MINUTES
SSPC 62.1
Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality
June 21-22, 2008
Salt Lake City, Utah
Approved By Chair: 8/18/2008
Approved By SSPC: 1/24/2009
1
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Index of Major Motions ....................................................................................................... 3
Action Items .......................................................................................................................... 4
Attendance ............................................................................................................................. 5
I.
Call to Order / Introductions ................................................................................... 6
II.
Review of Agenda ..................................................................................................... 6
III.
Approval of Minutes ................................................................................................. 6
IV.
Chair’s/Vice-Chair’s Report.................................................................................... 6
V.
Staff Report/Comments............................................................................................ 8
VI.
TC Liaison Reports................................................................................................... 9
VII.
IAQ Design Guide Update ..................................................................................... 11
VIII. Education Subcommittee Report .......................................................................... 11
IX.
Ozone Air Cleaning Update ................................................................................... 13
X.
Future Addenda Discussion ................................................................................... 14
XI.
Administration Subcommittee Report .................................................................. 15
XII.
Public Comment Session ........................................................................................ 16
XIII.
Recess ...................................................................................................................... 17
XIV. Call to Order/Introductions ................................................................................... 18
XV.
SPLS Liaison Report/Comments........................................................................... 18
XVI. SPC 189.1 Liaison Report ...................................................................................... 18
XVII. Education Subcommittee Actions ......................................................................... 19
XVIII. Action on Addendum 62.1i (2007) ......................................................................... 19
XIX. Administrative Subcommittee Actions ................................................................. 24
XX.
New Business ........................................................................................................... 26
XXI. Adjournment…………………………………….………………………………...26
ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................................... 27
2
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
Index of Major Motions
June 21-22, 2008
Salt Lake City, UT
Motion #
Page #
1
6
2
18
3
20
4
22
5
22
6
23
7
23
8
24
9
24
Motions
Approve the minutes of the January 19-20, 2008 New York meeting.
(Sheinman/Clements)
MOTION 1 PASSED 9-0-1 CNV
Approve the Program Plan for Chicago (Winter Meeting 2009) and Louisville
(Annual Meeting 2009).
(Eli Howard/Clements)
MOTION 2 PASSED 12-0-1 CNV
Approve the 4th publication public review of Addendum 62.1i to delete Section
6.2.9.
(McFarland/Sheinman)
MOTION 3 OPEN (10-3-0 CV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to
Absent Members)
Approve the 1st publication public review of a new addendum that modifies
General Note 2 of Table 6-1 to read as follows:
“2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke: This table applies to ETS-free areas. Refer
to Section 5.18 for requirements for buildings containing ETS areas and ETSfree areas.”
(McFarland/Clements)
MOTION 4 OPEN (11-1-1 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to
Absent Members)
Approve the 4th publication public review of Addendum 62.1c as amended.
(McFarland/Clements)
MOTION 5 OPEN (10-1-1 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to
Absent Members)
Approve the 3rd publication public review of Addendum 62.1d (independent
substantive change to the 2nd public review) and the response to the commenter
from the 2nd public review.
(McFarland/Fisher)
MOTION 6 OPEN (12-0-1 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to
Absent Members)
Approve the 2nd publication public review of Addendum 62.1g as amended.
(McFarland/Clements)
MOTION 7 OPEN (12-0-1 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to
Absent Members)
Approve the 1st publication public review of draft Addendum DA-09 (Section 8
changes) as amended.
(McFarland/Clements)
MOTION 8 OPEN (11-1-1 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to
Absent Members)
Approve the response to the request for an official interpretation of Standard
62.1-2004 from Diogo Prado.
(McFarland/Hedrick)
MOTION 9 PASSED 12-0-1 CNV
3
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
Action Items from Salt Lake 2008
AI #
1
2
3
4
Action
Staff to post a copy of Standard 145.1P on the Members
Only section of the SSPC 62.1 website for member use.
Eli Howard to notify Staff when the IAQ Design Guide is
available for peer review of the 90% document and Staff is
to notify SSPC 62.1.
Staff to post copies of the Chapter Presentations (developed
by the Education Subcommittee) on the Members Only
section of the SSPC 62.1 website and notify SSPC 62.1 of
the deadline for review and comment.
SPLS Liaisons for 62.1, 55 and Guideline 10 should look at
the TPS for each of these documents to see if there are any
conflicts.
Assigned to
Status
Staff (Weber)
Open
Howard/Staff
(Weber)
Open
Staff (Weber)
Open
Brandt
Open
Assigned to
Status
Chair (Stanke)
Open
Staff (Weber)
Complete
Staff (Weber)
Complete
Staff (Weber)
Complete
Chair (Stanke)
Open
Staff (Weber)
Complete
(sent by
e-mail on
1/19/2008)
Staff (Weber)
Complete
Action Items from New York 2008
AI #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Action
Chair will pursue a new liaison from TC 2.4 to replace Jim
Moulton.
Staff to post a copy of Standard 180P on the Members Only
section of the SSPC 62.1 website for member use.
Staff to notify SSPC 62.1 of the public review dates for the
2nd public review of Standard 189.1P.
Staff to notify SSPC 62.1 when the IAQ Design Guide is
available for peer review of the 60% document.
Chair will send a message to all of the TC research
subcommittee chairs to find any current or proposed
research projects of interest to SSPC 62.1.
Staff to e-mail a copy of the Education Subcommittee draft
ASHRAE positions for the ICC public hearing February
2008.
Staff to add a note beside the VRP spreadsheet that is posted
with Addendum n to 62-2001 indicating that it is obsolete
and is superseded by the version that accompanies the user’s
manual.
4
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
ATTENDANCE
SSPC 62.1
MEETING OF JUNE 21-22, 2008
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
MEMBERS PRESENT
Technical Committee Liaisons
Alevantis,
Leon
TC 9.10 Liaison
6/21 6/22
PCVMs
Stanke,
Dennis
Chair
Hedrick,
Roger
Vice-Chair
Apte,
Michael
Clements,
Waller
Conover,
David
Danks,
6/21 6/22
X
Brandt,
Donald
SPLS Liaison
X
Kelter,
S. Louis
TC 9.8 Liaison
X
Lawton,
Wayne
TC 5.8 Liaison
X
X
X
Muller,
Christopher TC 2.3 Liaison
X
X
X
Sekhar,
Chandra
TC 4.3 Liaison
X
X
X
Shapiro,
Leon
TC 5.7 Liaison
X
Richard
X
X
Sterling,
Elia
TC 7.9 Liaison
X
Fisher,
Francis
X
X
Trafton,
Phillip M.
TC 9.1 Liaison
Girman,
John
X
X
Wellford,
Bede
TC 5.5 Liaison
Howard,
Eli
X
X
Howard,
Roger
Magee,
Chris
McFarland,
John
Rogers,
Lisa
Schoen,
Lawrence
Sheinman,
Woodford,
OM-ICC
OM-SMACNA
X
X
Hodgson,
Michael
Houston,
Thomas
X
Int-Hout,
Daniel
X
Mattsson,
Bernice
Morey,
Philip
Persily,
Andy
X
X
OM-ARI
PSVMs
Alevantis,
Leon
Subcommittee
Administration
Bohanon,
Hoy
Education
Buttner,
Mark
Education
X
Damiano,
Leonard
Education
X
Gallo,
Francis
Education
Galatro
Vincent
Education
Herrmann,
Donald
Administration
Lawton,
Wayne
MacMillan,
Donald
Muller,
Christopher Education
X
Rothstein,
Duane
Administration
X
Sekhar,
Chandra
X
Siano,
Dennis
X
X
X
GUESTS PRESENT
X
6/21 6/22
Abbaszadeh, Sahar
Smith,
CTG Energetics,
Irvine, CA
Diane National research
Council Canadian
Codes Centre
Cynthia American
Nonsmokers’ Rights
Foundation
Ron
Choi
AAF International
Hal
Molly
Taylor Engineering
Member SPC 189.1
Adam IAPMO
Dan
Ruskin Mfg.
Charles Camfil Farr & TC 2.4
Liaison
Jeff
Georgia Power Co.
Tebano,
Nicole
Fiberweb, Inc.
Terzigni,
Mark
SMACNA
Greene,
X
Hallett,
X
Administration
Holdaway,
Kyung-Ju,
Levin,
McGuire,
X
Spata,
Anthony
Education
Alt. OM-AGA
Administration
Administration
Thomann,
Wayne
Education
X
X
Education
X
X
Vyavaharkar, Dilip
X
X
X
X
X
6/21 6/22
Consultants
Grimsrud,
David
OM-AGA
Harris
Michael
X
X
Muliawan,
Rau,
Seyffer,
STAFF PRESENT
Weber,
5
Mark
Assistant Manager of
Standards-American
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
SSPC 62.1
June 21, 2008
In these minutes only the motions voted by the Project Committee will be recorded and only discussion
necessary for the clarification of the motion will be included. All motions and agenda items are presented
in the section of the minutes that corresponds with the numerical order of the agenda. The agenda order
may not have been followed.
I.
Call to Order / Introductions
Chairman Dennis Stanke called the meeting of SSPC 62.1 to order at 8:00 a.m. at the
Hilton Salt Lake in Salt Lake City. The Chair had all members and guests introduce
themselves indicating their affiliation. The Staff Liaison determined that a quorum was
not present but was established prior to any committee voting. A record of member and
guest attendance is provided on the preceding page.
II.
Review of Agenda
The Chair reviewed the agenda and asked if there were any additions or deletions. No
changes were made to the agenda. Copies of the agenda were made available to members
and guests.

III.
ATTACHMENT A – SSPC 62.1 Salt Lake Agenda
Approval of Minutes
(Secretary’s Note: Approval of the minutes was delayed until a quorum was established. This occurred
after the TC Liaison reports in Section VI of these minutes.)
The Chair asked if there were any changes to the New York minutes; there were none.
It was moved by Harris Sheinman and seconded by Waller Clements:
1
That the minutes of the January 19-20, 2008 New York meeting be approved.
MOTION 1 PASSED 9-0-11, CNV. (Hand count)
(Secretary’s Note: Minutes were available for review on the Members Only section of the SSPC 62.1
website at http://sspc621.ashraepcs.org.)
IV.
Chair’s / Vice-Chair’s Report
a. Intervening Letter Ballots: The Chair announced that there were several letter
ballots that followed the New York meeting in January 2008.
The following is a list of the continuation letter ballots for publication public review
(PPR):
1
Reason for abstention: Dennis Stanke – Chair not voting (CNV).
6
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008




62.1a (DA04 – Section 4, 5 cleanup) approved for publication.
62.1c (DA13 – OA cleaning) for 3rd PPR. The committee is now dealing with
comments.
62.1d (DA14 – Table 6-1 additions) for 2nd PPR (Independent Substantive
Change). The committee is now dealing with comments.
62.1i (DA12 - ETS ventilation) for 4th PPR. This motion failed and the addendum
did not get posted for public review and comment. The committee continues to
deal with comments and a revised draft for a 4th public review. The committee
will consider this again in Salt Lake City.
b. Unofficial Interpretations. The Chair announced that he had responded to several
requests for unofficial interpretation and that he would include those requests and
responses in the Salt Lake minutes. ASHRAE often receives requests from
individuals looking for a quick response and those requests are forwarded to the
Chair. The Chair often gets feedback from other project committee members before
sending an unofficial response.
(1.) Request from Mr. Luis Garcia regarding kitchenettes in Table 6-4 of 62.1-2004.
Mr. Garcia has interpreted the requirements to mean small residential kitchen.
The Chair’s response was no, it is a small area in an office that contains small
appliances, refrigerator and microwave. See Attachment B. David Conover did not
agree with the Chair’s interpretation stating that a kitchenette is something in a
multifamily residential building. David suggested that the chair forward any
request that deals with building codes to him and he would in turn run it by the
ICC Technical Committee for their input. They can have a written response
within five days.
(2.) Request from Mr. Luis Garcia regarding the location of openings for naturally
ventilated spaces. This second request from Mr. Garcia deals with Section 5.1
and the distance from an operable opening to the outdoors. The Chair indicated
that the 25 ft. minimum requirement was to the furthest point in the zone. See
Attachment C.
(3.) Request from Mr. Brian Coldwell regarding toilet exhaust and whether it is
significantly contaminated. Standard 62.1 does not include separation distance for
toilet exhaust. The committee is currently working on an addendum that will clear
up this issue. See Attachment D.
(4.) Request from Mr. Jacob Blevins regarding the distance of an operable wall in an
occupied space. Entryways, stairways, halls and closets in residential dwelling
units are intended for human activities and must be ventilated in accordance with
the requirements of either Section 5 (natural ventilation) or Section 6 (procedures
for mechanical ventilation), regardless of the duration of occupancy. See
Attachment E.
In the future the Chair intends on copying the full committee whenever a response to
a request for an unofficial interpretation is sent out.

ATTACHMENT B – Request for Unofficial Interpretation from Mr. Luis
Garcia.
7
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008



ATTACHMENT C – Request for Unofficial Interpretation from Mr. Luis
Garcia.
ATTACHMENT D – Request for Unofficial Interpretation from Mr.
Brian Coldwell.
ATTACHMENT E – Request for Unofficial Interpretation from Mr.
Jacob Blevins.
c. Voting Roster. (Stanke, Hedrick, Apte, Clements, Conover, Danks, Fisher, Girman,
E. Howard, R. Howard, Magee, McFarland, Rogers, Schoen, Sheinman, and
Woodford)
The Chair announced that the terms of five voting members would end after the Salt
Lake City meeting and four of those would be rolling off the committee. The Chair
took this opportunity to thank them for their service.
Richard Danks, John Girman, Roger Howard, Larry Schoen, and Chris Magee all
have terms that end June 30, 2008.
The Chair also welcomed new members.
V.
Staff Report / Comments
a. Bio and Bias of Conflict Note Book/Sign-in. Mark Weber reported that the Bio and
Bias of Conflict notebook was currently unavailable but would be available during
the Sunday session for any member of the project committee wishing to review it. A
sign-up sheet was circulated.
b. Review of Action Items. According to the New York City minutes there were seven
action items open. All completed action items will be reported as complete in the
minutes for Salt Lake City.







AI #1 – Open.
AI #2 – Complete. Staff posted a copy of the publication draft of Standard
180P on the Members Only Section of the SSPC 62.1 website.
AI #3 – Complete. Staff notified the project committee by e-mail on
2/22/2008. The 2nd public review of Standard 189.1P began 2/22/2008.
AI #4 – Complete. IAQ Design Guide was available for peer review on
2/18/2008. SSPC 62.1 was notified by e-mail on 2/15/2008.
AI #5 – Open.
AI #6 – Completed during the New York meeting.
AI #7 – Complete. Staff added the note to the website.
Mark also reminded everyone of the SSPC 62.1 website. The “Members Only”
section of the website includes a copy of the official SSPC 62.1 roster, organizational
chart, PDF and Word versions of Standard, Word versions of addenda, an addenda
status report, and the draft meeting minutes from New York 2008.
8
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
(Secretary’s Note: PC Chairpersons can no longer allow anyone other than PC members to view Bio
and Bias of Conflict information and this information may not be copied by any member to which it is
shown. This information is treated as sensitive and confidential material. See Section 4.7.3.2 of PC
MOP.)
(Secretary’s Note: SSPC 62.1 website http://sspc621.ashraepcs.org.)
VI.
TC Liaison Reports
a. TC 2.3 - Gaseous Air Contaminants and Gas Contaminant Removal Equipment.
Chris Muller, TC 2.3 liaison, reported that the TC is holding a forum on Wednesday
morning (Forum 17) at 9:45 a.m. titled “Hot Topics: SPC 145.2 Method of Testing
Full-Scale Gaseous Contaminant Filters”. Chris also announced that SPC 145 would
meet Sunday afternoon. The publication of Standard 145.1P (Laboratory Methods for
Assessing the Performance of Gas Phase Air Cleaning Systems: Loose Granular
Media) is still being processed, galleys are complete.
AI#1 Staff to post a copy of Standard 145.1P on the Members Only section of the SSPC 62.1
website for member use.
TC 2.3 meets Tuesday afternoon from 1:00-3:30 p.m.
b. TC 2.4 – Particulate Air Contaminants and Particulate Contaminant Removal
Equipment. Jim Moulton, TC 2.4 liaison, was not present. In his absence Charles
Seyffer reported that TC 2.4 meets late Tuesday afternoon, 3:30-6:00 p.m. RP-1281 is
now available on the ASHRAE website. TC 2.4 has been more aggressive at
publishing articles dealing with building issues and Standard 62.1. Included in the list
of articles are titles such as “Who is MERV anyway”, “How to Investigate Odor
Problems in Real Buildings”, Importance of Dust Holding Capacity (DHC) - Real
Life Usage”, Use of Filtration in Process Applications”, Energy Conservation using
the IAQ Procedure”, and “LEED & Air Filtration”. Other items of interest include
possible articles on UV light effects, the ISO process, and Standards 52.1 (how to
retire it) and 52.2 (round robin results, testing and 52.2 conditioning, and problems
with lab variations).
c. TC 4.3 – Ventilation Requirements & Infiltration. Chandra Sekhar, TC 4.3 liaison,
reported that the TC is currently prioritizing four research projects (RTARs) and is
actively pursuing ideas for research. TC 4.3 will sponsor a seminar (Seminar 65) in
Salt Lake City on Wednesday from 9:45-10:45 a.m.in the Salt Palace Convention
Center. TC 4.3 will also cosponsor a transactions session (Session 6) in Salt Lake on
Monday titled “Emergency Evacuation and Smoke Control in High-Rise Office
Buildings”. TC 4.3 meets Monday afternoon 4:15-6:30 p.m.
d. TC 5.5 - Air-to-Air Energy Recovery. Bede Wellford, TC 5.5 liaison, was not
present. No report was given.
e. TC 5.7 - Evaporative Cooling. Leon Shapiro, TC 5.7 liaison, reported that the TC
meets Monday from 4:15 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. The TC will sponsor a seminar (Seminar
70) on Wednesday morning in the Salt Palace Convention Center. The title of this
9
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
seminar is “Indirect and Direct Evaporative Cooling at Altitude with Attitude”. Leon
also announced that TC 9.2 will sponsor a forum on Sunday (Forum 2) at 1:10 p.m.
titled “ASHRAE Handbook’s Industrial Applications Chapters: What’s Missing,
What’s Needed, What Do You Want to See?”
f. TC 5.8 - Industrial Ventilation Systems. Wayne Lawton, TC 5.8 liaison, indicated
that there was nothing to report with regard to TC 5.8 activities. Wayne did report
that TC 5.4 was beginning some research on testing pulse jet filters that they intend to
use in developing a new ASHRAE standard.
g. TC 7.9 – Building Commissioning. Elia Sterling, TC 7.9 liaison, reported that the
TC would meet on Sunday from 3:00-5:00 p.m. The TC will sponsor Forum 13 on
Monday at 11:00 a.m. titled “What Changes Are Needed to Chapter 42 on HVAC
Commissioning in the 2007 Applications Handbook?”
h. TC 9.1 - Large Building Air-Conditioning Systems. Phillip Trafton, TC 9.1 liaison,
was not present. No report was given.
i. TC 9.8 – Large Building Air-Conditioning Applications. Lou Kelter, TC 9.8 liaison,
was not present. No report was given.
j. TC 9.10 - Laboratory Systems. Leon Alevantis, TC 9.10 liaison, reported that the TC
would meet on Tuesday in Salt Lake City. TC 9.10 will also hold two seminars on
Tuesday, parts 1 and 2 on VAV systems: Seminar 42 is titled “Using Variable Air
Volume Systems to Achieve High Performance Laboratory Buildings, Part 1:
Selecting the Right System and Seminar 53 which is “Part 2: Ensuring Performance”.
Leon stated that the 2007 handbook did not include an update and there will be a
supplement issued that will be available for free download and distributed to those
that purchase the book. Leon also indicated that lab classification may affect the entry
in the 62.1 table and the committee should be on the lookout for it.
Charles Seyffer announced that Standard 180 is being held up by appeals but will likely
be published soon. There is some concern that there are a lot of committees doing
duplicate work with respect to maintenance. Standard 170 is also including maintenance.
Standard 180 covers some information that is possibly in Standard 62.1 and it should not
be in multiple documents. The committees need better communication and coordination.
It is counterproductive to duplicate work.
The Chair indicated that it would be a good idea for SSPC 62.1 to wait until Standard 180
is published before developing its maintenance section. Maintenance was discussed in the
Administration Subcommittee during the Friday meeting.
(Secretary’s Note: At this point the Chair entertained a motion to approve the draft minutes from New
York.)
10
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
VII.
IAQ Design Guide Update
Eli Howard announced that the IAQ Design Guide Steering Committee meets on Sunday
from 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. in the Salt Palace Convention Center, room 151G. The
committee will be discussing the comments received on the 60% draft. There has been
some miscommunication between the IAQDG Project Committee and the Steering
Committee (SC). The committee expects to set up a satellite broadcast in April 2009. Eli
invited everyone to attend the SC meeting on Sunday. There will be a 90% draft available
for peer review in the fall 2008.
AI#2 Eli Howard to notify Staff when the IAQ Design Guide is available for peer review of the
90% document and Staff is to notify SSPC 62.1.
The IAQDG Project Committee will meet on July 14, 2008 in Seattle, Washington.
VIII. Education Subcommittee Report
Eli Howard, Education Subcommittee Chair, with the help of Michael Apte, reported
from the subcommittee minutes (See Attachment F) as follows:
a. Salt Lake City Programs. There is a seminar to be held on Tuesday at 8:00 a.m.
(Seminar 38) titled “Improving Building Performance by Using the IAQ Procedure”.
b. Chicago and Louisville Programs. The Education Subcommittee intends on
submitting three programs for Chicago: a seminar on demand controlled ventilation, a
forum titled “Is 30% More Outdoor Air Really Better?” and a forum titled “What
Does the Society Need from ASHRAE 62.1 Regarding Industrial Facilities?”
Possible programs for Louisville 2009 include two seminars. One seminar titled
“Energy Efficient Ventilation Air Conditioning and Air Distribution”, most likely
cosponsored with TC 5.5 and TC 5.7. The second seminar is titled “Risk and Ethics in
HVAC Energy Conservation is School”, possibly cosponsored with the
Environmental Health Committee (EHV).
The programs must be prioritized prior to submittal.
c. Educational Activities (ALI, Distinguished Speakers, Web Broadcast). There is a
professional development seminar (PDS) titled “Complying with ASHRAE Standard
62.1-2007” to be offered by the ASHRAE Leaning Institute (ALI) on Saturday in Salt
Lake City. Hoy Bohanon is the instructor.
d. Scripted Presentation(s) for Chapter Programs. The subcommittee has completed
editing the two PowerPoint presentations and is ready to move these for committee
approval. There are two presentations, the first is an update and overview of 62.1 and
the other is an update on the VRP and IAQ Procedures. The Chair indicated that it is
unlikely that the project committee would have sufficient time to review the
presentations before the Sunday session and suggested the drafts be posted on the
62.1 website with a deadline for review and letter ballot for approval. Eli suggested
11
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
July 15th or July 31st as the deadline, none was established at that time. The Chair will
talk with Eli after the Salt Lake meeting with regard to the deadlines. (See
Attachments G and H)
AI#3 Staff to post copies of the Chapter Presentations (developed by the Education
Subcommittee) on the Members Only section of the SSPC 62.1 website and notify SSPC
62.1 of the deadline for review and comment.
e. Rate Rationale Spreadsheet and White Paper Discussion. John McFarland and
Andy Persily are writing the rate rationale article. Eli asked whether SSPC 62.1
needed to approve or endorse the rate rationale paper after it is complete. The Chair
envisions the committee reviewing and providing comments on the final paper
prepared by Andy, the author will then make changes as he sees fit, and the Chair will
then send out a letter ballot to the SSPC to endorse it. The article would then be
published. Subcommittee is currently waiting for Andy to complete the draft.
Waller Clements volunteered to update the spreadsheet to incorporate what is in the
62.1-2007 tables. The rate rationale spreadsheet is not informative enough for use by
the general public; it should remain a committee tool. A second spreadsheet may be
created for exhaust rate rationale. The subcommittee discussed air classes; there were
some concerns over supply rates per person and space types. May need a new
category for working warehouses, where people actually work, rather than storage
alone. Shipping and distribution is mainly a storage area. The subcommittee intends
on sending a proposal to the Administration Subcommittee.
f. Research Needs and Activities. The subcommittee has established four research
projects approved by the full committee in New York. They are:
(1.) Ozone Research – Michael Apte developed an RTAR. The SSPC needs to
urge the Environmental Health Committee (EHC) to proceed. Chandra Sekhar
will take it to EHC on Monday and Chris Muller will take it to TC 2.3 to
cosponsor.
(2.) Effectiveness of Evaporative Cooling Equipment in Removing Ozone – This
is a TC 5.7 research project that the SSPC would cosponsor.
(3.) Methods for Demand Control Ventilation (DCV) – This is a TC 1.4 research
project that the SSPC would cosponsor. Research project will compare the
effectiveness of different methods of DCV.
(4.) Part Load Ev for Gas Fired Heating Systems – Ev is currently 0.8. Systems
usually cycle on and off so temperature is not consistently 15˚F above the
space. What impact does equipment cycling have on Ev? SSPC would
cosponsor with a TC, possibly TC 4.3 or TC 5.3.
g. Code Interaction Activities. Eli Howard stated that Code Interaction Subcommittee
(CIS) was successful in getting the ventilation tables incorporated into the UMC.
However, there was opposition at the IECC hearings from other ASHRAE members.
12
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
The exhaust rate table did not go through; there were some conflicts and it was
pulled. The book of challenges comes out some 45 days in advance, so sometime in
July 2008. CIS is working on future submissions for code changes to bring forward to
the full committee, possibly in Chicago in January 2009. February 15th is the deadline
for proposed changes with the hearings in September 2009.
Michael Apte stated that the project committee needs to get 62.1 more code
adoptable. David Conover suggested 62.1 be more adoptable by reference rather than
in pieces. The Chair stated that it was a good idea to look at ways to make 62.1 more
compatible with codes. The committee should look at format and content changes that
would make 62.1 more usable and adoptable by the code community. Leon Alevantis
states that 62.1 needed to be changed with regard to separation distances before CIS
goes back to UMC with a code change proposal.
h. Introduction of Expected Motions on Sunday Session.
Eli indicated the Education Subcommittee would have no motions to bring forward to the
full committee during the Sunday session.



IX.
ATTACHMENT F – Draft Education Subcommittee Minutes for Friday,
June 20, 2008
ATTACHMENT G – Chapter Presentation: ASHRAE 62.1 Update:
Overview – Where are we now?
ATTACHMENT H – Chapter Presentation: Ventilation Rate Procedure and
IAQ Procedure
Ozone Air Cleaning Update
In Larry Schoen’s absence Chris Muller announced that he had been involved in the
paper being submitted by Larry in Copenhagen. Chris indicated that he has not seen the
final approved version of the paper. The Chair indicated that Larry would give a brief
presentation when he arrived.
Break...15 minutes.
After the break Larry Schoen arrived and gave an update on the paper. Larry indicated
that the paper had a small group of authors that includes Doug Crosar, Chris Muller and
himself. The paper provides practical aspects of ozone removal from outdoor air; sort of a
preliminary guide for ozone removal. In summary, there are things that can be done to
reduce ozone but the best is activated carbon. There is very little published to help the
designer select off the shelf equipment. Standard 62.1 requires 40% removal efficiency.
Clean and dirty particulate filter do remove some ozone. When lab testing activated
carbon filters other contaminate loading must be considered. Lab testing doesn’t always
convert into what is needed in the field. Lab testing seems to vary widely with regard to
filter longevity and efficiency. Fields results seem to be more promising that lab results,
but field testing results don’t seem to be consistent with the lab tests. During a 92 hour
lab test the filter had 96% removal efficiency at the beginning of the test and 58%
removal efficiency at the end. This seemed to be a rather large drop in the filter efficiency
13
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
for such a short test. Larry went on to state that there is no comprehensive cost data
available; there is some data however. The physical size and increased pressure drop are
also issues that must be considered. In addition, there isn’t a lot of data from
manufactures on when to replace an activated carbon filter. The paper also discusses the
location for the filter, outdoor air stream is one possibility, but not all systems have them.
High humidity also degrades the ozone efficiency of the filter. The paper also discusses
when to leave the filter installed (high ozone periods) and at what time to remove it.
In summary, a good particulate filter should be installed before the activated carbon filter.
Estimated cost of the filter bed is $0.20-0.40/ sq. ft. of building per year or $0.02-0.03/sq
ft. of building per year for pleated filters with activated carbon imbedded in the filter
itself. Not much information is available on ozone cleaning. Mike Apte suggested that it
is much like the chicken and egg problem. Unless industry perceives that there is a
problem with ozone they are not going to bring products to market. Something needs to
be done to get industry involved. There is a huge market available for someone. The
SSPC needs to guide industry in this area; it could make a big difference in people’s
health. Little information is available in the marketplace and the SSPC should push for
more research in this area.
Larry Schoen added that Michael Apte did review the paper and did provide input.
TC Liaison Reports Continued...
TC 1.4 – Control Theory and Application. At this point the Chair recognized Len
Damiano, TC 1.4 Liaison. Len announced that the TC would meet Tuesday from 1:00 –
3:00 p.m. TC 1.4 is sponsoring a program for Salt Lake City that might be of an interest
to the project committee, Seminar 7 on Sunday titled “Using Direct Digital Controls as a
Tool to Commission Sustainable Buildings.”
X.
Future Addenda Discussion
The Chair, Dennis Stanke, gave a presentation pointing out the weak spots of Standard
62.1 and possible future updates for the standard, from the Chair’s perspective. Potential
weak sports for future action include the IAQ procedure, dynamic reset (DCV), VRP
complexity, natural ventilation in Section 5.1, and occupancy categories. The Chair
proceeded to lead a discussion of each of these issues. (See Attachment I)
The IAQ procedure is weak and requires a lot of judgment on the part of the user. The
designer must decide on a list of contaminants of concern, perhaps a possible list of
contaminant of concern could be added to the standard. Common sources of these
contaminates could also be added to the standard. There are many loopholes and
outcomes from this procedure vary widely and allow for too much non-engineering
judgment. It can’t be used for LEED or for building codes.
With regard to dynamic reset he committee needs to provide better instructions for DCV
for multiple zone systems.
14
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
The Ventilation Rate Procedure seems to need a simpler compliance path that could be
used by some designers and code officials. The VRP has been labeled as too complex by
many designers. Can the calculated compliance path be simplified?
Natural ventilation in Section 5.1 needs stronger requirements. The Chair indicated that
he has received many questions regarding this and the standard does not provide very
good guidance in this area. Can the committee improve the requirements?
Occupancy categories were the last item of discussion. Space types and occupancy
categories should be coordinated with model codes. With the IMC, UMC or both?
Another possible suggestion for change and improvement in the standard would be to
address and clarify high-rise residential. Is it correct to separate them at three stories?
What’s the difference between three and four stories? Improvements could be made to
better address ventilation in high-rise residential buildings.

XI.
ATTACHMENT I – PowerPoint Presentation – Standard 62.1 Future
Addend Needs, Where Should We Go?
Administration Subcommittee Report
John McFarland, Administration Subcommittee Chair, distributed six handouts that
include recommendations the subcommittee would bring to the full committee during the
Sunday session. See Attachments J through O. John indicated that the subcommittee got
through many but not all of the items on its agenda. It did not get to DA-17 (IAQ
Procedure Update), DA-15 (Section 8 Cleanup and Compliance with Standard 180), DA16 (Separation Distances), and the request for an official interpretation from Avery Colter
(Natural Ventilation in Kitchen). Included are the Administration Subcommittee minutes
from their Friday (6/20/2008) meeting. See Attachment P.
a. Request for Interpretation. John distributed a copy of the subcommittee approved
response to the request for official interpretation from Diogo Prado. The
subcommittee intends on recommending the response for approval by the SSPC
during the Sunday session. See Attachment O.
b. Change Proposals and Expected Motions. No change proposals.
c. Addenda Status and Expected Motions. John provided handouts and gave updates
on the responses to commenters and revised drafts for Addenda 62.1c, 62.1d, 62.1g
and 62.1i, and a new proposed draft Addenda DA-09 to 62.1-2007 as follows:
i.
62.1c (2007) – OA Cleaning, response to 3rd public review. John provided
some background information on the 4th publication public review draft of
Addendum 62.1c and the responses to the 3rd public review comments. During
the Sunday session the subcommittee will bring forward a motion to the full
committee for approval of the 4th publication public review of 62.1c. There
were 5 comments from 5 commenters on the 3rd public review draft. See
Attachment J.
15
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
ii.
62.1d (2007) – Table 6-1 revisions, response to 2nd public review. John
indicated that on Sunday the subcommittee would bring forward a motion to
approve a 3rd publication public review for Addendum 62.1d (ISC independent substantive change to the 2nd public review draft) and the draft
response to the 2nd public review comment. There was 1 comment from 1
commenter on the 2nd public review draft. See Attachment K.
iii.
62.1g (2007) – Demand Controlled Ventilation, response to 1st public
review. John provided some background information on the 2nd publication
public review draft of Addendum 62.1g and the draft responses to the
comments on the 1st public review which the subcommittee will bring forward
to the full committee for approval during the Sunday session. See Attachment
L.
iv.
DA-09 (Section 8 Operation and Maintenance). John distributed a copy of
the 1st publication public review of DA-09 that the subcommittee will bring
forward to the full committee for approval during the Sunday session. See
Attachment M.
v.
62.1i (2007) – ETS Ventilation, response 3rd public review. John indicated
the subcommittee had taken a new approach to this addendum. There are
clearly three parts to the addendum so the subcommittee decided to look at the
options available. The addendum can be separated into three parts: (1) Table
6-1 General Note 2, (2) Section 6.2.9, and (3) Note to Section 6.2.9. In the
handout for 62.1i John presented three public review options. The
subcommittee did not prioritize these options. During the Sunday session John
intends to narrow these options down to one or two in order to limit the
discussion. The intent is to select an option from A, B and C and package that
for a vote for a 4th publication public review of Addendum 62.1i. See
Attachment N.







XII.
ATTACHMENT J – Addendum 62.1c (2007)
ATTACHMENT K – Addendum 62.1d (2007)
ATTACHMENT L – Addendum 62.1g (2007)
ATTACHMENT M – Addendum DA-09
ATTACHMENT N – Addendum 62.1i (2007)
ATTACHMENT O – Request for Official Interpretation from Diogo Prado
ATTACHMENT P – Administration Subcommittee Minutes for Friday,
June 20, 2008
Public Comments Session
The Chair asked if there was anyone who had any comments. The Chair recognized
Cynthia Hallett who stated that she had participated in the Administration Subcommittee
discussions on Addendum 62.1i during the Friday meeting and that it was very helpful
and productive. Cynthia submitted the original continuous maintenance proposal that
generated this addendum. She indicated that her intent was to remove conflicts and
16
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
increase the clarity of the standard. She wants the standard to provide guidance to
designers without setting any rate for acceptable ETS.
There were no other comments.
XIII. Recess
The meeting was recessed until 1:00 PM, Sunday, June 22, 2008.
17
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
SSPC 62.1
June 22, 2008
XIV. Call to Order/Introductions
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dennis Stanke at 1:00 p.m. at the Hilton
Salt Lake in Salt Lake City. Introductions were made around the room and it was
determined by the Staff Liaison that a quorum was present.
Voting Roster: (Stanke, Hedrick, Apte, Clements, Conover, Danks, Fisher, Girman, E.
Howard, R. Howard, Magee, McFarland, Rogers, Schoen, Sheinman, and Woodford)
The Chair asked if there were any changes to the agenda. There were no changes.
The Staff Liaison announced that the purple Bias/Conflict Notebook was available for
any member wishing to review it. A sign-up sheet was circulated.
(Secretary’s Note: PC Chairpersons can no longer allow anyone other than PC members to view Bio and
Bias of Conflict information and this information may not be copied by any member to which it is shown.
This information is treated as sensitive and confidential material. See Section 4.7.3.2 of PC MOP.)
XV.
SPLS Liaison Report / Comments
The Chair recognized the SPLS Liaison, Donald Brandt. Don welcomed everyone to Salt
Lake City and announced that Standards Committee had approved Addendum “a” to
Standard 62.1-2007 for publication during their Saturday meeting. He also brought to their
attention the presentation given during the PC Chair’s Breakfast on the online comment
database and the fact that it was put into operation during the spring 2008 public review
period for some Standard 135 addenda and is currently in use for some 90.1 addenda. The
public review for the 135 addenda went well. For the fall 2008 public review period the
online comment database could be used for a limited number of documents or for all
public review drafts. That decision has yet to be made.
AI#4 SPLS Liaisons for 62.1, 55 and Guideline 10 should look at the TPS for each of these
documents to see if there are any conflicts.
XVI. SPC 189.1 Liaison Report
The Chair recognized the SPC 189.1 Liaison, Molly McGuire. Molly provided an update
on the status of the project committee. They have been reviewing and drafting responses
to the comments on the second public review that was held back in February 2008. She
stated that the comments on Section 8 of the draft standard would be of the most interest
to the members of SSPC 62.1 and this discussion is included on the SPC 189.1 agenda for
Monday night at 6:30 p.m. for anyone who would like to attend. Molly thanked everyone
on SSPC 62.1 for reviewing the public review draft of Standard 189.1 and for providing
comments. She indicated a possible third public review may follow (ISC public review).
XVII. Education Subcommittee Actions
18
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
Eli Howard, Chair of the Education Subcommittee, reminded everyone that the Chapter
presentations will be posted on the Members Only section of the SSPC 62.1 website and
for everyone to please take a look and get comments back to him by July 31st. He would
like to include these presentations in the 2008-2009 program schedule. He asked for
everyone to provide comments via e-mail and send those comments to him.
Eli brought the following motion to the full committee:
It was moved by Eli Howard and seconded by Waller Clements:
2
Approve the Program Plan for Chicago (Winter Meeting 2009) and Louisville (Annual
Meeting 2009). See below and Attachment F.
Chicago Programs:
1. Demand Control Ventilation – Meeting the Requirements of Standard 62.1
(SEMINAR)
2. Is 30% More Outdoor Air Really Better? (FORUM)
3. What does the society need from ASHRAE 62.1 regarding industrial
facilities? (Cosponsor FORUM)
Louisville Programs:
1. Energy Efficient Ventilation Air Conditioning and Air Distribution
(SEMINAR, cosponsor with TC 5.5 and TC 5.7)
2. Risk and Ethics in HVAC Energy Conservation in Schools (SEMINAR,
cosponsor with EHC)
MOTION 2 PASSED 12-0-12, CNV. (Hand count)
XVIII. Action on Addendum 62.1i (2007)
John McFarland, Chair of the Administration Subcommittee, referred to the handout from
the Saturday session dated 6/21/2008. Based on the handout John preceded with a series
of straw poll votes to determine the preferred options and to narrow the options down to
one or two that could be packaged as the 4th publication public review of Addendum i to
62.1-2007. Committee members could only vote for one or the other option as presented.
Below are the straw poll results for the various options presented. See Attachment N.

2
Table 6-1 General Note 2:
Vote
Option
A1 vs. A2
3
8
Vote
A2 vs. A3
0
12
Reason for abstention: Dennis Stanke – Chair not voting (CNV).
19
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
Vote
A3 vs. A4
3
10
Vote
A4 vs. A1
11
1
From the straw poll results it appears as though the committee preferred Option
A4.

Section 6.2.9: John added “designed to be” after the words “shall be” in Options
B2 and B4 as follows:
Option B2: “6.2.9 ETS Areas. Outdoor airflow rates in ETS areas shall be designed to be
determined using other methods, but shall be designed to be no less than the rate for
comparable ETS-free spaces.”
Option B4: “6.2.9 ETS Areas. Outdoor airflow rates intended to control comfort and
odor shall be designed to be greater than those for comparable ETS-free areas.”
Vote
Option
B1 vs. B3
7
6
Vote
B1 vs. B2
6
7
Vote
B2 vs. B4
9
4
Vote
B1 vs. B4
8
5
From the straw poll results it appeared like the committee preferred Option B1.

Note to 6.2.9: John deleted the word “specific” from Options C2, C3a, C3b and
C5 as follows:
Option C2: “Note: This standard does not prescribe specific outdoor airflow rates for
ETS areas since acceptable minimum concentration limits for ETS have not been
established.”
Option C3a: “Note: This standard does not prescribe specific outdoor airflow rates for
ETS areas since acceptable minimum concentration limits for ETS have not been
established. Dilution ventilation in ETS areas has not been shown to eliminate adverse
20
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
health effects, even at outdoor airflow rates that are substantially higher than those
prescribed for comparable ETS-free areas.”
Option C3b: “Note: This standard does not prescribe specific outdoor airflow rates for
ETS areas since acceptable minimum concentration limits for ETS have not been
established. Dilution ventilation in ETS areas has not been shown to provide acceptable
indoor air quality, even at outdoor airflow rates that are substantially higher than those
prescribed for comparable ETS-free areas.”
Option C5: “Note: This standard does not prescribe specific ventilation rates for ETS
areas.
Vote
Option
C2 vs. C5
5
8
Vote
C1 vs. C2
2
11
Vote
C1 vs. C5
2
11
Vote
C3a vs. C3b
2
10
Vote
C3b vs. C4
11
2
Vote
C3b vs. C5
7
6
David Conover stated that he prefers no note. The scope already states that nosmoking areas are not covered by the standard. Joe Fisher stated that there is no
conflict in Option C5. The Chair stated that C5 states the obvious. Note C3b
should explain why the standard doesn’t include any prescribed rates in Section
6.2.9. David Conover suggested adding a note to the foreword of the document
rather than in Section 6.2.9. John McFarland indicated that there seemed to be a
consensus that there should be a note in Section 6.2.9, but not whether there
should be a Section 6.2.9. Larry Schoen suggested some new language, perhaps
an Option C6 that reads “Note: There is no known rate that achieves acceptable
risk.” Eli Howard spoke against this language stating that the term “risk” should
not be used in the standard. John McFarland stated that Options C2, C3a and C4
are not out of the running.
Vote
Option
C1 vs. C3b
4
9
21
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
Vote
C2 vs. C3b
6
7
To summarize, John stated that there is a strong preference for Option A4; B2 received
the most votes and B1 was second to B2. C3b received more votes when compared to the
other options. After some discussion John took a second straw poll with regard to
Options B1 and B2.
Vote
Option
B1 vs. B2
8
5
John concluded that deleting Section 6.2.9 seemed to be preferred (Option B1).
Break....15 minutes.
After the break John made the following motion:
It was moved by Joe Fisher and seconded by Harris Sheinman:
3
Approve the 4th publication public review of Addendum 62.1i to delete Section 6.2.9.
DISCUSSION: Roger Hedrick spoke against the motion to delete Section 6.2.9. He
stated that by specifying no minimum rate for ETS areas unscrupulous designers could
meet the requirements of the standard by posting a sign that states “ETS Area” and thus
show LEED compliance. Leon Alevantis stated that this doesn’t seem to be a valid argument, 0
cfm doesn’t meet 62.1. Eli Howard stated that it conflicts with the scope of Standard 62.1
and stated that the committee doesn’t need to concern itself with whether or not is does or
doesn’t meet LEED. Larry Schoen stated that if a designer doesn’t have integrity there
are many things they can do to beat the system and still comply with the requirements.
Leon Alevantis spoke in favor of the motion stating that the committee should do what’s
right. Eli Howard spoke in favor of the motion adding that leaving Section 6.2.9 in the
standard causes a conflict with the scope. David Conover asked what the commenters
from the previous public reviews thought about this motion. Those commenters present
were given an opportunity to speak.
Hoy Bohanon stated that it seemed appropriate to delete Section 6.2.9 and that he was ok
with the change.
Eli Sterling stated that the motion to delete Section 6.2.9 is ill founded and that he agrees
with Roger Hedrick. There will be misunderstandings of what the project committee is
trying to accomplish. Designers will be able to meet the requirements of the standard
even with ETS areas. Standard 62.1 is supposed to be an international standard and where
will countries such as China turn, to ASHRAE? Eli went on to state that it seems the
committee is taking the easy way out by simply deleting the section. There were some
agreements between the commenters on the first, second and third public review drafts
22
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
that the committee could work with. The committee was on a good track in New York
and now seems to have taken a U-turn. The committee should expect to receive
comments on this latest draft.
Cynthia Hallett stated that she appreciated all of the subcommittee’s hard work on this
issue. She supports the deleting of Section 6.2.9, as she originally proposed. It eliminates
any conflict in scope and ASHRAE Board position with regard to ETS.
Mike Apte spoke for the motion and stated that he doesn’t think the committee is taking
the easy way out. It’s been a long road to get where it is now and currently the standard
cannot deal with ETS. This change will make the standard more consistent.
The Chair called for the motion. See Attachment Q.
MOTION 3 OPEN (10-33-0 CV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to Absent
Members)
It was moved by John McFarland and seconded by Waller Clements:
4
Approve the 1st publication public review of a new addendum that modifies General Note
2 of Table 6-1 to read as follows: “2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke: This table applies
to ETS-free areas. Refer to Section 5.18 for requirements for buildings containing ETS
areas and ETS-free areas.” See Attachment S.
MOTION 4 OPEN (11-14-15 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to Absent
Members)


ATTACHMENT Q – 4th Public Review Draft of 62.1i(2007)
ATTACHMENT R – Motion 3 Roll Call Vote Record
3
Reasons for negative votes:
 David Conover – Would not fully respond to commenters on the 3 rd public review. More importantly, while
Section 2.5 of 62.1 says 62.1 does not provide specific rates for ETS areas, if there is no “general” guidance
in 6.2.9 on ETS area ventilation and the note to Table 6-1 is approved then I am concerned. The silence on
the issue, while not providing “specific” rates would lead to someone not at least applying Table 6-1 as a
minimum to ETS areas.
 Roger Hedrick – I voted against the motion because I believe that removing Section 6.2.9 means that
buildings with ETS spaces can claim compliance with Standard 62.1, regardless of the ventilation rate
provided to those spaces, even if it is quite low, such as 5 cfm/person. I find this situation to be
undesirable, and might in fact provide an incentive for designating spaces to be ETS spaces. At worst, it
opens a loophole for a designer to claim compliance with the Standard while supplying low ventilation
rates simply by designating spaces as ETS, even if smoking is not allowed, thereby gaining an energy
advantage.
 John McFarland – By eliminating a minimum threshold for outdoor air flow rates in ETS-areas, provides an
opportunity of an ETS-area to comply with the Standard with an outdoor airflow rate below that for a
comparable ETS-free area.
4
Reasons for negative votes: David Conover – Would not fully respond to commenters on the 3 rd public review.
More importantly, while Section 2.5 of 62.1 says 62.1 does not provide specific rates for ETS areas, if there is no
“general” guidance in 6.2.9 on ETS area ventilation and the note to Table 6-1 is approved then I am concerned. The
silence on the issue, while not providing “specific” rates would lead to someone not at least applying Table 6-1 as a
minimum to ETS areas.
5
Reason for abstention: Dennis Stanke – Chair not voting (CNV).
23
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008


ATTACHMENT S – 1st Public Review Draft of a New Addendum that
Modifies General Note 2 of Table 6-1 (Secretary’s Note: identified as DA-18)
ATTACHMENT T – Motion 4 Roll Call Vote Record
XIX. Administration Subcommittee Actions
John McFarland, Chair of the Administration Subcommittee, referred everyone to the
handouts provided during the Saturday session. No new handouts were provided. John
then proceeded to bring subcommittee recommendations to the full committee for vote.
a. Requests for Interpretations. See below immediately following the Addenda
Motions.
b. Addenda Motions.

Addendum 62.1c (2007) - See Attachment J.
It was moved by John McFarland and seconded by Waller Clements:
5
Approve the 4th publication public review of Addendum 62.1c.
DISCUSSION: The words “or guideline” were added after the word “standard” in
Sections 6.2.1.1 and 6.2.1.2 as a friendly amendment. Leon Alevantis suggested that
columns 3 and 4 in Table XX-2 be deleted and the duplicate counties with the same
design values be reduced. This was accepted as a friendly amendment. Hoy Bohannon
stated that the committee should be consistent or leave the standard as is. The current
numbers in the standard are over a decade old and the committee should at the very least
update the EPA standards that have changed. Larry Schoen stated that the rationale
should be included in the foreword for the addendum so that reviews know where the
numbers come from. Hoy Bohanon indicated that someone should substantiate the
calculation. Larry Schoen suggest the word “summary” be changed to “selected” in the
notes to Sections 6.2.1.1 and 6.2.1.3. This was accepted as a friendly amendment.
Additional changes to the informative appendix and the notes where suggested and
accepted as friendly amendments. See Attachment U.
The Chair called for the question.
MOTION 5 OPEN (10-16-17 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to Absent
Members)

Addendum 62.1d (2007) - See Attachments K and W.
It was moved by John McFarland and seconded by Waller Clements:
Michael Woodford – I object to including the ozone requirement of 0.107 ppm in Section 6.2.1.3 in the body of the
Standard. ASHRAE should not be specifying the level. Also, I believe we do not have valid information yet to
extend the requirement to the large numbers of geographic areas now included.
7
Reason for abstention: Dennis Stanke – Chair not voting (CNV).
6
24
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
6
Approve the 3rd publication public review of Addendum 62.1d (independent substantive
change to the 2nd public review) and the response to the commenter from the 2nd public
review.
MOTION 6 OPEN (12-0-18 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to Absent
Members)

Addendum 62.1g (2007) - See Attachments L and Z.
It was moved by John McFarland and seconded by Waller Clements:
7
Approve the 2nd publication public review of Addendum 62.1g.
DISCUSSION: Hoy Bohanon, a commenter on the previous public review, stated that
the addendum was much improved, although he hadn’t had time to thoroughly review it.
A suggested change to the language was suggested and accepted as a friendly
amendment.
MOTION 7 OPEN (12-0-19 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to Absent
Members)

Addendum DA-09 - See Attachments M and AB.
It was moved by John McFarland and seconded by Waller Clements:
8
Approve the 1st publication public review of draft Addendum DA-09 (Section 8 changes).
DISCUSSION: The Chair stated that he wasn’t sure the last sentence in Section 8.3
actually accomplished what it was intending. Larry Schoen suggested the last sentence of
Section 8.3 be changed to read “Systems shall be operated such that spaces are ventilated
when they are expected to be occupied.” This was accepted as a friendly amendment.
Roger Hedrick suggested striking Section 8.1.2 completely. This was also accepted as a
friendly amendment.
MOTION 8 OPEN (11-110-111 CNV, Pending a Continuation Letter Ballot to Absent
Members)
9
Approve the response to the request for an official interpretation of Standard 62.1-2004 from
Diogo Prado. See Attachment AD.
MOTION 9 PASSED 12-0-112, CNV

ATTACHMENT U – 4th Public Review Draft of 62.1c(2007)
Reason for abstention: Dennis Stanke – Chair not voting (CNV).
Reason for abstention: Dennis Stanke – Chair not voting (CNV).
10
Reason for negative vote: Richard Danks - No written reason provided.
11
Reason for abstention: Dennis Stanke – Chair not voting (CNV).
12
Reason for abstention: Dennis Stanke – Chair not voting (CNV).
8
9
25
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008









XX.
ATTACHMENT V - Motion 5 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT W - 3rd (ISC) public Review Draft of 62.1d(2007)
ATTACHMENT X - Response to Commenter on 2nd Public Review of
62.1d(2007)
ATTACHMENT Y – Motion 6 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT Z - 2nd Public Review Draft of 62.g(2007)
ATTACHMENT AA - Motion 7 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT AB - 1st Public Review Draft of DA-09
ATTACHMENT AC - Motion 8 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT AD - Response to the Request for Official Interpretation
from Diogo Prado
New Business
a. Next Meeting. The next SSPC 62.1 meeting will be held in conjunction with the
ASHRAE Winter Meeting in Chicago, IL, January 23-25, 2009.
Hoy Bohanon provided the committee with some feedback that he had received from the
course he taught on Saturday in Salt Lake City. The IAQ procedure needs beefing up; the
committee either needs to ignore it or state its limitations. There are mistakes in the
appendix for the IAQ procedure (Appendix D) that need fixing. The Education
Subcommittee will identify these and sent them to John McFarland. These will be on the
agenda for the ASHRAE winter meeting in Chicago in January 2009.
The Chair gave a special thanks to the committee members rolling off June 30th: Richard
Danks, John Girman, Roger Howard, Larry Schoen, and Chris Magee.
XXI. Adjournment
A motion to adjourn was moved by Joe Fisher and seconded by Larry Schoen. Motion
was unanimously approved by voice vote. The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
26
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
ATTACHMENTS
(Double-click icon to Open Document)
ATTACHMENT A
SSPC 62.1 Salt Lake Agenda
ATTACHMENT B
Request for Unofficial Interpretation from Mr. Luis Garcia.
ATTACHMENT C
Request for Unofficial Interpretation from Mr. Luis Garcia.
ATTACHMENT D
Request for Unofficial Interpretation from Mr. Brian Coldwell.
ATTACHMENT E
Request for Unofficial Interpretation from Mr. Jacob Blevins.
ATTACHMENT F
Draft Education Subcommittee Minutes for Friday, June 20,
2008
ATTACHMENT G
Chapter Presentation: ASHRAE 62.1 Update: Overview – Where
are we now?
ATTACHMENT H
Chapter Presentation: Ventilation Rate Procedure and IAQ
Procedure
ATTACHMENT I
PowerPoint Presentation – Standard 62.1 Future Addend Needs,
Where Should We Go?
ATTACHMENT J
Addendum 62.1c (2007)
ATTACHMENT K
Addendum 62.1d (2007)
ATTACHMENT L
Addendum 62.1g (2007)
AttachmentA-SSPC6
2.1SLCAgenda.doc
AttachmentB-Luis
Garcia(U).doc
AttachmentC-Luis
Garcia2(U).doc
AttachmentD-Questi
ons from Coldwell.doc
AttachmentE-JacobBl
evins(U).doc
AttachmentF-EducSu
bMinutes6-20-08.doc
AttachmentG-62Upd
ate.pdf
AttachmentH-62Upd
ateRates.pdf
AttachmentI-62.1Fut
ureAddendaNeeds.pdf
AttachmentJ-62.1c_
3rdPPRComment_Responses.doc
AttachmentK-62.1d_
2ndPPRComment_Responses.doc
AttachmentL-62.1g_
1stPPRComment_Responses.doc
27
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
ATTACHMENT M
Addendum DA-09
ATTACHMENT N
Addendum 62.1i (2007)
ATTACHMENT O
Request for Official Interpretation from Diogo Prado
ATTACHMENT P
Administration Subcommittee Minutes for Friday, June 20, 2008
ATTACHMENT Q
4th Public Review Draft of 62.1i(2007)
ATTACHMENT R
Motion 3 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT S
1st Public Review Draft of a New Addendum that Modifies
General Note 2 of Table 6-1 (Secretary’s Note: identified as DA18)
ATTACHMENT T
Motion 4 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT U
4th Public Review Draft of 62.1c(2007)
ATTACHMENT V
Motion 5 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT W
3rd (ISC) public Review Draft of 62.1d(2007)
ATTACHMENT X
Response to Commenter on 2nd Public Review of 62.1d(2007)
ATTACHMENT Y
Motion 6 Roll Call Vote Record
AttachmentM-DA-09
_1stPPR.doc
AttachmentN-62.1i_
4thPPRDevelopment.doc
28
AttachmentO-IC62.1
-2004-DiogoPrado.doc
AttachmentP-AdminS
ubMinutes6-20-08.doc
AttachmentQ-62_1i_
4thPPRDraft_2008-06-22.doc
AttachmentR-Motion
3 Vote Record(62.1i)6-22-08.doc
AttachmentS-DA-18
2008-06-22.doc
AttachmentT-Motion
4 Vote Record(NewAddendum)6-22-08.
AttachmentU-62_1c_
4thPPRDraft_2008-06-23.doc
AttachmentV-Motion
5 Vote Record(62.1c)6-22-08.doc
AttachmentW-62_1d
_-_3rd_PPR_Comment_Responses_-_20
AttachmentX-62_1d_
-_2ndPRDraft_Commenter_Response_2
AttachmentY-Motion
6 Vote Record(62.1d)6-22-08.doc
SSPC 62.1 Minutes June 21-22, 2008
ATTACHMENT Z
2nd Public Review Draft of 62.g(2007)
ATTACHMENT AA
Motion 7 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT AB
1st Public Review Draft of DA-09
ATTACHMENT AC
Motion 8 Roll Call Vote Record
ATTACHMENT AD
Response to the Request for Official Interpretation from Diogo
Prado
29
AttachmentZ-62_1g_
2ndPPRDraft_2008-06-22.doc
AttachmentAA-Motio
n 7 Vote Record(62.1g)6-22-08.doc
AttachmentAB-DA-0
9-2008-06-22.doc
AttachmentAC-Motio
n 8 Vote Record(DA-09)6-22-08.doc
IC_62_1-2004-Diogo
Prado-2008-06-22.doc