Contact Lens Spectrum
November 2002
Document #87
References
(p. 29) Observations of Corneal Staining with MPS and Silicone Hydrogel Lenses, by
Desmond Fonn, Dip Optom, MOptom, FAAO
1.
Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Simon K, Chivers D, Edrington TB: Corneal staining
in hydrogel lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 20 - 30.
2.
Soni P, Horner D, Ross J: Ocular response to lens care systems in adolescent soft
contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 70-85.
3.
Cho P, Lui T, Kee C: Soft contact lens care systems and corneal staining in HK
Chinese. Contact Lens & Ant Eye 1998; 21: 47-53.
4.
Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M: Clinical comparison of three polyhexanidepreserved multi-purpose contact lens solutions. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 1997; 20:
23-30.
(p. 41) Multifocal Contact Lenses – The Next Generation, by David W. Hansen, OD,
FAAO
1. Moss HI. Bifocal contact lenses -- A review. Am J Optom Arch, Am Acad Optom
1962; 39:653-668.
2. deCarle J. The deCarle bifocal contact lens. Contacto 1959; 3(1): 5-6.
3. Arner RS. A simplified design for the moss-arner bifocal contact lens. Am J Optom
Arch Am Acad Optom 1965; 43: 464-472
4. Bennett ES, Becherer PD, Shaw RD, Henry VA. Bifocal contact lenses in the l990s.
Contact Lens Forum, April 1990; 33-50.
5. The Near Add-Vantage Bifocal Fitting Guide, Salvatori Ophthalmics, Sarasota,
Florida.
6. McGill EC, Erickson P. The effect of monovision lenses on the near-point range of
single binocular vision. Journal of AOA; 62 (11); 828-831.
7. McGill EC, Erickson P. Sighting dominance and monovision distance binocular
fusional ranges. J Am Optom Assoc; 62 (10): 738-742.
8. Birnbaum MH. An esophoric shift associated with sustained fixation. Am J Optom
Physiol Optics 1985; 62: 732-735.
9. Lebow K., Goldberg J. Characteristics of binocular vision found for presbyopic
patients wearing single vision contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc 1975; 46:1116-1123
10. Schor C, Narayan V. Graphical analysis of prism adaptation, convergence
accommodation, and accommodative convergence. Am J Optom Physiol Optics
1982; 59: 774-784.
11. Stenhouse-Stewart DD. Some observations on a tendency to near point esophoria and
possible contributory factors. Br J Ophthalmol 1945; 29: 37-42
12. Christenson GN, Korth CJ, Marcolivio J. An investigation of the esophoria shift and
its relationship to parameters of the fixation disparity curve. J Behavior Optom 1990;
1: 179-182.
13. McLendon J, Burcham JL, Pheiffer Ch. Presbyopic patterns and single vision contact
lenses II. South J Optom 1968; 10: 7-12.
14. Van Meter WS, Gussler JR, Litteral G. Clinical evaluation of three bifocal contact
lenses. CLAO J 1990 16(3): 203 -207.
15. Josephson JE, Caffery BE, Monovision vs. aspheric bifocal contact lenses: a
crossover study. J Am Optom Assoc; 58(8): 87.
16. Caffery BE, Josephson JE, Rigid bifocal lens correction, Clinical Contact Lens
Practice, Bennett & Weissman, 1993; 42:1-12.
17. Hansen DW, Current concepts of RGP multifocal contact lenses, Practical
Optometry, June 1992; 3(2):70-78.
18. Fitting Guide Lifestyle Hi-Rider, Permeable Technologies, Inc., 1993.
19. Lebow KA, Presbyopic correction: Lifestyle Aspheric Bifocal Contact Lenses,
Optometry Today, Jan& Feb 1994:21.
20. Hammon F. Tips - How to fit multifocal contact lenses, Eyecare Business, Feb.
1994:52.
21. Sheedy JE, Harris MG, Gan CM, Does the presbyopic visual system adapt to contact
lenses? Optometry and Vision Science, American Academy of Optometry; 70(6):482486.
22. Fitting Guide V/X~M bifocal contact lenses by GBF Laboratory, 1992.
23. Hansen DW, How to fit the lifestyle Hi-Rider, Spectrum, Oct. 1993:36-38.
24. Benjaman WJ, Borish IM, Physiology of aging and its influence on the contact lens
prescription. IAOA, Vol 62, #10, 10/91, 743-753.
25. Hansen DW, Articles on fitting RGP multifocals, Spectrum, Feb, Apr, June, August,
Oct, and Dec, 1995.
26. Hansen DW, Articles on fitting RGP multifocals, Spectrum, Feb, Apr, June, August,
Oct, and Dec, 1996.
27. Hansen DW, Articles on fitting RGP multifocals, Spectrum, Feb, Apr, June, August,
1997.