MODULE SPECIFICATION TEMPLATE
SECTION 1: MODULE SPECIFICATIONS
1. The title of the module INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
2. The Department which will be responsible for management of the module SPS
3. The Start Date of the Module 2002/3
4. The cohort of students (onwards) to which the module will be applicable. 2007/8
5. The number of students expected to take the module 100
6. Modules to be withdrawn on the introduction of this proposed module and consultation with
other relevant Departments and Faculties regarding the withdrawal None
7. The level of the module I
8. The number of credits which the module represents 15
9. Which term(s) the module is to be taught in (or other teaching pattern) 1 and 2
10. Prerequisite and co-requisite modules CH308
11. The programmes of study to which the module contributes Forensic Science, Forensic
Chemistry
12. The intended subject specific learning outcomes and, as appropriate, their relationship to
programme learning outcomes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
understand the principles of inorganic chemistry, including the major types of chemical reactions. (FC
Programme learning outcomes 3, 8)
be familiar with characteristic properties of the elements and their compounds, including group
relationships and trends within the s, p, d and f-blocks of the periodic table. (FC Programme learning
outcome 3)
understand the preparation, purification and analysis of a range of inorganic compounds using techniques
such as ion-exchange chromatography, infra-red and uv-vis spectroscopy. (FC Programme learning
outcome 4)
have the ability to interpret data derived from laboratory observations and measurements in terms of their
significance and the theory underlying them. (FC Programme learning outcomes 9, 13)
have skills in the safe handling of chemical materials and in the conducting of standard laboratory
procedures involved in synthetic work in relation to inorganic systems. (FC Programme learning outcomes
11, 12, 15)
13. The intended generic learning outcomes and, as appropriate, their relationship to programme
learning outcomes
6.
Problem-solving skills, relating to qualitative and quantitative information (FS Programme learning
outcome 16)
14. A synopsis of the curriculum
General Background [4 lectures]
Atomic structure. Electronegativity. Periodicity. Hard and soft acids and bases. Types of chemical bond. Lewis structures.
Physical properties of ionic and covalent compounds. The structures of covalent main group compounds predicted by
valence shell electron pair repulsion theory (VSEPR).
d-Block (Transition Metal) Chemistry [10 lectures]
Stereochemistry of metal complexes: geometrical, optical, structural, ionisation/hydration, linkage, coordination isomerism.
Bonding in transition metal complexes. Crystal field theory: crystal field splitting, factors effecting crystal field splitting,
the spectrochemical series, low spin and high spin complexes, crystal field stabilisation energy (CFSE), hydration energy of
M2+ ions, site selection in spinels and the Jahn Teller effect. Preparation and reactivity of transition metal complexes.
Colours of complexes: dd spectra, spin and Laporte selection rules, intensities of absorptions. Measurement of ligand
field splitting energy. Charge transfer absorptions.
Diamagnetism, paramagnetism, magnetic moment. Experimental measurement of the number of unpaired electrons in a
complex.
Some aspects of the chemistry of 3d transition metals; comparison with 4d and 5d series.
Thermodynamic and kinetic stability of metal complexes. Stability constants. The chelate effect. Lability of ligands.
f-Block Chemistry [3 lectures]
Comparison with the d-block elements. Position of lanthanides and actinides in the periodic table. Electronic
configuration, oxidation states and chemistry. The lanthanide contraction. Separation of lanthanide elements. ff
spectra. Chemistry of actinides: uranium.
s- and p-Block (Main Group) Chemistry [7 lectures]
A brief overview of the properties and chemistry of the elements in Groups 1, 2, 13-18. Topics included are occurrence,
extraction, purification and uses; ionisation energy, oxidation states, the diagonal relationship, donor-acceptor complexes,
pi-bonding, toxicity and forensic applications.
Laboratory: [5 half days]
Experiments in preparative and analytical inorganic chemistry, to include: the separation of nickel and cobalt by ionexchange chromatography; measurement of the ligand field splitting energy in a titanium (III) complex; preparation and
properties of complex ions; isomerism in coordination complexes.
15. Indicative Reading List
Cotton, Wilkinson and Gaus, Basic Inorganic Chemistry.
Greenwood and Earnshaw, Chemistry of the Elements.
Winter, d-Block Chemistry
Jones, d- and f-Block Chemistry
Henderson, Main Group Chemistry
16. Learning and Teaching Methods, including the nature and number of contact hours and the
total study hours which will be expected of students, and how these relate to achievement of
the intended learning outcomes
Lectures 24h which provide the opportunity to learn and understand the theory and knowledge required for
outcomes 1-4. Problems set during lectures will give practice in problem solving and answering examination
questions and provide opportunities for discussion of the module topics. (outcomes 1-4, 6)
Laboratory classes 15h which provide hands-on experience of preparative inorganic chemistry and experiment
report writing (outcomes 1-6)
Private study 50h reading lecture notes and books (outcomes 1-4, 6), 30h laboratory write-ups (outcomes 1-6), 11h
problem solving (outcomes 1-4, 6) 20h revision (outcomes 1-4, 6)
17. Assessment methods and how these relate to testing achievement of the intended learning
outcomes
Laboratory: 24% (outcomes 1-6),
Problems: 16% (outcomes 1-4, 6),
Examination: 60%
(outcomes 1-4, 6)
18. Implications for learning resources, including staff, library, IT and space
This is an existing module and there are no new implications for learning resources.
19. A statement confirming that, as far as can be reasonably anticipated, the curriculum, learning
and teaching methods and forms of assessment do not present any non-justifiable
disadvantage to students with disabilities
As far as can be reasonably anticipated, the curriculum, learning and teaching methods and forms of assessment
do not present any non-justifiable disadvantage to students with disabilities. The department recognises and has
embedded the expectations of SENDA, and supports students with a declared disability or special (educational)
need in its teaching, through the establishment of Inclusive Learning Plans agreed between student, department
and the Disability and Dyslexia Support Unit. We liaise with the Disability and Dyslexia Support Unit in order
to provide specialist support where needed.
SECTION 2: MODULE IS PART OF A PROGRAMME OF STUDY IN A UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT
Statement by the Director of Learning and Teaching: "I confirm I have been consulted on the
above module proposal and have given advice on the correct procedures and required content of
module proposals"
................................................................
..............................................
Director of Learning and Teaching
Date
…………………………………………………
Print Name
Statement by the Head of Department: "I confirm that the Department has approved the
introduction of the module and, where the module is proposed by Departmental staff, will be
responsible for its resourcing"
.................................................................
..............................................
Head of Department
Date
…………………………………………………….
Print Name