DATE: MAY _________, 2015
ROOM: _______________
Senior Presentation Guidelines and Scoring for Committee Members
Student Name: _______________________________________
Evaluator: _______________________
Set-up time for the presentation is limited to 5 minutes. Student presentations should last no longer than 15-20 minutes with a 5 minute question
period. Total time for presentations will be limited to 30 minutes (including set-up). Please write the start and end times in the first row. If
presentations last longer than allotted time, please mark appropriately. Student will need a 30 average to pass..
Presentation was completed within the allotted
15-20 minute time-frame
Presentation Start Time_______________
PAPER WAS GIVEN TO COMMITTEE
MEMBERS PRIOR TO STARTING
PRESENTATION
NO _______YES ___________
Yes ____3pts No ______0pts
Presentation Finish Time______________
Preparation, Technology, Evaluator Needs and Time Frame
3 – Student was obviously aware of
2 – Student was able to set-up
1 – Student needed some help with
technology/room placement to ensure equipment with little or no help but
technology, needed to be asked to
time was well observed. If
seemed apprehensive or unaware of
move presentation board or was
/3
presentation board was used, student
evaluator needs (some could not see
unaware of the limits.
ensured all evaluators could see
throughout presentation). Time was
information.
observed well.
Organization
3 – Highly engaging introduction.
2 – Engaging introduction.
1 – Introduction and conclusion are
/3
Thoughtful transitions. Insightful
Transitions present. Logical flow.
present. Lacking or minimal
conclusion
Reflective conclusion.
transitions.
Visual Aids
3 – Enhances presentation. High
2 – Enhances presentation. Visible
1 – Reveals project process, effort is
/3
quality, visible and clearly reveals
with few problems. Reveals project
obvious. Difficult to see or read.
project process. No spelling errors.
process. Few or no spelling errors.
Errors evident.
Poise/Delivery Techniques
3 – Professional. Enthusiastic,
2 – Professional and engaging.
1 – Eye contact and voice projection
engaging, insightful and confident.
Confident and overall enthusiastic.
adequate but lacking in confidence.
/3
Eye contact and voice projection
Eye contact and voice projection
Unsure of information. Public
above average and highly effective.
average and effective. Obvious
speaking skills lacking
Obvious knowledge of information.
knowledge of information.
professionalism.
Appearance
3 – Clothing is appropriate and
2 – Clothing is appropriate and
1 – Clothing is appropriate (follows
contributes to professional,
professional may be inconsistent with school dress code) but slightly casual.
/3
conservative demeanor of speech.
conservative demeanor of speech.
Completely polished.
Questions
3 – Answered panel questions
2 – Answered panel questions
1 – Inadequate or uncertain answers
/3
exceptionally.
sufficiently.
were given.
Comments
/21 (this
page only)
0 – Student was obviously unaware of
time, unsure of technology, room
placement or set-up expectations.
0 – Difficult to follow progression of
speech. Unorganized.
0 – Poor quality, not visible or
difficult to read. Several obvious
errors (spelling or otherwise).
0 - Unprofessional. Not engaging.
Hesitant throughout presentation.
Voice projection and eye contact
weak.
0 – Unprofessional clothing (too
casual) not appropriate for interview
or speech. May not follow school
dress code.
0 – Answers were unclear or student
was unable to answer a significant
number of panel questions
DATE: MAY _________, 2015
/3
/3
/3
/3
/3
/3
/3
/3
SCORE
THIS
PAGE
/24
TOTAL
/45
Self-Assessment/Introduction
3 – Superior introduction to self.
Discusses personality traits, attributes
and past experience as part of reason
for career selection.
Career Research
3 – Superior explanation of career
including opportunities, advancement,
wages and placement.
History
3 – Superior explanation of history of
the career. Includes a time-line of
events both past and present to
explain impact on the future.
Job Shadow
3 – Superior explanation of
significance to future. Includes
detailed information about interviews
and discussions from job shadow as
well as reflection.
Community Service
3 – Superior explanation of
community service experience and
impact on the student and community.
Hours are obvious and complete.
Reflection is highly insightful.
Post High School Plans (5th year)
3 – Superior explanation of future
plans including college/post high
school information and career goals,
discussion of cost and plans for
payment.
Reflection
3 – Superior reflection. Very
insightful and easily understood
explanation of value, changes to the
student and suggestions for future
students.
Overall Product
3 – Superior quality. Far exceeds
minimum project requirements as
outlined on the rubric.
Comments
ROOM: _______________
2 – Good introduction to self.
Personality traits, attributes and past
experiences present but not related to
career selection.
1 – Inadequate introduction.
Information obviously lacking. Needs
significant improvement.
0 – No introduction present or very
weak. Needs significant
improvement.
2 – Good explanation of career
including opportunities, advancement,
wages and placement.
1 – Inadequate explanation of career.
Information obviously lacking. Needs
significant improvement.
0 – No explanation of career or very
weak. .
2 – Good explanation of career
history. History includes past
information but may lack significant
events or present information.
1 – Inadequate explanation of the
history of the career and significant
events.
0 – No explanation of history of
career or significant events or lacking
crucial information of the career.
2 – Good explanation of experience
and significance to future careers.
Includes some information about
interviews and experiences,
reflections present.
1 – Inadequate explanation of the
experience Information obviously
lacking. Needs significant
improvement.
0 – No explanation of job shadow or
very weak.
2 – Good explanation of community
service, the impact on the student and
the community. Hours are complete.
Reflection is present.
1 – Inadequate explanation of
community service. Hours or
information missing. Reflection is not
insightful. Needs significant
improvement.
0 - No explanation of career or very
weak.
2 - Good explanation of future plans
including college/post high school
information and career goals,
discussion of cost and plans for
payment.
1 – Inadequate explanation of future
plans. Information obviously lacking.
Needs significant improvement.
0 - No explanation of career or very
weak.
2 – Good reflection. Adequately
explains importance of the senior
project and suggestions for the future.
1 – Inadequate explanation of how the
process affected the student. Lacking
information about change or
suggestions about the future. Needs
significant improvement.
0 – No reflection of the process or
very weak.
2 – Good quality. Fulfills minimum
project requirements as outlined on
the rubric.
1 – Fair quality. Fulfills minimum
project requirements as outlined on
the rubric.
0 – Poor quality. Does not fulfill
minimum project requirements as
outlined on the rubric.