Nottingham City Council How To Complete an Energy Statement Planning Guidance An Energy Statement for the purposes of a planning application need not be a weighty document. There is a small amount of basic key information that is required to ensure that the development is able to meet the target 10% carbon reduction from on-site or decentralised, renewable or low carbon, energy supply. (see Appendix 4 for full definitions) The key information required is: How much CO2 will the development emit annually in operation? Reference to how these emissions have been calculated? Which technology/ies has been chosen to deliver a 10% reduction in annual carbon emissions? How have annual savings from the chosen technology/ies been calculated for this site? The document should be structured with 3 sections (see pro forma) : Section A : An Executive Summary Section B : A cover sheet clearly outlining calculations to ascertain development carbon emissions and 10% target. Section C : A cover sheet clearly outlining the technology selected and how 10% carbon savings will be achieved. Each section should be completed using the proscribed layout given answering all relevant questions. All relevant data must be completed on forms provided, with supplementary material if appropriate. A number of methodologies are used for calculating a building’s future annual energy use and carbon emissions. For the purposes of this Energy Statement you must use the benchmark data for domestic and non-domestic buildings in Appendix 1. If a directly benchmark is not available, use of the nearest equivalent from the list is acceptable. If more recent or applicable data is available from elsewhere, it is acceptable to use this if properly referenced. It should be noted that it is often less expensive to reduce a buildings carbon emissions as far as possible through energy efficiency first; before applying the 10% reduction from renewables. A lower carbon footprint as a starting point will mean you have to spend less on renewable energy technologies. Note all benchmark data must include building fabric energy use and a factor for realistic energy use, under standard occupancy. When completing an energy statement it would also be helpful for monitoring purposes to also provide the amount of generation the renewable energy development / installation is capable of producing (installed capacity) in Megawatts– by the following categories: wind, solar photovoltaics, hydro and biomass. Biomass should be sub-divided into landfill gas, sewage sludge digestion, municipal (and industrial) solid waste combustion, co-firing of biomass with fossil fuels, animal biomass and plant biomass. For more information contact : Development Management City Planning Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG Tel : 0115 8764447 www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/planning e-mail : development.management@nottinghamcity.gov.uk Energy Statement A. Executive Summary 1. Project name: 2. Gross Internal or Treatable Floor Area (GIFA or TFA):_____ m2 (H) 3. Data summary: Required information Annual whole development CO2 emissions (tonnes) 10% target (tonnes) Required information Chosen energy technology Annual CO2 savings from chosen renewable energy technology (tonnes) Total CO2 saved (tonnes) % CO2 saved 3. Notes: (G) (I) Technology 1 Technology 2 (J) (J÷G)x100 Technology 3 B. Development Carbon Emissions 1. Basic Development emissions Building emissions must be calculated from benchmarks. A wide range of benchmarks covering most types of building are available in Appendix 1. Note that the format for calculations is slightly different for domestic and nondomestic buildings. For domestic buildings use table 4 and non domestic uses tables 2 and 3, for mixed use you will need to use all 3 tables. If an exact benchmark match is not available use the nearest equivalent. Only use emissions factors from Appendix 2. Developer calculated or externally sourced benchmarks may only be used if an appropriate or comparable benchmark is unavailable in Appendix 1. These must be listed, with sources referenced. Additional supporting documentation may be requested. Under named building type, you may have only one type eg medium density housing or in the case of a mixed use development, you may have several distinct types including domestic and non-domestic. Different benchmarks are suitable for different types of development. You must calculate emissions from each distinct type of use within your development and add these together using the tables below. Table 1- Summary Calculation Total annual emissions (Tonnes CO2) Total floor area 10% carbon saving required (E1+E2+E3)÷1000 F1+F2+F3 Above x 0.10 (G) (H) (I) 2. Non Domestic buildings Table 2- Non-domestic buildings fossil fuel use Named building type Floor Benchmark Total fossil Area m2 fossil fuel use fuel use kWh/m2/year kWh/year (appendix 1) (A1) (B1) (A1xB1)=C1 Calculations 1 2 3 4 (F1) Total Carbon Emissions – emissions fossil fuels (kg factor CO2) (appendix 2) (D1) (C1xD1) (E1) Table 3-Non-domestic buildings electricity use Named building type Floor area Benchmark Total electricity (m2) electricity use use kWh/year kWh/m2/year (appendix 1) (A2) (B2) (A2xB2)=C2 Calculations 1 2 3 4 (F2) Total Carbon Emissionsemissions Electricity factor (kg CO2) (appendix 2) (D2) (C2XD2) (E2) 2. Domestic buildings Table 4-Domestic buildings carbon emissions Dwelling type used from Floor area Benchmark Dwelling type emissions (kg CO2) benchmarks (m2) emissions (appendix 1) (A3) (B3) (A3x B3) Calculations 1 2 3 (F3) (E3) Total Notes C. Low or Zero Carbon Energy Technologies You, your technology supplier or consultant must calculate the carbon saved from your renewable energy technologies. Additional guidance and evidence requirements on individual technologies is found in Appendix 6 To calculate carbon savings you may use either: The simple tools on the website of the Nottingham Energy Partnership (http://www.nottenergy.com/renewable-energy/tools2 ) for solar water heating, solar electric, wind power (and soon ground source heat pumps.) Calculations provided in the national guidance Appendix 3 ‘Low or Zero Carbon Energy Sources; Strategic Guide’. Another nationally recognised methodology such as SAP2005 calculations. You may wish to ask your technology supplier to do these calculations for you If the carbon calculations or technology is complex, as in the case of CHP systems or multi-component systems such as ground source cooling and heating; you may wish to consider using a consultant. You must submit a sheet detailing your working and results for each unit to be installed. If you are using the NEP online calculators, these can be simply printed off the results screen. You must have considered answers to the technology specific questions that are relevant to your chosen technologies in Appendix 6. You may be questioned on these by planning officers. Results Technology Number of units Carbon saving from technology 1 2 3 Total carbon saving from renewables (tonnes) (J) Appendix 1 Carbon Emissions Benchmarks for Domestic Buildings Suburban medium density housing† Infill medium density housing† Town centre residential tower† Average minimum requirement for UK new housing* - 30.5kg CO2/m2/year - 30.5kg CO2/m2/year - 28.9kg CO2/m2/year - 40kg CO2/m2/year † London Renewables Toolkit 2004 * BRE eco-homes guidance, April 2006 Energy Consumption Benchmarks for Non-Domestic Buildings Compiled by BRE June 2005 Building categories covered by EPBD Categories matching available data Further subdivision within category Delivered energy consumption benchmarks (kWh/m2/yr unless otherwise stated) Floor area basis Bench-mark source Notes Good practice 3 Offices Commercial offices naturally ventilated, cellular Fossil fuel 79 Electricity 33 Treated 1 4 naturally ventilated, open plan 79 54 Treated 1 5 air conditioned standard 97 128 Treated 1 6 air conditioned prestige 114 234 Treated 1 7 8 Insurance Other business services 9 Local government Town Hall Better to use tailored benchmark tool on the Carbon Trust web site. Benchmarks available for each end use (heating, lighting, cooling, etc) Consider as commercial offices, rows 3-6 Consider as commercial offices, rows 3-6 138 84 Gross Internal Area 2 Building categories covered by EPBD Categories matching available data Further subdivision within category Delivered energy consumption benchmarks (kWh/m2/yr unless otherwise stated) Floor area basis Bench-mark source Notes Good practice Fossil fuel Electricity (GIA) 10 11 Civic offices Police stations Head-quarters 138 108 Net lettable 3 Consider as commercial offices, rows 3-6 Acceptable but based on NI data 12 Stations 125 91 Net lettable 3 Acceptable but based on NI data 13 Fire stations 223 64 Gross 3 14 Ambulance stations 350 50 Treated 4 Data old 15 Law courts Magistrates 125 31 Treated 5 Acceptable although some indication that tailoring could be improved 16 County 125 52 Treated 5 17 Crown 139 68 Treated 5 18 Combined County/ Crown 111 57 Treated 5 225 29 Gross 6 7 19 20 Government estate Offices Defence Multi occupancy accommodation 21 Workshops 175 29 Gross 7 22 Motor transport facilities 317 20 Gross 7 23 Stores/ warehouses occupied 187 34 Gross 7 24 Stores/ warehouses unoccupied 54 3 Gross 7 25 Aircraft hangars (heated) 220 23 Gross 7 26 Officers mess 4.4 kWh/ meal 2.5 kWh/ meal Per meal 7 27 Junior mess 2.5 kWh/ meal 1.4 kWh/ meal Per meal 7 28 Prisons High security 18861 7071 Per prisoner 8 29 Other prisons 18861 3736 Per prisoner 8 Universities & former polytechnics: 110 155 Gross 9 30 Education buildings Education Consider as commercial offices, rows 3-6 Acceptable Acceptable Needs updated benchmarks Building categories covered by EPBD Categories matching available data Further subdivision within category Delivered energy consumption benchmarks (kWh/m2/yr unless otherwise stated) Floor area basis Bench-mark source Notes Good practice Fossil fuel Electricity Science Laboratory 31 Lecture room, science 110 113 Gross 9 32 Lecture room, arts 100 67 Gross 9 33 Libraries, air conditioned 173 292 Gross 9 34 Libraries, naturally ventilated 115 46 Gross 9 35 Catering, fast food 438 200 Gross 9 36 Catering, bar/ restaurant 182 137 Gross 9 37 Halls of residence 240 85 Gross 9 38 Self catering/ flats 200 45 Gross 9 39 40 41 Public funded colleges Private colleges Primary 113 22 Gross 10 42 Secondary 108 25 Gross 10 Secondary with swimming pool 142 29 Gross 43 44 45 46 Consider as Universities, rows 30-38. Hospital Other teaching Teaching and specialist Consider as publicly funded schools, rows 41-43. Consider using tool on the Carbon Trust web site. 42 10.5 GJ/ 100m3 heated 11 47 Acute and maternity 52 9 GJ/ 100m3 heated 11 48 Cottage 55 7 GJ/ 100m3 heated 11 49 Long stay 50 6 GJ/ 100m3 heated 11 50 51 Outpatients 247 44 Gross Nursing and Consider as Universities, rows 30-38. Consider using tool on the Carbon Trust web site, which is based on DfES data. Tool does not acknowledge high energy uses – currently all schools grouped together 10 Private schools Hospitals Needs updated benchmarks Need to be revised to account for changes in equipment Consider as health centre & surgery, row 52 12 Building categories covered by EPBD Categories matching available data Further subdivision within category Delivered energy consumption benchmarks (kWh/m2/yr unless otherwise stated) Floor area basis Bench-mark source Notes Good practice Fossil fuel Electricity 174* * residential homes 52 53 Health centre & surgery Hotels and restaurants Hotel & catering 54 Primary health care (GP surgeries and Dentist practices) Boarding house Gross? 22 No benchmarks but could consider as small hotel, row 60 No benchmarks but could consider as university bar/ restaurant, row 36 No benchmarks but could consider as small hotel, row 60 Café 55 Youth hostels 56 No benchmarks but could consider as halls of residence, row 37 Student or nurses accommodation 57 2 Residential care homes 492 59 GIA Sheltered Housing 314 46 GIA Temporary homeless units 408 48 GIA 60 Hotels Small 240 80 Treated 13 61 Holiday 260 80 Treated 13 62 Luxury 300 90 Treated 13 63 64 Motels Public houses 1.5 kWh/m2 per £1k turnover 0.8 kWh/m2 per £1k turnover Gross NB also related to turn-over 14 65 Pub restaurant 2700 kWh/ cover 1300 kWh/ cover Per cover 14 66 Restaurant with bar Fast food restaurant Wine bar 25m swimming pool centre 1100 650 Gross 14 480 820 Gross 14 573 152 Gross 15 70 Leisure pool centre 573 164 Gross 15 71 Local dry sports 158 64 Gross 15 58 59 * total delivered energy, not split into electricity and fossil fuel. Acceptable 2 2 Better to use tailoring tool on www.hospitableclimates.com web site. 67 68 69 Sports facilities Local authority sports centre Consider as holiday hotel, row 61 Old data Consider as pub restaurant, row 65 Better to use tailored benchmark tool on the Carbon Trust web site. Benchmarks available for each end use (heating, lighting, ventilation, etc) Building categories covered by EPBD Categories matching available data Further subdivision within category Delivered energy consumption benchmarks (kWh/m2/yr unless otherwise stated) Floor area basis Bench-mark source Notes Good practice Fossil fuel Electricity 264 96 Gross 15 74 Amusement arcade Bingo halls 203 117 Gross 16 Acceptable although data old 75 Cinemas 515 135 Gross 16 Acceptable although data old 76 Libraries 133 32 GIA 2 Acceptable 77 Museums and art galleries 96 57 GIA 2 78 79 Night clubs Stadia 50 106 Gross 16 80 Theatres 420 180 Gross excluding balcony and circle areas 17 Acceptable although data old Could be analogous to social club based on enclosed, heated area (?), row 81 plus changing room + sports ground changing facility (which includes some pitch lighting) row 85 Old data 81 Social clubs 140 60 Gross 17 Old data 82 Youth centres 145 17 Gross 3 Acceptable but based on NI data 83 84 Other Fitness centre 201 127 Gross 15 85 Sports ground changing facility 141 93 Gross 15 Ice rink 100 167 Gross 15 Depots 283 27 GIA of bldngs centre 72 Combined pool and dry sports centre 73 Other sport & entertainment 86 87 Wholesale & retail trade services Warehouse 88 89 90 91 Stores Warehouse Distribution warehouses Retail 2 Consider as occupied defence stores, row 23 Consider as occupied defence stores, row 23 (?) 103 53 Gross? 18 Bakeries 92 Banks & Building Societies 93 Betting shops Match to another leisure category Acceptable but better to use tailored benchmark tool on the Carbon Trust web site Benchmarks available for each end use (heating, lighting, ventilation, etc) 63 71 Gross 18 No benchmarks; could consider as small food shop (row 99) but special equipment makes analogy weak Acceptable No benchmarks; could consider as high street Building categories covered by EPBD Categories matching available data Further subdivision within category Delivered energy consumption benchmarks (kWh/m2/yr unless otherwise stated) Floor area basis Bench-mark source Notes Good practice Fossil fuel Electricity 94 Banks & Building Societies 63 71 Gross 18 95 Non-food shops 82 224 Sales 16 96 Department stores 194 237 Sales 18 97 150 55 Sales 18 98 High street agencies Super-market 200 915 Sales 18 99 Small food shops 80 400 Sales 18 100 Meat butchers (all electric) 475 Sales 18 101 Frozen food centres 858 Sales 18 102 Off licences (all electric) 475 Sales 18 103 Hairdressing salons Electrical goods rental 281 Sales 18 104 105 Laundries & laundrettes Dry cleaners Book stores (all electric) 622 197 210 Gross Sales 16 18 108 Clothes shops 65 234 Sales 18 109 Shoe shops (all electric) 197 Sales 18 110 Electrical goods retail 172 Sales 18 111 Catalogue stores 37 83 Sales 18 112 DIY stores 149 127 Sales 18 113 Post offices 142 45 Gross 16 114 Repairs not vehicles Vehicle showrooms 106 107 115 agency (row 97) but hours and increased ventilation make analogy weak Acceptable but check for increased cooling use and longer hours Benchmark assumed analogous with small non-food shops, but data old Acceptable but check for increased cooling use and longer hours Data old Acceptable but check for increased cooling use and longer hours Acceptable but old data No benchmarks although could consider as non food shop, row 95 No benchmarks although could consider as high street agency, row 97 Building categories covered by EPBD Categories matching available data Further subdivision within category Delivered energy consumption benchmarks (kWh/m2/yr unless otherwise stated) Floor area basis Bench-mark source Notes Good practice Fossil fuel 116 Other types of energy consuming buildings Communications & transport 117 118 Bus station 119 120 121 Car park Open Gross Enclosed Gross Acceptable although based on limited data Petrol filling Railway undertaking Road haulage 122 123 124 Other 125 126 127 Community centres 125 22 GIA Day centres 203 51 GIA Nurseries 121 17 Gross Hall 129 Holiday centre 130 131 Printing, publishing, photographic processing Vehicle repair 132 Workshop 133 Common areas 134 135 Places of worship 136 Historic buildings 137 Not applicable Industrial No benchmarks; could consider as defence motor transport facility, row 22 Telephone exchange Club house 128 138 Electricity Airport terminal Other rateable Churches 2 2 3 Acceptable but based on NI data No benchmarks; could consider as community centre, row 125 No benchmarks; could consider as holiday hotel, row 61 80 10 Treated 21 Castles, houses, etc Visitor centre Post 1995: <= 5000m2 No benchmarks; could consider as community centre, row 125 Acceptable No benchmarks; could consider as Defence motor transport facilities, row 22 No benchmarks; could consider as Defence workshops, row 21 Generally counted within other definitions where relevant Consider which other building types are analogous Old data Usually one-off, impossible to benchmark 96 - Gross 20 No benchmarks; could consider as non-food shop, row 95 Better to use benchmark tool on the Carbon Trust web site Building categories covered by EPBD Categories matching available data Further subdivision within category Delivered energy consumption benchmarks (kWh/m2/yr unless otherwise stated) Floor area basis Bench-mark source Good practice Fossil fuel 92 Electricity - Gross 20 139 Post 1995: > 5000m2 140 Pre 1995: <= 5000m2 107 - Gross 20 141 Pre 1995: > 5000m2 103 - Gross 20 Sources 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Where not otherwise stated, publications can be found on the Carbon Trust web site ECG019; the Carbon Trust web site ECG087 Jones et al, Energy benchmarks for public sector buildings in Northern Ireland, CIBSE Conf 2000 EEB012 ECG082 ECG019; GPG286 for normalising method ECG075 ECG084 Energy management study in higher education sector, HEFCE 1996 GPG343; the Carbon Trust web site ECG072 ECG057 ECG036; HCIMA Hospitable Climates web site EEB002 ECG078; the Carbon Trust web site Jones & Cheshire, Bulk data for benchmarking non-domestic building energy consumption, CIBSE Conf 1996 EEB011 BMI retail sector energy benchmarking report 7/99 EEB10 ECG081; the Carbon Trust web site EEB008 GIL062 Notes Appendix 2 UK Carbon Dioxide Emission Factors (kgCO2/kWh) 2003 Source- ‘CO2 emission figures for policy analysis’- Christine Pout 26th July 2005 available from www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/co2emissionfigures2001.pdf Same figures also used for SAP and SBEM Energy source Electricity from grid Electricity displaced from grid Mains gas LPG Bottled LPG Heating oil House coal Non-domestic coal Anthracite Manufactured smokeless fuel Dual fuel appliance (mineral and wood) Wood logs Wood pellets in bags Bulk wood pellets Wood chips Heat from boilers – biomass or biogas Heat from boilers – waste combustion Waste heat from power stations Heat from Nottingham DH network* Electricity from Enviroenergy* kgCO2/k Wh 0.422 0.568 0.194 0.234 0.234 0.265 0.291 0.300 0.317 0.392 0.187 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.057 0.018 0.000 0.126 *Nottingham Energy Partnership Calculations. www.nottenergy.com (Figures calculated using proposed SAP 2009 carbon factor for Energy from Waste @ 0.047 kg/kWh) Appendix 3 Low or Zero Carbon Energy Sources : Strategic Guide Office of the Deputy Prime Minister May 2006 http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/br/BR_PDF_PTL_ZEROCARBONfi nal.pdf Appendix 4 Definitions and Glossary of Terms Nottingham City Council Sustainable Energy Planning Requirement Definitions Document Carbon Emissions Carbon is used as a shorthand unit derived from carbon dioxide (1 tonne of CO2 or CO2e is equivalent to 12/44 tonne of carbon). City Council’s Sustainable Energy Planning Requirement That “10% of energy supply (interpreted through carbon emissions) in all new developments over 1,000 square metres be gained on-site and renewably and /or from a decentralised, renewable or low carbon, energy supply” (As adopted by the City Council Executive Board at their meeting on 22 nd May 2007). These are also known as Low or Zero Carbon (LZC) energy sources. Decentralised Energy Supply Energy supply from local renewable and local low-carbon sources (ie on-site and near-site, but not remote off-site); usually on a relatively small scale. Decentralised energy is a broad term used to denote a diverse range of technologies, including micro-renewables, which can locally serve an individual building, development or wider community and includes heating and cooling energy. This includes heat, power and potentially in the future cooling from the City District Heating Scheme. Design and Access Statement A planning requirement for a document that clearly explains the design and access principles and thinking behind a planning application. Energy Statement A technical report; written as a supplement to a Design and Access Statement, clearly showing how a development proposal will meet the City Council’s sustainable energy planning requirement. The Statement should include a clearly written executive summary as well as sections recording the energy demand assessment of the proposal and conclusions/commitments. Energy Supply (the 10% Requirement) For consistency the percentage of energy supply should be interpreted through carbon emissions rather than energy usage and should be related to the development’s baseline CO2 emissions calculated for the Building Regulations Part L. PPS1 Supplement Planning Policy Statement: Planning and Climate Change Supplement to Planning Policy Statement 1 (consultation draft December 2006); Department for Communities and Local Government. Renewable and Low-Carbon Energy/ Low or Zero Carbon (LZC) Renewable energy covers those energy flows that occur naturally and repeatedly in the environment – from the wind, the fall of water, the movement of the oceans, from the sun and also from biomass. Low carbon technologies are those that can help reduce carbon emissions. Renewable energy supplies include, but not exclusively, those from: Liquid, solid or gaseous biomass, and energy crops; This includes, but not exclusively, biogas, biodiesel, bio-ethanol, woodchip and wood pellet Ground source heat pumps (heating) Water sourced heat pumps(heating) Air sourced heat pumps(heating) Hydropower Solar thermal Photovoltaic electricity generation; Wind generation. Geothermal from hot rocks (not likely to be applicable in Nottingham) Solar air collectors (very small energy contribution and difficult to calculate and measure) Fuel cells using hydrogen from renewable sources (not currently commercially available) Eligible Low Carbon energy supplies include; Energy from waste; where waste is non-recyclable biomass Heat from the city district heating network (fuelled by gas CHP and energy from waste) Electricity from the city ESCO (generated from gas CHP and energy from waste) Gas or oil Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Gas or oil Combined Cooling Heat and Power (Trigeneration or CCHP) Ground/water sourced cooling Ground cooling air systems (no experience currently in the UK) Note Carbon savings from the cooling cycle from Air Sourced Heat Pump systems is not a renewable or low carbon energy technology. Substantial New Development Substantial new development (to which the City Council’s 10% requirement applies) is proposed new development with buildings, individually or in aggregate, with a total useful floor area over 1,000 m2. June 2008 Appendix 5 Rules of Thumb for Renewable Sources in Development Scenarios (Source London Renewables Toolkit September 2004) CENTRAL RETAIL BLOCK Scenario – town centre multi-storey retail building not shared with other uses e.g. 3/4 storey department store. Ground sourced heating is likely to be able to provide the highest renewable contribution at least cost, with ground cooling also possible. SMALL RETAIL UNIT Scenario – town centre retail unit in a building with other uses, e.g. offices or flats above. Due to location issues, ground sourced heating may be the only possibility. PRESTIGE OFFICE Scenario – prestige (i.e. high quality cladding, common area fit-out and space specification) central office building; circa 3000m2. Ground sourced heating and cooling (possibly in combination) are likely to provide the least costs renewable contribution. PV cladding could be used to replace an expensive façade. A 10% contribution can be made by a combination of ground sourced heating and cooling at just over 3% of capital cost. Assuming PV cladding is replacing an expensive façade the increase cost on base build for the same proportion of energy demand met could be 1.5% or even less depending on the material being replaced. STANDARD OFFICE Scenario – standard air conditioned office, possibly shared with other uses; circa 3000m2. Biomass heating, if a suitable fuel supply and storage area are available, could be the cheapest option. Ground sourced heating also low cost, addition of ground source cooling cycle will also lower carbon target. A wind turbine could provide a low cost renewable source, if there is space and an adequate wind regime available. A 10% contribution to energy demand can be made by ground sourced heating at less than 2% above base build capital costs. STANDARD INFILL NATURALLY VENTILATED OFFICE Scenario – naturally ventilated office building, possibly shared with other uses; circa 1000m2. Biomass heating, if a suitable fuel supply and storage area are available, or ground sourced heating are the cheapest options. Ground sourced heating can provide a 10% contribution to energy demand at less than 1% above base build capital costs. Addition of ground source cooling cycle for cooled areas, such as server rooms, will also lower carbon target. INDUSTRY Scenario - factory building on an industrial site. A wind turbine, if there is space and an adequate wind regime available, can be the cheapest option, alternatively biomass heating, if a suitable fuel supply and storage area are available, and ground sourced heating can be low cost. Solar water heating could be viable if the particular building use has high hot water demand e.g. for washing. Wind is the least cost option if available, costing just over 1% above base build for 10% of energy demand met, Biomass heating can provide nearly 20% of energy demand at 3% above base build capital costs. Gas CHP should be considered if there is a high year round heat demand. CHP can also be fuelled with steam from process waste combustion; gas from process waste digestion or gasification or biomass. This can also significantly reduce waste disposal cost against escalating landfill tax. CHP can also act as a grid backup/emergency power supply system WAREHOUSING AND DISTRIBUTION Scenario – storage or distribution warehouse on an industrial park. A wind turbine, if there is space and an adequate wind regime available, can be the cheapest option, alternatively ground sourced heating could be used at reasonable cost. Gas CHP should be considered if there is a high year round heat demand. CHP can also be fuelled with steam from process waste combustion; gas from process waste digestion or gasification or biomass. This can also significantly reduce waste disposal cost against escalating landfill tax. CHP can also act as a grid backup/emergency power supply system HOTEL Scenario – luxury hotel in prime location. Ground sourced heating is likely to be the cheapest renewable source with a combination of solar hot water and ground cooling also reasonable. PV cladding, if used to replace an expensive façade could also provide a contribution. Ground sourced heating or biomass CHP can provide at least 10% of energy demand at less than 1.5% above base build capital costs. Solar water heating can provide 5% of energy demand at less than 1% above base build capital costs. CARE HOMES AND SHELTERED HOUSING Scenario – 40 bedsit flats plus resident care, bathrooms etc. Biomass heating, if a suitable fuel supply and storage area are available, could be the cheapest option, with ground sourced heating and cooling also low cost. MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING, SUBURBS Scenario – medium density development with mix of house types (e.g. 50 units @ 35 – 75 (avg. 44) dwellings/ha). Solar hot water systems on individual houses are likely to be the easiest. However a stand-alone wind turbine could provide the lowest overall cost renewable source, if there is space away from the houses and an adequate wind regime available. Solar water heating gives more than 10% of total energy demand at 1.3% above base build capital costs. MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING, INFILL Scenario – Infill block, possibly 3 – 6 storey possibly shared with other uses below. Solar hot water systems are likely to be the cheapest option, as long as adequate roof space is available. Individual ground sourced heating systems are also a reasonable option. If communal heating is to be installed, biomass heating, becomes viable, as long as a suitable fuel supply and storage area are available. RESIDENTIAL TOWER Scenario – high density, high rise development e.g. 80 apartments in 22 storey block, possibly with other uses below. If communal heating is to be installed, biomass heating is cheapest, as long as a suitable fuel supply and storage area are available. Communal solar hot water is a further reasonable costs option. PRIMARY OR SECONDARY SCHOOL Scenario – school on an open site. A stand alone wind turbine could provide the lowest overall costs renewable source, if there is space and an adequate wind regime available. Biomass heating is also a viable option if there is a suitable fuel supply and storage area available, as is ground sourced heating/cooling. More than 10% of energy demand is possible from ground sourced or biomass heating at 0.9 – 1.9% above base build capital costs. Wind could provide 15%+ carbon reductions at 0.4% above base build capital costs. SPORTS CENTRE / HEALTH CLUB WITH POOL Scenario – site not shared with other uses. 25m pool and 4 court hall. A stand alone wind turbine could provide the lowest overall cost renewable source, if there is space and an adequate wind regime. A solar hot water system can also provide the necessary contribution at low cost. Biomass heating is a viable option if there is a suitable fuel supply and storage area available. Combined heat and power (CHP) supply should be an early consideration in reducing carbon emissions due to the high year round heat demand from the pool and water heating. Excess power can be exported to the grid. This would significantly reduce energy use and the scale of the renewable system required to meet the 10% Appendix 6 Additional Information and Guidance on Calculations for Carbon Savings from Low or Zero Carbon Technologies Please read all relevant notes, ensuring you have answers to all applicable questions. 1. Solar Water Heating We recommend completing the online ‘SAP 2005 calculations for Solar Water Heating Analysis’ on www.nottenergy.com/renewableenergy/tools2 Notes Individual SWH systems for domestic installations on a 3 bedroom house should not generally exceed 6m2. larger systems will generate more hot water than is useful, thus not save more CO2 Neither flat plate nor Evacuated tube panels should not be put on NE, N, NW facing roofs. Evacuated tube are more expensive, however more efficient, and better on E and W facing roofs. Separate carbon calculations must be carried out for each installed system and totalled for the final carbon saving from SWH. 3. Photovoltaics We recommend completing the online ‘SAP 2005 calculations for Solar PV Analysis’ on www.nottenergy.com/renewable-energy/tools2 Notes Panels should face at least between E, SE, S, SW, W to ensure cost benefit for CO2 saving. Panels will be significantly affected if there is shading Amount of power used onsite or exported does not affect the carbon saving, so systems can be included that generate more power than you can use. Separate carbon calculations must be carried out for each installed system and totalled for the final carbon saving from PVs. 4. Wind power We recommend completing the online ‘Wind power calculator’ on www.nottenergy.com/renewable-energy/tools2 Notes Due to turbulent and inconsistent wind flow, small wind power systems are not often suitable for urban environments. Generally sites must have a clear SW aspect with no obstructions to SW wind flow within around 100m. Does your site match this description? Turbine height should be calculated as height above ground level, so turbines mounted on tall buildings have access to higher and often uninterrupted wind speeds and generating potential. Turbines must be mounted above ridge lines and away from the edges of tall buildings to avoid turbulence. Amount of power used onsite or exported does not affect the carbon saving, so systems can be included that generate more power than can actually be used in the building. 5. Biomass It is recommended that developers read the guidance notes in Appendix 3 ‘Low or Zero carbon energy sources-a strategic guide’ particularlyNotes Biomass requires dedicated and suitably sized onsite fuel storage facilities and sufficient allowance for regular access for a delivery vehicle. Have you shown consideration of these issues? Larger systems need an arrangement for ash removal. Have you shown consideration of these issues? Biomass requires at least one; preferably several identified sustainable local sources (within 25 miles) of the appropriate biomass fuel. At least one should be able to commit to a long-term supply contract. This could be an ESCO arrangement where the fuel supplier owns and runs the boiler and sells the customer heat. Have you identified suppliers? In domestic installation biomass may cover 100% of the heating load. In non domestic installations it is safer to size biomass to meet a % of the load to ensure continuity of energy supply. What % of your energy supply is attributed to biomass? 6. Ground Sourced Heat Pumps NEP will soon have an online ‘GSHP calculator’ on www.nottenergy.com/renewable-energy/tools2 . Until that point we suggest using calculations from manufacturers, consultants or Appendix 3 ‘Low or Zero carbon energy sources-a strategic guide’ for this relatively complex technology. Notes A horizontal system, where pipes are laid in shallow arrays around or next to a building, can require significant areas of accessible ground to collect a meaningful amount of heat. Has this area been calculated and identified? Vertical systems require less space; however there can be many ground issues that make this option unviable, such as high ground water; mine workings; voids; coal measures or other unsuitable geological conditions. Have these been examined? GSHP systems use an electricity to harvest heat from the ground. For example one unit of electricity may yield 3 units of heat. This represents a Coefficient of Performance (CoP) of 3. An overall coefficient of performance (CoP) of more than 4 for a ground system will need to be exceptionally well justified. While theoretically possible, a COP over 4 is unusual in practice; unless the system is linked with a ground sourced cooling cycle, which can charge the ground up with heat in the summer. A system with a CoP of less than 3 is unlikely to offer any real carbon savings vs gas. If a GSHP system is to be installed has Ground Source Cooling also been considered? Passive cooling is a very low additional cost, if already installing ground loop heating. Adding ground sourced cooling can also push up the COP of the heating cycle over 4 and reduce the required number of ground loops, thus cut the cost. 7. Air Sourced Heat Pumps Air source heat pumps are standard for office cooling systems; if used only for this capacity they are not a qualifying technology. If air source heat pumps are use for providing heating, they can contribute to the 10% carbon target. ASHP though are unlikely to make a significant contribution unless replacing electrical heating systems. Is gas heating an option in the building? If so, ASHP systems are unlikely to offer significant carbon savings unless the system has a Coefficient of Performance (CoP) of more than 2.5 What is the CoP of your system in the average UK climate? CoPs of more than 2.5 are possible in the UK climate with modern technology, though a CoP exceeding 3.5 is highly unlikely. 8. Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Large, small and Micro-CHP systems offer the potential to reduce carbon emissions, but their operation and interaction with the buildings in which they operate is complex. This is particularly true with Micro-CHP, where understanding the energy performance and carbon savings benefits is developing and, on the basis of best available information and operating data to date, these devices are unlikely to be appropriate for modern flats and individual houses with small heat loss. Calculations for micro-CHP are available from Appendix 3 ‘Low or Zero carbon energy sources-a strategic guide’ You will need to undertake an independent professional analysis. This work should have justification to show that CHP is appropriate for the expected heat requirements of the development, as well as calculating likely carbon savings. Has a study been made? Have you also looked at the possibility of adding absorption cooling to replace standard cooling units? 9. Enviroenergy District Heating All district heating systems are different; each with their own associated carbon emissions. Calculations have been made to determine the CO2 emissions data for Nottingham’s network. Heat from the DH network is more than 35% better than natural gas. If the DH network is to provide your 10% carbon saving you should use the emissions factor calculated specifically for Nottingham’s system from Appendix Will DH provide for all of your heating and hot water or a %? If you are investigating connection to the DH heat network; have you also looked at the possibility of buying electricity from Enviroenergy? 10. Enviroenergy Electricity All district heating systems are different; each with their own associated CO2 emissions. Calculations have been made to determine the CO2 emissions data for Nottingham’s DH network. Electricity from the city network is more than 50% better than grid. If Enviroenergy electricity is to provide your 10% carbon saving you should use the emissions factor calculated specifically for Nottingham’s system from Appendix 2 Will DH provide for all of your electricity or a %? If you are investigating connection to Enviroenergy for private wire electricity have you also looked at the possibility of buying heat from the Enviroenergy district heating network? Appendix 7 Emissions Factors for Liquid Biofuels There is an increasing interest in the use of liquid biofuels in buildings to meet carbon reduction targets in building regulations and planning policy either in boilers or for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) There are a number of issues surrounding the use of these fuels to meet targets: 1. Carbon emissions from the use of most liquid biofuels are not appreciably lower than the emissions from equivalent gas fired boiler plant. 2. Sustained open market availability of affordable and adequate supply of suitable biofuels is unlikely, with increased demand for low carbon fuels. 3. The use of liquid biofuels has potential secondary impacts on food security and other wider issues of environmental sustainability. Generally liquid biofuels are unsuitable as a method of reducing CO 2 emissions in new buildings unless There is no possibility of a suitable gas grid connection And Liquid biofuels will be used in CHP or CCHP And sufficient feedstock for the production of liquid biofuels can be proven to come from a permanent on site source; such as waste cooking oil, tallow, process waste or agricultural products. Work by the Department for Transport (Renewable Fuels Agency) has established carbon emissions factors for a wide range of biofuels in transport. For simplicity only a small representative number of these default factors will be eligible for use in calculations for energy statements1. Fuel Emissions factor kg CO2 /kWh Bioethanol 0.22 Biodiesel from virgin crops (eg palm, rapeseed, or soy) 0.198 Biodiesel from waste oil or tallow 0.047 Bio-ETBE 0.245 Diesel 0.263 Petrol 0.253 If when calculating the emissions factors of biodiesel blends the above factors must be used in appropriate proportions B10 = 10% biodiesel + 90% diesel etc. As a guide Biodiesel blend Waste oil/diesel KgCO2 /kWh Virgin biodiesel/diesel KgCO2/kWh B10 0.241 0.257 B15 0.231 0.253 B20 0.22 0.250 B25 0.209 0.247 B30 0.198 0.244 B50 0.155 0.231 B75 0.101 0.214 B100 0.047 0.198 For developer reference Lower heating value Fuel Density kg/litre MJ/kg MJ/litre Ethanol 0.794 26.8 21.3 Biodiesel 0.890 37.2 33.1 Biogas -- 45.1 -- ETBE 0.750 36.3 27.2 MTBE 0.745 35.1 35.1 Gasoline 0.745 43.2 32.2 Diesel 0.832 43.1 35.9 HFO 0.970 40.5 39.3