11356_2012_1363_MOESM1_ESM

advertisement
1
Supporting Information
2
3
4
Uptake and translocation of organophosphates and other emerging contaminants in
crops used for forage and food.
Eggen, T*., Heimstad, E., Stuanes, A.O., Norli, H.R.
5
*Corresponding author, E-mail: Trine.Eggen@bioforsk.no
Page
Experimental Chemical analyses
2
Tables and figures
Table S1.Compound retention time, time segments, quantitation and qualification ions.
4
Table S2. Recoveries, relative standard deviation (RSD) and limit of quantification
(LOQ) for three different plant species, n=5 replicates
4
Figure S1 Distribution of neutral and charged species of NBBS and DEET with pH
5
6
1
7
Experimental
Chemical analysis
8
Chemicals: Acetonitrile, pestiscan, was purchased from Lab-Scan (Poch SA, Gliwice,
9
Poland). Sodium chloride (pa) and calcium chloride (pa) was purchased from Merck
10
(Darmstadt, Germany). Anhydrous magnesium sulfate was purchased from J.T. Baker
11
(Phillipsburg, NJ). Superclean PSA (primary-secondary amine), Superclean ENVI-Carb
12
(graphitizised carbon black), and DSC-18 Sorbents, as well as sodium sulfate p.a., were
13
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). Internal standard 2-brombiphenyl (purity
14
98.5) was purchased from (Dr. Ehrenstorfer, Augsburg, Germany).
15
Extraction of plant materials: The sample preparation followed the QuEChERS method [1,
16
2]. Subsamples of 1-5 g dried plant materials was added 10 mL bi-distilled water, 10 mL
17
acetonitrile and 1.0 µg of 2-brom-biphenyl as internal standard into 50 mL polypropylene
18
centrifuge tubes. The samples were homogenized on Polytron (Kinematica AG) for 1 min.)
19
Samples were added 4 g anhydrous MgSO4 and 1 g NaCl and the tubes were shaken 1 min
20
and centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm. After phase separation, all extracts were subjected to
21
dispersive extraction technique by use of 900 mg anhydrous MgSO4 and 150 mg PSA. For
22
clean up of seeds, 50 mg DSC-18 sorbent was added and for carrot, meadow and barley, 15
23
mg of Envi-Carb was added. For seeds an extra cleanup step to remove high molecular
24
compounds like fatty acids, their esters and to some extent plant sterols was performed by
25
freezing the samples at -20oC for 2 hours before carefully decantation of the none frozen
26
acetonitrile phase into a tube containing 1 g of CaCl2. The tubes were shaken 1 min and
27
centrifuged at 3000 rpm in 5 min.
28
Extraction of soil: 2.0-5.0 g subsample of dry soil and 1.0 g anhydrous MgSO4 was added
29
10.0 mL of acetonitile and 1 µg of internal standard into 50 mL poly-propylene tubes and
30
extracted in an “end over end “device for 30 min. The sample was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for
31
5 min and analyzed without any further clean up.
32
Instrumentation: The extracts were analyzed using an Agilent 6890 N gas chromatograph
33
connected to an Agilent 5973 mass spectrometer with an inert ion source operated in selected
2
34
ion monitoring mode. The GC was equipped with a Gerstel Programmable Temperature
35
Vaporising Injector (Mühlheim Ruhr, Germany) with a sintered liner, injection volume 5
36
µ
37
mL/min . At 1.89 min the split valve was closed and the injector temperature was raised by
38
270oC/min to 280 oC and held for 1.2 min. For information about retention time,
39
quantification ions and recovery, please see Table S1 and S2.
40
o
C in 1.8 min with a vent flow at 60.0
Separation was performed using a fused silica J&W Scientific HP-5MSI (0.25 mm i.d. x
41
30 m) with 0.25 µm film thickness. The column was connected to a 2.5 m methyl de activated
42
pre-column of same internal diameter as the analytical column (Varian inc. Lake Forest CA,
43
USA). The temperature program was 90oC, held for 1 min, 20oC/min to 160oC, held for 0
44
min, then 5oC/ min to 280oC, held for 5 min. A recovery test (with five replicates of barley
45
leaf, carrot root and fescue leaf spiked with 0.01 µg/g were performed and a recovery in the
46
ranged of 60-392 % was obtained. For DEET in fescue leaf and TBP in carrot- and fescue leaf
47
recoveries higher that 120 % were found. High recoveries are related to interferences from
48
matrix which co elute with the compounds and give an overestimation of the quantitative
49
result. However, in the real samples the concentrations was higher than 0.01 µg/g and
50
interferences therefore became insignificant. The calibration curves covered the range from
51
0.001 to 1.0 µg/ml with regression coefficients from 0.996 to 0.999. Reagent blanks and
52
positive control samples spiked at 0.2 µg/g of each test compound were included in each run.
53
The recoveries show acceptable results between 70-120 % [2]. Except for DEET in fescue
54
leaf and TBP in carrot- and fescue leaf, the limit of quantification could be set to 0.01µg/g
55
with a signal to noise higher than 10. In fescue leaf the LOQ had to be increased to 0.05 µg/g.
56
No LOQ for DEET in fescue leaf and TBP in carrot root was established due to interferences.
57
3
Tables and figures
58
59
60
Table S1. Summary of compounds retention time, time segments, quantitation and
qualification ions.
61
Compound
ion)b
Rt (min)
Window/start time (min)
Quantitation (qualifying
62
2-Brombiphenyl (IS)
10.9
I/10
232 (234)
63
DEET
10.8
I
162 (176)
64
TBP
11.7
I
211 (155,167,183)
65
TCEP
13.6
II/13.1
249 (251,223)
66
NBBS
13.9
II
213 (158,184)
67
TCPP
14.1a
II
277(279,291) ____
68
a
Retention time for the first eluting isomer
69
b
A compound is regarded as identified when the area of the qualifying ion is within ± 30 %
70
tolerance limit of the quantitation ion [2]
71
72
Table S2. Recoveries, relative standard deviataion (RSD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for three
different plant species, n=5 replicates.
Barley leaf
Recovery
(%)
DEET
118
73
74
a
b
Carrot root
RSD
(%)
4
LOQa
Fescue leaf
RSD
(%)
17
LOQa
0.01
Recovery
(%)
98
RSD
(%)
13
LOQb
0.01
Recovery
(%)
392
-
TBP
104
21
0.01
136
4
_
126
7.1
0.05
TCEP
96
6
0.01
96
12
0.01
60
11.8
0.05
NBBS
96
6
0.01
88
25
0.01
82
39
0.05
TCPP
115
5
0.01
113
6
0.01
110
20
0.05
S/N>10 estimated from the spiked samples at 0.01 µg/g
S/N>10 estimated from the real samples
75
76
4
77
78
Figure S1.
pH.
Distribution of neutral and charged species of DEET (A) and NBBS (B) with
A
79
B
80
5
81
Reference:
82
83
84
85
86
1.
Quechers http://www.quechers.com.
2.
Pihlström, T. Method Validation and Quality Control Procedures for Pesticide Residues
Analysis in Food and Feed; 2007.
6
Download