1 Using a gridded global data set to characterize regional hydroclimate in central Chile 2 3 E.M.C. Demaria1, E. Maurer2*, J. Sheffield3, E. Bustos1, D. Poblete1, S. Vicuña1, F. Meza1 4 5 1 Centro de Cambio Global, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile 6 2 Civil Engineering Department, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA 7 3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA 8 9 *Corresponding author, emaurer@engr.scu.edu, 408-554-2178. 10 11 Proposed submission to J. Hydrometeorology 12 13 1 14 Abstract 15 Central Chile is facing dramatic projections of climate change, with a consensus for declining 16 precipitation, negatively affecting hydropower generation and irrigated agriculture. Rising from 17 sea level to 6,000 meters within a distance of 200 kilometers, precipitation characterization is 18 difficult due to a lack of long-term observations, especially at higher elevations. For 19 understanding current mean and extreme conditions and recent hydroclimatological change, as 20 well as to provide a baseline for downscaling climate model projections, a temporally and 21 spatially complete data set of daily meteorology is essential. We use a gridded global daily 22 meteorological data set at 0.25 degree resolution for 1948-2008, and adjust it using monthly 23 precipitation observations interpolated to the same grid using a cokriging method with elevation 24 as covariate. For validation, we compare daily statistics of the adjusted gridded precipitation to 25 station observations. For further validation we drive a hydrology model with the gridded 0.25- 26 degree meteorology and compare stream flow statistics with observed flow. We validate the high 27 elevation precipitation by comparing the simulated snow extent to MODIS images. Results show 28 that the daily meteorology with the adjusted precipitation can accurately capture the statistical 29 properties of extreme events as well as the sequence of wet and dry events, with hydrological 30 model results displaying reasonable agreement for observed flow statistics and snow extent. This 31 demonstrates the successful use of a global gridded data product in a relatively data-sparse 32 region to capture hydroclimatological characteristics and extremes. 33 34 35 2 36 Introduction 37 38 Whether exploring teleconnections for enhancing flood and drought predictability or assessing 39 the potential impacts of climate change on water resources, understanding the response of the 40 land surface hydrology to perturbations in climate is essential. This has inspired the development 41 and assessment of many large scale hydrology models for simulating land-atmosphere 42 interactions over regional and global scales [e.g.,Lawford et al., 2004; Milly and Shmakin, 2002; 43 Nijssen et al., 2001a; Sheffield and Wood, 2007]. 44 45 A prerequisite to regional hydroclimatological analyses is a comprehensive, multi-decadal, 46 spatially and temporally complete data set of observed meteorology, whether for historic 47 simulations or as a baseline for downscaling future climate projections. In response to this need, 48 data sets of daily gridded meteorological observations have been generated, both over 49 continental regions [e.g.,Cosgrove et al., 2003; Maurer et al., 2002] and globally [Adam and 50 Lettenmaier, 2003; Sheffield et al., 2006]. These have benefited from work at coarser time scales 51 [Chen et al., 2002; Daly et al., 1994; Mitchell and Jones, 2005; New et al., 2000; Willmott and 52 Matsuura, 2001], with many products combining multiple sources, such as station observations, 53 remotely sensed images, and model reanalyses. 54 55 While these large-scale gridded products provide opportunities for hydrological simulations for 56 land areas around the globe, they are inevitably limited in their accuracy where the underlying 57 station observation density is low, the station locations are inadequate to represent complex 58 topography, or where the gridded spatial resolution is too large for the region being studied. 3 59 Central Chile is an especially challenging environment for characterizing climate and hydrology 60 since the terrain exhibits dramatic elevation changes over short distances, and the orographic 61 effects this drives produce high spatial heterogeneity in precipitation in particular. In general, the 62 observation station density in South America is inadequate for long-term hydroclimate 63 characterization [de Goncalves et al., 2006]. While some of South America is relatively well 64 represented by global observational datasets [Silva et al., 2007], regions west of the Andes are 65 much less so [Liebmann and Allured, 2005]. 66 67 In this study, we utilize a new high-resolution global daily gridded dataset of temperature and 68 precipitation, adjust it with available local climatological information, and assess its utility for 69 representing river basin hydrology. Recognizing the value in simulating realistic extreme events, 70 we assess the new data product for its ability to produce reasonable daily streamflow statistics. 71 We evaluate the potential to reproduce climate and hydrology in a plausible manner, such that 72 historical statistics are reproduced. 73 74 The principal aim of this study is to produce a gridded representation of the climate and 75 hydrology of central Chile, are demonstrate a methodology for producing a reasonable set of data 76 products that can be used for future studies of regional hydrology or climate. Given these 77 regional results, we assess the potential to export the method to other relatively data-sparse 78 regions, where representative climatological average information is available but long-term daily 79 data are inadequate. The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the study area. In 80 Section 3 we describe the data, the hydrological model and the methodological approach. Results 4 81 of the adjusted data set validation and model simulations are discussed in Section 4. Finally, the 82 main conclusions of the study are presented in Section 5. 83 84 Region 85 86 The focus area of this study is central Chile (Figure 1), encompassing the four major river basins 87 (from north to south, the Rapel, Mataquito, Maule, and Itata Rivers) between latitudes 35.25º S 88 and 37.5º S. The climate is Mediterranean, with 80% of the precipitation falling in the rainy 89 season from May-August [Falvey and Garreaud, 2007]. The terrain is dramatic, rising 90 approximately 6000 meters within a horizontal distance of approximately 200 km, producing 91 sharp gradients in climate [Falvey and Garreaud, 2009]. 92 93 Driven by the terrain, the area exhibits a dramatic climate gradient, with mean precipitation of 94 approximately 500 mm per year at the North end of the study domain, and as much as 3000 mm 95 per year in the high elevations at the Southern end of the domain. It is evident from Figure 1 that 96 the high elevation areas are under-represented by any of the observation stations. 97 98 The region of Central Chile is especially important from a hydroclimatological standpoint, as it 99 contains the largest proportion of irrigated agriculture and reservoir storage of any region in the 100 country and provides water supply for some of Chile's largest cities. A changing climate is 101 evident in recent hydroclimate records [Rubio-Álvarez and McPhee, 2010], and future climate 102 projections for the region indicate the potential for very large impacts [Bradley et al., 2006]. The 103 vulnerability of Central Chile to projected climate change is high, with robust drying trends in 5 104 General Circulation Model (GCM) projections, and a high sensitivity to changing snow melt 105 patterns [Vicuna et al., 2010], who also discuss the challenges in characterizing climate in a 106 Chilean catchment with few precipitation observations, and none at high elevations. 107 108 Methods and data 109 110 Gridded data set development 111 112 We begin with a gridded global (land surface) dataset of daily precipitation and minimum and 113 maximum temperatures at 0.25º spatial resolution (approximately 25 km), prepared following 114 Sheffield et al. [2006]. To summarize, the forcing dataset is based on the NCEP–NCAR 115 reanalysis [Kalnay et al., 1996] for 1948-2008, from which daily maximum and minimum 116 temperature and daily precipitation are obtained at approximately 2º spatial resolution. 117 Reanalysis temperatures are based on observations, though precipitation is a model output and 118 thus exhibits significant biases. 119 120 The reanalysis temperatures are interpolated to a 0.25º spatial resolution, lapsing temperatures by 121 -6.5ºC/km based on the elevation difference between the large reanalysis spatial scale and the 122 elevation in each 0.25º grid cell. Precipitation is interpolated to 0.25º using a product of the 123 Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) [Huffman et al., 2007] following the methods 124 outlined by Sheffield et al. [2006]. To ensure large-scale correspondence between this data set 125 and the observationally-based monthly 0.5º data from the Climate Research Unit [CRU, Mitchell 126 and Jones, 2005], precipitation is scaled so the monthly totals match the CRU monthly values at 6 127 the CRU spatial scale. Maximum and minimum temperatures are also scaled to match the CRU 128 time series, using CRU monthly mean temperature and diurnal temperature range. 129 130 While the incorporation of multiple sources of extensively reviewed data provides an invaluable 131 data product for global and continental scale analyses, as discussed by Mitchell and Jones [2005] 132 ultimately much of the local characterization is traceable to a common network of land surface 133 observations [Peterson et al., 1998], which is highly variable in station density for different 134 regions. For example, for the region of study shown in Figure 1, an average of 3-4 observation 135 stations are included in the CRU precipitation data product, and none are in high-elevation areas. 136 This results in a few low elevation meteorological stations in Chile on the western side of the 137 Andes, and the next observation station to the east is in a more arid area in Argentina. Thus, the 138 resulting precipitation fields in the gridded product for this region showed a spatial gradient 139 opposite to that published by the Dirección General de Aguas [DGA, 1987]. Figure 2a shows the 140 spatial distribution of gridded global total annual precipitation that displays a notable decrease of 141 rainfall with a elevation. Conversely the DGA precipitation map is able to capture the 142 climatological orographic enhancement of precipitation by the Andes (Figure 2b) . The 143 precipitation lapse rates for the latitudinal bands -35.125º S and -36.125º S show a negative 144 gradient of precipitation with elevation in the global gridded data set whereas the DGA 145 precipitation shows a positive gradient for the period 1951-89 (Figures 2c and 2d, respectively). 146 147 Local data from the DGA of Chile, some monthly and some daily, were obtained to characterize 148 better the local climatology. While still biased toward low elevation areas, the stations (Figure 1) 149 do cover a wider range and include altitudes up to 2400 m. These stations were filtered to include 7 150 those that had at least 90% complete monthly records for the 25-year period 1983-2007. The 151 monthly average precipitation for the 25-year period for these 40 DGA stations was interpolated 152 onto the same 0.25º grid using cokriging, with elevation being the covariate. This method of 153 cokriging has been shown to improve kriging interpolation to include orographic effects induced 154 by complex terrain [Diodato and Ceccarelli, 2005; Hevesi et al., 1992]. 155 156 This process produced 12 monthly mean precipitation maps for the region. The same 1983-2007 157 period was extracted from the daily gridded data set, and monthly average values were calculated 158 for each grid cell. Ratios (12, one for each month) of observed climatology divided by the 159 gridded data set average were then calculated for each grid cell. Daily values in the gridded data 160 set were adjusted to create a new set of daily precipitation data, Padj, which matches the 161 interpolated observations produced with cokriging, using a simple ratio: Padj i, j, t Pgrid i, j, t Pobs,mon i, j Pgrid,mon i, j (1) 162 where Pgrid is the original daily gridded 0.25º data at location (i,j), Pobs is the interpolated 163 observed climatology, overbars indicate the 25-year mean, and the subscript “mon” indicates the 164 month from the climatology in which day t falls. 165 166 This same method was applied to a global dataset of daily meteorology in a data sparse region in 167 Central America, resulting in improved characterization of precipitation and land surface 168 hydrology [Maurer et al., 2009]. In addition, this new adjusted data set includes the full 1948- 169 2008 period, despite the fact that local observations are very sparse before 1980. 170 8 171 To validate the adjusted precipitation data set, we computed a set of statistical parameters widely 172 used to describe climate extremes [dos Santos et al., 2011; X. Zhang and Yang, 2004]. 173 Additionally to evaluate the temporal characteristics of rainfall events we computed the wet, dry 174 and transition probabilities. Table 1 shows a description of the statistics used. 175 176 To evaluate if the adjusted precipitation data set was capturing the orographic gradient of 177 precipitation we compared VIC simulated Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) to the MODIS/Terra 178 Snow Cover data set, which is available at 0.05 degree resolution for 8-day periods starting from 179 the year 2000. MODIS snow cover data are based on a snow mapping algorithm that employs a 180 Normalized Difference Snow Index [Hall et al., 2006]. To estimate snow cover from the 181 meteorological data, a hydrological model was employed. 182 183 Hydrologic Model Simulations 184 185 To assess the ability of the daily gridded meteorology developed in this study to capture daily 186 climate features across the watersheds, we simulate the hydrology of river basins in the region to 187 obtain streamflow and snow cover estimates. The hydrologic model used is the Variable 188 Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model [Cherkauer et al., 2003; Liang et al., 1994]. The VIC model is 189 a distributed, physically-based hydrologic model that balances both surface energy and water 190 budgets over a grid mesh. The VIC model uses a “mosaic” scheme that allows a statistical 191 representation of the sub-grid spatial variability in topography, infiltration and vegetation/land 192 cover, an important attribute when simulating hydrology in heterogeneous terrain. The resulting 193 runoff at each grid cell is routed through a defined river system using the algorithm developed by 9 194 Lohmann et al. [1996]. The VIC model has been successfully applied in many settings, from 195 global to river basin scale [e.g.,Maurer et al., 2002; Nijssen et al., 2001b; Sheffield and Wood, 196 2007]. 197 198 For this study, the model was run at a daily time step at a 0.25º resolution (approximately 630 199 km2 per grid cell for the study region). Elevation data for the basin routing are based on the 15- 200 arc-second Hydrosheds dataset [Lehner et al., 2006], derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography 201 Mission (SRTM) at 3 arc-second resolution. Land cover and soil hydraulic properties were based 202 on values from Sheffield and Wood [2007], though specified soil depths and VIC soil parameters 203 were modified during calibration. The river systems contributing to selected points were defined 204 at a 0.25º resolution, following the technique outlined by O’Donnell et al. [1999]. 205 206 Results and Discussion 207 208 The adjusted data set was validated in several ways. First, daily statistics were compared 209 between the adjusted global daily data set and local observations, where available. Second, 210 hydrologic simulation outputs were compared to observations to investigate the plausibility of 211 using the new data set as an observational baseline for studying climate impacts on hydrology. 212 213 Gridded meteorological data development and assessment 214 215 The quality of daily gridded precipitation fields was improved using available monthly observed 216 precipitation. Rain gauge records from DGA were selected using two criteria: stations with 10 217 records of twenty-five years and with no more than 10% missing daily measurements. Based on 218 those two constraints the period 1983-2007 was identified as that with the largest number of 219 reporting stations. From the pool of 70 available stations, 40 stations met the two criteria (Figure 220 1). Except for the Itata river basin, which had two stations located at 1200 and 2400 meters 221 above sea level, most of the selected stations were located in the central part of the region at 222 elevations below 500 meters. Mean precipitation was computed for each month and for each 223 selected station, resulting in 12 mean values for the 25-year climatological period. 224 225 Cokriging was then applied to produce a set of 12 maps of climatological precipitation at 0.25º 226 spatial resolution. A scatter plot between observed and predicted monthly precipitation for July, 227 the middle of the rainy season, is shown in Figure 3. Cokriged monthly totals match 228 observations quite closely for the region with a bias equal to -0.8 % with respect to the observed 229 values and a relative RMSE of 0.50 %. 230 231 Figure 4 shows the adjusted gridded annual precipitation fields and the difference from the 232 original gridded observed data set for the period 1950-2006. It is evident that in the more humid 233 southern mountainous portion of the study area there has been a marked increase in precipitation 234 with the adjustment, incorporating the more detailed information embedded in the rain gauge 235 observations. Differences between original and adjusted gridded precipitation indicates the 236 existence of a band along the Andes where annual precipitation is greater in the adjusted 237 precipitation data set (Figure 4b). 238 11 239 To verify how the adjusted daily precipitation relates to observations, we compared daily rainfall 240 at selected 0.25º grid points with the day-by-day means of three rain gauge stations located in 241 approximately a 50 km diameter circle (Figure 5). Rain gauge stations were selected from the 242 pool of 40 stations used to perform the cokriging interpolation, hence they had record of 25 years 243 with not more than 10% missing values. Selected stations were located, when possible, not more 244 that 50% higher or lower elevations than that of the 0.25º grid cell. Four 0.25º grid points were 245 selected for the comparison. The locations of the four grid points are listed in Table 2. For these 246 four locations, we computed basic statistics, bias, RMSE and correlation coefficient for daily 247 observed (OBS) and daily adjusted gridded precipitation (ADJ) for Austral summer (DJF) and 248 Austral winter (JJA) for the period 1983-2007. Summary statistics are shown in Table 3. The 249 bias is defined as the sum of the differences between ADJ and OBS and the RMSE is equal to 250 the root mean squared error between the ADJ and OBS daily precipitation values. 251 252 Mean daily values are very close for the observed and adjusted datasets for both seasons, which 253 is expected given the adjustment process. The variability of daily precipitation within each 254 season, represented by the standard deviation, also compares relatively well, though the adjusted 255 gridded data show greater variability than the observations during the rainy winter season. A 256 high RMSE and low correlation values indicate that temporal sequencing differs between the two 257 data sets. This is not unexpected, since the daily precipitation in the original 0.25º gridded data 258 was derived from reanalysis, and as such it is a model output that does not incorporate station 259 observations [Kalnay et al., 1996]. Thus, while important characteristics of daily precipitation 260 variability are represented in the 0.25º gridded data, and monthly totals should bear resemblance 12 261 to observations (at least as represented by the underlying monthly data such as CRU), 262 correspondence with observed daily precipitation events is not anticipated. 263 264 With this limitation in mind, we focus on the statistics of daily hydroclimatology, rather than 265 event-based statistics. Especially given the rising interest in characterizing extreme events in the 266 context of a changing climate [IPCC, 2011], the ability of the adjusted daily gridded dataset to 267 characterize extreme statistics is important. We compute a set of statistical variables frequently 268 used to describe climate extremes, using the RClimDex software [X. Zhang and Yang, 2004; 269 Xuebin Zhang et al., 2005]. Additionally we computed the probability of occurrence of wet and 270 dry days and transition probabilities. Figure 6 shows box plots of six statistical parameters listed 271 in Table 1 for the four locations. Extreme precipitation events (R95p) are well captured in the 272 adjusted gridded data set at most locations. The agreement between adjusted total annual 273 precipitation (PRCPTOT) and observations is good with an average bias of -9% from the 274 observed station mean (not shown), although this is constrained by design, as noted above. The 275 Simple Daily Intensity Index (SDII), which is a measure of the mean annual intensity of rainfall, 276 also shows good agreement at the four locations, indicating that the number of rainy days is well 277 represented in the adjusted dataset. The number of days with intensities larger than the 20 mm 278 (R20mm) compares well between observations and adjusted gridded precipitation, though the 279 adjusted gridded data slightly underestimate observations. The maximum consecutive number of 280 dry days and wet days in a year is lower for the adjusted gridded observations compared to 281 observations suggesting the durations of wet and dry events are shorter in the adjusted gridded 282 data set. 283 13 284 Figure 7 shows that the probabilities of a day being wet or dry are comparable between both 285 datasets (panels 7a and 7b). Conversely the adjusted precipitation data shows an average 286 transition probability of a wet day followed by a wet day of 0.21 compared to 0.50 obtained for 287 the observations suggesting that the duration of storm events is shorter in the adjusted gridded 288 dataset. This could partially explain the underestimation of maximum consecutive wet days 289 (CWD) in the adjusted gridded precipitation as well. 290 291 The statistical quantities presented in Figures 6 and 7 were compared statistically using the 292 correlation coefficient and a two-sample unpaired Student’s t-test. These are summarized in 293 Table 4. Statistics linked to high intensity events (R99p and R95p and maximum 1-day 294 precipitation (RX1day) have statistically indistinguishable means for all four locations. The 295 mean annual precipitation and intensity parameters (Prcptot and SDII) show equal means for 296 three out of the four locations. Conversely the parameters, R5mm R20mm, albeit strongly 297 correlated, were found to have statistically different mean values. This phenomenon of a gridded 298 precipitation data produce having lower extreme precipitation values than station observations 299 was also noted in the South American study of Silva et al. [2007] and is consistent with the effect 300 of spatial averaging, i.e., comparing the average of a 630 km2 0.25º grid cell to the smaller, more 301 discrete area represented by the three averaged stations [Yevjevich, 1972]. The statistics related 302 to duration of wet and dry spells showed statistically different population means at all 4 303 locations. 304 305 Hydrologic Model Validation of Adjusted Meteorology 306 14 307 To assess the representation in the new meteorological data set of basin-wide and high elevation 308 areas, the adjusted gridded data developed and assessed in the previous sections were then used 309 to drive the VIC hydrologic model. Since the precipitation was shown to be comparable to 310 observations (where available) in many important respects, another validation of the driving 311 meteorology would be the successful simulation of observed streamflow and snow cover. 312 Records of observed streamflow in the region tend to be incomplete or for short periods, and 313 since most of the rivers are affected by reservoirs and diversions the flows often do not reflect 314 natural streamflow as simulated by the VIC model. For this project, we focused on three sites, 315 which are shown in Figure 1. 316 317 For the site on the Mataquito River, the VIC model was calibrated to monthly stream flows for 318 the period 1990-1999 using the Multi-Objective Complex Evolution (MOCOM-UA) algorithm 319 [Yapo et al., 1998]. The three optimization criteria used in this study were the Nash-Sutcliff 320 model efficiency [Nash and Sutcliffe, 1970] using both flow (NSE) and the logarithm of flow 321 (NSElog), and the bias, expressed as a percent of observed mean flow. This provides a balance 322 between criteria that penalize errors at high flows and others that are less sensitive to a small 323 number of large errors at high flows [Lettenmaier and Wood, 1993]. Figure 8 shows the VIC 324 simulation results for the calibration period and for a validation period of 2000-2007. The flows 325 for both periods generally meet the criteria for “satisfactory” calibration based on the criteria of 326 Moriasi et al. [2007], with a NSE > 0.50 and absolute bias < 25% (the third criterion of Moriasi 327 was not calculated for this experiment). While during the validation period several of the 328 maximum annual flow peaks are overestimated, resulting in a lower NSE score compared to the 15 329 calibration period, the reasonable peaks, low flows, and satisfactory calibration and validation do 330 serve to provide further validation of the driving meteorology as plausible. 331 332 Despite the highly variable precipitation across the study region, we applied the same VIC 333 calibrated parameters from the Mataquito basin to the entire domain and used the VIC model to 334 generate streamflow at the other two gage sites. This avoids the possibility of allowing extensive 335 calibration to hide meteorological data deficiencies. The simulated flows for the period 2000- 336 2007 for each site, and the associated statistics, are in Figures 9 and 10. The simulated flows on 337 average show little bias in both locations. The Claro River NSElog value is low, reflecting the 338 underestimation of low flows and overestimation of peak flows during the simulation period, 339 though the higher NSE value suggests the errors at the high flows are not as systematic. The 340 Loncomillo River displays a general overestimation by VIC of low flows, though both NSE and 341 NSElog are above the “satisfactory” threshold. While these are not demonstrations of the best 342 hydrologic model that could be developed for each basin, or the best that the VIC model could 343 produce (since no calibration was performed for two of the three basins), they do provide some 344 further validation that the driving meteorology appears plausible, and does not appear to show 345 any systematic biases. 346 347 A comparison of four streamflow properties are shown in Figure 11 for the three simulated 348 basins. We calculate the center timing (CT), defined as the day when half the annual (water year) 349 flow volume has passed a given point [Stewart et al., 2005], where the water year runs from 350 April 1 through March 31. CT values lie within the -11 to 17 day window compared to observed 351 values, indicating the snow melting season is reasonably captured by the model (Figure 11a). 16 352 The unpaired Student’s t-test indicates the distributions have equal means at a 5% significance 353 level. The water year volume and the 3-day peak flow are systematically overestimated by VIC 354 simulations, however their means are found to statistically equal with the exception of the Rio 355 Claro 3-day peak flow. Low flows are over and underestimated by VIC simulations but only the 356 Loncomillo River has means that are statistically different (Figure 11d). 357 358 Recognizing the high dependence of this region on snow melt and thus the importance of this 359 process being well represented, we validate the high elevation meteorology of the new data set 360 by comparing VIC simulated SWE to MODIS 8-day global snow coverage for six events 361 between 2002 and 2007. The satellite images were selected in mid August to capture the 362 maximum snow accumulation in the region. Following Maurer et al. [2003] a snow depth of 363 25.4 mm was used as threshold to indicate the presence of snow on the ground. MODIS snow 364 coverage was interpolated to a 0.25º grid using triangle-based cubic interpolation. VIC simulated 365 SWE was averaged to match the MODIS eight-day period. Strong similarities in the spatial 366 extent is found between MODIS and VIC simulated the snow coverage for the period August 367 21-28, 2002 (Figure 12). The average area covered by snow in the six years is 172,320 and 368 167,050 km2 in VIC simulations and MODIS, respectively. This represents a 3% error in the 369 SCA simulated by the VIC model, which is very small. 370 371 Table 5 is a contingency table of relative frequencies of snow/no snow in MODIS and VIC 372 simulated SWE. We include all the pixels for the six selected periods (total 1530). The number 373 of pixels classified as snow or no snow are similar in VIC and MODIS with frequencies of 0.65 374 and 0.24% for no snow and snow classification, respectively. Conversely the occurrence of 17 375 misclassified snow/no snow events is quite low, in the order of 0.06% indicating an excellent 376 agreement between both data sources. 377 378 Conclusions 379 380 In this study an adjusted gridded daily precipitation data set is developed for Central Chile for 381 the period 1948-2008. Rain gauge data are used to correct the inaccuracies in the representation 382 of orographic distribution of precipitation existent in the available global gridded data set. 383 Adjusted gridded data are validated using station observations and hydrological model 384 simulations. 385 386 In data-sparse regions, a simple cokriging method that incorporates topographic elevation as 387 covariate can be successfully used to improve the spatial representation of gridded precipitation 388 in areas with complex terrain. A month-to-month adjusting can effectively remove biases in 389 precipitation values hailing from few or nonexistent rain gauge observations. 390 391 The adjusted gridded precipitation is able to capture precipitation enhancement due to orography 392 in the region with a good representation of annual totals and precipitation intensity. However the 393 duration of storm events is slightly shorter than observed perhaps as a result of comparing a 630 394 km2 grid cell to the smaller, more discrete, areal precipitation represented by three averaged rain 395 gauges. The statistics of extreme precipitation events are well captured by the adjusted gridded 396 data set which encourages its use for climate change applications. 397 18 398 Streamflow simulations in three basins realistically capture high and low flows statistical 399 properties indicating that the driving meteorology in the adjusted gridded data set is well 400 represented. Simulated SWE closely resembles satellite observations which can be linked to a 401 good depiction of winter rainfall at higher elevations, despite the driving meteorological dataset 402 including no high elevation station observations. 403 404 Based on our results, the adjusted daily gridded precipitation data set is very useful for 405 hydrologic simulations of climate variability and change in Central Chile. However there are two 406 caveats. First, we assume the period 1983-2007 is representative of a longer time period, hence 407 long term variability of precipitation is assumed properly captured. Second, the sensitivity of the 408 results to the number of rain gauges used to obtain plausible adjusted values was not determined. 409 Despite those, the methodology presented in this paper can be implemented in numerous data- 410 sparse basins located in mountainous regions around the globe. 411 412 Acknowledgements 413 This study was funded by CORFO INNOVA grant to the Centro de Cambio Global and the 414 Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Ambiental at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de 415 Chile. A Fulbright Visiting Scholars Grant also provided partial support to the second author. 416 19 417 References 418 Adam, J. C., and D. P. Lettenmaier (2003), Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for 419 420 systematic bias, J. Geophys Res., 108(D9), 1-14. Bradley, R. S., M. Vuille, H. F. Diaz, and W. Vergara (2006), Threats to Water Supplies in the 421 422 Tropical Andes, Science, 312(5781), 1755-1756. Chen, M., P. Xie, J. E. Janowiak, and P. A. Arkin (2002), Global Land Precipitation: A 50-yr 423 424 Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations, J. Hydrometeorology, 3(3), 249-266. Cherkauer, K. A., L. C. Bowling, and D. P. Lettenmaier (2003), Variable infiltration capacity 425 cold land process model updates, Global Plan. Change, 38, 151-159. 426 Cosgrove, B. A., D. Lohmann, K. E. Mitchell, P. R. Houser, E. F. Wood, J. C. Schaake, A. 427 Robock, C. Marshall, J. Sheffield, Q. Duan, L. Luo, R. W. Higgins, R. T. Pinker, J. D. 428 Tarpley, and J. Meng (2003), Real-time and retrospective forcing in the North American 429 Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) project, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D22), 8842. 430 Daly, C., R. P. Neilson, and D. L. Phillips (1994), A statistical-topographic model for mapping 431 climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 33, 432 140-158. 433 de Goncalves, L. G. G., W. J. Shuttleworth, B. Nijssen, E. J. Burke, J. A. Marengo, S. C. Chou, 434 P. Houser, and D. L. Toll (2006), Evaluation of model-derived and remotely sensed 435 precipitation products for continental South America, J. Geophys. Res., 111(D16), D16113. 436 DGA (1987), Balance hidrico de ChileRep., Ministerio de Obras Publicas, Direccion General de 437 Aguas, Santiago, Chile. 20 438 Diodato, N., and M. Ceccarelli (2005), Interpolation processes using multivariate geostatistics 439 for mapping of climatological precipitation mean in the Sannio Mountains (southern Italy), 440 Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 30(3), 259-268. 441 dos Santos, C. A. C., C. M. U. Neale, T. V. R. Rao, and B. B. da Silva (2011), Trends in indices 442 for extremes in daily temperature and precipitation over Utah, USA, Int. J. Climatol., 31(12), 443 1813-1822. 444 Falvey, M., and R. Garreaud (2007), Wintertime Precipitation Episodes in Central Chile: 445 Associated Meteorological Conditions and Orographic Influences, J. Hydrometeorology, 446 8(2), 171-193. 447 Falvey, M., and R. D. Garreaud (2009), Regional cooling in a warming world: Recent 448 temperature trends in the southeast Pacific and along the west coast of subtropical South 449 America (1979&#8211;2006), J. Geophys. Res., 114(D4), D04102. 450 Hall, D. K., G. S. Riggs, and V. V. Salomonson (2006), Updated daily. MODIS/Terra Snow 451 Cover 8-Day L3 Global 0.05deg CMG V005, Digital media, edited, National Snow and Ice 452 Data Center, Boulder, Colorado USA. 453 Hevesi, J. A., J. D. Istok, and A. L. Flint (1992), Precipitation Estimation in Mountainous 454 Terrain Using Multivariate Geostatistics. Part I: Structural Analysis, Journal of Applied 455 Meteorology, 31(7), 661-676. 456 Huffman, G. J., D. T. Bolvin, E. J. Nelkin, D. B. Wolff, R. F. Adler, G. Gu, Y. Hong, K. P. 457 Bowman, and E. F. Stocker (2007), The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis 458 (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales, 459 J. Hydrometeorology, 8(1), 38-55. 21 460 IPCC (2011), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Managing the 461 Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, Summary for 462 Policymakers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, 463 NY, USA. 464 Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, W. Collins, D. Deaven, L. Gandin, M. Iredell, S. Saha, G. 465 White, J. Woollen, Y. Zhu, A. Leetmaa, and B. Reynolds (1996), The NCEP/NCAR 40-year 466 reanalysis project, Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 77(3), 437-472. 467 Lawford, R. G., R. Stewart, J. Roads, H. J. Isemer, M. Manton, J. Marengo, T. Yasunari, S. 468 Benedict, T. Koike, and S. Williams (2004), Advancing Global-and Continental-Scale 469 Hydrometeorology: Contributions of GEWEX Hydrometeorology Panel, Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 470 85(12), 1917-1930. 471 Lehner, B., K. Verdin, and A. Jarvis (2006), HydroSHEDS Technical DocumentationRep., 472 473 [http://hydrosheds.cr.usgs.gov] pp, Washington, DC. . Lettenmaier, D. P., and E. F. Wood (1993), Hydrologic Forecasting, in Handbook of Hydrology, 474 edited by D. R. Maidment, pp. 26.21-26.30, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY, USA. 475 Liang, X., D. P. Lettenmaier, E. Wood, and S. J. Burges (1994), A simple hydrologically based 476 model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models, J. Geophys 477 Res., 99(D7), 14415-14428. 478 Liebmann, B., and D. Allured (2005), Daily Precipitation Grids for South America, Bull. Am. 479 480 Met. Soc., 86(11), 1567-1570. Lohmann, D., R. Nolte-Holube, and E. Raschke (1996), A large-scale horizontal routing model 481 to be coupled to land surface parameterization schemes, Tellus, 48A, 708-721. 22 482 Maurer, E. P., J. C. Adam, and A. W. Wood (2009), Climate model based consensus on the 483 hydrologic impacts of climate change to the Rio Lempa basin of Central America, Hydrol. 484 Earth System Sci., 13(2), 183-194. 485 Maurer, E. P., J. D. Rhoads, R. O. Dubayah, and D. P. Lettenmaier (2003), Evaluation of the 486 snow-covered area data product from MODIS, Hydrol. Processes, 17(1), 59-71. 487 Maurer, E. P., A. W. Wood, J. C. Adam, D. P. Lettenmaier, and B. Nijssen (2002), A long-term 488 hydrologically-based data set of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United 489 States, J. Climate, 15(22), 3237-3251. 490 Milly, P. C. D., and A. B. Shmakin (2002), Global Modeling of Land Water and Energy 491 Balances. Part I: The Land Dynamics (LaD) Model, J. Hydrometeorology, 3(3), 283-299. 492 Mitchell, T. D., and P. D. Jones (2005), An improved method of constructing a database of 493 monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids, Int. J. Climatol., 25(6), 494 693-712. 495 Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. V. Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith 496 (2007), Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed 497 simulations, Trans. of ASABE, 50(3), 885-900. 498 Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe (1970), River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I -- 499 A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290. 500 New, M. G., M. Hulme, and P. D. Jones (2000), Representing twentieth-century space-time 501 climate variability. Part II: development of 1961-90 monthly grids of terrestrial surface 502 climate, J. Climate, 12, 829-856. 503 Nijssen, B., R. Schnur, and D. P. Lettenmaier (2001a), Global retrospective estimation of soil 504 moisture using the VIC land surface model, 1980-1993, J. Climate, 14(8), 1790-1808. 23 505 Nijssen, B., G. M. O'Donnell, D. P. Lettenmaier, D. Lohmann, and E. F. Wood (2001b), 506 Predicting the discharge of global rivers, J. Climate, 14, 1790-1808. 507 O'Donnell, G., B. Nijssen, and D. P. Lettenmaier (1999), A simple algorithm for generating 508 streamflow networks for grid-based, macroscale hydrological models, Hydrol. Processes, 509 13(8), 1269-1275. 510 Peterson, T. C., R. Vose, R. Schmoyer, and V. Razuvaëv (1998), Global historical climatology 511 network (GHCN) quality control of monthly temperature data, Int. J. Climatol., 18(11), 512 1169-1179. 513 Rubio-Álvarez, E., and J. McPhee (2010), Patterns of spatial and temporal variability in 514 streamflow records in south central Chile in the period 1952–2003, Water Resour. Res., 46, 515 W05514, doi:05510.01029/02009WR007982. 516 Sheffield, J., and E. F. Wood (2007), Characteristics of global and regional drought, 517 1950&#8211;2000: Analysis of soil moisture data from off-line simulation of the terrestrial 518 hydrologic cycle, J. Geophys. Res., 112(D17), D17115. 519 Sheffield, J., G. Goteti, and E. F. Wood (2006), Development of a 50-yr high-resolution global 520 521 dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling, J. Climate, 19(13), 3088-3111. Silva, V. B. S., V. E. Kousky, W. Shi, and R. W. Higgins (2007), An Improved Gridded 522 523 Historical Daily Precipitation Analysis for Brazil, J. Hydrometeorology, 8(4), 847-861. Stewart, I. T., D. R. Cayan, and M. D. Dettinger (2005), Changes toward earlier streamflow 524 525 timing across western North America, J. Climate, 18(8), 1136-1155. Vicuna, S., R. D. Garreaud, and J. McPhee (2010), Climate change impacts on the hydrology of 526 a snowmelt driven basin in semiarid Chile, Climatic Change, (in press). 24 527 Willmott, C. J., and K. Matsuura (2001), Terrestrial air temperature and precipitation: monthly 528 and annual time series (1950–1999) (Version 1.02)Rep., Center for Climatic Research, 529 University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. 530 Yapo, P. O., H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian (1998), Multi-objective global optimization for 531 532 hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 204, 83-97. Yevjevich, V. (1972), Probability and Statistics in Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Ft. 533 534 Collins, CO, USA. Zhang, X., and F. Yang (2004), RClimDex (1.0) User GuideRep., Climate Research Branch, 535 Environment Canada, Downsview, Ontario, Canada. 536 Zhang, X., E. Aguilar, S. Sensoy, H. Melkonyan, U. Tagiyeva, N. Ahmed, N. Kutaladze, F. 537 Rahimzadeh, A. Taghipour, T. H. Hantosh, P. Albert, M. Semawi, M. Karam Ali, M. H. Said 538 Al-Shabibi, Z. Al-Oulan, T. Zatari, I. Al Dean Khelet, S. Hamoud, R. Sagir, M. Demircan, 539 M. Eken, M. Adiguzel, L. Alexander, T. C. Peterson, and T. Wallis (2005), Trends in Middle 540 East climate extreme indices from 1950 to 2003, J. Geophys. Res., 110(D22), D22104. 541 542 543 25 544 Table 1 - List of statistical quantities and descriptions. Name Description R95p Annual total precipitation when rainfall > 95th prctile R99p Annual total precipitation when rainfall > 99th prctile PRCPTOT Annual total precipitation in wet days (RR >=1mm) CWD Consecutive wet days: largest number of consecutive wet days with RR >=1mm CDD Consecutive dry days: largest number of consecutive dry days with RR <=1mm SDII Simple daily intensity index: mean annual intensity for RR > = 1 mm R5mm Annual count of days with Precipitation >= 5 mm R20mm Annual count of days with Precipitation >= 20 mm RX1d Maximum 1 day precipitation in the year RX5d Maximum 5 days precipitation in the year PW Probability of Wet days PD Probability of Dry days PWW Probability of a wet day followed by a wet day PDD Probability of a dry day followed by a dry day 545 26 546 Table 2 - Location of adjusted gridded precipitation grid cells used in daily precipitation 547 validation. 0.25º Grid Cell Abbreviation Grid Cell Center Latitude Grid Cell Center Longitude Loc1 -34.375 -70.875 Loc2 -34.875 -71.125 Loc3 -35.875 -71.125 Loc4 -36.125 -71.625 548 549 27 550 551 Table 3 - Daily precipitation statistics for summer (DJF) and winter (JJA) periods, 1983-2007. OBS are 552 observations, ADJ are adjusted gridded meteorology. Summer (DJF) Statistics OBS ADJ OBS Std ADJ Std Mean RMSE Mean Mean (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) Loc1 0.08 0.08 1.21 0.63 0.00 1.37 -0.01 Loc2 0.14 0.11 1.61 0.59 -0.03 1.71 0.02 Loc3 0.64 0.60 5.44 2.29 -0.04 5.88 0.01 Loc4 0.60 0.54 4.38 2.34 -0.07 4.99 -0.01 (mm) Bias Correlation (mm) Winter (JJA) Statistics Loc1 3.80 3.56 10.88 13.96 -0.23 17.16 0.06 Loc2 5.64 4.72 14.17 16.72 -0.92 20.99 0.09 Loc3 13.63 12.58 30.46 37.39 -1.05 46.18 0.08 Loc4 7.24 7.36 14.51 22.08 0.12 25.64 0.06 553 554 555 28 556 557 Table 4 - Correlation coefficients between observed and adjusted daily precipitation statistical parameters. 558 Shaded values indicate the null hypothesis of equal means cannot be rejected at the 5% level based on a t-test. R99p R95p PRCTOT SDII R5mm R20mm CWD CDD RX1d RX5d Loc1 0.10 0.70 0.96 0.76 0.58 0.82 0.37 0.45 0.78 0.61 Loc2 0.40 0.65 0.92 0.65 0.61 0.84 0.43 0.38 0.79 0.53 Loc3 0.18 0.47 0.83 0.53 0.61 0.65 0.25 0.73 0.45 0.48 Loc4 0.31 0.29 0.87 0.57 0.71 0.73 0.00 0.28 0.56 0.37 559 560 29 561 562 Table 5 - Contingency table summarizing the comparisons of MODIS and VIC simulated snow cover. Values 563 are relative frequencies calculated as the total number of occurrences in each category divided by the number 564 of pixels (1530). No Snow Snow Total No Snow 0.65 0.05 0.69 Snow 0.06 0.24 0.31 Total 0.71 0.29 1.0 565 566 30 567 List of Figures 568 569 Figure 1 - Geographic location of the study area in Central Chile. From north to south the basins 570 are: Rapel, Mataquito (Mataquito river at Licanten), Maule (Claro river at Rauquen and 571 Loncomilla river at Bodega) and Itata river basins. Circles indicate the location of DGA rain 572 gauges and stars the location of the three stream gauges used in VIC simulations 573 Figure 2 - Maps of annual precipitation for the period 1951-1980. Source a) gridded global 574 observations and b) DGA. Precipitation lapse rates for latitudinal bands -35.125 S and -36.125 S 575 for c) global gridded precipitation data set and d) DGA data set. 576 Figure 3 - Scatterplots of observed and predicted monthly precipitation for the month of July. 577 Figure 4 - a) Annual adjusted global precipitation for the period 1950-2006 and b) differences 578 between the original global gridded and the adjusted global precipitation data sets. 579 Figure 5 - Location of DGA rain gauge stations and adjusted global precipitation grid points used 580 for validation of daily rainfall. 581 Figure 6 - Boxplots of statistical parameters, green represents observations and purple represents 582 adjusted precipitation for each geographic location. The bottom and top lines represent the 25th 583 and 75th percentiles and the middle line represents the median. Whiskers extend from each end 584 of the box to the adjacent values in the data within 1.5 times the Inter Quartile Range. The Inter 585 Quartile Range is the difference between the third and the first quartile, i.e., 25th and 75th 586 percentiles. Outliers are displayed with a plus sign. 587 Figure 7 - Probabilities of a) wet and b) dry days, and transition probabilities c) and d). Daily 588 observed (black) and adjusted gridded (grey) precipitation for the four selected locations. 31 589 Figure 8 - Observed and Simulated monthly flows for the Mataquito river at Licanten for the 590 calibration period (top panel) and validation period (bottom panel). Summary statistics are 591 shown in each panel. 592 Figure 9 - Monthly observed and simulated flows for the Claro river at Rauquen. 593 Figure 10 - Same as Figure 9 but for Loncomilla river at Bodega. 594 Figure 11 - Statistical properties of observed and VIC simulated streamflows in three basins: 595 Mataquito river, Claro river and Loncomilla river. (a) Center timing, (b) water year volume, (c) 596 3-day peak flows and (d) 7-day low flows. 597 Figure 12 - Comparison of snow coverage for the period August 21-28, 2002. Shaded areas 598 indicate snow coverage. a) MODIS and b) VIC simulated Snow Water Equivalent. 599 32 600 601 Figure 1 - Geographic location of the study area in Central Chile. From north to south the basins are: Rapel, 602 Mataquito (Mataquito river at Licanten), Maule (Claro river at Rauquen and Loncomilla river at Bodega) 603 and Itata river basins. Circles indicate the location of DGA rain gauges and stars the location of the three 604 stream gauges used in VIC simulations 605 33 606 607 Figure 2 - Maps of annual precipitation for the period 1951-1980. Source a) gridded global observations and 608 b) DGA. Precipitation lapse rates for latitudinal bands -35.125 S and -36.125 S for c) global gridded 609 precipitation data set and d) DGA data set. 610 611 612 34 613 614 Figure 3 - Scatterplots of observed and predicted monthly precipitation for the month of July. 615 616 35 617 618 Figure 4 - a) Annual adjusted global precipitation for the period 1950-2006 and b) differences between the 619 original global gridded and the adjusted global precipitation data sets. 620 621 36 622 623 Figure 5 - Location of DGA rain gauge stations and adjusted global precipitation grid points used for 624 validation of daily rainfall. 625 626 37 627 628 Figure 6 - Boxplots of statistical parameters, green represents observations and purple represents adjusted 629 precipitation for each geographic location. The bottom and top lines represent the 25th and 75th percentiles 630 and the middle line represents the median. Whiskers extend from each end of the box to the adjacent values 631 in the data within 1.5 times the Inter Quartile Range. The Inter Quartile Range is the difference between the 632 third and the first quartile, i.e., 25th and 75th percentiles. Outliers are displayed with a plus sign. 633 38 634 635 Figure 7 - Probabilities of a) wet and b) dry days, and transition probabilities c) and d). Daily observed 636 (black) and adjusted gridded (grey) precipitation for the four selected locations. 637 638 39 639 640 Figure 8 - Observed and Simulated monthly flows for the Mataquito river at Licanten for the calibration 641 period (top panel) and validation period (bottom panel). Summary statistics are shown in each panel. 642 643 40 644 645 Figure 9 - Monthly observed and simulated flows for the Claro river at Rauquen. 646 41 647 648 Figure 10 - Same as Figure 9 but for Loncomilla river at Bodega. 649 650 42 651 652 Figure 11 - Statistical properties of observed and VIC simulated stream flows in three basins: Mataquito 653 river, Claro river and Loncomilla river. (a) Center timing, (b) water year volume, (c) 3-day peak flows and 654 (d) 7-day low flows. 655 656 43 657 658 Figure 12 - Comparison of snow coverage for the period August 21-28, 2002. Shaded areas indicate snow 659 coverage. a) MODIS and b) VIC simulated Snow Water Equivalent. 660 44