The Frontiers of Knowledge laureate in Information and Communication Technologies will pick up his award today in the BBVA Foundation Marvin Minsky: “We should concentrate on studying the brains of simpler animals, like dragonflies” For Minsky, honored for his founding role in artificial intelligence, the reason the area is advancing so slowly is the lack of support for “young people with good ideas” “What are people but highly evolved machines?,” asks Minsky, who remains convinced that machine intelligence will one day surpass that of humans In the view of the jury, the artificial intelligence field that Minsky helped launch, has contributed decisively to enlarging the role of computers – from calculating machines to universal machines – and facilitating more intuitive forms of interaction between people and computerized devices. Madrid, June 16, 2014.- Marvin Minsky, winner of the BBVA Foundation Frontiers of Knowledge Award in the Information and Communication Technologies category for his founding role in artificial intelligence, considers it “a sheer waste of time” to invest effort and resources on major programs investigating the human brain, like those under way in the U.S. and European Union. “What we should do is study the brains of simpler animals, like a dragonfly, for instance”. Minsky, aged 87, currently Professor Emeritus of Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, will pick up his award this evening at a ceremony in the BBVA Foundation’s Madrid headquarters, in recognition of his role in creating the artificial intelligence field. The scientist, says the jury, has worked “on systems integrating robotics, language, perception and planning,” and his developments on these and other fronts “have shaped the field of artificial intelligence.” “Few people embody the spirit of the Frontiers of Knowledge Awards like Marvin Minsky, who has not only created a new field but has also nurtured its progress through the decades,” observed Rafael Pardo, Director of the BBVA Foundation at yesterday’s press call. Minsky expounded his view that large research programs into the workings of the human brain are not worth the effort: “Let’s have a thousand projects with one million dollars for some young person to do significant research, and not pour billions of dollars into a single project studying the human brain,” he protests. “Because the people leading that project do not know what to look for”. He also stands by his vision of the human brain as essentially a “meat machine”: “What are people if not highly evolved machines?”, he asked at the press call. And remains as convinced as ever that machine intelligence will eventually surpass that of humans. But artificial intelligence has progressed little and slowly compared to its initial promise, and one of the reasons, Minsky argues, is the lack of support for basic research. “There was a great acceleration of research on artificial intelligence from the 1950s through to the 1980s”, he points out, but after this “golden age”, as he calls it, “university research slowed right down.” Minsky also pointed out the “great paradox” that artificial intelligence and computer science in general thrived under the aegis of the military research program, which after the Second World War had huge amounts of money and very few restraints. Exactly “the opposite of civilian research,” where researchers, he contends, are under pressure to produce quick results in order to justify the money spent. So military research ended up being “freer and more imaginative” than its civilian equivalent. To get the field back on track, his recipe is to “give more help to people with good ideas,” especially young people, who find it impossible to get long-term appointments. “Many institutions say they support independent research, but most actually get in its way.” Asked about the dangers of tomorrow’s hypothetical intelligent machines, Minsky argues that “any new system can suffer accidents, especially at the start. Everyone understands that progress involves certain risks. It’s a question of the trade-off between future advantage and present disadvantage. As a society we have to have rules to prevent some people taking risks that are too large for others to bear.” And he adds: “If you want a better answer, ask your favorite politician. And good luck.” Last February, after being informed of the award, Minsky drew comparisons between how fast humans and machines are able to evolve: “The intelligence of computers will keep increasing, and in each aspect of cognition and life, problem-solving and understanding, [the machines] will only get better. People will also get a little better, but the problem with people is that when someone becomes very good at a certain skill, and that person dies, the skill is lost, because we don’t have an explicit representation yet of how a human brain does complicated tasks.” Basic and applied contributions Minsky is a mathematician, but has chosen to spend most of his time exploring other terrains, because, he claims, he met so many mathematicians better than himself. In his varied career, he has alternated basic or fundamental contributions with others of an applied nature, in a spectrum of fields that spans mathematics, cognitive science, robotics and philosophy. What finally awakened his ambition to construct thinking machines was his fascination for the human brain and an encounter with a book – Mathematical Biophysics by Nicolas Rashevsky – which mathematically described the workings of biological systems. His PhD thesis, which he defended at Princeton University in 1954, explored how to construct neural networks capable of learning. Just two years later, artificial intelligence officially came into being as a discipline at a computer science conference in Dartmouth College (New Hampshire, United States), with Minsky, John McCarthy, Allen Newell and Herbert Simon as its architects. Within the field, Minsky has led the quest to endow computers with common sense, the challenge being how to teach a computer what comes easily to the youngest child. “We rarely recognize how wonderful it is that a person can traverse an entire lifetime without making a really serious mistake, like putting a fork in one’s eye or using a window instead of a door,” writes Minsky in one of his best-known books, The Society of Mind. In 1959, Minsky joined the faculty at MIT, where he and McCarthy co-founded the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. His curriculum was by then already rich in practical achievements: the first neural network learning machine, SNARC, a device made out of vacuum tubes (1951); and the confocal scanning microscope (1955), still widely used in biology for its ability to reconstruct 3D images. And the list would continue with new contributions like the first headmounted graphical display (1963); a robotic arm (1967), now on show at Boston’s Museum of Science; or a small computer-controlled robot, the LOGO “turtle” (1972), which draws as it moves. From there, he would go on to publish his great conceptual contributions. In 1974, his theory of frames postulated that knowledge can be represented by previously acquired stereotypes or ‘frames’. In 1987’s The Society of Mind, he argued that intelligence arises from the interaction of myriad non-intelligent parts. And in The Emotion Machine (2006) he characterized emotions as simply the product of a different level of mental processing, another way of solving problems. But Minsky’s creativity has not been confined solely to the lab: a keen fan of science fiction, he was an advisor to Stanley Kubrick on 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and gave Michael Crichton the underlying idea for Jurassic Park (1990). Although the goal of an intelligent machine may still be a long way off, many experts acknowledge that artificial intelligence has contributed much of the thought behind the computer as we know it, the first universal, ubiquitous machine that we can interact with intuitively. In the closing words of the BBVA Foundation Frontiers of Knowledge Awards jury, “Minsky’s high-impact contributions have inspired researchers all over the world.” For more information, contact the BBVA Foundation Communication Department (+34 91 374 5210 / +34 91 537 3769, comunicacion@fbbva.es) or visit www.fbbva.es