Infection Control Plan INFECTION CONTROL PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Infection Control Surveillance ....................................................................................................... 3 Healthcare-Associated Infection Summary Report by Outpatient Visits ...................................... 5 Monthly Infection Rates by Site ................................................................................................... 6 Line listing of Outpatient Infections .............................................................................................. 7 Infection Prevention Surveillance Data Entry Form ...................................................................... 8 Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Ambulatory Surgery ........................................................................ 9 Definitions of Infections for Surveillance Activities ................................................................... 10 Infection Prevention Plan ............................................................................................................. 16 Reportable Diseases ..................................................................................................................... 21 Outbreak Investigation ................................................................................................................. 22 Outbreak Investigation Form ....................................................................................................... 24 Healthcare-Associated Infections and Sentinel Events ................................................................ 26 Healthcare-Associated Infections Reviewed as Sentinel Events ................................................. 27 Page 2 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Control Plan Infection Control Surveillance PURPOSE To have knowledge of patient and employee infections to guide prevention activities and so appropriate actions/follow-up may be done. POLICY The Infection Preventionist does surveillance of infections among patients and employees. Healthcare-associated infections in ambulatory care are those associated temporally with an ambulatory care visit or with the care provided during the visit. Targeted surveillance may be done in the ambulatory setting with a focus on high-risk areas and those with a potential to reduce risks (i.e., surgical procedure-related infections). Ambulatory surgery centers shall develop a system for post-discharge surveillance. I. The Infection Preventionist does surveillance of healthcare-associated infections by: A. Review of culture reports and other pertinent lab data B. Nurse consultation and referral C. Medical record review D. Patient examination E. Personal consultation by employees F. Follow-up on communicable disease exposure G. Review of employee's physical assessments H. Maintenance of the employee infection record I. Physician consultation II. Specific definitions of healthcare-associated infections are used consistently. (See "Definitions") Healthcare-associated infections are reported monthly to the Quality or Infection Prevention Committee. III. Surveillance documentation is maintained on the: IV. A. Line Listing of Patient Infections B. Log of Employee Infections Outcome measures shall be monitored: A. Focus on the results of an activity, e.g., surgical procedure. B. Healthcare-associated infections are outcome measures. Page 3 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Control Plan V. Process measures shall be monitored: A. Involves monitoring of practices that directly or indirectly contribute to a health outcome. B. Focuses on observations and analysis of practices and environmental conditions. C. May include but not limited to: Enviromental Cleaning Sterilization process Medication use and storage VI. Reporting of infections to the Health Department is done as required by law. Reference: Friedman, C and Petersen, KH. Infection Control in Ambulatory Care (APIC). MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., 2004. Guidelines for Enviromental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities, CDC 2005 Page 4 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Control Plan Healthcare- Associated Infection Summary Report by Outpatient Visits Year 1 QUARTER 2 3 4 TOTAL Infections/1000 Outpatient visits Respiratory Upper Lower (pneumonia or bronchitis) Wound Surgical Decubitus Other (skin) Conjunctivitis Sepsis (Bloodstream) Other TOTAL BY SPECIALTY OR UNIT A. This month’s total infections: ÷ ÷ B. Total outpatient Visits for month: X 1,000 = X 1,000 = C. Infections per 1000 outpatient visits: Specific Trends: Actions Taken: Page 5 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Control Plan Monthly Infection Rates by Site Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total Respiratory Infection Cold 0 Pneumonia 0 Bronchitis 0 Sinusitis 0 Influenza-like illness 0 Total Respiratory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gastrointestinal C-diff 0 Noro-virus 0 Total Gastrointestinal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Skin Cellulitis/soft tissue/wound 0 Fungal skin infection 0 Herpes simplex (fever blister) 0 Herpes zoster (shingles) 0 Total Skin: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eye 0 Conjunctivitis Total Eye 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TASS Total TASS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Total Other Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Outpatient Visits HAI Rate per Outpatient Visits Page 6 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Control Plan Line Listing of Outpatient Infections Month___________ Year______ Name_______________ Date most recent visit_______ Type of Infection______ Symptoms/Date Cultures: Date/Site/Results Treatment Other actions (if needed) Does not meet infection criteria HAI CAI Name_______________ Date most recent visit_______ Type of Infection______ Symptoms/Date Cultures: Treatment Other actions (if needed) Does not meet infection criteria HAI CAI Name_______________ Date most recent visit_______ Type of Infection______ Symptoms/Date Cultures: Date/Site/Results Treatment Other actions (if needed) Does not meet infection criteria HAI CAI Name_______________ Date most recent visit_______ Type of Infection______ Symptoms/Date Cultures: Date/Site/Results Treatment Other actions (if needed) Does not meet infection criteria HAI CAI Name_______________ Date most recent visit_______ Type of Infection______ Symptoms/Date Cultures: Date/Site/Results Treatment Other actions (if needed) Does not meet infection criteria HAI CAI Name_______________ Date most recent visit_______ Type of Infection______ Symptoms/Date Cultures: Date/Site/Results Treatment Other actions (if needed) Does not meet infection criteria HAI CAI Name_______________ Date most recent visit_______ Type of Infection______ Symptoms/Date Cultures: Date/Site/Results Treatment Other actions (if needed) Does not meet infection criteria HAI CAI Date/Site/Results HAI = healthcare-associated infection for this facility CAI = community acquired infection (not healthcare-associated for this facility) Page 7 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Control Surveillance Data Entry Form Patient ID #: Patient Name: Visit Date: Age Infection Date: Site: Sex 48 hrs Preceding Infection Service: Operation Date Duration Yes No Procedure Hrs Min. MD visit date ER visit date Post-op antibiotics Type and route PNEU: CXR Confirmed Surgeon General Anes ASA Yes No 2nd Wound Class H&P Implant R L Scheduled case Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Bloodstream infection No DX: No NOTES: Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Room # Prophylactic antibiotics Incision Time Surg prophy abt (type & Route) Time Admin Culture Date Source Results Comments SIGNS/SYMPTOMS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF VISIT/PROCEDURE (Circle and indicate dates for all that may be considered related to suspected infection.) Fever (38° C/100.4° F) Chills Leukocytosis (>10k) Hypertension (systolic <90) Oliguria Apnea Tachypnea Decreased O2 sat. Respiratory distress Bradycardia Resp Rales Dullness to percussion Wheezing cough Change in character of sputum Increased production of respiratory secretions New onset of purulent sputum LRI Rhonchi Lung abscess Empyema URI Erythema of pharynx Sore throat Cough Hoarseness Purulent exudate Abscess Vascular Pain, erythema, or heat at vascular site Skin/wound Pain/tenderness Localized swelling Erythema Heat Pustules Vesicles Boils Change in burn wound appearance Eye GI Rhinorrhea Purulent drainage at vascular site Purulent drainage Abscess Purulent exudate from (circle one or more): Conjunctiva, eyelid, cornea, meibomian glands, lacrimal glands Eye pain Visual disturbance Hypopyon Conjunctivitis Nausea Vomiting Abdominal pain/tenderness Diarrhea (acute onset) Mental confusion Hyperglycemia Mental confusion Anorexia Purulent material from intraabdominal space Urinary Urgency Frequency Bone/Joint Drainage from suspected site Abscess Jaundice Abdominal distension Gross blood in stools Prefeeding residuals Dysuria Suprapubic tenderness Pyuria (>10wbc/mm3) Bone pain Joint pain Vertebral disc pain Effusion or limited motion Reference: Friedman, C and Petersen, KH. Infection Control in Ambulatory Care (APIC). MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., 2004. Page 8 © Precision Lens 2011 No No No No No No No Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event #: Patient Name Age Event Type: SSI Date of Event Outpatient Yes Date of Procedure No MDRO Infection: Yes No Specific Event Superficial Incisional Primary (SIP) Deep Incisional Primary (DIP) Superficial Incisional Secondary (SIS) Deep Incisional Secondary (DIS) Organ/Space (Specify Site:) Specify Criteria Used - Check all that apply: Signs & Symptoms Purulent drainage or material Pain or tenderness Localized swelling Redness Heat Fever Abscess Hypothermia Bradycardia Lethargy Cough Nausea Vomiting Other evidence of infection found on direct exam, during surgery, or by diagnostic tests Other signs & symptoms Detected Secondary Bloodstream Infection Page 9 © Precision Lens 2011 Laboratory Positive culture Not cultured Blood culture not done or no organisms detected in blood Positive Gram stain when culture is negative or not done Other positive laboratory tests Radiographic evidence of infection Clinical Diagnosis Physician diagnosis of this event type Physician institutes appropriate antimicrobial therapy Post-discharge surveillance Yes Return for follow-up No Definitions of Infections for Surveillance Activities Ambulatory care facilities generally have lower healthcare-associated infection rates than acute care facilities, yet surveillance is important to detect infections and to determine if there are opportunities for improvement by the facility. In order to have reliability and validity of surveillance data, specific definitions of infections must be used consistently. Specific national definitions for ambulatory care facilities have not yet been developed, therefore the following summary of definitions for long term care facilities is adapted from definitions published by McGeer and others in 1991. NOTE: Ambulatory facilities that are more acute care (e.g., surgery centers, dialysis) should use the CDC National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions of healthcare-associated infections. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/NNIS/NosInfDefinitions.pdf Reference: McGeer A, Campbell B, Emori TG, et al. Definitions of Infection For Surveillance In Long-Term Care Facilities. Am J Infect Control 1991; 19:1-7. Page 10 © Precision Lens 2011 Site: Upper Respiratory Common Cold Syndromes Criteria Conditions TWO or more of: running nose or sneezing stuffy nose (i.e., nasal congestion) sore throat or hoarseness or difficulty swallowing dry cough new swollen or tender glands in the neck (i.e., cervical lymphadenopathy) Symptoms must be acute and not related to allergy (seasonal or medication) Comments Fever not required, but does not exclude diagnosis Ear Criteria Diagnosis by a physician of any ear infection or Any new drainage from one or both ears Mouth (and Peri-Oral) (includes oral candidiasis) Criteria Diagnosis by physician or dentist of any infection Sinusitis Criteria Diagnosis by a physician Criteria Conditions Fever and THREE or more of: chills headache or eye pain malaise or loss of appetite sore throat dry cough Symptoms must be acute and Must be during influenza season Page 11 © Precision Lens 2011 Comments When this definition is met, it takes precedence over others Influenza-Like Illness Site: Lower Respiratory Pneumonia Criteria Interpretation by a radiologist of a chest x-ray as demonstrating pneumonia, probable pneumonia, or presence of an infiltrate with a compatible clinical syndrome Other Lower Respiratory Criteria Comments THREE or more of: Symptoms must be acute and either no chest x-ray, or x-ray does not meet the above criteria for pneumonia new or increased cough new or increased sputum production, fever, pleuritic chest pain new physical findings on chest exam (rales, rhonchi, wheezes, bronchial breathing) ONE or more of: new shortness of breath increased respiratory rate (>25/min.) change in mental status change in functional status Site: Gastrointestinal Tract Gastroenteritis Criteria Conditions Three or more loose or watery stools above what is normal for the patient in a 24 hour period or For the first two criteria, there must be no evidence of a non-infectious cause; e.g. for diarrhea: laxative, change in tube feeding or medication; for vomiting: change in medication, peptic ulcer disease THREE or more episodes of vomiting within a 24 hour period or Stool culture positive for a pathogen (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter species, or Clostridium difficile) with a compatible clinical syndrome Page 12 © Precision Lens 2011 Site: Eye Conjunctivitis Criteria Conditions One of the following: No evidence of trauma (e.g., foreign body) Pus appearing from one or both eyes >24 hours or allergy as a cause New or increased conjunctival redness, with or without itching or pain, present for at least 24 hours (pink eye) Site: Skin Cellulitis / Soft Tissue Wound Fungal Skin Infection Criteria Maculopapular rash and physician diagnosis or laboratory confirmation Conditions No evidence of a non-infectious cause (e.g., allergy to new medication) Herpes Simplex (cold sores) or Herpes Zoster (shingles) Criteria Vesicular rash and physician diagnosis or laboratory confirmation Scabies Criteria Maculopapular and/or itching rash and physician diagnosis or laboratory confirmation Conditions If there is no laboratory confirmation, then there must be no evidence of a noninfectious cause Unexplained Febrile Episode Criteria Documentation in the medical record of fever on 2 or more occasions at least 12 hours apart in any three day period Page 13 © Precision Lens 2011 Conditions No known infections or noninfectious cause for the fever (e.g., infection at any site, medication) Glossary CHANGE IN CHARACTER OF URINE: Any significant change in the gross (e.g., new bloody urine, foul smell or amount of sediment) or microscopic (new pyuria or microscopic hematuria) character of the urine. For microscopic changes, this means that the results of a previous urinalysis must be on the chart. There is no time limit on when the previous urinalysis may have been done. CHANGE IN FUNCTIONAL STATUS: A significant change in the patient's ability or willingness to carry out activities of daily living. For instance, new incontinence, new inability to walk to the dining room or increased difficulty in transfers would all be recorded as change in functional status. CHANGE IN MENTAL STATUS: A significant change in the patient's cognitive function: for most patients, this will mean an increased level of confusion (e.g., new non-recognition of nurses). COMPATIBLE CLINICAL SYNDROME: An acute illness with symptoms related to the relevant system (respiratory or gastrointestinal). In general, the symptoms will be some of those included in the definitions for either lower respiratory infection or gastroenteritis, but the criteria for the infection need not be met. DIAGNOSIS BY A PHYSICIAN: Requires one of: a written note by a physician specifying diagnosis, a nursing note specifying that a diagnosis was made by a physician or a verbal report from either a physician or nurse that a specific diagnosis has been made. EAR INFECTION: Includes infections of the external ear (otitis externa), middle ear (otitis media) or internal ear (otitis internal, labyrinthitis, vestibular neuronitis). FEVER: A single temperature, taken by any route, of > 100.5° F. HYPOTHERMIA: A temperature which is below 94° F or which does not register on the thermometer being used. LABORATORY CONFIRMATION: With respect to skin infections, acceptable lab confirmation consists of 1. 2. 3. Candida: Other fungi: Herpes zoster or shingles: 4. Scabies: positive culture from swab positive culture from scraping positive electron microscopic (EM) findings from scraping or positive culture of scraping on swab (note that EM cannot distinguish different species of Herpes) ositive microscopic exam of scrapings NEW PHYSICAL FINDINGS ON CHEST EXAM: New findings on examination of the chest with a stethoscope which suggest pneumonia: i.e., rales (crackles), rhonchi (wheezes) or bronchial breathing. ORGANISM THOUGHT TO BE A CONTAMINANT (in blood culture): Organisms which are common skin flora may contaminate blood cultures and a single blood culture positive for one of these may be non-significant. Page 14 © Precision Lens 2011 Medical Terms CONJUNCTIVA: Mucous membrane covering the eyeball. FLANK: Side of the body, below the rib cage and above the hip (the area in which pain is usually felt in upper urinary tract infections, referred to as the "costovertebral angle", is a relatively posterior area of the flank just below the ribs and extending from the side nearly to the backbone). LYMPHADENOPATHY: Enlargement of lymph glands. MACULOPA-PULAR: Applied to a rash characterized by abnormally colored (usually red) areas of skin, of varying size, which may be either flat or slightly raised. MALAISE: A feeling of generalized discomfort or uneasiness or being "out-of sorts". PATHOGEN: A microorganism capable of causing disease. PLEURITIC CHEST PAIN: Pain caused by inflammation of the pleura (lung lining), a sharp pain felt at any site over the rib-cage, which is brought on or made much worse by deep breathing. PURULENT: Containing the by-products of inflammation (pus). SEROUS: With watery consistency (as opposed to purulent). SUPRAPUBIC: Above the pubic arch (i.e., the area of the bladder, in the central lower area of the abdomen). VESICULAR: Applied to a rash characterized by blister-like lesions (i.e., localized areas of elevated skin, usually only a few mm in size, containing a watery substance). Page 15 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Prevention Plan PURPOSE To develop and maintain a written plan for infection prevention including an assessment of risk, services provided, the population served, strategies to decrease risk, and a surveillance plan. POLICY I. A current written infection prevention plan will be implemented. II. The written plan will include: A. Assessment of risk B. Assessment of services provided C. Assessment of the population served D. Prioritized strategies to decrease risk E. Evaluation of effectiveness of strategies F. Surveillance plan based on analysis of previous data. III. The written infection prevention plan will guide the activities of the infection prevention department. IV. The plan will be updated at least annually and more often as needed (e.g., changes in services provided, risks, etc.). V. The written plan with the evaluation of effectiveness of the strategies may facilitate development of an annual summary of the infection prevention program. Page 16 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Control Plan Assessment This plan has been developed by the Infection Prevention Committee with input and collaboration from the following: Safety Committee Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Committee Leadership Chief of Services/Medical Director A risk assessment is a component of this plan. The plan and risk assessment are formally reviewed at least annually and whenever significant changes occur in the elements that affect risk. Risk Assessment Date: Factors Characteristics that increase risks Geographic location and community environment Care, treatment and services provided, e.g.: Surgery Physician office visits Population characteristics, e.g.: Elderly, Diabetic Analysis of infection prevention and control data High Risk Problem-prone High Volume Improvement needed Page 17 © Precision Lens 2011 Characteristics that decrease risks Based on the risk assessment, the facility has identified the following risks and prioritized them in descending order: Priority Risk For each prioritized risk, identify goals, strategies, responsible person, time frame, and evaluation of effectiveness. IMPLEMENTATION RISKS GOALS STRATEGIES Responsible Persons Time Frame Method & Evaluation of Effectiveness Infection Control Plan Reviewed by: Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Leadership representative Date Date Date Leadership representative Date Page 18 © Precision Lens 2011 Infection Control Plan This plan has been developed by the Infection Prevention Committee with input and collaboration from the following: Important Aspects of Care Safety Committee Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Committee Indicators SURVEILLANCE of healthcare-associated infections, targeted to high-risk problemprone infections EXAMPLE Education Benchmark Data Source EXAMPLE EXAMPLE Obtain from literature or compare to this facility Medical records, lab reports, staff clinical evaluations New hires & Annual Within 30 days of employment and annually. Use national recognized organization’s information for training Employee Files Staff Immunizations New Hires & Annual (based on TB facility risk assessment) All new hires will have documentation of at least negative 1st step TB prior to patient care. Use State and CDC guidelines Employee Files Staff Immunizations New Hires Hep B Employee Infection/Communica ble Diseases Surgical Site Infections Community Acquired Infections Page 19 © Precision Lens 2011 Leadership Chief of Services/Medical Director Data Collection Sample Collected / Tabulated Reports EXAMPLE Infection Preventionist (IP) EXAMPLE EXAMPLE 100% of patients for one month prior & proceeding the month of FEB. 2010 On-going, Monthly/ Quarterly Infection Preventionist 100% of employee records Quarterly 100% employee records Quarterly Healthcare Acquired Infections Reportable Communicable Diseases Surgical Procedure Surveillance OR Cleaning Surveillance Sterile Processing Surveillance Housekeeping Surveillance Pharmacy Surveillance New Products/Equipment, (i.e. Medications, sterilizer Page 20 © Precision Lens 2011 Reportable Diseases PURPOSE To report diseases to the state as required by law. POLICY Health care facilities are required by law to report certain diseases. A list of these diseases and the report forms from the health department are maintained and reporting is done as required. An exception to reporting is if there is knowledge that the disease has already been reported by the laboratory or other provider. Fill in your State Health Departments reporting information Page 21 © Precision Lens Infection Control Outbreak Investigation I. DEFINITION An outbreak is defined as two (2) or more cases over the usual (endemic) number of cases of healthcare–associated infections, usually produced by the same organism. The time period will vary according to the infection. II. RECOGNITION AND NOTIFICATION Any personnel recognizing a possible epidemic will immediately report this to the Infection Prevention department through which the facility management and medical director will be notified. III. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION The IP (and others as assigned), is designated as the investigation coordinator. He or she will review the charts of the involved patients and determine that an epidemic exists. The investigation coordinator, director of nursing, administrator, and medical director will confer and prepare a preliminary plan of investigation including the following: A. A working definition of a case will be developed. B. The presumptive hypotheses for the mode of transmission of the organism and other circumstances will be developed. Procedures for testing the hypotheses will be outlined. C. The Infection Preventionist will gather and compile data related to the infection(s) as follows: 1. Conduct case finding (review ongoing surveillance charts of other patients at risk and microbiology reports) to determine whether there have been other cases of the infection 2. Evaluate previous facility experience with the infection 3. Prepare a line listing of cases to include: patient, room number, date of admission, date of infection onset, site culture results, and physician 4. Plot number of cases by date of onset (epidemic curve) 5. Review patient charts of cases and interview involved personnel for various factors that conceivably may have played a role in transmission of an infection, e.g., geographic locations of patients, specific personnel having contact with patients, medications and treatments administered. 6. Review various Infection Prevention techniques (hand hygiene, use of standard precautions, etc.) as actually practiced in the facility 7. Maintain surveillance for occurrence of any further infections D. The IP will communicate with the lab regarding: 1. Page 22 © Precision Lens Any need for isolates of the involved organism(s) to be saved for further study (e.g., biotyping, antimicrobial sensitivity patterns, phage typing, serotyping) Infection Control E. IV. The IP will communicate with management regarding: 1. Whether any environmental and/or personnel cultures are to be taken by whom and by what technique 2. What patient care items suspected of being possible sources of infection may need to be impounded or quarantined COMMUNICATIONS The IP will ensure that the following individuals are notified concurrently with the preliminary investigation and advised at reasonable intervals of the progress of the investigation: attending physicians, the DON, medical director, administrator, and others as needed. V. IMMEDIATE CONTROL Reasonable immediate control measures will be put into effect. Such measures might include but are not limited to isolation, removal of common suspected sources of personnel from patient contact, or immediate inservice training in certain Infection Prevention techniques. VI. PUBLIC INFORMATION Any questions from the community, uninvolved personnel, or news media are directed to the administrator who will act as public information coordinator. VII. ANALYSIS OF DATA The data collected in the preliminary investigation are reviewed by the investigators to determine whether a common source of infection, break in technique, etc., can be implicated as the cause of the epidemic. A preliminary written report will be prepared. VIII. FURTHER INVESTIGATION If the cause of the infection is not evident as a result of the above investigation, expert consultation will be sought. Reporting of the potential outbreak will be done to public health as required by law. IX. CONCLUSION OF INVESTIGATION The investigation is continued at least as long as there are cases of the infection occurring above the endemic level. A final written report of the investigation, outlining findings and recommendations, is prepared by the investigation coordinator and issued to the Infection Prevention committee, others participating in the investigation, attending physician(s), director of nursing, and others as needed. Page 23 © Precision Lens Infection Control Outbreak Investigation Form Steps of an Investigation 1. Verify the diagnosis; identify the agent. Describe the initial magnitude of the problem and what symptoms got the facility's attention. What diagnosis has been established? What agent (bacterial, viral, other) has been identified? Develop a case definition (specific criteria for a case). Example: All patients who have had 3 or more loose stools in the last 24 hours. Case Definition: 2. Confirm that an outbreak exists. Use your case definition to find all cases. Based on your knowledge in #1, are the numbers of cases above what is endemic (usually seen) in the facility? If yes, consider that an outbreak exists. (Realize that one case of some organisms may constitute an outbreak, e.g. your facility's first case of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus.) Yes Total number of cases so far: Date: Do you have an outbreak? 3. No Search for additional cases. Encourage immediate reporting of cases (laboratory, physicians, and personnel). Search for other cases by retrospective record review, lab reports, etc. Total number of cases: 4. Yes If yes, proceed. No Date: Characterize the cases by person, place, and time. Person: (Patient characteristics - age, sex, disease, exposures, treatments) Place: (Consider ward, hall, and room, outside exposures. May use facility maps.) Time: What is the period of the outbreak? What is the probable source of exposure? Record dates of onset and draw an epidemic curve. Page 24 © Precision Lens Infection Control 5. Form a tentative hypothesis (best guess at the time). Review data to determine common host factors and exposures. Develop a best guess on the: Reservoir Source Mode Of Transmission 6. Institute preliminary control measures. Initiate control measures based on what you know. (Hand hygiene, isolation, cohorting, etc.) Determine if you need outside assistance. Control measures Date implemented Assistance needed? 7. Yes No Test the hypothesis. Many behavioral health facility problems never reach this stage. It may end without intervention or simple control measures may cause the problem to cease. Special epidemiologic studies may be needed and we may need to seek help. 8. Refine the control measures. Add additional control measures if needed. Control Measure 9. 10. Date Added Monitor and evaluate the control measures. Are control measures being used appropriately? If no, insure compliance. Yes No Evaluate control measures. Did cases cease? If no, consider additional actions. Yes No Prepare and disseminate a final report. This form in a completed state may serve as the final report. Make the report as detailed as possible. Date of final report: Reported to: Reported by: Page 25 © Precision Lens Infection Control Healthcare-Associated Infections and Sentinel Events PURPOSE To manage as sentinel events all identified cases of death and major permanent loss of function attributed to a healthcare-associated infection (i.e., except for the infection, the patient would probably not have died or suffered loss of function). PROCEDURAL GUIDELINE I. Identification of cases to be reviewed II. A. During infection surveillance activities and following identification of healthcareassociated infections, the Infection Preventionist (IP) will be alert to cases of death and/or major permanent loss of function among patients having been identified as having a healthcare-associated infection. B. The sentinel event coordinator, in reviewing for sentinel events, will be alert to cases of death and/or major permanent loss of function among patients that may also have a healthcare-associated infection. If a potential case is identified, the sentinel event coordinator will communicate that information to the IP. C. All unexpected deaths occurring in a hospital following transfer from the behavioral health facility will be reviewed by the IP for presence of healthcareassociated infection and the potential for a sentinel event. Review and follow-up of potential cases A. Once alerted to the potential of a healthcare-associated infection as a sentinel event, the IP will conduct a review of the patient records to determine if the case meets the definition of a healthcare-associated infection related sentinel event. If the case clearly is not a sentinel event (e.g. the patient was terminally ill prior to the infection, other life threatening events/illnesses were present, etc.), no further review will be needed. If the IP cannot make the determination, the case will be reviewed in the Infection Prevention (QA/IP) Committee and with the attending physician if needed to make a determination. If it is determined to be a sentinel event, the facility procedural guideline for sentinel events will be followed, including completion of a root cause analysis. Page 26 © Precision Lens Infection Control Healthcare-Associated Infections Reviewed as Sentinel Events Room Unit Name Physician Date and Symptoms of Healthcare-Associated Infections Transfer to Hospital? Yes Yes Reason for transfer No If yes, name loss of function No Death? Yes If yes, cause of death No Possible sentinel event? Yes Type of Infection Diagnoses and conditions If yes, date: Permanent loss of function? Admission Date If yes, date to QA/PI Committee Determination by committee? If yes, RCA completed date No Rationale or discussion Page 27 © Precision Lens Infection Control