Clinical Practice Specialist Rating Guide Check all items that most accurately describe the employee’s typical performance over the course of the review period. Use this as a guide to determining the most accurate overall rating. OVERALL RATING Unsatisfactory (<5%) Did not meet key objectives established. Performance was below expectations in essential areas of responsibility, with goals and objectives missed. Contribution is typically below that of peers of incumbents in comparable positions. Needs Improvement (<10%) Job performance sometimes met though sometimes fell short of expectations and contribution. Performance was less than that of many other employees at peer levels. Improvement is needed. Met/Exceeded Expectations (70% to 80%) Fully met or exceeded all key objectives. Individuals who achieve this rating are widely recognized as strong and valued contributors. 1. To what extent does the Clinical Practice Specialist help the Department maximize reimbursements for services? Doesn't know, understand or correctly apply knowledge of coding, billing, or contracts with payors. Errors lead to financial loss. Lacks sufficient technical knowledge to consistently perform with expected accuracy or analyze data. Solid knowledge of coding, billing, medical terminology and contracts with payors Ability to analyze contracted fees versus actual reimbursements leads to improved reimbursement rates. Investigates, resolves difficult billing problems. Develops procedures to improve systems, work processes and policies. Regularly uncovers areas to optimize reimbursement that others have missed. 2. How does the Clinical Practice Specialist know and support the Department’s billing compliance? Doesn't know, understand or apply legal requirements, policies and procedures correctly. Compliance/audit records are incomplete, inaccurate, nonexistent. Not current with compliance issues. Inconsistently applies legal requirements, policies and procedures. Records are often incomplete or inaccurate. Solid understanding of legal requirements, policies and procedures in area of responsibility. Keeps Department informed about changes. Audits medical charts to ensure that records match coding. Works with physicians and staff on issues that affect current reporting procedures. Develops training programs, manuals & communications on procedural guidelines, new regulations and changes in contracts. 3. Describe the amount of work that the Clinical Practice Specialist has accomplished over the review period. Cannot be counted on to get work done. Does not understand what are priorities or understands them and still does not work on them. Inconsistently gets work done. Not seen as someone who does fair share of the work. Sets work priorities and completes appropriate volume of work; takes on a fair share of the work. Tracks progress and makes necessary adjustments. Does more than fair share of the work. Looks for more effective and efficient processes to complete tasks. 4. Describe the quality of the work that the Clinical Practice Specialist has accomplished over the review period. Work is almost always found to have errors. Lack of knowledge creates more work. Work is frequently found to have errors. Work is often incomplete or inaccurate. Work is occasionally found to have errors. Work is rarely found to have errors. Occasionally misses deadlines. Meets almost all deadlines. Has rarely or never missed a deadline. 2/12/2016 Unintentionally misses problems. Sometimes fails to inform effected parties. RATING 1 2 3 4 Researches and analyzes market trends and their impact on reimbursement. Recognized for professional knowledge of coding and billing the School and within department. RATING 1 2 3 4 Creates procedures to help ensure 100% compliance within the Department. Considered the "go-to" person in department for information on legal requirements, policies and procedures. RATING 1 2 3 4 Knows what results are important & achieves those results. Highly organized and efficient; is known as someone who “gets things done.” RATING 1 2 3 4 Work is never found to have errors. Has never missed a deadline. RATING 1 2 3 4 6. Describe how the Clinical Practice Specialist deals with problems. Does not recognize a problem or sees the problem and does nothing about it. Does not inform others of problems. Achieved breakthrough results against challenging goals; made a unique contribution to university, school or dept objectives; recognized by all as “stand out” performers. RATING 1 2 3 4 5. To what extent does does the Clinical Practice Specialist meet deadlines? Doesn't anticipate, confuses or misses deadlines completely. Does not understand the importance of deadlines. Exceptional (<20%) Knows where to go to resolve problems. Deals with existing problems and offers solutions Alerts people to potential problems.. 1 Anticipates problems and quickly acts on them. Anticipates problems and creates solutions to avoid future problems. Unsatisfactory (<5%) Did not meet key objectives established. Performance was below expectations in essential areas of responsibility, with goals and objectives missed. Contribution is typically below that of peers of incumbents in comparable positions. Needs Improvement (<10%) Job performance sometimes met though sometimes fell short of expectations and contribution. Performance was less than that of many other employees at peer levels. Improvement is needed. Met/Exceeded Expectations (70% to 80%) Fully met or exceeded all key objectives. Individuals who achieve this rating are widely recognized as strong and valued contributors. Exceptional (<20%) Achieved breakthrough results against challenging goals; made a unique contribution to university, school or dept objectives; recognized by all as “stand out” performers. 7. To what extent has the Clinical Practice Specialist established credibility and trusting relationships with faculty and staff? Faculty and staff refuse to work with individual; complains to supervisor or Chair. Faculty and staff go to supervisor rather than individual with questions because of worry about accuracy. Works closely with faculty and staff to understand their concerns and perspective. Goes directly to physicians when there's a problem. Develops trusting relationships. Educates Department on policies and procedures. Requires continual oversight. Rigorous training is required for most new situations. Frequently requires retraining. Requires normal review and follow-up from supervisor. Requires normal amount of training to develop skills, ability. Little oversight, comes to supervisor is needed. Regularly takes training to develop new, higher level skills. 9. To what extent does the Clinical Practice Specialist have a positive impact on the Department? Performance and/or attitude disrupts work environment. Creates more work for unit. 2/12/2016 Inconsistent work habits sometimes disrupt work environment Fosters cooperation and teamwork. Enables unit to perform at proper level. 2 Establishes strong partnerships with others. People trust and value advice and opinions. RATING 1 2 3 4 8. How much supervision does the Clinical Practice Specialist require? Requires excessive oversight. All work must be reviewed and corrected. Training often protracted, unsuccessful. RATING 1 2 3 4 Easily identified as a high contributor. Sought for assistance or advice in getting work done. Little or no follow-up is required. Recognized for leadership potential. RATING 1 2 3 4 Develops new ideas which reduce expenses or improve unit effectiveness.