Supplementary Materials Bacterioplankton community sampling and fingerprinting 121 bacterioplankton community (BC) samples were collected from the integrated upper water column (0-12m) on monthly- to twice-monthly basis from 2000-2009 under ice-free conditions on Lake Mendota, Wisconsin, USA. Sample dates are listed in Supplementary Table 1 (S1). Samples were collected from the location of maximum depth in Lake Mendota at 43° 06´ N, 89° 24´W, 327 m.s.l. Seasons were defined by the astronomical March and September equinox and the June solstice. Samples were filtered (0.2 m Pall Supor filters) and stored at -80 C until subsequent processing. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted with QBiogene Bio101 FastDNA extraction kit and modifications to manufacturer’s protocol described previously (Yannarell et al., 2003; Yannarell & Triplett, 2005), and followed by amplification by polymerase chain reaction and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) as described by Shade and colleagues (Shade et al., 2007). ARISA profiles were analyzed using Genemarker v 1.5 software (SoftGenetics, LLC) and a custom R script developed in the R statistics package (R Development Core Team, 2011) to aid in high-throughput ‘binning’ of peaks, as previously described (Jones & McMahon, 2009). Environmental variables Thirty-three physical, chemical and biological water quality parameters were collected at biweekly frequency during ice-free seasons by the North Temperate Lakes Long Term Ecological Research (NTL LTER) program at the same location as microbial sample collection; a complete listing of variables, protocols, and observational data is available at www.lter.limnology.wisc.edu and variables and abbreviations are listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 (NTL-LTER, 2011a, 2011b, 2011c). Data underwent quality control as described in NTL LTER protocols, all flagged data were removed, and replicates averaged. Phytoplankton samples were collected across a vertically averaged integrated depth 0-8m and biomass was summed at the division level for functional groups Cyanophyta, Bacillariophyta, and Chlorophyta. For zooplankton, organism density was used. For all other variables, discrete depth measurements were typically made every 1-4 m from 0-20 m depth; all variables measured between 0-12m depths were vertically-averaged. When NTL LTER observations did not co-occur with microbial sampling, timeweighted averages of observations within +/- 17 days were assigned to microbial observations. For >90% of samples, LTER environmental observations occurred within 7 days of bacterioplankton sampling. For time-weighted interpolation, nearby observations were averaged after being weighted by a value inversely proportional the absolute value of the number of days between water quality observations and microbial observations: Yint = [∑ni=1 wi *yi] / ∑ni=1 wi wi= 17-|xi-x0| Where Yint is the interpolated value used in subsequent analyses for microbial samples corresponding to day of year x0, n is the number of observations made within +/- 17 days of x0 for any given year, xi is day of year that variable yi was collected on. wi is the ‘weighted’ factor which is proportional to the temporal proximity of the water quality observation to the microbial observation. For example: a microbial sample was collected on day 50 (x0 = 50), and NTL LTER water quality samples were collected on day 40 (x1) and 54 (x2). If temperature is unknown on day 50, but had values of 15 (y1) and 18 (y2), Yint = [((17-|40-50|)*15)+ ((17-|54-50|)*18)] / ((17-|40-50|) +(17-|54-50|)) = 17.0 Table S1. Bacterioplankton community sampling dates Microbial sampling dates (mm/dd/yy) 3/15/00 8/29/02 8/2/05 7/22/08 3/30/00 9/12/02 8/19/05 8/7/08 4/14/00 9/24/02 8/31/05 8/22/08 4/27/00 10/8/02 9/18/05 9/5/08 5/11/00 10/22/02 10/10/05 9/15/08 6/6/00 11/7/02 11/8/05 10/2/08 6/20/00 11/20/02 4/6/06 10/17/08 7/17/00 5/13/03 4/21/06 2/24/09 8/1/00 5/28/03 5/4/06 4/29/09 8/17/00 6/9/03 5/15/06 6/9/09 9/12/00 6/27/03 6/9/06 6/18/09 9/26/00 7/23/03 7/13/06 6/26/09 10/10/00 8/7/03 7/17/06 7/7/09 10/24/00 9/8/03 8/3/06 7/30/09 11/28/00 9/22/03 8/22/06 8/10/09 3/13/01 10/15/03 9/8/06 8/26/09 4/23/01 11/11/03 10/6/06 9/13/09 5/21/01 5/19/04 10/20/06 9/27/09 6/4/01 5/26/04 11/3/06 10/9/09 7/2/01 6/11/04 11/16/06 10/26/09 7/5/01 6/25/04 5/11/07 11/14/09 7/16/01 7/8/04 5/29/07 12/4/09 7/30/01 7/22/04 6/11/07 8/13/01 9/2/04 7/23/07 8/28/01 9/16/04 8/6/07 9/10/01 9/30/04 8/20/07 9/26/01 10/12/04 9/27/07 10/20/01 9/16/04 10/12/07 11/6/01 9/30/04 11/1/07 11/26/01 10/12/04 5/10/08 5/24/02 4/11/05 6/5/08 7/1/02 5/25/05 6/25/08 8/1/02 6/22/05 7/11/08 Table S2. Environmental variables and abbreviations Environmental variables Abbreviation Month Month Year Year Day of year Day of year Day length Day Length Alkalinity Alk Calcium Ca Chlorophyll-a Chl Chloride Cl Dissolved inorganic carbon DIC Dissolved oxygen DO Dissolved organic carbon DOC Dissolved oxygen percent saturation DOsat Dissolved reactive silica DRSilica Iron Fe Potassium K Magnesium Mg Manganese Mn Ammonium NH4 Nitrate+ nitrite NO3NO2 Sodium Na Sulfate So4 Soluble reactive phosphorus SRP Total inorganic carbon TIC Total kjeldhal nitrogen TKN Total organic carbon TOC Total phosphorus TP Temperature Temp Zooplankton density Zoop pH pH Secchi depth Secchi Bacillariophyta biomass Bacillarophyta Chlorophyta biomass Chlorophyta Cyanophyta biomass Cyanophyta Figure S1 Co-occurrence network properties for a ten-year time series of environmental variables in Lake Mendota, WI, USA (number of nodes (S), edges (L), clustering coefficient (Cl), and characteristic path length (D)). Open circles indicate properties calculated for networks that include all observations for a given season. Boxplots represent observation-normalized results: we performed LSA (LSA R > 0.3, p < 0.001, no time lag) and network analysis on networks generated from Monte Carlo simulations of 30 randomly drawn observations from each season. Results of 1000 simulations for each season were aggregated and compared to test the effect on network properties of the number of observations included in the analysis. Boxes represent inter-quartile range and whiskers indicate 10th and 90th percentiles, red pluses indicate outliers. Significant differences exist between observation-normalized distributions of network properties from each season, for all properties (Wilcoxon rank sum test: α=0.01, p<0.0001). Figure S2 Box and whisker plots of co-occurrence network properties using same bootstrapping technique as described in main text, but with a range the correlative local similarity score (R values): 0.1 (upper plots) and 0.5 (lower plots). Plus signs indicate outliers, while boxes represent 10th and 90th percentiles, and median values. Network trends in clustering coefficient and average path length reported in text (decreasing cluster coefficient and increasing path length) were generally found in this sensitivity analysis. One exception to these trends is the average path length for seasonal distributions with higher (0.5) R-value (L-score). Citations Jones, S. E., & McMahon, K. D. (2009). Species-sorting may explain an apparent minimal effect of immigration on freshwater bacterial community dynamics. Environmental microbiology, 11(4), 905-13. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01814.x NTL-LTER. (2011a). Physical Limnology Dataset. North Temperate Lakes Long Term Ecological Research Program. Madison, WI. NTL-LTER. (2011b). Chemical Limnology Dataset. North Temperate Lakes Long Term Ecological Research Program. Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://www.lternet.edu/sites/ntl/ NTL-LTER. (2011c). Biological Limnology Dataset. North Temperate Lakes Long Term Ecological Research Program. Madison, WI. Shade, A., Kent, A. D., Jones, S. E., Newton, R. J., Triplett, E. W., & McMahon, K. D. (2007). Interannual dynamics and phenology of bacterial communities in a eutrophic lake. Limnology and Oceanography, 52(2), 487-494. doi:10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0487 R Core Development Team. (2011). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org Yannarell, a C., Kent, a D., Lauster, G. H., Kratz, T. K., & Triplett, E. W. (2003). Temporal patterns in bacterial communities in three temperate lakes of different trophic status. Microbial ecology, 46(4), 391-405. doi:10.1007/s00248-003-1008-9 Yannarell, A. C., & Triplett, E. W. (2005). Geographic and Environmental Sources of Variation in Lake Bacterial Community Composition. Applied and environmental microbiology, 71(1), 227-239. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.1.227