Clinical Haematological Malignancy Guidelines 2015 Peer review measures 13-2H-106-108,110 May 2015 1 CONTENTS Page No. Lymphoma 4 Myeloma 18 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 21 Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia 24 Acute Myeloid Leukaemia 25 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia 27 Myelodysplasia 28 Myeloproliferative Disorders 30 2 Clinical guidelines for the investigation and management of haematological malignancies 13-2H-106,107, 108 Where ever available national guidelines are used developed by British Society of Haematology. Currently guidelines exist for individual malignancies- see each chapter and the following: Obtaining consent 2012 Diagnosis and management of acute GvHD 2012 Diagnosis and management of chronic GvHD 2012 Management of organ specific chronic GvHD 2012 Facilities for the treatment of adult haematological malignancies – levels of care 2009 Haematological malignancies and ITU- in progress Insertion and management of central venous devices- in progress Management of CMV infection in haemopoietic stem cell transplantation 2013 Management of veno-occlusive disease 2013 Management of tumour lysis in adults and children with haematological malignancy -2015 These can be accessed at: http://www.bcshguidelines.com/ 3 LYMPHOMAS WHO CLASSIFICATION B-CELL NEOPLASMS T-CELL AND NK-CELL NEOPLASMS Pre-cursor B-cell neoplasm Precursor B lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukaemia Precursor T-cell neoplasms Precursor T lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma Blastic NK cell lymphoma Mature B-cell neoplasms Chronic Lymphocytic leukaemia/ Small Lymphocytic lymphoma B-cell prolymphocytic leukaemia Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma Splenic marginal zone lymphoma Hairy cell leukaemia Plasma cell myeloma Solitary plasmacytoma of bone Extraosseous plasmacytoma Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosaassociated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma Follicle centre cell lymphoma Mantle cell lymphoma Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma Primary effusion lymphoma Burkitt lymphoma/leukaemia Mature T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms T-cell prolymphocytic leukaemia T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia Aggressive NK cell leukaemia Adult T-cell lymphoma/leukaemia Extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type Enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma Mycosis fungoides Sezary syndrome Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified Angioimmunoblastic lymphoma Anaplastic large cell lymphoma T-cell proliferation of uncertain malignant potential Lymphoid papulosis B-cell proliferations of uncertain malignant potential Lymphoid granulomatosis Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, polymorphic HODGKIN’S LYMPHOMA Classical Hodgkin lymphoma Nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma Lymphocyte-rich classical Hodgkin lymphoma Mixed cellularity classical Hodgkin lymphoma Lymphocyte depleted classical Hodgkin lymphoma Nodular lymphocyte predominant lymphoma 4 WHO Performance score 0 1 2 3 4 No symptoms Symptoms but ambulatory Bedridden less than half the day Bedridden half the day or longer Chronically bedridden and requiring Assistance with activities of daily living Risk International Prognostic Index for DLBCL Risk Factor Age (years) Stage (Ann Arbour) Number of extranodal sites Performance Status (ECOG) Serum LDH Score 0 <60 I or II 0 or 1 0 or 1 Normal Hasenclever Score for CHL Score Age > 45yrs Male gender Albumin <40g/l Hb <105g/l Stage IV disease WCC > 15x 109/l WCC< 0.6x109/l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Score 1 >60 III or IV >1 >1 Elevated Low Intermediate/ low Intermediate/ high High Risk Low Intermediate High <3 3-4 >4 Early Stage- Favourable v.s. Unfavourable CHL (GHSG criteria) Favourable No bulk in mediastinum (<10cm) ESR<50 with no B Sx ESR <30 with B Sx No extranodal disease 1-2 lymph node groups Unfavourable (any 1 of below) Bulk in mediastinum ESR≥ 50 with no B Sx ESR ≥ 30 with B Sx Extranodal disease ≥3 lymph node groups FLIPI score for Follicle Centre Cell Lymphoma Score Age Stage Hb LDH No of nodal areas 0 1 <60 ≥60 <II ≥III <11.9 12.0 N >N <4 ≥5 Low Intermediate high MIPI for mantle cell lymphoma 0 1 2 3 Age <50 50-59 60-69 ≥70 PS 0-1 n/a 2-4 n/a LDH <319 320-479 480-715 >716 WCC <6.7 6.7-9.9 10-14.9 >15 5 0-1 2 3-5 0-1 2 3 4 Lymphoma Investigational and Clinical Management Guidelines 13 2H- 105 and 107 Investigations FBC, viscosity, DAT U+Es, LFTs, Ca2+, LDH, uric acid, 2microglobulin Igs and serum protein electrophoresis Hepatitis BsAg and cAb, hepatitis C and HIV Bone marrow aspirate and trephine Morphology-processed and reported locally Immunophenotyping- processed Plymouth, reported locally Molecular genetics- processed and reported Plymouth Lymph node biopsy Morphology-processed and reported locally, a proportion sent to Plymouth for dual reporting or second opinion Immunophenotyping- processed Plymouth, reported locally Molecular genetics- processed and reported Plymouth FISH- for double hit lymphomas – Guys and Thomas’ London IgH gene rearrangement – Exeter CT scan -Neck, Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis CT PET scan in selected patients- see indication below. Lumbar Puncture (only for clinical suspicion or where intrathecal therapy indicated) ECHO only if likely to receive anthracycline and previous cardiac history or other risk factors and/ or over 70) Pulmonary function tests if chest symptoms / disease and planned therapy with Bleomycin Semen cryopreservation where appropriate 6 Suggested Use of CT PET scanning in Lymphoma Outside a Clinical Trial All New Patients with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma CT PET at diagnosis Advanced stage disease IIB, III, IV Early stage limited disease (1A, IIA, non-bulky). Apply GHSG criteria ABVD X 2 Then repeat CT PET at week 3 of cycle 2 Early stage favourable ABVD x 2 plus involved site DXT (20 Gy) Early stage unfavourable ABVD x 4 plus involved site DXT (30 Gy) CT PET following DXT If DXT contraindicated Do CT PET following ABVD x 2. If PET neg 2 more A(B)VD and stop If PET negative continue to ABVD x6 IF PET positive switch to esc BEACOPP x 4 CT PET 3 at end of treatment. DXT to any single areas of PET positivity CT PET 3 at end of treatment. DXT to any single DLBC NHL Should consider CT PET upfront to stage Certainly all early stage patients by CT should have upfront CT PET No evidence for use of routine interval CT PET outside context of clinical trial. May be of value if considering stopping systemic chemotherapy early and considering other treatment options e.g. DXT CT PET should be performed in all patients at end of planned therapy to see that PET negative CR has been reached Radiotherapy should be tailored on basis of PET positivity rather than historical bulk criteria i.e. > 10 cm. FCC NHL Should consider CT PET up front to stage especially clinical stage 1A where considering involved site DXT Tailor DXT to sites of residual “disease” on basis of CT PET positivity Other Haematological Malignancies Where CT PET may be useful: 1. Some cases of peripheral T-cell NHL (NOS) 2. Occasional case of multiple extramedullary predominantly bony disease 3. Langerhans cell histiocytosis with bony disease plasmacytomas or myeloma with areas of PET positivity 7 Management of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma BCSH Guidelines: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, first line - 2014 Management of Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, relapsed and refractory - 2013 Management of nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma- in progress All patients need to have therapy discussed and documented at an appropriately convened MDT. All patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma should receive irradiated blood products to prevent transfusion-associated graft vs. host disease. Male patients should be offered semen cryopreservation where appropriate. Induction Treatment Options All patients should be offered an appropriate clinical study if available. See CT PET use guidance document Classical Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Early Stage as defined by GHSG criteria Favourable ABVD x 2 + 20 Gy IF radiotherapy Unfavourable ABVD x 4 + IF 30Gy Elderly consider ChLVPP +/- DXT or DXT alone Advanced Stage ABVD x 2 the interim CT PET. IF interim CT Pet +ve change chemotherapy to esc BEACOPP. Consider PET directed DXT to residual single PET positive areas at end of chemotherapy Elderly consider ChLVPP or Gemcitabine based regimens Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma Localised Local RT Advanced Stage R-CVP Relapsed/ refractory Disease Treatment Options Suitable for Intensive Treatment GDP x 2 and assess response to chemotherapy. If chemo sensitive disease or CT PET remission then mobilise PBSC and proceed to BEAM based PBSCT Late relapse, consider different chemotherapy regimen to original, radiotherapy if relapse in previously untreated field, especially if first remission was very long. Brentuximab - accessed via CDF. BV x 4 then assess response Treatment of relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma in patients who have failed at least two prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens and are not transplant candidates 8 As a bridge to allograft transplant for the treatment of Hodgkin’s lymphoma where no other salvage treatment is available Not suitable for intensive treatment options Localised disease - consider RT Advanced Stage - ChLVPP or Gemcitabine Long-term Follow-up of Patients with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Mammography Young patients are at a much-increased risk from breast cancer following mantle or other radiotherapy involving breast tissue. DxT should be avoided if at all possible in young women All women aged <30 who receive mediastinal radiotherapy should receive screening starting 10 years after irradiation. All those >35 years at time of DxT will be enrolled into national breast screening programme at 45 years of age Thyroid dysfunction Annual thyroid function testing is recommended in patients who have received radiotherapy to this area. Stop smoking Patients should be strongly discouraged from smoking following therapy as there is an Increased incidence of lung cancer if have Hodgkin’s lymphoma and smoke; this risk normalises if they are non-smokers. 9 Regimens for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma ABVD Cycle frequency every 28 days for 3-6 cycles Day 1 + 15 Day 1 + 15 Day 1 + 15 Day 1 + 15 Doxorubicin 25mg/m2 IV Bleomycin 10,000 units/m2 IV Vinblastine 6mg/m2 IV (max 10mg) Dacarbazine 375mg/m2 IV Pulmonary function tests may be performed pre-treatment and during treatment at set frequencies e.g. alternate cycles ChLVPP Cycle frequency every 28 days Day 1-14 Procarbazine 100mg/m2 PO Day 1-14 Chlorambucil 6mg/m2 (max. 10mg) PO Day 1-14 Prednisolone 40mg/m2 PO Day 1+8 Vinblastine 6mg/m2 (max. 10mg) Gemcitabine can be given every 14 days Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV Brentuximab Day1 1.8 mg/kg IVI over 30 minutes every 21 days Day 1 Day 1 Day 1-4 Day 8 Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV every 21 days Cisplatin 75mg/m2 IV Dexamethasone 40mg PO Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV GDP 10 Management of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma BCSH Guidelines: Investigation and management of mantle cell lymphoma 2012 Diagnosis and management of hairy cell leukaemia 2012 Investigation and management of follicular lymphoma 2011 Management of mature T cell and NK cell neoplasms 2013 Management of cutaneous T cell lymphomas- 2013 Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinaemia- 2014 CNS prophylaxis in NHL- 2013 Diffuse large B cell lymphoma- in progress Diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in solid organ transplant recipients – BCSH and BTS Guidelines 2012 Best Practice in Lymphoma Diagnosis and Reporting 2010 Best Practice in Lymphoma Diagnosis and Reporting Specific disease appendix 2010 Any patients receiving purine analogues (Fludarabine, Cladribine, and Deoxycorfomycin) required irradiated blood products for life. Aggressive lymphomas- common subtypes Diffuse Large cell B NHL First line Treatment Trial REMoDL B, INCA Stage I disease; R-CHOP x 3-4 + IFRT or R-CHOP x 6 depending on site of disease R-CHOP x 6 and consider IFRT to bulk disease (if no significant disease post chemotherapy – radiological CR – role of RT not clear cut- guided by CT PET) Unfit for anthracycline –RGCVP PMBL, high risk double hit Burkitts/ Burkitt like lymphoma DA EPOCH-R Central Nevous system chemo prophylaxis in Diffuse large B cell NHL Risk of CNS disease is generally considered to be dependent on site of primary disease. However the following sites are considered at particular risk and should receive intrathecal prophylaxis. Primary testicular DLBCL Primary breast DLBCL DLBCL involving epidural space In addition the risk of CNS disease is dependent on factors encompassed within the IPI score – particularly the number of extra nodal sites of disease (2 or more), and an elevated LDH. Therefore patients with: 2 or more sites of Extranodal disease and Elevated LDH are also considered at risk of CNS disease. 11 Patients should have: At least 3 intrathecal injections of methotrexate 12.5 mg (normally with cycles 2, 3 and 4 of systemic chemotherapy) Testicular DLBC should have at least 4 intrathecal injections If renal function and performance score allows, consideration should be given to high dose (3.5 g/m2) systemic methotrexate with folinic acid rescue in patients with testicular DLBC and consideration should also be given to primary DLBCL breast that appear to have a higher rate of parenchymal CNS disease. Current Torbay practice would be to give this at the end of first line chemotherapy – for 2 cycles at 15 day intervals. If DA EPOCHR is considered for high risk DLBCL (cmyc +ve, double hit etc) and high risk Burkitt’s lymphoma intrathecal methotrexate on days 1 and 5 of cycles 3-6 is suggested (Dunleavy ASH 2014) CNS directed therapy is not delivered to patients over the age of 80 years in some centres. Relapse Suitable for Intensive Treatment RGDP is more commonly used than RDHAP BEAM based PBSCT Not suitable for Intensive Treatment No standard treatment e.g. RGCVP Peripheral T cell lymphoma and anaplastic CD30+ T cell NHL CHOP x 6-8 Trial- chemo T Consider HD Rx for first CR in young/fit Brentuximab anaplastic lymphoma only via national CDF cohort application Primary Cerebral Lymphoma A regimen containing high dose methotrexate At least 3.5g/m2 MTX ideally given every 2 weeks for 4 cycles If radiological CR post chemotherapy no RT if residual disease or progression for RT Lymphoblastic lymphoma ALL-like protocol Nelarabine refractory T cell disease as bridge to BMT- at present via national CDf cohort application Burkitt’s and Burkitt’s-like Lymphoma First line Treatment options DA EPOCH-R, (R-CODOX-M IVAC) or CHOP-R like regimen 12 Follow-up Patients, when in remission, are followed up 3/12ly in year 1, 4/12ly in year 2, 6/12ly in year 3 and then annually. Patients with diffuse large B cell NHL who have remained in remission may be discharged at 5 years with the appropriate letter. Recent evidence has shown that elderly patients who enter and stay in a complete remission after first course of chemotherapy have the same OS as their peer group at 2 years post chemotherapy; this group of patients can be discharged at 3 years unless in a clinical trial. Patients are encouraged to telephone for an earlier appointment if they develop lymphadenopathy or other related symptoms. Indolent Lymphomas Early stage disease Patients with stage I and II diseases have high rates of long-term disease free survival when treated with radiotherapy alone. Advanced stage disease Many of these patients will not require immediate treatment, as early treatment has no effect on overall survival. Patients when in remission are followed up 3-12/12ly depending on duration from treatment. They are encouraged to telephone for an earlier appointment if they develop lymphadenopathy or other related symptoms. Treatment Options for common subtypes of indolent lymphoma Follicle centre cell lymphoma First line treatment Watch and Wait Stage IA/IIA – localised RT Appropriate regimens would include R –Bendamustine- via CDF R-CVP R-CHOP R-Chlorambucil – elderly/frail Followed by R maintenance 2 monthly for 2 years At relapse and subsequent relapses Re-biopsy to exclude transformation and re-stage Watch and wait Young and fit consider an autologous transplant procedure after salvage with RGDP In young patients with biologically aggressive disease and an available donor consider an allogeneic BMT. R-Bendamustine – at present via national cohort CDF application RCVP, FCR R-Chlorambucil R maintenance if not received as part of up front treatment Rituximab as a single agent when exhausted chemotherapy 13 Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma/ Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinaemia/SLVL First line Treatment options Watch and |Wait R2W trial R-bendamustine (CDF) R-CVP R-chlorambucil Relapsed/ refractory Disease Watch and wait RCVP R-chemo if not received R as part of first line regimen R-Bendamustine – at present via national cohort CDF application Hairy cell Leukaemia First line treatment Watch and wait Cladribine Relapsed / refractory disease Watch and wait R-Cladribine/ DCF Splenectomy Marginal zone lymphomas First line treatment options Watch and wait R chemo R maintenance in those who have responded to first line therapy R bendamustine RCVP R-chlorambucil Relapsed treatment options Watch and wait R chemo in those who have not previously received chemotherapy Bendamustine Of the stomach Watch and wait Eradication therapy and re-biopsy at 3 months R-Chlorambucil R- bendamustine R-CVP Repeat endoscopy/ endoscopic ultrasound monitoring 6 monthly for 2 years and then annually for 5 years. 14 For MALT lymphomas which have transformed to a more aggressive grade- as per DLBCL Mantle Cell Lymphoma First Line Treatment options Watch and wait particularly for patients presenting with a lymphocytosis and patients with low volume disease and asymptomatic irrespective of age. R bendamustine RCVP or FCR R-Chlorambucil for elderly patients In young patients (under 40yrs) strong consideration should be given to a low intensity allograft in first remission (PR or CR) For these patients a more intensive initial therapy would be indicated e.g. Nordic protocol R maintenance in those who have responded to first line therapy R Bendamustine- at present via national CDF cohort application Relapsed Disease Watch and wait (same criteria as for first line therapy) ibrutinib Intensive treatments as per DLCB NHL Other Rchemo e.g. FCR Thalidomide CHOP v CHOP + Velcade NCRN trial Bendamustine- at present via national CDF cohort application Phase II trials available in Plymouth for most relapsed patients. Currently open trials and inclusion/exclusion criteria available via research sisters. 15 Examples of Regimens for NHL R Chlorambucil Day 1-7 Day 1 Chlorambucil 10mg/m2 PO every 28 days Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV R bendamustine Day 1 Day 1 +2 every 28 days Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV Bendamustine 90mg/m2 IV RCVP Day1 Day1 Day1 Day 1-5 every 21 days Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 IV Vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (max 2mg) IV Prednisolone 100mg PO Day1 Day 1-3 Day 1-3 usually every 28 days Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV Fludarabine 40mg/m2 PO Cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2 PO RCHOP Day 1 Day 1 Day 1 Day 1-5 Day 1 usually every 21 days Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 IV Doxorubicin 50mg/m2 IV Vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (max 2mg) IV Prednisolone 100mg PO Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV FCR RGCVP every 21 days Day1 Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV Days 1,8 Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV Day1 Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 IV Day1 Vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (max 2mg) IV Day 1-5 Prednisolone 100mg PO GDP Day 1 Day 1 Day 1-4 Day 8 Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV every 21 days Cisplatin 75mg/m2 IV Dexamethasone 40mg PO Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV Cladribine usually once, but can be given subsequently if patient relapses Day 1-5 Cladribine 0.14mg/kg/d or can be given weekly Rituximab usually weekly x 4 Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV Brentuximab Day1 1.8 mg/kg Brentuximab IVI over 30 minutes every 21 days Ibrutinib 560mg od orally Nelarabine Days 1,3,5 nelarabine 1,500 mg/m2 IV every 21 days. 16 DA EPOCH-R every 21 days Day 1 Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV Day 1-4 Etoposide 50mg/m2/d Day 1-4 Vincristine 0.4mg/m2/d (no cap) all infused in 500ml Nsaline over 24hrs Day 1-4 Doxorubicin 10mg/m2/d Day 5 Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 over 2 hrs Day 6 Lenograstim 263mcg sc daily until count recovery Give on day 1 if N>1.0 and plts >75 for up to 6 cycles, patients are encouraged to administer their own GCSF and attend for FBC M,W F with a formal review on one day Dose escalations are required for each cycle and drugs individually see chemotherapy script RDHAP Day1 Day 1 Day 1-4 Day 2 Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV Cisplatin 100mg/m2 IV as 24 hr infusion Dexamethasone 40mg PO or IV Cytarabine 2g/m2 IV bd as a 3 hr infusion Patients require 0.5% Prednisolone eye drops If collecting peripheral blood stem cells start G-CSF from day 5 RIVE Day1 Day 1 Day 1-3 Day 1 Day 1-3 Day 1-3 Day 4 Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV Epirubicin 50mg/m2 IV Etoposide 200mg/m2 IV as 2 h infusion Mesna 1.8g/m2 IV bolus Ifosfamide 3g/m2 IV as 22 hr infusion Mesna 3g/m2 IV as 22 hr infusion Mesna 5.4g/m2 IV 12 hr infusion Patients require phenytoin 300mg nocte day-1 to day +5 to protect against the potential toxic effects of Ifosfamide. If collecting peripheral blood stem cells start G-CSF day 5 17 MULTIPLE MYELOMA Investigational and Clinical Management Guidelines 13 2H- 105 and 108 BCSH Guidelines Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2014 Al amyloidosis- 2014 UK Myeloma Forum (UKMF) and Nordic Myeloma Study Group(NMSG): guidelines for the investigation of newly detected M-proteins and the management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) 2012 Draft national chemotherapy algorithm –multiple myeloma 2015 Suggested Baseline Investigations FBC, viscosity U+Es, LFTs, Ca2+ Igs and serum protein electrophoresis, serum free light chains, 2microglobulin Urine Bence Jones protein. If positive 24 hr quantitation Skeletal survey/ MRI scan if suspect cord compression/ plasmacytoma Bone marrow aspirate and trephine Staging systems Criteria for Distinguishing MGUS from Myeloma Bone marrow (aspirate) plasma cell % Serum paraprotein BJP Immune paresis Lytic bone lesions Symptoms Anaemia Hypercalcaemia Abnormal renal function Myeloma MGUS >10% < 10% Variable concentration in serum; no specific diagnostic levels > 50% cases > 95% cases Often present Frequent Frequent May be present May be present IgG usually < 20 g/l IgA usually < 10 g/l Rare Rare Absent Absent or otherwise explained Absent or otherwise explained Absent or otherwise explained Absent or otherwise explained Factors at Diagnosis of MGUS, Predictive For Risk of Progression IgA Paraprotein IgG Paraprotein ESR BJP Serum Free Light Chains Normal globulins ISS score B2m <3.0mg/l and albumin >35g/l Neither B2m >5.5mg/l 1 2 3 18 > 10 g/l > 20 g/l > 40 Present Raised Two reduced Newly diagnosed and Suitable for Intensive Treatment Options CTD or similar followed by melphalan-based PBSCT Myeloma XI Bortezomibdue to presentation with a) advanced renal failure contraindicating standard therapy (dialysis either current or imminent) or b) multisystem amyloidosis (on amyloid centre review) Newly diagnosed and not suitable for intensive treatment Options Watch and wait Myeloma XI CTDa to plateau Bortezomib containing regimens- patients for who transplant is considered unsuitable Subsequent chemotherapy treatments Options Bortezomib sc with dexamethasone, bi-weekly or weekly +/- cyclophosphamide, for 2nd and subsequent relapse needs to be accessed via national cancer CDF cohort application at present Lenalidomide dexamethasone –third line; second line patients at present, require national CDF cohort application Bendamustine - at present via national CDF cohort application Re treat with induction chemotherapy if long duration of remission e.g. CTD Second autologous stem cell procedure Allograft Supportive care Consider PCP prophylaxis for patients treated with dexamethasone-based regimens Consider anti-thrombotic prophylaxis for patients treated with thalidomide or lenalidomide, Zoledronate monthly for 2 years Consider dental check prior to commencement and stop bisphosphonate (particularly zoledronate prior to dental work) to prevent osteonecrosis of jaw. Radiotherapy to painful lytic lesions- refer to appropriate oncologist Spinal cord compression refer to on call oncologist, consider discussing patient with spinal team at RDE/Plymouth 19 Myeloma Regimens (examples) CTD Cycle to be repeated every 3/52 for 4-6 cycles D1, 8, 15 D1-21 D1-4 and 12-15 Cyclophosphamide 500mg po daily Thalidomide 50mg Dexamethasone 40mg daily CTDa Repeated every 4/52 to max. response 6-9 cycles D1, 8, 15, 22 Cyclophosphamide 500mg/d D1-28 Thalidomide 50mg D1-4 & 15-18 Dexamethasone 20mg/d C Weekly Repeated every week until plateau Cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 po (reduce to 200mg/m2 if creatinine>300) Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 of Bortezomib sc Days 1, 4, 8, 11 given every 21 days or weekly on days 1, 8, 15 of 28 day cycle Dexamethasone day of and following bortezomib Bendamustine every 28 days Bendamustine 100-120mg/m2 IV days 1 and 2 Lenalidomide every 28 days on-going until disease progression or intolerance Lenalidomide 25mg D1-21 Dexamethasone D1-4,9-12,17-20 ( cycles 1-4 only) then for all subsequent cycles Dexamethasone D1-4 only 20 CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA- CLL Investigational and Clinical Management Guidelines 13 2H- 105 and 107 BCSH Guidelines Investigation and management of CLL 2012 Suggested Investigations FBC, Immunophenotyping- processed at Plymouth, reported locally : DAT U+Es, LFTs, Igs Hepatitis BsAg, cAb, hep C and HIV Bone marrow aspirate and trephine, if cytopenias/ commencing treatment Consider cytogenetics IgH gene rearrangements and 19p in selected patients, consider re- checking p53 status prior to treatment courses- Bristol Imaging –CT TAP Staging RAI Stage 0 1 2 3 4 Clinical features Lymphocytosis only Blood > 14.9 x 109/L, Marrow > 39% Lymphocytosis and lymphadenopathy Splenomegaly and/or Hepatomegaly Anaemia < 11g/100ml (not immune) Thrombocytopenia < 100 x 109/L (not immune) BINET Stage I II III Clinical features No anaemia, thrombocytopenia. < 3 involved lymph nodes No anaemia, thrombocytopenia. > 2 involved lymph nodes Anaemia < 10 g/100ml and/or thrombocytopenia < 100 x 109/L (not immune) 21 First Line Treatment Options Watch and Wait FCR Trial- RIALTO Bendamustine R Ofatumumab with chlorambucil for patients in patients who are unsuitable for fludarabine based therapy R-Chlorambucil to maximal response in those unable to tolerate FCR or R Bendamustine alemtuzumab- first line patients p53 deleted Subsequent Treatment Options Risk adjusted depending on age duration of remission etc Watch and Wait Trial- COSMIC R-Chlorambucil if patient achieved adequate response previously FCR R Bendamustine in whom Fludarabine is not an option- at present via national CDF cohort application Idelalisib or ibrutinib with rituximab(but not both) at relapse –via CDF Alemtuzumab- second line patients p53 deleted if not received previously Allogeneic transplant 22 CLL Treatment Regimens (examples) R Chlorambucil every 28/7 to maximum response Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV for first cycle escalating to 500mg/m2 for subsequent cycles Chlorambucil 10mg/m2 PO daily 7/7 FCR every 28/7 maximum 6 cycles Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV for first cycle escalating to 500mg/m2 for subsequent cycles Fludarabine 24mg/m2 PO daily 5/7 and Cyclophosphamide 150mg/m2 daily 5/7 Bendamustine every 28 days Bendamustine 100mg/m2 IV days 1 and 2 as single agent first line treatment R-Bendamustine 90mg/m2 IV days 1 and 2 (this is reduced to 70mg/m2 for relapsed disease) Alemtuzumab 1st week dose escalation 3mg, 10mg, 30 mg then 30mg three times a week for 12 weeks, given either IV or SC. This regimen require appropriate monitoring for atypical infections esp CMV Ofatumumab 300 mg Ofatumumab IV day1 and 2,000 mg ofatumumab for all subsequent infusions. The infusion schedule is 8 consecutive weekly infusions, followed 4-5 weeks later by 4 consecutive monthly (i.e. every 4 weeks) infusions. Idelalisib 150mg bd orally Ibrutinib 420mg od orally 23 CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA Investigational and Clinical Management Guidelines13 2H- 105 and 106 BCSH guidelines Guidelines for the measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukaemia 2011 Suggested Investigations FBC, U+Es, LFTs G+S HLA type patient and siblings if may be suitable for transplant options Bone marrow aspirate and trephine, Conventional cytogenetics and FISH for BCR-ABL- Bristol Molecular genetics quantitative PCR for BCR-ABL-Plymouth. ( mutation analysis – Kings, London) Treatment Options Trial – As national trial becomes available, SPIRIT 3 currently awaited. First line – Imatinib 400 mg / day OR Nilotinib 300mg bd Assess response according to ELN criteria Failure - Dasatinib 100mg / day or Nilotinib 400mg bd depending on initial treatment and mutation analysis. Sub-optimal response – treat as failure or opt to continue first line therapy for further period. Allogeneic bone marrow transplant may be an option for some treatment failures Bosutinib or Ponatinib may be needed in selected cases (eg Ponatinib in T315I mutated cases) Monitoring Bone marrow cytogenetics 6/12ly until achieved CCyR. Annual marrow considered standard although may be inappropriate for some patients with good response. BCR-ABL 3 monthly. If achieve MMR (<0.1) or CMR 6 monthly monitoring can be considered. ELN response criteria (abbreviated); Treatment failure: No HR at 3 months, no MCyR at 12 months, no CCyR at 18 months Suboptimal response: No CHR at 3 months, no CCyR at 12 months, no MMR at 18 months. Failure to achieve <10% MR at 3 months currently under evaluation. For failure, suboptimal response or loss of response, check mutation analysis to guide further therapy. 24 ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA- AML Investigational and Clinical Management Guidelines 13 2H- 105 and 106 WHO Classification AML Acute Myeloid Leukaemia with Recurrent Cytogenetic Abnormalities AML with t(8,21)(q22,q22) (AML1/ETO) AML with abnormal bone marrow eosinophils inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16,16)(p13,q22); (CBF/MYH11) Acute promyelocytic leukaemia- t(15,17)(q22,q12) (PML/RAR) and variants AML with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities Acute Myeloid Leukaemia with multilineage dysplasia Following a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MDS/myeloproliferative disorder Without antecedent MDS Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, therapy-related Alkylating agent-related Topoisomerase type II inhibitor-related (some may be lymphoid) Other types Acute Myeloid Leukaemia not otherwise categorised Acute Myeloid Leukaemia minimally differentiated Acute Myeloid Leukaemia without maturation Acute Myeloid Leukaemia with maturation Acute Myelomonocytic Leukaemia Acute Monocytic and Monoblastic leukaemia Acute Megaloblastic Leukaemia Acute Basophilic Leukaemia Acute panmyelosis with Myelofibrosis Myeloid sarcoma Suggested Investigations FBC, coagulation screen U+Es, LFTs G+S Bone marrow aspirate- reported locally Conventional cytogenetics/ FISH- Bristol Immunophenotyping- Plymouth Molecular genetics –Plymouth Remember to think about study enrolment before marrow if diagnosis certain, as extra samples are required. HLA typing if transplant procedure possible Semen cryopreservation- if appropriate 25 First Line Treatment- intensive options AML 18 or 19 (when open) DA3+10, DA3+8 followed by 2 cycles high dose Ara-C Gemtuzumab- CBF AML first line who are not in trial –at present via iCDF application First Line Treatment- non-intensive options low dose subcutaneous Ara-C Azacitidine Hydroxycarbamide Blood product supportive care Relapsed disease Re-induce with FLAG+/- Ida and search for sibling/ unrelated donor. Clofarabine as a bridge to transplant procedure- at present via national CDF cohort application Arsenic trioxide- relapsed refractory APL- Palliative options e.g. Hydroxycarbamide Supportive care 26 ACUTE LYMPHOID LEUKAEMIA- ALL Investigational and Clinical Management Guidelines 13 2H- 105 and 106 Suggested Investigations FBC, coagulation screen U+Es, LFTs G+S Bone marrow aspirate- reported locally Conventional cytogenetics/ FISH- Bristol Immunophenotyping- Plymouth Molecular genetics –Plymouth Remember to think about study enrolment before marrow if diagnosis certain, as extra samples are required. HLA typing if transplant procedure possible Semen cryopreservation- if appropriate First Line Treatment options <60 UKALL14 or similar with allograft if sibling donor TYA trial Brightlight >60 UKALL60+ Vincristine and prednisolone Relapsed Treatment Options If suitable for intensive treatment FLAG-Ida and consider transplant If not, consider palliative re-induction with Vincristine and Prednisolone and maintenance methotrexate/ mercaptopurine. Nelarabine- at present via national CDF cohort application for refractory T-ALL as a bridge to a transplant procedure Clofarabine- relapsed refractory disease as a brdge to transplant procedure- at present via national CDF cohort application Dasatinib- Ph+ ALL or lymphoid blast crisis of CML with resistance or intolerance to imatinib, at present via national CDF cohort application 27 MYELODYSPLASIA Investigational and Clinical Management Guidelines 13 2H- 105 and 106 BCSH Guidelines- diagnosis and management of adult myelodysplasia 2013 Disease RA RARS RCMD-RS RCMD* RAEB-1 RAEB-2 **MDS-U MDS with isolated 5q- Blood findings Marrow findings Anaemia No or rare blasts Erythroid dysplasia only, <5% blasts, <15% ringed sideroblasts Erythroid dysplasia only, < 5% Anaemia, no or rare blasts blasts, >15% ringed sideroblasts Dysplasia in 10% marrow cells in >1 cytopenia, no or rare blasts, no two or more myeloid lines, <5% Auer rods, <1x109 monocytes blasts, >15% ringed sideroblasts Dysplasia in 10% marrow cells in >1 cytopenia, no or rare blasts, no two or more myeloid lines, <5% Auer rods, <1x109 monocytes blasts, >15% ringed sideroblasts Cytopenias, < 5% blasts, no Auer Unilineage or multilineage dysplasia, rods, <1x109 monocytes 5-9% blasts, no Auer rods Cytopenias, 5-9% blasts, Auer rods Unilineage or multilineage dysplasia, or none, <1x109 monocytes 10-19% blasts, Auer rods or none Dysplasia in 10% marrow cells in Cytopenias, no or rare blasts, no one myeloid line, <5% blasts, no Auer rods Auer rods Anaemia, Usually normal or Normal to increased MGK with increased platelet count, < 5% hypolobate nuclei, <5% blasts, blasts, no Auer rods isolated 5q-, no Auer rods *Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, ** MDS-unclassifiable, Suggested Baseline Investigations FBC +film U+Es, LFTs Haematinics G+S Bone marrow aspirate- reported locally Conventional cytogenetics/ FISH- Bristol Immunophenotyping- Plymouth Erythropoietin level International Prognostic Scoring system BM blast percentage Karyotype Cytopenias 0 0.5 <5 5-10 Good 0/1 Intermediate 2/3 1 1.5 1120 Poor 28 2 2130 Treatment Options Transfusion support to maintain Hb below that causing symptoms Trial of erythropoietin if epo level <200U/l (RA/RAEB) <500U/l (RARS) Routine platelet transfusion not routinely recommended for thrombocytopenia patients- consider tranexamic acid Azacitidine-( NICE approved for IPSS int 2 or worse; CMML with 20-29% blasts, AML 20-30% with trilineage dysplasia) Consider transplant options for young/ fit patients CMML Cytoreduction with Hydroxycarbamide as required 5q- Syndrome Consider lenalidomide Management of infection Prophylactic Routinely no evidence for prophylaxis Consideration to use of prophylactic low dose GCSF in severely neutropenic patients to maintain N>1x109/l Therapeutic Neutropenic sepsis should be treated as per local policy with intravenous antibiotics 29 MYELOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS Investigational and Clinical Management Guidelines 13 2H- 105 and 107 BCSH Guidelines Diagnosis and management of myelofibrosis 2012 Amendment to diagnosis and management of polycythaemia 2007 (original guideline 2005) Molecular diagnosis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms: UK guidelines for the detection of JAK2 V617F and other relevant mutations 2012 Thrombocytosis and thrombocythaemia 2013 Investigations FBC, film erythropoietin Molecular – thrombocytosis- bcr-abl ,JAK2, CALR, exon 10- Plymouth - Raised haematocrit- JAK2- Plymouth, exon 12- Kings, London Bone marrow aspirate and trephine- reported locally Conventional cytogenetics/ FISH- Bristol Polycythaemia Vera Diagnostic Criteria JAK2 positive polycythaemia A1 High haematocrit (>0.52 in men and >0.48 in women) A2 Mutation in JAK2 Diagnosis requires both criteria to be present JAK2 negative polycythaemia A1 raised RCM (>25% above predicted) OR Haematocrit >0.60 in men and 0.56 in women A2 absence of mutation in JAK2 A3 no secondary cause A4 palpable splenomegaly A5 presence of an acquired genetic abnormality (excluding bcr-abl) B1 thrombocytosis (>450x 109/l) B2 neutrophilia (>10x109/l in non-smokers and >12.5x109/l in smokers) B3 radiological evidence of splenomegaly B4 endogenous erythroid colonies or low serum erythropoietin Diagnosis requires A1+A2+A3+ either another A or two B criteria 30 Management of PV Venesect to maintain Hct<0.45 Aspirin 75mg daily Cytoreduction should be considered if -Poor tolerance to venesection -Symptomatic/ progressive splenomegaly -Other evidence of disease progression e.g. weight loss/ night sweats Choice of cytoreductive agent < 40 years1st line- Interferon 2nd line- Hydroxycarbamide or anagrelide 40-75 years- 1st line- Hydroxycarbamide 2nd line- Interferon or anagrelide >75 years 1st line- Hydroxycarbamide 2nd line- 32P or intermittent busulphan Management of Apparent Erythrocytosis (2 measurements of Hct3/12 apart) Reduce/ eliminate risk factors- smoking/ alcohol/hypertension (avoid thiazide diuretics) Consider venesection in the following Recent history of thrombosis, or with additional risk factor for thrombosis Hct>0.54 (based on risk of thrombosis in idiopathic erythrocytosis) Untreated patients should be monitored to exclude further in Hct. There is no data on which to target Hct for those undergoing venesection – (suggests <0.45) Management of Idiopathic Erythrocytosis- (RCM but no primary or secondary cause found) Venesect to reduce Hct <0.45 if Hct is >0.54 Venesect to reduce Hct <0.45 if <0.54 and there is increased risk for thrombosis PMH thrombosis, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, hypertension Cytoreductive therapy is contra-indicated 31 ESSENTIAL THROMBOCYTHAEMIA WHO Classification Thrombocytosis 460 x 109/l Bone marrow biopsy showing proliferation mainly of megakaryocytic lineage with increased numbers of enlarged mature megakaryocytes + Criteria of exclusion No Polycythaemia Vera (Normal red cell mass or Hb < 18.5 men, 16.5 women) Stainable iron in marrow, normal Ferritin, normal MCV No CML (Philadelphia and BCR/Abl negative) No evidence of IMF No Collagen fibrosis, reticulin fibrosis minimal or absent No evidence of MDS Cytogenetics: no 5q-, t (3; 3) (q21; q26), inv (3) (q21; q26) No significant granulocyte dysplasia, few if any micromegakaryocytes No evidence that the thrombocytosis is reactive due to: No underlying inflammation, infection or neoplasm Prior splenectomy MANAGEMENT Risk assessment adapted from PT1 trial Low Risk ALL of the following features Intermediate Risk ALL of the following features Age <40 years Platelet count 600 but which has never been consistently > 1000 x 109/l Age 40-59 years Platelet count 600 but which has never been consistently > 1500 x 109/l No history of ischaemia, thrombosis or embolic features or erythromelalgia No history of ischaemia, thrombosis or embolic features or erythromelalgia Absence of haemorrhage considered to be related to PT Absence of haemorrhage considered to be related to PT Absence of hypertension needing Rx, non-smoker Absence of hypertension needing Rx, non smoker Absence of diabetes needing Rx Absence of diabetes needing Rx High Risk ANY of the following features Age 60 years Platelet count 1500 x 109/l (current or previous) History of ischaemia, thrombosis or embolic events (including erythromelalgia) Haemorrhage considered to be related to PT Presence of hypertension needing Rx or smoking Presence of diabetes needing Rx Low and Intermediate Risk MRC PT1 trial Note changes in risk group definition above (platelets > 1500 define high Aspirin 75 mg High Risk no trial available. Aspirin 75 mg for all patients once platelet count below 1000 x 109/l Hydroxycarbamide Alternatives for those who cannot receive Hydroxycarbamide 32 Interferon: “young” if able to tolerate. Pregnancy Interferon Busulfan 32 P Anagrelide IDIOPATHIC MYELOFIBROSIS FBC and film examination, U+E, LFT, Bone profile, Urate, CRP, Ferritin Bone marrow aspirate and trephine- reported locally Conventional cytogenetics/ FISH (if appropriate)- Bristol Molecular genetics bcr-abl –Plymouth Diagnostic criteria for primary myelofibrosis: diagnosis requires A1 + A2 and any two B criteria. A1 Bone marrow fibrosis _3 (on 0–4 scale). A2 Pathogenetic mutation (e.g. in JAK2 or MPL), or absence of both BCR-ABL1 and reactive causes of bone marrow fibrosis B1 Palpable splenomegaly B2 Unexplained anaemia B3 Leuco-erthroblastosis B4 Tear-drop red cells B5 Constitutional symptoms (Drenching night sweats, weight loss >10% over 6 months, unexplained fever (>37·5°C) or diffuse bone pains) B6 Histological evidence of Extramedullary haematopoiesis . Management Hydroxycarbamide Ruxolitinib- for first or 2nd line treatment of symptomatic splenomegaly –at present via national CDF cohort application Busulfan, Interferon or splenectomy (in carefully selected cases) as alternatives Allogeneic transplantation for young (discuss with transplant centre) Transfusional support or erythropoietin 33