Call for Papers: Themed Issue on ‘Where are we with feminist methods?’ Debates, tools, and practices have expanded considerably since the signifier ‘feminist’ first attached itself to ‘method’ and ‘methodology’. Early discussions suggested that feminism required a distinct approach to empirical inquiry; one that recognised and challenged systemic gender disparities, validated women’s ‘experience’, rejected hierarchies between the researcher and research participant, and had emancipation as its ultimate purpose and goal. Some of these early defining claims and their related developments have had uptake and have been used to experiment with method. Others have been recast in a wide range of practices and fields that move beyond the category of ‘woman’ to include non-human and inhuman modes of relating in areas such as science and technology studies, epigenomics, and climatology. Yet, a commitment to make feminism mean something in the doing of empirical research, cultural analysis, artistic practice and in activism, has continued to both subvert and supplement the idea of a distinct feminist methodological imperative. How might we make sense of the continuing attachment to the idea of feminist methods and methodologies? In what ways are methods being (re)framed and approached, including in teaching, the use of tools and techniques, participatory practices, knowledge exchange networks, reflexivity and the understanding of ethics? What methods are evolving to face the challenge of newly coordinated social realities where the porous, non-linear, and virtual are entangled with enduring material and geo-social inequalities? By posing such questions we hope to incite contributions that will shed new light on the evolving concerns and implementation of methodological practices in feminist projects and in interdisciplinary working. We welcome papers based in any discipline that describe, discuss, and interrogate methodological experiences, debates, tools and praxis and that engage with one or all of the following questions: 1. What are the defining features of feminist methodology? 2. What methods, analytic frameworks, and/or methodological collaborations are being used and/or are needed? What are the challenges that are being faced? 3. How are feminists teaching methods, including in participative community based projects, in Higher Education, in other forms of training and knowledge exchange, and in places that are hostile to feminism? Possible topics include, but are not limited to explorations of: New methodological tools and approaches Quantitative methods, measure and value Methods of making and producing problems Ethical dilemmas and/or reflexive practice Performativity, arts-based practices and experimentation Digital methods, cyber communication and/or working with e-networks and communities Temporality and/or topology Observation Empiricism and affect, including psychoanalytic, multi-sensory and posthuman approaches Postcolonial, multisited and/or indigenous methods Research in conflict zones Risk and danger in the field Investigating disasters, crisis and vulnerability Corporate cultures and feminist methods Queer ontologies, methodologies and ethics Funding, governance and/or securitization User and public engagement and involvement Issue editors: Yasmin Gunaratnam, Carrie Hamilton and Ioana Szeman. Deadline for first drafts of papers marked clearly ‘METHODS’ submitted online and following Feminist Review guidelines (http://www.palgravejournals.com/fr/author_instructions.html) by 1 September 2015. The editors are happy to discuss possible papers informally with potential contributors. Please contact: y.gunaratnam@gold.ac.uk; c.hamilton@roehampton.ac.uk; i.szeman@roehampton.ac.uk