and achievements students have gained in the preceding activities. The design challenge is the opportunity to “put it together” in creating a proposal to advance our knowledge of how earthquakes impact the surface of the earth. This section of the guide provides further details on the FMC: IEM rules and requirements, multimedia formats and resources, and evaluation rubrics. Challenge Objective Student teams will propose a site location and flight plan for earthquake monitoring. Challenge Description Working in three phases, small teams of students will identify a site location that is in need of earthquake monitoring and baseline data collection; design a flight plan to/from Edwards Air Force Base; and create a multimedia presentation to present their proposal to NASA. Extensions Assessment Process Two summative assessment tools are provided to assist in the evaluation of individual and team performance in Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring challenge. An analytic rubric provides detailed criteria in four categories: Competitive, Strong, Limited, and Poor. A multiple choice questions test bank includes 50 questions in science, mathematics, and engineering that be used in a unit examination. Enter the team with the best results in NASA’s 2011 Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring. This is a national contest to identify new sites for improved earthquake monitoring. The winning team will be brought to the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center for VIP tours and other experiences. Information about the contest can be found at the following site: http://arees.nasa.gov/. If future contests will be held, information will be found on the same site. Hold FMC: IEM team briefings for other classes. If your school hosts a science fair, have teams present their proposals for fair visitors. Hold a school or district-wide competition for the Quaky-Shaky Engineering Design Challenge. Proposal Checklist and Scoring Guide CATEGORY Characteristics of a Successful Proposal (Each characteristic is worth 5 points) Points Possible 1. Selected site is within parameters of Challenge. Quality and Strength of Argument for Site Selection 2. Proposal includes comprehensive and accurate information of location and description of site. 3. Proposal includes accurate information about how area will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring data. 4. Proposal identifies accurate information about how U.S. and NASA will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring in this area. 5. Proposal identifies accurate information about how scientists, engineers, state and federal authorities, fire departments, police, and families would benefit. 6. Proposal identifies what resources for damage mitigation are available in the area. 7. Proposal includes summary of impact of the location on flight planning and how these impacts will be maximized or minimized. 45 8. Charts, graphics, and maps of important data are provided. 9. References are current, relevant, and reputable. 10. Flight plan meets parameters of the Challenge. Quality, Accuracy, and Cost Efficiency of Flight Plan 11. Proposal includes description of flight plan, including explanation of how resources (time, budget, human) will be used efficiently. 12. Proposal includes details on take-off, intermediate, and landing airports and data take paths. 13. Proposal includes images of terrain and hybrid views of flight plan. 30 14. Configuration data is analyzed and explained. 15. Proposal includes discussion of why choices were made and reflection on flight plan design process. 16. All major elements of proposal are addressed. Quality of Multimedia Proposal TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE 17. Content is well organized with subheadings or bulleted lists. Use of font, color, graphics, and effects enhance presentation. 18. Use of multimedia contributes to the persuasiveness of the argument. 19. Contributions of each author are identified. Each author makes important contributions to the oral presentation. 20. Proposal is professional, interesting, and well-rehearsed, with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. 25 100 Points Earned Rubric for Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Competitive Strong Quality and Strength of Argument for Site Selection Limited Poor Rubric for Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Competitive Information of location and description of site is comprehensive and accurate. Argument for site selection is logical and well supported. Information about how area will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring data are accurate, comprehensive, and persuasive. Information about how U.S. and NASA will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring in this area is persuasive. Multiple ways that scientists, engineers, state and federal authorities, fire departments, police, and families would benefit is creative and compelling. Multiple resources for damage mitigation are available in the area are identified. Summary of impact of location on flight planning is comprehensive. Four or more charts, graphics, and maps of important data provide support for argument. References are current, relevant, and reputable. Strong Information of location and description of site is accurate. Argument for site selection is logical and supported with some evidence. Information about how area will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring data are accurate and supports the argument. Information about how U.S. and NASA will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring in this area is included. Several ways that scientists, engineers, state and federal authorities, fire departments, police, and families would benefit are itemized. Includes identification of at least one resource for damage mitigation are available in the area are identified. Impact of location on flight planning is summarized. Three Charts, graphics, and maps of important data support argument. References are relevant and reputable. Limited Poor Information of location and description of site is accurate but key points are missing, or information is present but inaccurate. Argument for site selection is logical but critical evidence is missing in one or more of the following areas: how area will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring data are appropriate; how U.S. and NASA will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring in this area is included; ways that scientists, engineers, state and federal authorities, fire departments, police, and families would benefit are itemized; and/or identification of at least one resource for damage mitigation are available in the area. Impact of location on flight planning is incomplete. Only two charts, graphics, and maps of important data are included. References are relevant. Information of location and description of site is inaccurate and key points are missing. Argument for site selection is poorly developed and critical evidence is missing in several of the following areas: how area will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring data are appropriate; how U.S. and NASA will benefit from improved earthquake monitoring in this area is included; ways that scientists, engineers, state and federal authorities, fire departments, police, and families would benefit are itemized; and/or identification of at least one resource for damage mitigation are available in the area. Impact of location on flight planning is missing or incomplete. Charts, graphics, and maps of important data are not included or are dated and not related to the argument. References are incomplete. Rubric for Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Competitive Strong Limited Poor Quality, Accuracy, and Cost Efficiency of Flight Plan Flight plan is detailed and strategic. Thoroughly describes flight plan, including explanation of how resources (time, budget, human) will be used efficiently. Documents important details on take-off, intermediate and landing airports and data take paths. Includes images of terrain and hybrid views of flight plan. Configuration data are accurately analyzed. Thorough and persuasive discussion of why choices were made and thorough reflection on planning process. Flight plan is reasonable. Description of flight plan includes explanation of how resources (time, budget, human) will be used efficiently. Details on take-off, intermediate and landing airports and data take paths are accurate. Includes images of terrain and hybrid views of flight plan. Configuration data are analyzed with few mistakes. Solid explanation of why choices were made and sufficient reflection on planning process. Flight plan is reasonable, but there are gaps in explanation of how resources (time, budget, human) will be used efficiently. Calculations of cost or distance are inaccurate. Information on take-off, intermediate and landing airports and data take paths is incomplete. Includes images of terrain and hybrid views of flight plan. Analysis of configuration data are limited. Incomplete explanation of how choices were made. Limited evidence of reflection on planning process. Flight plan is not reasonable. There is little explanation of how time, budget, and human resources will be use efficiently. Calculations of cost and distance are inaccurate. Missing Information on take-off, intermediate and landing airports and/or data take paths. Missing images of terrain and hybrid views of flight plan. Little or no analysis of configuration data. Explanation of how choices were made is missing or incomplete. All major elements of proposal are addressed. Content is organized to direct viewer. Use of font, color, graphics, and effects supports presentation. Use of multimedia contributes to the persuasiveness of the argument. Contributions of each author are identified, but there are obvious differences in the degree of contributions of team members. Presentation is interesting, convincing, and holds audience attention. Some elements of the proposal are poorly developed. Some content is disorganized. Use of font, color, graphics, or effects detracts viewer. Use of multimedia is limited; but what is used contributes to the persuasiveness of the argument. Contributions of each author are not well identified or only a few team members completed the bulk of the work. Presentation captures attention but confused the audience. Some points are relevant, but overall argument fails to Multiple elements of the proposal are missing or incomplete. Content is disorganized and argument is difficult to follow. Font, color, graphics, and effects detract from presentation. Little multimedia is included. Contributions of authors are not well identified and work is shoddy and unprofessional. Argument fails to convince. Quality of Multimedia Presentation All elements of proposal are fully addressed. Content is well organized with subheadings or bulleted lists. Use of font, color, graphics, and effects enhance presentation. Use of multimedia contributes to persuasiveness of the argument. Contributions of each team member are identified. Each team member makes important contributions to the oral presentation. Presentation is convincing, professional, interesting, wellrehearsed, and designed to Rubric for Flight Mission Challenge: Improving Earthquake Monitoring Competitive captivate audiences. Strong Limited convince. Poor Key Vocabulary Aeronautical chart – map used to assist in navigation of aircraft. Air traffic controller – individual trained to manage air traffic. Autopilot – a navigational devise that automatically keeps planes on a steady course. Baseline data – data collected to establish and understanding the existing conditions. Building code – set of standards established and enforced by local government for the structural safety of buildings. Creepmeter – instrument used to determine if slow movement is taking place between two parts of an earthquake fault line, Deformation – a change for the worse; altering the form with a negative result. Differential interferogram – results from the comparison of at least two images and which demonstrates the changes that have occurred. Earthquake - shaking and vibration at the surface of the earth resulting from underground movement along a fault plane of from volcanic activity Engineer – person who is trained in the application of scientific and mathematical principles to the design, manufacture, and operation of machines and processes. Engineering design process – steps used by engineers to help develop products. Fault – a crack in the earth’s crust. Forecast – to predict in advance. GPS (Global Positioning System) - radio navigation system that allows users to determine their exact location. Knot - A unit of speed, used to measure wind speed. One knot is equal to 1.151 miles per hour or 1.852 kilometers per hour and is most commonly abbreviated as kn. Magnitude – property of size or extent (whether large or small). Mission – assignment for an operation, study, or process. Mitigate – to reduce the seriousness or extent of the circumstances. Model – representation of a phenomenon. Monitor - to watch and check a situation carefully for a period of time in order to discover something. Natural hazards –naturally occurring event that has potential of negative effect on people or the environment. Navigate – to plan, record, and control the course of an aircraft. Plate tectonics – theory that explains the global distribution of geological phenomena. Probability – measure of how likely it is that some event will occur. QuakeSim – a NASA project for modeling earthquake fault systems. Radar – instrument that uses electromagnetic waves to identify range, altitude, direction or speed of moving and fixed objects. Seismometer - instruments that measure motions of the ground, including those of seismic waves generated by earthquakes. Space-based technologies – using space observation of the Earth (via satellites and aircraft) to improve understanding of earthquake and volcanic processes. Stress – force exerted when one body presses on, pulls on, pushes against, or tends to compress or twist. Stressmeter – instrument that measures the stress on an object. Surface distortion – changes in the surface of the earth due to stress. Swath - portion of Earth's surface or atmosphere measured by an instrument during a single satellite overpass. Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) - instrument that uses radar to measure the surface distortions caused by earthquakes, volcanoes, and other dynamic phenomena References Charles Scawthorn, "Designing for and mitigating earthquakes", in AccessScience@McGraw-Hill, http://www.accessscience.com, DOI 10.1036/1097-8542.YB070130 NASA Research: Earthquakes http://solidearth.jpl.nasa.gov/PAGES/quake04.html Earthquake Hazard Program. NSGS. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/ G-III/UAVSAR TEACHER, STUDENTS, AND MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES Type of Resource Content Area T = Teacher S = Science Annotation S = Student T = Technology Type of Resource T How Does Imaging Radar Work? Simple and visual explanation of how imaging radar works. Clicking “back” takes you to a first question “What Do Topo Maps Have to Do With Space?” Also in Spanish. Part of JPL NASA SpacePlace. Track UAVSAR Flight Allows you to track UAVSAR flight on the G-III within US airspace in real time by clicking on the 'go' button. Clicking will open a new window (the flight-tracking website is not a JPL website). If the G3 is not in flight, the website will indicate the last known position. UAVSAR Missions to Hawaii, Haiti, and Central America (Airborne Science Newsletter, Spring 2010) NASA’s G-III UAVSAR has had a very productive start to 2010 with deployments to Hawaii, Haiti, and Central America while conducting local missions from its base in Palmdale California, as well. Gulfstream-III Movie Collection Three movies from the NASA Movie Collection. Gulfstream-III Photo Journal Images from the JPL Photo Journal. G-III Photo Gallery Pictures of the G-III, UAVSAR, and data imagery. Arctic Trek to 'Break the Ice' on New NASA Airborne Radars Press release (2009). NASA will 'break the ice' on new airborne radars that can help monitor climate change when a team of scientists embarks this week on a two-month expedition to the vast, frigid terrain of Greenland and Iceland. Mount Saint Helens in False Color from UAVSAR Lithograph of Mount Saint Helens of UAVSAR imaging. On the Road to DESDynl with UAVSAR Poster (2009) presented by team of Caltech/JPL reporting on NASA Terrestrial Ecology project involving G-III and UAVSAR to estimate canopy height and biomass. NASA's G-III and UAVSAR Conducting East Coast Vegetation Study Press release of radar imaging mission. UAVSAR Overview Homepage for UAVSAR (Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar) that includes news, mission and flights, instrument details, data, science, publications, and contacts. UAVSAR: A New NASA Airborne SAR System for Science and Technology Research. Scientific research report includes explanation process of differential interferometry. The Great Southern California Shake-Out At 10:00 am, Thursday November 13, southern California participated in the largest earthquake preparedness drill in U.S. history. The movie depicts the response of NASA/JPL researchers to this event. Included in this scenario are components which include modeling MM = Multimedia E = Engineering M = Math Science S MM K-5 6-8 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X T 9-12 E Math K-5 X 6-8 X 9-12 G-III/UAVSAR TEACHER, STUDENTS, AND MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES Type of Resource Content Area T = Teacher S = Science Annotation S = Student T = Technology Type of Resource T S MM MM = Multimedia E = Engineering M = Math Science K-5 6-8 9-12 LS ES PS ES PS ES T E Math K-5 6-8 using QuakeSim tools and immediate post-earthquake acquisition of InSAR and SAR data by UAVSAR. NASA Airborne Radar To Study Quake Faults In Haiti, Dominican Republic Press release (2002). In response to the disaster in Haiti on Jan. 12, NASA has added a series of science over flights of earthquake faults in Haiti and the Dominican Republic on the island of Hispaniola to a previously scheduled three-week airborne radar campaign to Central. NASA Radar Images Show How Mexico Quake Deformed Earth Press Release (2010). NASA has released the first-ever airborne radar images of the deformation in Earth's surface caused by a major earthquake -- the magnitude 7.2 temblor that rocked Mexico's state of Baja California and parts of the American Southwest on April 4. Scientists Search for a Pulse in Skies Above Earthquake Country Press release (2009). New NASA 3-D airborne radar will study California's earthquake faults. Radar sees below the surface to measure buildup and release of strain along faults. Data can be used to guide rescue and damage assessment efforts after a quake. Earthquake Studies: SAR Interferometry and Surface Change Detection SAR can provide high-resolution imagery of earthquake-prone areas, high-resolution topographic data, and a high-resolution map of coseismic deformation generated by an earthquake. Of these, the last one is probably the most useful, primarily because it is unique. Other techniques are capable of generating images of the Earth's surface and topographic data, but no other technique provides high-spatial-resolution maps of earthquake deformation. X X X X SAR Interferometry and Surface Change Detection (JPL Research Report, 1995). Scientific argument for the need for global SAR measurements of surface changes due to earthquakes. Case of the Shaky Quake Educator Guide with activities in mathematics, science, and technology. Students work as Tree House Detective to learn about earthquakes. Resources include videos, website, and career education links. From NASA SCI Files. X X X X 9-12 G-III/UAVSAR TEACHER, STUDENTS, AND MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES Type of Resource Content Area T = Teacher S = Science Annotation S = Student T = Technology Type of Resource Southern California Integrated GPS Network Education Module (Earthquakes) This educational module was designed to allow students to interactively explore the use of SCIGN and its data in earthquake studies. It is divided into four major sections: Plate Tectonics, Earthquakes, GPS, and Space Technology at Work. All of the sections include background material and activities; the first three sections focus primarily on introducing satellite technology and tectonic phenomena, and the final section serves to integrate knowledge learned in the first three by allowing students to use real SCIGN data in their investigations into plate tectonics, earthquakes, and GPS. Planetary Geology Educator Guide with exercises grouped into five units: 1) introduction to geologic processes, 2) impact cratering activities, 3) planetary atmosphere, 4) planetary surfaces and 5) geologic mapping. Earthquake (World Book at NASA) Overview of earthquakes; how an earthquake begins, spreads, and causes damage; how to reduce earthquake damage; and how to monitor and predict earthquakes. Earthquake Forecast Program Press release (2004). A NASA funded earthquake prediction program has an amazing track record. Published in 2002, the Rundle-Tiampo Forecast has accurately predicted the locations of 15 of California's 16 largest earthquakes this decade, including last week's tremors. FORECAST Scorecards The "Scorecard" is a forecast map, or "seismic hotspot" map, for a specific period of time. The hotspots are found by a method that computes the increase in potential for large (magnitude M > 5.0) earthquakes. Part of the NASA QuakeSim Website. Space Age Quake Research On April 18, 1906 a massive, deadly earthquake left the city of San Francisco in shambles. One hundred years later, earthquake research has changed dramatically. We can't actually travel back in time to study the 1906 earthquake directly, but scientists are doing the next best thing re-creating the earthquake inside a computer. NASA’s Earthquake Research Articles on current NASA projects related to earthquake monitoring and prediction. Anticipating Earthquakes (audio file/streaming audio) Science@NASA report on how satellite technologies being developed at NASA and elsewhere might be able to spot the signs of an impending quake days or weeks before it strikes, giving the public and emergency planners time to prepare. Discussion of how radar and InSAR is used. T S MM X X X X X X X X X X X X MM = Multimedia E = Engineering M = Math Science K-5 6-8 T E 9-12 ES ES ES X ES Math K-5 X X X 6-8 9-12 X G-III/UAVSAR TEACHER, STUDENTS, AND MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES Type of Resource Content Area T = Teacher S = Science Annotation S = Student T = Technology Type of Resource T NASA Details Earthquake Effects on the Earth press release (2005). NASA scientists using data from the Indonesian earthquake calculated it affected Earth's rotation, decreased the length of day, slightly changed the planet's shape, and shifted the North Pole by centimeters. The earthquake that created the huge tsunami also changed the Earth's rotation. U.S. Tree Canopy Height 1650-1992 Biophysical parameters are easy to measure for modern vegetation, but how do scientists know what those characteristics were in the past? Native old-growth vegetation has different characteristics than modern regrowth, particularly in a forest. NASA and USGS scientists Louis Steyaert and Robert Knox combed through both historical and modern records of vegetation to characterize biophysical parameters for 1650, 1850, 1920, and 1992. From NASA Earth Observatory. SAR, InSAR, and Lidar Studies for Measuring Vegetation Structure Over the Harvard Forest Poster presented by JPL Scientists. NASA’s Research: Volcanoes Articles on current NASA projects related to volcano monitoring and prediction. S MM X X X MM = Multimedia E = Engineering M = Math Science K-5 6-8 9-12 T E Math K-5 6-8 9-12 Shaky Table Construction Directions2 These instructions describe how to build an inexpensive shake table to simulate ground motion during an earthquake. The table is ideal for having students design Popsicle stick buildings to minimize damage during an earthquake. The table is also an excellent mechanism to study the resonance frequencies of buildings using the BOSS (Building Oscillation Seismic Simulation) Model published by AGU/Fema in their Seismic Sleuths publication. PART I: Base of Earthquake Table Materials Needed: Qty 1 2 2 2 2 4 8 8 8 Size 20” x 40” 40” length 46” length 20” length 21.5” length ½” length 4” length ¼” 3” length 4 Several Several 4” length 1-5/8” length ¾” length Material ½” Plywood 2x4 2x4 3/4” diameter PVC pipe 7/8” wooden dowel 7/8” diameter PVC pipe ¼” carriage bolts, full thread Retaining nuts (for carriage bolts) ¼” I.D. rubber sleeves (tygon or automotive vacuum tubing, or similar) Ceiling hooks (with threads) Drywall screws Drywall screws Note: All ceiling hooks and carriage bolts are centered on the 2 x 4 lengths. Step 1: Attach 2 x 4s to 20” x 40” plywood piece using drywall screws (Fig. 1). Carriage bolts are attached to the inside 46” length 2 x 4 at distances of 10.5”, 13.5”, 22.5” and 25.5” from the end that extends beyond the plywood base and should be countersunk to allow the 2 x 4s to lie flat on a countertop. Use ¼” nuts to secure carriage bolts. (Fig 2). Place rubber sleeves over carriage bolts to prevent wear on wooden dowels. 2 Original Design by Casey Hagbo, Geophysics Major, Class of 2001. Modified by NASA AREE Team, 2010. Fig. 1: Underside of base Fig. 2: Installing Carriage bolts & PVC tracks Step 2: Prepare to attach PVC pipe by first drilling three holes in the PVC. Two should be located 2” from each end and one at the midpoint of the pipe. These holes should only be drilled through one side of the PVC pipe. They will allow you to secure the pipe to the base later by serving as “windows” for the screws. These holes help the platform to glide more smoothly than if screws were sticking up a little on the top of the PVC pipe. Again center the pipes on the outer 2 x 4 and inset 2” from each of plywood sheet (Fig. 2). Step 3: Ceiling hooks are attached to the inner 2 x 4 at distances of 3” and 33” measured from the end that extends beyond the plywood base (Fig. 3). Fig 3: Base Section Ceiling Hooks installed Step 4: After assembling the base of the table, split each of the four 7/8” PVC pipe sections lengthwise and place one on each end of the wooden dowels (note: stretch open each section of PVC carefully to fit over the ends of the dowels). These dowels should be placed inside the bolt “fences”. Do not secure these dowels! They will be the part that the shake table platform will move back and forth on (Fig. 4). Fig 4: Dowel placement on base and PVC section installation PART II: The Shake Platform Materials Needed: Qty. Size 1 20” x 20” 2 20” length 4 4” length Several Several 1 20” x 20” Several 10 x ¾” 2 30” length 6 10 x ¾” Material ½” Plywood 2x4 Ceiling hooks (with threads) Drywall screws Large Rubber Bands Plexiglas (optional) Wood screws (optional) Velcro strap Pan head self-tapping wood screws Step 1: Attach the two 2 x 4s to the edges of the plywood with drywall screws and place the ceiling hooks 5” in from the edge of the plywood and centered on the 2 x 4s (Fig. 5). Apply paint and/or logos as builder’s discretion. The optional Plexiglas cover for the platform may be used to etch in scaling values or as protection for painted logos, as desired. Attach Plexiglas with 4 or more 10 x ¾” wood screws. Note: Use caution when drilling holes in Plexiglas due to shattering. Fig 5: Platform assembly with ceiling hooks installed Step 2: After assembly is complete, the table should be secured on top of the base by hooking 2 to 3 large rubber bands around each pair of hooks. The table platform should be able to roll back and forth over the wooden dowels (Fig. 6). Fig 6: Platform installed on base and secured with large rubber bands Step 3: Cut one ½” length off of each Velcro strap and set aside. Attach one end of a 29” Velcro strap to the edge of the platform lateral axis using one 10 x ¾” pan head screw. Using a small piece of Velcro, attach to the opposite edge of the platform using two self-tapping pan head wood screws. Repeat Velcro attachment process for longitudinal axis. Fig 7: Velcro attachment PART III: The Drill Mechanism Materials Needed: Qty. Size 1 6” length Box 7” x 11” x 2 ¾” Several ¾” length 4 2 ½” x 5/8” 4 1 ½” x 5/8” 2 1 ¼” 1 12” x 2” 1 Material 2x4 with 5/16” hole ½” Plywood Drywall screws Corner brackets Corner brackets Carriage bolts with wing nuts Brass or steel strap for securing drill ½” Variable speed electric drill Constructing the Box Assembly Step 1: Cut a 7” x 11” piece of ½” plywood and attach to the corner of the base (opposite of the platform assembly) using drywall screws. Step 2: Construct the walls of the box and attach to box base using corner brackets (Fig. 8). Note an additional 1 ¾” x 7” x ½” strip of wood is used to reinforce each short side of the box. Fig 8: Box Assembly with end walls attached Step 3: Attach a 1 ¾” x 11” x ½” strip of wood along the inside edge of the box to enclose three sides of the box. Attach a 7” x 11” x ½” plywood sheet to the top of the box using drywall screws to complete the box assembly (Fig 9). Fig 9: Completed box assembly Step 4: Attach the 6” length of 2 x 4 with the 5/16” hole (1.5” from top of 2 x 4) using drywall screws and corner brackets (Fig. 10). Attach the electric drill using the carriage bolts with wing nuts and the metal strap as shown in Figure 11. Note: Use Styrofoam or similar material between the drill and box assembly to adjust alignment of crank mechanism. Fig 10: Crank support and drill tie-down strap attached to box assembly Fig 11: Drill mounted with strap Part IV: Crank Mechanism Materials Needed: Qty Size Material 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 Several Several 3 ½” length 2” length 3/8” 3/8” 5/8” 3/8” 1” w x 1/8” thick x 2 ½” length 1” w x 1/8” thick x 15” length 5/8” 3/8” 5/8” Hex bolt 3/8” Hex bolt Hex nut Locking hex nuts Bushing Bushing Steel bar (Crank Mechanism) Steel bar (Armature Mechanism) washers washers Step 1: Assemble the crank mechanism using Figures 12 - 14 as a guide. Drill one 5/8” hole on one end of the 2 ½” steel bar approximately ¼” to ½” from the end and tap and thread for securing to the main drive (3 ½” length) 5/8” hex bolt. Drill a 3/8” second hole approximately 1” from the main drive hole and tap and thread for securing the 3/8” armature bolt. See figure 12 for general arrangement of crank and armature assemblies. Fig 12: Crank and armature mechanisms Step 2: Drill one 3/8” hole on one end of the 15” steel bar approximately ¼” to ½” from the end. Drill a 3/8” second hole approximately ¼” to ½” from the opposite end of the 15” steel bar. Using a vise and large crescent wrench, twist the mid-point of the 15” steel bar to create a 90o twist in the armature. Figure 13 depicts the twist in the armature desired for attaching the crank assembly to the table’s platform assembly. Fig 13: Assembled unit showing 90 deg. twist in armature Step 3: Temporarily remove the crank support block from the box assembly and insert the two 5/8” bushings into each side of the 5/8” hole drilled through the crank support block. Drill out the inner threads of the bushings to allow the 5/8” main drive hex bolt to turn freely, then reattach the crank support block back onto the box assembly. Step 4: Using a hammer and punch set, tap down the sharp anchors on the two 3/8” bushings. If desired, the sharp anchors may also be removed by a grinder using standard shop practices. Drill out the inside threads of both bushings and set aside for later assembly. Step 5: Place one washer onto the main drive hex bolt and attach the threaded 5/8” end of the 2 ½” long steel bar to the main drive hex bolt. Tighten bar onto main drive hex bolt, then add 58” nut to backside of main drive crank assembly to ensure tight fit. Additional washers may be required to obtain correct alignment of the main drive crank assembly with the armature assembly. Refer to figure 14 for configuration. Fig 14: Assembled main drive and armature mechanism Step 6: Place one washer onto 3/8” x 2” armature bolt and insert into 3/8” hole in the main drive crank assembly and tighten. Install a 3/8” hex nut, and tighten. Insert one washer, followed by one of the previously prepare 3/8” bushings, and place one end of the armature bar over the bushing, ensuring that it does not bind. Place another washer onto the armature hex bolt and complete the assembly by installing a 3/8” lock washer. Tighten assembly and ensure that the armature does not bind on the crank assembly. Refer to figure 11 for configuration. Additional washers may be required to adjust alignment of the crank mechanism. Step 7: Place the armature onto the top of the installed platform assembly, mark the spot where the hole in the armature rests on the platform and drill a 3/8” hole in the table’s platform. Insert the 3/8” x 2” bolt up through the bottom of the platform hole using a washer, followed by a 3/8” bushing (mounted flat side to top of platform). Attach the end of the armature over the bushing, then install a washer and complete with a 3/8” lock washer. See figure 15 for configuration. Fig 15: Armature attached to platform assembly Step 8: Lock hex bolt in electric drill and operate slowly for the first time to evaluate alignment of crank and armature mechanism and adjust as needed. Periodically check all assemblies during operation for tightness and wear. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Figure 16 depicts the final product (Note: disk crank assembly was replaced with more robust steel bar crank assembly in current revision) for reference. When using the shake table, secure it to the table it is resting on using clamps. This will prevent the shake table from walking when the drill is operating at higher RPMs. Use caution when operating shake table above 300 rpm as possible damage to the crank mechanism may occur. Expect to pay approximately $50 to $100 for a good drill. The rest of the materials should not exceed $50. The steel crank and armature components may require some machine time and this cost will vary. Therefore, Labor charges have not been calculated. Fig 16: Final Shake Table assembly (with superseded disk crank assembly)