Monahan 1 Analyzing Burke and Pisgah phase pottery in Western North Carolina using X-Ray Fluorescence Cassandra Monahan April 8, 2011 Monahan 2 Abstract Archaeologists can tell many things from ceramics which may include outside cultural influences. The Pisgah culture (1000-1550 AD), which is present at the Warren Wilson site, is mostly found on the headwaters of the French Broad and Little Tennessee Rivers (Dickens 1970). The Burke culture (1400-1600 AD), which is found at the Berry site, is concentrated in the Upper Catawba River Valley (Moore 2002). Although these two cultures exhibit relatively different types of ceramics, excavations among the Burke culture at the Berry archeological site in Morganton, North Carolina, has uncovered pottery that exhibits a Pisgah style while containing a Burke composition, possibly implying a blending between the two cultures. Through the use of X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis, I compare the pottery found at the Berry Site to the pottery found at the Warren Wilson site in Swannanoa, North Carolina. Using historical documents as a foundation I analyze Burke, Pisgah and the intermediate pottery with XRF to a) examine possible cultural influences and b) to determine whether XRF is an appropriate tool for this type of analysis. Monahan 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Research Questions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 What is X-Ray Fluorescence and how is it used archaeologically?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Discussing the Possibility of Trade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 The Juan Pardo Expedition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 The Pisgah Phase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 The Burke Phase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 The Blended Pottery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Purpose of Study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Methods and Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Sampling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Instrumentation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Data Analysis and Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22 Limitations and Delimitations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Significance of Study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Monahan 4 Appendix A: List of Figures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Appendix B: Averaged Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 Research Questions While both the Pisgah and Burke phase have been studied independently no one has studied possible links between the two. Is XRF an appropriate tool to use in Western North Carolina? Are Burke phase pottery and Pisgah phase pottery from the Piedmont of North Carolina compositionally similar or different? Is the intermediate pottery found on the Berry and Ensley sites more compositionally similar to Burke or Pisgah phase pottery? What is X-Ray Fluorescence analysis and how is it used archaeologically? X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis is a type of analysis being used in archaeology in multiple ways. Archaeologists have used XRF to analyze obsidian, basalt, Roman pottery, pottery glazes, Peruvian pottery and pipe fragments and pottery sherds to establish chronology (Bower et al. 1986, Druc 2004, Hatcher et al. 1994, Kirch 1996, Kuhn & Sempowski 2001). The XRF device emits beams of X-rays at the sample; these beams excite certain electrons in the inner shells of the atom to move to a higher shell (Renfrew and Bahn 2000). These electrons quickly revert back to their former places and in the process emit characteristic X-rays which the XRF device measures to determine the sample’s composition (Renfrew and Bahn 2000). Monahan 5 Archaeologists in the Southwestern United States have used XRF to analyze obsidian artifacts and trace their sources (Shackley 1988). In Polynesia there is an absence of ceramic and obsidian artifacts, which are the most common artifacts used for analysis (Kirch 1996). In this case archaeologists used XRF on basalt, a stone, which is prevalent in Polynesian artifacts to trace trade routes and source sites (Kirch 1996). In both of these cases the researchers found XRF to be a very helpful tool which gave them results which could not have been discerned from only studying the surface of the artifact. Not only has XRF aided archaeologists in their analysis of stone artifacts but also with analysis of pottery. XRF has been used archaeologically on pottery in the Southwestern United States to determine the sources of Rio Grande glaze (Bower et al. 1986). Through their analysis Bower et al were able to link archaeology sites where the glaze was present with other sites and find possible sources for the glaze (1986). XRF has also been used in the Northeastern United States to determine a date for the formation of the Iroquois nation (Kuhn and Sempowski 2001). Archaeologists have used XRF and PIXE (particle X-ray emission) to analyze Mohawk pottery sherds and pipe fragments found at multiple Seneca sites (Kuhn and Sempowski 2001). They then compared their results to their analysis of Seneca pottery sherds and pipe fragments found at multiple Mohawk sites (Kuhn and Sempowski 2001). Through their analysis they were able to determine a tentative date for the formation on the League of the five Nations Iroquois (Kuhn and Sempowski 2001). Archaeologists have also used XRF for a comprehensive analysis of Roman pottery, especially examination of the body sherds (Hatcher et al. 1994)At Chavin de Huantar, Peru, archeologists had known that trade had occurred through the spread of Chavin culture (Druc Monahan 6 2004). However, they wanted to explore further if there were different levels of trading and if a timeline could be established (Druc 2004). Through their analysis, using XRF, they concluded that over 30% of the pottery on-site was non-local and that there was dramatic shift in ceramic production over time (Druc 2004). XRF is therefore a helpful tool for archaeologists because of its ability to determine composition and therefore aid in identifying similarities and sources. And, as the last study shows, it can be helpful in identifying non-local pottery. Discussing the Possibility of Trade Theories regarding the understanding of trade in archaeology are numerous (Renfrew & Bahn 2000). An approach that has proven helpful and accurate is the idea of three different modes of exchange (Renfrew and Bahn 2000:354). The three modes of exchange explained in this model are reciprocity, redistribution and market exchange (Renfrew and Bahn 2000:354). Reciprocity as a mode of exchange involves one individual giving a valuable object to another individual without the expectation of immediate reciprocation (Renfrew and Bahn 2000:354). Instead, the individuals operate in a circle of exchange expecting in return stronger social relations (Renfrew and Bahn 2000:354). When one individual needs help with a task, like building a dwelling, they will call on those who they have exchanged objects with to help him/her (Renfrew and Bahn 2000:354). Redistribution involves a central location where goods are sent to be distributed elsewhere through trade (Renfrew and Bahn 2000:354). In this mode of exchange the individual producing the goods doesn’t necessarily have contact with the person receiving them (Renfrew and Bahn 2000:354). Lastly, market exchange is where a central location exists where individuals can go to sell and buy goods and where an agreed upon form of payment exists, i.e. bartering or material money (Renfrew and Bahn 2000:354). Monahan 7 Other theories regarding trade/exchange include focus on the broad distribution and use of specific raw materials (such as obsidian) and focus on the specification of traded items (i.e. utilitarian/ceremonial, domestic/burial) (Adams 1992). They include the study of central places that played key roles in trade (Adams 1992). What most of these theories emphasize is the connection between sites (Adams 1992). Limited research addresses the connection between sites and the variations in the amount and type of traded items (Adams 1992). Because of this, there is a need for more research to understand the connection between different archaeological sites. Sometimes historical documents can aid archaeologists in understanding an area/site’s relationship with its neighbors; including, but not limited to, whether or not they traded goods with them. This is not always the case and historical documents are not always the most reliable but in the case of Western North Carolina we do have the Juan Pardo documents which do suggest that the Berry site, whose native name is Joara, was a prominent town (Hudson 2005). The Juan Pardo Expeditions Juan Pardo began his first expedition from the Spanish fort of Santa Elena, located in present-day South Carolina, in December of 1566 (Figure 1). The goal of his, and his predecessor Hernando de Soto who set out in the same direction in 1540, was to find gold and establish forts so the Spanish could transport silver safely on land from their mines in Mexico. When Juan Pardo first reached the town of Joara he set up a Fort, which he named Fort San Juan, and returned to Santa Elena because the next leg of his journey, the mountains, were impassible due to snow. When he returned he found that the man that he had left in charge had already gone ahead into the mountains (Hudson 1994). Monahan 8 While Pardo was at Joara he not only met with the chief of the town, who he called Joara Mico, but also several chiefs from other towns in the region (five on his first trip, eighteen on his second). Pardo noted that Joara Mico was the most important of those present Figure 1 (Hudson 2005). The Pisgah Phase Within the longer Mississippian period there exists the Pisgah phase (1000-1550 AD). Pisgah phase distribution includes the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Piedmont region of North Carolina (Figure 2). Pisgah pottery temper is composed of either river sand, mica (although this most likely a property of the clay) and crushed quartz. All Pisgah designs appear to have been applied with a carved paddle whose application probably began at the bottom of the vessel and then continued upward making a new row above the previous one (Dickens 1976). Monahan 9 At the Warren Wilson site 88% of the pottery has Rectilinear Complicated Stamping which has three different designs; A, B and C. The more prevalent, Design A (see Figure 3 & 4), consists of two, three or four vertical grooves flanked by eight or more horizontal grooves; the horizontal grooves are usually shorter and closer together than the vertical grooves. The horizontal Figure 2 lines appear most often long and thick but also do appear short with the raised portions narrow (Dickens 1976). Monahan 10 Figure 3 Figure 4 The vertical or horizontal grooves are slanted in Rectilinear Design B, distinguishing it from Design A. Within Rectilinear Design B there are also three different types: in one the grooves form a zig-zag where the parallel lines meet at the joint (Figure 5), in another openended “V”s are imposed onto the parallel lines (Figure 6) and in the last type the vertical grooves are parallel but their flanking lines are slanted and all run in the same direction (see Figures 7 & 8). Rectilinear Design C is the least common and its pattern consists of the parallel lines forming rectangles (Figure 9) (Dickens 1976). Figure 6 Figure 5 Monahan 11 Figure 8 Figure 7 Figure 9 While the vast majority of Pisgah pottery has a Rectilinear Complicated stamping on it a small, but still significant percentage, has Pisgah Curvilinear Complicated stamping which is divided into two Designs; A and B. Design A (Figure 10) is the most frequent and exhibits a pair of concentric circles that are separated from and adjacent pair of circles by a single groove. Design B (Figure 11) is characterized by two interlocking scrolls with one side of each being Monahan 12 flanked with several parallel grooves. The last stamping found on Pisgah pottery is Check Stamped that was most likely applied with a carved paddle and exhibits a checked design whose individual design is usually square. Plain exterior treatment is also found in Pisgah series (Dickens 1976). Figure 10 Figure 11 One of the most distinguishing features of Pisgah pottery is the decoration of its ceramic rims and it appears that the form of the rim had a correlation in determining its decoration. Collared rims are when a piece of clay is taken and applied to the vessel; the application of another piece of clay to the vessel is called an appliqué (Figure 12). Collared rim decorations vary but most often have short, angled punctations that occur in two to three parallel rows; these decorations are usually arranged diagonally to the rim and the direction alternates after each row. Other collared rims decorations include one or two horizontal incised lines, combinations of punctations and incised lines and to a lesser degree oblique-patterned incised lines or no decoration (Dickens 1976). Monahan 13 fydsfds Figure 12 In the case of thickened rims, which are rims that have been made thicker without the use of appliqué, their designs are very similar to collared rims except on a smaller scale because without the use of appliqué the rim is smaller (Figures 13, 14 & 15). Because of this one of the more common decorations on thickened rims is one or two rows of punctations or a single line of incisions. The last type of Pisgah rim is unmodified; they are decorated about half of the time either in the fashion of collared rims or with the use of appliqué strip with pinches applied along the top of the lip (Dickens 1976). Figure 14 Figure 13 Monahan 14 Figure 15 The Burke Phase Burke phase archaeology sites have been found along the upper Catawba and Yadkin Rivers in the Piedmont region of North Carolina (Figure 16). The most distinctive feature of Burke ceramics is soapstone (steatite) tempering; the size of the soapstone chunks varies in color and size. Sand, grit, schist and crushed quartz also occur along with the soapstone in the temper of Burke ceramics (Moore 2002). Monahan 15 Figure 16 Usually 30-60% of a Burke ceramic assemblage has Curvilinear Complicated stamping (Figure 17 & 18) of which there are three designs. The designs in the first type are relatively small and consist of even lands and grooves. Its designs consist of keyholes, figure eights and fylfot scrolls/crosses. The second design includes concentric circles, bull’s-eyes and barred ovals. The lands and grooves are even and there are normally four lines around the design (Moore 2002). Monahan 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 The last type consists of concentric circles, spirals, bull’s-eyes and eccentric curves that are joined by parallel arcs occasionally nested squares or diamonds. The third type’s designs are larger and were applied to the exterior surface more firmly and consist of irregular lands and grooves. The majority of sherds with Curvilinear Complicated stamped designs have punctation or notching decoration on their rim. Notching appears as a “U” or “V” shaped impression on the lip or shoulder of the vessel (Figure 19). Punctation appears as single rows of circular or oblique on the lip (Moore 2002). Figure 19 Monahan 17 Burke Incised vessels stand out not in their exterior surface treatment but in their incising along the rim. Their exterior and interior surfaces are either burnished or plain/smoothed; very occasionally the interior is scraped. The vessel are either carinated, extremely inslanting rims, or wide-mouthed with inslanting rims and the lip is usually flattened (Figure 20). The incising was applied to the vessel after its initial drying, if it was smooth/plain, or after the burnishing process if it was burnished most likely using a piece of cane. The incised designs include brackets, scrolls and concentric loops joined by multiple horizontal lines (Figure 20, 21). Figure 21 Figure 20 The Blended Pottery The first time that I saw what I have labeled blended pottery was this past summer when I was working at the Berry site. I was excavating my first feature and was absolutely bursting with anticipation, even going as far as singing a song about it. As a fellow field schooler and I Monahan 18 troweled away in the feature we noticed a dark color becoming more and more prominent. We slowed down and touched the color to see if it was solid or a soil discoloration; it was solid. As we continued to trowel around it we could see that it was a pottery sherd. So we kept troweling. And troweling. And troweling. That’s when we realized that it was a large pottery sherd. We called one of our superiors over who told us to slow down and use a brush so we could get a better look at while it was in situ. Then our superior called over the site supervisor. He was also impressed and said that the sherd wasn’t Burke, the pottery almost exclusively found at the Berry site, but Pisgah. Being as I had only heard the word Pisgah associated with large mountains and local breweries I didn’t know what he meant so I asked him to explain. He said that Pisgah pottery is the pottery found at the Warren Wilson site and that it was probably here because of some contact between the cultures. As soon as he said that I was instantly curious as to how and why the Native Americans that had once lived in the settlement that once existed where my college now stands had traveled to this region where the Spanish conquistadors had also travelled. That sherd turned out not to be exactly Pisgah but it is not exactly Burke either. The sherd that I excavated last summer was only one of many in the area that exhibits a blend of Pisgah and Burke attributes. All of the ceramics that I used in my research, and have come across in literature, that fit my definition of blended pottery exhibit Pisgah series stamping while containing soapstone temper (Figures 22, 23 & 24). Other archaeologists have noticed this in their writings; specifically Dr. Roy S. Dickens, Jr. observed it at the McDowell site (31MC41) when he conducted his analysis of Pisgah pottery and Dr. David G. Moore observed it in the Catawba Valley when he conducted his analysis of the Burke series (1976, 2002). Both Dickens and Monahan 19 Moore concluded that the blended pottery was Pisgah because soapstone temper has been found in Pisgah ceramics. Figure 22 Figure 23 Figure 24 Monahan 20 Despite that there are still many possibilities open for explanations of this blended pottery. Archaeological evidence points to contact and probable trade between Southeastern Native Americans on the coast and those in the interior but the extent, frequency and intent of it has been very hard to determine (Hudson 1976). Hudson has stated that Joara was a border town; not just in one way but three. According to the Juan Pardo documents Joara was on the border of Iroquoian and Catawban speakers and it is geographically on the border between the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Piedmont. Hudson also says that it was the border town between Pisgah/Qualla pottery and Caraway and Dan River pottery (2005). Since Joara seemed to be a prominent town with ties to other communities in the area, some amount of contact between Native Americans in different regions is very probable and there is a high amount of blended pottery found in the Upper Catawba Valley it is possible that this blended pottery is the product of interactions between the Pisgah and Burke cultures. Purpose of Study To analyze the blended pottery found in the Western Piedmont and try to determine if XRF is an accurate tool to explore possible connections between it and other pottery series. Methods and Procedures My sample size consisted of 104 pottery sherds from four different archaeology sites located either in Buncombe or Burke counties, North Carolina. Someone else checked the classifications of all of my samples to ensure accuracy. To ensure accuracy even further as many readings were done on each sample with the XRF as possible. The preferred amount of readings Monahan 21 done one sample was three but some had four done because of their size while others could only have two or one because of theirs. The purpose of multiple readings on each sample isn’t only to increase accuracy but also to ensure that the reading isn’t biased due to the proximity of the temper and reading being taken. Very few readings lasted under forty-five seconds and the only time when these weren’t disregarded is when readings lasting the full sixty seconds couldn’t be taken. Readings lasting under forty-five were always averaged with another reading lasting under forty-five seconds to try and increase accuracy. Sixty seconds is the maximum that the device will take a reading and the most accurate it can be. At the beginning of each day readings of the soil standards, which came with the XRF, were tested for at least forty-five seconds. All of the analysis was performed in the Warren Wilson Archaeology Lab and none of the samples were harmed because EDXRF (energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence) was used. Sampling As stated before my sample size consisted of 104 pottery sherds. All had been excavated by, in some manner, and stored in the Warren Wilson Archaeology Lab. It consisted of twelve Pisgah sherds from the Brunks site (31BN151) and eleven Pisgah pottery sherds from the Warren Wilson site (31BN29). It also consisted of fifteen Burke pottery sherds and nine blended pottery sherds from the Ensley site (31BK468). The majority of my sample consisted of twenty-five Burke sherds, thirty blended sherds, one possible Woodland and one Pisgah sherd all from the Berry site (31BK22). I went about looking for sherds by looking through bags of pottery from features since features tend to have the largest sherds. The twelve sherds from the Brunks site were excavated Monahan 22 in 1981 by Dr. David Moore, seven sherds from the Warren Wilson site were excavated in 1997, one in 1998 and three in 1999 all by the Warren Wilson Field School. All fifteen of the Burke sherds and all eight of the blended sherds from the Ensley site were excavated in 2005 by the Warren Wilson Field School. Five Burke sherds from the Berry site were excavated in 2010, seven in 2009, eleven in 2008 and two in 2007. Three of the blended sherds that were analyzed were excavated from the Berry site in 2010 and twenty-nine were excavated in 2009. The one Pisgah sherd that was found at the Berry site was excavated in 2007. Instrumentation The XRF that was used in analysis is an XLP 730A Serial #24920. This specific model is intended for the detection of lead paint and as such as a sensor on the front which must be engaged for a reading to occur. It detected elements in parts per million (ppm). Bulk sample mode was used for all analysis which is used when the sample is not homogenous like in pottery where temper and different elements of the paste are not equally distributed. This specific XRF detects the elements Molybdenum (Mo), Zirconium (Zr), Strontium (Sr), Rubidium (Rb), Lead (Pb), Selenium (Se), Arsenic (As), Mercury (Hg), Zinc (Zn), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Cobalt (Co), Iron (Fe), Manganese (Mn) and Chromium (Cr). Data Analysis and Findings Each of the readings for one sample were averaged; for example if there were three readings for sherd number fifty-six then the three readings for Iron were averaged together and so on for each element that the XRF detects. Each of the averages for a certain element were taken and put into a chart to see if any trends stood out. None did so each sherd was put in a list by what phase it was and then one element of each phase was put into a chart to see if any trends Monahan 23 could be seen. The chart below is the one of Strontium (Sr), the Y axis represents the reading; P_Sr are the Pisgah samples in blue, B_Sr are the Burke samples in red and B-P_Sr are the blended samples in green (Figure 25). Despite a few outliers Burke and the blended pottery have the same general readings for Strontium. This was the case for several elements. Figure 25 However, it was not entirely conclusive and there multiple occurrences of negative numbers. A new datasheet was compiled in which all negative numbers were converted to zeros along with readings under 5.00 ppm. The occurrence of numbers above 5.00 ppm was taken and a percent was determined for how much of each element was detected and divided into phase (Figure 26). Monahan 24 Element B % Detect Mo 0 Zr 100 Sr 100 Rb 100 Pb 97.4 Se 10.3 As 38.5 Hg 10.3 Zn 100 Cu 84.6 Ni 94.9 Co 64.1 Fe 100 Mn 69.2 Cr 100 B Average 0 313.80 60.1 31.78 16.99 7.54 7.43 17.44 51.24 28.12 96.63 88.57 23462.24 244.78 467.64 P% Detect 8.7 100 100 100 65.2 13 13 13 73.9 34.8 34.8 17.4 100 52.8 65.2 Figure 26 P Average 7.37 361.55 142.82 40.88 19.2 7.74 11.25 18.82 75.7 61.15 95.61 241.02 23608.31 428.94 476.65 B-P % Detect 5 100 100 100 97.4 30.8 48.7 30.8 100 89.7 100 92.3 100 94.9 100 B-P Average 5.26 258.74 96.83 42 15.91 7.85 9.34 18.51 53.29 34.14 130.95 127.39 22887.84 353.02 664.94 “B % Detect” are the percent of Burke sherds that have a reading for that element in vertical column. For instance the 100 to the right of Zr below B % Detect means that 100% of Burke sherds had a reading above 5.00 ppm for Zirconium. The numbers below “B Average”, “P Average” and “B-P Average are the averages for that element represented on the left for all of the Burke, Pisgah or blended sherds. So the 313.80 to the right of the 100 is the average Zirconium reading for all Burke sherds. The point of the percents is to try and detect which elements will be useful in isolating certain elements which can signal similarities/differences between the pottery. Molybdenum will not be useful since very few readings are above 5.00 ppm. Strontium and Zirconium could prove to be useful since 100% of the readings were above the detection base and the numbers vary from phase to phase. Zinc, Chromium, Copper and Nickel could be helpful because the readings are so frequent for Burke and blended but not for Pisgah. Monahan 25 Limitations and Delimiations A weakness is my lack of clay sources for my samples. Having clay from source areas near my sample sites would aid in my analysis of my samples but is not necessary. Without the clay sources I was still able to determine which pottery is similar or different but having a clay source from the area would help in the spatial layout of pottery. Significance of Study My research has explored another possibility of the blended pottery that is apparent in the Western Piedmont other than it being Pisgah. This is also the first time that XRF has been used archaeologically at Warren Wilson College and my research can be used to determine if it will be helpful in the future with other projects. My research has also contributed to the archaeological understanding of Western North Carolina’s past. References Cited Adams, Robert M. Monahan 26 1992 Anthropological Perspectives on Ancient Trade. Current Anthropology 33(1): 141-160. Bower, Nathan W., with Steve Faciszewski, Stephen Renwick and Stewart Peckham 1986 A Preliminary Analysis of Rio Grande Glazes of the Classic Period Using Scanning Electron Microscopy with X-Ray Fluorescence. Journal of Field Archaeology 13(3): 307-315. Dickens, Roy S., Jr. 1976 Cherokee Prehistory: The Pisgah Phase in the Appalachian Summit Region. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. Druc, Isabelle C. 2004 Ceramic Diversity in Chavin de Huantar, Peru. American Antiquity 15(3):344-363. Hatcher, Helen, with Alexander Kaczmarczyk, Agnès Scherer and Robin P. Symonds 1994 Chemical Classification and Provenance of Some Roman Glazed Ceramics. American Journal of Archaeology 98(3): 431-456. Hudson, Charles 1976: The Southeastern Indians. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. 1994: The Forgotten Centuries: Indians and Europeans in the American South 1521-1704. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. 2005: The Juan Pardo Expeditions: Exploration of the Carolinas and Tennessee, 1566-1568. Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press. Kirch, Patrick V. and Marshall I. Weisler 1996 Interisland and Interarchipelago Transfer of Stone Tools in Prehistoric Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93(4):1381-1386. Kuhn, Robert D. and Martha L. Sempowski 2001 A New Approach to Dating the League of the Iroquois. American Antiquity 66(2):301314. Moore, David G. 2002 Catawba Valley Mississippian. Tuscaloosa and London: University of Alabama Press. Renfrew, Colin and Paul Bahn 2000 Archaeology. New York, New York: Thames and Hudson Inc. Monahan 27 Shackley, M. Steven 1988 Sources of Archaeological Obsidian in the Southwest: An Archaeological, Petrological, And Geochemical Study. American Antiquity 53(4):752-772. Appendixes Appendix A: List of Figures 1. The Juan Pardo Expedition 2. Distribution of Pisgah sites (Dickens 1976) 3. 98-0349-418 4. Pisgah Rectilinear Design A – narrow (Dickens 1976) 5. Pisgah Rectilinear Design B – 2nd Variety (Dickens 1976) 6. Pisgah Rectilinear Design B – 3rd Variety (Dickens 1976) 7. 97-993-271 8. Pisgah Rectilinear Design B – 1st Variety (Dickens 1976) 9. Pisgah Rectilinear Design C (Dickens 1976) 10. Pisgah Curvilinear Design A (Dickens 1976) 11. Pisgah Curvilinear Design B (Dickens 1976) 12. 2332-311 13. 99-0349-66 14. 2332-93 15. 052-446 16. Distribution of Burke phase pottery 17. 026-3088 Monahan 28 18. 026-1883 19. 004-63 20. 056-964/14 21. 056-964/8, 056-964/10, 056/964/11 22. 026-3073 23. 052-432 24. 052-813 25. Chart of readings of Strontium divided my phase 26. Table of percent of elements and averages by phase Appendix B: Averaged Data Sample # Mo Mo Error Zr Zr Error Sr Sr Error Rb Rb Error Pb Pb Error 1 < LOD 5.44 529.71 20.12 209.62 10.88 33.14 5.03 20.02 12.57 2 < LOD 3.82 182.93 11.46 106.79 7.33 45.17 5.17 < LOD 3 < LOD 4.75 280.86 15.56 119.74 8.71 22.87 4.52 4 < LOD 3.98 330.66 13.47 132.07 7.35 41.52 4.54 < LOD 12.73 5 < LOD 4.89 293.21 16.04 146.84 9.61 20.41 4.41 < LOD 16.17 6 6.21 3.8 297.03 14.5 149.27 8.73 57.84 5.89 < LOD 13.82 7 < LOD 4.16 325.11 13.98 106.79 7.02 46.51 5 < LOD 13.31 13.67 24.37 13.62 Monahan 29 8 < LOD 3.85 323.93 13.58 120.74 7.2 50.98 5.05 9 < LOD 3.77 276.78 12.31 129.99 7.2 33.19 4.12 < LOD 10 < LOD 4.37 301.8 14.09 133.92 8.04 49.88 11 < LOD 8.1 364.13 27.74 148.28 15.35 41.92 9.64 < LOD 12 < LOD 6.06 392.73 20.75 163.39 6.56 19.01 17.37 13 8.52 4.64 387.3 17.9 32 5.07 21.18 14.11 14 < LOD 4.69 391.46 16.26 150.71 8.71 35.9 4.81 17.41 13.11 15 < LOD 4.62 442.47 16.37 148.76 8.26 31.04 4.36 22.62 10.31 16 < LOD 4.17 329.83 13.96 93.91 6.61 62.4 5.65 14.84 11.53 4.6 < LOD 511.12 17.1 131.68 7.67 48.09 5.06 12.91 < LOD 7.75 4.41 < LOD 17 11.5 42.37 222.47 11.37 9.1 12.56 26.47 12.22 24.16 19 < LOD 4.92 430.41 16.91 115.6 20 < LOD 4.2 291.62 14 212.09 9.81 62.35 5.8 21 < LOD 5.18 544.7 18.89 191.89 9.71 32.88 4.67 16.77 11.52 22 < LOD 4.86 470.22 17.62 139.33 8.43 40.02 5.01 24.18 12.59 23 4.9 < LOD 355.58 16.55 144.45 9.04 31.57 4.88 15.16 < LOD 24 3.63 < LOD 255.92 11.82 61.78 5.25 37.94 4.38 19.04 9.15 25 3.98 < LOD 225.18 12.06 59.26 5.56 36.15 4.64 17.29 9.82 26 3.99 < LOD 235.63 11.91 65.37 5.63 36.62 4.51 15.04 9.31 27 3.74 < LOD 237.34 11.56 54.81 5.06 32.27 4.16 12.68 < LOD 28 5.11 2.82 259.93 12.27 70.17 5.7 35.45 4.39 15.98 29 4.24 < LOD 243.44 13.08 102.08 7.31 73.9 6.49 20.36 10.67 30 4.69 < LOD 329.4 15.9 151.66 9.21 75.8 6.9 21.74 11.78 31 4.14 < LOD 274.71 13.78 155.49 8.71 48.16 5.33 16.32 10.06 249.73 13.88 144.94 8.86 47.33 5.56 18 10.57 32 4.5 3.17 27.9 5.34 15.94 17.79 13.99 9.81 9.55 Monahan 30 33 3.94 < LOD 252.05 12.8 145.81 8.18 47.48 5.12 19.21 10.12 34 4.13 < LOD 245.82 13.24 165.79 8.99 51.39 5.49 14.04 10.03 35 4.09 < LOD 250.35 12.76 79.87 6.35 40.24 4.87 36 1.13 3.33 263.38 15.37 30.06 5.1 20.18 4.5 41.96 14.06 37 3.57 3.37 263.01 14.92 26.55 4.72 17.83 4.2 44.17 13.93 38 1.03 3.3 270.00 15.3 26.84 4.8 17.82 4.26 54.01 15.04 39 0.91 3.26 453.70 16.9 36.76 4.7 15.09 3.49 10.62 9.42 40 0.53 3.25 410.94 16.59 32.6 4.64 15.86 3.65 6.96 9.42 41 2.3 3.16 392.61 15.7 35.82 4.61 30.01 4.36 16.02 9.71 42 -0.33 2.67 202.19 12.21 58.23 5.87 25.71 4.31 6.01 9.10 43 1.06 2.87 207.09 12.8 55.87 5.98 33.3 4.94 14.31 10.43 44 2.29 3.23 256.86 15.01 97.22 8.02 44.52 5.87 14.16 11.07 45 4.31 4.37 349.61 20.4 45.04 6.96 35.71 6.43 19.05 13.93 46 1.08 2.88 389.88 14.63 60.67 5.34 40.88 4.61 12.21 8.79 47 0.81 2.91 254.16 13.72 74.33 6.6 41.57 5.28 14.87 10.3 48 1.45 2.77 267.38 13.12 83.61 6.49 43.56 5.02 20.04 10.03 49 0.02 2.93 266.73 14.28 105.06 7.78 34.89 4.99 19.28 10.77 50 2.44 2.9 229.26 13.2 108.01 7.74 45.51 5.45 14.74 10.32 51 1.86 3.48 268.59 15.98 32.31 5.4 23.89 4.87 42.33 14.64 52 1.21 2.83 305.46 13.78 75.88 6.17 46.57 5.12 17.73 9.72 53 1.56 3.24 251.51 15.18 114.34 8.73 27.26 4.98 5.01 10.5 54 0.08 2.82 257.76 13.56 101.11 7.37 37.52 4.97 6.47 9.61 55 2.79 3.76 388.27 18.26 29.08 5.02 23.8 4.76 16.23 11.82 56 1.74 3.26 355.50 15.95 34.09 4.82 23.01 4.24 14.13 10.42 16.1 9.7 Monahan 31 57 -1.28 3.16 331.17 15.99 33.08 4.93 20.61 4.22 58 1.45 2.98 306.61 14.43 76.81 6.48 29.34 4.47 9.45 9.48 59 1.42 2.21 108.65 8.59 75.15 54.4 5.24 8.02 8.51 60 1.95 3.73 425.52 18.89 67.76 6.94 47.48 6.08 6.77 10.44 61 2.36 3.18 332.47 15.34 61.52 6.05 16.01 3.73 2.52 63 0.61 3.5 396.96 17.8 47.7 5.84 27.61 4.79 64 2 3.14 418.28 15.92 57.61 5.52 38.72 4.76 65 2.21 3.62 390.35 18.03 44.27 5.78 28.78 4.94 66 -0.85 3.17 399.58 16.53 45.89 5.32 31.69 4.65 5.15 9.18 67 1.06 3.32 414.00 17 46.68 5.42 32.74 4.77 5.83 9.32 68 0.41 3.23 419.44 16.67 45.02 5.21 31.43 4.58 14.54 9.98 69 2.47 2.95 279.5 13.72 49.93 5.4 43.12 5.17 17.42 10.23 70 4.44 < LOD 333.71 16.08 488.34 14.80 41.23 5.15 19.23 10.72 71 4.70 < LOD 262.13 14.28 66.45 6.48 50.27 5.89 19.34 11.04 72 1.64 2.49 180.56 10.81 75.97 6.06 45.86 5 73 4.53 < LOD 280.67 14.14 52.2 5.63 43.67 5.34 15.36 10.02 74 5.41 < LOD 283.62 16.4 47.95 6.31 41.54 6.06 17.59 10.73 75 2.46 2.97 246.25 13.8 89.75 7.28 52.14 5.88 17.17 76 4.50 < LOD 234.51 13.95 103.37 7.96 43.96 5.62 17.90 11.05 77 2.36 2.57 215.24 11.5 73.75 5.92 37.53 4.52 78 2.66 3.10 233.93 13.89 67.08 6.64 33.28 5.09 17.56 11.09 79 0.92 3.43 263.05 16.16 72.17 7.56 39.35 5.99 15.67 80 2.99 3.27 263.40 14.97 89.42 7.57 38.33 5.47 18.43 11.46 81 3.04 3.58 330.07 17.13 75.83 7.43 47.24 6.2 13.45 11.44 5.9 13.27 10.47 9.16 15.39 11.07 8.59 8.88 13.49 11.03 2.9 10.1 8.24 10.8 8.64 12.1 Monahan 32 82 4.4 3.77 299.50 17.17 65.57 7.3 37.59 5.94 21.14 12.81 83 3.77 3.54 361.5 17.03 61.21 6.47 16.21 3.98 16.71 11.19 84 2.47 3.47 318.83 16.67 82.81 7.58 44.68 5.96 18.13 11.78 85 1.2 2.76 299.35 13.25 40.14 4.61 18.81 3.54 17.43 86 1.09 3.29 332.15 16.25 81.08 7.19 49.72 5.97 24.62 11.74 87 2.04 2.9 204.74 12.79 70.1 6.58 35.35 5.06 10.82 10.16 88 2.66 2.72 188.49 11.61 77.2 6.43 31.25 4.53 10.53 89 1.03 2.86 303.91 13.99 84.09 6.56 39.3 4.85 19.89 10.17 90 2.71 2.75 214.90 12.11 71.23 6.18 36.62 4.76 9.72 9.21 91 1.66 2.74 287.58 13.08 75.68 6.01 38.24 4.61 13.65 9.2 92 4.45 2.97 270.02 13.35 63.92 5.88 40.81 4.98 17.81 10.06 93 1.19 3.31 324.17 16.2 69.44 6.78 47.68 5.92 12.6 10.89 94 1.54 3.06 232.91 14.4 155.24 9.73 36.9 5.37 10 10.57 95 2.68 3.02 210.73 13.27 76.88 7.01 31.22 4.94 11.26 10.47 96 0.24 2.7 283.50 13.27 102.01 6.93 39.25 4.73 16.37 97 1.57 2.98 245.14 13.83 86.98 7.19 32.56 4.89 11.62 10.33 98 2.06 3.07 301.91 14.6 65.1 6.16 43.93 5.35 18.39 10.58 99 1.22 2.75 234.65 12.73 77.79 6.46 35.39 4.75 19.93 10.3 100 -0.36 2.52 249.43 12.18 78.21 6.03 42.02 4.73 9.34 8.8 101 1.2 3.55 310.79 17.02 64.18 7.19 36.61 5.82 15.7 12.16 102 0.69 2.69 224.10 12.54 100.75 7.23 41.32 5.05 12.77 9.55 103 -0.36 2.52 229.42 12.02 93.15 6.63 43.11 4.88 12.09 9.16 104 1.89 2.71 216.87 12.14 68.18 6.04 36.83 4.76 16.33 9.8 105 -0.31 2.44 267.91 11.81 44.7 4.53 50.51 4.84 22 9.33 9.42 9.6 9.6 Monahan 33 106 3.25 Sample # Se 2.78 289.93 Se Error As 12.99 As Error 61.16 5.44 59.34 Hg Error Zn Hg 5.47 20.58 Zn Error Cu 9.62 Cu Error 1 < LOD 8.47 < LOD 11.81 < LOD 19.65 < LOD 28.73 < LOD 55.63 2 < LOD 7.65 < LOD 10.13 < LOD 17.5 90.31 22.37 < LOD 48.99 3 < LOD 8.46 < LOD 11.77 < LOD 20.06 181.27 31.75 < LOD 55.93 4 < LOD 6.93 < LOD 9.19 < LOD 5 < LOD 8.87 < LOD 12.01 < LOD 20.85 < LOD 33.35 < LOD 56.65 6 < LOD 8.05 < LOD 10.22 < LOD 18.57 < LOD 29.85 < LOD 50.97 7 < LOD 7.03 < LOD 9.76 < LOD 17.3 139.64 22.99 < LOD 46.85 8 < LOD 6.69 < LOD 9.78 < LOD 16.95 69.03 19.64 < LOD 43.24 9 < LOD 7.05 < LOD 9.02 < LOD 15.85 57.59 18.37 10 < LOD 7.65 < LOD 10.55 < LOD 17.49 55.88 20.72 < LOD 49.25 11 < LOD 14.34 < LOD 18.01 < LOD 30.99 62.03 49.14 < LOD 86.86 12 < LOD 9.94 < LOD 13.76 < LOD 23.49 < LOD 39.12 13 < LOD 8.3 < LOD 11.53 < LOD 20.12 < LOD 14 < LOD 7.87 < LOD 10.89 < LOD 18.07 115.43 24.42 15 < LOD 8.08 < LOD 10.29 < LOD 17.49 42.63 19.74 < LOD 48.41 16 < LOD 7.08 < LOD 9.54 < LOD 17.11 < LOD 27.47 < LOD 44.67 17 6.83 < LOD 10.61 6.83 16.26 51.52 18.31 44.79 38.61 49.38 36.27 96.00 26.7 < LOD 16.51 < LOD 104.29 21.71 63.2 56.87 74.41 35.87 54.59 32.02 19 < LOD 8.25 < LOD 10.44 < LOD 18.67 58.9 22.03 57.68 44.17 20 < LOD 7.37 < LOD 10.37 < LOD 17.08 42.3 19.52 < LOD 46.37 Monahan 34 21 < LOD 7.58 < LOD 10.98 < LOD 18.62 49.92 21.05 < LOD 49.93 22 < LOD 7.72 < LOD 10.18 < LOD 18.71 85.04 22.49 < LOD 51.3 23 8.49 < LOD 11.02 24 6.86 < LOD 25 19.59 19.59 46.96 46.96 22.48 58.29 36.29 10.14 < LOD 15.9 < LOD 72.15 19.34 43.05 < LOD 7.76 < LOD 10.49 < LOD 16.93 < LOD 44.85 20.07 48.32 < LOD 26 6.89 < LOD 10.11 < LOD 17.18 < LOD 67.82 20.34 49.57 32.13 27 7.17 < LOD 9.84 < LOD 16.63 < LOD 57.73 19.08 43.26 < LOD 28 7.21 < LOD 10.23 < LOD 16.46 < LOD 91.01 20.82 45.38 < LOD 29 8.2 < LOD 11.46 < LOD 18.73 < LOD 68.64 22.1 52.06 < LOD 30 8.35 < LOD 8.82 < LOD 19.02 < LOD 60.37 22.9 53.76 < LOD 31 7.34 < LOD 10.73 < LOD 18.05 < LOD 40.93 20.3 50.56 < LOD 32 8.22 < LOD 11.52 < LOD 19.02 < LOD 45.83 21.63 53.59 < LOD 33 7.59 < LOD 10.55 < LOD 17.76 < LOD 49.64 19.95 50.14 33.27 34 7.5 < LOD 10.58 < LOD 18.03 < LOD 51.37 20.78 50.19 < LOD 35 7.42 < LOD 10.83 < LOD 17.74 < LOD 43.94 20.2 49.2 < LOD 36 -3.93 5.88 5.88 10.37 -12.73 14.83 123.76 29.34 17.77 42.79 37 -1.24 5.94 1.15 10.02 -22.17 13.74 135.2 28.78 14.92 40.67 38 1.67 6.36 1.57 10.81 -15.44 14.42 127.84 28.98 8.56 41.28 39 -0.63 5.16 6.19 7.17 40 0.04 5.43 5.05 7.13 41 -1.06 5.01 0.11 6.95 -14.57 11.64 5.74 18.49 17.95 32.78 42 -3.47 5.02 4.24 6.88 -14.16 12.35 92.30 23.82 8.73 35.74 43 -0.57 5.5 0.19 7.46 -17.25 12.68 38.07 22.38 26.92 38.02 44 -2.11 5.76 4.51 8.24 -10.78 14.07 58.82 24.93 30.75 40.67 -12.43 12 38.61 20.8 24.06 34.44 -5.18 12.87 38.97 21.68 24.45 36.19 Monahan 35 45 -3.78 7.02 -2.34 9.78 -19.72 17.6 24.15 30.01 28.65 53.93 46 -0.81 4.66 2.74 6.44 -10.48 10.88 28.68 17.97 0.43 29.31 47 -0.4 5.44 5.02 7.7 -8.75 12.86 44.14 21.94 10.78 35.66 48 -3.02 4.84 2.03 7.31 2.65 12.34 44.15 20.07 0.3 31.65 49 -3.21 5.27 3.76 7.97 -0.13 13.48 50.59 22.49 22.97 36.54 50 1.9 5.57 2.71 7.52 -5.92 12.73 43.04 51 -0.04 6.38 2.09 10.61 -12.9 14.88 131.14 29.89 -5.66 40.82 52 -3.04 4.77 4.79 7.25 -4.84 11.86 41.99 19.81 26.26 32.02 53 0.81 6.19 1.51 7.6 -12.38 14.26 31.36 24.37 6.19 40.34 54 4.26 5.73 2.34 6.94 55 1.62 6.41 3.9 56 0.98 5.65 57 -3.51 58 -7.62 12.56 38.1 21.35 36.3 50.2 21.92 -10.28 33.62 8.71 -18.73 14.36 46.45 25.78 36.68 43.38 6.2 7.85 -11.92 12.95 56.72 23.02 5.4 4.05 7.83 -12.66 13.18 61.99 24.08 20.98 38.24 -0.86 5.21 -0.06 6.77 -5.95 12.47 19.11 20.08 14.85 33.93 59 1.28 4.83 4.31 6.32 -6.94 11.04 39.11 18.45 31.82 60 -1.29 5.93 5.86 7.92 -15.9 14.04 25.86 22.43 -8.27 39.35 61 2.08 5.64 3.79 6.81 63 2.69 6.12 5.42 8.3 64 -4.24 4.71 5.9 6.8 65 -0.29 5.97 4.02 66 0.91 5.43 67 -0.29 68 69 -11.76 12.63 0.94 36.1 30.3 8.22 20.43 14.54 35.33 -11.6 13.66 30.65 22.85 38.7 39.28 2.05 12.3 29.8 19.32 10.05 31.64 8.19 -19.63 13.74 53.26 24.71 -16.81 38.73 3.02 6.76 -14.86 12.3 46.98 21.63 25.5 35.31 5.39 8 7.25 -10.88 12.6 26.3 20.76 6.94 34.51 0.47 5.34 2.38 7.28 -9.54 12.39 28.55 20.51 38.83 35.24 -0.09 5.27 -0.11 7.28 -1.84 12.68 49.31 21.36 30.58 34.71 Monahan 36 70 7.64 < LOD 10.89 < LOD 17.91 < LOD 29.26 < LOD 57.46 33.71 71 7.90 < LOD 12.13 < LOD 20.37 < LOD 34.20 19.68 54.07 < LOD 72 0.72 4.91 0.71 5.88 -14.22 11.04 60.28 20.37 59.49 33.78 73 8.13 < LOD 11.71 7.21 18.73 < LOD 48.36 22.07 54.65 < LOD 74 9.63 < LOD 15.29 11.09 23.13 < LOD 50.52 26.46 64.74 < LOD 75 4.92 6.65 7.65 -2.28 12.74 46.69 22.87 33.51 36.58 76 8.40 < LOD 20.70 < LOD 58.18 23.53 55.65 < LOD 5.79 12.14 < LOD 77 -0.99 4.67 1.25 6.25 -8.49 11.24 180.1 23.77 15.92 30.65 78 0.65 5.77 0.81 7.96 -9.51 13.48 54.28 23.67 9.46 38.07 79 -1.61 6.31 3.28 8.93 -11.65 80 -1.05 5.79 2 8.28 -15.72 13.64 46.77 24.21 81 -0.42 6.13 5.86 8.62 2.39 15.11 41.82 24.61 82 -3.59 6.21 3.69 9.46 -18.2 15.36 53.85 27.68 -0.33 44.84 83 0.74 5.94 4.63 8.32 -3.97 14.07 47.8 23.85 47.95 39.84 84 0.7 6.16 2.44 8.56 -15.2 14.12 34.04 24.18 3.93 40.07 85 -0.83 4.81 5.02 7.07 -11.08 11.22 33.93 19.04 31.36 31.84 86 -4.59 5.37 4.41 8.69 -11.79 13.55 45.81 23.65 16.23 38.36 87 0.08 5.6 5.52 7.66 -3.04 13.4 45.21 22.57 22.94 37.52 88 3.5 5.5 -0.28 6.78 -16.13 11.8 51.73 21.44 22.69 35.54 89 0.97 5.2 -0.38 7.22 1.51 12.4 52.77 20.69 38.34 33.57 90 -2.59 4.94 5.42 6.99 3.07 12.58 51.08 20.73 1.83 32.45 91 -0.52 4.85 5.44 6.91 -1.39 11.68 46.63 19.59 48.98 32.42 92 0.06 5.17 0.28 7.18 93 1.33 5.96 2.6 7.9 -11.44 15.3 35.58 26.08 11.9 38.27 20.46 -20.46 13.21 32.61 23.26 39.17 45.1 16.35 39.78 4.33 54.99 39.6 35 10.6 38.82 Monahan 37 94 1.76 5.99 2.8 7.7 -10.16 13.64 40.48 23.25 23.17 38.88 95 1.37 5.87 5.54 7.88 -9.16 13.56 40.63 23.17 36.54 39.31 96 -0.88 4.91 2.3 6.99 -4.47 11.74 69.3 20.79 31.17 32.28 97 3.27 5.89 7.15 7.83 -11.1 13.08 64.89 23.46 9.05 36.94 98 -2.35 5.24 3.32 7.77 -9.43 12.71 39.13 21.74 99 -0.42 5.16 -2.04 7.21 -3.9 12.39 43.1 20.74 24.3 34.11 100 2.86 5.03 3.38 6.45 -8.58 11.12 32.7 18.52 12.11 30.22 101 -1.25 6.43 -1.11 8.58 -4.32 15.93 53.5 27.38 36.85 45.95 102 -3.64 4.84 1.69 6.95 -8.07 12.14 43.54 20.74 19.16 33.94 103 2.07 5.05 2.73 6.67 -11.2 11.21 40.9 19.42 39.6 32.45 104 -2.45 4.91 3.78 7.26 -8.71 12.02 59.3 21.23 11.02 33.24 105 0.99 4.65 5.28 6.93 -0.33 10.9 68.21 18.89 25.61 28.99 106 -0.55 4.73 1.54 6.93 -11.37 10.97 22.59 17.89 24.01 30.34 Sample # Ni Ni Error Co Co Error Fe Fe Error Mn 14.97 Mn Error Cr 35.7 Cr Error 1 < LOD 77.18 < LOD 193.72 15107.34 367.88 364.27 194.77 1044.13 2 < LOD 70.98 < LOD 233.51 26940.08 453.91 549.84 198.58 < LOD 290.26 3 < LOD 81.28 < LOD 249.10 23225.41 474.45 < LOD 300.34 < LOD 328.65 4 < LOD 59.15 < LOD 166.68 5 < LOD 83.49 < LOD 272.13 29062.31 531.76 < LOD 311.07 < LOD 336.36 6 < LOD 76.24 < LOD 256.65 31335.11 495.97 < LOD 293.04 < LOD 312.67 7 < LOD 62.24 < LOD 199.53 20869.79 381.43 287.62 198.65 8 < LOD 67.67 < LOD 204.36 23560.74 392.48 < LOD 241.91 < LOD 16095.6 319.22 453.15 146.26 240 257.83 199.59 340.97 219.19 253.4 Monahan 38 9 < LOD 60.85 < LOD 182.08 20095.42 351.18 < LOD 215.35 10 < LOD 69.27 < LOD 222.08 25106.65 431.96 580.33 191.53 < LOD 281.44 11 < LOD 122.71 < LOD 396.85 24426.78 769.43 569.81 417.04 < LOD 507.86 12 < LOD 90.42 < LOD 279.57 23035.74 536.89 < LOD 326.72 < LOD 330.04 13 105.46 75.43 < LOD 238.78 23523.63 464.8 293.9 264.49 621.09 234.25 14 116.7 52.29 < LOD 214.7 22065.28 414.8 328.78 235.37 645.6 213.46 15 92.55 50.65 148.56 24715.84 418.62 < LOD 266.35 697.26 212.17 212.33 24525.49 411.82 < LOD 253.65 284.66 216.49 16 246.15 < LOD 64.88 < LOD 17 65.52 < LOD 19 92.96 207.42 < LOD 321.49 200.63 23708.01 402.96 379.5 173.73 259.25 < LOD 68.1 < LOD 267.11 34241.21 518.24 < LOD 310.65 629.41 235.43 20 < LOD 67.56 < LOD 195.59 19635.91 375.33 < LOD 230.06 284.88 227.39 21 95.78 51.34 < LOD 213.7 21993.72 411.58 428.32 182.29 485.53 204.68 22 < LOD 63.92 < LOD 180.1 15585.56 349.54 < LOD 223.51 308.94 < LOD 23 112.99 55.71 253.3 < LOD 27053.05 488.54 602.71 217.45 597.9 238.11 24 77.32 44.49 192.77 < LOD 21639.72 371.89 224.58 < LOD 455.69 178.97 25 123.06 50.75 205.67 < LOD 21159.9 397.43 243.34 < LOD 422.01 190.84 26 135.97 50 203.49 < LOD 21587.25 387.61 244.58 < LOD 526.79 192.66 27 106.38 46.68 195.97 < LOD 21477.2 375.79 232.53 < LOD 622.03 191.67 28 100.3 49.22 211.07 < LOD 24698.23 407.56 250.22 < LOD 449.58 190.37 29 150.43 54.63 217.69 < LOD 21947.13 416.21 416.25 184.41 598.2 213.48 30 134.68 57.96 250.65 < LOD 27049.57 483.53 340.88 198.61 355.16 240.25 31 110.04 51.05 203.89 < LOD 19794.8 387.51 251.31 168.4 613.82 203.1 32 185.78 57.27 212.05 < LOD 19877.31 409.19 310.68 174.7 738.32 223.71 33 228.24 54.37 205.01 < LOD 21556.58 391.04 263.99 169.97 1056.33 225.46 Monahan 39 34 77.92 51.02 208.73 < LOD 21108.37 401.31 429.06 178.31 463.53 199.62 35 231.53 56.11 210.41 < LOD 21507.65 401.09 258.22 < LOD 936.47 224.48 -12.49 191.01 28823.7 555.38 152.03 216.63 276.38 236.61 313.05 231.8 36 90.04 64.94 37 11.71 59.23 102.59 186.22 28203.67 534.64 123.85 209.74 38 33.8 60.96 47.41 186.51 27879.82 538.89 -30.07 215.18 310.28 235.01 39 197.37 58.11 34.49 164.33 29093.7 475.71 227.17 199.95 894.89 241.52 40 249.39 63.06 170.56 171.13 28806.23 488.22 288.47 206.62 737.78 240.09 41 20.35 43.85 -14.33 107.87 12387.38 311.15 263.23 140.45 134.17 153.59 42 242.94 60.12 -16.68 145.37 20961.97 421.21 -33.37 173.09 1050.15 243.69 43 188.52 60.75 148.63 151.42 44 72.22 58.94 52.61 45 46 47 71.18 -39.93 46.03 0.71 54.81 77.83 20173.5 428.16 -21.87 174.61 597.59 220.86 162.84 22015.94 468.26 169.45 197.05 436.21 226.55 17395.0 172.97 8 15475.6 111.73 1 147.17 20665.1 8 502.89 1 7 2 . 6 424.47 227.79 2 322.02 4 4 6 . 2 177.98 139.96 9 420.76 5 0 5 . 6 135.68 177.14 2 Monahan 40 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 49.71 26.6 54.6 54.43 54.49 43.2 63.58 189.65 44.7 -12.04 64.27 115.26 58.91 -64.81 21302.8 137.85 5 20416.7 146.79 3 141.74 194.17 136.62 209.66 195.92 19677.1 8 29306.6 3 21502.6 6 37423.3 6 41074.5 4 397.8 6 1 8 . 4 180.62 168.87 8 421.5 7 4 3 . 2 282.08 184.16 2 407.14 6 3 0 . 4 190.74 174.68 2 575.73 4 1 5 . -102.58 226.75 8 397.04 3 0 7 . 0 355.5 172.86 7 616.41 3 3 2 . 127.27 249.18 1 574.15 656.53 5 0 245.6 7 . Monahan 41 0 7 55 56 57 58 59 60 65.47 126.87 58.76 12.42 61.17 -47.6 52.31 38.37 40.12 -12.89 54.15 84.91 191.45 29643.4 4 26620.0 166.29 1 24982.6 165.26 3 165.52 28820.1 8 14058.1 107.37 7 13166.1 130.65 7 559.59 -105.52 5 6 2 . 8 221.5 2 482.07 6 3 7 . 2 182.28 201.49 8 483 6 6 7 . 5 465.38 212.83 2 479.11 4 1 8 . 9 2.92 192.32 1 310.31 119.22 3 4 3 . 2 133.2 3 368.31 1 8 1 . 9 257.53 165.49 5 Monahan 42 61 63 64 65 66 67 68 535.97 3 1 8 . 6 -161.97 208.38 9 405.68 2 9 5 . 5 40.36 167.97 6 364.86 1 7 7 . 5 137.49 153.53 8 403.2 2 9 4 . 9 63.15 168.97 5 370.15 2 6 9 . 7 -121.36 146.45 8 48.71 65.63 17225.2 134.7 5 384.62 2 6 0 . 9 -28.3 155.96 6 48.7 99.21 17204.2 132.04 3 374.81 54.42 40 52.23 55.97 45.27 23.57 53.13 -20.15 48.65 36.89 34064.2 184.8 9 16799.3 142.09 6 126.67 17950.2 6 15868.4 139.32 6 16321.8 129.17 1 54.04 156.14 3 9 Monahan 43 2 . 1 9 69 70 71 72 73 74 52.13 23.81 149.45 < LOD 257.51 < LOD < LOD 257.20 < LOD 55.9 -21.38 134.9 23299.9 2 34167.3 4 27082.4 4 21425.6 2 55.57 231.44 < LOD 23146.6 5 83.91 259.06 < LOD 22194.8 3 431.91 5 0 6 . 3 -7.08 174.91 7 497.43 4 4 8 . 2 429.65 210.61 0 496.13 3 7 0 . 7 309.06 < LOD 8 391.61 1 3 1 0 . 2 271.29 172.05 9 441.98 5 4 7 . 8 263.59 < LOD 7 501.2 4 302.24 < LOD 5 3 Monahan 44 . 1 6 75 76 77 78 79 80 56.84 125.74 157.84 58.04 229.98 < LOD 43.34 79.54 62.27 62.43 64.69 92.28 61.09 49.81 22554.1 9 21055.1 1 14933.6 113.27 5 151.28 19689.3 3 25487.4 188.4 9 24548.4 169.44 9 445.82 5 6 2 . 835.64 210.74 5 442.66 5 4 4 . 7 730.76 207.86 4 321.23 2 3 7 . 3 -5.91 132.16 6 432.73 7 6 7 . 8 -59.78 175.72 7 540.65 8 1 1 . 9 173.4 227.57 2 488.71 6 6 9 . 7 295.36 209.24 5 Monahan 45 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 561.21 3 8 2 . 6 855.47 253.51 3 576.97 4 4 0 . 9 251.02 241.57 9 491.6 2 6 5 . 4 371.88 211.17 9 500.51 4 4 4 . 2 376.63 216.85 3 390.55 5 7 0 . 8 106.75 162.84 4 59.48 133.9 30789.2 187.05 7 537.07 3 9 9 . 8 428.69 229.08 9 64.31 70.52 21530.3 154.05 5 441.32 61.07 -11.51 68.46 61.89 57.25 93.46 57.5 29.85 49.29 -8.66 29950.3 192.61 2 28702.9 199.81 2 171.3 24961.1 9 24431.3 173.08 6 21567.0 134.66 3 271.99 192.37 9 8 Monahan 46 9 . 2 1 88 89 90 91 92 93 65.91 81.8 49.21 77.35 51.59 100.42 50.53 -0.56 22218.4 146.83 2 19861.0 135.28 3 137.69 142.27 19802.7 2 24499.2 8 51.97 110.77 21340.2 142.73 5 59.18 -23.32 28575.3 179.79 9 419.96 1 5 0 6 . 4 395.64 189.03 5 387.07 5 6 3 . 1 99.96 162.21 4 392.63 4 8 4 . 6 391 174.45 5 412.92 5 5 2 . 1 354.96 178.36 9 407.15 6 9 1 . 6 292.32 177.05 2 523.66 5 402.9 224.76 4 2 Monahan 47 . 2 94 95 96 97 98 58.25 58.19 58.6 92.51 50.36 16.66 58.64 121.72 59.7 47.37 149.49 19273.9 1 21721.0 158.14 4 24653.0 144.54 5 19690.8 147.6 9 31187.6 176.22 5 99 52.51 133.46 138.43 100 46.66 78.63 129.39 19485.8 3 20011.7 428.27 6 8 1 . 0 270.04 187.61 9 452.34 6 7 7 . 8 310.34 169.99 2 418.44 5 0 0 . 164.75 174.57 8 418.98 8 3 3 . 7 376.18 187.44 4 510.02 7 3 7 . 270.67 213.96 7 392.52 4 9 2 . 5 172.2 4 370.5 314.2 352.58 163.65 5 Monahan 48 3 101 102 103 104 105 106 69.04 173.52 54.13 31.02 51.53 67.12 53.05 99.76 46.32 60.96 9.4 40.18 26238.9 192.35 1 140.08 20765.6 3 21887.6 137.32 7 21425.7 142.76 2 19089.6 120.14 1 33.08 101.25 9 4 . 3 2 547.06 5 7 9 . 0 371.98 235.81 1 403.83 1 0 1 9 . 2 375.92 180.49 6 394.33 9 3 4 . 9 346.23 173.67 6 408.42 7 0 7 . 3 674.3 190.01 3 344.08 7 5 5 . 1 55.09 143.84 4 11941.2 288.78 444.17 138.14 144. 121.68 65 Monahan 49