QEP Assessment Rubric - Internships

advertisement
Assessment for the Quality Enhancement Plan – Approved 2014
Faculty: At the end of the semester, please submit this form to Dawn Killenberg via e-mail at dkillenberg@agnesscott.edu for all internship courses & 450s.
Faculty Sponsor: ________________________ Student Name: ____________________________ Semester(s)/Year: _______ Program & Course #: ____________________________
Competent (3)
On balance the
strengths outweigh
the weaknesses
Developing (2)
Strengths and
need for
improvement are
about equal
Beginning (1)
Need for
Score
improvement
outweighs strengths
Accomplished (5)
Mostly strengths, no
weaknesses
Advanced (4)
Many strengths present, few
weaknesses
Intellectual
Connection
Has a deep and nuanced
understanding of the mission of the
organization, its history and future
plans; successfully applies
coursework for multiple disciplines
to solve an important problem or
further the mission of the
organization
Has a deep understanding of the
mission of the organization, its
history and future plans;
successfully applies coursework to
solve a problem or further the
mission of the organization
Understands mission of
the organization and
shows a curiosity about its
history and future plans;
appropriately applies
coursework in the context
of the needs of the
organization
Demonstrates
intellectual curiosity
about the
organization’s
mission; attempts to
apply coursework to
understand it
Little interest or ability to
state mission of
organization; no attempt
to apply coursework in
context of internship
Problem
Solving
Deeply understands the nature,
context and implications of the
problem; Develops multiple
strategies (from different
perspectives) for addressing the
problem; assesses potential
difficulties in implementation and
evaluates likely outcomes
Has a deep understanding of team
member roles and how those can
be replicated in other organizations;
Analyzes the effectiveness of the
team from multiple viewpoints;
Communicates the team’s value to
a range of stakeholders
Deeply understands the nature of
the problem and how the context
created the problem and affects
potential solutions; develops
multiple strategies (from different
perspectives) for addressing the
problem
Understands the nature of
the problem and how the
context generated the
problem; develops a single
strategy for addressing the
problem
Student states facts
of a problem and
attempts to develop a
strategy to address it
Little ability to explain
and analyze the nature
of a problem in the
context of their
internship
Fully understands roles of team
members; Has an ability to
evaluate team performance;
Demonstrates the team’s value to
her supervisor
Understands roles of most
teams members and can
explain their interaction;
Rudimentary ability to
analyze team performance
and communicate its value
to supervisor
Demonstrates little
understanding of how
teams work, their value
or members’ roles within
the team
Has awareness of personal
strengths, interests and fit with
professional goals. Knowledge of
opportunities within field.
Has awareness of
personal strengths,
interests and fit with
professional goals.
Knowledge of some
opportunities within field.
Understands her role
in the team and how
to work with
supervisor;
Communicates her
own role, but does not
evaluate team
performance
Is motivated to learn
more about field, but
has not yet made
connection with
professional goals.
Criterion
Teambuilding
Professional
Development
Has awareness of personal
strengths, interests and fit with
professional goals. Knowledge of
opportunities within field. Creating
network and building resume to
achieve goals.
Taking little initiative or
interest in developing a
professional plan from
internship experience.
Download