Lecture Notes for Economics 435: Economics of Resources Prepared by Gunnar Knapp, Professor of Economics January 7, 2000 [revised by S. Colt on 15 Jan 2004] INTRODUCTION This course is an introduction to basic concepts in the economics of resources and the environment, and the application of these concepts to resource and environmental public policy issues. Resource economics uses standard principles and techniques of economics to examine questions relating to the management, use or allocation of natural resources, including the natural environment. Resource economics focuses on the benefits and costs of resource use over time, and how these benefits and costs are distributed among different groups. As with all economic analysis, resource economics can take a “positive” or a “normative” approach to an issue or question. These words are in quotes because they have specific meanings in economics. Positive economics is about what is, what was, or what will be – a description of reality. Normative economics is about what should be, or what ought to be. Using positive analysis we might conclude that “The wild salmon industry is going to become economically unviable under the current management regime.” If we were to say “The State of Alaska should re-introduce fish traps and auction off the right to use them to the highest bidders” that would be a normative statement. Property rights are very important in resource economics. How property rights are defined affects how resources are used and how different groups in society benefit from (or are harmed by) resource use. Time is an important consideration in resource economics, because how we use resources in one period often affects our options in other periods. One resource which is receiving ever more attention is the environment. Environmental economics has become an important field of its own. Economics of Resources Lecture Notes: Introduction, page 1 "Mainstream Resource Economics" This course presents "mainstream" concepts of resource economics, as they are perceived by most American economists. When I use the terms "resource economics" and "economists," I am referring to "mainstream" resource economics and "mainstream" economics. You may find you disagree with some of the conclusions of mainstream economics. That's OK. But you should still try to understand them--if only to argue against them more effectively or to know when they are abused or misapplied. Mainstream economists are sometimes accused of ignoring important resource problems, such as the effects of resource development upon the environment. In fact, economists are concerned about these problems, and have important insights as to why they occur and what can be done about them. If you keep an open mind, you may be surprised at how the breadth of issues mainstream economics deals with, and the perspectives that it offers. You may be disappointed that the course offers only limited alternative perspectives to mainstream resource economics. However, there are two good reasons for this. First, time for this course is very limited. In one semester, it is barely possible to cover even the most basic topics in mainstream resource economics. If you understand this approach to resource economics well, you will be better prepared to contrast it with other approaches. Second, my own knowledge about alternative perspectives is limited. Two Approaches to Mainstream Resource Economics Throughout the semester, we will be discussing mainstream resource economics from two different perspectives: Mainstream approach. The textbook presents a mainstream approach to resource economics, and much of the time I will also be presenting a mainstream approach. My goal is to help you learn to think about resources like an mainstream resource economist. Regardless of how you feel about it, it is important that you understand this mainstream approach. Critique of the mainstream approach. I am not entirely comfortable with the mainstream approach to resource economics. Over the course of the semester, in my lectures and through some readings, I will be discussing limitations of the mainstream approach, based on my own experience as an applied resource economist over the past twenty years in Alaska. These include: Mainstream resource economists are too quick to assume that "efficiency" should be the goal. Most mainstream economists focus on "economic efficiency" as the primary goal for resource utilization. My own experience suggests that many other factors--in particular the allocation of resource benefits--need to be considered and deserve more attention. Mainstream resource economists are too quick to make "normative" recommendations: Many mainstream economists are quick to offer "normative" recommendations about the "best" way to address resource issues, which are often Economics of Resources Lecture Notes: Introduction, page 2 based on the assumption that "efficiency" is or should be the goal. I believe economists should be more careful to separate their scientific analysis from their recommendations--which reflect their own value judgements. Mainstream resource economists don't pay enough attention to resource markets. Surprisingly, most textbooks devote relatively little attention to resource markets and prices. However, resource prices and the factors that affect prices are extremely important for most resource industries. Economics of Resources Lecture Notes: Introduction, page 3