Supplemental Material High Electric Energy Storage Density of Poly(vinylidene fluoride) in -Form Crystal Domain Wenjing Li, Yuansuo Zheng, Zhicheng Zhang a) Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Science, MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China, 710049 Weimin Xia, Zhuo Xu Electronic Materials Research Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China 1. FTIR of -, β- and -PVDF films In -PVDF film, the -phase could be confirmed by the characteristic absorption bands at 408, 532, 614, 764, 796, 855, and 976 cm-1. The small peak at about 840 cm-1 may attributed to -phase in minority. The absorption bands at 431, 512, 776, 812, 833, and 840 cm-1 observed in -PVDF film are characteristic -phase PVDF, which confirms the majority of -phase crystal in this film. The bands at 444 and 510 cm-1 are regarded as characteristic of the β phase, which is distinguished from -PVDF1. All the information indicates that the samples applied possess the majority of the corresponding crystal phase as desired. 840 773 Transmittance 605 433 812 512 484 445 410 855 1423 1600 1393 1400 795 975 1280 1150 1070 1200 1000 877 765 800 530 615 490 600 400 -1 Wave Number(cm ) FIG S1. FTIR and assignment of PVDF in -, β- and -form crystal phase 2. XRD and DSC of - and -PVDF films treated in different thermal process - and -PVDF films are treated in different thermal processes including solution casting as received marked as untreated, quenching from 200 oC to ice-water immediately marked as quenched and cooling from 200oC gradually to room temperature in 24 hours marked as annealed. The XRD results and the assignment are presented in Fig. S1. The results indicate that different thermal treatment processes exhibit limited influence on the crystal forms of the films. DSC results are shown in Fig. S2. Annealing may improve the crystallinity of the films slightly. However, quenching is able to reduce the crystallinity of PVDF films greatly. -PVDF 20.2 (021) 17.94 (100) 26.8 (022) 1 untreated 2 quenched 3 annealed 27.92 (100) -PVDF 20.1 (110) PVDF 40 18.5 (020) 38.7 (211) 39 (002) 36.12 (200) 1 I/I0 I/I0 3 1 untreated 2 quenched 3 annealed 2 2 18.4 (020) 39 (002) 15 20 25 30 35 40 1 45 3 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 o 2 ( ) FIG S2. XRD and assignment of - and -PVDF films treated in different thermal process. 175 -PVDF quenched annealed untreated 172 60.3J/g 58.6J/g 174 -PVDF Heat Flow(a.u.) Heat Flow annealed untreated quenched 173 173 44J/g 56J/g 39.8J/g 40 60 80 100 120 140 Temperature(C) 175 53J/g 160 180 200 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Temperature(C) FIG S3. DSC of - and -PVDF films treated in different thermal process. 3. Dielectric constant () and loss (tan) of - and -PVDF films treated in different thermal process As shown in Fig. S3, thermal treatment leads to significant influence on the dielectric properties of -PVDF. Both the dielectric constant and loss of the three samples are in the order of quenched film>untreated film>annealed film, which is in the same order of H or the crystallinity of the corresponding samples observed from DSC. It is well known that the dielectric constant and loss in low electric field is more related to the noncrystaline phase of the sample. The similar results are observed in -PVDF as well. Apparently, quenching leads to a lower crystallinity therefore higher dielectric response, and annealing favors the crystalline phase therefore low dielectric response. 16 0.5 Annealed Untreated Quenched 14 12 0.5 0.4 0.4 8 10 0.3 r' (Untreated) (Quenched) 4 0.2 0.1 4 -PVDF 2 0 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 2 0.0 0 2 10 0.0 6 10 0.1 7 10 10 3 10 4 5 10 Frequency(Hz) 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 Frequecy(Hz) FIG S4. Dielectric constant () and loss (tan) of -PVDF treated in different processes. 4. XRD of quenched -PVDF film and -PVDF film after poled in an electric field beyond 300MV/m XRD results of the quenched -PVDF and poled -PVDF in the electric field beyond 300MV/m are shown in Fig. S4. All the reflections of the poled -PVDF coincide perfectly with the quenched -PVDF, which confirms the phase transition of - to -PVDF induced by the electric field. I/I0 1 quenched -PVDF 2 poled -PVDF 1 2 10 20 30 40 50 60 2 FIG S5. XRD comparison of quenched -PVDF and poled -PVDF in the electric field beyond 300MV/m. 5. Unipolar D-E hysteresis loops of β-PVDF measured in the tan 0.2 6 0.3 6 tan 8 r' -PVDF 10 increasing electric field. The D-E hysteresis loops of uniaxially stretched β-PVDF are measured in the increasing electric field as shown in Fig. S5. As electric field increases, the loops expand in parallel with each other gradually. All the loops are very slim. 2 Displacement (C/m ) 0.04 -PVDF 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 50 100 150 200 E(MV/m) FIG S6. Unipolar D-E loops of β-PVDF as a function of electric field.