APPENDIX C
References
[† indicates publications resulting from project S-284 and its predecessor, S-251.]
Ahlborn-Breier, G., and W. D. Hohenboken. 1991. Additive and non-additive genetic effects on
milk production in dairy cattle: evidence for major individual heterosis. J. Dairy Sci. 74:592602.
Beam, S. W., and W. R. Butler. 1999. Energy balance effects on follicular development and first
ovulation in post-partum cows. J. Repro. and Fert. Suppl. 54, 411-424.
† Berger, P. J. 1994. Genetic Prediction for Calving Ease in the United States: Data, Models, and
Use by the Dairy Industry. J. Dairy Sci. 77:1146-1153.
† Boettcher, P.J. 2001. The future of dairy cattle breeding from an academic perspective. J. Dairy
Sci. 84(E. Suppl.):E62-E68.
† Boettcher, P.J., L.B. Hansen, P.M. VanRaden, and C.A. Ernst. 1992. Genetic evaluation of
Holstein bulls for somatic cells in milk of daughters. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1127.
Butler, W. R., and R. D. Smith. 1989. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum
reproductive function in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 72, 767-783.
† Cassell, B.G. 2001. Optimal genetic improvement for the high producing cow. J. Dairy Sci.
84(E. Suppl.):E144-E150.
† Clay, J. S., and B. T. McDaniel. 2001. Computing mating bull fertility from DHI non-return
data. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1238-1245.
† Dechow, C. D., G. W. Rogers, and J. S. Clay. 2001. Heritabilities and correlations among
body condition scores, production traits, and reproductive performance. J. Dairy Sci. 84:266-275.
† Dematawewa, C. M. B., and P. J. Berger. 1998. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305day yield, fertility and survival in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2700-2709.
Dransfield, M. B. G., R. L. Nebel, R. E. Pearson, and L. D. Warnick. 1998. Timing of
insemination for dairy cows identified in estrus by a radiotelemetric estrus detection system. J.
Dairy Sci. 81:1874-1882.
† Dunklee, J. S., A. E. Freeman, and D. H. Kelley. 1994. Comparison of Holsteins selected high
and average milk production. 2. Health and reproductive response to selection for milk. J. Dairy
Sci. 77, 3683-3690.
† Emanuelson, U., and P. A. Oltenacu. 1998. Incidences and effects of diseases on the
performance of Swedish dairy herds stratified by production. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2376-2382.
Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance
Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle
Page 2
Etherington W. G., M.L. Kinsel, and W.E. Marsh. 1995. Options in dairy data management. Can
Vet J. 36(1):28-33.
Foulley, J. L., and D. Gianola. 1996. Statistical analysis of ordered categorical data via a
structural heteroskedastic threshold model. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 28: 249-273.
Grohn, Y. T., V. Ducrocq, and J. A. Hertl. 1997. Modeling the effect of a disease on culling: An
illustration of the use of time-dependent covariates for survival analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 80:17551766.
Hansen, L. B. 2000. Consequences of selection for milk yield from a geneticist's viewpoint. J.
Dairy Sci. 83:1145-1150.
Harris, B. L. 1994. Animal model for New Zealand dairy cattle evaluation. Open Session
INTERBULL Annu. Mtg., Ottawa, Canada. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. No. 10. Dept. Anim.
Breed. Genet., Uppsala, Sweden
Harris, B. L., and E. S. Kolver. 2000. Review of Holsteinization on intensive pastoral dairy
farming in New Zealand. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E. Suppl.):E56-E61.
Harville, D. A. and R. W. Mee. 1984. A mixed-model procedure for analyzing ordered
categorical data. Biometrics 40:393-408.
Interbull. 1998. Proc. International Workshop on Genetic Improvement of Functional Traits in
Cattle: Fertility and Reproduction. Bulletin 18, International Bull Evaluation Service, Uppsala,
Sweden.
Kachman, S.D. 1999. Applications in Survival Analysis. J. Anim. Sci., Vol. 77:147-153.
Kadarmideen, H. N., and M. P. Coffey. 2001. Quality and validation of insemination data or
national genetic evaluations for dairy cow fertility in the United Kingdom. In Interbull Bulletin
No. 27, International Bull Evaluation Service, Uppsala, Sweden.
† Kearney, J.F., M.M. Schutz, P.J. Boettcher, and K.A. Weigel. 2002. Genotype by environment
interaction in grazing versus confinement dairy production. I. Milk production traits. J. Dairy
Sci. (submitted)
Lopez-Villalobos, N., D. J. Garrick, C. W. Holmes, H. T. Blair, and R. J. Spelman. 2000.
Profitabilities of some mating systems for dairy herds in New Zealand. J. Dairy Sci. 83:144-153.
Lindhe, B., and J. Philipsson. 1999. The Scandinavian experience of including reproductive traits
in breeding programs. In “Fertility in the high-producing dairy cow” (M. G. Diskin, ed.),
Occasional Pub. No. 26, pp. 251-261. British Soc. Anim. Sci., Galway, Ireland.
Lucy, M. C. 2001. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: Where will it end? J. Dairy
Sci. 84:1277-1293.
Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance
Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle
Page 3
† Luo, M.F., P. J. Boettcher, L. R. Schaeffer, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2000. Bayesian inference for
categorical traits with an application to variance component estimation. J. Dairy Sci. 84:694-704.
Mark, T., F. Fikse, G. Banos, U. Emanuelson, J. Philipsson. 2001. Summary of MACE pilot-runs
for somatic cell count and clinical mastitis. Interbull Bulletin 26, Uppsala, Sweden. http://wwwinterbull.slu.se/bulletins/bulletin26/Mark.pdf
McAllister, A. J. 2001. Is crossbreeding the answer to questions of dairy breed utilization? J.
Dairy Sci. 85(E. Suppl.): In press.
† McAllister, A. J., A. J. Lee, T. R. Batra, C. Y. Lin, G. L. Roy, J. A. Vesely, J. M. Wauthy, and
K. A. Winter. 1994. The influence of additive and non-additive gene action on lifetime yields
and profitability in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2400-2414.
McDowell, R. E. 1982. Crossbreeding as a system of mating for dairy production. Southern
Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 259. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge.
† Meyer, C. L., P. J. Berger, and K. J. Koehler. 2000. Interactions among factors affecting
stillbirths in Holstein cattle in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2657-2663.
† Meyer, C. L., P. J. Berger, K. J. Koehler, J. R. Thompson, and C. G. Sattler. 2001a. Phenotypic
trends in incidence of stillbirths for Holsteins in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 515-523.
† Meyer, C. L., P. J. Berger, J. R. Thompson, and C. G. Sattler. 2001b. Genetic evaluation of
Holstein sires and maternal grandsires in the United States for perinatal survival. J. Dairy Sci.
84,1246-1254.
NAAB. 1999. Proc. 53rd Annual Convention of the National Association of Animal Breeders.
NAAB, Columbia, MO.
Nebel , R. L., and M. L. McGilliard. 1993. Interaction of high milk yield and reproductive
performance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3257-3268.
Norman, H.D., R.L. Powell, J.R. Wright, and C.G. Sattler. 2001. Overview of progeny-test
programs of artificial-insemination organizations in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 84:18991912.
Royal, M. D., A. O. Darwash, A. P. F. Flint, R. Webb, J. A. Woolliams, and G. E. Lamming.
2000. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of
fertility. Animal Science 70:487-501.
Ravagnolo, O. and I. Misztal. 2000. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, parameter
estimation. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2126-2130.
† Rogers, G.W. 1993. Index selection using milk yield, somatic cell score, udder depth, teat
placement and foot angle. J. Dairy Sci. 76:664-670.
Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance
Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle
Page 4
† Schutz, M.M. 1994. Genetic evaluation of somatic cell scores for United States dairy cattle. J.
Dairy Sci. 77:2113.
† Shanks, R. D., R. G. Popp, G. C. McCoy, D. R. Nelson, and J. L. Robinson. 1992.
Identification of the homozygous recessive genotype for the deficiency of uridine
monophosphate synthesis in 35-day bovine embryos. J. Reprod. Fert. 94:5-10.
† Shook, G.E. and M.M. Schutz. 1994. Selection for somatic cell score to improve resistance to
mastitis in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 77:648.
Spalding, R. W., R. W. Everett, and R. H. Foote. 1975. Fertility in New York artificial
inseminated Holstein herds in dairy herd improvement. J. Dairy Sci. 58:718.
Swan, A. A., and B. P. Kinghorn. 1992. Evaluation and exploitation of crossbreeding in dairy
cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 75:624-639.
Thaller, G. 1998. Genetics and breeding for fertility, in Proc. International Workshop on Genetic
Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle: Fertility and Reproduction. Bulletin 18, International
Bull Evaluation Service, Uppsala, Sweden.
Touchberry, R. W. 1992. Crossbreeding effects in dairy cattle: the Illinois experiment, 1949 to
1969. J. Dairy Sci. 75:624-639.
† VanRaden, P.M., and G.R. Wiggans. 1995. Productive life evaluations: calculation, accuracy,
and economic value. J. Dairy Sci. 78:631.
† VanRaden, P.M. 2000. Net merit as a measure of lifetime profitability. AIPL Research Report
NM$1 http://aipl.arsusda.gov/docs/nm2000.html
† VanRaden, P. M., and A. H. Sanders. 2001. Economic merit of purebred and crossbred dairy
cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 85(E. Suppl.): In press.
Veerkamp, R. F., J. K. Oldenbroek, H. J. Van Der Gast, and J. H. J. Van Der Werf. 2000.
Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance, and
live weights. J. Dairy Sci. 83:577-583.
†Washburn, S. P., W.J. Silva, C.H. Brown, B.T. McDaniel, and A.J. McAllister. 2002. Trends
in reproductive performance in southeastern Holstein and Jersey DHI herds. J. Dairy Sci.
85:244-251.
† Weigel, D.J., B.G. Cassell, and R.E. Pearson. 1997. Prediction of transmitting abilities for
productive life and lifetime profitability from production, somatic cell count, and type traits in
milk markets for fluid milk and cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 78:639-647.
† Weigel, K. A. 2001. Possibilities for genetic improvement of fertility in US dairy Cattle. J.
Dairy Sci. [submitted].
Genetic Selection and Crossbreeding to Enhance
Reproduction and Survival of Dairy Cattle
Page 5
Weigel, K.A. and R. Rekaya. 2000. A multiple-trait herd cluster model for international dairy
sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 83:815-821.
Weller, J. I., I. Misztal, and D. Gianola. 1988. Genetic analysis of dystocia and calf mortality in
Israeli-Holsteins by threshold and linear model. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2491-2501.
Weller, J. I., and M. Ron. 1992. Genetic analysis of fertility traits in Israeli Holsteins by linear
and threshold models. J. Dairy Sci. 75:2541-2548.
† Wiggans, G.R. and G.E. Shook. 1987. A lactation measure of somatic cell count. J. Dairy Sci.
70:2666-2672.
Young, C. W. 1980. Systems of mating – problems and opportunities. Page 61-72 in Proc.
Natl. Inv. Workshop on Genet. Impr. Dairy Cattle, Milwaukee, WI. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
† Zhang, W., and G. E. Shook. 2000. Quality of reproductive event data for Dairy Herd
Improvement herds in Wisconsin. J. Dairy Sci. 83 (Suppl. 1):53 [Abstract].
† Zhang, W., and G. E. Shook. 2001. Influence of the quality of reproductive event data on
heritability of gestation length in DHI herds. J. Dairy Sci. 84 (Suppl. 1):410 [Abstract].