DATE: MAY _________, 2015 ROOM: _______________ Senior Presentation Guidelines and Scoring for Committee Members Student Name: _______________________________________ Evaluator: _______________________ Set-up time for the presentation is limited to 5 minutes. Student presentations should last no longer than 15-20 minutes with a 5 minute question period. Total time for presentations will be limited to 30 minutes (including set-up). Please write the start and end times in the first row. If presentations last longer than allotted time, please mark appropriately. Student will need a 30 average to pass.. Presentation was completed within the allotted 15-20 minute time-frame Presentation Start Time_______________ PAPER WAS GIVEN TO COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRIOR TO STARTING PRESENTATION NO _______YES ___________ Yes ____3pts No ______0pts Presentation Finish Time______________ Preparation, Technology, Evaluator Needs and Time Frame 3 – Student was obviously aware of 2 – Student was able to set-up 1 – Student needed some help with technology/room placement to ensure equipment with little or no help but technology, needed to be asked to time was well observed. If seemed apprehensive or unaware of move presentation board or was /3 presentation board was used, student evaluator needs (some could not see unaware of the limits. ensured all evaluators could see throughout presentation). Time was information. observed well. Organization 3 – Highly engaging introduction. 2 – Engaging introduction. 1 – Introduction and conclusion are /3 Thoughtful transitions. Insightful Transitions present. Logical flow. present. Lacking or minimal conclusion Reflective conclusion. transitions. Visual Aids 3 – Enhances presentation. High 2 – Enhances presentation. Visible 1 – Reveals project process, effort is /3 quality, visible and clearly reveals with few problems. Reveals project obvious. Difficult to see or read. project process. No spelling errors. process. Few or no spelling errors. Errors evident. Poise/Delivery Techniques 3 – Professional. Enthusiastic, 2 – Professional and engaging. 1 – Eye contact and voice projection engaging, insightful and confident. Confident and overall enthusiastic. adequate but lacking in confidence. /3 Eye contact and voice projection Eye contact and voice projection Unsure of information. Public above average and highly effective. average and effective. Obvious speaking skills lacking Obvious knowledge of information. knowledge of information. professionalism. Appearance 3 – Clothing is appropriate and 2 – Clothing is appropriate and 1 – Clothing is appropriate (follows contributes to professional, professional may be inconsistent with school dress code) but slightly casual. /3 conservative demeanor of speech. conservative demeanor of speech. Completely polished. Questions 3 – Answered panel questions 2 – Answered panel questions 1 – Inadequate or uncertain answers /3 exceptionally. sufficiently. were given. Comments /21 (this page only) 0 – Student was obviously unaware of time, unsure of technology, room placement or set-up expectations. 0 – Difficult to follow progression of speech. Unorganized. 0 – Poor quality, not visible or difficult to read. Several obvious errors (spelling or otherwise). 0 - Unprofessional. Not engaging. Hesitant throughout presentation. Voice projection and eye contact weak. 0 – Unprofessional clothing (too casual) not appropriate for interview or speech. May not follow school dress code. 0 – Answers were unclear or student was unable to answer a significant number of panel questions DATE: MAY _________, 2015 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 SCORE THIS PAGE /24 TOTAL /45 Self-Assessment/Introduction 3 – Superior introduction to self. Discusses personality traits, attributes and past experience as part of reason for career selection. Career Research 3 – Superior explanation of career including opportunities, advancement, wages and placement. History 3 – Superior explanation of history of the career. Includes a time-line of events both past and present to explain impact on the future. Job Shadow 3 – Superior explanation of significance to future. Includes detailed information about interviews and discussions from job shadow as well as reflection. Community Service 3 – Superior explanation of community service experience and impact on the student and community. Hours are obvious and complete. Reflection is highly insightful. Post High School Plans (5th year) 3 – Superior explanation of future plans including college/post high school information and career goals, discussion of cost and plans for payment. Reflection 3 – Superior reflection. Very insightful and easily understood explanation of value, changes to the student and suggestions for future students. Overall Product 3 – Superior quality. Far exceeds minimum project requirements as outlined on the rubric. Comments ROOM: _______________ 2 – Good introduction to self. Personality traits, attributes and past experiences present but not related to career selection. 1 – Inadequate introduction. Information obviously lacking. Needs significant improvement. 0 – No introduction present or very weak. Needs significant improvement. 2 – Good explanation of career including opportunities, advancement, wages and placement. 1 – Inadequate explanation of career. Information obviously lacking. Needs significant improvement. 0 – No explanation of career or very weak. . 2 – Good explanation of career history. History includes past information but may lack significant events or present information. 1 – Inadequate explanation of the history of the career and significant events. 0 – No explanation of history of career or significant events or lacking crucial information of the career. 2 – Good explanation of experience and significance to future careers. Includes some information about interviews and experiences, reflections present. 1 – Inadequate explanation of the experience Information obviously lacking. Needs significant improvement. 0 – No explanation of job shadow or very weak. 2 – Good explanation of community service, the impact on the student and the community. Hours are complete. Reflection is present. 1 – Inadequate explanation of community service. Hours or information missing. Reflection is not insightful. Needs significant improvement. 0 - No explanation of career or very weak. 2 - Good explanation of future plans including college/post high school information and career goals, discussion of cost and plans for payment. 1 – Inadequate explanation of future plans. Information obviously lacking. Needs significant improvement. 0 - No explanation of career or very weak. 2 – Good reflection. Adequately explains importance of the senior project and suggestions for the future. 1 – Inadequate explanation of how the process affected the student. Lacking information about change or suggestions about the future. Needs significant improvement. 0 – No reflection of the process or very weak. 2 – Good quality. Fulfills minimum project requirements as outlined on the rubric. 1 – Fair quality. Fulfills minimum project requirements as outlined on the rubric. 0 – Poor quality. Does not fulfill minimum project requirements as outlined on the rubric.